Third-line rescue therapy with levofloxacin after two H. pylori treatment failures

AIM: Eradication therapy with proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxicillin fails in a considerable number of cases. A rescue therapy still fails in more than 20% of the cases. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a third-line levofloxacin-based regimen in patients with two consecutive Helicobacter pylori eradication failures. METHODS: Design: Prospective multicenter study. Patients: In whom a first treatment with omeprazole-clarithromycin-amoxicillin and a second with omeprazole-bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole (or ranitidine bismuth citrate with these antibiotics) had failed. Intervention: A third eradication regimen with levofloxacin (500 mg b.i.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.), and omeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.) was prescribed for 10 days. Outcome: Eradication was confirmed with 13C-urea breath test 4-8 wk after therapy. RESULTS: One-hundred patients were initially included, and nine were lost for follow-up. All patients but five took all the medications correctly. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were 66% (95% CI = 56-75%) and 60% (50-70%). Adverse effects were reported in 25% of the patients, mainly including metallic taste (8%), nausea (8%), myalgia/arthralgia (5%), and diarrhea (4%); none of them were severe. CONCLUSION: Levofloxacin-based rescue therapy constitutes an encouraging empirical third-line strategy after multiple previous H. pylori eradication failures with key antibiotics such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, and tetracycline.     

Eradication rates of helicobacter pylori infection with second-line treatment: non-ulcer dyspepsia compared to peptic ulcer disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Initial proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is less effective in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) than those with peptic ulcer disease (PUD). To date, there have been no studies on the difference in eradication rates in NUD compared to PUD with regard to second-line therapy. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the difference in eradication rates of a second-line quadruple therapy for NUD and PUD patients. METHODOLOGY: Between June 2003 and December 2005, patients who failed to respond to initial PPI-based triple therapy, received 7 days of quadruple therapy (PPI b.i.d., bismuth 300mg q.i.d., metronidazole 500mg t.i.d., tetracycline 500mg q.i.d.) as a second-line treatment regimen. Four weeks after the completion of the course of medication, a 13C-urea breath test was performed for detection of H. pylori. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients received second-line quadruple therapy. Of these, 43 patients had NUD and 44 patients had PUD (19 gastric ulcers, 23 duodenal ulcers, 2 both ulcers). The eradication rates were 76.7% (33/43) in the NUD group and 90.9% (40/44) in the PUD group by per-protocol analysis. Therefore, the eradication rates in the NUD group were significantly lower than those in the PUD group (p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: A 7-day bismuth-based second-line quadruple therapy for H. pylori infection was less effective in patients with NUD than those with PUD. Therefore, a more potent second-line treatment regimen or extension of treatment duration of quadruple therapy should be considered for the eradication of H. pylori in patients with NUD.     

Duration of the metronidazole-containing regimen for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in northern Japan

Metronidazole is often used to eradicate clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori. The aim of this study was to determine the appropriate duration of metronidazole-containing treatment for the eradication of H. pylori infection in northern Japan. We enrolled 83 H. pylori-positive patients in whom first-line triple therapy consisting of a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin had failed. Prior to the second-line therapy, patients underwent endoscopy to obtain H. pylori strains to test the susceptibility to antibiotics. Patients were administered lansoprazole (30 mg b.d.), amoxicillin (750 mg b.d.) and metronidazole (250 mg b.d.) for 5 or 7 days, and the treatment results were tested by (13)C-UBT. None of the isolated H. pylori strains was amoxicillin- or metronidazole-resistant. All the patients completed the regimen without major adverse effects. The eradication rate was 95.1% (39/41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 83.5-99.4%) in the 41 patients who were treated for 5 days and 95.2% (40/42; 95% CI, 83.8-99.4%) in the 42 patients treated for 7 days. The results suggest that 5 days could be a sufficient duration for triple therapy of lansoprazole, amoxicillin and metronidazole as a second-line H. pylori eradication therapy in areas where metronidazole-resistant strains are rare.     

