Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain?

STUDY DESIGN: A controlled randomized clinical trial was performed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a light mobilization program on the duration of sick leave for patients with subacute low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Early intervention with information, diagnostics, and light mobilization may be a cost-effective method for returning patients quickly to normal activity. In this experiment, patients were referred to a low back pain clinic and given this simple and systematic program as an outpatient treatment. METHODS: In this study, 457 patients sick-listed 8 to 12 weeks for low back pain, as recorded by the National Insurance Offices, were randomized into two groups: an intervention group (n = 237) and a control group (n = 220). The intervention group was examined at a spine clinic and given information and advice to stay active. The control group was not examined at the clinic, but was treated with conventional primary health care. RESULTS: At 12-month follow-up assessment, 68.4% in the intervention group had returned to full-duty work, as compared with 56.4% in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention with examination, information, and recommendations to stay active showed significant effects in reducing sick leave for patients with low back pain.     

Active treatment programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective,randomized, observer-blinded study

Summary Several new studies have indicated that an active approach to patients with chronic disabling low back pain (LBP) seems effective. Some of these studies emphasize the importance of dealing with the patient's total situation in comprehensive multidisciplinary programs — the bio-psycho-social model. However, these programs are expensive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rehabilitation outcome from three different active programs in terms of: (1) return-to-work rate, (2) days of sick leave, (3) health-care contacts, (4) pain and disability scores, and (5) staying physically active. The subjects included 132 patients randomized to the study, of whom 123 started one of the treatment programs. They had all had at least 6 months of chronic LBP. The patients were randomized into one of three programs: group 1 — a full-time, intensive 3-week multidisciplinary program, including active physical and ergonomic training and psychological pain management, followed by 1 day weekly for the subsequent 3 weeks; group 2 — active physical training, twice a week for 6 weeks, for a total of 24h; group 3 — psychological pain management combined with active physical training, twice a week for 6 weeks, also for a total of 24h. The results presented here are based on data collected 4 months following treatment, which shows an 86% response rate. The initial examination and the follow-up evaluation were performed by a blinded observer. The results show that 4 months after treatment, the intensive multidisciplinary program is superior to the less intensive programs in terms of return-to-work rate, health-care contacts, pain and disability scores, and staying physically active. In conclusion, it seems that although the multidisciplinary program is initially expensive compared to the less intensive programs, the savings in sick pay, early retirement pensions, and health care contacts make it economically worthwhile. Long-term follow-up will show whether this effect continues.     

Functional restoration versus outpatient physical training in chronic low back pain: a randomized comparative study

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized parallel-group comparative trial with a 1-year follow-up period was performed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of a comprehensive functional restoration program involving intensive physical training, ergonomic training, and behavioral support (39 hours per week for 3 weeks) with the effect of outpatient intensive physical training (1.5 hours three times per week for 8 weeks). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Nonrandomized studies conducted in the United States favor functional restoration for patients with chronic low back pain. Two previously reported randomized studies from the authors' Back Center in Copenhagen concur with this recommendation, although the positive effects in one of the studies had faded out after 2 years. Randomized functional restoration studies in Canada and Finland have failed to demonstrate any substantive effect. METHODS: Initially, 138 patients with chronic low back pain were included in the current study. They then were randomized to either functional restoration (n = 64) or outpatient intensive physical training (n = 74). Of the initial 138 patients, 11 never started (5 and 6, respectively); 21 dropped out during treatment (8 and 13); and 7 of the graduates did not take part in the 1-year follow-up evaluation (3 and 4). The conclusions were drawn from the 99 patients (48 and 51, respectively) who graduated and participated in a 1-year follow-up evaluation. The median age of the patients was 42 years (range, 21-55 years) The female-to-male ratio was 68 to 31, and the median sick leave days during the preceding 3 years was 180 (range, 0-1080 days). The average back pain was rated 5.5 on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximal pain). For these variables, there were no important differences between the groups. However, the functional restoration group tended to be more capable of work at baseline (58% vs 42%; P = 0.09). RESULTS: At the 1-year follow-up evaluation, overall assessment favored functional restoration. Otherwise, no significant differences were observed regarding work capability, sick leave for those at work, health care contacts,back pain, leg pain, or self-reported activities of daily living. CONCLUSIONS: Only in terms of overall assessment, the functional restoration program was superior to a comparatively short time-consuming outpatient physical training program. DISCUSSION: It may be that lower economic benefits during sick leave in the United States lead to favorable results from functional restoration programs, whereas greater benefits in Canada, Finland, and Denmark result in different conclusions. Finally, it may be that the difference in results across studies points simply to whether the studies were randomized.     

