首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
目的探讨围术期实施加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)策略对腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术患者术后恢复的影响。方法选择2015年3月至2016年6月择期行腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术患者84例,男55例,女29例,年龄36~78岁,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,随机分为两组,每组42例。E组采用硬膜外阻滞联合全麻,加强术前宣教,术中保温,限制性补液,术中、术后完善镇痛等一系列ERAS策略进行围术期管理,C组采用常规围术期处理。记录补液量、术毕鼻咽温度、术后首次肠鸣音时间、首次排气时间、首次进流体食物时间、首次下床活动时间及导尿管拔出时间;记录术后PACU停留时间、总住院时间及总住院费用等。结果 E组补液量[(1 328±64)ml vs.(2 463±135)ml]明显少于C组(P0.05),术毕鼻咽温度[(36.2±0.2)℃vs.(35.1±0.5)℃]明显高于C组(P0.05),术后首次肠鸣音时间[(33.4±12.5)h vs.(42.8±14.3)h]、首次排气时间[(43.6±13.9)h vs.(60.7±15.4)h]、首次进流体食物时间[(26.8±4.1)h vs.(67.4±13.5)h]、首次下床活动时间[(7.4±1.6)h vs.(26.5±3.8)h]、导尿管拔出时间[(29.2±6.1)h vs.(51.8±7.6)h]、术后PACU停留时间[(26.4±8.5)min vs.(37.2±11.6)min]和总住院时间[(7.5±0.9)d vs.(9.7±1.2)d]明显短于C组(P0.05),总住院费用[(2.1±0.6)万元vs.(2.6±0.8)万元]明显少于C组(P0.05),术后恶心呕吐(2.4%vs.21.4%)、躁动(4.8%vs.26.2%)、皮肤瘙痒(7.1%vs.23.8%)及寒战(0%vs.19.0%)的发生率明显低于C组(P0.05)。结论加速康复外科策略应用于腹腔镜结直肠癌患者围术期管理,可减少术中舒芬太尼用量,防止术后低体温的发生,胃肠功能恢复更快,明显缩短住院时间和降低医疗费用。  相似文献   

2.
3.
目的探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)策略对肝切除术患者术后早期认知功能的影响。方法筛选96例原发性肝癌择期行肝部分切除术患者,随机分为两组,每组48例。C组实施常规围术期处理及麻醉方法,ERAS组实施ERAS策略对围术期处理及麻醉方法进行优化。于术前1d(T0)、术后1d(T4)、3d(T5)、7d(T6)应用简易智能量表(MMSE)评估两组患者认知功能,于T0、术后30min(T1)、6h(T2)、12h(T3)、T4取患者静脉血检测血清S100β蛋白、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)含量和IL-1β、IL-6及TNF-α表达量。结果与C组比较,T4、T5时ERAS组MMSE评分明显升高,T1、T2时S100β蛋白、IL-1β、IL-6明显降低,T2、T3时NSE明显降低,T1~T3时TNF-α明显降低(P0.05)。与T0时比较,T4、T5时C组患者MMSE评分明显降低,T4时ERAS组MMSE评分明显降低(P0.05)。两组T1~T3时S100β蛋白明显升高,T2~T4时NSE含量明显升高,T1~T4时IL-1β、IL-6、TNF-α表达量均明显升高(P0.05)。结论 ERAS策略应用于肝癌肝切除术患者可改善患者术后认知功能,其机制可能与降低患者术后血清中S100β蛋白、NSE、IL-1β、IL-6及TNF-α的含量有关。  相似文献   

4.
随着全球减重手术开展数量的增多,更安全有效地开展手术并促进病人的早期康复成为减重外科医师追求的重要目标。将加速康复外科(ERAS)理念应用于减重及代谢外科,通过对减重及代谢手术围手术期各项干预措施及临床路径的优化,可以有效地实现大幅度缩短病人住院时间,促进病人康复,进而提高病人满意度的目的。ERAS理念的实施深刻改变了现有减重及代谢外科的模式,合理、规范地开展ERAS对于减重及代谢外科的进一步发展具有重要意义。  相似文献   

