Long-Term Prognosis of Low-Risk Women Presenting to the Emergency Department with Chest Pain

Background

Prognosis of low-risk women presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain has not been clarified. We assessed early and long-term outcomes of such patients and determined the need for predischarge testing.

Outpatient Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Scan for a Low-Risk Chest Pain Cohort From the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Analysis

Chest pain accounts for a significant attendances at emergency departments (ED). We examined the utility of early stress myocardial perfusion imaging (SMPI) for stratification of low-risk patients post-ED discharge. A retrospective audit was conducted of patients with chest pain and normal troponin-T (<30Ng/L), who were discharged with outpatient SMPI (median = 3 days post-ED discharge) between January 2018 to January 2020. 880 patients were included and followed up for 12 months. Outcomes measured were: 1) Cardiac events (CE) within 1 year of visit or 2) Significant coronary artery disease (CAD) - coronary angiography demonstrating ≥70% stenosis of epicardial vessels or coronary revascularization procedures performed. In the SMPI negative group, 2 of 802 patients (0.25%) had significant CEs and 11 patients (1.37%) were diagnosed with significant CAD. Of the 78 SMPI positive patients, 1 (1.28%) had a significant CE, while 24 had significant CAD. SMPI had a sensitivity of 65.8%, specificity of 93.7%, positive predictive value of 32.1% and a negative predictive value of 98.4% for predicting adverse CE. Early SMPI post-ED discharge demonstrated high negative predictive value in predicting CEs or significant CAD diagnosis at up to 1 year, suggesting that low-risk patients discharge from ED with early outpatient SMPI is a safe management option.     

Contemporary Emergency Department Management of Patients with Chest Pain: A Concise Review and Guide for the High-Sensitivity Troponin Era

This article synthesizes current best evidence for the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using high-sensitivity troponin assays, enabling physicians to effectively incorporate them into practice. Unlike conventional assays, high-sensitivity assays can precisely measure blood cardiac troponin concentrations in the vast majority of healthy individuals, facilitating the creation of rapid diagnostic algorithms. Very low troponin concentrations on presentation accurately rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and enable the discharge of approximately 20% of patients after a single test, whereas an additional 30%-40% of patients can be safely discharged after short-interval serial sampling in as little as 1 or 2 hours. In contrast, highly abnormal troponin concentrations on presentation (more than 5 times the upper reference limit) or rapidly rising levels on serial testing can rapidly rule in AMI with high specificity. However, approximately one-third of patients remain in a biomarker-indeterminate “observation zone” even after serial sampling. These patients pose a disposition challenge to clinicians because although the differential diagnosis of elevated troponin concentrations is broad, these patients have an increased risk for short-term major adverse cardiac events. Use of repeated serial troponin sampling and structured clinical prediction tools may assist disposition for these patients, because no validated pathways currently exist to guide clinicians. Ongoing research to tailor diagnostic thresholds to individual patient characteristics may enable improved diagnostic accuracy and usher in a new era of personalized medicine in the evaluation of suspected ACS.     

Hand-Held Echocardiogram Does Not Aid in Triaging Chest Pain Patients from the Emergency Department

Background: Accurate triage of emergency department (ED) patients presenting with chest pain is a primary goal of the ED physician. In addition to standard clinical history and examination, a hand-held echocardiogram (HHE) may aid the emergency physician in making correct decisions. We tested the hypothesis that an HHE performed and interpreted by a cardiology fellow could help risk-stratify patients presenting to the ED with chest pain. Methods: ED physicians evaluated 36 patients presenting with cardiovascular symptoms. Patients were then dispositioned to either an intensive care bed, a monitored bed, an unmonitored bed, or home. Following disposition, an HHE was performed and interpreted by a cardiology fellow to evaluate for cardiac function and pathology. The outcomes evaluated (1) a change in the level of care and (2) additional testing ordered as a result of the HHE. Results: The HHE showed wall motion abnormalities in 31% (11 out of 36) of the studies, but the level of care did not change after HHE for any patients who presented with chest pain to the ED. No additional laboratory or imaging tests were ordered for any patients based on the results of the HHE. Eighty-six percent (31 out of 36) of the studies were of adequate quality for interpretation, and 32 out of 36 (89%) interpretations correlated with an attending overread. Conclusion: Despite the high prevalence of abnormal wall motion in this population, hand-held echocardiography performed in this ED setting did not aid in the risk stratification process of chest pain patients.     