One-week therapy with pantoprazole versus ranitidine bismuth citrate plus two antibiotics for Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: A combination of omeprazole plus amoxycillin (Amo) and clarithromycin (CIa) for 7 days has been studied extensively. However, the role of other proton pump inhibitors, such as pantoprazole (Pan), in this therapy is not well known. On the other hand, ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) also seems to be effective when combined with Amo and CIa. Our aim was to evaluate and to compare these two novel short-term triple therapies (Pan+Amo+Cla and RBC+Amo+Cla) for treatment of Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: In a randomized clinical trial 150 consecutive patients (38 with duodenal ulcer, 112 with non-ulcer dyspepsia) infected by H. pylori were studied prospectively. Exclusion criteria were: previous H. pylori eradication therapy, gastroerosive drug use, gastric surgery, and associated diseases. One of two regimens was given for 7 days: Pan (40 mg b.i.d.), Amo (1 g b.i.d.), Cla (500 mg b.i.d.) (group Pan+Amo+Cla, n = 75); or RBC (400 mg b.i.d.), Amo (1 g b.i.d.), Cla (500 mg b.i.d.) (group RBC+Amo+Cla, n = 75). All drugs were administered together after meals. Compliance was evaluated by return tablet count. Data were analysed by univariate (chi2) and multivariate (multiple logistic regression) analysis. Eradication was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test 1 month after completing therapy. RESULTS: The distribution of studied variables (age, gender, smoking, duodenal ulcer/non-ulcer dyspepsia) was similar in both therapy groups. Per-protocol eradication was achieved in 48/71 (68%) in group Pan+Amo+Cla, and in 61/70 (87%) in group RBC+Amo+Cla (P= 0.01). Intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication was achieved in, respectively, 48/ 75 (64%) and in 61/75 (81%) (P= 0.03). The RBC+ Amo+Cla regimen was more effective than Pan+Amo+Cla in non-ulcer dyspepsia patients (ITT, 84% vs 58%; P = 0.005), but statistically significant differences were not demonstrated in duodenal ulcer patients (72% vs 80%). In the multivariate analysis the odds ratio for the effect of the type of therapy on H. pylori eradication in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia was 3.8 (95% Cl, 1.6-9.3; P = 0.003). No relevant adverse effects were reported with any regimen. CONCLUSION: A RBC+Amo+Cla regimen for only 1 week is a promising therapy for H. pylori infection, due to its high efficacy, simple posology, and excellent tolerability. Combination of Pan with Amo and Cla, although effective in duodenal ulcer patients, but in non-ulcer dyspepsia has not achieved the favourable results previously reported with other proton pump inhibitors.     

Levofloxacin-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori re-treatment: Role of bacterial resistance

BACKGROUND: First-line Helicobacter pylori therapy fails in more than 20% of patients. Quadruple therapy is the suggested second-line therapy, but bismuth salts are not anymore available worldwide. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a levofloxacin-amoxycillin triple therapy as a second-line treatment, and the role of primary levofloxacin resistance. METHODS: Forty patients, in whom first treatment with either standard 10-day triple or sequential therapy had failed, received 10-day triple therapy with rabeprazole (20mg b.d.), levofloxacin (250mg b.d.), and amoxycillin (1g b.d.). Cure rates were evaluated by the (13)C-urea breath test. Primary levofloxacin resistance was detected by culture. RESULTS: Bacterial culture was available in 33 (82.5%) out 40 patients, and primary levofloxacin resistance was detected in 10 (30.3%) patients. Overall, 33 of 40 patients accepted to participate in this study, and all returned for follow-up after therapy. Compliance to the therapy was safe except 1 patient only who stopped earlier the treatment due to side effects (oral candidiasis). H. pylori infection was eradicated in 24 patients, accounting for a 72.7% (95% CI: 57-88) eradication rate at both intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses. The eradication rate was higher in patients harbouring levofloxacin-susceptible than resistant strains (75% versus 33.3%; P=0.074). CONCLUSIONS: The eradication rate achieved by a levofloxacin-based re-treatment seems to be decreasing, and its efficacy is reduced in presence of levofloxacin resistance.     

Ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapies as a second-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori in Turkish patients

BACKGROUND: Quadruple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline is recommended as the optimal second-line therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection in the Maastricht Consensus Report. The aim of the present paper was to evaluate the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based regimens as second-line therapies after failure of the standard Maastricht triple therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixteen H. pylori-positive patients were given omeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d., and amoxicillin 1 g b.d for 10 days. Patients remaining H. pylori-positive (n = 29) were combined with 27 patients enrolled after an initial eradication failure from proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin and clarithromycin therapy for at least 7 days and were randomly given one of the following second-line 10-day treatments: RBC 400 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (RAC group, n = 28) and RBC 400 mg b.d., metronidazole 500 mg b.d and tetracycline 500 mg b.d. (RMT group, n = 28). Eradication was assessed by either histology and rapid urease test or (13)C urea breath test 8 weeks after therapy. RESULTS: The eradication rate of first-line Maastricht therapy was 67% for intention-to-treat analysis (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58-75). Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication was achieved in 60.7% of patients (95%CI: 42-79) in the RAC group and in 85.7% of patients (95%CI: 73-98) in the RMT group (P = 0.03). Fifty-three percent of patients in the RAC and 50% of patients in the RMT group experienced at least one slight side-effect (P = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: RMT is an effective and well-tolerated second-line therapy after H. pylori eradication failure from PPI, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection]

Significant progress and new insights have been gained since Helicobacter pylori was found in 1982. Even with currently most effective treatment regimen, about 10-20% of patients will fail to obtain the eradication of H. pylori infection. This review will focus on the empirical treatment for H. pylori infection in Korea. Seven days triple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) has been the main first line therapy for H. pylori infection in Korea after the recommendation by Korean H. pylori study group in 1998. Such triple therapy has been the effective regimen for eradication of H. pylori infection. However, the efficacy of 7 days proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin therapy becomes lower and various eradication rates probably reflects the increase in antimicrobial resistance, recently. The recent multi-center prospective randomized study and meta-analysis showed 14 days proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin therapy is more effective than 7 days or 10 days therapy. In the case of failure, quadruple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, a bismuth salt, metronidazole and tetracycline) is a very effective second-line regimen. After the failure of two or more eradication treatments, bacterial resistance to antibiotics should be evaluated and the regimen of third-line therapy should be selected according to each antimicrobial susceptibility. The empirical third-line therapies, recommended in the cases that antimicrobial susceptibility test is unavailable, are unclear of its validity at present in Korea. The triple therapies including rifabutin, moxifloxacin, or levofloxacin or dual therapy including high dose proton pump inhibitor and amoxicillin are needed to be proven as possible candidates for the empirical third-line therapy. Multiple eradication failures should be handled on a case-by-case basis by specialists.     

Efficacy of levofloxacin-based triple therapy as second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Bismuth-based quadruple therapy for second-line eradication treatment achieves the eradication rate ranging from 70% to 81% due to antimicrobial resistance and poor compliance. The aim of this study was to compare the eradication rate of levofloxacin-based triple therapy with that of bismuth-based quadruple therapy in second-line Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy. METHODS: Seventy-six outpatients with persistent H. pylori infection after first-line triple therapy were enrolled in this prospective randomized trial. The subjects were randomized to receive levofloxacin 300 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and pantoprazole 20 mg, given twice daily for 7 days (LAP group), or metronidazole 500 mg twice, tetracycline 500 mg four times, and pantoprazole 20 mg twice, bismuth subcitrate 600 mg twice daily for 7 days (MTPB group). Eradication was confirmed with (13)C-urea breath test or rapid urease test 4 weeks after the cessation of therapy. RESULTS: Among Seventy-six patients initially included, eleven were lost during follow-up. The eradication rates, expressed as intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses, were 51.6% and 53.3% in the LAP group, and 48.9% and 62.9% in the MTPB group, respectively. There was no significant difference in H. pylori eradication rates between the two groups (p=0.815 by ITT, p=0.437 by PP). LAP regimen was better tolerated than MTPB regimen with lower incidence of side effects (10.0% versus 31.4%, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication rates of levofloxacin-based triple therapy and bismuth-based quadruple therapy were not significantly different in second-line H. pylori eradication therapy, and low incidence of side effects was observed in levofloxacin-based triple therapy.     

