Liver resection versus liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: a meta-analysis of 18,421 patients

BackgroundOutcomes after liver resection (LR) and liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are heterogenous and may vary by region, over time periods and disease burden. We aimed to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between LT versus LR for HCC within the Milan criteria.MethodsTwo authors independently searched Medline and Embase databases for studies comparing survival after LT and LR for patients with HCC meeting the Milan criteria. Meta-analyses and metaregression were conducted using random-effects models.ResultsWe screened 2,278 studies and included 35 studies with 18,421 patients. LR was associated with poorer OS [hazard ratio (HR) =1.44; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14–1.81; P<0.01] and DFS (HR =2.71; 95% CI: 2.23–3.28; P<0.01) compared to LT, with similar findings among intention-to-treat (ITT) studies. In uninodular disease, OS in LR was comparable to LT (P=0.13) but DFS remained poorer (HR =2.95; 95% CI: 2.30–3.79; P<0.01). By region, LR had poorer OS versus LT in North America and Europe (P≤0.01), but not Asia (P=0.25). LR had inferior survival versus LT in studies completed before 2010 (P=0.01), but not after 2010 (P=0.12). Cohorts that underwent enhanced surveillance had comparable OS after LT and LR (P=0.33), but cohorts undergoing usual surveillance had worse OS after LR (HR =1.95; 95% CI: 1.24–3.07; P<0.01).ConclusionsMortality after LR for HCC is nearly 50% higher compared to LT. Survival between LR and LT were similar in uninodular disease. The risk of recurrence after LR is threefold that of LT.     

Impact of pathological response after preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) on incidences of microvascular invasion and early tumor recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundTo study the influence of pathological responses (PR) after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) on incidences of microvascular invasion (MVI) and early recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.MethodsBetween 2013 to 2015, consecutive HCC patients who underwent liver resection with “curative” intent at three hospitals were enrolled in this study. Patients with different areas of PR after preoperative TACE were compared with those without preoperative TACE on the incidences of MVI, early recurrence rates and patterns of recurrence before and after propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsOf 1,970 patients, 737 patients who received preoperative TACE were divided into three groups according to the areas of PR: ≥90% (n=226), 60–90% (n=447), and <60% (n=64). PR ≥90% was an independent protective factor of incidences of MVI [odds ratio (OR), 0.144; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.082–0.245, P<0.001) and early recurrence (HR, 0.742; 95% CI, 0.561–0.963, P=0.032); while PR<60% was an independent risk factor of incidences of MVI (OR, 6.076; 95% CI, 3.004–11.728, P<0.001) and early recurrence (HR, 1.428; 95% CI, 1.095–1.929; P=0.009). Furthermore, patients with PR <60% were significantly more likely to develop multiple intrahepatic recurrences involving multiple hepatic segments when compared with patients without preoperative TACE.ConclusionsThis study indicated the area of PR after TACE was closely associated with the incidences of MVI and early tumor recurrence. Patients with PR <60% were at significantly higher risks of having more MVI, early and multiple tumor recurrences     

High HbA1c is a risk factor for complications after hepatectomy and influences for hepatocellular carcinoma without HBV and HCV infection

BackgroundCurrently, the population with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing worldwide. However, the influence of DM or hyperglycemia on the outcome of resected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear.MethodsWe analyzed 756 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy. These patients were assigned to an HbA1c ≥7.0% (H-A1c; n=100) or HbA1c <7.0% (L-A1c; n=656) group depending on their HbA1c level at admission. We investigated prognoses, clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes including morbidities of HCC patients with high HbA1c, prognoses according to the treatment for DM were also investigated.ResultsAmong all patients and those with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) did not differ significantly between the H-A1c and L-A1c groups. In contrast, the 5-year OS rate of the H-A1c group was 55% and that of the L-A1c group 71% among patients without HBV and HCV (NBNC patients) (P=0.03). Among NBNC patients, the median RFS of the H-A1c group was 13 months, and that of the L-A1c group was 26 months (P=0.02). In addition, metformin use was an independent favorable factor for both OS and RFS. The H-A1c group had significantly higher rates of hyperbilirubinemia, wound infection, and pneumonia.ConclusionsHCC patients with high HbA1c might have poor prognoses for both survival and recurrence in NBNC-HCC. High HbA1c may also be a risk factor for morbidities after hepatectomy. Metformin use may constitute a good option for NBNC patients with HCC.     

