A double-blind placebo-controlled study of controlled release fluvoxamine for the treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder

This was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter study to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fluvoxamine in a controlled release (CR) formulation for treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder (GSAD). A total of 300 subjects with GSAD were randomly assigned to receive either fluvoxamine CR (N = 149) or placebo (N = 151) for 12 weeks. Mean changes from baseline to end point in Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), Clinical Global Impression Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), as well as the mean end point scores in Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale (PGI) were compared between the fluvoxamine CR and placebo treatment groups. Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX), adverse event, and other safety parameters were also assessed. The results demonstrated that fluvoxamine CR was significantly superior to placebo in decreasing LSAS total score (primary measure) starting at week 4. At end point, there was a mean change from baseline of -36.1 +/- 2.7 (37% reduction) in the LSAS total score in the fluvoxamine CR group compared with -27.3 +/- 2.4 (28% reduction) in the placebo group (P = 0.020 for mean change). Fluvoxamine CR was also significantly superior to placebo in SDS, CGI-S, CGI-I at end point (secondary measures). When compared with placebo, fluvoxamine CR did not cause any significant weight gain or clinically significant sexual dysfunction as measured by ASEX. In summary, fluvoxamine CR is an efficacious, safe, and well-tolerated treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder.     

Fluvoxamine treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder in Japan: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study

The efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for the treatment of social anxiety disorder (SAD) has been reported in the USA and Europe. However, no clinical investigation has been done with SSRIs in Japanese patients with SAD. This study was performed to determine the effectiveness and safety of fluvoxamine for generalized SAD (GSAD) in Japanese patients. In this double-blind study, patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for GSAD were randomized to receive treatment with fluvoxamine or placebo for 10 wk. Fluvoxamine treatment was initiated at 50 mg/d, and increased by 50 mg weekly to a maximum of 150 or 300 mg/d. The primary efficacy outcome was mean change from baseline on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale - Japanese Version (LSAS-J) total score. The secondary outcomes were response according to the Clinical Global Impressions - Global Improvement (CGI-I) score and three domains of the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS; used to assess psychosocial impairment). A total of 176 fluvoxamine-treated patients and 89 placebo-treated patients were eligible for the efficacy analysis. At week 10, the fluvoxamine-treated patients had a significantly greater reduction in the LSAS-J total score compared with placebo-treated patients (p=0.0197), with significantly more fluvoxamine recipients being at least much improved on the CGI-I scale compared with placebo-treated patients (p=0.024). Fluvoxamine-treated patients also had better responses on the SDS compared with placebo-treated patients (p=0.0208). Fluvoxamine was safe and well tolerated. These results suggest that fluvoxamine is effective for the treatment of Japanese patients with GSAD.     

Fluvoxamine-controlled release formulation for the treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder

BACKGROUND: Generalized social anxiety disorder is a highly prevalent anxiety disorder with deleterious effects on social and family relationships, as well as work performance. We report the results of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fluvoxamine controlled release (CR) to placebo in patients with generalized social anxiety disorder. METHODS: A total of 279 adult patients meeting all inclusion/exclusion criteria was recruited at 23 United States sites and randomly assigned to receive either fluvoxamine CR (100-300 mg/d) or placebo for 12 weeks. The dose could be increased, based on efficacy and tolerability, in increments of 50 mg/d at weekly intervals. The dosage remained constant during weeks 6 to 12. RESULTS: Treatment with fluvoxamine CR resulted in statistically and clinically significant improvements in symptoms associated with generalized social anxiety disorder as early as week 4 on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale and the Clinical Global Impression Scale Global Improvement, and at week 6 on the Sheehan Disability Scale, Clinical Global Impression Scale Severity of Illness and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale. The most frequent adverse events reported by patients on fluvoxamine CR were headache, nausea, somnolence, and insomnia. No weight gain was observed for either treatment group, and at end point, there were no differences between treatments on overall sexual function, as measured by the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Both physician and patient-rated scales indicate that fluvoxamine CR is effective and safe for the treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder.     

