Immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing for selecting MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutation carriers in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) represents 1-3% of all colorectal cancers. HNPCC is caused by a constitutional defect in a mismatch repair (MMR) gene, most commonly affecting the genes MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6. The MMR defect results in an increased cancer risk, with the greatest lifetime risk for colorectal cancer and other cancers associated to HNPCC. The HNPCC-associated tumor phenotype is generally characterized by microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemical loss of expression of the affected MMR protein. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of IHC for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6, and MSI analysis in tumors from known MMR gene mutation carriers. Fifty-eight paired normal and tumor samples from HNPCC families enrolled in our high-risk colorectal cancer registry were studied for the presence of germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 by DGGE and direct sequencing. MSI analysis and immunostaining for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 were evaluated. Of the 28 patients with a real pathogenic mutation, loss of immunohistochemical expression for at least 1 of these MMR proteins was found, and all except 1 have MSI-H. Sensitivity by MSI analysis was 96%. IHC analysis had a sensitivity of 100% in detecting MMR deficiency in carriers of a pathogenic MMR mutation, and can be used to predict which gene is expected to harbor the mutation for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6. This study suggests that both analyses are useful for selecting high-risk patients because most MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 gene carriers will be detected by this 2-step approach. This practical method should have immediate application in the clinical work of patients with inherited colorectal cancer syndromes.     

Microsatellite instability and mutation analysis among southern Italian patients with colorectal carcinoma: detection of different alterations accounting for MLH1 and MSH2 inactivation in familial cases.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is due to defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and has been detected at various rates in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The role of MSI in colorectal tumorigenesis was assessed further in this study by both microsatellite analysis of two CRC subsets [unselected patients (n = 215) and patients <50 years of age (n = 95)], and mutation screening of the two major MMR genes MLH1 and MSH2 among familial CRC cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PCR-based microsatellite analysis was performed on paraffin-embedded tissues. In CRC families, MLH1/MSH2 mutation analysis and MLH1/MSH2 immunostaining were performed on germline DNA and MSI+ tumour tissues, respectively. RESULTS: The MSI+ phenotype was detected in 75 (24%) patients, with higher incidence in early-onset or proximally located tumours. Among 220 patients investigated for family cancer history, MSI frequency was markedly higher in familial [18/27 (67%)] than in sporadic [32/193 (17%)] cases. Three MLH1 and six MSH2 germline mutations were identified in 14 out of 36 (39%) CRC families. Prevalence of MLH1/MSH2 mutations in CRC families was significantly increased by the presence of: (i) fulfilled Amsterdam criteria; (ii) four or more CRCs; or (iii) one or more endometrial cancer. While MSH2 was found mostly mutated, almost all [8/9 (89%)] familial MSI+ cases with loss of the MLH1 protein were negative for MLH1 germline mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Both genetic (for MSH2) and gene-silencing (for MLH1) alterations seem to be involved in CRC pathogenesis.     

Microsatellite instability and expression of MLH1 and MSH2 in carcinomas of the small intestine

BACKGROUND: Carcinomas of the small intestine are rare, but the risk is greatly increased in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) due to an inherited mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation, most commonly affecting the genes MLH1 or MSH2. Defective MMR is characterized by microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of MMR protein expression in the tumor tissue. However, a subset of several sporadic tumor types, including about 15% of colon cancers, also evolve through defective MMR. METHODS: The authors have assessed the frequency of MSI and analyzed the immunohistochemical expression of MLH1 and MSH2 in a population-based series of 89 adenocarcinomas of the small intestine. To study the contribution of MSI and defective MMR protein expression in young patients, 43 cancers of the small intestine from patients below age 60 years (including 24 tumors from the population-based series and an additional 19 tumors from young individuals) were also analyzed. RESULTS: MSI was detected in 16/89 tumors (18%) in the population-based series, and immunohistochemistry revealed loss of expression for MLH1 in 7/16 MSI tumors and in 2/73 MSS tumors, whereas all tumors showed normal expression for MSH2. Among the young patients, the authors identified MSI in 10/43 tumors (23%), and 6 of these 10 MSI tumors showed immunohistochemical loss of MMR protein expression, which affected MLH1 in 3 cases and MSH2 in 3 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of MSI (18%) in adenocarcinomas of the small intestine equals that of colon cancer. However, silencing of MLH1 seems to explain the MSI status in only about half of the MSI tumors. Among patients with cancer of the small intestine before age 60 years, MSI is found in 23% of the cases, with MLH1 and MSH2 being affected at equal frequencies, indicating that HNPCC may underly a subset of such cases.     