5.
Objective To investigate the effects of fast-track surgery on postoperative rehabilitation of patients with liver cancer. Methods Forty-one patients with liver cancer who had been admitted to Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from 9 to 30 in July 2008 were randomly divided into fast-track surgery group (n =20) and routine treatment group (n =21) according to the random number table. Patients in fast-track surgery group were preoperatively educated in order to lessen their anxiety. Bowel preparation was not applied before operation, and they were orally administered with 1000 ml of enteral nutrition emulsion (1300 kcal), then they were fasted for 4 hours before operation. Urethral catheter and gastric tube were removed after operation. They were orally administered with 1000 ml of enteral nutrition emulsion on postoperative day 2, and were encouraged to partake in off-bed activity shortly after the operation. The off-bed time, anus exhaust time, postoperative complica-tions, hospitalization time, expense, nutritional and metabolic indexes on postoperative day 1, 3 and 5, hepatic and renal function, immune and stress indexes between the 2 groups were compared by t test and chi-square test. Results There were significant differences in off-bed time, anus exhaust time, patients' weight, expense, total bilirubin level on postoperative day 1, 3 and 5, and level of serum TNF-α on postoperative day 3 between the 2 groups (t =7.065, 5.483, 3.754, 2.291,2.289, 3.218, 3.192, 2.434, 2.089, P <0.05). Conclusions Fast-track surgery can accelerate the postoperative rehabilitation of patients with liver cancer.  相似文献   

6.
术后加速康复(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)是一系列重要的围手术期管理方法的优化整合,以达到减少手术应激反应和并发症的发生,缩短住院日,促进功能恢复。目前,已在胃肠外科、结直肠外科、胸外科、泌尿外科、骨科、妇科等成功应用。与其他外科相比,由于肝胆胰外科手术操作复杂、难度大、并发症发生率高等原因, ERAS尚未能在肝胆胰外科广泛应用。然而,由于肝胆胰外科手术时间长、创伤大,病人应激反应更强,很多临床实践经验表明,肝胆胰外科病人术后同样可以应用和实施ERAS理念和措施。  相似文献   

7.
研究背景:挥发性麻醉药在冠脉手术期间可以保护心肌。本研究旨在和全凭静脉麻醉相比较,说明挥发性麻醉药的应用与ICU住院天数和总住院天数(LOS)减少有关。  相似文献   

8.
目的 探讨减重手术的并发症及其处理方法。方法 回顾分析中国医科大学附属盛京医院2010年1月至2015年1月行减重手术治疗单纯肥胖或肥胖合并2型糖尿病病人228例临床资料,术式包括腹腔镜胃旁路术、袖状胃切除术、胃束带术,总结并分析其并发症情况。结果 腹腔镜胃旁路术143例,其中发生吻合口溃疡并出血2例,吻合口狭窄1例,营养不良2例,胸腔积液1 例,腹腔小肠扭转1例;腹腔镜袖状胃切除术77 例,术后发生持续反流呕吐2例,残留漏 1例;腹腔镜胃束带术8例,取出胃束带 1例。结论 减重手术术后并发症发生率相对较低,且经积极处理后预后均较好。  相似文献   