Effectiveness and tolerability of paroxetine controlled release (CR) in the treatment of major depressive disorder: an open-label, prospective, multi-center trial in Korea

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of paroxetine controlled release (CR) for the treatment of Korean patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in a naturalistic treatment setting. METHODS: One hundred and ninety patients with MDD were enrolled in this study. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 item (HAMD-17) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores were measured at the baseline (day 0) and at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 (endpoint). The primary measure of effectiveness was a change in the mean HAMD-17 scores from the baseline to the endpoint. The secondary effectiveness measures included a decrease in the HAMD-17 scores of 50% or more at the endpoint compared with the baseline and a change in the mean CGI-S scores from the baseline to the endpoint. Remission was defined as a HAMD-17 score < or = 7 at the endpoint. RESULTS: The HAMD-17 scores decreased by 56.5% (observed difference, OD = -13.3) (t = 26.63, p < 0.0001) from the baseline. The CGI-S scores also decreased by 50.0% (OD = -2.3) (t = 24.47, p < 0.0001). The response and remission rate at the endpoint was 64.2 and 48.4%, respectively. The adverse events were tolerable. No unexpected or serious side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the methodological limitations, this study demonstrated that paroxetine CR is effective and tolerable for treating patients with MDD in an East Asian population.     

Tiagabine for social anxiety disorder

Tiagabine, a selective gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) reuptake inhibitor was evaluated for the treatment of patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD). Adults with SAD received open-label tiagabine 4-16 mg per day for 12 weeks. Intent-to-treat data are available for 54 patients with improvement demonstrated in Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, Clinician Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and -Improvement (CGI-I), Social Phobia Inventory, and Sheehan Disability Scale scores. In all, 40.7% (22/54) of the intent to treat sample and 63.0% (17/27) of the completer sample were considered CGI responders (CGI-I score of one or two). Tiagabine was generally well tolerated. Results of this pilot study suggest that tiagabine may be an option for the treatment of patients with SAD. Larger, controlled studies are required to fully elucidate the potential of tiagabine for the treatment of SAD.     

Efficacy of low and higher dose extended-release venlafaxine in generalized social anxiety disorder: a 6-month randomized controlled trial

Rationale There is a need for new pharmacological treatments for generalized social anxiety disorder (GSAD), which is a common, often disabling condition.Objective To compare the efficacy and safety over 6 months duration of two dose ranges of venlafaxine extended-release (ER) with placebo in patients with GSAD.Method Twenty-eight-week, double-blind, multi-center study in 386 adult outpatients with DSM-IV GSAD. Patients were randomized to placebo, venlafaxine ER fixed low dose (75 mg/day), or venlafaxine ER flexible higher dose (150–225 mg/day). Primary efficacy variable was change on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). Secondary efficacy variables included, among others, the proportion of responders on the CGI Global Improvement Item (score 1 or 2), and the proportion of remitters (defined as an LSAS score of 30).Results Improvement on the LSAS was greater with venlafaxine ER (at 75 mg/day or 150–225 mg/day) than placebo, and was sustained throughout the 6-month trial. Of patients receiving venlafaxine ER (at any dose), 58% responded to treatment compared to 33% of those receiving placebo (P<0.001); corresponding remission rates were 31% and 16% (P<0.01). There were no differences in outcome according to venlafaxine ER dosage.Conclusions Venlafaxine ER was effective in the treatment of GSAD. The comparable efficacy at low and higher doses may indicate that norepinephrine reuptake blockade does not contribute to therapeutic effect in GSAD. This hypothesis should be tested using agents with specific actions on norepinephrine reuptake blockade.     

Agomelatine in the treatment of seasonal affective disorder

RATIONALE: The novel antidepressant agomelatine acts as a melatonergic (MT(1) and MT(2)) receptor agonist and as a serotonin-2C receptor antagonist. Previous studies showed that agomelatine is able to restore disrupted circadian rhythms, which were implicated in the pathophysiology of seasonal affective disorder (SAD). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of agomelatine in the treatment of SAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven acutely depressed SAD patients were included in an open study with agomelatine (25 mg/day in the evening) over 14 weeks. Efficacy assessments included the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (SAD version; SIGH-SAD), the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I), the Circscreen, a self-rating scale for the assessment of sleep and circadian rhythm disorders, and the Hypomania Scale. RESULTS: Agomelatine led to a progressive and statistically significant decrease of SIGH-SAD, CGI-S, and CGI-I scores from week 2 onward (p < 0.001). Furthermore, scores on the Circscreen improved significantly during the study (p < 0.001). Treatment with agomelatine over 14 weeks yielded a response rate of 75.7% (SIGH-SAD <50% of baseline value) and a remission rate (SIGH-SAD <8) of 70.3% in the intention to treat sample. Scores on the Hypomania Scale were consistently low during the study. Agomelatine showed good overall tolerability: throughout the study only one adverse event (mild fatigue) was related to the study drug. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that seasonal depression may be effectively and safely treated with agomelatine.     

