Adverse Childhood Experiences and utilization of dental care: A cross sectional study of children in the United States

ObjectivesTo examine the relationship between Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and utilization and delay of dental care among children.MethodsUsing data from the 2018–2019 National Survey of Children's Health (n = 53,963) we examined the association between ACEs and 1) dental health; 2) use of dental care; 3) use of preventive dental care; 4) delaying needed dental care. Logistic regressions were used to calculate odds of each outcome, with nine ACEs and the cumulative number of ACEs as the independent variables each in separate models.ResultsAfter accounting for confounders, most ACEs were associated with higher odds of having poorer dental health. Similarly, most ACEs were associated with lower odds of using dental care and higher odds of delaying needed dental care.ConclusionsThis study expands the research showing a deleterious impact of ACEs on utilization of health care by showing that dental care is also adversely impacted. Efforts must be undertaken to improve access to dental care for children with a history of ACEs.     

Current Trends in Endodontic Treatment by General Dental Practitioners: Report of a United States National Survey

Introduction

In the United States almost 70% of root canal treatment (RCT) is performed by general dentists (GPs), yet little is known about their treatment protocols.

Methods

A paper survey was mailed to 2000 United States GPs with questions about the types of endodontic cases treated, routine treatment protocols, use of newer technologies, and endodontic continuing education (CE).

Results

Completed surveys were returned by 479 respondents (24%). GPs who perform RCT (84%) reported providing anterior (99%), bicuspid (95%), and molar (62%) RCT and retreatment (18%). Rubber dam was used always (60%), usually (16%), sometimes (13%), and never (11%). Newer technologies used by GPs included digital radiography (72%), magnification (80%), electronic apex locator (70%), and nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation (74%). Compared with GPs with >20 years of experience, those in practice for ≤10 years were more likely to use rubber dam (P < .05), nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation (P < .001), apex locators (P < .001), and magnification (P < .01); in contradistinction, GPs in practice >20 years were more likely to perform retreatments (P < .05). Women were less likely to perform retreatment or molar RCT (both P < .05). GPs with >5 hours of CE were more likely to use rotary instrumentation (P < .001), irrigant activation devices (P < .01), and apex locators (P < .001) and perform molar RCT (P < .001) and retreatment (P < .05), but no more likely to use rubber dam.

Conclusions

Recent GP graduates (≤10 years) were more likely to adopt new technologies and use rubber dam than those who practiced for >20 years. More experienced GPs were more likely to take on complicated cases than those with fewer years of practice. There was no association between hours of CE and compliance with rubber dam usage.     

Trends in the Prevalence of Dental Fluorosis in the United States: A Review

This paper assesses, by comparing recent published evidence with Dean's pioneering work, whether an increase in the milder forms of dental fluorosis may have occurred since Dean's time. To the extent that the crude comparisons of recent research with historic studies are valid, the data indicate a slight trend toward more fluorosis today than would be expected based upon findings in the late 1930s and early 1940s. This suggested increase in fluorosis is not as clear-cut nor as widely accepted as the recent decline in the prevalence of dental caries. Thus, further study of the prevalence of fluorosis and caries in relation to fluoride ingestion will be required to help validate the trend, and to allow dental researchers and decision makers to plan for the future.     

A View of the Future: Dentistry and Oral Health in America

BackgroundNew tools are enabling researchers to understand the mysteries of oral biology and disease and to change profoundly the treatment of oral, dental and craniofacial diseases and disorders. The authors explore advances in modern science and technology and how they will change oral health care in the future.ResultsEmerging technologies such as salivary diagnostics, high-resolution imaging and nanotechnologies, as well as other new tools will lead to efficient and highly effective personalized dental treatments. A new generation of cell-based therapies will be available for regenerating tissues, and anti-inflammatory drugs and pain medications will be tailored to maximize efficacy and safety. Large teams of clinicians and scientists will tackle increasingly complex problems, and advances in computational sciences will make it possible to create virtual teams across the world. Information technology systems will enable clinicians to examine and integrate information obtained from all databases in cyberspace.Clinical ImplicationsAs scientists discover newer and better methods to preempt and prevent disease, they must translate these methods into tools for people at greatest risk of developing disease. Conquering the array of complex diseases that affect the oral and craniofacial complex will require multifaceted strategies and multidisciplinary cooperation.     

