Prophylactic dosing of factor VIII and factor IX from a clinical pharmacokinetic perspective

Summary.  The high cost and limited availability of factor concentrates make dosing of factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) a crucial issue in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia. It has often been recommended that this treatment should aim to maintain a minimum plasma level of 1% of normal coagulation factor activity (FVIII:C or FIX:C). The dosage needed is commonly given as 25–40 U kg⁻¹ three times weekly for FVIII or twice weekly for FIX. However, these guidelines are valid only with several qualifications. First, the actual trough levels required may vary considerably between patients. The clinical severity of haemophilia may depend on more factors than the endogenous level of FVIII:C or FIX:C. Secondly, interindividual variations in dose requirements are also due to variance in the pharmacokinetics of the coagulation factors. Pharmacokinetic calculations are useful to design optimal dosing schedules to achieve required trough levels of FVIII:C or FIX:C. Moreover, tailoring of the dosing of FVIII or FIX according to their disposition in the individual patient can markedly improve the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic treatment. However, the usefulness of in vivo recovery as a guide for prophylactic dosing seems questionable. It should be clearly understood that maintaining a certain trough level of FVIII:C or FIX:C is not an end in itself. Clinical outcome, not the achieved trough level, determines whether a dosage is adequate. Chiefly for economic reasons, the minimum effective dosage of coagulation factor should be determined and used in every patient. The dose requirement should also be re-evaluated at appropriate times.     

A 6-year follow-up of dosing, coagulation factor levels and bleedings in relation to joint status in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia

Summary. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the possible relationship between coagulation factor level and bleeding frequency during prophylactic treatment of haemophilia after stratification of the patients according to joint scores. The secondary aim was to obtain a systematic overview of the doses of coagulation factors prescribed for prophylaxis at the Malmö haemophilia treatment centre during a 6‐year period. A retrospective survey of medical records for the years 1997–2002 and pharmacokinetic study results from the 1990s was complemented by collection of blood samples for coagulation factor assay when needed. Information on the dosing and plasma levels of factor VIII or factor IX, joint scores and incidence of bleedings (joint bleeds and ‘other bleeds’) was compiled. The patients were stratified by age (0–6, 7–12, 13–18, 19–36 and >36 years) and joint score (0, 1–6 and >6). Individual pharmacokinetic parameters of plasma coagulation factor activities (FVIII:C and FIX:C) were estimated. Trough levels during the treatment were calculated, as well as the number of hours per week of treatment during which plasma FVIII:C/FIX:C fell below a 1, 2 or 3% target level. Fifty‐one patients with haemophilia A (two moderate, 49 severe) and 13 with haemophilia B (all severe) were included, yielding data for 364 patient‐years of treatment. There was a wide range of dosing schedules, the most common ones being three times a week or every other day for FVIII and twice a week or every third day for FIX. The overall relationship between FVIII:C/FIX:C levels and incidence of joint bleeding was very weak, even after stratification of the patients according to joint score. There was no relationship between coagulation factor level and incidence of other bleeds. In this cohort of patients on high‐dose prophylactic treatment, dosing was based more on clinical outcome in terms of bleeding frequency than on the aim to maintain a 1% target level of FVIII:C/FIX:C. Some patients did not bleed in spite of a trough level of <1% and others did in spite of trough levels >3%. The practical implication of our findings is that dosing in prophylactic treatment of haemophilia should be individualized. Thus, proposed standard regimens should be implemented only after careful clinical consideration, with a high readiness for re‐assessment and individual dose tailoring.     

Use of pharmacokinetics in the coagulation factor treatment of patients with haemophilia

Dosing decisions for replacement coagulation factors in patients with haemophilia should be made on an individual patient basis, with the required dose dependent on factors including the clinical situation, the severity of the factor deficiency, and the location and extent of bleeding. Moreover, there is considerable variability in the pharmacokinetics of coagulation products that needs to be considered; in particular, with both factor (F) IX and FVIII products, there is considerable inter-patient variability in in vivo recovery and terminal half-life values. In the present report, we provide a practical guide to calculating and applying pharmacokinetic parameters relevant to the optimal dosing of coagulation products. We discuss the conduct of a pharmacokinetic study in an individual patient, how to calculate pharmacokinetic values from raw data and clinical situations where an individual pharmacokinetic study is helpful. We highlight the importance of considering an individual pharmacokinetic study in all patients starting a new coagulation product.     