Use of molecular tumor characteristics to prioritize mismatch repair gene testing in early-onset colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The relationships between mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), family history, and germline MMR gene mutation status have not been studied on a population basis. METHODS: We studied 131 unselected patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed younger than age 45 years. For the 105 available tumors, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MSI were measured. Germline DNA was screened for hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6, and hPMS2 mutations for the following patients: all from families fulfilling the Amsterdam Criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC); all with tumors that were high MSI, low MSI, or that lacked expression of any MMR protein; and a random sample of 23 with MS-stable tumors expressing all MMR proteins. RESULTS: Germline mutations were found in 18 patients (nine hMLH1, four hMSH2, four hMSH6, and one hPMS2); all tumors exhibited loss of MMR protein expression, all but one were high MSI or low MSI, and nine were from a family fulfilling Amsterdam Criteria. Sensitivities of IHC testing, MSI (high or low), and Amsterdam Criteria for MMR gene mutation were 100%, 94%, and 50%, respectively. Corresponding positive predictive values were 69%, 50%, and 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor IHC analysis of four MMR proteins and MSI testing provide a highly sensitive strategy for identifying MMR gene mutation-carrying, early-onset colorectal cancer patients, half of whom would have been missed using Amsterdam Criteria alone. Tumor-based approaches for triaging early-onset colorectal cancer patients for MMR gene mutation testing, irrespective of family history, appear to be an efficient screening strategy for HNPCC.     

Relationship between MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 gene-specific alterations and tumor mutational burden in 1057 microsatellite instability-high solid tumors

Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are predictive biomarkers for immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Still, the relationship between the underlying cause(s) of MSI and TMB in tumors remains poorly defined. We investigated associations of TMB to mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression patterns by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MMR mutations in a diverse sample of tumors. Hypothesized differences were identified by the protein/gene affected/mutated and the tumor histology/primary site. Overall, 1057 MSI-H tumors were identified from the 32 932 tested. MSI was examined by NGS using 7000+ target microsatellite loci. TMB was calculated using only nonsynonymous missense mutations sequenced with a 592-gene panel; a subset of MSI-H tumors also had MMR IHC performed. Analyses examined TMB by MMR protein heterodimer impacted (loss of MLH1/PMS2 vs. MSH2/MSH6 expression) and gene-specific mutations. The sample was 54.6% female; mean age was 63.5 years. Among IHC tested tumors, loss of co-expression of MLH1/PMS2 was more common (n = 544/705, 77.2%) than loss of MSH2/MSH6 (n = 81/705, 11.5%; P < .0001), and was associated with lower mean TMB (MLH1/PMS2: 25.03 mut/Mb vs MSH2/MSH6 46.83 mut/Mb; P < .0001). TMB also varied by tumor histology: colorectal cancers demonstrating MLH1/PMS2 loss had higher TMBs (33.14 mut/Mb) than endometrial cancers (20.60 mut/Mb) and other tumors (25.59 mut/Mb; P < .0001). MMR gene mutations were detected in 42.0% of tumors; among these, MSH6 mutations were most common (25.7%). MSH6 mutation patterns showed variability by tumor histology and TMB. TMB varies by underlying cause(s) of MSI and tumor histology; this heterogeneity may contribute to differences in response to ICI.     