Characteristics and outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with macrovascular invasion following surgical resection: a meta-analysis of 40 studies and 8,218 patients

BackgroundGuidelines recommend that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) and/or hepatic vein tumor thrombosis (HVTT) should undergo systemic therapy. However, recent data suggest that surgical resection may be beneficial in selected cases, but outcomes are heterogenous. We aimed to estimate pooled overall survival (OS), recurrence free survival (RFS) and complication rates in HCC patients with macrovascular invasion (MVI) following surgical resection.MethodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, two investigators independently searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to Nov 10, 2020, without language restrictions, for studies reporting outcomes of adult HCC patients with MVI who underwent liver resection with curative intent.ResultsWe screened 8,598 articles and included 40 studies involving 8,218 patients. Among all patients with MVI, the pooled median OS was 14.39 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.99–18.84], 1-year OS was 54.47% (95% CI: 46.12–62.58%) and 3-year OS was 23.20% (95% CI: 16.61–31.42%). Overall, 1- and 3-year RFS were 27.70% (95% CI: 21.00–35.57%) and 10.06% (95% CI: 6.62–15.01%), respectively. Among patients with PVTT, median OS was 20.41 months in those with segmental/2nd order involvement compared to 12.91 months if 1st order branch was involved and 6.41 months if the main trunk was involved. The pooled rate of major complications was 6.17% (95% CI: 3.53–10.56%).ConclusionsOverall median survival was 14.39 months for HCC patients with MVI following resection. Median survival was higher in PVTT with segmental/2nd order involvement at 20.41 versus 6.41 months if the main trunk was involved.     

The benefit of curative liver resection with a selective bile duct preserving approach for hepatocellular carcinoma with macroscopic bile duct tumor thrombus

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presenting with macroscopic bile duct tumor thrombus (BDTT) is an uncommon event. The role of a curative hepatic resection and associated long-term outcomes remain controversial. In addition the necessity for bile duct resection is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of hepatectomy with a selective bile duct preservation approach for HCC with BDTT in comparison to outcomes without BDTT.MethodsA total of 22 HCC with BDTT patients who had undergone curative hepatic resection with a selective bile duct preservation approach at our institute were retrospectively reviewed. These were compared to group of 145 HCC without BDTT patients. The impact of curative surgical resection and BDTT on clinical outcomes and survival after surgical resection were analyzed.ResultsAll HCC with BDTT cases underwent major hepatectomy vs. 32.4% in the comparative group. Bile duct preservation rate was 56.5%. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of HCC with BDTT patients in comparison to the HCC without BDTT group were 81.8%, 52.8% and 52.8% vs. 73.6%, 55.6% and 40.7% (P=0.804) respectively. Positive resection margin, tumor size ≥5 cm and AFP ≥200 IU/mL were significant risk factors regarding overall survival. However, it is unclear whether presence of a bile duct tumor thrombus has an adverse impact on either recurrence free survival or overall survival.ConclusionsBile duct obstruction from tumor thrombus did not necessarily indicate an advanced form of disease. Tumor size and AFP had greater impact on long-term outcomes than bile duct tumor thrombus. Major liver resection with a selective bile duct preserving approach in HCC with BDTT can achieve favorable outcomes comparable to those of HCC without BDTT in selected patients.     

