Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) are intended to support clinical activity, improve efficiency, and reduce error. Reluctance to use EMRs may exist among clinicians. The purpose of this study was to assess physician and nurse satisfaction with an Emergency Department (ED) EMR. We surveyed Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians and nurses at a large urban teaching hospital after implementation of an Emergency Department EMR. The questionnaire assessed: 1) computer background and experience; 2) perceptions regarding EMR use; and 3) concerns about impact upon quality of patient care. The clinicians find the EMR easy to use and are generally satisfied with the impact on their work. However, they report that the EMR has no positive impact on patient care. They report confusion in following the sequence of screens, and are concerned with the amount of time it takes to use the EMR and the confidentiality of patient information. Similar results were found between physicians and nurses. Nurses, but not physicians, report that they are able to finish work much faster than before implementation (p < 0.05). We were unable to correlate computer background and experience with satisfaction with an EMR. This survey suggests that EM physicians and nurses favor the use of an EMR and suggests opportunities for EMR enhancement.     

Interdisciplinary collaboration and the electronic medical record

PURPOSE: To examine interdisciplinary collaboration via electronic medical records (EMRs) with a focus on physicians' perception of nursing documentation. DESIGN: Quality improvement project using a survey instrument. LOCATION: Tertiary care pediatric hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven physicians. OUTCOME MEASURE: Physicians perceptions of nursing documentation after EMR implementation KEY FINDINGS: Physicians desire nursing documentation with greater clarity and additional information. Physicians indicate checklists alone for patient assessment and intervention data are insufficient for effective nurse/physician collaboration. Narrative nursing summaries are invaluable references that guide medical treatment decisions. Physicians see detailed assessments and well-described interventions of nurses' as critical to their ability to effectively practice medicine. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Health care technology is called to develop EMRs that enable nurses to document detailed patient data in a swift and straightforward manner. Joint collaboration between nurses, physicians, and technology specialists is recommended to develop effective EMR systems.     

Finnish nurses' perceptions of care of older patients

The aim of the study was to explore how far the perceptions of care of nurses in Finland take into account the preferences of the older patient and the patient's family members and to evaluate related background factors. The data were collected by questionnaire with nurses (n = 167) working in a geriatric hospital. The questionnaire contained items about shared decision‐making, attitudes to nursing patients, assessment of patients' functional ability and need for care, goal‐setting, evaluation of outcomes and discharge planning. This study showed that taking into account the preferences of the patient and the patient's family members regarding the patient's care was challenging for the nurses in practice. About one‐third of the nurses reported making the decisions on a patient's care themselves and not respecting patient autonomy in situations where patients are not able to assess their own situation. In addition, the nurses reported asking for the views of patients less frequently than those of family members when assessing and setting patient care goals. In practice, nurses need to be aware of this, during the transition from routine‐centred care to patient‐centred care.     

Nurses' Experience of Caring for Patients in the Community After Discharge With an Interventional Radiology Drain in Ireland: A Qualitative Study

Interventional radiology (IR) is a rapidly expanding specialty within medicine. As a result, a new population of patients has emerged in Ireland; those discharged home with an IR drain for curative or preventative purposes requiring the care of nurses working in the community setting. The purpose of this study is to describe the experiences of nurses in the community caring for patients with an IR drain, with the objective of assisting in developing a new body of knowledge to enhance a patient's journey as they transition from an IR department to the community. The study is based on individual interviews analyzed using Colaizzi seven-step framework. Three themes emerged from the data findings: knowledge gap, information gap, and educational gap, whereby license professionals require additional education and training to care for this patient population. The study findings concluded that nurses in the community are unprepared to care for this patient cohort because of a knowledge deficit, inaccurate and poorly written discharge summaries, and a lack of education and training among nurses and patients regarding the intervention performed.     

Electronic Medical Records and Electronic Health Records: Overview for Nurse Practitioners

Electronic medical records (EMRs) and electronic health records (EHRs) have become essential systems by which nurse practitioners (NPs) communicate vital patient information to other members of the health care team as well as to patients. In this article we examine the important distinctions between EMRs and EHRs; review the genesis of these types of records; summarize applicable provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act from a recent legal case centered around NP utilization of EMRs and EHRs; address open patient access to medical information; and examine threats to security. Suggestions are offered on ways in which NPs can safeguard confidential patient information.     

Electronic Medical Records and Electronic Health Records: Overview for Nurse Practitioners

Electronic medical records (EMRs) and electronic health records (EHRs) have become essential systems by which nurse practitioners (NPs) communicate vital patient information to other members of the health care team as well as to patients. In this article we examine the important distinctions between EMRs and EHRs; review the genesis of these types of records; summarize applicable provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act from a recent legal case centered around NP utilization of EMRs and EHRs; address open patient access to medical information; and examine threats to security. Suggestions are offered on ways in which NPs can safeguard confidential patient information.     

