Utility of routine trauma CT in the detection of bladder rupture

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency with which routine computed tomography (CT) fails to depict bladder rupture, the potential utility of delayed CT scans, and whether these findings might be useful in determining which patients may require subsequent cystography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cystograms and abdominal and pelvic CT scans of 54 patients with blunt trauma and in whom bladder rupture was clinically suspected were retrospectively reviewed. Blind readings of CT scans were performed by two genitourinary radiologists. Cystograms were used as the standard. RESULTS: Cystograms depicted bladder rupture in 10 patients. On CT scans, extravesical fluid was depicted in all three patients with intraperitoneal bladder rupture (although only a small amount of pelvic intraperitoneal fluid was present in two of these patients), in all seven patients with extraperitoneal bladder rupture, and in 32 of the 44 patients without bladder injury. Contrast material had been excreted into the bladder at the time of the initial or delayed CT in eight patients with bladder rupture; however, extravasation was identified in only four of the eight. In two of the four patients without extravasation, the bladder was distended at the time of CT. No bladder injuries were found in the 12 patients in whom pelvic fluid was not identified on CT scans. CONCLUSION: The absence of pelvic fluid on a trauma CT scan indicates that bladder rupture is unlikely. Even when a partially opacified bladder is passively distended, bladder injury may be present despite the absence of contrast material extravasation.     

Bowel and mesenteric injury following blunt abdominal trauma: evaluation with CT

Computed tomography (CT) used in cases of blunt abdominal trauma has been found sensitive in detection of bowel and mesenteric injuries and discrimination of operable from nonoperable candidates. In 51 patients with suspected bowel or mesenteric injury following blunt abdominal trauma, CT correctly depicted bowel hematoma or mesenteric injury in 17 of 19 nonoperable patients (89%) and severe injuries in one patient who died preoperatively. In 26 of 28 patients who underwent therapeutic laparotomy (93%), initial CT enabled identification of surgically confirmed injuries. In two cases, initial scan misinterpretation delayed diagnosis of serious bowel injuries. The correct interpretation was rendered preoperatively and at blind retrospective review. CT findings that correlated with bowel or mesenteric injury requiring surgery were free peritoneal fluid (27 of 28, 96%), mesenteric infiltration (24 of 28, 86%), thick-walled bowel (17 of 28, 61%), associated abdominal injuries (12 of 28, 43%), and free air (nine of 28, 32%). In nonoperable cases, CT scans demonstrated bowel thickening (84%) but less frequently peritoneal fluid (21%), mesenteric infiltration (26%), or associated injuries (5%). In three of four patients who underwent nontherapeutic laparotomy, preoperative CT correctly imaged the limited abdominal injuries.     

CT of intestinal injuries following blunt trauma]

We retrospectively reviewed 53 CT scans in 42 patients with surgically proven intestinal injury following blunt abdominal trauma. Free air and localized low density fluid were specific signs of intestinal injury. Free peritoneal fluid without a known source, thickened bowel wall, and thickened mesentery were non-specific ones. Specific and non-specific findings were demonstrated in six (22%) and 23 (85%) of 27 CT scans performed within four hours following trauma, and 19 (73%) and 26 (100%) of 26 CT scans performed after four hours, respectively. CT is useful for the diagnosis of blunt intestinal injuries, but early diagnosis is difficult because of the lack of specific signs.     

Frequency and importance of transverse process fractures in the lumbar vertebrae at helical abdominal CT in patients with trauma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency and importance of transverse process fractures of lumbar vertebrae identified at helical computed tomography (CT) in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Helical abdominal CT scans in 536 consecutive patients with a history of blunt abdominal trauma were prospectively evaluated for transverse process fractures of the lumbar spine. The number and level of fractures were categorized and correlated to the retrospective and initial interpretations of the radiographs obtained at original trauma examination. Number and type of associated abdominal injuries were recorded. RESULTS: CT scans showed transverse process fractures in 39 (7.3%) patients. Seventy-nine fractures were identified (single fractures in 12 patients, multiple fractures in 27). Fractures were right-sided in 13 patients, left-sided in 24, and bilateral in two. Transverse process fractures of the L3 vertebra were most common (n = 25). Fractures were not reported in 20 (61%) of 33 initial radiographic assessments. Even at retrospective review, only 30 (57%) of 53 fractures were correctly identified. Transverse process fractures were associated with abdominal injuries in 20 (51%) patients; this association was statistically significant (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Initial conventional radiography is relatively insensitive in the detection of transverse process fractures of the lumbar spine. There is a statistically significant association between transverse process fractures and abdominal injury.     

