Dose-area product readings for fluoroscopic and plain film examinations, including an analysis of the source of variation for barium enema examinations

This paper contains the results of an investigation undertaken between 1994 and 1996 using dose-area product (DAP) meters for monitoring radiation doses from six types of simple examinations and seven types of complex examinations. Mean hospital DAP levels have been compared with National Reference Levels (NRL), with most departments producing levels lower than NRLs. DAP readings have allowed the proposal of provisional Reference Levels (RL) to be set for simple and complex examinations. The results were also compared with recently published data from the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB), highlighting those hospitals which need to make changes in radiographic technique. The study of DAP reference doses also confirms that dose levels for complex investigations are clearly related to technique, in terms of screening time and number of films. Although the use of increased screening tube kilovoltage may be relevant, the overall effect is small. The results suggest that there is still a need to optimize the protocols for these examinations. The use of digital equipment has been shown to have a complex effect on dose, particularly in the case of investigations involving both films and fluoroscopy.     

Patient Radiation Dose in Diagnostic and Interventional Procedures for Intracranial Aneurysms: Experience at a Single Center

Objective

To assess patient radiation doses during cerebral angiography and embolization of intracranial aneurysms in a large sample size from a single center.

Materials and Methods

We studied a sample of 439 diagnostic and 149 therapeutic procedures for intracranial aneurysms in 480 patients (331 females, 149 males; median age, 57 years; range, 21-88 years), which were performed in 2012 with a biplane unit. Parameters including fluoroscopic time, dose-area product (DAP), and total angiographic image frames were obtained and analyzed.

Results

Mean fluoroscopic time, total mean DAP, and total image frames were 12.6 minutes, 136.6 ± 44.8 Gy-cm², and 251 ± 49 frames for diagnostic procedures, 52.9 minutes, 226.0 ± 129.2 Gy-cm², and 241 frames for therapeutic procedures, and 52.2 minutes, 334.5 ± 184.6 Gy-cm², and 408 frames for when both procedures were performed during the same session. The third quartiles for diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) were 14.0, 61.1, and 66.1 minutes for fluoroscopy time, 154.2, 272.8, and 393.8 Gy-cm² for DAP, and 272, 276, and 535 for numbers of image frames in diagnostic, therapeutic, and both procedures in the same session, respectively. The proportions of fluoroscopy in DAP for the procedures were 11.4%, 50.5%, and 36.1%, respectively, for the three groups. The mean DAP for each 3-dimensional rotational angiographic acquisition was 19.2 ± 3.2 Gy-cm². On average, rotational angiography was used 1.4 ± 0.6 times/session (range, 1-4; n = 580).

Conclusion

Radiation dose in our study as measured by DAP, fluoroscopy time and image frames did not differ significantly from other reported DRL studies for cerebral angiography, and DAP was lower with fewer angiographic image frames for embolization. A national registry of radiation-dose data is a necessary next step to refine the dose reference level.     

Radiation Exposure in Vascular Angiographic Procedures

PurposeTo evaluate dose reduction in vascular angiographic procedures by using fluoroscopy capture instead of digital subtraction angiography frames for documentation.Materials and MethodsA total of 764 consecutive vascular interventional procedures performed over a period of 1 year were retrospectively analyzed with respect to the fluoroscopy time and the resulting dose–area product (DAP), the DAP of the radiographic frames, and the overall DAP.ResultsA total of 70% of the total DAP was a result of the acquisition of radiographic frames, leaving only 30% being applied by fluoroscopy.ConclusionsFluoroscopy capture should be used for documentation whenever possible. A registry of radiation exposure should not only comprise a sufficiently large number of interventions but also different intervention types to allow the development of interventional reference levels.     