Disparities Exist in the Emergency Department Evaluation of Pediatric Chest Pain

Objectives. To identify and describe disparities in the provision of Emergency Department (ED) care in pediatric patients presenting with chest pain (CP). Patients and Methods. Nationally representative data were drawn from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). All ED visits with a chief complaint of CP and age <19 years from 2002 to 2006 were analyzed. The primary outcome variable was “Anytest” performed (defined as any combination of complete blood count, electrocardiogram, and/or chest x-ray). Univariable analyses were performed with “Anytest” as the dependent variable and patient characteristics as independent variables. Multivariable analysis was performed using logistic regression with the same independent patient characteristics. Results. Eight hundred eighteen pediatric CP visits representing 2 552 193 such visits nationwide were analyzed. Gender and metro/non-metro location were not associated with “Anytest.” However, Caucasian patients (p = 0.01) and those with private insurance (p < 0.01) were significantly more likely to receive testing despite otherwise similar demographics and severity of illness. Multivariate analysis revealed race (p = 0.03), expected payer (p = 0.003), and triage level (p = 0.009) were significantly and independently associated with the frequency of testing performed. Conclusion. Disparities exist in the ED care of pediatric patients with CP. Identification of such variations is important and provides an opportunity for targeted interventions that ensure delivery of high-quality, cost-effective health care for children.     

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Evaluation of Chest Pain in the Emergency Department

Coronary computed tomography angiography has emerged as an important diagnostic modality for evaluation of acute chest pain in the emergency department for patients at low to intermediate risk for acute coronary syndromes. Several clinical trials have shown excellent negative predictive value of coronary computed tomography angiography to detect obstructive coronary artery disease. Cardiac biomarkers such as troponins and creatine kinase MB, along with history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin score, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction score should be used in conjunction with coronary computed tomography angiography for safe and rapid discharge of patients from the emergency department. Coronary computed tomography angiography along with high-sensitivity troponin assays could be effective for rapid evaluation of acute chest pain in the emergency department, but high-sensitivity troponins are not always available. Emergency department physicians are not quite comfortable making clinical decisions, especially if the coronary stenosis is in the range of 50% to 70%. In these cases, further evaluation with functional testing, such as nuclear stress testing or stress echocardiogram, is a common approach in many centers; however, newer methods such as fractional flow reserve computed tomography could be safely incorporated in coronary computed tomography angiography to help with clinical decision-making in these scenarios.     

Usefulness of Combining Necrosis and Platelet Markers in Triaging Patients Presenting with Chest Pain to the Emergency Department

Background: Myocardial injury and platelet activation play important roles in the pathogenesis of unstable coronary syndromes. We sought to determine whether the combined measurement of platelet and necrosis markers would improve risk stratification, and yield higher diagnostic utility in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Methods and Results: Platelet and soluble P-selectin together with myoglobin, creatine kinase, CK-MB fraction, and troponin I were measured from the autologous samples in 122 consecutive patients. Statistical analysis revealed strong Spearman correlation coefficients (0.141–0.412; p<0.001) between platelet expression of P-selectin and plasma levels of necrosis markers. Platelet P-selectin and necrosis markers were independent predictors (c-index>0.7) for acute myocardial infarction, while plasma P-selectin exhibited random distribution. Elevated soluble P-selectin and myoglobin were the most valuable in identifying patients with congestive heart failure. None of the markers were useful for triaging chest pain patients with unstable angina. Analysis of incremental gains (Chi-squares) reveals that with respect to platelet P-selectin, myoglobin adds 50%% to AMI diagnostic value, and creatine kinase yields an additional 20%% in triaging these patients. The diagnostic value of soluble P-selectin is substantially (72%%) increased by myoglobin measurements, and enhanced even further (44%%) by adding cardiac troponin I for identifying heart failure patients among the chest pain population. Conclusion: Simultaneous determination of platelet and necrosis markers improve the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure among patients with chest pain presenting into the Emergency Department. Well controlled clinical trials are needed to prove the advantage of combining platelet and necrosis data over presently used techniques in emergency medicine.     

Adequacy of an Exercise Test in Excluding Angina on Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Chest Pain

Background: The clinical utility and cost effectiveness of exercise testing (ET) following evaluation by a cardiologist to exclude angina in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain was evaluated. Methods: Patients presenting to the ED with no apparent cause were evaluated. Of 239 patients presenting to the ED with chest pain without a history of coronary artery disease, 23 underwent sestamibi scanning with 216 undergoing ET. Follow-up evaluation was performed by telephone. Results: Of 216 ETs, 168 (77.8%) were negative, 24 (11.1%) positive, 24 (11.1%) indeterminate (209 discharged home directly). During follow-up (mean 20 months: range 5–37) there were three noncardiac deaths (malignancies = two, pneumonia = one) with five patients diagnosed with angina among the 168 with negative tests. Forty-two patients indicated unscheduled return visits (ED = 15, physician's office = 23, admissions = 4). The present management strategy realized a saving of Canadian (Cdn). $86,585.60 when compared with sestamibi scanning as the primary test. Conclusions: ET following an evaluation by a cardiologist can be used for the initial screening of patients presenting with chest pain to the ED with a high negative predictive accuracy with regard to future coronary events. Nuclear perfusion imaging can be used in a minority of patients where an ET is not feasible. A.N.E. 1999;4(4):408–415     

Long-Term Value of Stress Echocardiography in the Triage of Patients with Atypical Chest Pain Presenting to the Emergency Department

The purpose of this study was to assess the use of stress echocardiography in the triage of patients presenting to the emergency department with atypical chest pain. We hypothesized that a negative stress echocardiogram would identify patients with a very low risk for future cardiac events, thus reducing the requirement for unnecessary hospitalizations. Stress testing was performed in 105 patients presenting with atypical chest pain, no prior history of coronary artery disease, a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG), negative serial creatine phosphokinase level at 0 and 4 hours, and baseline normal echocardiagrams. Cardiac stress was invoked using an exercise protocol in 75 (71%) patients and intravenous dobutamine in 30 (29%) patients, with ECG and echocardiography results analyzed separately. Cardiac events (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and cardiac death) were noted in 7 (7%) patients with a mean follow-up of 2.8 ± 1.3 years. Univariate analysis identified five predictors of future cardiac events, but only stress-induced wall motion abnormalities were found to be predictive with multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimate of cumulative event-free survival for cardiac events at 3 years was 99% for a negative stress echocardiogram (no stress-induced wall motion abnormalities) compared with 95% for stress ECG (< 1-mm ST segment depression). The event-free rate of a positive stress echocardiogram and stress ECG was 25% and 63%, respectively. We conclude that stress echocardiography can be performed safely in patients presenting with atypical chest pain. A negative stress echocardiogram carries an excellent 3-year prognosis and thus identifies patients who may forgo hospital admission and further cardiovascular workup.     

Nuclear Cardiology in the Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department

Only a minority of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain will eventually be diagnosed with an acute coronary syndrome. The majority will have an electrocardiogram that is normal or nondiagnostic for acute myocardial ischemia or infarction. Typically, these patients are admitted to exclude myocardial infarction despite a very low incidence of coronary artery disease. However, missed myocardial infarctions in patients who are inadvertently sent home from the ED have significant adverse outcomes and associated legal consequences. This leads to a liberal policy to admit patients with chest pain, presenting a substantial burden in terms of cost and resources. Many centers have developed chest pain centers, using a wide range of diagnostic modalities to deal with this dilemma. We discuss the methods currently available to exclude myocardial ischemia and infarction in the ED, focusing on the use of myocardial perfusion imaging as both an adjunct and an alternative to routine testing. We review the available literature centering on the ED evaluation of acute chest pain and then propose an algorithm for the practical use of nuclear cardiology in this setting.     

Dobutamine Stress Tele-Echocardiography as a Clinical Service in the Emergency Department to Evaluate Patients With Chest Pain

Patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department should be efficiently triaged. During our previous research trial, the use of dobutamine stress tele-echocardiography (DSTE) effectively and safely allowed the diagnosis of patients who could be released from the emergency department. To assess the usefulness of DSTE as a clinical service, the protocols, training, and implementation of our experience are reviewed from > 4 years of testing 734 patients in our emergency department. The patient demographics of those tested appeared to remain consistent during the study period. An average of 12.5% of patients who underwent DSTE yielded abnormal results. In addition to myocardial ischemia, numerous cardiac disorders were uncovered. Side effects from DSTE caused the testing to be prematurely discontinued in 3.1% of patients. Within ∼ 6 hours of arrival at the emergency department, 70% were discharged after their normal DSTE. DSTE appears to be safe, rapid, and useful in triaging nonstudy patients with chest pain who are of low to moderate risk for myocardial infarction or ischemia.