Small bowel rupture after blunt trauma: Computed tomographic signs and their sensitivity

The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristic computed tomographic (CT) signs of small bowel perforation after blunt abdominal trauma and to evaluate their sensitivity. Nineteen preoperative CT scans were obtained from 16 patients with surgically proven small bowel rupture secondary to blunt abdominal trauma. Only the CT findings described in the original CT reports were used. Eleven of 19 CT scans (58 %) had findings that were unequivocal for bowel rupture (i.e., extraluminal air and/or extravasation of oral contrast medium). Seven CT scans (37 %) had findings that were suggestive of severe small bowel injury (i.e., focal small bowel wall thickening and/or free peritoneal fluid without other accompanying organ injuries). In all, 95 % of cases of small bowel rupture had either pathognomonic or suggestive CT findings. One CT scan did not demonstrate small bowel wall thickening, although a hemoperitoneum was present. CT is a sensitive method for suggesting severe small bowel injury and rupture secondary to blunt abdominal trauma.     

Visceral injury without hemoperitoneum: A limitation of screening abdominal sonography for trauma

Abdominal sonography for the detection of hemoperitoneum has become increasingly popular as a screening test for visceral injury after blunt trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency, severity, and clinical significance (outcome) of abdominal organ injuries that occur without hemoperitoneum on the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma patients.During a 12-month period, 3392 blunt trauma patients were admitted to our center. Sonographic studies were performed as an initial screening evaluation to determine the presence of hemoperitoneum in 772 (22.7%) of these patients. Abdominal visceral injuries were verified by computed tomography (CT) or surgery in 196 (5.8%) of all blunt trauma admissions. Sonography, CT, and operative findings were reviewed to determine the presence or absence of hemoperitoneum in patients with abdominal injury. Patients with abdominal visceral injury without hemoperitoneum were further analyzed to identify the type of injury and the management required.A total of 246 abdominal injuries were identified in 196 patients. Fifty (26%) patients with abdominal visceral injuries diagnosed by admission CT scan had no evidence of hemoperitoneum. Admission sonography performed in 15 (30%) of these 50 patients also showed no evidence of hemoperitoneum. Visceral injuries detected by CT in the patients without hemoperitoneum included 22 of 100 splenic injuries (22%), 18 of 91 hepatic injuries (20%), 12 of 26 renal injuries (46%), and 1 of 9 mesenteric injuries (11%). Surgery was required to manage injuries in 10 of these patients.Up to 26% of blunt trauma patients with abdominal visceral injuries do not have associated hemoperitoneum identified on admission abdominal CT or sonography. Dependence on hemoperitoneum as the sole criterion of abdominal visceral injury after blunt trauma will result in falsely negative examinations and will miss potentially significant injuries.     

钝性肝脾肾损伤的CT平扫与增强扫描比较

目的:比较CT平扫与增强扫描对肝脾肾钝性损伤的诊断能力。方法:回顾性分析临床疑似钝性肝脾肾损伤,并经手术和临床观察证实的CT平扫和增强扫描的患者84例。结果:平扫确定的损伤:肝12例,脾25例,肾5例;平扫可疑损伤:肝22例,脾15例,肾5例。增强确定的损伤:肝32例,脾40例,肾12例(全肾梗塞1例,局限性梗塞3例);对比剂外溢(活动性出血)3例;无可疑损伤。平扫无异常而增强确定有损伤:肝10例,脾5例,肾2例。增强显示的损伤灶比平扫范围明显大、病灶多、界限清楚。结论:CT增强扫描显示肝脾肾损伤明显优于平扫,延时扫描有助于发现活动性出血,应常规增强扫描。     

Blunt bowel and mesenteric trauma: role of clinical signs along with CT findings in patients’ management

Background

Bowel and/or mesentery injuries represent the third most common injury among patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Delayed diagnosis increases morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of clinical signs along with CT findings as predictors of early surgical repair.