Short-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein open repair with totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy has emerged as a recognized operative method for inguinal hernia repair. This study compared the short-term results of two tension-free methods of repair: totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic patch repair and the open Lichtenstein mesh technique. METHODS: A total of 1513 men from 11 hospitals who presented with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to one of the two methods. Operating time, short-term complications, reoperations, postoperative pain, consumption of analgesics, sick leave and time to resumption of normal physical activities were recorded. RESULTS: Some 1371 of the 1513 men underwent surgery, 665 in the TEP group and 706 in the Lichtenstein group. The median duration of operation was 55 min for both procedures and 91.0 percent of the patients in both groups were discharged on the day of operation. Patients in the TEP group experienced less postoperative pain (P<0.001), consumed fewer analgesics (P<0.001), had a shorter period of sick leave (7 versus 12 days; P<0.001) and a shorter time to resumption of normal physical activity (20 versus 31 days; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The TEP technique took no longer to perform, and was associated with less postoperative pain, a shorter period of sick leave and a faster recovery, compared with open Lichtenstein hernia repair.     

Conservative treatment in patients sick-listed for acute low-back pain: a prospective randomised study with 12 months’ follow-up

We evaluated three different conservative treatment methods for acute low-back pain patients in groups following a manual therapy programme, an intensive training programme, or a general practitioner programme, the latter serving as the control group. Patients aged 19–64 years on sick leave for low-back pain with or without sciatica were included in a prospective randomised study evaluating outcomes such as impairment, pain, functional disability, socio-economic disability and satisfaction with the treatment or explanations. Evaluation by unbiased observers was performed at 1, 3 and 12 months. The three treatment groups were comparable at baseline. With regard to satisfaction, the patients in the manual therapy programme and those in the intensive training programme were more satisfied with the treatment than those in the general practitioner programme at all follow-ups. With regard to the explanations of current low-back pain episodes, the patients in the manual therapy programme were more satisfied than those in the general practitioner programme at all follow-ups. The manual therapy programme group were also more satisfied with the explanations than those in the intensive training programme at the 1-month follow-up. However, no differences were revealed between the groups with respect to outcomes on measures of impairment, pain, functional disability or socio-economic disability. All three study groups showed rapid improvement. After 1 month a significant improvement was noted in all outcome values compared with the values on entry to the study. Within the limitations discussed in our study, it is concluded that (1) patients sick listed with acute low-back pain, with or without sciatica, will be significantly improved after 1 month regardless of conservative treatment programme; (2) they will be more satisfied with the treatment if they are referred to a manual treatment programme or a training treatment programme; (3) they will be more satisfied with the explanations of the acute low-back problem if they are referred to one of the above groups, especially the manual treatment group; (4) they will not show any other differences with respect to subjective and objective variables, either at short-term or at long-term follow-ups. Received: 6 October 1997 Revised: 10 March 1998 Accepted: 27 April 1998     

Postoperative Pain and Convalescence in Living Kidney Donors—Laparoscopic Versus Open Donor Nephrectomy: A Randomized Study

The aim of the present study was to compare postoperative pain and convalescence in patients randomized to laparoscopic or open donor surgery in a prospective, controlled trial. The donors were randomly assigned to undergo laparoscopic (n = 63) or open (n = 59) donor nephrectomy. Our end points were amount of administered analgesics in the recovery period, postoperative pain on the second postoperative day and at one month after surgery and duration of sick leave. There was a significant difference in favor of the laparoscopic group regarding administered analgesics on day of surgery (p < 0. 02). No difference was observed between groups regarding self-reported pain on the second postoperative day. One month post donation, significantly fewer donors in the laparoscopic group reported pain (p < 0. 02) or had used analgesics (p < 0.05). The duration of sick leave was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.01). The laparoscopic group experienced a more rapid convalescence and a shorter period of sick leave. Although immediate postoperative pain can be managed efficiently regardless of procedure, a lower consumption of opioids and incidence of pain in the convalescent period suggest a clinically relevant patient-experienced benefit from a successful laparoscopic procedure.     