An alternative salvage regimen for Helicobacter pylori-resistant patients with heart failure

Helicobacter pylori infects over 50% of the worldwide population. For eradication, European, Canadian, and American guidelines recommend a regimen consisting of a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, and metronidazole or amoxicillin dosed twice daily for at least 7 days. When this treatment strategy fails, a complex, multidosed bismuth-based quadruple regimen is recommended. Unfortunately, for patients with heart failure, this salvage regimen can be potentially hazardous due to the drug-drug interaction with tetracycline and digoxin, as well as the large salicylate content with bismuth subsalicylate. As H. pylori infection is so prevalent, providers will most likely encounter such a therapeutic dilemma. A safe, effective, and simplistic alternative is a 10-day fluoroquinolone-based regimen consisting of a proton pump inhibitor, levofloxacin and either clarithromycin or amoxicillin. Levofloxacin demonstrates excellent bioavailability, widespread tissue and fluid distribution, extended half-life, limited drug interaction profile, low incidence of side effects, and remarkable activity against H. pylori with minimal primary resistance. Compared to the 7-day quadruple regimen, a 10-day levofloxacin-based regimen demonstrated a greater eradication rate, better tolerability, and a lower rate of therapy discontinuation. We briefly provide a summary of the data regarding this levofloxacin-based regimen and two successful cases from our heart failure clinic.     

Levofloxacin- versus metronidazole-based rescue therapy for H. pylori infection in Japan

BACKGROUND: The ideal second-line treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection may differ between the areas, countries and races. AIM: The aim was to confirm which was the better regimen for second-line therapy after treatment failure with a standard triple therapy in Japan, a high dosage of levofloxacin- or metronidazole-based therapy. PATIENTS: Sixty outpatients with persistent H. pylori infection after a standard triple therapy were enrolled in this prospective, open-label and randomised trial. METHODS: The subjects were randomly administered levofloxacin (300 mg b.d.)- or metronidazole (500 mg b.d.)-based therapy with lansoprazole (30 mg b.d.) and amoxicillin (1000 mg b.d.) for 7 days, and the cure rates and side effects were analysed. Antimicrobial susceptibility was also examined before second-line therapy using the E-test. RESULTS: Good compliance was obtained without severe side effects in both the groups except for two patients. The cure rates, expressed as intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively, were 70.0 and 72.4% in the levofloxacin group, and 96.7 and 100% in the metronidazole group. Each regimen often overcame even clarithromycin-resistant strains. CONCLUSION: Metronidazole-based triple therapy is recommended as second-line therapy in Japan, and levofloxacin-based therapy can be an alternative treatment option.     

The efficacy of levofloxacin based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The failure rates of first and second line therapies of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication range from 15 to 20%. This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin based triple therapy compared with standard triple or quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication in Korea. METHODS: We enrolled two hundred and sixty seven patients with presence of H. pylori infection. One hundred and forty-one patients were treated with levofloxacin based triple therapy (LAP; levofloxacin, amoxicillin, proton pump inhibitor; PPI), and 126 patients were treated with standard triple therapy (CAP; clarithromycin, amoxicillin, PPI). We retreated the patients who had failed in H. pylori eradication with standard quadruple second-line therapy (MTPB; metronidazole, tetracycline, PPI, bismuth subcitrate) or levofloxacin based therapy (LAP or LCP; levofloxacin, clarithromycin, PPI). RESULTS: In first line therapy of H. pylori eradication, the eradication rates of levofloxacin based triple therapy and standard triple therapy were 69.8% and 74.0% respectively (p=0.52). In second-line therapy, the eradication rate of levofloxacin based triple therapy and standard quadruple therapy were 62.5% and 40.0% respectively (p=0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin based triple therapy is effective as standard regimen to eradicate H. pylori infection and is useful for an alternative rescue therapy as well.     

The efficacy of bismuth containing quadruple therapy as a first-line treatment option for Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates have tended to decrease recently, mostly due to increasing antibiotic-resistance. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of bismuth-based quadruple regimen with proton pump inhibitor-based triple regimen for eradication of H. pylori. METHODS: Consecutive H. pylori-positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomized into one of two regimens: (i) bismuth subsalicylate 300 mg q.i.d., lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. and metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d. (BLTM group) for 14 days; (ii) lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. (LAC) for 14 days. Gastroscopy and (14)C-Urea breath test (UBT) were performed before enrollment, and UBT only was repeated for 6 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients were randomized into groups and 212 of them completed the protocols. The 'intention-to-treat' (ITT) and 'per protocol' (PP) H. pylori eradication rates were 70% (95%CI 61-78) and 82.3% (95%CI 74-89) in the BLTM group, and 57.5% (95%CI 48-66) and 62.7% (95%CI 53-71) in the LAC group. The BLTM treatment achieved a significantly better eradication rate compared with LAC treatment in PP analysis (82.3% vs. 62.7%, P = 0.002). Mild to severe side-effects, which were more frequent in the BLTM group, were reported in 18.2% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The bismuth-based quadruple regimen achieved a better eradication rate compared with proton pump inhibitor-based triple regimens as a first-line eradication option for H. pylori in our population.     