Toward new strategies to select young endometrial cancer patients for mismatch repair gene mutation analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of mismatch repair (MMR) gene germline mutations in endometrial cancer patients who were diagnosed at less than 50 years of age; to relate the presence of mutations to family history, histopathologic data, presence of tumor microsatellite instability (MSI), and immunostaining; and to formulate criteria for genetic testing in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Endometrial cancer patients (N = 58), who were diagnosed at less than 50 years of age, were included and questioned about their family history. Mutation analysis of the MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes was performed (denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and sequence analysis to detect small mutations and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification to detect large deletions or duplications). For MSI analysis, five consensus markers were used, and immunostaining of the three MMR proteins was performed. RESULTS: In five of 22 patients with a positive first-degree family history for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)-related cancers, pathogenic germline mutations were found (one MLH1, three MSH2, and one MSH6). Four mutation carriers belonged to families fulfilling the revised Amsterdam criteria. No mutations were found in the 35 patients without such family history (P =.006). MSI was detected in 20 of 57 cancers, among which four were from mutation carriers. In 23 of 51 cancers, one or more MMR protein was absent; in all five mutation carriers, immunostaining indicated the involved MMR gene. CONCLUSION: In 23% of the young endometrial cancer patients with at least one first-degree relative with an HNPCC-related cancer, an MMR gene mutation was detected. Therefore, presence of an HNPCC-related cancer in a first-degree relative seems to be an important selection criterion for mutation analysis. Subsequent immunostaining of MMR proteins will point to the gene(s) that should be analyzed.     

The added value of PMS2 immunostaining in the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Identification and characterization of the genetic background in patients with the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome is important since control programmes can in a cost-effective manner prevent cancer development in high-risk individuals. HNPCC is caused by germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations and the genetic analysis of HNPCC therefore includes assessment of microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemical MMR protein expression in the tumor tissue. MSI is found in >95% of the HNPCC-associated tumors and immunostaining using antibodies against the MMR proteins MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 has been found to correctly pinpoint the affected gene in about 90% of the cases. The PMS2 antibody was the most recently developed and we have in a clinical material assessed the added value of PMS2 immunostaining in 213 patients with suspected hereditary colorectal cancer. All 119 MSS tumors showed retained expression for all four antibodies and PMS2 did thus not identify any underlying MMR defect in these cases. However, PMS2 immunostaining contributed to the characterization of the MMR defect in a subset of the MSI tumors. Concomitant loss of MLH1 and PMS2, which functionally interact in the MutLα complex, was found in 98% of the tumors from patients with germline MLH1 mutations. Among the 12 MSI-high tumors with retained expression of MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6, 8 tumors showed loss of PMS2 staining, and mutations in MLH1 were identified in 2 and mutations in PMS2 in 3 of these individuals. In summary, isolated loss of PMS2 was found in 8% of the MSI-high tumors in our series, including 8/12 previously unexplained MSI-high tumors, in which mutations either in MLH1 or in PMS2 were identified in five cases.     

Lower incidence of colorectal cancer and later age of disease onset in 27 families with pathogenic MSH6 germline mutations compared with families with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations: the German Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Consortium.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was the analysis of the involvement and phenotypic manifestations of MSH6 germline mutations in families suspected of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were preselected among 706 families by microsatellite instability, immunohistochemistry, and/or exclusion of MLH1 or MSH2 mutations and were subjected to MSH6 mutation analysis. Clinical and molecular data of MSH6 mutation families were compared with data from families with MLH1 and MSH2 mutations. RESULTS: We identified 27 families with 24 different pathogenic MSH6 germline mutations, representing 3.8% of the total of the families, and 14.7% of all families with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations (n = 183). The median age of onset of colorectal cancer in putative mutation carriers was 10 years higher for MSH6 (54 years; 95% CI, 51 to 56) compared with MLH1 and MSH2 (44 years; 95% CI, 43 to 45; log-rank test, P = .0038). Relative to other malignant tumors, colorectal cancer was less frequent in MSH6 families compared with MLH1 and MSH2 families (Fisher's exact test, P < .001). In contrast, the frequency of non-HNPCC-associated tumors was increased (Fisher's exact test, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Later age of disease onset and lower incidence of colorectal cancer may contribute to a lower proportion of identified MSH6 mutations in families suspected of HNPCC. However, in approximately half of these families, at least one patient developed colorectal or endometrial cancer in the fourth decade of life. Therefore, a surveillance program as stringent as that for families with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations is recommended.     