Dose and image quality in the comparison of analogue and digital techniques in paediatric urology examinations

In paediatric radiology it has been recognised that children have a higher risk of developing cancer from the irradiation than adults (two to three times); therefore, increased attention has been directed towards the dose to the patient. In this study the effect on patient dose and image quality in replacing the exposure in micturating cystourethrography (MCUG) examinations with the stored fluoroscopy image has been investigated. In the intravenous urography (IVU) examination we compared analogue and digital image quality, but the dose measurements were performed on a phantom. Standard clinical X-ray equipment was used. Sixty-eight patients in each of two centres were studied for the MCUG. Doses were measured with a dose-area product (DAP) meter and the image quality was scored. A non-parametric statistical analysis was performed. For the IVU, a phantom was used in the dose measurements but clinical images were scored in the comparison between analogue and digital images. For the MCUG, replacing the exposure with stored fluoroscopy images lowered the DAP value from 0.77 to 0.50 Gy cm². The image quality did not show any difference between the techniques; however, if reflux was to be graded, exposure was needed. For the IVU, the doses could be lowered by a factor of 3 using digital techniques. The image quality showed no statistical difference between the two techniques. There is a potential for a substantial dose reduction in both MUCG and IVU examinations using digital techniques.     

Evaluation of patient-absorbed doses during coronary angiography and intervention by femoral and radial artery access

The aim of this study was to compare the radiation dose to patients during coronary angiography (CA) and coronary intervention (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, PTCA) by the femoral or radial artery access routes. A plane-parallel ionisation chamber, mounted on an under-couch X-ray tube (Siemens Coroskop TOP with an optional dose reduction system), recorded the dose-area product (DAP) to the patient from 40 coronary angiographies and 42 coronary interventions by the femoral route. The corresponding numbers for radial access were 36 and 24, respectively. Using a human-shaped phantom, conversion factors between maximum entrance surface dose and DAP were derived for CA and CA plus PTCA, respectively. The dose to the staff was measured with TL dosimeters for 22 examinations. Fluoroscopy time and DAP were significantly (p=0.003) larger using the radial access route for coronary angiography (7.5 min, 51 Gy cm²) than the corresponding values obtained from femoral access route (4.6 min, 38 Gy cm²). For CA plus PTCA the fluoroscopy time and DAP were larger for radial access (18.4 min, 75 Gy cm²) than for femoral access (12.5 min, 47 Gy cm²; p=0.013). In our experience, radial access did significantly prolong the fluoroscopy time and increase the patient doses.     

Investigation into patient doses for intravenous urography and proposed Irish diagnostic reference levels

With the introduction of Council Directive 97/43/Euratom, all member states should establish relevant diagnostic reference levels for X-ray examinations. Diagnostic reference levels help to facilitate standardisation and optimisation within departments and attempt to reduce dose variations between hospitals. High variation of individual patient doses for plain-film examinations by up to a factor of 75 was demonstrated by a previous Irish study, which highlighted the necessity for further investigation into other examinations in Ireland. The current work aimed to establish reference values for intravenous urography (IVU) examinations, an important contributor to collective dose. Eleven Irish hospitals were randomly selected, representing 30% of the total number of hospitals. Dose-area product (DAP) readings for IVUs were recorded along with technical and procedural details. Resultant data demonstrated mean hospital and individual patient DAP variations of a factor of 4 and 58, respectively. Stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that number of images taken, method of image acquisition and patient weight were the main causal agents for dose variations recorded. A proposed diagnostic reference level of 12 Gy cm² was established at the level of the third-quartile value of the mean hospital DAP values. This article provides evidence of large variations in DAP values for IVU examinations. It is hoped that application of the proposed DRL of 12 Gy cm² will reduce the size of these variations.     

Comparing the performance of mono- and biplane fluoroscopy systems in diagnostic and interventional neuroangiography using the dose-area product

Biplane digital imaging systems are favoured in neurointerventional practice since they are believed to contribute to safer, quicker and more efficacious procedures. Our aim was to establish if such equipment exposes patients to the same level of ionising radiation as monoplane systems. We reviewed monoplane and biplane fluoroscopy screening times and dose-area products (DAP) for 267 diagnostic cerebral angiograms and 56 neurointerventional cases. Significantly lower DAP for the latter were recorded on the biplane equipment, demonstrating an important reduction in patient exposure to radiation. There were no significant differences between the two systems for diagnostic cerebral angiography. Received: 11 October 2000/Accepted: 19 October 2000     