Levofloxacin-based triple therapy versus bismuth-based quadruple therapy for persistent Helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Levofloxacin-based triple therapy has been suggested as an alternative salvage therapy to bismuth-based quadruple therapy for persistent Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.METHODS: A search of PUBMED, EMBASE, EBM Review databases and abstracts from recent Digestive Disease Week, United European Gastroenterology Week, and European Helicobacter Study Group conferences was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing levofloxacin-based triple salvage therapy (levofloxacin + amoxicillin + PPI) to bismuth-based quadruple salvage therapy (bismuth + tetracycline + metronidazole + PPI) were selected for meta-analysis. Additionally, all prospective trials evaluating this levofloxacin-based triple therapy as salvage therapy were pooled to analyze optimal levofloxacin treatment duration and dosing. All selected trials confirmed prior treatment failure and post-salvage treatment eradication.RESULTS: Four RCTs compared a 10-day regimen of levofloxacin-based triple therapy to 7-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy (n = 391 patients). Levofloxacin-based triple therapy was superior to quadruple therapy (RR = 1.41 [95% CI: 1.25-1.59]). Levofloxacin-based triple therapy was better tolerated than quadruple therapy with a lower incidence of side effects (RR = 0.51 [95% CI: 0.34-0.75]) and side effects prompting discontinuation of therapy (RR = 0.30 [95% CI: 0.10-0.89]). Eleven trials (n = 547 patients) evaluating levofloxacin-based triple therapy demonstrated higher eradication rates with 10-day versus 7-day regimen (87%[95% CI: 82%-92%]vs 68%[95% CI: 62%-74%]) yet eight trials (n = 477 patients) demonstrated no difference with 500 mg daily versus 250 mg b.i.d. dosing of levofloxacin (81%[95% CI: 78%-89%]vs 84%[95% CI: 66%-97%]).CONCLUSIONS: A 10-day course levofloxacin triple therapy is more effective and better tolerated than 7-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy in the treatment of persistent H. pylori infection.     

Comparison of the effectiveness of quadruple salvage regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection according to the duration of treatment]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: At present, triple therapy schemes are recommended by national and international consensus conferences for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. However, even with the most effective current treatment regimens, about 10-20% of patients fail to eradicate H. pylori, necessitating alternative strategy to eradicate H. pylori in primary treatment failure. Therefore, we performed this study to evaluate the efficacy of quadruple therapy and to compare 1 and 2-week quadruple regimen as a second-line therapy. METHODS: The hospital records of 155 patients who failed to the standard triple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, clarithromycin) were reviewed retrospectively, and divided the 1 or 2 weeks OBMT regimen (omeprazole 20 mg bid, bismuth salt 120 mg qid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, tetracycline 500 mg qid). Presence of H. pylori infection and side-effects of the treatment regimen were assessed 4 weeks after the cessation of treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and eight male and 47 female (mean age, 52.2+/-15.4) patients were enrolled. The overall eradication rate of H. pylori with quadruple therapy was 83.9% and the eradication rate was similar between 1 and 2 weeks of OBMT regimen (76.8% in OBMT 1 week, 87.9% in OBMT 2 weeks, respectively p=0.110). CONCLUSIONS: Quadruple therapy is an effective salvage regimen for H. pylori eradication after the failure of standard triple therapy. One week quadruple therapy is not significantly different from 2-weeks regimen as the second-line option for H. pylori eradication.     