9.
目的探讨加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)策略中围术期使用帕瑞昔布钠对胃癌根治患者术后恢复的影响。方法选择2016年6月至2017年5月胃癌根治术患者60例,男40例,女20例,年龄18~65岁,BMI 18~30kg/m2,ASAⅠ—Ⅲ级。采用随机数字表法随机分为帕瑞昔布钠组(P组)和对照组(S组),每组30例。P组术前30min帕瑞昔布钠40mg+生理盐水稀释至5ml缓慢静推,术后每间隔12h静推帕瑞昔布钠40mg,连续使用3d;S组术前30min生理盐水5ml缓慢静推,术后每间隔12h静推生理盐水5ml,连续使用3d。两组围术期均采用ERAS策略,术后均给予舒芬太尼PCIA。记录两组患者术前(T0)、术后12h(T1)、24h(T2)和48h(T3)静息和咳嗽时VAS评分,术后24h内PCIA有效按压次数和舒芬太尼用量;检测术后2、5d炎性因子和癌胚抗原(CEA)浓度;记录术后排气时间、术后住院时间、术后切口感染、炎性肠梗阻和肺部感染等并发症的发生情况。结果 T1和T2时P组静息和咳嗽时VAS评分明显低于S组(P0.05);术后24h内P组PCIA有效按压次数和舒芬太尼用量明显少于S组(P0.05)。术后2dP组白介素-1β(IL-1β)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和C反应蛋白(CRP)浓度明显低于S组(P 0.05);术后5dP组IL-1β浓度、TNF-α浓度、中性粒细胞绝对数、前列腺素E2(PGE2)和CEA浓度明显低于S组(P0.05)。P组术后排气时间和术后住院时间明显短于S组(P0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义。结论 ERAS策略中使用帕瑞昔布钠能有效减轻胃癌根治术患者术后疼痛和炎症反应,促进术后恢复和缩短术后住院时间,且不增加术后并发症风险。  相似文献   

10.
11.
目的 探讨快通道麻醉(fast-track anesthesia,FTA)应用于结直肠肿瘤患者术后快速康复(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)中的可行性. 方法 将需手术治疗的104例择期结直肠肿瘤患者按随机数字表法分为传统对照组和快康观察组,每组52例.其中快康观察组按FTA方法进行麻醉,传统对照组按传统麻醉方法进行麻醉,观察并比较两组麻醉前(T0)、气管插管后5 min(T1)、切皮时(T2)、探查时(T3)、拔除气管导管后5 min(T4)的HR及MAP变化,观察患者全身麻醉药丙泊酚及肌松药维库溴铵的用量、术后苏醒时间、肛门排气时间、术后住院时间,统计术后并发症肺部感染和吻合口漏的发生率. 结果 快康观察组手术过程中HR、MAP波动较传统对照组较小(P>0.05).快康观察组术中麻醉药物的用量明显比传统对照组要少[丙泊酚(287±26) mg比(414±36) mg;维库溴铵(13.6±2.5) mg比(15.8±2.3) mg] (P<0.05),快康组患者术后苏醒时间[(14±4)min比(26±13) min]、肛门恢复排气时间[(26±13)h比(54±19)h]、术后住院时间[(5.6±1.3)d比(8.0±2.6)d]及肺部感染发生率(3.85%比9.62%)均小于传统对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组吻合口漏发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05). 结论 FTA贯穿整个围手术期,对促进患者ERAS起着重要作用.  相似文献   

12.

Background

Patients frequently remain in the hospital after bariatric surgery due to pain, nausea, and inability to tolerate oral intake. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concepts address these perioperative complications and therefore improve length of stay for bariatric surgery patients.

Objectives

To determine if ERAS concepts increase the proportion of patients discharged on postoperative day 1. Secondary objectives included mean length of stay, perioperative opioid use, emergency department visits, and readmissions.

Setting

A large metropolitan university tertiary hospital.

Methods

A quantitative before and after study was conducted for patients undergoing bariatric surgical patients. Data were collected surrounding length of stay, perioperative opioid consumption, antiemetic therapy requirements postoperatively, multimodal analgesia compliance, emergency department visits, and hospital readmission rates. Wilcoxon rank-sum and χ2 test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A secondary analysis was performed using Aligned Rank Transformation and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel χ2 tests to account for an increase in sleeve gastrectomies in the intervention group.

Results

The 2 groups had clinically similar baseline characteristics. Comparison group (N = 366) and ERAS group (N = 715) patients underwent a primary bariatric surgery procedure. There was an increase in the number of patients undergoing a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in the intervention group. After accounting for this increase, the percentage of patients discharged on postoperative day 1 was unchanged (79.8% non-ERAS versus 83.1% ERAS, P = .52). ERAS length of stay was statistically significantly lower for gastric bypass (P<.001) and robotic gastric bypass (P = .01). Perioperative opioid consumption was reduced (41.0 versus 16.2 morphine equivalents, P<0.001), and fewer ERAS patients required postoperative antiemetics (68.8% versus 46.2%, P<.001). Emergency department visits at 7 days were reduced (6.0% versus 3.2%, P = .04), but hospital readmission rates were unchanged.