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy versus sequential transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization in staged hepatectomy for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized comparative study

BackgroundBoth portal vein embolization (PVE) and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) have merits and demerits when used in patients with unresectable liver cancers due to insufficient volumes in future liver remnant (FLR).MethodsThis study was a single-center, prospective randomized comparative study. Patients with the diagnosis of hepatitis B related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the 2 groups. The primary endpoints were tumor resection and three-year overall survival (OS) rates.ResultsBetween November 2014 to June 2016, 76 patients with unresectable HBV-related HCC due to inadequate volume of FLR were randomly assigned to ALPPS groups (n=38) and TACE + PVE groups (n=38). Thirty-seven patients (97.4%) in the ALPPS group compared with 25 patients (65.8%) in the TACE + PVE group were able to undergo staged hepatectomy (risk ratio 1.48, 95% CI: 1.17–1.87, P<0.001). The three-year OS rate of the ALPPS group (65.8%) (95% CI: 50.7–80.9) was significantly better than the TACE + PVE group (42.1%) (95% CI: 26.4–57.8) (HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26–0.98, two-sided P=0.036). However, no significant difference in the OS rates between patients who underwent tumor resection in the 2 groups of patients was found (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.35–1.83, two-sided P=0.595). Major postoperative complications rates after the stage-2 hepatectomy were 54.1% in the ALPPS group and 20.0% in the TACE + PVE group (risk ratio 2.70, 95% CI: 1.17–6.25, P=0.007).ConclusionsALPPS resulted in significantly better intermediate-term OS outcomes, at the expenses of a significantly higher perioperative morbidity rate compared with TACE + PVE in patients who had initially unresectable HBV-related HCC.     

Development of a machine learning model to predict early recurrence for hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection

BackgroundEarly recurrence is common for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgical resection, being the leading cause of death. Traditionally, the COX proportional hazard (CPH) models based on linearity assumption have been used to predict early recurrence, but predictive performance is limited. Machine learning models offer a novel methodology and have several advantages over CPH models. Hence, the purpose of this study was to compare random survival forests (RSF) model with CPH models in prediction of early recurrence for HCC patients after curative resection.MethodsA total of 4,758 patients undergoing curative resection from two medical centers were included. Fifteen features including age, gender, etiology, platelet count, albumin, total bilirubin, AFP, tumor size, tumor number, microvascular invasion, macrovascular invasion, Edmondson-Steiner grade, tumor capsular, satellite nodules and liver cirrhosis were used to construct the RSF model in training cohort. Discrimination, calibration, clinical usefulness and overall performance were assessed and compared with other models.ResultsFive hundred survival trees were used to generate the RFS model. The five highest Variable Importance (VIMP) were tumor size, macrovascular invasion, microvascular invasion, tumor number and AFP. In training, internal and external validation cohort, the C-index of RSF model were 0.725 [standard errors (SE) =0.005], 0.762 (SE =0.011) and 0.747 (SE =0.016), respectively; the Gönen & Heller’s K of RSF model were 0.684 (SE =0.005), 0.711 (SE =0.008) and 0.697 (SE =0.014), respectively; the time-dependent AUC (2 years) of RSF model were 0.818 (SE =0.008), 0.823 (SE =0.014) and 0.785 (SE =0.025), respectively. The RSF model outperformed early recurrence after surgery for liver tumor (ERASL) model, Korean model, American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (AJCC TNM) stage, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage and Chinese stage. The RSF model is capable of stratifying patients into three different risk groups (low-risk, intermediate-risk, high-risk groups) in the training and two validation cohorts (all P<0.0001). A web-based prediction tool was built to facilitate clinical application (https://recurrenceprediction.shinyapps.io/surgery_predict/).ConclusionsThe RSF model is a reliable tool to predict early recurrence for patients with HCC after curative resection because it exhibited superior performance compared with other models. This novel model will be helpful to guide postoperative follow-up and adjuvant therapy.     