Valproic acid for the treatment of social anxiety disorder

The aim of the study was to examine the efficacy of valproic acid in participants with social anxiety disorder. Following a 2-week single-blind, placebo run-in period, 17 participants were enrolled in a 12-week open flexible-dose trial of valproic acid (500-2500 mg). The primary outcome measures were the mean change from baseline in the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) total score and responder status [defined as a Clinical Global Impression of Improvement score (CGI-I) < or =2]. Social anxiety symptoms as measured by the LSAS and CGI-I scores significantly improved with treatment. The mean reduction in the LSAS was 21.3 points in the last visit carried forward analysis and 19.1 points for the completer analysis, with 41.1% and 46.6% participants, respectively, achieving responder status. The results from this open-label trial suggest the potential efficacy of valproic acid for the treatment of social anxiety disorder. Placebo-controlled trials are indicated to confirm these findings.     

Levetiracetam in social phobia: a placebo controlled pilot study

While serotonergic antidepressants are now established as first-line pharamcotherapy for generalized social anxiety disorder (SAD), other agents with different mechanisms have shown promise in treating SAD. The aim of this pilot study is to examine the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV), an anticonvulsant with calcium channel modulating properties, in treating SAD. Adult outpatients meeting DSM-IV criteria for SAD were randomly assigned (2:1) to double-blind treatment with either LEV (500-3000 mg/day) or placebo (PBO) for 7 weeks. The primary outcome measures were the change from baseline in the Brief Social Phobia Scale (BSPS) and response using the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale (CGI-I). The mean (SD) BSPS scores at baseline and endpoint were 45.4 (9.7) and 31.2 (19.7) for LEV (n=9), compared to 43.5 (8.4) and 37.8 (19.9) for PBO (n =7) (ITT; ns). Rates of response were 22% for LEV and 14% for PBO using the CGI-I. Using a BSPS response criterion (>30% reduction), response rates were 44% for LEV and 14% for PBO. The effect sizes of LEV relative to PBO were 0.33 for the BSPS and 0.50 for the LSAS. In summary, the results of this study, while negative on the pre-defined measures, suggest promise for LEV as a new treatment of SAD. Further work should be carried out with larger sample sizes and optimal dosing strategies of the drug.     

Multicentre, double-blind, comparison of fluvoxamine and clomipramine in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

The aim of this prospectively randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fluvoxamine and clomipramine in patients suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (DSM-III-R). Fourteen centres participated in this trial. Sixty-eight patients were randomized to receive fluvoxamine and 65 to receive clomipramine. The duration of the study was 10 weeks. The two treatment groups showed a marked improvement of obsessive-compulsive symptomatology, as determined by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale, the National Institute of Mental Health Obsessive-Compulsive Global Scale and Clinical Global Impression. No statistically significant differences were found between fluvoxamine and clomipramine in terms of efficacy during the study. A similar number of patients in each group withdrew from the study prematurely, but there were more dropouts due to adverse events in the clomipramine group. Concerning tolerability, there were significantly more reports of constipation and dry mouth in the clomipramine group. The results show that fluvoxamine and clomipramine have similar efficacy in the treatment of patients suffering from OCD, but fluvoxamine is better tolerated. In view of the superior safety profile of fluvoxamine compared to clomipramine in terms of a risk-benefit assessment, the use of fluvoxamine would appear to be advantageous for this patient population.     

Extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy as maintenance treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: a long-term, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) as maintenance monotherapy for patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Time-to-event (anxiety symptom recurrence; maximum 52 weeks) multicenter, randomized-withdrawal, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine XR (50-300 mg/day) following open-label run-in (4-8 weeks) and open-label stabilization (≥ 12 weeks). Primary variable: time from randomization to anxiety event. Secondary variables included: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total, HAM-A psychic/somatic anxiety factors, Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S), and Quality of Life, Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) scores; adverse events (AE) reporting. Four hundred and thirty-two patients, stabilized on quetiapine XR, were randomized to continue quetiapine XR (N=216) or switch to placebo (N=216). Risk of anxiety symptom recurrence was significantly reduced by 81% for quetiapine XR versus placebo: hazard ratio=0.19 (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.31; P<0.001). Fewer patients receiving quetiapine XR (N=22, 10.2%) than placebo (N=84, 38.9%) experienced anxiety symptom recurrence. Significant differences were observed between quetiapine XR and placebo in: HAM-A total, psychic/somatic, CGI-S (all P<0.001) and Q-LES-Q (P<0.05) scores. AEs (>10%) during open-label treatment were dry mouth, sedation, somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, and constipation. During randomized treatment, the most common AEs for quetiapine XR were headache and nasopharyngitis. Quetiapine XR monotherapy reduced the risk of anxiety symptom recurrence in patients with GAD stabilized on quetiapine XR, with tolerability results consistent with the known profile of quetiapine.     

The effects of inhibition of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) by JNJ-42165279 in social anxiety disorder: a double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept study

JNJ-42165279 is a selective inhibitor of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), the enzyme responsible for the degradation of fatty acid amides (FAA) including anandamide (AEA), palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), and N-oleoylethanolamide (OEA). We assessed the efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of treatment with JNJ-42165279 in subjects with social anxiety disorder (SAD). This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomizing subjects to 12 weeks of treatment with either JNJ-42165279 (25 mg daily) or placebo (PBO). The primary endpoint was the change in the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) total score from baseline to end of study. Secondary endpoints included the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS₁₇), and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I). Samples were collected for plasma concentration of AEA, PEA, OEA, and JNJ-42165279. A total of 149 subjects were enrolled with a mean baseline LSAS total score of 102.6 (SD 16.84). The mean change from baseline (SD) in LSAS total score at week 12 was numerically greater for JNJ-42165279: −29.4 (27.47) compared to PBO: −22.4 (23.57) but not significant. The percentage of subjects with ≥30% improvement from baseline in the LSAS total score was significantly higher for JNJ-42165279 (42.4%) compared to PBO (23.6%) (p value = 0.04). The percentage of subjects with a CGI-I score of much or very much improved was also significantly higher for JNJ-42165279 (44.1%) than for PBO (23.6%) (p value = 0.02). The drug was well tolerated. JNJ-42165279 appears to elicit an anxiolytic effect in subjects with SAD although trough concentrations with 25 mg once daily appeared to be insufficient to completely inhibit FAAH activity which may have led to suboptimal efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT02432703","term_id":"NCT02432703"}}NCT02432703.Subject terms: Drug development, Anxiety     

Mirtazapine in social anxiety disorder: a pilot study

Fourteen patients with social anxiety disorder (generalized type), according to DSM-IV criteria, were treated with mirtazapine 30 mg for 12 weeks. Twelve patients completed the study. Two patients (14.3%) dropped out due to side-effects. Generally, mirtazapine was well tolerated. Five out of 12 patients (41.7%) were classified as responders, based on a Clinical Global Improvement score of 1 or 2 and a reduction of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) of 40%. The mean total score on the LSAS, as well as the anxiety and avoidance subscores, decreased significantly. This open pilot study suggests that further investigations are warranted to prove the efficacy of mirtazapine in generalized social anxiety disorder.     

Serotonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism predicts SSRI response in generalized social anxiety disorder

Objectives To determine whether variation in the serotonin transporter gene promoter (5HTTLPR) influences the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in generalized social anxiety disorder (GSAD).Methods Consecutive series of N=32 patients with DSM-IV GSAD for whom DNA and standardized outcome data from a 12-week SSRI trial were available. After ensuring that neither clinical response [clinical global impression of change scale (CGI-C)] nor 5HTTLPR genotype was confounded by ethnicity or sex, we determined whether the number of copies (0, 1, or 2) of hi-risk alleles using either the diallelic L–S system or the triallelic La–Lg–S system, predicted response and change in Liebowitz social anxiety scale (LSAS) and brief social phobia scale (BSPS) scores during SSRI treatment.Results Twenty-one patients (66%) were responders to SSRI (i.e., CGI-C much or very much improved). A trend was seen for a linear association between 5HTTLPR genotype and likelihood of response to SSRI: diallelic classification L/L 7/8 (88%), L/S 12/18 (67%), S/S 2/6 (33%), p=0.051; triallelic classification L′/L′ 4/5 (80%), L′/S′ 14/19 (74%), S′/S′ 3/8 (38%), p=0.093. Reduction in LSAS (and BSPS) scores during SSRI treatment was significantly (p<0.02) associated with 5HTTLPR genotype using either the diallelic or triallelic classification.Conclusions Variation in a functional polymorphism known to influence serotonin reuptake is associated with SSRI response in patients with GSAD. Independent replication in larger samples is required before the predictive utility of this information can be confirmed and generalized to clinical settings.     