Conclusions

Implementing ERAS did not reduce the percentage of patients discharged on postoperative day 1 in a bariatric surgery program with historically low length of stay, but it led to significant reductions in perioperative opioid use, decreases in postoperative nausea, and early emergency room visits.  相似文献   

13.
目的 探讨加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)技术在小儿咽部手术中的应用效果. 方法 择期接受咽部手术的6~12岁患儿60例,按随机数字表法分为ERAS组和传统方法(conservative treatment surgery,CTS)组(每组30例).其中ERAS组在术前宣教、麻醉处理、术后镇痛等方面给予具有循证医学证据支持的优化措施,CTS组采用常规围麻醉期处理.观察术后清醒时及术后2、8、24h时两组患儿血流动力学的变化、躁动评分、镇痛效果(VAS评分)、术后24 h内是否需要补救镇痛、术后24h内恶心呕吐并发症的发生率、住院天数. 结果 两组患儿各时点的生命体征、手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);ERAS组各时点的躁动评分[(2.41±0.50)、(2.48±0.67)、(2.39±0.81)、(2.33±0.51)分]、VAS评分[(3.3±0.5)、(3.2±0.5)、(3.0±0.6)、(2.6±0.9)分]、术后补救镇痛率(30%)和术后恶心呕吐发生率(33.3%)均低于CTS组的躁动评分[(3.54±1.01)、(3.63±0.92)、(3.42±0.32)、(3.38±0.20)分]、VAS评分[(5.3±0.4)、(4.9±0.3)、(4.8±0.4)、(3.9±0.5)分]、术后补救镇痛率(50%)和术后恶心呕吐发生率(66.7%)(P<0.05).ERAS组住院时间[(5.5±0.8)d]也明显短于CTS组[(7.1±0.5)d](P<0.05).结论 ERAS技术能减轻咽部手术患儿的术后躁动与疼痛,缩短住院时间,促进患儿康复.  相似文献   

14.

Background

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is considered new from the bariatric standpoint.

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness and safety of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol compared with the conventional approach in perioperative care of OAGB patients.

Setting

Turkey.

Methods

The prospectively collected data of 92 patients managed with standard care (group 1) were compared with 216 patients managed by the enhanced recovery after surgery pathway (group 2). All patients underwent OAGB by the same surgeon. The groups were compared in terms of mean postoperative length of stay; costs for surgery and recovery; and rates of complications, emergency room visits, and readmissions.

Results

Length of stay was always 5 days in group 1 and had a mean of 1.2 ± 1.3 days in group 2 (P < .001). The mean total cost for surgery and recovery was 858.6 ± 33.1 USD in group 1 and 625.2 ± 289.1 USD in group 2 (P < .001). Specific complications (Clavien-Dindo IIIa) occurred in 1 patient (1.1%) in group 1 and in 3 patients (1.4 %) in group 2 (P?=?1.000). Fifty-seven patients (61.9%) in group 1 and 45 (20.9%) in group 2 visited the emergency room within 1 month of being discharged (P < .001). Two patients (.9%) in group 2 needed hospital readmission; there was no need for rehospitalization in group 1 (P < .001).

Conclusion

The enhanced recovery after surgery pathway significantly reduces length of stay and cost after OAGB, with no significant difference in terms of surgical outcomes. It also reduces postdischarge resource utilization.  相似文献   