Patient radiation doses and references levels in interventional radiology

PURPOSE: To set Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) in interventional radiology by means of dose area product (DAP) measurements and the grouping of homogeneous procedures, and to quantify the associated errors in the DRL estimates. To evaluate the Mean Effective Doses per single procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Interventional radiology procedures were divided into four main groups: neuroradiological, vascular, extravascular and paediatric. Neuroradiological and vascular procedures were further divided into diagnostic and interventional procedures. Starting from DAP and total fluoroscopy time measurements in 1,256 patients, the DRLs were determined for 17 procedures, together with an estimate of their uncertainty. The correlation between fluoroscopy time and DAP was assessed. Mean effective dose estimates were obtained from measured DAP values and from the analysis of the dosimetric data reported in the literature for similar procedures. RESULTS: The main features of DAP distributions are long high-dose tails, indicating asymmetric distributions, together with a large interquartile range. Rounded third-quartile values of DAP distributions showed a large range in the procedures taken into consideration. Values of 147, 198, 338 Gy cm(2)were obtained for supra-aortic angiography, cerebral angiography and embolization. Values of 86-101 and 459-438 Gy cm(2)were obtained for diagnostic and interventional vascular procedures on the lower limbs and on the abdomen, respectively. Values of 25-33 Gy cm(2)were obtained for retrograde cystourethrographies and ERCP, and values of 62-158 Gy cm(2)were obtained for nephrostomy and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. The correlation between total fluoroscopy time and the DAP values was poor. Mean effective dose estimates showed lower values for extravascular procedures (4.8-28.2 mSv), intermediate values for neuroradiological procedures (12.6-32.9 mSv) and higher values for vascular procedures involving the abdomen (36.5-86.8 mSv). DISCUSSION: DAP values were generally higher in vascular than in extravascular procedures. In generally, interventional vascular procedures show higher DAP values than the corresponding diagnostic procedures, with the exception of the abdominal region where the values were similar. Extravascular procedures with percutaneous access show significantly higher DAP values than those with endoscopic access. Total fluoroscopy time is a poor predictor of patient doses in interventional radiology. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic recording of DAP values, together with adequate grouping of similar procedures makes it possible to establish stable DRLs on a local basis and to carry out dosimetric evaluations, although on a statistical rather than individual basis. Patient radiation doses during interventional radiological procedures may be high, particularly when the abdominal region is involved.     

Patient and occupational dosimetry in double contrast barium enema examinations

A new and relatively simple method is presented to distribute total dose-area product (DAP) over a number of projections that model exposure during double contrast barium enema (DCBE) examinations. In addition, hitherto unavailable entrance and effective doses to the physician performing the DCBE examination have been determined. DAP, fluoroscopy time, number of images as well as some patient data were collected for 150 DCBE examinations. For a subset of 50 examinations, the distribution of DAP over 12 hypothetical but representative projections was estimated by measuring the entrance dose in the centre of each of these projections during the complete procedure. Effective dose to the patient was obtained using DAP to effective dose conversion coefficients calculated for each of the 12 projections. Exposure of the worker was quantified by measuring the entrance dose at the forehead, neck, arms, right hand and legs. The sex-averaged effective dose to the patient per examination was 6.4+/-2.1 mSv (mean+/-SD; n=50) and the corresponding DAP was 44+/-22 Gy cm(2). The effective dose to the worker per examination was 0.52 microGy (n=50), whereas the highest entrance dose of 30+/-25 microGy was found for the right arm. The proposed method for deriving the distribution of total DAP over a set of representative projections is much less time consuming than visual observation of patient exposure, whilst accuracy seems acceptable. Entrance and effective doses per examination for workers in DCBE examinations are very low. For a normal workload, doses remain far below the legally established dose limits.     

