Fulvestrant 500 mg Versus Exemestane in Postmenopausal Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer Resistant to Adjuvant Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BackgroundFulvestrant 500 mg and exemestane are widely used agents in first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ER⁺) postmenopausal MBC after failure of adjuvant nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) treatment. Although fulvestrant 250 mg had similar efficacy compared with exemestane (Evaluation of Faslodex versus Exemestane Clinical Trial study) and fulvestrant 500 mg was superior to fulvestrant 250 mg (Comparison of FASLODEX In Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer study), no direct comparison between fulvestrant 500 mg and exemestane has been conducted. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant 500 mg and exemestane in daily practice.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the medical records of all patients with ER⁺ HER2⁻ MBC who received fulvestrant 500 mg or exemestane 25 mg as first-line therapy for MBC from 2015 to 2017 in 4 institutions. A total of 120 patients were available for analysis. Both agents accounted for 50% (60) patients.ResultsThe median progression-free survival (PFS) of the fulvestrant group was significantly longer than that in the exemestane group (6.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.0-7.4] versus 4.8 months [95% CI, 3.0-6.7], P = .024). In subgroup analysis, for patients with visceral metastasis or primary endocrine resistance, no significant difference considering PFS was observed in the 2 groups (P = .563 and .769). No significant difference of Grade 3/4 adverse events was observed in the 2 groups (3 patients, 5% versus 2 patients, 3.3%; P = .648).ConclusionFulvestrant 500 mg showed better efficacy than exemestane in first-line therapy for MBC of ER⁺ postmenopausal women after failure of adjuvant NSAI treatment. For patients with visceral metastasis or primary endocrine resistance, both treatments showed poor outcomes, indicating a need for further alternatives (targeted therapy or chemotherapy). Both agents were well tolerated in terms of toxicities.     

Safety and efficacy study of oral metronomic vinorelbine combined with trastuzumab (mNH) in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial

Purpose

We conducted a single-arm prospective phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral metronomic vinorelbine combined with trastuzumab (mNH) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2-positive) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.

Methods

HER2-positive MBC patients received oral vinorelbine 40 mg thrice a week and trastuzumab (loading dose of 8 mg/kg, followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR?+?PR?+?SD for?≥?24 weeks). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), tolerability, and overall survival (OS).

Results

Twenty patients with HER2-positive MBC were enrolled, with a median of 1 prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC. Median age was 61.5 years (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 48.6–63.1). Visceral involvements presented in 14 patients (70.0%). ORR was 20.0%, and CBR was 75% with 4 PR (20.0%) and 11 SD (55.0%). The median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) were 7.4 months (95% CI 3.2–11.5) and 45.8 months (95%CI: not reached), respectively. The mPFS was 17.7 months (95%CI not reached) and 5.8 months (95%CI 5.6–5.9) in mNH as first-line and?≥?second-line therapy (log rank p?=?0.03), respectively. The most common grade 1 adverse events (AEs) included nausea (15%), leukopenia (15%), ALT/AST elevation (15%), diarrhea (10%), and peripheral neuropathy (10%). Grade 2 adverse events included leukopenia (5%) and neutropenia (10%). No grade 3/4 AEs were observed.

Conclusions

Oral metronomic vinorelbine combined with trastuzumab is a well-tolerated and effective anti-tumor regimen for HER2-positive MBC.

     

Metronomic chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab and erlotinib in patients with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer: clinical and biological activity

BackgroundThe object of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of metronomic chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab and erlotinib in patients with HER2-negative (HER2^?) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and poor hormone receptor expression.Patients and MethodsPatients with untreated MBC were candidates to receive metronomic oral capecitabine (500 mg thrice daily) and cyclophosphamide (50 mg daily) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) and erlotinib (100 mg daily).ResultsOf 24 patients assessable for response, we observed 1 complete response (CR, 4%), 14 partial responses (58%), 5 patients with stable disease greater than 9 weeks' duration (SD, 21%), and 1 patient (4%) with early progression of disease. The overall clinical benefit (CB) (CR + partial response + SD > 24 weeks) was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53%-90%). Median time to progression was 43 weeks (95% CI, 21-69). Patients with low levels of circulating endothelial progenitors (CEPs) at baseline had a significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS). Toxicity was generally mild. Grade 3 toxicity included diarrhea (n = 1), thrombosis (n = 1), and hypertension (n = 2). Grade 2 adverse events included diarrhea (n = 5), hand-foot syndrome (n = 13), and hypertension (n = 4).ConclusionTreatment with metronomic chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab and erlotinib was effective in HER2^?, estrogen receptor (ER)- and progesterone receptor (PR)-poor advanced breast cancer.     

