Pregnant women's attitudes and knowledge in relation to access to serum-alpha-fetoprotein test

Serum-Alpha-Fetoprotein (se-AFP) screening is a controversial issue in Sweden. In some areas the test has never been offered, in others it is routinely offered to all pregnant women and there are areas where the se-AFP test has been offered but is no longer available but for very special indications. This pseudoexperimental situation was used to analyze the effects of different information environments on attitudes to and knowledge of testing procedures at the antenatal clinics, especially the se-AFP test, and anxiety of malformations. Consecutive series of pregnant women in these three areas filled in questionnaires at their first visit, in the 22nd to 24th, and the 32nd to 35th weeks of pregnancy, and after delivery. The attitudes to prenatal screening were most positive in the routine screening area and most negative in the area which previously but no longer offers the test. The level of knowledge was somewhat higher in the routine screening area at the first visit to the clinic and increased substantially, especially in the routine screening area.     

Pregnant women's attitudes toward amniocentesis before receiving Down syndrome screening results

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate pregnant women's knowledge about features of second-trimester screening for Down syndrome and to assess whether knowledge and educational level influence their attitude toward amniocentesis before receiving test results. METHODS: Pregnant Caucasian women (n = 300) <35 years old with no personal or family history of Down syndrome were surveyed. Women were randomized to 2 groups. One group of women (n = 150) were surveyed by questionnaire before consultation with specially trained midwives; the other group of women (n = 150) were surveyed after consultation. The questionnaire consisted of 3 sections: 1) participants' demographic data, 2) knowledge about prenatal screening for Down syndrome, and 3) readiness to undergo amniocentesis if there was an increased risk of Down syndrome. RESULTS: Women surveyed after consultation had greater total knowledge scores than those surveyed before consultation (p < .001). A statistically significant difference in knowledge scores in relation to educational levels was observed only in women who were surveyed before consultation (p = .007). Significantly more women were prepared to accept amniocentesis in the group surveyed after consultation (74%) than before consultation (53%; p < .001). CONCLUSION: Knowledge gained during a prescreening consultation influenced pregnant women's attitudes toward further diagnostic investigation. A smaller proportion of women who were indecisive was observed in the group surveyed after prescreening consultation. Indecisiveness was not affected by poor knowledge about screening, but rather by difficulty in knowing how they will feel and what they will do if their screening result is positive.     

Reducing Smoking in Pregnancy Among Māori Women: “Aunties” Perceptions and Willingness to Help

Māori (the indigenous people of New Zealand) women have high rates of smoking during pregnancy and 42 % register with a lead maternity carer (LMC) after their first trimester, delaying receipt of cessation support. We used a participatory approach with Māori community health workers (“Aunties”) to determine their willingness and perceived ability to find pregnant Māori smokers early in pregnancy and to provide cessation support. Three meetings were held in three different regions in New Zealand. The aunties believed they could find pregnant women in first trimester who were still smoking by using their networks, the ‘kumara-vine’ (sweet potato vine), tohu (signs/omens), their instinct and by looking for women in the age range most likely to get pregnant. The aunties were willing to provide cessation and other support but they said they would do it in a “Māori way” which depended on formed relationships and recognised roles within families. The aunties’ believed that their own past experiences with pregnancy and/or smoking would be advantageous when providing support. Aunties’ knowledge about existing proven cessation methods and services and knowledge about how to register with a LMC ranged from knowing very little to having years of experience working in the field. They were all supportive of receiving up-to-date information on how best to support pregnant women to stop smoking. Aunties in communities believe that they could find pregnant women who smoke and they are willing to help deliver cessation support. Our ongoing research will test the effectiveness of such an approach.     