Bariatric surgery is associated with reduction in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity matched analysis

IntroductionObesity is a risk factor for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Bariatric surgery can provide durable weight-loss, but little is known about the later development of NASH and HCC after surgery.MethodsBariatric surgery (n = 3,410) and obese controls (n = 46,873) from an institutional data repository were propensity score matched 1:1 by demographics, comorbidities, BMI, and socioeconomic factors. Comparisons were made through paired univariate analysis and conditional logistic regression.ResultsTotal of 4,112 patients were well matched with no significant baseline differences except initial BMI (49.0 vs 48.2, p = 0.04). Bariatric group demonstrated fewer new-onset NASH (6 0.0% vs 10.3%, p < 0.0001) and HCC (0.05% vs 0.34%, p = 0.03) over a median follow-up of 7.1 years. After risk-adjustment, bariatric surgery was independently associated with reduced development of NASH (OR 0.52, p < 0.0001).ConclusionsBariatric surgery is associated with reduced incidence of NASH and HCC in this large propensity matched cohort. This further supports the use of bariatric surgery for morbidly obese patients to ameliorate NASH cirrhosis and development of HCC.     

Liver transplantation: would it be the best and last chance of cure for hepatocellular carcinoma with major venous invasion?

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT) signifies advanced disease, whether LT confers any survival superiority over resection remains uncertain.MethodsA propensity score matched (PSM) analysis of liver transplantation (LT) and liver resection (LR) for HCC with PVTT was performed.ResultsA consecutive series of 88 patients who received either LT (10 DDLTs and 3 LDLTs) or LR (n=75) respectively were recruited. Before PSM, the LT group has a higher MELD score (17.3 vs. 7.8, P<0.001), lower serum AFP levels (96 vs. 2,164 ng/mL, P=0.017) and smaller tumour size (4 vs. 10 cm, P<0.001). The 5-year overall survival for LT and LR were 55.4% and 15.9% respectively (P=0.007). After matching for serum AFP levels and tumour size, 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival for LT were 81 ng/mL, 3.9 cm, 80%, 70% and 70% and the corresponding rates for LR were 1,417 ng/mL, 5.3 cm, 51.8%, 19,6% and 9.8% (P value =0.12, 0.27 and 0.009 respectively).ConclusionsLT is associated with significantly better oncological outcomes in HCC patients with PVTT involving the lobar or segmental level. A modest expansion of selection criteria to include small HCC with segmental PVTT should be considered.     

One- versus two-stage partial hepatectomy for large resectable solitary hepatocellular carcinomas determined preoperatively to have a narrow resection margin: a propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundFor patients with a large but resectable solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of >5 cm in diameter, it is often difficult to achieve a sufficient resection margin. There is still no study on whether a two-stage hepatectomy to increase a narrow resection margin would be beneficial.MethodsFrom August 2014 to February 2017, patients with a large but resectable solitary HCC of >5 cm and a preoperative estimated resection margin of <1.0 cm were retrospectively studied. They were divided into one- and two-stage resection groups. A retrospective analysis was performed, followed by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Disease recurrence, survival, intraoperative and postoperative data were compared.ResultsBefore PSM, the 1-, 2-, 3-and 4-year recurrence-free survival rates for the one- and two-stage groups were 44.3%, 31.7%, 24.3%, 19.2% versus 60.6%, 45.4%, 43.5%, 32.3%, respectively (P=0.007). The corresponding OS rates were 61.0%, 45.2%, 43.8%, 38.4% versus 69.6%, 62.5%, 60.7%, 57.3%, respectively (P=0.029). After PSM, the 1-, 2-, 3-and 4-year recurrence-free survival rates for the one- and two-stage groups were 44.0%, 31.5%, 27.3%, 21.0% versus 60.6%, 45.4%, 43.5%, 32.3%, respectively (P=0.013). The corresponding OS rates were 62.5%, 41.1%, 41.1%, 37.5% versus 69.6%, 62.5%, 60.7%, 57.3%, respectively (P=0.038). Differences in the resection margins between the one- and two-stage groups before [0.3 (0–0.5) versus 1.2 (0.8–2.2) cm] and after [0.2 (0–0.5) versus 1.2 (0.8–2.2) cm] PSM were also significant.ConclusionsTwo-stage hepatectomy allowed a wider resection margin for patients with a resectable but solitary HCC of >5 cm, and resulted in significantly better long-term survival outcomes after partial hepatectomy.     