Tumours with loss of MSH6 expression are MSI-H when screened with a pentaplex of five mononucleotide repeats

Background:

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is commonly screened using a panel of two mononucleotide and three dinucleotide repeats as recommended by a consensus meeting on MSI tumours held at the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD, USA). According to these recommendations, tumours are classified as MSI-H when at least two of the five microsatellite markers show instability, MSI-L when only one marker shows instability and MSS when none of the markers show instability. Almost all MSI-H tumours are characterised by alterations in one of the four major proteins of the mismatch repair (MMR) system (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2) that renders them MMR deficient, whereas MSI-L and MSS tumours are generally MMR proficient. However, tumours from patients with a pathogenic germline mutation in MSH6 can sometimes present an MSI-L phenotype with the NCI panel. The MSH6 protein is not involved in the repair of mismatches of two nucleotides in length and consequently the three dinucleotide repeats of the NCI panel often show stability in MSH6-deficient tumours.

Methods:

A pentaplex panel comprising five mononucleotide repeats has been recommended as an alternative to the NCI panel to determine tumour MSI status. Several studies have confirmed the sensitivity, specificity and ease of use of the pentaplex panel; however, its sensitivity for the detection of MSH6-deficient tumours is so far unknown. Here, we used the pentaplex panel to evaluate MSI status in 29 tumours known to harbour an MSH6 defect.

Results:

MSI-H status was confirmed in 15 out of 15 (100%) cases where matching normal DNA was available and in 28 out of 29 (97%) cases where matching DNA was not available or was not analysed.

Conclusion:

These results show that the pentaplex assay efficiently discriminates the MSI status of tumours with an MSH6 defect.     

Mismatch repair gene expression and genetic instability in testicular germ cell tumor

Human mismatch repair (MMR) genes encode highly conserved interacting proteins that correct replication errors predisposing to hereditary gastrointestinal and genitourinary malignancies. A subset of sporadic genitourinary tumors also exhibits MMR deficiency and can be identified by measuring the frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI) in cancer cell DNA. We investigated expression of the two most commonly mutated MMR genes, MSH2 and MLH1, in sporadic testicular germ cell tumor (GCT) in order to: (1) determine the expression pattern of MSH2 and MLH1 proteins in normal seminiferous tubules and histologically distinct GCT subtypes, (2) correlate MMR gene expression with genetic instability in GCT and (3) develop a panel of molecular markers that can identify genetically distinct subsets of GCT for prognostic assessment. MSH2 and MLH1 had differential staining patterns in normal seminiferous tubules and malignant tissues. MSH2 was expressed in all stages of spermatogenesis up to but excluding mature sperm whereas MLH1 was predominantly expressed in premeiotic germ cells. All histological GCT subtypes showed differential immunostaining for MSH2 and MLH1 however pure seminoma had statistically significant fewer low MSH2 staining tumors than other subtypes (p = 0.046). Twenty-five percent of GCT exhibited increased frequency of MSI (MSI+ tumors) with 73, 70 and 43% of MSI+ tumors exhibiting low MSH2, low MLH1 or low MSH2 and low MLH1 staining respectively. Fifteen percent of testicular GCT exhibited loss of heterozygosity (LOH) but no MSI (LOH only tumors). Only 28, 17 or 6% of LOH only tumors exhibited low MSH2, low MLH1 or low MSH2 and low MLH1 staining respectively.     

Microsatellite instability testing in colorectal carcinoma: choice of markers affects sensitivity of detection of mismatch repair-deficient tumors.

