Health‐Related Quality of Life in Kidney Donors From the Last Five Decades: Results From the RELIVE Study

Live donation benefits recipients, but the long‐term consequences for donors remain uncertain. Renal and Lung Living Donors Evaluation Study surveyed kidney donors (N = 2455; 61% women; mean age 58, aged 24–94; mean time from donation 17 years, range 5–48 years) using the Short Form‐36 Health Survey (SF‐36). The 95% confidence intervals for White and African‐American donors included or exceeded SF‐36 norms. Over 80% of donors reported average or above average health for their age and sex (p < 0.0001). Donors' age–sex adjusted physical component summary (PCS) scores declined by half a point each decade after donation (p = 0.0027); there was no decline in mental component summary (MCS) scores. White donors' PCS scores were three points higher (p = 0.0004) than non‐Whites'; this difference remained constant over time. Nine percent of donors had impaired health (PCS or MCS score >1 SD below norm). Obesity, history of psychiatric difficulties and non‐White race were risk factors for impaired physical health; history of psychiatric difficulties was a risk factor for impaired mental health. Education, older donation age and a first‐degree relation to the recipient were protective factors. One percent reported that donation affected their health very negatively. Enhanced predonation evaluation and counseling may be warranted, along with ongoing monitoring for overweight donors.     

Adult Right-Lobe Living Liver Donors: Quality of Life, Attitudes and Predictors of Donor Outcomes

To refine selection criteria for adult living liver donors and improve donor quality of care, risk factors for poor postdonation health-related quality of life (HRQOL) must be identified. This cross-sectional study examined donors who underwent a right hepatectomy at the University of Toronto between 2000 and 2007 (n = 143), and investigated predictors of (1) physical and mental health postdonation, as well as (2) willingness to participate in the donor process again. Participants completed a standardized HRQOL measure (SF-36) and measures of the pre- and postdonation process. Donor scores on the SF-36 physical and mental health indices were equivalent to, or greater than, population norms. Greater predonation concerns, a psychiatric diagnosis and a graduate degree were associated with lower mental health postdonation whereas older donors reported better mental health. The majority of donors (80%) stated they would donate again but those who perceived that their recipient engaged in risky health behaviors were more hesitant. Prospective donors with risk factors for lower postdonation satisfaction and mental health may require more extensive predonation counseling and postdonation psychosocial follow-up. Risk factors identified in this study should be prospectively evaluated in future research.     

Complications of Living Donor Hepatic Lobectomy—A Comprehensive Report

A wider application of living donor liver transplantation is limited by donor morbidity concerns. An observational cohort of 760 living donors accepted for surgery and enrolled in the Adult‐to‐Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation cohort study provides a comprehensive assessment of incidence, severity and natural history of living liver donation (LLD) complications. Donor morbidity (assessed by 29 specific complications), predictors, time from donation to complications and time from complication onset to resolution were measured outcomes over a 12‐year period. Out of the 760 donor procedures, 20 were aborted and 740 were completed. Forty percent of donors had complications (557 complications among 296 donors), mostly Clavien grades 1 and 2. Most severe counted by complication category; grade 1 (minor, n = 232); grade 2 (possibly life‐threatening, n = 269); grade 3 (residual disability, n = 5) and grade 4 (leading to death, n = 3). Hernias (7%) and psychological complications (3%) occurred >1 year postdonation. Complications risk increased with transfusion requirement, intraoperative hypotension and predonation serum bilirubin, but did not decline with the increased center experience with LLD. The probability of complication resolution within 1 year was overall 95%, but only 75% for hernias and 42% for psychological complications. This report comprehensively quantifies LLD complication risk and should inform decision making by potential donors and their caregivers.     