昆明地区孕产妇、医务人员HIV母婴垂直传播相关知识、态度对比分析

为了解孕妇及医务人员对HIV母婴垂直传播的知识、态度，为开展孕产妇宣传教育，开展阻断母婴垂直传播自愿检测、咨询及药物治疗提供依据。采用问卷对昆明地区238名孕产妇及227名医务人员进行了HIV母婴传播相关知识、态度及行为的调查。结果发现：昆明地区大部分孕产妇及医务人员了解并认识艾滋病相关认识，赞同将HIV检测列入婚检、产前检查，并自愿接受检测。但医务人对阻断母婴垂直传播知识了解甚少，还存在歧视HIV感染者现象，临床服务中存在较高职业危险暴露行为。建议逐步在婚检、产前检查中试行HIV自愿检测，加强医务人员对HIV垂直传播及HIV职业暴露防护的知识技能培训，尽快在重点地区探索开展降低孕产妇HIV垂直传播模式。     

产妇孕期被动吸烟现况及有关被动吸烟的KAP研究

目的:了解产妇孕期被动吸烟现况及其有关被动吸烟的知识、态度及行为(KAP)。方法:采用随机抽样的方法于2005年4～8月对长沙市5家医院住院分娩的620名产妇进行面对面的问卷访谈,收集产妇孕期被动吸烟的情况及有关被动吸烟的KAP。结果:产妇孕期被动吸烟率为38.9%,烟雾主要来源是家中,其次为打麻将场所;产妇有关被动吸烟的知识平均得分为(5.32±2.08)分(总分12分);其态度有70.2%的产妇认为丈夫应该戒烟,91.0%认为公共场所应该禁烟;对吸烟者采取的行为以回避为主,不同场所的回避率为53.8%～76.6%,而敢于主动劝阻的较少。结论:产妇孕期被动吸烟率较高,烟雾主要来源是在家中,产妇有关被动吸烟的知识掌握不够深入,对于别人吸烟的态度虽然是正面的,但是能够真正采取有效行为避免被动吸烟的很少。     

Why do women decline prenatal screening and diagnosis? Australian women's perspective

In this paper, we examine reasons for declining both prenatal screening, and diagnosis among a small group of pregnant women in Victoria, Australia. Semi-structured questionnaires were used to elicit women's account of their refusals of offers during pregnancy. Previous literature suggests that women decline prenatal screening and diagnosis because they are against abortion and the medicalisation of pregnancy, and have conoerns about the health and well-being of their fetuses. Women in this study had similar reasons but they also had other reasons for declining. Most clearly was that related to 'risk' brought about by the prospect of knowledge gained from undertaking prenatal screening and diagnostic tests, which would cause emotional distress and lead to further difficult decisions. The results have implications for the development and expansion of prenatal screening and diagnosis for pregnant women in Australia and elsewhere. We are not suggesting that prenatal screening and diagnosis is a problem for all women or even most women. However, health service providers must provide information about prenatal screening and diagnosis that is appropriate for all pregnant women, presenting all options, including that of not having any screening or diagnostic test. In doing so we will be facilitating the opportunity for women to make an informed choice and acknowledging the existence and importance of this small, but concerned group of women.     

HIV Testing Among U.S. Women During Prenatal Care: Findings from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth

Objectives: To measure progress toward the US Public Health Service recommended goal that HIV screening be part of the routine battery of prenatal tests for all pregnant women, using data from a nationally-representative reproductive health survey. Methods: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) measure self-reported prenatal HIV testing for all women who had a completed pregnancy in the 12 months before interview. We estimated the percentage with a prenatal test for categories defined by major socio-economic groups, HIV risk, knowledge of HIV treatment, and access to health care. Results: Sixty-nine percent of 748 recently pregnant women reported receiving a prenatal HIV test. The percentage tested was significantly higher for women with incomes below 300% of the poverty level (76%) and women who reported some degree of HIV risk (82%), suggesting that prenatal care providers offer and encourage testing based on perceived risk, even though universal HIV screening is recommended. Testing was also higher among women with knowledge of interventions to prevent perinatal HIV transmission (74%), suggesting that more public information on these treatments might be helpful. Conclusions: A national estimate indicates that nearly one in 3 recently pregnant women reported they were not tested for HIV during prenatal care. Studies showing that prenatal testing for other infectious diseases can approach 100% suggest that a similar level of testing is attainable for perinatal HIV screening, particularly if it is incorporated into the routine package of prenatal tests and procedures offered to all pregnant women.     