PURPOSE: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is found in 10% to 15% of sporadic colorectal tumors and is usually caused by defects in DNA mismatch repair (MMR). In 1997, a panel of microsatellite markers including mononucleotide and dinucleotide repeats was recommended by a National Cancer Institute workshop on MSI. We investigated the relationship between instability of these markers and MMR protein expression in a cohort of sporadic colorectal cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Paraffin sections of normal and tumor tissue from 262 colorectal cancer patients were examined for MSI status by PCR amplification and for MMR protein expression using antibodies against hMLH1, hPMS2, hMSH2, and hMSH6. RESULTS: Twenty-six (10%) of the patients studied had tumors with a high level of MSI (MSI-H). The frequencies of MSI were the same in African-American and Caucasian patients. Each of the MSI-H tumors had mutations in both mononucleotide and dinucleotide repeats and had loss of MMR protein expression, as did two tumors that had low levels of MSI (MSI-L). These two MSI-L tumors exhibited mutations in mononucleotide repeats only, whereas eight of the other nine MSI-L tumors had mutations in just a single dinucleotide repeat. There was not a statistically significant difference in outcomes between patients whose tumors were MMR-positive or MMR-negative, although there was a slight trend toward improved survival among those with MMR-deficient tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of microsatellite markers is important for MSI testing. Examination of mononucleotide repeats is sufficient for detection of tumors with MMR defects, whereas instability only in dinucleotides is characteristic of MSI-L/MMR-positive tumors.     

Mutations of the 'minor' mismatch repair gene MSH6 in typical and atypical hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Mutations of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1 and MSH2 are associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), a highly penetrant autosomal dominant condition characterized by hypermutability of short tandemly repeated sequences in tumor DNA. Mutations of another MMR gene, MSH6, seem to be less common than MLH1 and MSH2 defects, and have been mostly observed in atypical HNPCC families, characterized by a weaker tumor family history, higher age at disease onset, and low degrees of microsatellite instability (MSI), predominantly involving mononucleotide runs. We have investigated the MSH6 gene sequence in the peripheral blood of 4 HNPCC and 20 atypical HNPCC probands. Two frameshift mutations within exon 4 were detected in 2 patients. One mutation was found in a proband from a typical HNPCC family, who had developed a colorectal cancer (CRC), a gastric cancer and a rectal adenoma. The CRC and the adenoma showed mild MSI limited to mononucleotide tracts, while the gastric carcinoma was microsatellite stable. The other mutation was detected in an atypical HNPCC proband, whose CRC showed widespread MSI involving both mono- and dinucleotide repeats. The phenotypic variability associated with MSH6 constitutional mutations represents a complicating factor for the optimization of strategies aimed at identifying candidates to MSH6 genetic testing.     

Microsatellite instability and MLH1 and MSH2 germline defects are related to clinicopathological features in sporadic colorectal cancer

Clinical and pathological features were evaluated to predict tumor microsatellite instability (MSI) and germline mutations in MLH1 and MSH2 DNA mismatch repair genes in two patient groups with sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC): 38 young patients (age /=60 years). Nine (25.7%) young patients out of 35 and five (16%) old patients out of 31 exhibited MSI in their cancers. MSI+ cancers were related to proximal cancer and mucinous carcinoma independently of the age at cancer onset. Three (7.9%) out of 38 young patients had mutations in MLH1 and MSH2 genes that led to truncated protein products; they were all at age <35 years and showed MSI in their tumors, with mucinous histotype in two cases. In conclusion, histopathological and clinical features of CRC allow identification of cancers showing DNA microsatellite instability. MSI in CRC at very early onset (age <35 years) appears useful to predict germline MMR gene defects.     

Altered expression of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 in predisposition to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: A considerable fraction (30% to 70%) of families with verified or putative hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer fails to show mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Our purpose was to address the genetic etiology of such families. Materials and METHODS: We scrutinized a population-based cohort of 26 families from Finland that had screened mutation-negative by previous techniques. Blood was tested for allelic messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 by single nucleotide primer extension (SNuPE), and tumor tissue for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) as well as for microsatellite instability (MSI). Full-length cDNAs of genes implicated by SNuPE or IHC were cloned and sequenced. RESULTS: Unbalanced mRNA expression of MLH1 alleles was evident in two families. An inherited nonsense mutation was subsequently identified in one family, and complete silencing of the mutated allele was identified in the other family. Extinct protein expression by IHC implicated MLH1 in these two and in four other families, MSH2 in four families, and MSH6 in one family. Although no unequivocal genomic mutations were detected in the latter families, haplotype and other findings provided support for heritable defects. With one exception, all tumors with IHC alterations showed MSI, in contrast to the remaining families, which showed neither IHC changes nor MSI. CONCLUSION: Our expression-based strategy stratified the present "mutation-negative" cohort into two discrete categories: families linked to the major MMR genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 (11 [42%] of 26) and those likely to be associated with other, as yet unknown susceptibility genes (15 [58%] of 26).     