Comparison of a conventional and a flat-panel digital system in interventional cardiology procedures

The purpose of the study was to analyse the technical characteristics of a newly installed flat-panel fluoroscopy (FPF) system in an interventional cardiology (IC) department and compare it with an older conventional system. A patient survey was performed to investigate the radiation doses delivered by the X-ray systems. Finally, methods of technique optimization regarding the new digital system were investigated. Dose rates in all fluoroscopic and cine modes were measured and image quality assessed using a dedicated test tool. 200 patients were investigated, half using the conventional and half using the digital FPF system. Patient data collected were: sex, age, weight, height, dose-area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time (T) and total number of frames (F). Our results are: (1) Digital FPF system: high contrast resolution (HCR) is not affected by fluoroscopic mode, whereas low contrast resolution (LCR) is slightly decreased in the low mode. (2) The digital FPF system has 2.5 times better HCR than the conventional system, with 5 times lower dose in the fluoroscopy mode. (3) Median values of DAP, T and F, respectively, in coronary angiography (CA) are: 27.7 Gycm(2), 4.1 min and 876 for the digital and 39.3 Gycm(2), 5.3 min and 1600 for the conventional system. Median values for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) are: 51.1 Gycm(2), 12.7 min and 1184 for the digital and 44.3 Gycm(2), 7.4 min and 1936 for the conventional system. Digital DAP in CA is reduced by 30%, suggesting that a dose reduction in the FPF system is possible. The results of the study concerning the FPF system lead to the conclusion that the lowest fluoroscopic mode and the lowest frame rate should be used in routine practice.     

Preliminary reference levels in interventional cardiology

This article describes the European DIMOND approach to defining reference levels (RLs) for radiation doses delivered to patients during two types of invasive cardiology procedures, namely coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Representative centres of six European countries recorded patients' doses in terms of dose-area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time and number of radiographic exposures, using X-ray equipment that has been subject to constancy testing. In addition, a DAP trigger level for cardiac procedures which should alert the operator to possible skin injury, was set to 300 Gy×cm². The estimation of maximum skin dose was recommended in the event that a DAP trigger level was likely to be exceeded. The proposed RLs for CA and PTCA were for DAP 45 Gy×cm² and 75 Gy×cm², for fluoroscopy time 7.5 min and 17 min and for number of frames 1250 and 1300, respectively. The proposed RLs should be considered as a first approach to help in the optimisation of these procedures. More studies are required to establish certain "tolerances" from the proposed levels taking into account the complexity of the procedure and the patient's size.     

心血管介入手术中透视时间作为辐射剂量警示指标的可行性研究

目的以心血管介入术后采集空气比释动能(reference air kerma,AK)值和剂量面积乘积(dose-area product,DAP)值数据为依据,分析术中透视时间报警设置作为心血管介入手术辐射剂量的监测和警示工具的可行性。方法回顾性分析2016年11月至2018年1月上海长海医院736例冠状动脉造影术(CAG)和经皮冠状动脉治疗术(PCI)病例,收集术中透视时间、AK和DAP数据资料。德国西门子成像设备分组(Ceiling系统和Biplane系统)和手术类型分组(CAG和PCI),对辐射剂量数据进行比较,以及对心血管介入手术AK和DAP值与透视时间数据采用Spearman检验解析相关性。结果Ceiling和Biplane成像系统中手术透视时间为(8.9±7.8)和(8.6±7.3)min,透视AK均值和DAP均值分别为(472±474)、(510±509)mGy、(4548±4085)和(4255±3781)μGy·m^2,术中总(透视+造影)AK和DAP均值为(703±595)、(733±614)mGy、(6253±4938)和(5681±4432)μGy·m^2。CAG与PCI术中透视时间均值分别为(2.4±0.9)和(15.7±4.9)min。PCI透视辐射剂量(AK和DAP)与术中总辐射剂量比值分别为74%和78%。心血管介入手术中透视时间与AK值(r=0.822)和DAP值(r=0.844)都呈高度相关性(P<0.001)。结论透视采集辐射剂量是心血管介入手术中辐射剂量的主要来源,辐射剂量随透视时间延长而增加,透视时间监测和报警设置在心血管介入临床应用中作为术中辐射防护工具有一定的参考和警示价值。     

Method of patient dose evaluation in the angiographic and interventional radiology procedures

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effective dose in interventional radiology and angiography procedures on the basis of the dose-area product (DAP), either measured or calculated using two different methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 2072 examinations carried out on several X-ray systems both in angiography and in interventional radiology. Some of the systems were equipped with an on-board transmission chamber for DAP measurements; for these systems we took direct DAP measurements for each type of examination. For the systems without the dose measurement device, we used a portable transmission chamber, acquiring the data from a set of sampling frames. We then derived the dose values from the systems' dosimetry data and the information about each examination. To this end, the dosimetry of each x-ray system was done by measuring tube output in the different acquisition modes, backscatter factor and field-homogeneity factor. Survey data sheets were filled in after every examination indicating the exposure data (mean Kv, mAs, focus-skin distance and field size). These values combined with the dosimetric data were used to evaluate the DAP for each exam. Where possible, we compared the measured and calculated DAP values by assessing the percentage deviation between each pair of values. A similar comparison was made for the single examinations using a simplified calculation algorithm reported in the literature. For all the examinations for which we had adequate survey data sheets, we estimated the DAP and the entrance dose values and, with the aid of WinODS software, the effective dose. RESULTS: The direct measurements of DAP showed that, in interventional radiology and angiographic procedures, the variability in examination conditions leads to a wide range of possible patient doses even within the same examination type.The comparison between the measured and calculated DAP using our algorithm showed substantial agreement (mean difference 30%, maximum 80%). By contrast, using the algorithm proposed in the literature, we obtained deviations higher than 100%.An estimate of the effective dose for all the recorded examinations (2072) permitted evaluation of both magnitude and variability of patient doses in special radiology procedures such as angiography and interventional radiology. However, it should be noted that evaluations based on calculated DAP values may be as uncertain as those estimated for DAP, and that clearly the evaluations made for the examinations for which direct measurements are available are more accurate.In particularly 'invasive' examinations in terms of entrance dose, where the threshold limits for deterministic effects might possibly be exceeded, the equivalent doses to critical organs were also assessed. This analysis showed that in a small percentage of patients (5%) 2 Gy to the skin was exceeded in the areas exposed with possible transient erythema, while in fewer than 2% of patients, the 3 Gy limit for temporary epilation was exceeded. CONCLUSIONS: Many interventional radiology, especially haemodynamic, examinations have shown to give significant exposure to patients. The direct dose measurement method has shown to be the only method able to provide reliable information on such exposure.However, the authors believe that since the patient dose cannot be established in advance, even in terms of magnitude and since direct dose measurement cannot be performed on all patients, it is nonetheless interesting to be able to assess, at least semiqualitatively, the amount of the above doses.     

The effect of equipment set up on patient radiation dose in conventional and CT angiography of the renal arteries

Patient radiation dose in angiography of the renal arteries was assessed and optimized after installing new radiological equipment. In three separate studies (n=50, 25 and 20) patient exposure was monitored in detail. For the first study default factory settings were used, for the second the number of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images was halved and the X-ray beam filtering during fluoroscopy was increased, and for the third study filtering during DSA was increased as well. Standard projections were derived and used in Monte Carlo simulations to derive dose conversion coefficients to calculate effective dose from the dose-area product (DAP). Dose conversion coefficients were also calculated for CT angiography (CTA). Using default factory settings on the new angiography system, DAP, number of images and effective dose were much higher than on the replaced unit. For the studies given above, DAP was reduced from 144 Gy cm(2) to 65 Gy cm(2) to 32 Gy cm(2), and effective dose from 22 mSv to 11 mSv to 9.1 mSv, respectively. Effective dose due to CTA was 5.2 mSv. It is concluded that modern angiography systems, resulting in high customer satisfaction, may readily cause much higher patient exposure than older systems. These doses may also be much higher than necessary. Optimization before putting such systems into use is absolutely essential. Internationally accepted recommendations for image quality and technique factors in angiography would be of great help.     

Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality

The recent introduction of "flat-panel detector" (FD)-based cardiac catheterisation laboratories should offer improvements in image quality and/or dose efficiency over X-ray systems of conventional design. We compared three X-ray systems, one image-intensifier (II)-based system (system A), and two FD-based designs (systems B and C), assessing their image quality and dose efficiency. Phantom measurements were performed to assess dose rates in fluoroscopy and cine acquisition. Phantom dose rates were broadly similar for all systems, with all systems classified as offering "low" dose rates in fluoroscopy on standard phantoms. Patient X-ray dose rate and subjective image quality was assessed for 90 patients. Dose area product (DAP) rates were similar for all systems, except system C, which had a lower DAP rate in fluoroscopy. In terms of subjective image quality, the order of preference was (best to worst): system C, system A, system B. This study indicates that the use of an FD detector does not infer an automatic improvement in image quality or dose efficiency over II based designs. Specification and configuration of all of the components in the X-ray system contribute to the dose levels used and image quality achieved.     

Patient dose during interventional neuroradiology procedures: Results from a multi-center study

Purpose

The purpose of this multicenter study was to determine the doses received by patients during interventional neuroradiology procedures and to consider establishing reference standards.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study of nine interventional neuroradiology departments was conducted. Seven diagnostic (cerebral and spinal angiography) and therapeutic (embolization and vertebroplasty) procedures were reviewed. For each procedure, three dosimetric parameters were recorded: dose-area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and number of images.

Results

Results showed interdepartment variations, up to four-fold for diagnostic procedures and seven-fold for therapeutic procedures. However, applying the 75th percentile method to the entire dataset, reference standards can be proposed for six types of procedures including diagnostic cerebral angiography (230 Gy cm²), follow-up selective cerebral angiography (80 Gy cm²), aneurysm embolization (350 Gy cm²), AVM embolization (440 Gy cm²). Reference standards are also proposed with regards to fluoroscopy time and number of images.

Conclusion

Such standards are useful for clinicians to evaluate and improve their practices.     

Radiation Exposure in Nonvascular Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventional Procedures

Purpose

To investigate the radiation exposure in non-vascular fluoroscopy guided interventions and to search strategies for dose reduction.

Materials and Methods

Dose area product (DAP) of 638 consecutive non-vascular interventional procedures of one year were analyzed with respect to different types of interventions; gastrointestinal tract, biliary interventions, embolizations of tumors and hemorrhage. Data was analyzed with special focus on the fluoroscopy doses and frame doses. The third quartiles (Q3) of fluoroscopy dose values were defined in order to set a reference value for our in-hospital practice.

Results

Mean fluoroscopy times of gastrostomy, jejunostomy, right and left sided percutaneous biliary drainage, chemoembolization of the liver and embolization due to various hemorrhages were 5.9, 8.6, 13.5, 16.6, 17.4 and 25.2 min, respectively. The respective Q3 total DAP were 52.9, 73.3, 155.1, 308.4, 428.6 and 529.3 Gy*cm². Overall, around 66% of the total DAP originated from the radiographic frames with only 34% of the total DAP applied by fluoroscopy (P < 0.001). The investigators experience had no significant impact on the total DAP applied, most likely since there was no stratification to intervention-complexity.

Conclusion

To establish Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), there is a need to establish a registry of radiation dose data for the most commonly performed procedures. Documentation of interventional procedures by fluoroscopy “grabbing” has the potential to considerably reduce radiation dose applied and should be used instead of radiographic frames whenever possible.     

Impact of the introduction of 16-row MDCT on image quality and patient dose: phantom study and multi-centre survey

The purpose was to compare the image quality and patient dose between 4- and 16-row MDCT units and to evaluate the dispersion of the dose delivered for common clinical examinations. Four 4- and 16-row MDCT units were used in the study. Image noise levels from images of a CatPhan phantom were compared for all units using a given CTDI_vol of 15.0±1.0 mGy. Standard acquisition protocols from ten centres, shifted from 4- to 16-row MDCT (plus one additional centre for 16-row MDCT), were compared for cerebral angiography and standard chest and abdomen examinations. In addition, the protocols used with 16-row MDCT units for diagnosis of the unstable shoulder and for cardiac examinations were also compared. The introduction of 16-MSCT units did not reduce the performance of the detectors. Concerning the acquisition protocols, a wide range in practice was observed for standard examinations; DLP varied from 800 to 5,120 mGy.cm, 130 to 860 mGy.cm, 410 to 1,790 mGy.cm and 850 to 2,500 mGy.cm for cerebral angiography, standard chest, standard abdomen and heart examinations, respectively.The introduction of 16-row MDCT did not, on average, increase the patient dose for standard chest and abdominal examinations. However, a significant dose increase has been observed for cerebral angiography. There is a wide dispersion in the doses delivered, especially for cardiac imaging.     

Diagnostic reference levels and effective dose in paediatric cardiac catheterization

European states within the EEC are required to establish and use diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in X-ray examinations. However, up to now there have been no DRLs for cardiac catheterization in children, nor as a rule is the effective dose estimated. We have evaluated the dose-area products (DAPs) for three different types of angiocardiography systems over a time span of 8 years. For each system DAP increased in proportion to the body weight (BW) over two orders of magnitude. The proportionality constant decreased over the years. To reduce the broad distribution of DAP the doses for cine acquisition (DAPA) and fluoroscopy (DAPF) were indexed with respect to the total numbers of acquired images (AN) and the total times of fluoroscopy (FT). DAPA/AN is directly proportional to BW with a high correlation (r = 0.896, n = 1346). Likewise, DAPF/FT is proportional to BW from 0.1 kg to 100 kg (r = 0.84, n = 2138). Therefore, by normalizing DAP to BW the growth dependent variation of DAP can be eliminated. There are numerous short examinations with very small total DAPs, which were separated from the group of diagnostic examinations. The mean DAP/BW of this group is 0.41 Gycm2 kg(-1) (90th percentile: 0.81 Gycm2 kg(-1), n = 1106). For interventional procedures in congenital heart diseases DAP/BW is significantly higher (p<0.001) (mean: 0.56 Gycm2 kg(-1), 90th percentile: 1.16 Gycm2 kg(-1), n = 883). There are significant differences between different types of interventional procedures, the mean values being between 0.35 Gycm2 kg(-1) (occlusion of patent ductus botalli, n = 165) and 1.30 Gycm2 kg(-1) (occlusion of ventricular septal defect, n = 32). For patients who are catheterized several times over the years, the cumulative effective dose (E) may reach high values, being especially high for patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (typically 11 mSv). E is derived from DAP/BW by use of a constant DAP/BW to E conversion factor, independent of the age of the patient. DAP/BW is appropriate to describe paediatric DRLs and is recommended instead of using mean DAP values for age groups.     

Does digital flat detector technology tip the scale towards better image quality or reduced patient dose in interventional cardiology?

As dynamic flat-panel detectors (FD) are introduced in interventional cardiology (IC), the relation between patient dose and image quality (IQ) needs to be reconsidered for this type of image receptor. On one hand this study investigates IQ of a FD system by means of a threshold contrast-detail analysis and compares it to an image intensifier (II) system on a similar X-ray setup. On the other hand patient dose for coronary angiography (CA) procedures on both systems is compared by Dose-Area Product (DAP)-registration of a patient population. The comparative IQ study was performed for a range of entrance dose rates (EDR) covering the fluoroscopy and cinegraphy working mode. In addition the IQ investigation was extended to a similar study under automatic brightness control (ABC). As well the systematic study of IQ as a function of EDR as the study performed under ABC point to a better IQ for FD in cinegraphy mode and no difference between both systems in fluoroscopy mode. The patient population study resulted in mean DAP values of 31 Gy cm² (II system) and 33 Gy cm² (FD system) (p = 0.68) for CA procedures. As well total DAP as contributions of fluoroscopy and cinegraphy on both systems are not significantly different.To conclude, we could state that profit was taken from the intrinsic better performance of the FD for cinegraphy mode in producing higher quality images in this mode but without any effect on patient dose for CA procedures.