15.
目的 探讨早期功能锻炼路径在肝切除患者术后加速康复应用中的安全性和有效性.方法 选取安徽省立医院肝脏外科2014年12月-2015年8月原发性肝癌行肝切除治疗的患者共50例,根据数字表法随机分为2组,实验组(早期功能锻炼组)和对照组(传统早期活动组),每组均25例,比较两组患者术后住院时间、住院费用、并发症发病率、术后疼痛评分、术后下床活动时间和肠道通气时间.符合正态分析的计量资料以(x±s)表示,组间比较采用f检验,计数资料比较采用x2检验.结果 实验组术后住院时间(7.00±2.27)d,少于对照组(9.36±4.58) d(t =3.090,P=0.003);住院费用实验组(28 184.57±8 675.65)元,低于对照组(32 867.26±10 694.11)元(t=2.281,P=0.025);与对照组比较,实验组患者一般并发症发病率低和总体并发症发病率更低;肠道恢复时间实验组(36.56 h)早于对照组(45.24 h)(均P<0.05).结论 早期功能锻炼路径在肝切除患者术后加速康复锻炼应用中安全、有效,可以减少患者术后住院时间与住院费用,降低一般并发症发病率,加快肠道功能恢复.  相似文献   

16.
严柳  严缘园 《骨科》2020,11(5):446-449
目的 分析加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery, ERAS)理念对髋关节置换术(total hip arthroplasty, THA)病人术后并发症的预防效果。方法 回顾性分析我院2014年1月至2018年12月收治的200例行THA病人的临床资料,将术后采用常规护理的病人纳入对照组(100例),术后采用ERAS理念护理的病人纳入观察组(100例)。观察两组病人术后并发症发生情况、髋关节功能康复情况和功能独立性。结果 术后6个月,观察组并发症发生率为4.00%,明显低于对照组的14.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组Harris髋关节功能评分(Harris hip score, HHS)为(93.86±4.37)分,高于对照组的(77.64±8.74)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组功能独立性评定量表(functional independence measure, FIM)评分为(116.78±3.99)分,高于对照组的(94.09±6.82)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 ERAS理念可有效预防THA病人术后并发症,并且有助于提升病人髋关节功能康复效果及功能独立性。  相似文献   

17.
18.
目的探讨术后加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)、疼痛管理在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy,LSG)围手术期的临床应用效果。 方法回顾性分析2013年1月至2018年1月在首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院行LSG的300例患者资料,分别采用ERAS、疼痛管理,注重术前宣教和呼吸功能训练,术中行切割线浆肌层包埋,术中腹壁切口部位行局部浸润麻醉,术后不留置胃管、尿管及腹腔引流管,术后合理镇痛,早期进食和活动。统计患者在平均住院时间、术后疼痛(数字疼痛评分表,numerical rating scale,NRS)评分、术后进食时间及术后下床活动时间的差异,分析讨论目前实施ERAS的优点和存在问题。 结果ERAS组术后平均住院时间短[(1.5±0.8)d vs (2.7±0.8)d,P<0.05];无严重并发症发生;术后疼痛NRS评分低于传统组(P<0.05);术后下床活动时间早。 结论在减重与代谢手术的围手术期措施中,实施ERAS可显著缩短住院时间,患者术后疼痛明显减轻,患者恢复迅速,值得临床推广。  相似文献   

19.
目的比较加速康复外科(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)与传统围术期的麻醉管理对甲状腺手术围术期应激水平的影响。方法选择2016年5~8月择期行甲状腺手术的患者62例,男13例,女49例,年龄18~65岁,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,随机分为ERAS组(n=29)和对照组(C组,n=33)。ERAS组按照ERAS围术期流程操作,记录苏醒期和术后第1天VAS疼痛评分以及术后镇痛满意度评分,记录术前、术后当日和术后1d的C反应蛋白(CRP)、血皮质醇、IL-6、IL-8和TNF-α浓度。记录术后并发症的发生情况。结果苏醒期ERAS组VAS疼痛评分明显低于C组[(0.42±0.83)分vs(0.95±1.16)分,P0.05],术后1dERAS组VAS疼痛评分明显低于C组[(1.90±1.21)分vs(2.73±1.40)分,P0.05]。ERAS组术后第1天镇痛满意度评分明显高于C组(P0.05)。术后当日和术后1dERAS组CRP浓度明显低于C组;C组CRP浓度明显高于术前(P0.05)。两组术后咽痛、声嘶和饮水呛咳等并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义。结论 ERAS围术期操作系统在甲状腺手术中的应用安全、可靠,有效提高患者的满意度,提升舒适化围术期体验,同时减轻术后疼痛,促进患者快速康复。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号