Evaluation of microsatellite instability and immunohistochemistry for the prediction of germ-line MSH2 and MLH1 mutations in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer families

Forty-eight hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC) families for which a tumor sample was available were evaluated for the presence of germ-line mutations in MSH2 and MLH1, tumor microsatellite instability (MSI), and where possible, expression of MSH2 and MLH1 in tumors by immunohistochemistry. Fourteen of 48 of the families had a germ-line mutation in either MSH2 or MLH1 that could be detected by genomic DNA sequencing, and 28 of 48 of the families had MSI-H tumors. Four additional families showed loss of expression of MSH2, and one additional family showed loss of expression of MLH1 but did not have germ-line mutations in MSH2 or MLH1 that could be detected by DNA sequencing. MSI-H, as defined using the National Cancer Institute recommended five-microsatellite panel, had a 100% sensitivity for identifying samples having MSH2 or MLH1 mutations or loss of expression. In contrast, loss of MSH2 and MLH1 expression did not identify all samples having germ-line mutations in MSH2 or MLH1, because in five cases, a mutant protein product was expressed that could be detected by IHC. A combination of the Bethesda criteria for HNPCC and an MSI-H phenotype defined the smallest number of cases having all of the germ-line MSH2 and MLH1 mutations that could be detected by DNA sequencing.     

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer in endometrial cancer patients

Endometrial cancer is the second most common cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). It has often been overlooked to explore the possibility of HNPCC in endometrial cancer patients. Our study was to investigate how many HNPCC patients existed among endometrial cancer patients. Among patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer at Seoul National University Hospital from 1996 to 2004, 113 patients were included, whose family history and clinical data could be obtained and tumor specimens were available for microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 proteins. There were 4 (3.5%) clinical HNPCC patients fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria II, and 2 (2/4, 50%) of them carried MSH2 germline mutations. There were also 8 (7.1%) suspected HNPCC (s-HNPCC) patients fulfilling the revised criteria for s-HNPCC, and one (1/8, 12.5%) of them revealed MLH1 germline mutation. In 101 patients, who were not clinical HNPCC or s-HNPCC, 11 patients showed both MSI-high and loss of expression of MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6 proteins, and 2 (2/11, 18.2%) of them showed MSH6 germline mutations. In 113 patients with endometrial cancer, we could find 5 (4.4%) HNPCC patients with MMR germline mutation and 2 (1.8%) clinical HNPCC patients without identified MMR gene mutation. Family history was critical in detecting 3 HNPCC patients with MMR germline mutation, and MSI testing with IHC staining for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 proteins was needed in the diagnosis of 2 HNPCC patients who were not clinical HNPCC or s-HNPCC, especially for MSH6 germline mutation.     

Screening for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) among endometrial cancer patients