Dental services use before and after inpatient admission among privately insured adults in the United States

BackgroundOral health has been connected to worse outcomes among hospitalized patients, but access to oral health care services in the hospital setting is limited. It is unknown how a hospital admission affects subsequent dental services use.MethodsThe authors conducted a retrospective analysis of insurance claims data from a national private insurer. Patients were included if they were admitted to the hospital and had visited a dentist at least once in the year before or after admission. Total number of dental visits, as well as Code on Dental Procedures and Nomenclature codes associated with these visits in the year before and after a hospital stay, patient demographic characteristics, hospital admission diagnosis, and length of stay were recorded. Differences in dental services use before and after the hospital stay were calculated.ResultsIn total, 107,116 patients met inclusion criteria. There were fewer dental visits after admission (mean [standard deviation {SD}] 1.6 [1.7] than before admission (mean [SD] 1.9 [1.8]; P < .0001). Fewer procedures were recorded in the year after discharge (mean [SD] 7.0 [11.4] total Code on Dental Procedures and Nomenclature codes versus 8.5 [12.5] in the year before admission; P < .0001). The number of diagnostic and restorative services delivered was higher after admission, and the number of periodontic, endodontic, oral surgery, and prosthodontic services decreased (overall Pearson χ², P < .0001).ConclusionsPatients are less likely to visit a dentist after a hospital stay, although impact on oral health is unknown.Practical ImplicationsHospitalization may contribute to already existing oral health disparities. Hospital teams and dentists should work together to enhance access to oral health care after hospital admission.     

Foreign-trained dentists licensed in the United States: exploring their origins

BACKGROUND: The authors explored the origins of foreign-trained dentists seeking licensure in the United States. METHODS: The authors analyzed data received from the American Dental Association Department of Testing Services for candidates who took the National Board Dental Examinations (NBDE) Part II from 2002 through 2005. They also established proxies for the information they sought in lieu of existing direct data. RESULTS: A total of 4,136 candidates took NBDE Part II from 2002 through 2005. The greatest number of foreign-trained dentists originated from India, the Philippines and Colombia. CONCLUSION: The greatest number of potential U.S. dental licensees are primarily from Asia, the Middle East and South America. However, precise studies need to be conducted to generate more exact data about foreign-trained dentists who practice in the United States. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The source of international dental graduates seeking licensure in the United States has implications for the licensure process and for the potential accreditation of foreign dental schools.     

Update on Prevalence of Periodontitis in Adults in the United States: NHANES 2009 to 2012

Background: This report describes prevalence, severity, and extent of periodontitis in the US adult population using combined data from the 2009 to 2010 and 2011 to 2012 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Methods: Estimates were derived for dentate adults, aged ≥30 years, from the US civilian non‐institutionalized population. Periodontitis was defined by combinations of clinical attachment loss (AL) and periodontal probing depth (PD) from six sites per tooth on all teeth, except third molars, using standard surveillance case definitions. For the first time in NHANES history, sufficient numbers of non‐Hispanic Asians were sampled in 2011 to 2012 to provide reliable estimates of their periodontitis prevalence. Results: In 2009 to 2012, 46% of US adults, representing 64.7 million people, had periodontitis, with 8.9% having severe periodontitis. Overall, 3.8% of all periodontal sites (10.6% of all teeth) had PD ≥4 mm, and 19.3% of sites (37.4% teeth) had AL ≥3 mm. Periodontitis prevalence was positively associated with increasing age and was higher among males. Periodontitis prevalence was highest in Hispanics (63.5%) and non‐Hispanic blacks (59.1%), followed by non‐Hispanic Asian Americans (50.0%), and lowest in non‐Hispanic whites (40.8%). Prevalence varied two‐fold between the lowest and highest levels of socioeconomic status, whether defined by poverty or education. Conclusions: This study confirms a high prevalence of periodontitis in US adults aged ≥30 years, with almost fifty‐percent affected. The prevalence was greater in non‐Hispanic Asians than non‐Hispanic whites, although lower than other minorities. The distribution provides valuable information for population‐based action to prevent or manage periodontitis in US adults.     

Assessing Patterns of Restorative and Preventive Care Among Children Enrolled in Medicaid,by Type of Dental Care Provider

BackgroundThe authors investigate the relationship of preventive dental treatment to subsequent receipt of comprehensive treatment among Medicaid-enrolled children.MethodsThe authors analyzed Medicaid dental claims data for 50,485 children residing in Wayne County, Mich. The study sample included children aged 5 through 12 years in 2002 who had been enrolled in Medicaid for at least one month and had had at least one dental visit each year from 2002 through 2005. The authors assessed dental care utilization and treatment patterns cross-sectionally for each year and longitudinally.ResultsAmong the Medicaid-enrolled children in 2002, 42 percent had had one or more dental visits during the year. At least 20 percent of the children with a dental visit in 2002 were treated by providers who billed Medicaid exclusively for diagnostic and preventive (DP) services. Children treated by DP care providers were less likely to receive restorative and/or surgical services than were children who were treated by dentists who provided a comprehensive mix of dental services. The logistic model showed that children who visited a DP-care provider were about 2.5 times less likely to receive restorative or surgical treatments than were children who visited comprehensive-care providers. Older children and African-American children were less likely to receive restorative and surgical treatments from both types of providers.ConclusionsThe study results show that the type of provider is a significant determinant of whether children received comprehensive restorative and surgical services. The results suggest that current policies that support preventive care–only programs may achieve increased access to preventive care for Medicaid-enrolled children in Wayne County, but they do not provide access to adequate comprehensive dental care.