Time to Resolution of Axitinib-Related Adverse Events After Treatment Interruption in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

IntroductionCombined axitinib and immuno-oncology (IO) therapy is approved for first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma. Overlapping toxicities represent a clinical challenge. Calculating the time to resolution (TTR) of common axitinib-related adverse events (AEs) after treatment interruption may help to identify AE etiology and determine appropriate management strategies.Materials and MethodsData from 5 randomized or single-arm axitinib monotherapy or combination studies were analyzed. Patients with histologically confirmed clear cell advanced renal cell carcinoma were pooled into 3 cohorts based on treatment received: axitinib monotherapy, axitinib + IO, and other tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Any grade and grade ≥3 treatment-emergent diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, nausea, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome were assessed. TTR was defined as the time from treatment interruption/discontinuation to resolution.ResultsThe axitinib monotherapy cohort comprised 532 patients, the axitinib + IO cohort 541 patients, and the other TKI cohort 882 patients. Median TTR for all AEs (any grade) in the axitinib monotherapy cohort ranged from 1 to 3 days, except for fatigue (8 days). For diarrhea, hypertension, nausea, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, median TTRs were longer in the axitinib + IO (4-11 days) and other TKI (7-8 days) cohorts versus the monotherapy cohort. Results were similar when only AEs of grade ≥3 were considered.ConclusionsThe TTR of monotherapeutic axitinib-related AEs is ≤3 days, except for fatigue, and generally shorter than for other single-agent TKIs and axitinib + IO. This has important implications for identifying AE etiology with combined axitinib-IO therapy and implementation of appropriate management strategies.ClinicalTrials.org identifiers: NCT00678392, NCT00920816, NCT02493751, NCT02684006, NCT02853331.     

A phase II,randomized, multicenter study evaluating the combination of lapatinib and vinorelbine in women with ErbB2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer

Lapatinib is approved in combination with capecitabine for treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who have progressed on prior trastuzumab in the metastatic setting. Vinorelbine is an important chemotherapy option for MBC. We evaluated efficacy and safety of lapatinib plus vinorelbine, compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine, in women with HER2-positive MBC. In this open-label, multicenter, phase II study, eligible patients (N = 112) were randomized 2:1 to lapatinib plus vinorelbine [(N = 75) 1,250 mg orally once daily (QD) continuously plus 20 mg/m²/day intravenously] or lapatinib plus capecitabine [(N = 37) 1,250 mg orally QD continuously plus 2,000 mg/m²/day orally, 2 doses]. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Other endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Patients progressing within the study were given the option of crossover to the other treatment arm; time to second progression was an exploratory endpoint. Patient demographics, stratification, and prognostic factors were well balanced between treatments. Median PFS in both arms was 6.2 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.2, 8.8 (lapatinib plus vinorelbine); 4.4, 8.3 (lapatinib plus capecitabine)]. Median OS on lapatinib plus vinorelbine was 24.3 months (95 % CI 16.4, NE) and 19.4 months (95 % CI 16.4, 27.2) on lapatinib plus capecitabine. In total, 42 patients opted to cross over; median PFS was 3.2 months (95 % CI 1.7, 5.1) on lapatinib plus vinorelbine and 4.0 months (95 % CI 2.1, 5.8) on lapatinib plus capecitabine. Lapatinib plus vinorelbine offers an effective treatment option for patients with HER2-overexpressing MBC, having displayed comparable efficacy and tolerability rates to lapatinib plus capecitabine.     