Return-to-work status 1 year after muscle reconditioning in chronic low back pain patients

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate return-to-work status 1 year after a physical deconditioning program in manual laborers with chronic low back pain. METHODS: In this open prospective study, a questionnaire was sent to 125 patients and their physicians (115 men and 10 women, mean age 40 years). Mean sick leave duration at program initiation was 4 months. All participants had followed a physical reconditioning program 12 months earlier. The program for the present study included 6 h of physical and occupational therapy each day, 5 d a week for 3 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred and nine questionnaires were evaluable. Fifty-seven patients (52.3%) were working, 39 (35.8%) full time and 18 (16.5%) part time. The remaining 52 patients were on disability leave. Among the study variables, only a favorable subjective evaluation by the patient at completion of the program and absence of clinical evidence of nonorganic pain at study inclusion significantly predicted return-to-work within 1 year. CONCLUSION: This intensive reconditioning program for low back pain patients had positive effects on return-to-work status after 1 year.     

Active back school: prophylactic management for low back pain. A randomized, controlled, 1-year follow-up study.

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, single-center trial with a stratified group design. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the secondary prophylactic effect of the Active Back School program on minimizing recurrences of low back pain episodes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The results of back school interventions are controversial. Previous work often used short intervention periods and low doses of practical training. However, studies with the highest methodologic scores have shown the best results, especially when conducted in occupational settings and coupled with a comprehensive rehabilitation program. METHODS: By block randomization, 19 men and 24 women were allocated to Active Back School, with 18 men and 20 women as control subjects. The Slumps test and number of low back pain episodes during the previous 36 months were used as stratification factors. There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to demographic factors and initially observed variables. Active Back School consisted of 20 lessons over a 13-week period. Each lesson was divided into a 20-minute theoretical part and a 40-minute exercise part. All participants were examined on enrollment, then 5 and 12 months after initiation of the program. Outcome measures were recurrence of low back pain episodes and number of days of sick leave. RESULTS: The recurrence of new low back pain episodes was significantly lower (P < 0.05) and the time from inclusion to the first new episode significantly longer (P < 0.01) in the Active Back School group than in the control group. In the Active Back School group, seven participants took sick leave because of low back pain episodes during the first 12 months of follow-up compared with 11 among the control subjects. The number of sick leave days was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the Active Back School group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Active Back School reduced the recurrence and severity of new low back pain episodes according to results of follow-up examinations performed 5 and 12 months after enrollment.     

Predictors of outcome in fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study

Despite the continuous development of surgical techniques and implants, a substantial number of patients still undergo surgery for chronic low back pain (CLBP) without any benefit, or even become worse. With the aim of finding predictors of functional and work status outcome, 264 patients with severe CLBP of long duration, randomised to surgical or non-surgical treatment, were characterized by socio-demographic, clinical, radiological and psychological variables. The variables were estimated as predictors of outcome at the 2-year follow-up. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used in both treatment groups. We found that a personality characterized by low neuroticism and low disc height were significant predictors of functional improvement after surgical treatment. Depressive symptoms predicted functional improvement after non-surgical treatment. Work resumption was predicted by low age and short sick leave in the surgical group, and by short sick leave in the non-surgical group. We conclude that improved selection of successful surgical candidates with CLBP seems to be promoted by attention to severe disc degeneration, evaluation of personality traits and shortening of preoperative sick leave.     

Recurrent inguinal hernia: randomized multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair

Background The optimal treatment for recurrent inguinal hernia is of concern due to the high frequency of recurrence. Methods This randomized multicenter study compared the short- and long-term results for recurrent inguinal hernia repair by either the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch (TAPP) procedure or the Lichtenstein technique. Results A total of 147 patients underwent surgery (73 TAPP and 74 Lichtenstein). The operating time was 65 min (range, 23–165 min) for the TAPP group and 64 min (range, 25–135 min) for the Lichtenstein group. Patients who underwent TAPP reported significantly less postoperative pain and shorter sick leave (8 vs 16 days). The recurrence rate 5 years after surgery was 19% for the TAPP group and 18% for the Lichtenstein group. Conclusion The short-term advantage for patients who undergo the laparoscopic technique is less postoperative pain and shorter sick leave. In the long term, no differences were observed in the chronic pain or recurrence rate.     