A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled study of escitalopram in patients with social anxiety disorder in Japan

Objective This randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram (10 and 20?mg/day) in Japanese patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD).

Research design and methods Patients aged 18–64 years with a primary diagnosis of DSM-IV-TR defined SAD, a Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Japanese version (LSAS-J) total score ≥60 and a Clinical Global Impression–Severity (CGI-S) score ≥4 at baseline were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to placebo, escitalopram 10?mg or escitalopram 20?mg. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to Week 12 in the LSAS-J total score for both escitalopram 10?mg and 20?mg versus placebo (ANCOVA, FAS, LOCF), using a hierarchical testing procedure. Pre-specified secondary endpoints included LSAS-J sensitivity analyses.

Clinical trial registration This study has the www.japic.or.jp identifier: JapicCTI-121842.

Results For the primary efficacy endpoint, the difference from placebo in the LSAS-J was ?3.9 (p?=?0.089) for escitalopram 10?mg. Since the superiority of escitalopram 10?mg over placebo was not confirmed, an analysis without multiplicity adjustment was made, which showed a difference for escitalopram 20?mg versus placebo of ?9.8 (p?<?0.001). In pre-specified sensitivity analyses, the difference versus placebo was ?4.9 (p?=?0.035) (ANCOVA, FAS, OC) and ?5.0 (p?=?0.028) (MMRM, FAS) (escitalopram 10?mg) and ?10.1 (p?<?0.001) (ANCOVA, FAS, OC) and ?10.6 (p?<?0.001) (MMRM, FAS) (escitalopram 20?mg). Common adverse events (incidence ≥5% and significantly different from placebo) were somnolence, nausea and ejaculation disorder.

Conclusion Escitalopram was efficacious, safe and well tolerated by patients with SAD in Japan. Study limitations are discussed including patient characteristics.     

Paroxetine: safety and tolerability issues

Paroxetine is a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) available in immediate release and controlled release (CR) formulations. Paroxetine is the most potent inhibitor of serotonin re-uptake among the now available SSRIs. Paroxetine has been approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive–compulsive disorder, panic disorder (PD), generalised anxiety disorder, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and social anxiety disorder (SAD) in adults, whereas paroxetine CR is approved for the treatment of MDD, SAD, PD and premenstrual dysphoric disorder in adults. The overall efficacy of paroxetine seems to be comparable to other SSRIs in the treatment of approved indications, although paroxetine treatment induces more sedation, constipation, sexual dysfunction, discontinuation syndrome and weight gain than other SSRIs. Recent data suggest that paroxetine treatment leads to increased rates of congenital malformations, although this evidence is not conclusive. Paroxetine and paroxetine CR are not indicated for use in the paediatric population and are categorised as Pregnancy Class D. In conclusion, whether the tolerability profile of paroxetine differs substantially from other new antidepressants (including other SSRIs) needs to be determined in adequately powered well-designed randomised controlled comparative clinical trials.     

Paroxetine: safety and tolerability issues

Paroxetine is a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) available in immediate release and controlled release (CR) formulations. Paroxetine is the most potent inhibitor of serotonin re-uptake among the now available SSRIs. Paroxetine has been approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder (PD), generalised anxiety disorder, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and social anxiety disorder (SAD) in adults, whereas paroxetine CR is approved for the treatment of MDD, SAD, PD and premenstrual dysphoric disorder in adults. The overall efficacy of paroxetine seems to be comparable to other SSRIs in the treatment of approved indications, although paroxetine treatment induces more sedation, constipation, sexual dysfunction, discontinuation syndrome and weight gain than other SSRIs. Recent data suggest that paroxetine treatment leads to increased rates of congenital malformations, although this evidence is not conclusive. Paroxetine and paroxetine CR are not indicated for use in the paediatric population and are categorised as Pregnancy Class D. In conclusion, whether the tolerability profile of paroxetine differs substantially from other new antidepressants (including other SSRIs) needs to be determined in adequately powered well-designed randomised controlled comparative clinical trials.     