Role of Sorafenib in Overcoming Resistance of Chemotherapy-Failure Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

BackgroundSorafenib promotes apoptosis through downstream pathways that can be deregulated in CRPC. We hypothesized that sorafenib could overcome chemotherapy resistance in CRPC.Patients and MethodsEligible patients were those whose disease had progressed during chemotherapy (docetaxel or mitoxantrone) or within 12 weeks of stopping either. Patients then continued or resumed their last chemotherapy regimen with the addition of sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. Patients received a maximum of 6 cycles of chemotherapy/sorafenib followed by sorafenib alone until disease progression. The primary end point was combination safety. Secondary end points were overall response, percentage of SD, and time to progression (TTP).ResultsTwenty-two patients (21 evaluable) were enrolled (16 patients with Gleason score ≥ 7). Median age was 68 years (range, 59-83 years). Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 142 ng/dL (range, 13.6-9584). Visceral and bone disease were present combined in 9 patients (41%). Ten patients (47.6%) showed biochemical response (19% with > 50% PSA decline) and 16 patients (76%) achieved radiographic stability (according to Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors) after starting sorafenib for a median duration of 6 months (range, 4-12 months). Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were fatigue (n = 7, 32%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (n = 4, 18%). Dose reduction of sorafenib occurred at least once in 15 patients (68%) because of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (22%) and fatigue (22%). With a median follow-up of 19 months (range, 3-46 months), median overall survival was 8 months. TTP according to PSA level was 3 months and TTP according to imaging studies and/or clinically was 6 months. Median number of treatment cycles given was 6 (range, 1-10).ConclusionSorafenib can be combined safely with chemotherapy and in some patients overcomes chemotherapy resistance.     

Phase II randomised discontinuation trial of cabozantinib in patients with advanced solid tumours

BackgroundCabozantinib is an inhibitor of tyrosine kinases, including MET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, AXL and RET. This multi-cohort phase II randomised discontinuation trial explored anticancer activity of cabozantinib in nine tumour types.Patients and methodsCabozantinib was administered (100 mg, once daily) to patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic cancers. Those with stable disease at week 12 were randomised 1:1 to cabozantinib or placebo. Primary end-points were objective response rate (ORR) at week 12 and progression-free survival (PFS) in the randomised phase.ResultsA total of 526 patients were enrolled. The highest ORR was observed in ovarian cancer (OC) (21.7%); the largest PFS benefit was observed in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) (median 5.5 versus 1.4 months for placebo; hazard ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.04, 0.52). Disease control rates were >40% for CRPC, OC, melanoma, metastatic breast cancer (MBC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non–small cell lung cancer. Median duration of response ranged from 3.3 (MBC) to 11.2 months (OC). Encouraging efficacy results and symptomatic improvements prompted early suspension of the randomised stage and conversion to open-label non-randomised expansion cohorts. Dose reductions to manage adverse events (AEs) occurred in 48.7% of patients. The most frequent grade III–IV AEs were fatigue (12.4%), diarrhoea (10.5%), hypertension (10.5%) and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (8.7%).ConclusionsClinical antitumour activity of cabozantinib was observed in a subset of tumour types: CRPC and OC were evaluated further in expansion cohorts. Phase III programs were initiated in CRPC and HCC. Interpretation of efficacy outcomes was limited by early termination of the randomised portion of the trial.Trial registration numberNCT00940225.     

Maintenance of clinical efficacy after dose reduction of ixabepilone plus capecitabine in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of pooled data from 2 phase III randomized clinical trials