Improved cost-effectiveness by pharmacokinetic dosing of factor VIII in prophylactic treatment of haemophilia A

The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of optimizing prophylactic dosing of factor VIII by the use of individual pharmacokinetic data. Twenty-one patients were enrolled in a randomized cross-over study on standard dosage regimens vs. dosing according to pharmacokinetic principles. The study period was 2×6 months. Using single-dose pharmacokinetic data for each patient, plasma factor VIII procoagulant activity (FVIII:C) curves following various doses and intervals were computer-simulated. From these calculations, a suitable dosage was chosen. FVIII:C was also repeatedly measured during study periods. Trough levels of FVIII:C, numbers of spontaneous joint bleedings and amounts of factor concentrate used during the two study periods were compared for each patient.
There was a close correlation between predicted and measured values of FVIII:C. As the half-lives of FVIII:C in the patients varied from 7.8 to 18.3 h, it was obviously beneficial to base the dosage on individual pharmacokinetic data. Fourteen patients completed both study periods. Mean trough level of exogenous FVIII:C was raised from 0.89 (SD 0.73) U dL⁻¹ during standard dosage to 2.2 (1.5) U dL⁻¹ during pharmacokinetic dosage. Concomitantly, mean 6-month consumption of factor VIII was decreased from 124 000 (SD 30 000) units to 84 000 (31 000) units. Numbers of reported bleedings were generally similar during both periods.
The study demonstrates the usefulness of individual pharmacokinetics as a tool for cost-effective utilization of factor VIII in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia A.     

Low-dose intermittent factor replacement for post-operative haemostasis in haemophilia

Recommendations for factor replacement therapy for postoperative haemostasis in haemophilia are often empirical and based on the physiological understanding of haemostatic requirements. This report describes the haemostatic management of patients with severe haemophilia undergoing major surgery using lower than usually recommended levels of factor replacement therapy. Eighteen adults (11 with FVIII and seven with FIX deficiency) with an average weight of 52 kg (range: 27-69) underwent 20 major surgical procedures. Factor concentrates were administered by intermittent bolus infusions. The dose of FVIII infused before surgery was 76 mu kg-1 (range: 51-113) and that of FIX was 77 mu kg-1 (range: 50-104). The preoperative levels achieved were 107% (range: 80-180) and 73% (range: 60-90), respectively. Between days 1 and 3 after surgery, an average of 29 mu kg-1 day-1 (range: 20-46) of FVIII and 23 mu kg-1 day-1 (range: 12-42) of FIX was used resulting in mean trough levels of 36% (range: 12-62) and 34% (range: 11-52), respectively. After day 4, an average of 19 mu kg-1 day-1 (range: 15-25) of FVIII and 18 mu kg-1 day-1 (range: 10-37) of FIX was administered until wound healing. The average duration of factor replacement was 11 days (range: 8-16). The mean dose of factor concentrate per patient was 260 mu kg-1 (range: 179-338) of FVIII and 300 mu kg-1 (range: 183-524) of FIX. The total amount of factor used per patient ranged from 12,380 to 19,980 units of FVIII and 8000 to 23,600 units of FIX. Only one patient had post-operative bleeding which was due to a surgical cause. It is concluded that it may be possible to use much lower than recommended levels of factor replacement therapy for postoperative haemostasis in severe haemophilia.     

