The 24-Month Prognosis of Patients With Positive or Intermediate Results in the Intracoronary Ergonovine Provocation Test

ObjectivesThis study was an observational, multicenter registry to determine clinical characteristics and 24-month prognosis of patients who underwent intracoronary ergonovine provocation tests.BackgroundThe clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients who underwent the ergonovine provocation for vasospastic angina were not fully elucidated.MethodsA total of 2,129 patients in the VA-KOREA (Vasospastic Angina in Korea) registry were classified into positive (n = 454), intermediate (n = 982), and negative (n = 693) groups by intracoronary ergonovine provocation tests. The 24-month incidences of cardiac death, new-onset arrhythmia, and acute coronary syndrome were determined (mean 26.7 ± 8.8 months).ResultsThe number of smokers, frequency of angina before angiography, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and triglyceride were higher in the positive group than in other groups. The clinical characteristics of the intermediate and the negative groups were very similar. In the positive group, the incidences of diffuse, focal, and mixed spasm were 65.9%, 23.6%, and 10.6%. Coronary spasm was more frequently provoked on atherosclerotic segments. The 24-month incidences of cardiac death, arrhythmia, and acute coronary syndrome were low (0.9%, 1.6%, and 1.9%, respectively) in the positive group, and there was no cardiac death in the intermediate group (p = 0.02). In the positive group, frequent angina, current smoking, and multivessel spasm were independent predictors for adverse events.ConclusionsThe 24-month prognosis of the positive group in the intracoronary ergonovine provocation test was relatively worse than that of the intermediate group. More intensive clinical attention should be paid to vasospastic angina patients with high-risk factors including frequent angina before angiography, current smoking, and multivessel spasm.     

Randomized Comparisons Between Different Stenting Approaches for Bifurcation Coronary Lesions With or Without Side Branch Stenosis

ObjectivesThis study sought to evaluate the optimal percutaneous coronary intervention techniques using drug-eluting stents for bifurcation coronary lesions.BackgroundThe optimal bifurcation stenting technique needs to be evaluated.MethodsThe trial included 2 randomization studies separated by the presence of side branch (SB) stenosis for patients having non–left main bifurcation lesions. For 306 patients without SB stenosis, the routine final kissing balloon or leave-alone approaches were compared. Another randomization study compared the crush or single-stent approaches for 419 patients with SB stenosis.ResultsBetween the routine final kissing balloon and leave-alone groups for nondiseased SB lesions, angiographic restenosis occurred in 17.9% versus 9.3% (p = 0.064), comprising 15.1% versus 3.7% for the main branch (p = 0.004) and 2.8% versus 5.6% for the SB (p = 0.50) from 214 patients (69.9%) receiving 8-month angiographic follow-up. Incidence of major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization over 1 year was 14.0% versus 11.6% between the routine final kissing balloon and leave-alone groups (p = 0.57). In another randomization study for diseased SB lesions, 28.2% in the single-stent group received SB stents. From 300 patients (71.6%) receiving angiographic follow-up, between the crush and single-stent groups, angiographic restenosis rate was 8.4% versus 11.0% (p = 0.44), comprising 5.2% versus 4.8% for the main branch (p = 0.90) and 3.9% versus 8.3% for the SB (p = 0.12). One-year major adverse cardiac events rate between the crush and single-stent groups was 17.9% versus 18.5% (p = 0.84).ConclusionsAngiographic and clinical outcomes were excellent after percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stents with any stent technique for non–left main bifurcation lesions once the procedure was performed successfully.