BackgroundThis retrospective analysis aimed to determine whether early dose reduction impacts the efficacy of ixabepilone plus capecitabine in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Patients and MethodsIn 2 phase III trials, patients (N = 1973) with anthracycline/taxane–pretreated MBC were randomized to receive ixabepilone 40 mg/m² on day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m² twice daily (BID) on days 1 to 14 or single-agent capecitabine 1250 mg/m² BID on days 1 to 14 of a 3-week course. Because of the similar design and populations, data from trials were pooled to evaluate efficacy of the combination regimen among women who did or did not undergo ixabepilone dose reduction during the first 4 courses. To adjust for bias resulting from selecting patients with inherently better outcome based on longer treatment durations, these analyses were restricted to patients who received ≥ 4 courses of ixabepilone.ResultsThe pooled cohort included 566 patients with measurable disease who were evaluable for efficacy. Patients who had early dose reduction showed similar objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) as did those with no/late dose reduction. ORRs were 62.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.8%-69.0%) and 55.3% (95% CI, 49.9%-60.6%), respectively; median PFS was 7.2 months (95% CI, 6.6-8.0) and 7.0 months (95% CI, 6.5-7.5), respectively (hazard ratio = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.83-1.17).ConclusionThese data suggest that early ixabepilone dose reduction did not affect the overall efficacy of ixabepilone plus capecitabine in patients with MBC who received ≥ 4 courses of treatment. By making appropriate dose reductions, ixabepilone-related toxicities can be minimized while maintaining clinical efficacy.     

Progression-free survival results in postmenopausal Asian women: subgroup analysis from a phase III randomized trial of fulvestrant 500 mg vs anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON)

Background

The international, phase III FALCON study (NCT01602380) in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (LA/MBC) who had not received prior endocrine therapy, demonstrated statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) for patients who received fulvestrant 500 mg vs anastrozole 1 mg. This subgroup analysis evaluated PFS in Asian (randomized in China, Japan, or Taiwan) and non-Asian patients from the FALCON study.

Methods

Eligible patients (estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive LA/MBC; World Health Organization performance status 0–2; ≥ 1 measurable/non-measurable lesion[s]) were randomized. PFS was assessed via Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1, surgery/radiotherapy for disease worsening, or death (any cause). Secondary endpoints included: objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, duration of response, and duration of clinical benefit. Consistency of effect across subgroups was assessed via hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a log-rank test. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated.

Results

Of the 462 randomized patients, the Asian and non-Asian subgroups comprised 67 and 395 patients, respectively. In the Asian subgroup, median PFS was 16.6 and 15.9 months with fulvestrant and anastrozole, respectively (hazard ratio 0.81; 95% CI 0.44–1.50). In the non-Asian subgroup, median PFS was 16.5 and 13.8 months, respectively (hazard ratio 0.79; 95% CI 0.62–1.01). Secondary outcomes were numerically improved with fulvestrant vs anastrozole in both subgroups. AE profiles were generally consistent between Asian and non-Asian subgroups.

Conclusions

Results of this subgroup analysis suggest that treatment effects in the Asian patient subgroup are broadly consistent with the non-Asian population.

     

Efficacy and safety of low-dose metronomic chemotherapy with capecitabine in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer

Aim

Registered dose capecitabine monotherapy is active against metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but retrospective analyses indicate that lower doses may be as effective and better tolerated. This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of metronomic capecitabine in heavily pretreated patients with MBC.

Patients and methods

In this phase II study 60 MBC patients received continuous metronomic capecitabine monotherapy (1500 mg once a day). Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate, secondary end points were clinical benefit rates (CBRs), tumour response rates (RRs), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), duration of response (DOR) and toxicity.

Results

Fifty eight assessable patients received two or more 28-day cycles of metronomic capecitabine. The CBR was 62%. Median DOR was 7 months. Median TTP and OS were 7 and 17 months, respectively. Two partial responses and 7 cases of stable disease were recorded in 13 patients who had previously received capecitabine intermittently (2000 mg/m²/day on days 1-14 every 21 days) as first- or subsequent-line treatment for MBC. Grade 3-4 adverse events were uncommon; haematologic toxicity was infrequent (5%) and consistently mild.

Conclusion

This regimen of metronomic capecitabine displayed good activity and excellent tolerability in MBC patients, including those who had previously received the drug at standard doses.     