Immune tolerance: critical issues of factor dose, purity and treatment complications

Summary.  The current practice of immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy has been largely influenced by the results of small institutional studies and three large registries. However, many questions remain. Successful outcome predictors for ITI in haemophilia A have been suggested by the analyses of two of these registries. Among these predictors, factor VIII (FVIII) dose/dosing regimen remains a controversial outcome parameter, demonstrating a strong direct relationship to ITI success in the international registry and a weaker inverse relationship in the North American registry. There is an international multicentre prospective randomized trial underway to further study the role of FVIII dose in successful ITI induction in a good risk haemophilia A inhibitor patient cohort. FVIII purity also remains an unproved ITI outcome predictor. Institutional experience with von-Willebrand-factor-containing products has suggested its therapeutic advantage in both inhibitor development and eradication. The International ITI Study, although not designed to answer this particular question, may be able to determine an impact on outcome depending on the final distribution of investigator choice of product among the study subjects. Much less is known about the influence of factor IX (FIX) dose and purity on ITI success in haemophilia B. Importantly, nephrotic syndrome has been a major determinant of ITI failure in FIX inhibitor patients, particularly those with the allergic phenotype. Unfortunately, large prospective randomized trials in this group will not be feasible. Rather, we will have to rely on prospectively collected registry data to build our knowledge base of inhibitors and ITI in haemophilia B.     

Advances in the treatment of inherited coagulation disorders

Inherited coagulation disorders constitute a broad spectrum of coagulation factor deficiencies that include X‐linked factor (F)VIII or FIX deficiency that causes haemophilia, and autosomal recessive disorders producing heterogeneous deficiencies in fibrinogen (FI), prothrombin (FII), FV, FVII, FX, FXI, FXIII and combined FV+FVIII. Significant advances in treatments for patients with congenital haemophilia A (FVIII deficiency) and B (FIX deficiency) over the last two decades have resulted from improvements in the production, availability and patient access to factor replacement products. Translation of advances in biotechnology, namely recombinant protein technology, targeted protein modifications to improve function and potentially reduce immunogenicity, and advanced formulations to optimize bioavailability and sustain activity offer promisingly new treatments for haemophilia as well as recessively inherited bleeding disorders in patients who otherwise have few therapeutic options. Though a theoretical risk remains for blood‐borne viral infections with pooled plasma‐derived products, this concern has diminished with breakthroughs in purification and viral inactivation methods. Development of inhibitory antibodies is still the most daunting problem for patients with inherited bleeding disorders, complicating treatment approaches to control and prevent bleeding, and posing risks for allergic and anaphylactic reactions in susceptible patients. The objectives of this review are to (i) highlight emerging advances in hemostatic therapies that are bioengineered to improve pharmacokinetic properties and bioavailability, sustain functional activity, and possibly eliminate immunogenicity of recombinant factor proteins; and (ii) present an overview of key clinical trials of novel factor products currently in the development pipeline.     

Recombinant factor VIIa for patients with inhibitors to factor VIII or IX or factor VII deficiency

Inhibitors to factor VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX) in patients with haemophilia A or B create a challenging problem for the treatment of these patients. Recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa; NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) is a realistic treatment option, owing to its specific mode of action and lack of immunogenicity. This was a multicentre, open-label, compassionate-use trial in patients with severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C < 1%) or B (FIX:C < 1%) with inhibitors, acquired antibodies to FVIII or FIX, or FVII deficiency (FVII:C < 5%), for whom alternative therapies had failed or were contraindicated. Patients received rFVIIa treatment for life- or limb-threatening bleeding episodes or for coverage during essential surgery. The mean rFVIIa dose was approximately 90 microg kg-1 for haemophilia A/B and acquired inhibitor patients, and 25 microg kg-1 for FVII-deficient patients. Efficacy data for 67 treatment episodes (45 bleeding episodes, 22 surgical procedures) are presented; seven patients were treated for a concurrent serious bleeding episode and surgical procedure. At the end of treatment, rFVIIa was effective or partially effective in 85% of serious bleeding episodes. During surgery, bleeding was assessed as none or less than or equivalent to normal in 91% of surgical procedures; postoperatively, 91% of procedures were associated with no or minimal oozing. During 60 separate treatment episodes, 26 adverse events (22 nonserious, four serious) were reported in 15 patients, during 17 bleeding episodes or surgical procedures. Only 10 were considered as having a possible, probable, or unknown relationship with rFVIIa; of these, fever (n=2) and thrombophlebitis (n=3) were the most common. There was no evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation. In conclusion, rFVIIa is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for serious bleeding episodes and bleeding associated with surgical procedures in patients with severe haemophilia A/B with inhibitors, acquired inhibitors, or FVII deficiency.     