Living Donor Adult Liver Transplantation: A Longitudinal Study of the Donor''s Quality of Life

We report the results of a prospective, longitudinal quality of life survey on our adult right lobe (RL) liver donors. A total of 47 donors were enrolled; a standard SF-36 form and 43 questions developed by our team were completed before donation, at 1 week, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after donation. There were no donor deaths. Twenty-nine complications occurred in 16 patients. Major complication rate was 12.8%. Employment status and personal finances were identified as major stressors. All donors who wished to return to work did so by 1 year (mean 3.4 months). Individuals reported between 0 dollars and 25,000 dollars in losses (wages, travel, lodging, etc.). Relationships with recipients and other family members were not altered significantly. Anticipated pain (predonation) was greater than actual pain reported. Donors indicated satisfaction with the donation process regardless of recipient outcome. Physical complaints were significant at 1 week and 1 month, but returned to baseline. Donor mental health remained stable. In conclusion, RL donors found the experience to be a positive one throughout the first postdonation year. The study identified areas (finances, employment and expected recipient outcomes) to be stressed as future donors are evaluated.     

Social and Financial Outcomes of Living Liver Donation: A Prospective Investigation Within the Adult‐to‐Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study 2 (A2ALL‐2)

Because results from single‐center (mostly kidney) donor studies demonstrate interpersonal relationship and financial strains for some donors, we conducted a liver donor study involving nine centers within the Adult‐to‐Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study 2 (A2ALL‐2) consortium. Among other initiatives, A2ALL‐2 examined the nature of these outcomes following donation. Using validated measures, donors were prospectively surveyed before donation and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 mo after donation. Repeated‐measures regression models were used to examine social relationship and financial outcomes over time and to identify relevant predictors. Of 297 eligible donors, 271 (91%) consented and were interviewed at least once. Relationship changes were positive overall across postdonation time points, with nearly one‐third reporting improved donor family and spousal or partner relationships and >50% reporting improved recipient relationships. The majority of donors, however, reported cumulative out‐of‐pocket medical and nonmedical expenses, which were judged burdensome by 44% of donors. Lower income predicted burdensome donation costs. Those who anticipated financial concerns and who held nonprofessional positions before donation were more likely to experience adverse financial outcomes. These data support the need for initiatives to reduce financial burden.     

The Course and Predictors of Health‐Related Quality of Life in Living Kidney Donors: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

A better understanding of the course and risk factors for impaired long‐term health‐related quality of life (HRQoL; ie, physical, psychological, and social–relational functioning) after kidney donation might help clinicians improve the care of live kidney donors. This systematic review and meta‐analysis summarizes prospective studies about the course and predictors of HRQoL in living kidney donors. Studies indicate that shortly after donation, donors have lower HRQoL, with minor to moderate changes in psychological and social–relational functioning and major changes in physical functioning. At 3–12 months after donation, HRQoL returned to baseline or was slightly reduced, particularly for fatigue, but scores were still comparable to general population norms. Results were mainly robust across surgery techniques. A limited number of studies examined risk factors for impaired HRQoL, with low psychological functioning before donation as the most consistent predictor. Based on these results, clinicians can inform potential donors that, on average, kidney donors have high long‐term HRQoL; however, donors with low psychological functioning at baseline are those most at risk of impaired long‐term HRQoL. Future studies should focus on other potentially relevant predictors of postdonation HRQoL, including donor eligibility criteria and donor–recipient relationships, to optimize screening and interventions for donors at risk.     

Psychosocial and physical outcome following kidney donation—a retrospective analysis

Living renal donation is of benefit to the allograft recipient. Careful analysis of the donor outcome is necessary with respect to the medical condition, socioeconomic status, and health‐related quality of life. All living kidney donors of the Transplant Center at Heidelberg were included. Renal function and comorbidities were assessed. HRQoL and fatigue symptoms were determined by self‐reporting validated test systems [Short‐Form 36 (SF‐36), Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI‐20), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)]. In total, 430 of 519 living renal donors were eligible to participate: 295 living donors (68.6%) provided informed consent (age at donation 49 ± 11 years) with a median time after donation of 77 (24–484) months. Renal function was lower compared with predonation (66 ± 15 ml/min vs. 88 ± 14 ml/min). Blood pressure remained stable (128 ± 14 mmHg vs. 129 ± 15 mmHg) with an increase of 56 donors receiving antihypertensive treatment (27.1% vs. 19%). The SF‐36 physical component summary score was significantly better for both genders compared with the general population; the SF‐36 mental component summary score was lower for female donors, caused by a reduced role functioning. Prevalence of fatigue was increased in female donors between the ages of 40 and 59 years. Renal function and blood pressure were as expected from previous studies. Concerning the psychosocial outcome, female donors might be at risk of impairments postdonation. Future evaluations will confirm and specify whether these results are necessary.     

Donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for children and adults has gained widespread acceptance due to the severe organ shortage. LDLT provides potential recipients with timely transplantation, but this procedure engenders a potentially significant risk to the donor. This study analyzed medical, functional, and psychological donor outcomes after LDLT. Nineteen donors (mean age 33.9 +/- 12 years), who underwent hepatectomy for LDLT (13 right lobectomy for adult LDLT) from March 1998 to November 2002, were interviewed at a median of 13 months after donation (range, 2 to 58 months). According to the Clavien System classification, major complications occurred in three donors (16%), and minor in four (21%). The mean length of hospital stay was 5.7 +/- 1.6 days. Five patients (27%) needed rehospitalization. Complete recovery was achieved at a mean time of 8.5 +/- 3.5 weeks. All 19 donors were able to return to predonation activities. The donor's relationship to the recipient and to their families was improved after donation in all cases; 12 (63%) cited a positive psychological impact on their lives. About 90% would donate again and 84% would recommend donation to someone contemplating it. In conclusion, all donors are alive and well after donation and were able to return to their predonation occupation. Most of them felt that this experience changed their lives for the better and would donate again. Donor safety and quality of life should remain the priority in all donation processes.     

Renal volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging volumetry correlates with renal function in living kidney donors pre‐ and postdonation: a retrospective cohort study

Renal function of potential living kidney donors is routinely assessed with scintigraphy. Kidney anatomy is evaluated by imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We evaluated if a MRI‐based renal volumetry is a good predictor of kidney function pre‐ and postdonation. We retrospectively analyzed the renal volume (RV) in a MRI of 100 living kidney donors. RV was correlated with the tubular excretion rate (TER) of MAG3‐scintigraphy, a measured creatinine clearance (CrCl), and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by Cockcroft‐Gault (CG), CKD‐EPI, and modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula pre‐ and postdonation during a follow‐up of 3 years. RV correlated significantly with the TER (total: r = 0.6735, P < 0.0001). Correlation between RV and renal function was the highest for eGFR by CG (r = 0.5595, P < 0.0001), in comparison with CrCl, MDRD‐GFR, and CKD‐EPI‐GFR predonation. RV significantly correlated with CG‐GFR postdonation and predicted CG‐GFR until 3 years after donation. MRI renal volumetry might be an alternative technique for the evaluation of split renal function and prediction of renal function postdonation in living kidney donors.     

Twenty four‐hour ambulatory blood pressure profiles 12 months post living kidney donation

Small blood pressure (BP) elevations may occur post kidney donation. This prospective study determined 24‐h ambulatory BP (ABP) and other cardiovascular risk factor changes in 51 living donors over 12 months postdonation. Donors also provided 24‐h urine collections for monitoring protein and creatinine clearance, 75 g oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT), and fasting lipids. Nondipping was defined as night‐day systolic (SBP) ratio ≥0.9. Baseline and 12‐month pre to postdonation comparisons were made both for dippers and nondippers. Of 51 donors, 35 were dippers and 16 nondippers. In these two groups, predonation 24‐h SBP were 115.2 ± 8 and 115.6 ± 10 mmHg; serum creatinine (SCr) 69.3 ± 12 and 71.1 ± 13 μmol/l; and 24‐h urine protein 0.12 ± 0.05 and 0.09 ± 0.03 g (all P = NS) while at 12 months, 24‐h SBP were 111.4 ± 11 and 114.3 ± 8 mmHg (P = 0.384), SCr 97.9 ± 16 and 97.7 ± 21 μmol/l (P = 0.810); and 24‐h urine protein 0.139 ± 0.09 and 0.111 ± 0.07 g/d (P = 0.360) respectively. The 24‐h SBP was significantly lower in the dippers at 12 months as compared with predonation (P = 0.036). OGTT and lipid profiles remained normal in both groups. Predonation nocturnal nondipping does not carry adverse postdonation consequences over 12 months.     