Material and methods

Between March 2014 and February 2017, charts and CT scans of consecutive patients treated for blunt abdominal trauma in two different trauma centers were reread by two experienced radiologists. We included all adult patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis with CT findings of blunt bowel and/or mesenteric injury (BBMI). We divided CT findings into two groups: the first included three highly specific CT signs and the second included six less specific CT signs indicated as “minor CT findings.” The presence of abdominal guarding and/or abdominal pain was considered as “clinical signs.” Reference standards included surgically proven BBMI and clinical follow-up. Association was evaluated by the chi-square test. A logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Thirty-four (4.1%) out of 831 patients who sustained blunt abdominal trauma had BBMI at CT. Twenty-one out of thirty-four patients (61.8%) underwent surgical repair; the remaining 13 were treated conservatively. Free fluid had a significant statistical association with surgery (p?=?0.0044). The presence of three or more minor CT findings was statistically associated with surgery (OR?=?8.1; 95% CI, 1.2–53.7). Abdominal guarding along with bowel wall discontinuity and extraluminal air had the highest positive predictive value (100 and 83.3%, respectively).

Conclusion

In patients without solid organ injury (SOI), the presence of free fluid along with abdominal guarding and three or more “minor CT findings” is a significant predictor of early surgical repair. The association of bowel wall discontinuity with extraluminal air warrants exploratory laparotomy.

     

Helical CT of diaphragmatic rupture caused by blunt trauma

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of helical CT with sagittal and coronal reformatted images in detecting diaphragmatic rupture after blunt trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chest and abdominal helical CT scans obtained in 41 patients with suspected diaphragmatic injury after major blunt trauma were reviewed by three observers who were unaware of surgical findings. Coronal and sagittal reformatted images were reviewed for each patient as well. Findings consistent with diaphragmatic injury, such as waistlike constriction of abdominal viscera (i.e., the "collar sign"), intrathoracic herniation of abdominal contents, and diaphragmatic discontinuity were recorded. Sensitivity and specificity of helical CT were calculated on the basis of surgical findings and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Helical CT was performed preoperatively in 23 patients with diaphragmatic rupture (left, n = 17; right, n = 5; bilateral, n = 1). An additional 18 patients underwent helical CT to further evaluate suspicious findings seen on chest radiography at admission and were found to have an intact diaphragm. Sensitivity for detecting left-sided diaphragmatic rupture was 78% and specificity was 100%. Sensitivity for the detection of right-sided diaphragmatic rupture was 50% and specificity was 100%. The most common CT finding of diaphragmatic rupture was the collar sign, identified in 15 patients (sensitivity, 63%; specificity, 100%). Diaphragmatic discontinuity was seen in four patients. CONCLUSION: Helical CT, especially with the aid of reformatted images, is useful in the diagnosis of acute diaphragmatic rupture after blunt trauma. Helical CT can be used to detect 78% of left-sided and 50% of right-sided injuries.     

Retroperitoneal fluid resulting from rapid intravascular resuscitation in trauma: CT mimic of retroperitoneal injury