Multidose pharmacokinetics of factor IX: implications for dosing in prophylaxis

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of single-dose pharmacokinetic data for factor IX (FIX) to predict multidose pharmacokinetics and explore their use for pharmacokinetic dosing in prophylactic treatment of Haemophilia B. Eight patients with severe Haemophilia B were enrolled. Using single-dose pharmacokinetic data for each patient, plasma factor IX procoagulant activity (FIX:C) curves during prophylactic dosing were computer-simulated. The simulations were verified by repeated blood sampling and measurements of FIX:C. Theoretical dosing regimens to maintain a plasma trough level of 1.0 U dL⁻¹ of FIX:C were calculated. A 2 × 2 week cross-over study on standard dosing according to bodyweight vs. dosing every three days based on individual pharmacokinetics was carried out. FIX:C was measured during each treatment period. FIX:C data from the plasma sampling generally confirmed the single-dose pharmacokinetic data used. Pharmacokinetically tailored dosing of FIX could result in considerable savings of factor concentrate as compared to current standard dosing. The study demonstrates the applicability of individual pharmacokinetics as a tool for cost-effective utilization of FIX concentrates in the prophylactic treatment of Haemophilia B.     

Continuous infusion of intermediate-purity factor VIII in haemophilia A patients undergoing elective surgery

An open, non-randomized trial of continuous infusion therapy was conducted involving five patients with severe haemophilia A who required factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis for elective surgery. This was preceded by a 24-h preoperative pharmacokinetic study to characterize the pharmacokinetic parameters of each individual patient following a bolus dose of the intermediate-purity product. A retrospective matched control group was identified to allow for comparisons of FVIII usage between bolus and continuous infusion administration. A loading dose of FVIII was administered preoperatively, and the continuous infusion was started at the end of surgery and continued for 5 days. The patients' FVIII levels, vital signs, and infusion sites were monitored on a daily basis. The clearance was re-calculated on a daily basis using the FVIII activity of that day to adjust the infusion rate to achieve the desired FVIII level. The mean (CV%) pharmacokinetic parameters estimated preoperatively by noncompartmental analysis were: clearance 3.2 mL kg-1 h-1 (35.5%), volume of distribution 52.1 mL kg-1 (40.2%), mean residence time 17.4 h (23.3%), and half-life 12.7 h (23.6%). A progressive decrease in the clearance of FVIII from a mean of 3.1 mL kg-1 h-1 to 2.0 mL kg-1 h-1 (P = 0.125) over the first 5 days was observed. A therapeutically acceptable level of FVIII was systematically achieved, with the only complication being frequent thrombophlebitis. On average the patients used 19% less FVIII when compared with matched historical controls (P = 0.25). This method was found to be safe and effective in haemophilia A patients undergoing elective surgery procedures.     

Phenotypic characterization of haemophilia B – Understanding the underlying biology of coagulation factor IX

Haemophilia B is a recessive, X‐linked bleeding disorder due to inherited deficiency in vitamin K‐dependent coagulation factor IX (FIX). FIX activity levels, as a basis for the definition of disease severity, do not clearly correlate with bleeding phenotype, likely due to the multiple steps regulating coagulation. Timely, with the availability of extended half‐life products and successful steps in gene therapy, haemophilia B therapy is in an active developmental phase. Therefore, increased knowledge of the factors contributing to the variation of haemostatic and clinical outcome and response to therapy is welcomed. FIX acts at the crossroads of both the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways, and on the platelet procoagulant membrane at the site of vascular injury, and therefore, FIX biology is targeted for multiple effectors and regulators. The synthesis, cellular and molecular interactions, and elimination routes of FIX are not as well studied as for FVIII. The specific roles of magnesium in both platelet adhesion and FIX activation, and of vascular collagen at the haemostatic site of platelet adhesion and FIX residence are of particular interest. Biochemical and translational research on these issues should improve our understanding of the mechanisms involved, leading to the development of relevant assays that measure both haemostasis and treatment response. The latter is becoming increasingly important in the new era of haemophilia management and ultimately may lead to improved treatment strategies individually tailored to a patient's needs and cost‐efficiency.     