Recent success of pantoprazole -or lansoprazole- based clarithromycin plus amoxicillin treatment in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There are some reports showing that resistance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) to clarithromycin has increased in recent years. We aimed to investigate the current success of a most popular first-line eradication regimen by using two different proton pump inhibitors: lansoprazole and pantoprazole. METHODS: Ninety patients with H. pylori-positive functional dyspepsia were randomized to receive pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d. or lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. in addition to amoxicillin 1,000 mg and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 14 days in a multicenter study. H. pylori infection was determined by histological examination and a rapid urease test. A follow-up endoscopy was performed to assess the H. pylori eradication six weeks after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients completed the study protocol properly. The H. pylori eradication rates according to per protocol analysis were 70% in group pantoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin (28/40) and 69.2% in group pantoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin (27/39). The eradication rates according to intention to treat analysis were 62.2% and 60% in lansoprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, pantoprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin groups, respectively. The eradication rates were similar in both protocols (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The most popular first-line eradication protocols of H. pylori achieved only a moderate success in the current study. Alternative therapy options are needed instead of clarithromycin-based triple treatment for eradication of H. pylori. The choice of proton pump inhibitor is not important in the eradication rate of H. pylori.     

Second-line bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication and impact of diabetes

AIM To investigate Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rates using second-line bismuth-containing quadruple therapy and to identify predictors of eradication failure.METHODS This study included 636 patients who failed firstline triple therapy and received 7d of bismuthcontaining quadruple therapy between January 2005 and December 2015. We retrospectively demonstrated H. pylori eradication rates with respect to the year of therapy as well as demographic and clinical factors. H. pylori eradication was confirmed by a 13C-urea breath test or a rapid urease test at least 4 wk after the completion of bismuth-based quadruple therapy: proton pump inhibitor, metronidazole, bismuth, and tetracycline.RESULTS The overall eradication rates by intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis were 73.9%( 95% CI : 70.1 %- 77.4%) and 94.5% (95% CI : 92.4%-96.5%), respectively. Annual eradication rates from 2005 to 2015 were 100.0%, 92.9%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 97.4%, 100.0%, 93.8%, 84.4%, 98.9%, and 92.5%, respectively, by per-protocol analysis. A multivariate analysis showed that diabetes mellitus (OR=3.99, 95%CI: 1.56-10.20, P=0.004)was associated with H. pylori eradication therapy failure.CONCLUSION The second-line bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for H. pylori infection is still effective in Korea, and diabetes mellitus is suggested to be a risk factor for eradication failure.     

Efficacy of 14-d vs 7-d moxifloxacin-based triple regimens for second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of the 14-d moxifloxacinbased triple therapy for the second-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection.METHODS: Between 2011 and 2013, we conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 160 patients who had experienced failure of their first-line proton pump inhibitor-based eradication therapy and subsequently received the moxifloxacin-based triple therapy as a second-line eradication treatment regimen. The patients who were treated with the moxifloxacinbased triple therapy(oral 20 mg rabeprazole b.i.d., 1000 mg amoxicillin b.i.d., and 400 mg moxifloxacin q.d.) for 7 d were assigned to the RAM-7 group(n = 79) while those who took them for 14 days were assigned to RAM-14 group(n = 81). The eradication rates for both groups were determined by intentionto-treat(ITT) and per-protocol(PP) analyses. ITT analysis compared the treatment groups as originally allocated while the PP analysis including only those patients who had completed the treatment as originally allocated. Successful eradication therapy for H. pylori infection was defined as the documentation of a negative 13C-urea breath test 4 wk after the end of the eradication treatment.RESULTS: The overall ITT eradication rate was 76.2%(122/160). The final ITT eradication rates were 70.8%(56/79; 95%CI: 63.3%-77.1%) in the RAM-7 group and 81.4%(66/81; 95%CI: 74.6%-88.3%) in the RAM-14 group(P = 0.034). The overall PP eradication rate was 84.1%(122/145), and the final PP eradication rates were 77.7%(56/72; 95%CI: 70.2%-85.3%) in the RAM-7 group and 90.4%(66/73; 95%CI: 82.8%-98.1%) in the RAM-14 group(P = 0.017). The H. pylori-eradication rates in the RAM-14 group were significantly higher compared with that of the RAM-7 group according to both the ITT(P = 0.034) and the PP analyses(P = 0.017). Both groups exhibited good treatment compliance(RAM-7/RAM-14 group: 100%/100%). The adverse event rates were19.4%(14/72)and 20.5%(15/73)in the RAM-7 and RAM-14 groups,respectively(P=0.441).Adverse events occurred in 14 of the 72 patients(19.4)in the RAM-7 group and in 15 of the 73 patients(20.5)in the RAM-14 group.No statistically significant differences(P=0.441)were observed.CONCLUSION:The 14-d moxifloxacin-based triple therapy is a significantly more effective secondline eradication treatment as compared to the 7-d alternative for H.pylori infection in South Korea.     