Objective: We postulate that retroperitoneal fluid density (RFD) observed on computed tomography (CT) following blunt abdominal trauma can result from aggressive intravascular volume resuscitation. The purpose of this study was to determine associated CT findings useful in distinguishing RFD related to rapid intravascular volume expansion from primary retroperitoneal injuries that produce a similar CT appearance. Subjects and Methods: All admission CT scans performed for blunt abdominal trauma over a 13-month period demonstrating RFD were reviewed. If CT findings, as determined by consensus of the authors, clearly indicated a primary retroperitoneal injury to account for the RFD, such as duodenal or pancreatic injury, the study was excluded from further analysis. There were 11 patients with RFD whose CT scans showed no primary retroperitoneal injury. The admission and any follow-up CT studies of these 11 patients were assessed for CT signs of intravascular volume expansion. Medical records were reviewed to determine the quantity and rate of intravenous (IV) fluid administration, serum amylase level(s), and operative findings if performed. Results: All 11 patients had CT signs of intravascular volume expansion including periportal low density in the liver (11 patients), distention of the inferior vena cava (11 patients), and diffuse edema of the small bowel (7 patients). Identification of RFD as edema was confirmed directly at celiotomy in 3 patients and by rapid resolution of RFD on follow-up CT in 8. No follow-up CT showed evidence of delayed retroperitoneal hemorrhage or signs of primary retroperitoneal injuries. Postadmission IV fluids were administered at 210 to 2400 ml/hr (mean 840 ml/hr) at the time of CT with total volume resuscitation from 4.7 to 57.0 L (mean, 11.6 L) given over a 24-hour period postadmission. Serial serum amylase levels did not show a rising trend to suggest pancreatic injury. paConclusion: The CT demonstration of RFD after blunt trauma suggests primary retroperitoneal injury, including the bowel, pancreas, kidneys, and cisterna chyli, and could prompt exploratory laparotomy. However, if this CT finding is accompanied by periportal low density, vena caval distention, or diffuse bowel edema, it suggests that RFD results from interstitial edema related to aggressive IV resuscitation. If no other clinical or CT evidence of primary retroperitoneal injury is identified, these patients should be managed conservatively.     

增强CT对腹部实质脏器损伤的诊断价值

目的：探讨增强CT扫描检查对腹部实质脏器损伤的诊断价值。方法：回顾性分析63例经手术、血管造影及CT随访证为腹部钝性损伤病人的平扫及增强CT表现征象,并比较分析各种征象的作用。结果：本组63例中,11例（2例脾损伤,3例肝损伤,6例肾损伤）平扫换明显异常,增强CT扫描呈明显的低工改变;11例器官内或周围斑点状造影剂外渗,提示为活动性出血;29例增强 CT扫描后清楚显示裂伤部位,结论：增强CT检查对肝肾损伤的诊断明显优于平扫,还可以判断有无活动性出血等情况,对损伤程度的判断和治疗方案的制定较平扫更有价值。     

CT imaging signs of surgically proven bowel trauma

The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and interobserver agreement of individual CT findings as well as the bowel injury prediction score (BIPS) in surgically proven bowel injury after blunt abdominal trauma. This HIPAA-compliant retrospective study was IRB approved and consent was waived. All patients 14 years or older who sustained surgically proven bowel injury after blunt abdominal trauma between 1/1/2004 and 6/30/2015 were included. Admission trauma MDCT scans were independently interpreted by two abdominal fellowship-trained radiologists who recorded the following CT findings: intraperitoneal fluid, mesenteric hematoma/fat stranding, bowel wall thickening/hematoma, active intravenous contrast extravasation, free intraperitoneal air, bowel wall discontinuity, and focal bowel hypoenhancement. Subsequently, the electronic medical records of the included patients, admission abdominal physical exam results, admission white blood cell count, and findings at exploratory laparotomy of the included patients were recorded. Thirty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The incidence and interobserver agreement of the CT findings were as follows: intraperitoneal fluid 93.9 %, kappa?=?0.784 (good); mesenteric hematoma/fat stranding 84.8 %, kappa?=?0.718 (good); bowel wall thickening/hematoma 42.4 %, kappa?=?0.491 (moderate); active IV contrast extravasation 36.3 %, kappa?=?1.00 (perfect); free intraperitoneal air 21.2 %, kappa?=?0.904 (very good), bowel wall discontinuity 6.1 %, kappa?=?1.00 (perfect); and focal bowel hypoenhancement 6.1 %, kappa?=?0.468 (moderate). An absence of the specified CT findings was encountered in 9.1 % with surgically proven bowel injuries (kappa?=?1.00, perfect). In our study, 9/16 patients or 56.3 % had a bowel injury prediction score (BIPS) of 2 or more as defined by McNutt et al. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78(1):105–111, 2014). The presence of intraperitoneal fluid and mesenteric hematoma/fat stranding are the most common CT findings in bowel injuries proven at laparotomy. A small percentage of patients have no abnormal CT findings. This grading system did not prove to be useful in our study likely due to our inherently small patient population; however, the use of BIPS deserves further investigation as it may help in identifying blunt bowel and mesenteric injury patients with often subtle or nonspecific CT findings.     