Thrombin generation and platelet activation induced by rFVIIa (NovoSeven®) and NN1731 in a reconstituted cell-based model mimicking haemophilia conditions

Summary.  Replacement therapy with factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) is routinely used in haemophilia patients with haemophilia A and B, respectively, while recombinant activated FVII (rFVIIa) has proven to induce haemostasis in haemophilia patients with inhibitors. To evaluate the effect of therapeutic intervention in patients with residual factor activities, the effects of increasing concentrations of rFVIIa or NN1731 on thrombin generation and platelet activation were measured in a cell-based model system mimicking severe, moderate and mild haemophilia A or B. Purified monocytes stimulated to express tissue factor and non-activated platelets from peripheral blood of healthy donors were incubated with a mixture of purified human coagulation factors in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of FVIII or FIX. Sub-samples were analysed for thrombin activity and platelet activation measured as exposure of P-selectin by flow cytometry. Dose-dependent increases in thrombin generation and platelet activation were observed following increasing concentrations of rFVIIa or NN1731 in both haemophilia A- and B-like conditions. At 25 n m rFVIIa, which nears the peak levels in patient plasma after 90 μg kg⁻¹ intravenous dosing, the effects on maximum thrombin generation rate (maxTG) at 1–10% FVIII were comparable to those at 100% and 200% FVIII in the absence of rFVIIa. Normalization of maxTG required 500 n m rFVIIa and 25 n m NN1731 or 25–100 n m rFVIIa and 5 n m NN1731 in severe or moderate/mild haemophilia A and haemophilia B, respectively. This suggests that NN1731 holds its promise as a future bypassing agent for haemophilia patients with and without inhibitors.     

Pharmacokinetics of factor VIII and factor IX

Summary.  A survey of principal pharmacokinetic (PK) studies on factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) plasma- and rDNA-derived concentrates, analysed by means of the PKRD program, has been performed. Notwithstanding the accurate definition of the study design, released in 1991 by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SSC-ISTH), a large variability of PK parameters has been pointed out. In the majority of the PK studies, the size of the population is small. In this situation, a careful individualization of haemophilia therapy is strongly recommended. The tailored prediction of loading and maintenance dosages and the need for strict control of trough FVIII/IX levels are mandatory not only to decrease the risk of bleeds but also to spare financial resources. Recently, the old problem of FVIII assay standardization has again become a concern among physicians, especially after the introduction of B-domain deleted rFVIII concentrate. The discrepancies between the widely used one-stage clotting assay and the chromogenic substrate assay seem to be solved by the introduction of a product-specific laboratory standard.     

In vitro kinetics of factor VIII activity in patients with mild haemophilia A and a discrepancy between one-stage and two-stage factor VIII assay results

In some mild haemophilia A patients (discrepant haemophilia), factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) levels, by one-stage assay are more than double than those by two-stage assay. This may be due to the longer incubation times (10-12 min) in the two-stage assay. This study aimed to determine the time course of the activation phase of the two-stage assay, using both classical coagulation and chromogenic detection methods. In both systems, for equivalent patients (equivalent FVIII:C levels by one-stage and two-stage assays, n = 6, all different mutations), similar FVIII:C results were obtained with short- or long-incubation times. In contrast, plasma from discrepant patients (n = 8, five different mutations) showed higher FVIII:C at shorter incubation times than after longer incubation times. In the chromogenic assay, FVIII:C levels were higher after incubation for 2 min (23-56%, mean 41%) than after 10 min (19-41%, mean 29%). In the classical coagulation assay, FVIII:C levels were higher at shorter incubation times (21-64%, mean 37%) than with the longer incubation times usually used (13-29%, mean 23%). These time-course experiments have verified that the longer incubation time used in the two-stage assay is at least partly responsible for the lower FVIII:C measured by that assay in discrepant haemophilia.     