Persistent Glomerular Hematuria in Living Kidney Donors Confers a Risk of Progressive Kidney Disease in Donors After Heminephrectomy

Although glomerular hematuria is likely a sign of chronic kidney disease that will develop into overt nephropathy after donation, it remains unclear whether prospective donors with hematuria should be excluded. We reviewed the medical records of 242 donors who donated at our institution from 2001 to 2007 and surveyed the prevalence of hematuria pre‐ and postdonation. We then investigated the association of hematuria with proteinuria postdonation and trends in glomerular filtration rate. Before donation, 8.3% of 242 donors presented with persistent hematuria, a finding that was significantly associated with dysmorphic hematuria before donation. Most cases of predonation persistent hematuria persisted after donation, and the overall prevalence increased to 15.3%. During a median follow‐up period of 2.3 years after donation, 8.3% developed persistent proteinuria, with incidence being significantly higher in donors having persistent hematuria with dysmorphic red blood cells (d‐RBC) both before and after donation. Postdonation persistent hematuria with d‐RBC was also associated with a progressive decline in renal function. These results indicate that persistent glomerular hematuria is strongly associated with a higher incidence of postdonation progressive kidney disease. Potential donors with persistent glomerular hematuria should be excluded, while those with isolated hematuria need to be evaluated with heightened caution.     

Risks of Living Donor Nephrectomy

Introduction

There is good evidence that long-term graft survival is superior when living donors are used for kidney transplantation. Nevertheless, an assessment of potential risks associated with living donation is of particular interest.

Patients and Methods

In this single-center study, we evaluated the renal function of 31 kidney living donors (1997-2003) at 2-13.2 years after nephrectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate perioperative complications, renal function, new-onset proteinuria, and hypertension.

Results

Living related donation was performed in all cases. The average time after donation was 5.7 ± 2.4 years. The mean age at nephrectomy was 46.3 ± 9.0 years (range, 25-64), and 26 (83.9%) donors were females. Twelve patients (29%) were older than 50 years. The left kidney was used in 25 patients (80.6%). Surgical complications occurred in 2 patients. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decreased from 116.9 ± 23 to 77.7 ± 19.2 mL/min/1.73 m² (P < .001). Five patients (16.1%) developed a postdonation GFR between 50 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m². Patients with lower GFR values after uninephrectomy showed lower predonation values (P < .05). Older patients (>50 years) displayed lower postdonation GFR than younger ones. We did not observe an increased prevalence of low postdonation GFR over time nor significant differences in protein excretion and blood pressure.

Conclusions

Living donor nephrectomy appears to be an acceptably safe intervention. Despite a reduction in GFR, the postdonation incidence of hypertension was low and proteinuria was not observed in any donor, even among previously hypertensive patients. Rigorous donor follow-up is recommended to identify persons at risk.     

Quality of life of living kidney donors: a single-center experience

Renal transplantation improves the quality of life (QoL) of patients with end-stage renal disease. The preservation of QoL of living kidney donors is paramount. The aim of this study was to assess the QoL pre- and postdonation using Medical Outcome Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) and to compare with a control group of potential donors who did not proceed with donation. Over a period of 28 years (1978 to 2006), 82 living donor renal transplantations were performed. Of the 78 eligible donors, 66 (85%) participated in the survey. The median postdonation period was 4.6 years (range, 3 months to 27 years). Thirty eight individuals were assessed in the control group. The postdonation SF-36 scores of the donors were not statistically significantly different from those of the control group except in one out of eight dimensions, which was physical role. However, in 44/66 (66%) donors, the postdonation scores were significantly lower compared to their predonation scores because of development of comorbidities such as musculoskeletal pain, migraine, myocardial infarction, diabetes, and peptic ulcers as the time progressed since kidney donation. The age, sex, time since donation, and relationship to recipient did not affect QoL. Eighty three percentage of the donors would have donated again if possible, and 90.9% wished to encourage living kidney donation. We conclude that the QoL of living kidney donors was not different from the healthy controls, although with the passage of time, there was some deterioration of QoL due to development of comorbidities.     