Blunt splenic trauma in adults: CT-based classification and correlation with prognosis and treatment

Nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury in children is a well-established method to salvage splenic function; however, nonsurgical management of adult blunt splenic trauma remains controversial. To assess the value of preoperative abdominal CT in predicting the outcome of blunt splenic injury in adults, a CT-based injury-severity score consisting of four grades was devised and applied in 39 adult patients with blunt splenic injury as the sole or predominant intraperitoneal injury detected with preoperative CT. While patients with high grades of splenic injury generally required early surgery, eight (35%) of 23 patients with initial grade 3 or 4 injury were treated successfully without surgery, and four (29%) of 15 patients with grade 1 or 2 injury initially treated nonsurgically required delayed celiotomy (n = 3) or emergency rehospitalization. Results show that while CT remains an accurate method of identifying and quantifying initial splenic injury, as well as documenting progression or healing of critical injury, CT cannot reliably help predict the outcome of blunt splenic injury in adults. Treatment choices should therefore be based on the hemodynamic status of the patient and results of serial laboratory and bedside assessments.     

Prospective evaluation of handheld ultrasound in the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the Sonosite 180 handheld ultrasound in the diagnosis of haemoperitoneum in blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: Trauma ultrasound using the Focused Assessment with Sonar for Trauma (FAST) technique was performed using the Sonosite 180 handheld ultrasound during the primary survey of adult patients triaged to the resuscitation room with multiple trauma or suspected abdominal injury. The ultrasound findings were compared against the investigation of choice of the attending surgeon/accident & emergency physician--CT, DPL, laparotomy or clinical observation. RESULTS: 50 patients who had sustained blunt abdominal trauma were evaluated using FAST. Satisfactory images were obtained in 96%. There were 5 true positive scans confirmed by CT, DPL or laparotomy. There were no false negative or false investigations. The sensitivity and specificity of handheld FAST was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Handheld ultrasound using the Sonosite 180 system can be successfully used by appropriately trained doctors as the primary investigation in the acute evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.     

Changes in splenic size after abdominal trauma

After blunt abdominal trauma, the spleen often increases in volume on serial computed tomographic (CT) scans. To determine the frequency and significance of such enlargement, the authors performed a retrospective analysis of 44 hemodynamically stable patients who had experienced recent blunt abdominal trauma. The severity of splenic, hepatic, or other visceral injuries seen on each CT scan was numerically scored, and the amount of intraperitoneal fluid was assessed. Twenty-five patients (57%) had over 10% enlargement (average enlargement, 56%) on follow-up scans. Increasing volume did not correlate with clinical deterioration or the need for splenectomy. It did correlate modestly with the amount of blood in the peritoneum on CT scans, the number of units of blood transfused, and two clinical indexes of systemic trauma. Therefore, an enlarging spleen is not a CT indicator of a deteriorating clinical condition. This phenomenon is most likely due to marked adrenergic stimulation after injury and changing fluid volumes.     

CT scanning of children with blunt abdominal trauma – is oral contrast useful?

Purpose: To determine the usefulness of oral contrast in CT scanning of children with blunt abdominal trauma by comparing scans performed with and without oral contrast. Methods: CT scans of 273 children with abdominal trauma and 40 without trauma were reviewed. Results: Of the trauma patients, 116 (43 %) were scanned with oral contrast, 157 (57 %) without. Among the children who underwent laparotomy, CT scanning identified 6 of 6 organ injuries in those scanned with oral contrast and 11 of 12 in those scanned without. CT scanning identified all bowel injuries. The pancreatic body and tail were significantly better visualized in scans with oral contrast. Detection of pancreatic or liver injury was not, however, significantly different in the two groups. Opacification of the bowel by contrast was significantly better in elective than in trauma patients. Conclusion: There was no difference in detection of injuries between children scanned with and without oral contrast.     