Intensive group training protocol versus guideline physiotherapy for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial

Intensive group training using principles of graded activity has been proven to be effective in occupational care for workers with chronic low back pain. Objective of the study was to compare the effects of an intensive group training protocol aimed at returning to normal daily activities and guideline physiotherapy for primary care patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. The study was designed as pragmatic randomised controlled trial with a setup of 105 primary care physiotherapists in 49 practices and 114 patients with non-specific low back pain of more than 12 weeks duration participated in the study. In the intensive group training protocol exercise therapy, back school and operant-conditioning behavioural principles are combined. Patients were treated during 10 individual sessions along 20 group sessions. Usual care consisted of physiotherapy according to the Dutch guidelines for Low Back Pain. Main outcome measures were functional disability (Roland Morris disability questionnaire), pain intensity, perceived recovery and sick leave because of low back pain assessed at baseline and after 6, 13, 26 and 52 weeks. Both an intention-to-treat analysis and a per-protocol analysis were performed. Multilevel analysis did not show significant differences between both treatment groups on any outcome measures during the complete follow-up period, with one exception. After 26 weeks the protocol group showed more reduction in pain intensity than the guideline group, but this difference was absent after 52 weeks. We finally conclude that an intensive group training protocol was not more effective than usual physiotherapy for chronic low back pain.     

Home access to hospital discharge information on audiotape reduces sick leave and readmissions in patients with first-time myocardial infarction

A prospective, randomized study was carried out to investigate whether repeated hospital discharge information on audiotape at home could improve knowledge and rehabilitation in patients with first-time myocardial infarction. The study comprised 50 patients (12 females and 38 males) of up to 75 years of age. At discharge, 26 patients were given tape recordings to use at home for one week, while 24 patients represented controls. High scores in patients' knowledge about their own disease were noted, as well as differences in long-term sick leave between the two groups and readmissions or need for emergency visits. No difference in knowledge was observed, but fewer patients in the tape group had long-term sick leave, readmissions or need for emergency visits. We found that baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. Since acquired knowledge did not appear to differ between the groups, an effect of the taped information on the patients' family network is considered.     

Évaluation de l’efficacité à 1 an d’un programme de reconditionnement à l’effort dans la lombalgie chronique

Objective. – To evaluate return-to-work status 1 year after a physical reconditioning program in manual laborers with chronic low back pain.Methods. – In this open prospective study, a questionnaire was sent to 125 patients and their physicians (115 men and 10 women, mean age 40 years). Mean sick leave duration at program initiation was 4 months. All participants had followed a physical reconditioning program 12 months earlier. The program for the present study included 6 h of physical and occupational therapy each day, 5 days a week for 3 weeks.Results. – One hundred and nine questionnaires were evaluable. Fifty-seven patients (52.3%) were working, 39 (35.8%) full time and 18 (16.5%) part time. The remaining 52 patients were on disability leave. Among the study variables, only a favorable subjective evaluation by the patient at completion of the program and absence of clinical evidence of nonorganic pain at study inclusion significantly predicted return to work within 1 year.Conclusion. – This intensive reconditioning program for low back pain patients had positive effects on return-to-work status after 1 year.     

Morbidity and short term results in a randomised trial of open compared with closed treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the morbidity and short term results after open compared with closed treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus. DESIGN--Randomised control trial. SUBJECTS--120 of 164 patients with chronic pilonidal sinus treated between April 1987 and April 1989. INTERVENTIONS--60 patients were treated by excision and primary suture, and 60 by excision and open packing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Incidence of early complications (bleeding that needed treatment, wound breakdown, infection, haematoma, or wound pain), number of postoperative visits required, and length of sick leave taken. RESULTS--Those patients who underwent excision and suture had slightly but not significantly fewer early complications (16/60, 27%, compared with 23/60, 38%). Most of the early complications were the result of infection (8, 13% compared with 18, 30%, respectively). They also required fewer followup visits and less sick leave, and their wounds healed more quickly. At one year the numbers of late complications were 19 (32%) and 14 (23%), respectively. CONCLUSION--Excision and primary closure of chronic pilonidal sinus causes less morbidity and is more cost effective than excision and open packing. We plan a three year follow-up to see if these results are maintained.     