Causes and timing of end‐stage renal disease after living kidney donation

End‐stage renal disease (ESRD) is a risk after kidney donation. We sought, in a large cohort of kidney donors, to determine the causes of donor ESRD, the interval from donation to ESRD, the role of the donor/recipient relationship, and the trajectory of the estimated GFR (eGFR) from donation to ESRD. From 1/1/1963 thru 12/31/2015, 4030 individuals underwent living donor nephrectomy at our center, as well as ascertainment of ESRD status. Of these, 39 developed ESRD (mean age ± standard deviation [SD] at ESRD, 62.4 ± 14.1 years; mean interval between donation and ESRD, 27.1 ± 9.8 years). Donors developing ESRD were more likely to be male, as well as smokers, and younger at donation, and to have donated to a first‐degree relative. Of donors with a known cause of ESRD (n = 25), 48% was due to diabetes and/or hypertension; only 2 from a disease that would have affected 1 kidney (cancer). Of those 25 with an ascertainable ESRD cause, 4 shared a similar etiology of ESRD with their recipient. Almost universally, thechange of eGFR over time was stable, until new‐onset disease (kidney or systemic). Knowledge of factors contributing to ESRD after living kidney donation can improve donor selection and counseling, as well as long‐term postdonation care.     

Donor evaluation,donor risks,donor outcome,and donor quality of life in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

Right lobe living donor liver transplantation (LD-LTx) is currently performed at an increasing number of transplant centers. Donor selection, donor safety, donor recovery, and postdonation psychological impairment are essential criteria to determine whether and under which conditions LD-LTx is justifiable. Before commencing the LD-LTx program, approval was obtained from the local ethics committee. Potential donors underwent a comprehensive multistep evaluation protocol to exclude any conditions that could lead to an increased operative risk. Each donation was approved by the local Living Donation Commission. Follow-up investigations were performed after 6 and 12 months. Liver regeneration was assessed by computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging scan derived volumetries. Quality of life (QOL) was investigated according to the Anamnestic Comparative Self-Assessment Scale (ACSA) before donation, and 6 and 12 months after donation. As of December 2001, 43 right lobe living donations have been performed at the Charité, Campus Virchow, Berlin. None of the donors died or has suffered life-threatening or persisting complications. All patients recovered completely. Complications occured in 8 donors (18%). The incidence of perioperative surgical complications was 9%, comprising temporary biliary leakages (n = 3; 6.8%) as well as postoperative bleeding (n = 1). Liver volume regeneration approximated 72% ± 15% of predonation volume by 6 months and 85% ± 18% (mean ± SD) by 12 months. There was no evidence of significant psychological impairment after donation. QOL increased after donation compared with the preoperative state (P < .05). In our experience, LD-LTx has proven to be a practicable and safe procedure. However, there is a considerable risk of postoperative complications. The donor selection process plays a pivotal role in preventing complications. The discussion of potential risks, especially potential life-threatening risks, must be an integral part of informed consent. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:829-837.)     

Death of recipients after kidney living donation triples donors’ risk of dropping out from follow‐up: a retrospective study

Although kidney transplantation from the donation of a living donor is a safe treatment for end‐stage renal disease, inferences about safety of living kidney donors might be biased by an informative censoring caused by the noninclusion of a substantial percentage of donors lost to follow‐up. With the aim of assessing the presence of a potential informative censoring in living kidney donation outcomes of Catalan donors for a period of 12 years, 573 donors followed and lost to follow‐up were compared. Losses of follow‐up over time were also assessed by univariate and multivariate survival analysis, along with Cox regression. Younger and older ages, and the death of their recipient differentiated those donors who were lost to follow‐up over time. The risk of dropping out from follow‐up was more than twofold for the youngest and oldest donors, and almost threefold for those donors whose recipient died. Results of studies on postdonation outcomes of Catalan living kidney donors might have overlooked older and younger cases, and, remarkably, a percentage of donors whose recipient died. If these donors showed a higher incidence of psychological problems, conclusions about living donors’ safety might be compromised thus emphasizing the necessity of sustained surveillance of donors and prompt identification of these cases.     