A placebo-controlled study of sertraline in the treatment of outpatients with seasonal affective disorder

Rationale Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a relatively common cyclical depressive illness characterized by seasonal depressions during winter. The disorder is commonly responsive to light therapy, but antidepressant drug efficacy has not been definitely established. Serotonin selective re-uptake inhibitors are potentially efficacious treatments for SAD.Objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of sertraline treatment for SAD.Methods One hundred and eighty seven outpatients with seasonal pattern recurrent winter depression (DSM-III-R defined) and a minimum 29-item Hamilton depression scale (SIGH-SAD version) score of 22 were randomized to 8 weeks treatment with either sertraline or placebo in a double-blind, multi-country, multi-center, parallel-group, flexible dose (50–200 mg once daily) study. Efficacy was investigated using physician and patient-rated scales measuring depression, anxiety and symptoms characteristic of seasonal affective disorder.Results Sertraline produced a significantly greater response than placebo at endpoint as measured by changes in the 29-item and 21-item Hamilton depression scales, the clinical global impression (CGI) severity scale, the Hamilton anxiety scale, and the hospital anxiety and depression scale. The proportion of sertraline-treated subjects achieving a response on the CGI improvement rating (ratings of 1 or 2) at endpoint (last observation carried forward) was significantly greater than that of the placebo group. Overall sertraline was well tolerated with the most frequent placebo adjusted adverse events, being nausea, diarrhea, insomnia and dry mouth. Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate and transient.Conclusions Sertraline pharmacotherapy has been demonstrated to be an effective and well-tolerated therapy for out patients with SAD. As such, sertraline offers an important pharmacological option in the clinical management of this condition.The authors wrote this article on behalf of the International Collaborative Group on Sertraline in the Treatment of Outpatients with Seasonal Affective Disorder.Preliminary results from this study were presented previously at the 148th meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, Miami, Florida, 24 May 1995     

Aripiprazole as an augmentor of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in depression and anxiety disorder patients

More than half of anxiety and depression patients treated with an adequate course of antidepressants fail to fully improve. We retrospectively examined whether treatment-resistant depression and anxiety disorder patients responded to and tolerated augmentation with the atypical antipsychotic, aripiprazole. We report on patients with depression and anxiety disorders, including panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder, who had an incomplete response to a variety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and who received augmentation with aripiprazole. The primary outcome measure was the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I). In the intent-to-treat analysis, the mean+/-SD CGI-S was 3.8+/-1.3 at endpoint. Fifty-nine percent of subjects received CGI-I ratings of 1 or 2, 'much improved' or 'very much improved,' in terms of their depression and anxiety symptoms at the end of 12 weeks. Several patients showed an early (weeks 1-5), as well as sustained, response to augmentation with doses of aripiprazole between 15 and 30 mg/day. The results suggest that aripiprazole may be effective as an augmentation for patients with persistent depressive and anxiety disorders despite initial SSRI treatment. Because this is a retrospective case review, further prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.     

Moclobemide is effective and well tolerated in the long-term pharmacotherapy of social anxiety disorder with or without comorbid anxiety disorder

Social phobia (social anxiety disorder) is a highly prevalent and chronic disorder that is associated with significant comorbidity and disability. Despite recent advances in the pharmacotherapy of the disorder, there is a paucity of randomized controlled trials on patients with comorbid disorders and on maintenance treatment. A randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind multi-site trial of moclobemide, a reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A, was undertaken with 390 subjects. After an initial 12 weeks, there was the option of continuing for an additional 6 months of treatment. The primary efficacy parameter chosen was responder status as defined by the Clinical Global Impression scale change item. From week 4 onwards, there was a significantly higher response rate on moclobemide than on placebo. Superiority of medication over placebo was similar in patients with comorbid anxiety disorders (33% of subjects) and without, as well as in patients with different subtypes of social anxiety disorder; indeed, treatment with moclobemide rather than placebo was the strongest predictor of response. Adverse events were similar across treatment groups, and were typically mild and transient. In the extension phase, response rates remained higher in the moclobemide group, and ratings of tolerability were equally high in both groups. Thus, in a large sample of social anxiety disorder patients with and without comorbid anxiety disorders, moclobemide was both effective and well-tolerated in the short as well as long-term. These data confirm and extend previous findings on the value of moclobemide in the treatment of social anxiety disorder, and strengthen the range of therapeutic options for managing this important disorder.