Electronic Medical Records and Electronic Health Records: Overview for Nurse Practitioners

Electronic medical records (EMRs) and electronic health records (EHRs) have become essential systems by which nurse practitioners (NPs) communicate vital patient information to other members of the health care team as well as to patients. In this article we examine the important distinctions between EMRs and EHRs; review the genesis of these types of records; summarize applicable provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act from a recent legal case centered around NP utilization of EMRs and EHRs; address open patient access to medical information; and examine threats to security. Suggestions are offered on ways in which NPs can safeguard confidential patient information.     

Electronic Medical Records and Electronic Health Records: Overview for Nurse Practitioners

Electronic medical records (EMRs) and electronic health records (EHRs) have become essential systems by which nurse practitioners (NPs) communicate vital patient information to other members of the health care team as well as to patients. In this article we examine the important distinctions between EMRs and EHRs; review the genesis of these types of records; summarize applicable provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act from a recent legal case centered around NP utilization of EMRs and EHRs; address open patient access to medical information; and examine threats to security. Suggestions are offered on ways in which NPs can safeguard confidential patient information.     

Electronic Medical Records and Electronic Health Records: Overview for Nurse Practitioners

Electronic medical records (EMRs) and electronic health records (EHRs) have become essential systems by which nurse practitioners (NPs) communicate vital patient information to other members of the health care team as well as to patients. In this article we examine the important distinctions between EMRs and EHRs; review the genesis of these types of records; summarize applicable provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act from a recent legal case centered around NP utilization of EMRs and EHRs; address open patient access to medical information; and examine threats to security. Suggestions are offered on ways in which NPs can safeguard confidential patient information.     

Electronic Medical Records and Electronic Health Records: Overview for Nurse Practitioners

Electronic medical records (EMRs) and electronic health records (EHRs) have become essential systems by which nurse practitioners (NPs) communicate vital patient information to other members of the health care team as well as to patients. In this article we examine the important distinctions between EMRs and EHRs; review the genesis of these types of records; summarize applicable provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act from a recent legal case centered around NP utilization of EMRs and EHRs; address open patient access to medical information; and examine threats to security. Suggestions are offered on ways in which NPs can safeguard confidential patient information.     

Electronic Medical Records and Electronic Health Records: Overview for Nurse Practitioners

Electronic medical records (EMRs) and electronic health records (EHRs) have become essential systems by which nurse practitioners (NPs) communicate vital patient information to other members of the health care team as well as to patients. In this article we examine the important distinctions between EMRs and EHRs; review the genesis of these types of records; summarize applicable provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act from a recent legal case centered around NP utilization of EMRs and EHRs; address open patient access to medical information; and examine threats to security. Suggestions are offered on ways in which NPs can safeguard confidential patient information.     

Electronic Medical Records and Electronic Health Records: Overview for Nurse Practitioners

Electronic medical records (EMRs) and electronic health records (EHRs) have become essential systems by which nurse practitioners (NPs) communicate vital patient information to other members of the health care team as well as to patients. In this article we examine the important distinctions between EMRs and EHRs; review the genesis of these types of records; summarize applicable provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act from a recent legal case centered around NP utilization of EMRs and EHRs; address open patient access to medical information; and examine threats to security. Suggestions are offered on ways in which NPs can safeguard confidential patient information.     

New dimensions of death

Many researchers throughout nursing history have been quoted as suggesting the relative inadequacy of care and the ill-preparedness of nurses to perform their ‘final role’ care of the terminally ill. Intensive care nurses must inevitably face performing this “final role” sometimes, often after much effort to maintain life. Control of physical symptoms can go far in caring for the dying patient but psychological needs rank high and must be dealt with. Nurses however use subtle avoidance and conversation controlling tactics whilst taking care of the dying patient's physical needs (Nicholls, 1984). This problem is related to the lack of instruction in the necessary skills of terminal care that is given to nurses.It is regrettable that nurses generally feel ill-equipped by their training to deal with the dying patient, yet Freihofer and Felton (1976) showed that a nurse's presence is particularly valued and that its importance is rated very close to physical needs by dying patients and their relatives.     

Rheumatoid Arthritis: Coping with Disability

This article explains the components of disability as related to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using an expansion of Nagi's Model of Disability (Jette, 2006) and the World Health Organization's (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). In addition, suggestions for ways in which nurses can offer patients choices in physical functional therapy and psychosocial aspects of coping with the chronicity of RA are discussed. Understanding how RA relates to the holistic management of the patient will allow nurses to modify and suggest additional measures to enhance the outcomes of patient‐centered care. Many degrees of disability exist that affect the physical and psychosocial domains of RA. Nurses should identify the primary issues influencing disability and assemble supporting resources or a multidisciplinary team to manage a person's disabilities. As nurses develop and maintain relationships with patients, they are able to follow through with the care plan continuum and recognize when modifications are needed.     

Children's nurses and nurse prescribing: a case study identifying issues for developing training programmes in the UK

Aims and objectives. (1) To develop an insight into the opportunities and barriers to nurse prescribing for a case study of children's nurses. (2) To consider the implications of independent nurse prescribing for children's nurses and the potential for nurse prescribing to be developed in acute children's care settings. (3) To use research data to develop a training strategy. Background. Nurse prescribing in the UK is evolving and current initiatives aim to extend the range and scope of prescribing. Children's nursing presents interesting challenges because of off‐license drugs. Successful nurse prescribing lies in practice area preparation, local policy and practice development and identifying precourse training needs. Design. Case study. Research questions. (1) What opportunities do children's nurses identify as being appropriate for nurse prescribing? (2) Can children's nurses identify the benefits of patient group directives and the different levels of nurse prescribing? (3) What preparation do children's nurses need for nurse prescribing? Methods. Focus group of health visitors/district nurses to inform a survey of 500 nurses working in acute and specialist care settings in a large Children's Hospital. Results. Focus group main themes – training, supervision and the development of confidence, record keeping, benefits of nurse prescribing, autonomous practice, the formulary and its use in practice. Response rate was 27%. Senior nurses and specialists identified potential benefits for their practice. Course content needed to focus on children, i.e. children's physiology and pharmokinetics. Children's nurses frequently advise junior medical colleagues on prescribing issues. Patient group directives are a useful alternative to prescribing. Conclusions. The results provide an insight into the training needs of children's nurses and specialist nurses which may be used to develop nurse prescribing training and practice. Training may need to be targeted at senior nurses/specialist nurses initially to develop a critical mass to change organizational culture. Relevance to clinical practice. Pertinent for senior nurses responsible for developing children's nursing practice and services for children in acute settings.     

Korean nurses’ perceived facilitators and barriers in provision of end‐of‐life care

This study examined nurses’ perceived facilitators and barriers to end‐of‐life (EOL) care in clinical settings. The study participants were 383 Korean nurses working at tertiary hospitals. The nurses had an average of 7.6 years of clinical experience. The three highest‐scoring facilitating items were ‘family member acceptance of patient death’, ‘having time to prepare the family for the patient's expected death’ and ‘having the physician meet with the family after the patient's death to offer support and validate the given care’. The top two perceived barriers were ‘families not accepting what the physician is telling them about the patient's prognosis’ and ‘dealing with angry family members’. Nurses who had received EOL care education showed a higher score in perception of facilitators than nurses who did not receive that education. EOL care for patients and their families is a challenge; thus, continuing education should be provided to improve nursing practice.     

Promoting standardized nursing language using an electronic medical record system

Paper-based medical record systems are becoming obsolete with the advent of electronic medical record (EMR) systems. With EMRs, patient data can be accessed instantly, patients can be tracked intelligently, and safeguards can help prevent medical errors. By integrating a universal nursing language, such as the Perioperative Nursing Data Set (PNDS), into EMR systems, nurses can document the nursing care they give to patients. This allows nurses to show the value of their role in the OR, promote nursing, and explain how their actions help meet National Patient Safety Goals. The transition to an EMR system for Jackson Health System, Miami, is discussed, including integration of the PNDS into the EMR system.     

Personal digital assistants change management more often than paper texts and foster patient confidence.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid retrieval of information, including drug treatment options, is critical to emergency department practice. OBJECTIVES: To assess feasibility and patient acceptance of personal digital assistants and to determine the scope of management changes. METHODS: Emergency medicine residents (EMRs, n = 18) and emergency medicine attending (EMAs, n = 12) used personal digital assistants with drug database and clinical references. Text versions were also available in the emergency department. We did a prospective, random, cross-over time-motion study, recording retrieval time, source, and changes to patient care for 16 and 8 h for EMRs and EMAs, respectively. We surveyed patients for confidence in EMRs and EMAs with personal digital assistants, and perceived efficiency. RESULTS: EMRs accessed paper (n = 131) or personal digital assistant (n = 181) information on 92.3% of patients (n = 17, both). They accessed personal digital assistant on 61.4% of patients vs. 44.5% with texts (odds ratio 1.99, 95% confidence interval 1.4-2.80). Mean access times were 9.3 and 9.4 s, respectively, +1.4 for both. Personal digital assistant access was 75%/25% between pharmacopeia and clinical resource. Personal digital assistants changed drug choice in 39/181 patients (21.5%), and other management (diagnosis, treatment or disposition) in 15/181 patients (8.3%). Odds ratio for change in management for personal digital assistant vs. paper was 2.00 (95% confidence interval 1.11-3.60). We surveyed patient perception for 198 of 295 patients (67.1%). Fifty percent reported more confidence in their EMRs and EMAs with a personal digital assistant, while 5% reported less confidence. Sixty percent agreed strongly that there is too much medical information to remember. CONCLUSIONS: Personal digital assistants are feasible in an academic emergency department and change management more often than texts. EMRs accessed personal digital assistants more often than paper texts. Patient perceptions of physicians who use personal digital assistants are neutral or favorable.