Long‐Term Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes in Living Liver Donors

Due to the enduring organ shortage, living donor liver transplantation has been a valuable treatment strategy for advanced liver disease patients for over 20 years. A variety of reviews have summarized the extensive data now available on medical and psychosocial risks to living donors in the aftermath of donation. However, evidence on donor medical and psychosocial outcomes beyond the first year postdonation has not been synthesized in any previous review. The evidence base on such “long‐term” outcomes has been growing in recent years. A review of this evidence would therefore be timely and could serve as an important resource to assist transplant centers in their efforts to fully educate prospective donors and gain informed consent, as well as develop appropriate postdonation clinical care and surveillance plans. We reviewed recent literature on long‐term donor outcomes, considering (a) medical outcomes, including mortality risk, rates of complications, abnormalities detected in laboratory testing, and the progress of liver regeneration; and (b) donor‐reported psychosocial outcomes reflecting physical, emotional, and interpersonal/socioeconomic well‐being, as well as overall health‐related quality of life. We summarize limitations and gaps in available evidence, and we provide recommendations for future research and clinical care activities focused on long‐term outcomes in liver donors.     

Living donors' perception of their quality of health after donation

To alleviate the long wait on the cadaveric transplant list, recipients are pursuing the option of living donation. Potential donors may have significant concerns about the decision to donate, including the quality of health after donation. This study identifies living donors' perception regarding their quality of health after donating a kidney, and identifies the perception of the adequacy of the medical follow-up after donation. In this retrospective study, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey was mailed to all kidney donors at the transplant center from January 1995 to December 1998 (n = 118). The study population scored significantly better than the US sample population in all 8 categories of the questionnaire. When comparing scores using the relationship of the donor to the recipient, mean scores of donors who were "distant relatives" were found to be lower in 7 of the 8 categories. Most donors who had follow-up after donation felt it to be excellent to good; yet 50% stated they had no healthcare follow-up after donation. Themes were identified regarding the type of follow-up donors felt they needed after donation. Donors perceived their quality of health after donation as better than the general US population. Donor follow-up needs to be emphasized and followed more systematically.     

One hundred six live kidney donors in a single German transplantation center: renal, physical, and psychological follow-up

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to analyze the psychological and physical status as well as renal outcomes of 106 live kidney donors between 1993 and 2003.MethodsWe performed general and nephrological examinations, including measurements of creatinine clearance (ClCr), proteinuria, and 24-hour blood pressure monitoring. We evaluated the psychological and general health situation using the standardized SF-36 questionnaire.ResultsWe evaluated 69/106 (65%) live kidney donors at 5.3 ± 0.4 years after donation. The reason for the 37 drop-outs were unknown current address (n = 21), refusal of study participation (n = 14), and death due to accident and suicide (n = 2). In the 69 donors renal function was well preserved: serum creatinine 1.3 ± 0.0 mg/dL; ClCr 81 ± 2 mL/min; postdonation to predonation ClCr ratio 0.73 ± 0.02; and proteinuria 104 ± 11 mg/d. None of the donors experienced renal failure, although 36/69 (52%) patients have developed de novo hypertension. Compared with normotensive donors, the hypertensive subgroup was significantly older at the time of donation (50.7 ± 1.4 vs 46.4 ± 1.6 years; P = .010) and had a longer interval since donation (6.4 ± 0.2 vs 3.9 ± 0.1 years; P = .001). SF-36 questionnaire results in live kidney donors showed higher scores regarding physical (54.3 ± 0.8 vs 49.3 ± 0.1; P = .048) and psychological health (53.8 ± 0.6 vs 50.7 ± 0.1; P = .043) compared with the average German population.ConclusionOur cohort of live kidney donors showed good renal outcomes and superior SF-36 scores in both physical and psychological health compared with the German population. The risk of de novo hypertension increased with age and time after donation. Blood pressure screening should be regularly performed especially in the long term after donation.