Mutation profile and its correlation with clinicopathology in Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of cancer worldwide. Although many studies have focused on oncogene characteristics, the genomic landscape of Chinese HCC patients has not been fully clarified.MethodsA total of 165 HCC patients, including 146 males and 19 females, were enrolled. The median age was 55 years (range, 27–78 years). Corresponding clinical and pathological information was collected for further analysis. A total of 168 tumor tissues from these patients were selected for next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based 450 panel gene sequencing. Genomic alterations including single nucleotide variations (SNV), short and long insertions and deletions (InDels), copy number variations, and gene rearrangements were analyzed. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was measured by an algorithm developed in-house. The top quartile of HCC was classified as TMB high.ResultsA total of 1,004 genomic alterations were detected from 258 genes in 168 HCC tissues. TMB values were identified in 160 HCC specimens, with a median TMB of 5.4 Muts/Mb (range, 0–28.4 Muts/Mb) and a 75% TMB of 7.7 Muts/Mb. The most commonly mutated genes were TP53, TERT, CTNNB1, AXIN1, RB1, TSC2, CCND1, ARID1A, and FGF19. SNV was the most common mutation type and C:G>T:A and guanine transformation were the most common SNVs. Compared to wild-type patients, the proportion of Edmondson grade III–IV and microvascular invasion was significantly higher in TP53 mutated patients (P<0.05). The proportion of tumors invading the hepatic capsule was significantly higher in TERT mutated patients (P<0.05). The proportion of Edmondson grade I-II, alpha fetoprotein (AFP) <25 µmg/L, and those without a history of hepatitis B was significantly higher in CTNNB1 mutated patients (P<0.05). CTNNB1 mutations were associated with TMB high in HCC patients (P<0.05). Based on correlation analysis, the mutation of TP53 was independently correlated with microvascular invasion (P=0.002, OR =3.096) and Edmondson grade III–IV (P=0.008, OR =2.613). The mutation of TERT was independently correlated with tumor invasion of the liver capsule (P=0.001, OR =3.030), and the mutation of CTNNB1 was independently correlated with AFP (<25 µmg/L) (P=0.009, OR =3.414).ConclusionsThe most frequently mutated genes of HCC patients in China were TP53, TERT, and CTNNB1, which mainly lead to the occurrence and development of HCC by regulating the P53 pathway, Wnt pathway, and telomere repair pathway. There were more patients with microvascular invasion and Edmondson III–IV grade in TP53 mutated patients and more patients with hepatic capsule invasion in TERT mutated patients, while in CTNNB1 mutated patients, there were more patients with Edmondson I–II grade, AFP <25 µmg/L, and a non-hepatitis B background. Also, the TMB values were significantly higher in CTNNB1 mutated patients than in wild type patients.     

Downstaging and resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with extrahepatic metastases after stereotactic therapy

BackgroundA combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anti-PD-1 antibodies with local regional therapy has elicited yield substantial clinical benefits in patients who have hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with extrahepatic metastases. Using this treatment strategy to convert HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases from unresectable to resectable has not yet been reported.MethodsConsecutive hepatocellular carcinoma patients with extrahepatic metastases who received first-line therapy with a combination of TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies and at least one local regional therapy were analysed.ResultsNine patients with localized disease who received first-line systemic therapy were enrolled. At baseline, all of them had oligometastatic disease, namely, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C (or Chinese Liver Cancer stage IIIB). The most common treatment administered was lenvatinib plus anti-PD-1 antibody and transarterial chemoembolization, and the median time span from systemic therapy to surgery was 3.2 (IQR, 2.8–6.2) months. Three patients achieved a pathological complete response. Six patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, and the other 3 patients underwent open surgery. After a median follow-up of 10.2 (IQR, 8.6–20.0) months, 7 patients survived without disease recurrence, and 2 experienced tumour recurrence. All patients had any-grade AEs, and 55.6% of the patients experienced grade 3 AEs. Fatigue was the most common AE, followed by elevated aminotransferase levels and hypertension.ConclusionsStereotactic therapy is a feasible conversion therapy for HCC patients with extrahepatic metastases to become resectable. This is the first study to analyse therapeutic outcomes of patients receiving these therapies for HCC with extrahepatic metastases.     

Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and toxicity between small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and those treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).MethodsWe searched databases for relevant clinical studies. The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) at 1 and 2 years, freedom from local progression (FFLP) rate at 2 years, and complications.ResultsFive cohorts from 5 retrospective studies and 4,814 patients with HCC were included. Pooled OS at 2 years was significantly lower for SBRT than for RFA [odds ratio (OR): 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51–0.79; P<0.0001], but the pooled FFLP rate at 2 years was higher for SBRT than for RFA (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.05–2.61; P=0.03). In addition, there was no significant difference in the local and liver toxicities of the two treatments. The contradictory conclusion between the OS and FFLP outcome may be attributed to the difference in radiological dose and location, but there were no uniform criteria to illustrate the radiological dose and location in the included studies.ConclusionsSBRT had a higher local control ratio but poorer prognosis than RFA in patients with small HCC. The local toxicity was comparable in both treatments. Further trials should be designed with uniform standards for SBRT and RFA treatments.     

The role of intraoperative electron radiotherapy in centrally located hepatocellular carcinomas treated with narrow-margin (<1 cm) hepatectomy: a prospective,phase 2 study

BackgroundPostoperative radiotherapy (RT) is known to play an important role in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), but the specific role of intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) in HCCs remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of IOERT in centrally located HCCs treated with narrow-margin (<1 cm) hepatectomy.MethodsThis was a single-center, phase 2, prospective non-randomized controlled study, including 268 patients with centrally located HCCs who underwent narrow-margin hepatectomy. The patients were subsequently allocated to the IOERT group (n=59) or to the control group (n=65). The primary outcome of the study was to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the IOERT group and the control group, and the secondary outcome was to compare overall survival (OS) rate between the two groups.ResultsOf 268 patients enrolled, a total of 124 were included in the study: 59 in IOERT group, 65 in control group. The 1-, 2-, 3-year RFS rates were 79.3%, 62.1% and 45.8% for patients in the IOERT group, and 47.6%, 28.6%, and 22.9% for patients in the control group, respectively (P=0.025). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 100.0%, 94.9%, and 83.7% for patients in the IOERT group, and 92.3%, 87.5%, and 79.4% for patients in the control group, respectively (P=0.314). Subgroup analysis of MVI (+) patients revealed that RFS and OS are significantly prolonged in the IOERT subgroup as compared to the control, whereas there was no significant difference of RFS and OS between the two groups in MVI (−) patients.ConclusionsIOERT for centrally located HCCs with concurrent narrow-margin hepatectomy was feasible and safe. Statistically better RFS rate was observed in the IOERT group compared to the control group. Subgroup analysis revealed that IOERT was more beneficial for postoperative survival of HCC patients with MVI.Trial RegistrationChiCTR-TRC-12002802; www.who.int/ictrp.     

Role of C11-FDG dual-tracer PET-CT scan in metastatic screening of hepatocellular carcinoma—a cost-effectiveness analysis