Genetic risk factors for inhibitors to factors VIII and IX

Summary.  The formation of alloantibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) is the most severe complication of replacement therapy in patients with haemophilia. In the last decade, genetic factors have been shown to constitute a decisive risk determinant for the development of inhibitors. In severe haemophilia A and B, mutations that result in an absent or truncated FVIII/FIX protein are associated with a 20–80% risk of inhibitor formation. In mild to moderate haemophilia, missense mutations represent the main mutation type, with an inhibitor prevalence of 5%. These patients synthesize some endogenous, although non-functional protein that is sufficient to induce immune tolerance. However, in patients with missense mutations clustered in the A2 and C2 domains (C1/C2 junction), the risk of inhibitor formation is fourfold greater than in patients with mutations outside this region, indicating that inhibitor prevalence in missense mutations is also dependent on localization of the mutation. Recently, a significant association between inhibitor formation and polymorphisms in genes coding for cytokines (IL-10) and other immunoregulatory factors (TNF- α ) has been shown. These genetic factors constitute the individual genetic risk profile of a haemophilic patient. This risk is imprinted and fixed; however, environmental factors such as treatment schedule may increase or decrease the inhibitor risk in an individual patient. Improved understanding of these complex interactions may lead to the development of preventive measures to minimize inhibitor formation.     

Presurgical pharmacokinetic analysis of a von Willebrand factor/factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) concentrate in patients with von Willebrand’s disease (VWD) has limited value in dosing for surgery

Summary. Optimal doses of von Willebrand Factor/Factor VIII (VWF/FVIII) concentrates for surgical procedures in patients with VWD need to be determined. A prospective, multicenter study was performed that included an initial pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment following a standard dose of VWF/FVIII concentrate (Humate‐P^®) to determine individual PK parameters and guide therapeutic dosing during surgery. Forty one subjects received 60 IU kg^?1 VWF: RCo. Median plasma levels, half‐life, mean change from baseline and in vivo recovery (IVR) values were determined for VWF:RCo, VWF:Ag, and FVIII: C, and area under the plasma time‐concentration curve (AUC), mean residence time (MRT), clearance, volume of distribution and dose linearity were also assessed for VWF:RCo at various time points. Median baseline VWF:RCo level was 13 IU dL^?1 (range, 6–124); with a mean change from baseline >100 IU dL^?1 immediately after the infusion, decreasing to 10 IU dL^?1 at 48 h postinfusion. The group median incremental in vivo recovery (IVR) for VWF:RCo was 2.4 IU dL^?1 per IU kg^?1, for VWF:Ag 2.3 IU dL^?1 kg^?1 and for FVIII:C was 2.7 IU dL^?1 per IU kg^?1. When analysing individual recovery values on repeated infusions, a very weak correlation was observed between presurgery IVR and IVR for both VWF:RCo and FVIII, measured at various times just prior to and after the surgical procedure. Although group median values were fairly consistent among repeated IVR measurements, the intra‐individual IVR values for FVIII and VWF:RCo with repeated infusions showed a large degree of variability. IVR values obtained from pharmacokinetic analyses performed in advance of anticipated surgery do not reliably predict postinfusion circulating levels of VWF:RCo or FVIII attained preoperatively or with subsequent peri‐operative infusions.     

Laboratory testing for factor VIII and IX inhibitors in haemophilia: A review

Inhibitors are antibodies directed against haemophilia treatment products which interfere with their function. Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in haemophilia A and factor IX (FIX) inhibitors in haemophilia B are significant clinically when they require a change in a patient's treatment regimen. Their persistence may increase morbidity and mortality. Multiple laboratory tests are now available for detecting and understanding inhibitors in haemophilia. Inhibitors are traditionally measured by their interference in clotting or chromogenic factor assays. They may also be detected using immunologic assays, such as enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay or fluorescence immunoassay. Anti‐FVIII or anti‐FIX antibodies of IgG₄ subclass best correlate with the presence of functional inhibitors. Improvements in inhibitor measurement have been recently introduced. Preanalytical heat treatment of patient specimens allows testing of patients without delaying treatment. Use of chromogenic and immunologic assays may aid in identification of false‐positive results, which are frequent among low‐titre inhibitors. Validated reagent substitutions can be used to reduce assay cost. New methods for defining assay positivity and reporting low‐titre inhibitors have been suggested. Challenges remain in the areas of quality control, assay standardization, monitoring of patients undergoing immune tolerance induction therapy and testing in the presence of modified and novel treatment products.     