哨兵血块征:急性上腹部钝挫伤的重要征象

目的：探讨急性上腹部钝挫伤哨兵血块征的价值。方法：收集本院１９９４年１月－２０００年7月的98例上腹部损伤共119个部位的病例资料,结果：哨兵血块征共67例。依次为脾损伤53例,肝损伤8例,肠/肠系膜损伤6例。哨兵血块征为唯一征象的有14例。结论：哨兵血块征是上腹部脏器损伤诊断的一个重要征象,不仅敏感而且准确,在脾损伤尤其是肠/肠系膜损伤诊断时更重要,对临床亦有重要指导作用。     

Pediatric blunt abdominal trauma: periportal tracking at CT.

Periportal zones of decreased attenuation at computed tomography (CT) have been described in a variety of disorders. In the setting of blunt abdominal trauma, the zones have been attributed to dissection of blood along the portal tracts. Because of the observation of isolated periportal tracking (PPT) in children after blunt trauma, the authors retrospectively reviewed CT scans of the abdomen obtained in 114 children to determine the frequency of PPT, liver injury, and peritoneal fluid. PPT was present in 22% of patients (25 of 114); it was associated with liver injury in 10 and was the only liver abnormality in 15. Pathologic correlation was available in two patients: In one it revealed marked periportal lymphedema and in the other, PPT of blood. This study indicates that both hemorrhage and lymphatic edema may be represented as PPT in children after blunt abdominal injury.     

CT cystography versus conventional cystography in evaluation of bladder injury.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate prospectively the use of CT cystography, using retrograde filling of the bladder with diluted iodinated contrast material, versus conventional cystography to identify bladder injury in patients with hematuria after blunt abdominal trauma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria consisted of the adult hemodynamically stable abdominal trauma patient with hematuria referred for abdominopelvic CT and also being considered for cystography. An initial abdominopelvic CT scan using IV iodinated contrast material was obtained, as would have been done routinely in the trauma victim. A second CT scan through the pelvis was obtained after retrograde distention of the bladder with dilute iodinated contrast material. CT cystography revealing bladder injury was followed with appropriate therapy. CT cystograms not revealing injury were followed by conventional cystography. Results of patient outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: Over a 21-month period from January 1995 through September 1996, CT cystography was performed on 55 patients who presented with hematuria after blunt abdominal trauma. Five of the 55 patients had bladder injury on CT cystography. The injury in each of these five patients was confirmed intraoperatively. In the remaining 50 patients, both CT and conventional cystography did not reveal bladder injury. CONCLUSION: CT cystography is an accurate method for evaluating bladder injury in the blunt abdominal trauma victim with hematuria. CT cystography, performed in conjunction with routine CT of the abdomen and pelvis for evaluating traumatic hematuria, would therefore preclude conventional cystograms in these patients.     

Focused abdominal US in patients with trauma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of focused abdominal ultrasonography (US) in detecting abdominal injuries that require in-hospital patient treatment in the setting of blunt abdominal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One thousand ninety patients with blunt abdominal trauma were assessed with focused abdominal US within 30 minutes of arrival at the hospital. Focused abdominal US results were positive if intra- or retroperitoneal fluid was detected. Patients with negative US results and no other major injuries were observed in the emergency department for 12 hours before discharge. Patients who deteriorated clinically after negative initial US underwent repeat US and/or emergency abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT). Patients with positive or indeterminate US results underwent emergency abdominopelvic CT. RESULTS: Nine hundred seventy-four (89%) patients had negative focused abdominal US results; eight of these underwent CT. Sixty-six (6%) had positive US results. Four (0.4%) had false-negative and 19 (1.7%) had false-positive US results. Twenty-seven (2.5%) had indeterminate US results; of these, five (18.5%) had positive CT results. One hundred twenty-four (11.4%) required emergency CT. After indeterminate cases were excluded, focused abdominal US had 94% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 78% positive predictive value, 100% negative predictive value, and 95% accuracy. CONCLUSION: Focused abdominal US has a high negative predictive value for major abdominal injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma.