Sinus automaticity and sinoatrial conduction in severe symptomatic sick sinus syndrome.

Electrophysiologic studies with recordings of sinus node electrograms were performed in 38 patients with severe symptomatic sick sinus syndrome. Thirty-two of the 38 patients had episodic tachyarrhythmias and 17 presented with syncope. The clinically documented sinus or atrial pause was 5.6 +/- 2.8 s (mean +/- SD). Patients were divided into three groups according to electrophysiologic findings. Group I consisted of nine patients with complete sinoatrial block. Sinus node electrograms were recorded during the episodes of long pauses. Seven patients had unidirectional exit block, with the atrial impulse being capable of retrograde penetration to the sinus node causing suppression of sinus automaticity; two had bidirectional sinoatrial block. Group II consisted of 22 patients with either 1:1 sinoatrial conduction (group IIa = 13 patients) or second degree sinoatrial exit block (group IIb = 9 patients) during spontaneous sinus rhythm. Sinoatrial exit block, ranging from 1 to greater than 14 sinus beats, was observed during postpacing pauses that ranged from 1,650 to 37,000 ms (mean 7,286 +/- 6,989). The maximal sinus node recovery time ranged from 770 to 5,580 ms (mean 3,004 +/- 1,686) and was normal in 5 patients and prolonged in 17. Group III consisted of seven patients with no recordable sinus node electrogram, reflecting either a technical failure or a quiescence of sinus activity. The sinus node recovery time in these seven patients ranged from 1,190 to 4,260 ms (mean 2,949 +/- 1,121). Thus, abnormalities in both sinus node automaticity and sinoatrial conduction are responsible for the long sinus or atrial pauses in the sick sinus syndrome. However, complete sinoatrial exit block can occur and cause severe bradycardia with escape rhythm; repetitive sinoatrial exit block plays a major role in producing posttachycardia pauses.     

Sinus node electric activity in prolonged atrial pauses in subjects with the sick sinus syndrome

Sinus node electrogram (SNE) was recorded in 15 patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) in which prolonged atrial pauses were observed. The aim of this study was clarify the physiopathological mechanisms underlying atrial pauses as well as to evaluate the sensitivity of sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) directly measured on SNE and of SACT estimated with the indirect Strauss method with respect to the detection of SSS. The following results were obtained: Sinus electrical activity was recorded during atrial pauses (greater than or equal to 2 basic sinus cycle length) in all the 9 patients in which the pauses spontaneously occurred and in the 2 patients in whom the pauses of 2860 and 3190 msec were induced by atrial pacing. In one of these latter two patients, moreover, a complete electrical desynchronization was observed. In the remaining 4 patients in whom, pauses (greater than or equal to 3 sec) were induced by carotid sinus massage of in 3 no sinus electrical activity was detected on SNE while in 1 advanced sinus node desynchronization was observed. Direct sinoatrial conduction time was abnormally prolonged in 6 patients with SSS and indirect sinoatrial conduction time in 9 patients.     

Sinus node electrogram in patients with the hypersensitive carotid sinus syndrome

Sinus node electrograms were obtained in two patients with unexplained syncope and the cardioinhibitory form of the hypersensitive carotid sinus syndrome. Direct recordings of sinus node potentials were obtained using a transvenous electrode catheter. Sinus node function was normal in both patients during standard electrophysiologic evaluation. Carotid sinus massage was performed in both patients and the sinus node electrogram was continuously recorded. After the onset of carotid sinus massage, prolongation of sinoatrial time, slowing of sinus rate of depolarization, sinoatrial exit block and finally sinus node arrest were recorded. After termination of carotid sinus massage, sinus node potentials did not precede the first atrial impulse; subsequent beats showed markedly prolonged sinoatrial times as well as changes in the P wave on the surface electrocardiogram. Sinus rate and sinoatrial time returned to control values gradually, as did the P wave configuration. Intravenous atropine (1.0 mg) abolished the abnormal response to carotid sinus massage. It is concluded that the application of carotid sinus massage in patients with the hypersensitive carotid sinus syndrome produces profound changes in sinoatrial conduction including sinoatrial exit block, as well as shifts in primary pacemaker site and sinus node arrest. These alterations in conduction and automaticity are reversible with atropine and may be secondary to denervation sensitivity to acetylcholine.     

New application of direct sinus node recordings in man: assessment of sinus node recovery time

Sinus node recovery time (SNRT) is frequently used to assess sinus node function in patients with suspected sick sinus syndrome (SSS). Although SNRT is assumed to reflect sinus node automaticity, this assumption remains unproven. The purpose of this study was (1) to test the hypothesis that SNRT in patients with and without SSS reflects sinus node automaticity, and (2) to assess the role of sinoatrial conduction time in the measurement of SNRT. A total of 16 patients (mean +/- SD age 63 +/- 9 years), seven of which had SSS, form the basis of this report. An electrogram of the sinus node was obtained for each of the 16 patients, and overdrive pacing was performed in each at cycle lengths of 1000 to 300 msec. SNRT was measured (1) on the sinus node electrogram (direct method, measuring SNRTd) as the interval from the last pacing stimulus artifact to the onset of the upstroke slope of first postpacing sinus beat and (2) on the high right atrial electrogram (indirect method, measuring SNRTi). Results were as follows: (1) The longest SNRTd was significantly shorter than the longest SNRTi (989 +/- 304 vs 1309 +/- 356 msec, p less than .001). (2) For the first postpacing sinus beat there was a significant prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time as compared with that for sinus beats before pacing (319 +/- 152 vs 99 +/- 35 msec, p less than .001). Sinoatrial conduction time normalized within 3.6 +/- 0.96 postpacing sinus beats. (3) At the pacing cycle length that resulted in the longest recovery time, sinus node depression was seen in 56% of patients, sinus node acceleration was noted in 26%, and no appreciable change in sinus node automaticity was observed in 19%. (4) Sinoatrial conduction time for the sinus beat before pacing and that for the first postpacing beat was longer in patients with SSS when compared with in patients without SSS. (5) In patients with SSS the abnormal SNRTi, when corrected for the degree of prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time for the first postpacing beat, became normal in five of six patients. We conclude that (1) SNRTi reflects both sinus node automaticity and sinoatrial conduction time, whereas SNRTd reflects sinus node automaticity, (2) overdrive atrial pacing results in marked prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time for the first postpacing beat, which is longer in patients with SSS when compared with in those without SSS, and (3) in patients with SSS the inference of abnormal sinus node automaticity on the basis of a prolonged corrected SNRTi is usually incorrect.     

The sinus node electrogram in the evaluation of atrial pauses

The aim of this study was to establish the electrophysiological mechanism of atrial pauses, defined as a sudden lengthening of atrial cycle greater than or equal to 10% of its basal value. The sinus node electrogram (SNE) was recorded during electrophysiological study in 20 subjects. Satisfactory recordings of 64 pauses were obtained, 25 of which were spontaneous, 16 were induced by short periods of atrial pacing (AP) in normal subjects, whereas 23 atrial pauses were induced with the premature stimulation method. The basal sinus cycle and the one during the spontaneous pauses were measured from the upstroke slope on the SNE. The electrically induced pauses of the sinus cycle were measured from the artifact of the stimulus to the upstroke slope of the SNE of the first post-pacing beat. We have found that: 1-spontaneous atrial pauses correspond to a moderate slowing of the sinus cycle and to a depression of the sinoatrial conduction occasionally up to a second degree sinoatrial block. Only in subjects with sick sinus disease, the atrial pauses are induced by depression of the sinus automatism; 2-in normal subjects the AP results in a sinoatrial conduction delay; 3-the single extrastimulus regularly produces a moderate increase of the sinoatrial conduction time with variable but minimal effects on the sinus node automatism.     

Assessment of sinus node function in patients with congenital long QT syndrome

Sinus node function was evaluated in 4 patients with congenital long QT syndrome suffering from recurrent episodes of syncope and ventricular arrhythymias. Three of the 4 patients had bradycardia at rest on a 24-hour ECG. Sinus node function was examined by the atrial overdrive suppression test and the atrial premature stimulation test. Corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT) was prolonged in all patients. Total sinoatrial conduction time was also prolonged in 2 of the 4 patients. In all patients with abnormally high values, these values returned to normal after atropine administration, except in one patient. His prolonged CSNRT remained high after atropine administration, indicating abnormal automaticity such as that seen in sick sinus syndrome. These results show that sinus node function in congenital long QT syndrome is often associated with autonomic dysfunction, and sometimes with intrinsic disturbances of sinoatrial conduction.     

Study of the mechanism of an atrial pause using endocavitary recording of the sinus node potential in man

The aim of this clinical study was to determine the electrophysiological mechanism of spontaneous atrial standstill, defined as a sudden lengthening of the trial cycle to over 10 p. 100 of its basal value, by recording the sinus node potential by endocavitary electrocardiological techniques. Satisfactory recordings of the sinus potential were obtained for the study of 65 atrial pauses recorded in 31 patients (18 without sinus node dysfunction and 13 with sinus node disease). It was shown that atrial pauses, shorter than two basal atrial cycles correspond to a moderate slowing of the sinus rhythm and to a sometimes very significant lengthening of the sinoatrial conduction time when sinus rhythm resumed. Pauses longer than two basal atrial cycles were always due to sinoatrial block which sometimes occured in patients with clearly individualised sinus activity, and sometimes with a slow continuous sinus activity. The sinus period did not change during these long pauses and sinoatrial conduction was normal when sinus rhythm resumed. The increased duration of the sinus potential, a constant finding during these pauses, is related to an intrasinusal conduction defect. This suggest that the primum movens of sinoatrial block is intrasinusal block which prevents rapid recruitment of a sufficient number of elemental sinus potentials so that the resultant potential becomes subliminal and therefore incapable of passing the sinoatrial junction. Short-lasting atrial pauses with a normal response to extrastimulus or atrial stimulation and characterised electrophysiologically by an increased sinoatrial conduction time without block of the sinus potential may be opposed to long atrial pauses with the pathological response of sinus node dysfunction characterised electrophysiologically by block of the sinus impulse. In practice the ability to induce a long pause by atrial stimulation (sinoatrial block) revealing latent disease of intrasinusal or sinoatrial conduction, may constitute an essential physiological sign of sinus node dysfunction.     

Comparative study of sinoatrial conduction time and sinus node recovery time.

Atrial stimulation were performed in 5 normal patients (group A) and 4 patients with electrocardiographic evidence of sinoatrial disease (group B). The technique of premature atrial stimulation was used to calculate sinoatrial conduction time. Rapid atrial pacing was applied to measure maximum sinus node recovery time. In 4 cases both stimulation methods were repeated after intravenous administration of atropine Group A had a sinoatrial conduction time of 56 ms +/- 11 (SD) and a maximum sinus node recovery time of 1122 ms +/- 158. In 3 out of 4 patients with sinus node dysfunction a prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time could be demonstrated (145, 105, and 150 ms). In addition, one showed probable sinus node exit block after premature atrial stimulation. Sinus node recovery time was excessively prolonged in 2 (3880 and 3215 ms) and normal in the other 2 patients with sinoatrial disease (1330 and 1275 ms). Atropine leads to a decrease of sinoatrial conduction time. Results indicate that sinus node recovery time may not be a reliable indicator of sinus node automaticity if sinoatrial conduction is disturbed. The premature atrial stimulation technique makes it possible to study the pattern of sinoatrial conduction and to evaluate its reaction to therapeutic drugs.     