Evaluation of a novel ELISA screening test for detection of factor VIII inhibitory antibodies in haemophiliacs

Treatment of patients with haemophilia A with coagulation factor concentrates may result in the development of inhibitory antibodies directed against factor VIII (FVIII). In this study, a previously unpublished ELISA test for FVIII inhibitor screening (Genetic Testing Institute [GTI] FVIII inhibitor, Brookfield, WI, USA) was evaluated in 131 blood samples (124 samples from patients with haemophilia A, and seven serial samples from one patient with an acquired FVIII inhibitor). Comparisons were made with the routine screening assay (based on recovery of FVIII) and confirmed where positive (< 90% recovery) with the New Oxford assay. The ELISA kit had a sensitivity of 97.7% and specificity of 78.4%. The high negative predictive value of this new test (98.6%) suggests it may be useful as a reliable, rapid (< 2 h) and flexible (microwell strip format) tool for inhibitor screening of samples from both patients with haemophilia A and those with suspected acquired FVIII inhibitors.     

Kinetics of factor IX activity differ from that of factor IX antigen in patients with haemophilia B receiving high-purity factor IX replacement

Pharmacokinetic studies in haemophilia B have found in vivo recovery of FIX (FIX) to be uniformly lower than the factor VIII recovery in haemophilia A. We hypothesized that this lower recovery could result from rapid binding to high-affinity receptors on platelets and endothelium. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the kinetics of FIX activity and protein in haemophilia B patients. Twelve patients were enrolled in a double dosing, crossover study with two high-purity FIX concentrates, AlphaNine SD and MonoNine. Subjects were given 40 U kg-1 of FIX concentrate and blood samples were taken at 15, 30, and 60 min. A second infusion of 40 U kg-1 was given after the 60 min blood sample and further blood samples removed at 15, 60, 120, and 360 min after the second dose. Patients were infused with the alternate concentrate at least 7 days later. Plasma samples were assayed for FIX activity by coagulation assay and antigen by RIA. FIX antigen in the infused concentrates was measured and quantified as microg U-1. There was no difference between the two FIX concentrates (AlphaNine vs. MonoNine) in the initial (15 min) activity (57% +/-1 19% vs. 53% +/-1 12%) and antigen (62% +/-1 16% vs. 55% +/-1 19%) recoveries. Recoveries after the second FIX dose were not statistically different than those observed after the first FIX dose. In one patient, a doubling of the initial infusion dose did not increase FIX recovery after the second FIX dose. However, the recovery of FIX antigen was significantly greater than the recovery of FIX activity and the differences became more significant in the post-15 min samples. We calculated a ratio of plasma FIX antigen to FIX activity in microg U-1. Average antigen to activity ratio increased from 5.8 +/-1 1.9 microg U-1 at 15 min to 7.1 +/-1 2.2 microg U-1 at 60 min. At 420 min the ratio increased to 9.3 +/-1 2.4 microg U-1. Although these studies failed to demonstrate a significant FIX receptor pool, they did demonstrate a phenomenon of progressive loss of biologic activity of the FIX protein after infusion of FIX concentrates.     

Inherited coagulation disorders in southern Iran

A comprehensive survey concerning the Shiraz Hemophilia Society and the associated haemophilia treatment centre was undertaken in April 2002 to collect data on demographics, signs and symptoms in the southern Iranian population with haemophilia and allied disorders. The total number of patients with coagulation disorders was 367. Haemophilia A (factor [F] VIII deficiency) was found in 271, 39 had haemophilia B (FIX deficiency) and 24 had von Willebrand disease. The rare coagulation disorders (n = 33) included 11 patients with FX deficiency; 10 with FVII; six with FXIII; two with afibrinogenaemia; two with FXI; one with combined FVIII and FV; and one with combined FVII, FVIII and FIX deficiency. The prevalence was 6.64 per 100,000 inhabitants. The most common symptoms were haemarthrosis, haematomas and epistaxis. None of the patients were human immunodeficiency virus positive but 47 (15%) were hepatitis C virus positive and two (0.7%) were hepatitis B positive, so that the rate of transfusion-transmitted infections was lower compared with other populations.