A Dose-finding Study of Metronomic Oral Vinorelbine in Combination With Oral Cyclophosphamide and Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer

BackgroundMetronomic chemotherapy can induce disease control in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and has better safety profiles than conventional chemotherapy. Evidence suggests that cytotoxics can be anti-angiogenic in pre-clinical models and may have synergistic effects when combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies.Patients and MethodsPatients pretreated with ≥ 1 prior line of therapy for MBC received oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg daily in combination with oral vinorelbine at escalating doses of 20 mg (V20), 30 mg (V30), and 40 mg (V40) 3 times per week, and intravenous bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive disease were given the same regimen plus standard trastuzumab. Doses were escalated when 3 patients completed 3 treatment cycles of V20 and V30, without experiencing dose-limiting toxicities. The recommended dose was then tested in a further 6 patients. Circulating tumour cells and circulating endothelial cells (CEC) were measured in 30 mL of whole blood samples at baseline, after cycle 1, and at the disease progression.ResultsFifteen patients were recruited from June 2013 to October 2015. The median age was 61 years (range, 29-72 years); 80% had estrogen receptor-positive and 33% had human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive disease. At least 67% had visceral metastases, and 80% had received ≥ 2 lines of prior treatment. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at the 3 dose-levels, making V40 the recommended dose. Overall 8 (53%) patients developed grade 2 adverse events (arthralgia, n = 3 [20%]; asthenia, n = 2 [13%]; diarrhea, n = 2 [13%]; leukopenia, n = 2 [13%]). Bevacizumab was associated with grade 3 hypertension (n = 3 [20%]). Stable disease as best response was observed in 11 (73.3%) patients. The clinical benefit rate was 66.6% (10/15 patients). The median time to progression was 6.9 months. At baseline, CECs were more commonly detectable than circulating tumor cells; however, no statistical correlation was found between CEC kinetics and response.ConclusionA metronomic vinorelbine dose of 40 mg combined with cyclophosphamide and bevacizumab is a promising treatment regimen in pretreated patients with MBC.     

Randomized Phase 2 Studies of Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone or in Combination With Pegilodecakin in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC (CYPRESS 1 and CYPRESS 2)

IntroductionCheckpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have been approved to treat metastatic NSCLC. Pegilodecakin + CPI suggested promising efficacy in phase 1 IVY, providing rationale for randomized phase 2 trials CYPRESS 1 and CYPRESS 2.MethodsCYPRESS 1 (N = 101) and CYPRESS 2 (N = 52) included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 and first-line/second-line metastatic NSCLC, respectively, without known EGFR/ALK mutations. Patients were randomized 1:1; control arms received pembrolizumab (CYPRESS 1) or nivolumab (CYPRESS 2); experimental arms received pegilodecakin + CPI. Patients had programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score of greater than or equal to 50% (CYPRESS 1) or 0% to 49% (CYPRESS 2). Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per investigator. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory end points included immune activation biomarkers.ResultsMedian follow-up for CYPRESS 1 and CYPRESS 2 was 10.0 and 11.6 months, respectively. Results for pegilodecakin + pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab were as follows: ORR per investigator 47% versus 44% (OR = 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5–2.5); median PFS 6.3 versus 6.1 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.937, 95% CI: 0.54–1.625); and median OS 16.3 months versus not reached (HR = 1.507, 95% CI: 0.708–3.209). Results per blinded independent central review were consistent. Treatment discontinuation rate owing to adverse events (AEs) doubled in the experimental arm (32% versus 15%). AEs with grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related AEs (62% versus 19%) included anemia (20% versus 0%) and thrombocytopenia (12% versus 2%). Results for pegilodecakin + nivolumab versus nivolumab were as follows: ORR per investigator 15% versus 12% (OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 0.3–5.9); median PFS 1.9 versus 1.9 months (HR = 1.006, 95% CI: 0.519–1.951); and median OS 6.7 versus 10.7 months (HR = 1.871, 95% CI: 0.772–4.532). AEs with grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related AEs (70.4% versus 16.7%) included anemia (40.7% versus 0%), fatigue (18% versus 0%), and thrombocytopenia (14.8% versus 0%). Biomarker data suggested activation of immunostimulatory signals of interleukin-10R pathway in pegilodecakin-containing arms.ConclusionsDespite evidence of biological effect in peripheral blood, adding pegilodecakin to CPI did not improve ORR, PFS, or OS, in first-line/second-line NSCLC. Pegilodecakin + CPI has been found to have overall higher toxicity compared with CPI alone, leading to doubling of treatment discontinuation rate owing to AEs.     

Phase II,double-blind,randomized trial of capecitabine plus enzastaurin versus capecitabine plus placebo in patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer after prior anthracycline and taxane therapy

Capecitabine is frequently used in the treatment of recurrent/progressive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after prior anthracycline and taxane therapy. With the intention of improving the efficacy of single agent capecitabine, we initiated a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II study of the novel serine/threonine kinase inhibitor enzastaurin in combination with capecitabine in a heavily pretreated patient population. Patients received capecitabine 1,250 mg/m² twice daily plus enzastaurin 500 mg/day, or capecitabine plus placebo. The capecitabine was administered for the first 14 days of each 21 day cycle. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) using the log-rank test (1-sided significance level of 0.20). Of 109 patients assessed for eligibility, 85 were enrolled, randomized, and treated (42 and 43 patients in each respective treatment group). The study was terminated early following a preplanned futility analysis. Median PFS (95% CI) was 2.8 (2.1–4.6) months with capecitabine plus enzastaurin versus 4.3 (2.9–6.2) months with capecitabine plus placebo (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.728 [1.00–2.97]; P = 0.048). Median overall survival (95% CI) was lower with capecitabine plus enzastaurin than with capecitabine plus placebo (9.9 [7.0–16.6] months vs 14.9 [9.9–19.3] months, P = 0.181). Grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequent with capecitabine plus enzastaurin (42.9% vs 32.6%). Given the lack of PFS benefit, capecitabine plus enzastaurin is unsuitable as therapy for patients with recurrent/progressive MBC after prior anthracycline and taxane therapy. This trial is registered on (identifier: NCT00437294).     

Randomized Phase II Open-Label Study of mFOLFOX6 in Combination With Linifanib or Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BackgroundAlthough CRC is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States, second-line CRC treatment is limited. In this trial we examined the efficacy and safety of linifanib, an oral, potent, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor families, with mFOLFOX6, compared with bevacizumab and mFOLFOX6, in previously treated metastatic CRC.Patients and MethodsOne hundred forty-eight patients with advanced CRC previously treated with fluoropyrimidine or irinotecan received bevacizumab (10 mg/kg, intravenous), low-dose linifanib (7.5 mg), or high-dose linifanib (12.5 mg), with mFOLFOX6. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.ResultsNo statistically significant differences in PFS occurred between bevacizumab and linifanib doses (low, hazard ratio [HR], 1.453 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.830-2.539]; high, HR, 1.257 [95% CI, 0.672-2.351]). Median OS values were similar for bevacizumab and high-dose linifanib (bevacizumab, 16.5 months [95% CI, 13.0-not available]; high-dose linifanib, 16.4 months [95% CI, 11.9-21.7]; low-dose linifanib, 12.0 months [95% CI, 10.1-13.0]). ORRs were similar (bevacizumab, 34.7% [95% CI, 21.7-49.6]; low-dose linifanib, 24.0% [95% CI, 13.1-38.2]; high-dose linifanib, 22.4% [95% CI, 11.8-36.6]). Median cycles of 5-fluorouracil were reduced in the linifanib arms, versus the bevacizumab arm. Grade 3/4 adverse event occurrences were more frequent with linifanib. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, hypothyroidism, and thrombocytopenia were more common with high-dose linifanib than bevacizumab.ConclusionCombining linifanib with mFOLFOX6 as a second-line treatment for metastatic CRC did not improve PFS, radiographic findings, or duration of response versus bevacizumab and mFOLFOX6.     

Phase II interventional study (N0337) of capecitabine in combination with vinorelbine and trastuzumab for first- or second-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a north central cancer treatment group trial

BackgroundWe conducted a multiinstitutional phase II study of capecitabine in combination with vinorelbine and trastuzumab in patients eligible to receive first- or second-line treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive (HER2⁺) metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Patients and MethodsThe study was designed to test that the true confirmed response rate (CRR) was at most 45% vs. a true CRR of at least 65%. Between March 2005 and June 2008, eligible patients received capecitabine 825 mg/m² orally on days 1 to 14, vinorelbine 25 mg/m² intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, and trastuzumab 8 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 week 1 and 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The main outcome measure was CRR.ResultsOf 47 women accrued, 45 were evaluable. This design required at least 25 confirmed responses in the 45 evaluable patients for the treatment to be considered promising. Thirty women (67%) achieved a confirmed response; 25 women (56%) had a confirmed partial response (PR); 5 women (11%) had confirmed complete responses (CRs). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4-16.7 months). Median overall survival was 28.5 months (95% CI, 24.8-36.4 months).ConclusionsThis triplet combination demonstrated promising activity in patients with HER2⁺ MBC.     