Prolonged and fractionated right atrial electrograms during sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and sick sinus node syndrome

Intraatrial catheter mapping of the right atrium was performed during sinus rhythm in 92 patients: Group I = 43 control patients without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or sick sinus node syndrome; Group II = 31 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation but without sick sinus node syndrome; and Group III = 18 patients with both paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and sick sinus node syndrome. Atrial electrograms were recorded at 12 sites in the right atrium. The duration and number of fragmented deflections of the atrial electrograms were quantitatively measured. The mean duration and number of fragmented deflections of the 516 atrial electrograms in Group I were 74 +/- 11 ms and 3.9 +/- 1.3, respectively. The criteria for an abnormal atrial electrogram were defined as a duration of greater than or equal to 100 ms or eight or more fragmented deflections, or both. Abnormal atrial electrograms were observed in 10 patients (23.3%) in Group I, 21 patients (67.7%) in Group II and 15 patients (83.3%) in Group III (Group II versus Group I, p less than 0.001; Group III versus Group I, p less than 0.001). The mean number of abnormal electrograms per patient with an abnormal electrogram was 1.3 +/- 0.7 in Group I, 2.5 +/- 1.9 in Group II and 3.5 +/- 2.5 in Group III (Group I versus Group II, p less than 0.01; Group II versus Group III, p less than 0.05). A prolonged and fractionated atrial electrogram characteristic of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation can be closely related to the vulnerability of the atrial muscle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparative study of sinoatrial conduction time and sinus node recovery time.

Atrial stimulation were performed in 5 normal patients (group A) and 4 patients with electrocardiographic evidence of sinoatrial disease (group B). The technique of premature atrial stimulation was used to calculate sinoatrial conduction time. Rapid atrial pacing was applied to measure maximum sinus node recovery time. In 4 cases both stimulation methods were repeated after intravenous administration of atropine Group A had a sinoatrial conduction time of 56 ms +/- 11 (SD) and a maximum sinus node recovery time of 1122 ms +/- 158. In 3 out of 4 patients with sinus node dysfunction a prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time could be demonstrated (145, 105, and 150 ms). In addition, one showed probable sinus node exit block after premature atrial stimulation. Sinus node recovery time was excessively prolonged in 2 (3880 and 3215 ms) and normal in the other 2 patients with sinoatrial disease (1330 and 1275 ms). Atropine leads to a decrease of sinoatrial conduction time. Results indicate that sinus node recovery time may not be a reliable indicator of sinus node automaticity if sinoatrial conduction is disturbed. The premature atrial stimulation technique makes it possible to study the pattern of sinoatrial conduction and to evaluate its reaction to therapeutic drugs.     

Sick sinus syndrome: the role of hypervagotonia

A 58-year-old man with persistent symptomatic sinus bradycardia (52 beats/min) showed a markedly prolonged postpacing pause (3240 msec) after atrial pacing at a cycle of 840 msec. In addition, Wenckebach block occurred following atrial pacing at a cycle length of 700 msec. After atropine (2 mg) postpacing pauses returned to normal value and type 1 second-degree AV block completely reversed to 1:1 AV conduction until paced rates greater than 140/min. It may be that in some patients marked and persistent vagal overactivity may predispose to "intrinsic" sinus node dysfunction; in later stages, sinus node function may paradoxically result unaffected by changes in autonomic tone.     

Complete sinoatrial block in two patients with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome

Electrophysiologic studies with recordings of sinus node electrograms were performed in two patients with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome. In both patients, the rest electrocardiogram showed apparent sinus bradycardia. Patient 1 had frequent paroxysms of atrial tachycardia with long pauses of up to 10 seconds; Patient 2 had paroxysmal atrial flutter and atrial pauses of up to 8 seconds. Multiple, repetitive, low frequency deflections, with a cycle length ranging from 730 to 960 ms in Case 1 and 570 to 750 ms in Case 2, suggestive of sinus node electrograms, were recorded at a critical area at the junction between the superior vena cava and the right atrium. These low frequency deflections had no relation to spontaneous junctional beats or the spontaneous atrial beats that showed high frequency deflections on the atrial electrogram. However, they could be suppressed by spontaneous or paced atrial beats. Pharmacologic interventions in Case 2 showed that the cycle length of the low frequency deflections shortened after administration of isoproterenol and did not change after propranolol or atropine. Thus, complete sinoatrial exit block with intact entrance conduction can occur in patients with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome. Under such circumstances, the surface electrocardiographic manifestation of sinus bradycardia may not be of sinus origin.     

Different distribution of abnormal endocardial electrograms within the right atrium in patients with sick sinus syndrome.

BACKGROUND--Prolonged and fractionated right atrial endocardial electrograms are characteristic of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (idiopathic or associated with sick sinus syndrome). The distribution of these abnormal atrial electrograms within the right atrium and the way it is related to the likelihood that patients with sick sinus syndrome will develop paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was studied. METHODS--Endocardial catheter mapping of the right atrium during sinus rhythm was performed in 41 control patients with normal sinus node function and without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, in 33 patients with sick sinus syndrome but without tachycardia, and in 27 patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (group 3). The bipolar electrograms were recorded at 12 sites in the right atrium and an abnormal atrial electrogram was defined as lasting > or = 100 ms and/or showing eight or more fragmented deflections. RESULTS--1195 atrial endocardial electrograms were assessed and quantitatively measured. In patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation 54% of the abnormal atrial electrograms were recorded from the high right atrium, 28% from the mild right atrium, and 18% from the low right atrium. However, in patients with sick sinus syndrome without tachycardia 78% of the abnormal atrial electrograms were recorded from the high right atrium and 22% from the mid right atrium. No abnormal electrograms were recorded from the low right atrium. CONCLUSIONS--In patients with sick sinus syndrome without tachycardia abnormal atrial electrograms generally came from the high right atrium but in patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation abnormal atrial electrograms were more widely distributed in the right atrium. In patients with sick sinus syndrome the greater the extent of the compromised atrial muscle, the greater the likelihood that paroxysmal atrial fibrillation will develop.     

Electrophysiologic manifestations in so-called "sick sinus syndrome"

Electrophysiologic disorders in 17 patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) were assessed by recording of intracardiac electrograms, atrial overdrive pacing and extrastimulus technique. Significant suppression of the sinoatrial node (SAN) by overdrive pacing (maximum corrected SAN recovery time of longer than 560 msec) was noted in 14 or 16 patients studied. In nine patients, scanning with atrial extrastimuli, sinus rest was defined in all. In one patient there was a longer interpolation zone. Calculated sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) in individual patients varied considerably. The mean SACT was over 110 msec in 5 of 9 patients (56%). Sinus echo was demonstrated in 3; one manifested SAN- re-entrant tachycardia with rates of 72 to 77 beats/min. AV nodal echo was demonstrated in 3, two of them manifested AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia. Intracardiac electrograms revealed prolonged AV conduction time in 2 of 15 patients and prolonged His-Purkinje system conduction time in 2 of 17 patients studied. Two patients disclosed what we thought to be manifestation of intraatrial conduction disturbance. Both had considerable time interval between pacing impulse and atrial response. In one of them Mobitz type 1 and 2:1 intraatrial blocks were observed on atrial pacing and a possible internodal tract depolarization was also recorded. It is concluded that the electrophysiologic manifestations of patients with SSS cover a wide spectrum. The machanism of tachycardia can be due to either SAN or AV nodal re-entry.     

Different distribution of abnormal endocardial electrograms within the right atrium in patients with sick sinus syndrome

Background—Prolonged and fractionated right atrial endocardial electrograms are characteristic of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (idiopathic or associated with sick sinus syndrome). The distribution of these abnormal atrial electrograms within the right atrium and the way it is related to the likelihood that patients with sick sinus syndrome will develop paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was studied.Methods—Endocardial catheter mapping of the right atrium during sinus rhythm was performed in 41 control patients with normal sinus node function and without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, in 33 patients with sick sinus syndrome but without tachycardia, and in 27 patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (group 3). The bipolar electrograms were recorded at 12 sites in the right atrium and an abnormal atrial electrogram was defined as lasting ≥100 ms and/or showing eight or more fragmented deflections.Results—1195 atrial endocardial electrograms were assessed and quantitatively measured. In patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation 54% of the abnormal atrial electrograms were recorded from the high right atrium, 28% from the mid right atrium, and 18% from the low right atrium. However, in patients with sick sinus syndrome without tachycardia 78% of the abnormal atrial electrograms were recorded from the high right atrium and 22% from the mid right atrium. No abnormal electrograms were recorded from the low right atrium.Conclusions—In patients with sick sinus syndrome without tachycardia abnormal atrial electrograms generally came from the high right atrium but in patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation abnormal atrial electrograms were more widely distributed in the right atrium. In patients with sick sinus syndrome the greater the extent of the compromised atrial muscle, the greater the likelihood that paroxysmal atrial fibrillation will develop.     

Assessment of sinus node function in asymptomatic subjects with sinus bradycardia and in symptomatic patients with sino-atrial disease.

Sinus node function was evaluated in 18 patients with sinus bradycardia without complaints (Group I), in 16 patients with sinus bradycardia and/or sinoatrial block with complaints (subgroup IIa) and in 14 patients with the bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome (subgroup IIb). Mean values of corrected sinus node recovery time (CSRT), atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and atrial functional refractory period (AFRP) differentiated significatively asymptomatic subjects of group I from the two subgroups of patients with sinoatrial disease, but failed to differentiate each subgroup from the other one. There was no significative difference in mean sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) between group I and each of the two subgroups. Three patients of subgroup IIa and 1 patient of subgroup IIb had a false negative response after both overdrive and premature programmed atrial pacing. Spontaneous cycle length was directly correlated with the sinus node recovery time and the atrial refractoriness in group I, and with the only sinus node recovery time in subgroup IIb. No direct correlations were observed in subgroup IIa. This suggests a less disturbed sinus node automaticity in bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome.     

Different distribution of abnormal endocardial electrograms within the right atrium in patients with sick sinus syndrome

Background—Prolonged and fractionated right atrial endocardial electrograms are characteristic of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (idiopathic or associated with sick sinus syndrome). The distribution of these abnormal atrial electrograms within the right atrium and the way it is related to the likelihood that patients with sick sinus syndrome will develop paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was studied.

Methods—Endocardial catheter mapping of the right atrium during sinus rhythm was performed in 41 control patients with normal sinus node function and without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, in 33 patients with sick sinus syndrome but without tachycardia, and in 27 patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (group 3). The bipolar electrograms were recorded at 12 sites in the right atrium and an abnormal atrial electrogram was defined as lasting ≥100 ms and/or showing eight or more fragmented deflections.

Results—1195 atrial endocardial electrograms were assessed and quantitatively measured. In patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation 54% of the abnormal atrial electrograms were recorded from the high right atrium, 28% from the mid right atrium, and 18% from the low right atrium. However, in patients with sick sinus syndrome without tachycardia 78% of the abnormal atrial electrograms were recorded from the high right atrium and 22% from the mid right atrium. No abnormal electrograms were recorded from the low right atrium.

Conclusions—In patients with sick sinus syndrome without tachycardia abnormal atrial electrograms generally came from the high right atrium but in patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation abnormal atrial electrograms were more widely distributed in the right atrium. In patients with sick sinus syndrome the greater the extent of the compromised atrial muscle, the greater the likelihood that paroxysmal atrial fibrillation will develop.

     

Improved sinus node sensing after atropine.

Although atropine is known to increase sinus rate through its vagolytic effect, the effects of atropine on sinus node sensing are unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate alterations in sinus node sensing produced by atropine. Measurement of the zone of sinus node reset and sinoatrial conduction time was performed in 10 patients by programmed premature atrial stimulation. The zone of sinus node reset was determined as the transition point where premature atrial stimuli were followed by a less than compensatory pause. Sinoatrial conduction time was calculated from sinus node return cycles in the area where sinus node reset occurred. Atropine administration produced a significant increase in the percentage of the sinus cycle length at which premature atrial contractions penetrated and reset the sinus node. Sinus node reset occurred at a mean percentage of the sinus cycle of 71 +/- 8 per cent before atropine and 83 +/- 5 per cent after atropine (P less 0.01). The sinoatrial conduction time was significantly reduced from 109 +/- 29 to 62 +/- 23 msec. (P less than 0.01) from atropine as sinus cycle length was reduced from 909 +/- 118 to 642 +/- 75 msec. after atropine. Sinus node echoes were observed in two patients. In one patient atropine abolished the appearance of sinus node echoes. In the second patient atropine reduced the coupling interval necessary to produce sinus node echoes but appeared to facilitate sinus node re-entry by the appearance of an additional sinus node echo and a reduction in the echo cycle length. This study demonstrates that atropine produces significant improvement of sinus node sensing in man.     

经食管信号平均心电图记录窦房结电图的研究(英文)

目的探讨无创性经食管信号平均技术直接记录窦房结电位（SNP）的方法。方法采用自制三导心电微电位检测仪对256例窦房结功能正常者进行检测,其中男142例,女114例,年龄10～74（44.2±12.4）岁。将食管导联的信号放大（增益达到100μV/cm）、滤波（0.1～50）Hz,16位模/数（A/D）转换,系统采样频率2kHz,对食管SNP进行信号平均,并通过同步信号平均对人食管和心内膜所记录的SNP,犬食管和心外膜所记录的SNP进行分析研究。结果记录到食管SNP189例（74%）,所测信号平均食管SNP为P波前的低幅、低频波,可见有2种形态:园顶型（60%）和上斜型（40%）;窦房传导时间为（83.3±26.7）ms,分布范围为（23～118）ms;波幅为（3.5～27.7）μV;dv/dt为（0.43～1.93）mV/s。结论在适当滤波、高增益和抗基线漂移技术条件下,利用经食管信号平均技术,大多数窦房结功能正常的患者可直接记录到食管SNP。     

Sinoatrial pacemaker shift following atrial stimulation in man.

Indirect evidence of a sinoatrial pacemaker shift after programmed atrial stimulation in man is presented. Following electrically induced beats, time intervals and postextrasystolic morphology of atrial electrogram and P waves were scrutinized in 30 catheterization studies. Applying premature atrial stimulation, a decrease of the interval between the last basic atrial depolarization and the stimulus-produced atrial excitation (curtailed cycle) below a critical interval was followed by a sinoatrial pacemaker shift in three cases. This electrophysiologic event consisted of a concomitant change in shape of high right atrial electrogram and an increase of atrial cycle length. Simultaneous alteration of P waves could be detected in 2/3 patients. Assuming that the pacemaker shift indicates the arrival of ectopic activation in the sinus node, capture of the sinus node by the premature beat could be distinguished from failure to capture. Thus, pacemaker shift can be used for estimating sinoatrial conduction time in addition to present methods using measurement of postextrasystolic atrial intervals. The changes described could be seen both before and after atropine administration. Tracings of a pacemaker shift after cessation of rapid atrial pacing are also presented. In summary, we found a sinoatrial pacemaker shift underlying sinus node response to ectopic atrial activation in man, a phenomenon which contributes to our understanding of indirect assessment of sinoatrial conduction time by the premature stimulation technique.