孕妇对孕妇学校教育模式及课程内容需求

目的:探讨孕妇对孕妇学校授课模式及课程内容需求情况。方法:对在汕头市妇幼保健院孕妇学校听课的200名孕妇进行问卷调查。结果:①对孕妇学校授课的模式需求是多样化的,需求最高的为听讲座,其他依次为观看录像、与医护人员一对一交流、现场示范、模仿操作、参观产房、角色扮演等。②对孕妇学校课程内容需求最高的是新生儿喂养及新生儿的护理方面,其次是分娩知识及产褥期保健知识、胎儿发育过程及自我监护知识、孕产期营养、孕期常见问题应对知识方面。结论:顺应孕妇的需求,多安排孕妇最迫切需求的课程内容,设置多元化的授课方式,更有效地为孕产妇服务。     

Attitudes towards antenatal vaccination,Group B streptococcus and participation in clinical trials: Insights from focus groups and interviews of parents and healthcare professionals

IntroductionAntenatal vaccination has become a part of routine care during pregnancy in the UK and worldwide, leading to improvements in health for both pregnant women and their infants. However, uptake remains sub-optimal. Other antenatal vaccines targeting major neonatal pathogens, such as Group B streptococcus (GBS), the commonest cause of sepsis and meningitis in the neonatal period, are undergoing clinical trials but more information is needed on how to improve acceptance of such vaccines.MethodsQualitative study using focus groups and interviews; involving 14 pregnant women, 8 mothers with experience of GBS, and 28 maternity healthcare professionals. Questions were asked regarding antenatal vaccines, knowledge of GBS, attitudes to a potential future GBS vaccine and participation in antenatal vaccine trials.ResultsAll participants were very cautious about vaccination during pregnancy, with harm to the baby being a major concern. Despite this, the pregnant women and parents with experience of GBS were open to the idea of an antenatal GBS vaccine and participating in research, while the maternity professionals were less positive. Major barriers identified included lack of knowledge about GBS and the reluctance of maternity professionals to be involved.InterpretationIn order for a future GBS vaccine to be acceptable to both pregnant women and the healthcare professionals advising them, a major awareness campaign would be required with significant focus on convincing and training maternity professionals.     

Mammogram uptake and barriers among Palestinian women attending primary health care in North Palestine

BackgroundBreast cancer affects women''s lives worldwide, yet early detection is an effective strategy for reducing mortality. The participation of women in mammography screening is linked to their knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers.ObjectivesOur study aims to assess mammography screening uptake and barriers among women attending primary healthcare centres (PHCs) in northern Palestine.MethodsUsing an interviewer administered questionnaire, we used a cross-sectional study design to determine mammography screening uptake, knowledge and barriers among 357 women attending PHCs in Northern Palestine between December 2018 and March 2019.ResultsThe mean age was 50 years. The majority (69.2%) were considered to have adequate knowledge about breast cancer and mammography screening. Mammography screening uptake among the participants was 37%. Almost 85% of the women had a positive attitude towards breastfeeding as a prophylaxis factor against breast cancer, while the most frequent barrier to mammography screening was that the participants believed they did not have any symptoms (28.6%), followed by 22.1% of them who did not want to know if they had breast cancer.ConclusionThe findings of this study highlighted the low mammography uptake among Palestinian women despite the adequate knowledge of those women and the fully accessible and free screening programme. Hence, interventional strategies should be implemented at several levels to enhance mammogram uptake.     

What participants understand about a maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening program.

We investigated the knowledge of pregnant women participating in a maternal serum alphafetoprotein (MSAFP) screening program for the detection of neural tube defects (NTDs) in the fetus. Women participating in the screening program scored higher on two knowledge tests than a comparison group of pregnant women who were not offered screening. However, there were substantial gaps in the knowledge base of women in the program, as measured by one of the tests. Women did not misinterpret a negative test result to mean that the test had identified a potential problem with the fetus; instead, there is a suggestion that they tended to interpret a negative result too positively, as an assurance that the baby was healthy in all respects.     

Screening HIV in pregnancy: a survey of prenatal care patients

BACKGROUND: Women in Canada, as in the rest of the world, represent an increasing proportion of new HIV positive cases. In 2002, women accounted for 25% of all positive HIV tests reported in Canada; with the majority being in their childbearing years (15 to 39 years), perinatal transmission of HIV in Canada is cause for concern. Following the development of interventions that can effectively reduce vertical transmission rate, prenatal screening of HIV has become the first and most pivotal step in the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission. The purpose of this study was to assess how women's knowledge and attitudes regarding HIV and HIV screening in pregnancy influence screening rates. METHOD: A prospective anonymous survey of 231 women attending antenatal care clinics at a teaching university hospital or in a community clinic was conducted. RESULTS: In general, pregnant women supported universal HIV screening in the prenatal period. Women who previously had been tested for HIV and who did not perceive that they were at risk for contracting HIV were more likely to decline HIV testing in their current pregnancy. Overall knowledge regarding HIV and its transmission is less than optimal, particularly among those women who declined HIV testing. CONCLUSION: Knowledge gaps exist between women accepting and declining prenatal HIV screening, particularly relating to benefits of screening. These results suggest that efforts have to continue to be put into educating the public but also, importantly, into changing current attitudes.     

Informed choice in bowel cancer screening: a qualitative study to explore how adults with lower education use decision aids

Background Offering informed choice in screening is increasingly advocated, but little is known about how evidence‐based information about the benefits and harms of screening influences understanding and participation in screening. Objective We aimed to explore how a bowel cancer screening decision aid influenced decision making and screening behaviour among adults with lower education and literacy. Methods Twenty‐one men and women aged 55–64 years with lower education levels were interviewed about using a decision aid to make their screening decision. Participants were purposively selected to include those who had and had not made an informed choice. Results Understanding the purpose of the decision aid was an important factor in whether participants made an informed choice about screening. Participants varied in how they understood and integrated quantitative risk information about the benefits and harms of screening into their decision making; some read it carefully and used it to justify their screening decision, whereas others dismissed it because they were sceptical of it or lacked confidence in their own numeracy ability. Participants’ prior knowledge and beliefs about screening influenced how they made sense of the information. Discussion and conclusions Participants valued information that offered them a choice in a non‐directive way, but were concerned that it would deter people from screening. Healthcare providers need to be aware that people respond to screening information in diverse ways involving a range of literacy skills and cognitive processes.     

Interrogating the dynamics between power, knowledge and pregnant bodies in amniocentesis decision making

A common assumption is that women who decline prenatal testing distrust biomedicine and trust embodied/experiential knowledge sources, while women who accept testing trust biomedicine and distrust embodied/experiential sources. Another major assumption about prenatal testing utilisation is that women who are open to abortion will undergo prenatal testing while those who are opposed to abortion will decline testing. Yet, previous research has produced inconsistent findings as to what, if anything, distinguishes women who accept or decline the offer of prenatal diagnosis. Analysing interviews with 147 pregnant women, this paper questions these assumptions about the role of abortion views and pregnant women's relative trust in various knowledge sources on their decisions to accept or decline an amniocentesis offer after a positive result on an initial diagnostic screening. We found that pregnant women's attitudes toward different knowledge sources were equally, if not more, important factors than abortion views in affecting whether individual women accepted or declined amniocentesis. At the same time, our data reveal that the relationship between 'expert' and 'lay' knowledge sources is often complex and synergistic.     