Capecitabine/irinotecan or capecitabine/oxaliplatin in combination with bevacizumab is effective and safe as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II study of the AIO colorectal study group

BackgroundThis randomized phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx) plus bevacizumab and dose-modified capecitabine/irinotecan (mCapIri) plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).Patients and methodsPatients received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m²/day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m² bid/days 1–14 or with irinotecan 200 mg/m²/day 1 plus capecitabine 800 mg/m² bid/days 1–14 both every 21 days. The primary end point was 6 months progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsA total of 255 patients were enrolled. The intent-to-treat population comprised 247 patients (CapOx–bevacizumab: n = 127; mCapIri–bevacizumab: n = 120). The six-month PFS rates were 76% (95% CI, 69%–84%) and 84% (95% CI, 77%–90%). Median PFS and OS were 10.4 months (95% CI, 9.0–12.0) and 24.4 months (95% CI, 19.3–30.7) with CapOx–bevacizumab, and 12.1 months (95% CI, 10.8–13.2) and 25.5 months (95% CI, 21.0–31.0) with mCapIri–bevacizumab. Grade 3/4 diarrhea as predominant toxic effect occurred in 22% of patients with CapOx–bevacizumab and in 16% with mCapIri–bevacizumab.ConclusionsBoth, CapOx–bevacizumab and mCapIri–bevacizumab, show promising activity and an excellent toxic effect profile. Efficacy is in the range of other bevacizumab-containing combination regimen although lower doses of irinotecan and capecitabine were selected for mCapIri.     

Metronomic Capecitabine With Cyclophosphamide Regimen in Unresectable or Relapsed Pseudomyxoma Peritonei

BackgroundNo standard treatment for advanced unresectable pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) has been defined so far. PMP is traditionally considered chemoresistant but nonrandomized series showed promising results with regimens for gastrointestinal tumors.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a single-center prospective single-arm trial. Inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed PMP, unresectable or progressive to surgery/previous treatments. Patients received a continuous metronomic regimen with capecitabine (625 mg/m² twice per day) with cyclophosphamide (50 mg/d) until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points were disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory analyses were the variation of circulating tumor biomarkers and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR).ResultsTwenty-three consecutive patients were enrolled from April 2015 to October 2017. At a median follow up of 22.4 months, median PFS was 9.5 months and 1-year OS rate was 73.7%. Overall, DCR was 87% and 6 (27%) patients achieved disease control ≥12 months. The safety profile was manageable: 26% of patients reported Grade 3 drug-related adverse events and none Grade 4/5. NLR baseline < 3 versus ≥ 3 was associated with prolonged PFS (12.6 vs. 3.4 months; P = .0001).ConclusionMetronomic capecitabine with cyclophosphamide is a well tolerated regimen in unresectable/recurrent PMP, and its safety profile favorably compares with previously investigated regimens.     

Bevacizumab in Combination with Metronomic Chemotherapy in Patients with Anthracycline- and Taxane-Refractory Breast Cancer

Abstract

A vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor might enhance metronomic chemotherapy in previously treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Anthra-cycline and taxane refractory MBC patients were given cyclophosphamide 50 mg p.o. daily, methotrexate 1 mg/kg i.v. every 14 days, and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg i.v. every 14 days. Trastuzumab was added in HER2-overexpressing tumors. 24 patients were enrolled and 22 were evaluable. All tumors had histologic grade II-III and most patients had ≥2 metastatic sites. After a median follow-up of 7.7 months the response rates were: complete response (CR) 0%, partial response (PR) 31.8% (95% CI 13.9-54.9%), stable disease for ≥24 weeks (SD) 31.8% (95% CI 13.9-54.9%). Clinical benefit (CB= CR + PR + SD>24w) 63.6% (95% CI 40.7-82.8%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months; overall survival (OS) was 13.6 months. HER2-overex-pressing or high proliferative-index tumors had better 6-month PFS (75% vs. 34% in HER-negative tumors P= 0.043; 67% vs. 0% in Ki-67 ≥20% tumors, P = 0.015). Adverse effects were mild. The combination of bevacizumab and a metronomic-based chemotherapy was effective, well tolerated and provided clinical benefit in heavily-treated MBC patients.     