Rifaximin Plus Levofloxacin-Based Rescue Regimen for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Background/Aims

This study assessed the efficacy of a rifaximin plus levofloxacin-based rescue regimen in patients that had failed both triple and quadruple standard regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

Methods

We treated patients for H. pylori between August 2009 and April 2011. The triple regimen consisted of combined treatment with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and pantoprazole for 1 week. For failed cases, a quadruple regimen of tetracycline, metronidazole, bismuth dicitrate, and lansoprazole for 1 week was administered. The rescue regimen for persistently refractory cases was rifaximin 200 mg t.i.d., levofloxacin 500 mg q.d., and lansoprazole 15 mg b.i.d. for 1 week.

Results

In total, 482 patients were enrolled in this study. The eradication rates associated with the first and second regimens were 58% and 60%, respectively. Forty-seven out of 58 patients who failed with the second-line regimen received rifaximin plus levofloxacin-based third-line therapy. The eradication rate for the third regimen was 65%. The cumulative eradication rates were 58%, 85%, and 96% for each regimen, respectively.

Conclusions

A rifaximin plus levofloxacin-based regimen could be an alternative rescue therapy in patients with resistance to both triple and quadruple regimens for the eradication of H. pylori.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication using tetracycline and furazolidone versus amoxicillin and azithromycin in lansoprazole based triple therapy: an open randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Optimal anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment has not yet been established. AIM: To evaluate H. pylori eradication using tetracycline and furazolidone versus amoxicillin and azithromycin in lansoprazole based triple therapy in northeastern of Brazil. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and four patients with H. pylori infection, as determined by rapid urease testing and histology, were randomly assigned to receive either: lansoprazole (30 mg q.d.), tetracycline (500 mg q.i.d.), and furazolidone (200 mg t.i.d.) for 7 days (LTF; n = 52); or lansoprazole (30 mg b.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.) for 1 week, plus azithromycin (500 mg q.d.) for the first 3 days (LAAz; n = 52). H. pylori eradication was assessed 3 months following completion of therapy by means of rapid urease testing, histology and a 14C-urea breath test. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication was achieved in 46 of 52 (88.4%, 95% CI: 77.5%-95.1%) patients in LTF group and in 14 of 52 (26.9%, 95% CI: 16.2%-40,1%) patients in LAAz group. On a per-protocol analysis, eradication rates were 91.8% (95% CI: 81.4%-97.3%) and 28.5% (95% CI: 17.2%-42.3%), respectively in LTF and LAAz groups. CONCLUSION: The LAAz regimen yielded unacceptably low eradication rates. On the other hand, the LTF scheme represents a suitable alternative for H. pylori eradication.     

How to proceed in Helicobacter pylori-positive chronic gastritis refractory to first- and second-line eradication therapy

Helicobacter pylori is a widespread disease causing most of the peptic ulcer diseases and low-grade mucosa-associated lymphoreticular tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Moreover, H. pylori is a proven environmental risk factor for gastric carcinoma and it has been recognized as a type 1 carcinogen factor. A combination of drugs has been proposed, using a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and tetracycline to treat the infection. Since 1996, according to the European guidelines, the first-line approach using PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin or metronidazole has been suggested. Seven days of quadruple therapy with PPI (or ranitidine), tetracycline, bismuth salts and metronidazole has been reserved as second-line treatment. To improve the eradication rate of the triple therapy, a different combination of the available antibiotics has been proposed, consisting of a 10-day sequential regimen. A second-line levofloxacin-amoxicillin-based triple therapy given for 10 days has been proposed, obtaining a high eradication rate, suggesting this regimen to be a suitable retreatment option in eradication failure. A third-line treatment with rifabutin-based regimen has been proposed.