BackgroundWe aimed to identify predictive factors for positron emission tomography (PET)-detected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) metastasis and a cost-effective approach to preoperative PET-computed tomography (CT) for detecting metastasis.MethodsClinicopathological and survival data of HCC patients having PET-CT with 18F-fludeoxyglucose (FDG) and 11C-acetate (ACT) following contrast-enhanced CT/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative tumor staging were reviewed. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify predictive factors for PET-detected metastasis. A cost-benefit analysis model was built for the incurred costs and the impact of PET-CT findings on treatment strategy was studied.ResultsTotally 152 patients were analyzed. Dual-tracer PET-CT detected metastasis in 17 patients (11%). By multivariate analysis, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400 ng/mL [relative risk (RR): 4.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.41–13.15, P=0.011] and bilobar disease (RR: 3.94, 95% CI: 1.24–12.52, P=0.014) were independent predictive factors for PET-detected metastasis. PET-CT findings altered the treatment strategy for 12 patients (7.9%); three partial hepatectomies, eight episodes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and one episode of ablation were avoided, with an estimated cost-saving of US $91,000, $150,000 and $10,600 respectively. Had the PET-CT been performed only for patients with AFP ≥400 ng/mL or bilobar disease (n=74), metastasis would have been confirmed in 14 patients (18.9%), and the cost-saving per patient was estimated at US $1,070.ConclusionsDual-tracer PET-CT is cost-effective and useful for preoperative HCC staging in patients with AFP ≥400 ng/mL or bilobar disease. Its routine use in preoperative workup for all HCC patients is not recommended. Unilobar disease with AFP <400 ng/mL can achieve good negative predictive value for PET-detected metastasis. Screening patients with either factor can avoid unnecessary procedures and is thus cost-effective for preoperative HCC workup.     

Antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C reduces recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma following liver transplantation

Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the major concerns following liver transplantation (LT). With the potential antitumor properties of interferon (IFN), their role in prevention of HCC recurrence is to be defined. We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients who underwent LT for hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐related HCC between January 2004 and December 2008. Twenty‐four (52.2%) patients with biopsy‐proven HCV recurrence received antiviral therapy (IFN group); their outcomes were compared with 22 patients (control group). There was no significant difference for tumor size, number, and type of neo‐adjuvant therapy between the two groups. The 1‐ and 3‐year overall patient survival (100% vs. 90.9% and 87.3% vs. 71.8%; P = 0.150) and tumor‐free survival (100% vs. 72.7% and 83.1% vs. 67.5%; P = 0.214) between IFN and control group were comparable. HCC recurrence was the most common cause of death (n = 6 of 12, 50%), all in the control group. During follow‐up, seven (15.2%) patients developed HCC recurrence: one (4.1%) in the IFN group and six (27.3%) in the control group (P < 0.05). In conclusions, HCC recurrence rate and related deaths were significantly lower in patients that received post‐transplant antiviral therapy for recurrent HCV.     

Salvage living donor liver transplantation versus repeat liver resection for patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma and Child-Pugh class A liver cirrhosis: A propensity score-matched comparison

Following curative liver resection (LR), resectable tumor recurrence in patients with preserved liver function leads to deciding between a repeat LR and a salvage liver transplantation (LT), if a donor’s liver is available. This retrospective study compared survival outcomes and recurrence pattern following salvage living donor LT (LDLT) and repeat LR in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent repeat LR (n = 163) or LDLT (n = 84) for recurrent HCC following curative resections, between January 2005 and December 2017 at a single institution. A 1:1 propensity score matching led to 42 patients per group. Disease-specific and recurrence-free survival were significantly better in the salvage LDLT group than in the repeat LR group (p = .042; HR = 2.40; 95% CI, 0.69–6.00 and p < .001; HR = 4.23; 95% CI, 2.05–8.71, respectively). Despite significant differences in recurrence patterns between the two groups (p = .019), the patient death rates, after recurrence, were similar for both groups (p = .760). This study indicates that salvage LDLT is superior to repeat LR for treating patients with transplantable, intrahepatic HCC recurrence, even in patients with Child-Pugh class A liver cirrhosis.     

Liver resection versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic vein tumor thrombus: a propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundThe presence of hepatic vein tumor thrombus (HVTT) is a major determinant of survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study compared survival outcomes between liver resection (LR) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in HCC patients with HVTT.MethodsData from patients who underwent LR or IMRT for HCC with HVTT at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Their survival outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsThree hundred and seven HCC patients with HVTT who underwent either LR (n=140) or IMRT (n=167) were enrolled. PSM matched 82 pairs of patients. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were significantly higher for patients in the LR group than those in the IMRT group. On subgroup analysis, significantly better survival outcomes were obtained after LR than IMRT in patients with peripheral type of HVTT (pHVTT) and major type of HVTT (mHVTT). However, similar survival outcomes were obtained after LR and IMRT when the HVTT had developed into inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVCTT).ConclusionsLR resulted in significantly better survival outcomes in HCC patients with HVTT when compared to IMRT. Once the HVTT had developed IVCTT, LR and IMRT resulted in similarly bad survival outcomes.     

Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence in the Posttransplant Population: A Comparison of RETREAT and Cleveland Clinic Florida Scoring System

BackgroundLiver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is curative in most cases; however, recurrence is observed in some patients. The Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) score is an externally validated scoring system for prediction of post-LT HCC recurrence. The Cleveland Clinic Florida Scoring System (CCFSS) is a potential new scoring system for prediction of HCC recurrence. Our study aimed to compare the RETREAT and CCFSS.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 52 adult patients with HCC who underwent LT at a tertiary care center. Mantel-Haenszel chi-square analyses were conducted to compare the RETREAT and CCFSS classifications for detecting HCC recurrence.ResultsA total of 52 patients underwent LT. The median follow-up period was 37 months. Four patients had post-LT HCC recurrence, with all recurrences occurring within 2 years of LT. The RETREAT score was better able to detect low, moderate, and high levels of risk (P < .001), compared to the CCFSS score (P = 0.480). Both risk scores had a sensitivity of 75%; the specificity of the RETREAT score was 95.8%, whereas the specificity of the CCFSS was 60.4%. Alpha-fetoprotein level at the time of LT was associated with HCC recurrence (P = .014).ConclusionsThis is the first study to evaluate the CCFSS as a potential new scoring system to predict HCC recurrence after LT. The RETREAT score is more specific than the CCFSS. The incorporation of alpha-fetoprotein level at the time of LT improves the estimation of HCC recurrence in the post-LT period.     

Hepatocellular carcinoma: Can it be considered a controversial indication for liver transplantation in centers with high rates of hepatitis C?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still considered a controversial indication for liver transplantation (LT), mainly because of long waiting times and underlying viral cirrhosis. The goal was to evaluate the outcome of LT in 104 patients with HCC and cirrhosis, mainly hepatitis C virus (HCV)–related, in a center with a short waiting time (median, 105 days). Four groups were formed according to the HCC and HCV status: HCV positive with HCC (group 1, n = 81), HCV negative with HCC (group 2, n = 23), HCV positive without HCC (group 3, n = 200), and HCV negative without HCC (group 4, n = 207). Predictive factors of tumor recurrence were demographics, tumor related (size or number of nodules, capsule, bilobar involvement, vascular or lymphatic invasion, clinical and pathologic TNM staging, pre-LT percutaneous ultrasound-guided ethanol injection or transarterial chemoembolization, α-fetoprotein levels), donor and surgery related, and year of transplantation. The same variables and “tumor recurrence (yes/no)” were applied to evaluate the effect on survival. The median follow up was 29 months (range, 0 to 104 months). Patient survival was 70% at 1 year and 59% at 5 years for group 1, 87% at 1 year and 77% at 5 years for group 2, 81% at 1 year and 64% at 5 years for group 3, and 88% at 1 year and 77% at 5 years for group 4 (P = .013). Survival was significantly lower in patients with HCC than in those without (74% and 63% versus 85% and 70%, at 1 and 5 years, respectively; P = .05). The causes of death in those with and without HCC were tumor recurrence (24%) and recurrent HCV (8%) versus sepsis (34%) and recurrent HCV (14%). HCC recurrence occurred in 12 patients (11.5%) at a median of 14 months (range, 3 to 60 months) with a probability increasing from 8% at 1 year to 16% at 5 years. In patients with HCC, tumor recurrence was associated with vascular invasion (P = .0004) by multivariate analysis; variables predictive of survival were donor old age (P = .01), viral-related etiology (P = .02), and tumor recurrence (P = .001). Although LT still remains an adequate indication for HCC in centers with high prevalence of HCV infection and short waiting times, both tumor and HCV-related recurrent diseases hamper significantly the outcomes of these patients. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:1020-1027.)