Pregnancy Intentions Among Women Who Do Not Try: Focusing <Emphasis Type="SmallCaps">o</Emphasis>n Women Who Are Okay Either Way

Are women who are intentional about pregnancy (trying to or trying not to get pregnant) systematically different from women who are “okay either way” about getting pregnant? We use a currently sexually active subsample (n = 3,771) of the National Survey of Fertility Barriers, a random digit dialing telephone survey of reproductive-aged women (ages 25–45) in the United States. We compare women who are trying to, trying not to, or okay either way about getting pregnant on attitudes, social pressures, life course and status characteristics using bivariate analyses (chi-square tests for categorical and ANOVA tests for continuous variables). Multivariate multinomial logistic regression provides adjusted associations. Most women say that they are trying not to get pregnant (71%) or are okay either way (23%); few are trying to get pregnant. Among women with no prior pregnancies (n = 831), more say that they are trying to get pregnant (14%) but a similar percentage are okay either way (26%). Several characteristics distinguish those trying to from those okay: fertility intentions, importance of motherhood, age, parity, race/ethnicity and self identifying a fertility problem. Additional characteristics are associated with trying not to get pregnant compared to being okay: ideal number of children, wanting a baby, trusting conception, relationship satisfaction, race ethnicity, economic hardship, and attitudes about career success. Women who are “okay either way” about pregnancy should be assessed separately from women who are intentional (trying to, trying not to) about pregnancy.     

A prospective cohort study investigating psychosocial predictors of attendance at a mobile breast screening service

Abstract: This study aimed to examine whether knowledge, attitudes and concerns predicted attendance at the mobile Breast X-Ray Programme in Sydney. A cohort study design was used, whereby women were surveyed prior to the implementation of the program, and two years later records were checked to determine whether they had attended for screening. Telephone interviews were sought with randomly selected women aged 45 to 70 years living in the central Sydney area (the screening van's catchment area). A total of 285 women was surveyed (response rate: 50 per cent). Of these, 86 (30 per cent) subsequently attended at the mobile van and 199 did not. Attendance did not appear to be related to any of the following factors: knowledge; attitudes; prior experience; perceived susceptibility and morbid concern in relation to breast cancer; the amount of information about screening mammography to which a woman had been exposed. The results are interpreted in light of methodological considerations plus findings from our other research.     

Quality of life, optimism/pessimism, and knowledge and attitudes toward HIV Screening among pregnant women in Ghana.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to explore optimism/pessimism, knowledge of HIV, and attitudes toward HIV screening and treatment among Ghanaian pregnant women. METHOD: Pregnant women in Accra, Ghana, completed a self-administered questionnaire including the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R, an optimism/pessimism measure), an HIV knowledge and screening attitudes questionnaire, the Short Form 12 (SF-12, a measure of health-related quality of life [HRQOL]), and a demographic questionnaire. Data were analyzed using t-tests, ANOVA, correlations, and the chi2 test. RESULTS: There were 101 participants; 28% were nulliparous. Mean age was 29.7 years, and mean week of gestation was 31.8. All women had heard of AIDS, 27.7% had been tested for HIV before this pregnancy, 46.5% had been tested during this pregnancy, and 59.4% of the sample had ever been tested for HIV. Of those not tested during this pregnancy, 64.2% were willing to be tested. Of all respondents, 89% said they would get tested if antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) were readily available and might prevent maternal-to-child transmission. Neither optimism/pessimism nor HRQOL was associated with attitudes toward HIV screening. Optimism was negatively correlated with HIV knowledge (p = .001) and was positively correlated with having never been tested before this pregnancy (p = .007). CONCLUSION: The relationship between optimism/pessimism and HIV knowledge and screening behavior is worthy of further study using larger samples and objective measures of testing beyond self-report.