Multidisciplinary orthopedic rehabilitation program in patients with chronic back pain and need for changing job situation -- long-term effects of a multimodal, multidisciplinary program with activation and job development

BACKGROUND: According to a recent review by Hüppe and Raspe effects of multidisciplinary treatment programs for patients with chronic low back pain in Germany seem to be rather weak and not to have persisting effects. Factors which could counteract possible benefits of treatment are, among others, psychic and job-related stresses and strains persisting after treatment. A multidisciplinary, in-patient treatment program for patients with chronic low back pain, therefore, was amended by multidisciplinary diagnosis and assignment and measures to support vocational solutions. METHOD: To evaluate the effects of the multidisciplinary program in comparison to a control group with the usual care, a prospective longitudinal study was conducted. 307 patients were assigned to the multidisciplinary in-patient treatment program, whereas 176 patients with comparable complaints had the standard rehabilitation program. Besides the full sample, we analyzed a subgroup of patients with chronic low back pain. RESULTS: We found positive moderate and strong effects in the intervention group concerning function, pain, psychic strains as well as the number of sick days and return to work rates 10 months after discharge. Effects in the intervention group exceeded the effects achieved in the control group. Beside the full sample, we analyzed a subgroup of patients with chronic low back pain, who received an intense activating group treatment. Also in this subgroup we found moderate and strong effects of treatment superior to those in the control group for function, psychic strains and sick days. CONCLUSION: We attribute these persisting and superior effects in the treatment group to an efficient treatment of occupational and psychic problems as well as to more homogeneous treatment groups attained by a multidisciplinary diagnosis and team-based assignment. They also show the significance of in-patient-treatment which is effective, when -- based on multidisciplinary diagnosis -- differential treatment groups can be formed.     

Comparison of a biopsychosocial therapy (BT) with a conventional biomedical therapy (MT) of subacute low back pain in the first episode of sick leave: a randomized controlled trial

This randomized controlled clinical trial compares the effectiveness of a biopsychosocial treatment with a solely conventional biomedical therapy in patients with subacute low back pain using parameters for pain intensity, functional status, depressive dysfunction and work performance. Sixty-four patients with a first-time sick leave between 3 and 12 weeks due to low back pain were randomly assigned to either a conventional biomedical therapy (MT; n=33) group, or a biopsychosocial therapy (BT; n=31) group including a psychotherapeutic module; both in accordance with a standardized 3 weeks inpatient treatment. Pain intensity, functional back capacity, clinical parameters and depressive dysfunction revealed significant improvement in both treatment groups at end of 3 weeks therapy (T1). However, at 6 months (T2), analysis revealed significant better results for nearly all parameters in the BT group that showed further improvement from T1 to T2, whereas the values in the MT group deteriorated from T1 back to the baseline values. During the 2-year period after therapy, 10% in MT and 59% in BT required no further sick leave due to low back pain. The results of the study indicate that a psychotherapeutic element in the treatment of low back pain appears to positively influence pain, functional status and work performance when conducted at an early stage of chronification and helps in the achievement of a better outcome.     

Postoperative convalescence after inguinal hernia surgery: Prospective randomized multicenter study of laparoscopic versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1042 patients

Interest in inguinal hernia surgery has increased significantly with the introduction of new operating techniques during the past decade. This multicenter study compared short-term results in patients treated by the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch technique (TAPP; n=518) and the Shouldice technique (n=524). We evaluated demographics, operative data, complications, hospital stay, postoperative pain, use of analgesics, functional status, sick leave, and complaints up to 3 months postoperatively. The median operating time was shorter in the Shouldice group (55 vs. 65 min), but there were no significant differences in complication rates, and major complications were rare. The hospital stay was 1 day or less in over 98% of cases in both groups, but more operations were performed on outpatient basis in the Shouldice group. In the TAPP group postoperative pain and analgesic consumption were less, postoperative functional status was better, and sick leave was shorter (10 vs. 14 days). These results show that the two methods are equally safe and have few major complications. The TAPP operation is associated with less postoperative pain, better postoperative functional status, and shorter sick leave, but at the price of a longer operating time. Electronic Publication     