Quality of life with palbociclib plus fulvestrant in previously treated hormone receptor-positive,HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes from the PALOMA-3 trial

BackgroundIn the PALOMA-3 study, palbociclib plus fulvestrant demonstrated improved progression-free survival compared with fulvestrant plus placebo in hormone receptor-positive, HER2- endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This analysis compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between the two treatment groups.Patients and methodsPatients were randomized 2: 1 to receive palbociclib 125 mg/day orally for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off (n = 347) plus fulvestrant (500 mg i.m. per standard of care) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n = 174). PROs were assessed on day 1 of cycles 1–4 and of every other subsequent cycle starting with cycle 6 using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and its breast cancer module, QLQ-BR23. High scores (range 0–100) could indicate better functioning/quality of life (QoL) or worse symptom severity. Repeated-measures mixed-effect analyses were carried out to compare on-treatment overall scores and changes from baseline between treatment groups while controlling for baseline. Between-group comparisons of time to deterioration in global QoL and pain were made using an unstratified log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsQuestionnaire completion rates were high at baseline and during treatment (from baseline to cycle 14, ≥95.8% in each group completed ≥1 question on the EORTC QLQ-C30). On treatment, estimated overall global QoL scores significantly favored the palbociclib plus fulvestrant group [66.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 64.5–67.7 versus 63.0, 95% CI 60.6–65.3; P = 0.0313]. Significantly greater improvement from baseline in pain was also observed in this group (-3.3, 95% CI -5.1 to -1.5 versus 2.0, 95% CI -0.6 to 4.6; P = 0.0011). No significant differences were observed for other QLQ-BR23 functioning domains, breast or arm symptoms. Treatment with palbociclib plus fulvestrant significantly delayed deterioration in global QoL (P < 0.025) and pain (P < 0.001) compared with fulvestrant alone.ConclusionPalbociclib plus fulvestrant allowed patients to maintain good QoL in the endocrine resistance setting while experiencing substantially delayed disease progression.Clinical Trial RegistrationNCT01942135.     

Capecitabine-Based Chemoendocrine Combination as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Hormone-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Phase 2 Study

BackgroundPreclinical studies have suggested a synergistic effect of tamoxifen and capecitabine in estrogen receptor–positive cell lines. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of first-line chemoendocrine treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Biochemical assessment was performed of serum levels of thymidine phosphorylase enzyme (TP), serum tamoxifen, hydroxytamoxifen, and 5-fluorouracil in relationship to efficacy.Patients and MethodsThis prospective phase 2 interventional study studied patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2⁻ metastatic breast cancer who received either tamoxifen/capecitabine or letrozole/capecitabine as first-line treatment. The dose of capecitabine provided at 2000 mg per day continuously as a fixed dose.ResultsForty women with a median age of 49.3 years were enrolled. For the whole study group, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10 months and median overall survival (OS) was 23.3 months. The overall response rate was 60% and the clinical benefit rate 82.5%. Progesterone receptor positivity was associated with significantly longer PFS (12 vs. 7 months, P = .021). The most frequent adverse events were palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia (62.5%), fatigue (62.5%), diarrhea (30%), abdominal pain (12.5%), and constipation (10%). Changes in serum level of TP were not correlated to response to treatment, PFS, or OS. Higher serum levels of tamoxifen and hydroxytamoxifen were correlated with higher response rates and longer PFS but not OS.ConclusionChemoendocrine treatment is well tolerated, with no evidence of contradictory effects between the combination components. However, the efficacy data need more validation.