Sustainability of return to work in sick-listed employees with low-back pain. Two-year follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Sick-listed employees with low back pain had similar return to work (RTW) rates at one-year follow-up in a randomized trial comparing two interventions, but the effects were modified by specific workplace related factors. The present study addressed the sustainability of the intervention effects by performing a two-year follow-up and by using different outcome measures. METHODS: A total of 351 employees sick-listed for 3--16 weeks due to LBP were recruited from their general practitioners and were randomly allocated to a hospital-based brief or multidisciplinary intervention. Outcome measures were based on sick leave registered in a national database of social and health-related benefits. RTW rates, RTW status, sick leave weeks and sick leave relapse were studied. RESULTS: During the two-year follow-up 80.0% and 77.3% had RTW for at least four weeks continuously, and the percentages with RTW at the 104th week were 61.1% and 58.0% in the brief and multidisciplinary intervention groups, respectively. At the 104th week 16.6% and 18.8% were on sick leave in the two groups, respectively, and about 12% were employed in modified jobs or participated in job training. The number of weeks on sick leave in the first year was significantly lower in the brief intervention group (median 14 weeks) than in the multidisciplinary intervention group (median 20 weeks), but during the second year the number of weeks on sick leave were not significantly different between intervention groups. Subgroups characterised by specific work related factors modified the effect of the intervention groups on RTW rates (p = 0.017). No difference in sick leave relapse was found between the intervention groups. CONCLUSION: The effects of the brief and multidisciplinary interventions at the two-year follow-up were in general similar to the effects at one-year follow-up.Trial RegistrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN18609003.     

Comparison of usual surgical advice versus a nonaggravating six-month gym-based exercise rehabilitation program post-lumbar discectomy: results at one-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Discectomy is the surgery of choice for the lumbosacral radicular syndrome. Previous studies on the postsurgical management of these cases compare one exercise regime to another. This study compares an exercise-based group with a control group involving no formal exercise or rehabilitation. PURPOSE: The outcomes of a formal postsurgical exercise-based rehabilitation when compared with the usual rehabilitative surgical advice were evaluated. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized clinical trial comparing management regimes after lumbar discectomies. PATIENT SAMPLE: Ninety-three lumbar discectomy patients were randomized to two groups. OUTCOME MEASURES: The following postoperative outcomes were used: levels of pain; levels of function; psychological well-being; time off work; levels of medication; and number of doctor/therapist visits. METHODS: Ninety-three lumbar discectomy patients were randomized to two groups. The treatment group undertook a 6-month supervised nonaggravating exercise program. The control group followed the usual surgical advice to resume normal activities as soon as the pain allowed. Both groups were followed for 1 year by using validated outcome measures. RESULTS: The results are based on an intention-to-treat analysis. Patients in both groups improved during the 1-year follow-up (p=.001). There was no statistical significance between the groups at the clinical endpoint. The treatment group returned to work 7 days earlier and had fewer days off work in the 1-year follow-up period. CONCLUSION: There was no statistical advantage gained by the group that performed the 6-month supervised nonaggravating exercise program at 1-year follow-up. They did, however, have fewer days off work.     

Clinical factors of importance for outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery: long-term follow-up

Factors as age, sex, smoking, duration of leg pain, working status, type/level of disc herniation and psychosocial factors have been demonstrated to be of importance for short-term results after lumbar discectomy. There are few studies with long-term follow-up. In this prospective study of lumbar disc herniation patients undergoing surgery, the result was evaluated at 2 and 5–10 (mean 7.3) years after surgery. Predictive factors for satisfaction with treatment and objective outcome were investigated. Out of the included 171 patients undergoing lumbar discectomy, 154 (90%) patients completed the 2-year follow-up and 140 (81%) completed the long-term follow-up. Baseline data and questionnaires about leg- and back pain intensity (VAS), duration of leg pain, disability (Oswestry Disability Index), depression (Zung Depression Scale), sick leave and employment status were obtained preoperatively, at 2-year- and long-term follow-up. Primary outcome included patient satisfaction with treatment (at both time points) and assessment of an independent observer at the 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes at 2-year follow-up were improvement of leg and back pain, working capacity and the need for analgesics or sleeping pills. In about 70% of the patients excellent or good overall result was reported at both follow-ups, with subjective outcome measurements. The objective evaluation after 2 years was in agreement with this result. Time on sick leave was found to be a clinically important predictor of the primary outcomes, with a potential of changing the probability of a satisfactory outcome (both objective and subjective) from around 50% (sick leave >3 months) to 80% (sick leave <2 months). Time on sick leave was also an important predictor for several of the secondary outcomes; e.g. working capacity and the need for analgesics.