Endometrial cancer is the most common cancer in women with Lynch syndrome. The identification of individuals with Lynch syndrome is desirable because they can benefit from increased cancer surveillance. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and desirability of molecular screening for Lynch syndrome in all endometrial cancer patients. Unselected endometrial cancer patients (N = 543) were studied. All tumors underwent microsatellite instability (MSI) testing. Patients with MSI-positive tumors underwent testing for germ line mutations in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Of 543 tumors studied, 118 (21.7%) were MSI positive (98 of 118 MSI high and 20 of 118 MSI low). All 118 patients with MSI-positive tumors had mutation testing, and nine of them had deleterious germ line mutations (one MLH1, three MSH2, and five MSH6). In addition, one case with an MSI-negative tumor had abnormal MSH6 immunohistochemical staining and was subsequently found to have a mutation in MSH6. Immunohistochemical staining was consistent with the mutation result in all seven truncating mutation-positive cases but was not consistent in two of the three missense mutation cases. We conclude that in central Ohio, at least 1.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.9-3.5%) of newly diagnosed endometrial cancer patients had Lynch syndrome. Seven of the 10 Lynch syndrome patients did not meet any published criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, and six of them were diagnosed at age >50. Studying all endometrial cancer patients for Lynch syndrome using a combination of MSI and immunohistochemistry for molecular prescreening followed by gene sequencing and deletion analysis is feasible and may be desirable.     

Analysis of mismatch repair gene mutations in Turkish HNPCC patients

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC or Lynch syndrome) is caused by the inheritance of a mutant allele of a DNA mismatch repair gene. We aimed to investigate types and frequencies of mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations in Turkish patients with HNPCC and to identify specific biomarkers for early diagnosis of their non-symptomatic kindred’s. The molecular characteristics of 28 Turkish colorectal cancer patients at high-risk for HNPCC were investigated by analysis of microsatellite instability (MSI), immunohistochemistry and methylation-specific PCR in order to select tumors for mutation analysis. Ten cases (35.7%) were classified as MSI (+). Lack of expression of the main MMR proteins was observed in MSI (+) tumors. Hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter region was observed in one tumor. Nine Lynch syndrome cases showed novel germ-line alterations of the MMR gene: two frame-shifts (MLH1 c.1843dupC and MLH1 c.1743delG) and three missense mutations (MLH1 c.293G>C, MLH1 c.954_955delinsTA and MSH2 c.2210G>A). Unclassified variants were evaluated as likely to be pathogenic by using the in-silico analyses. In addition, the MSH2 c.2210G>A alteration could be considered as a founder mutation for the Turkish population due to its identification in five different Lynch syndrome families and absence in control group. The present study adds new information about MMR gene mutation types and their role in Lynch syndrome. This is the first detailed research on Turkish Lynch syndrome families.     

Loci for efficient detection of microsatellite instability in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

Most hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is due to germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. Tumors arising as a result of these mutations display instability in microsatellites, which are short tandem repeats of DNA that are distributed throughout the genome. Although a subset of sporadic colorectal carcinomas also have microsatellite instability (MSI), the phenotype is a useful screening test in identifying patients with HNPCC caused by mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Studies have shown that some microsatellite markers are more efficient than others in identifying tumors with MSI. Furthermore, the frequency of instability can be assessed by categorizing patients into high (MSI-H, >/= 30-40% positive markers), low (MSI-L), and microsatellite stable (MSS) groups. Using a panel of 28 microsatellite markers, tumor and normal DNA from 10 HNPCC patients was used to identify the five most efficient markers for detecting MSI (BAT26, D2S123, FGA, D18S35, and TP53-DI). Each of the five markers detected MSI in 80-100% of the cases examined. We then expanded the sample size to 17 tumors from HNPCC patients. Each case had evidence for a mutation in either hMSH2 or hMLH1. We compared the efficiency of our panel of five best markers with another panel of five markers (BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D17S250, and D5S346) identified as being efficient markers for detection of MSI at a recent NCI workshop. Our five selected markers were more efficient (85% vs. 79%) in detecting MSI. However, using either panel, 100% of the cases fell into the MSI-H category and the probability of misclassifying an MSI-H case as MSI-L is very low (0.002-0.008). We also examined four cases meeting the Amsterdam criteria for HNPCC, but with no evidence for mutation in either the hMSH2 or hMLH1 gene. With our panel, three were classified as MSI-H, while only two were classified as such with the NCI reference panel. The probability of misclassifying an MSI-L case as an MSI-H, using a panel of five markers is high (0.263).     

MSH6 germline mutations are rare in colorectal cancer families

Germline mutations in MSH6 can cause HNPCC, which is associated with a tumor phenotype featuring MSI. However, tumors arising in persons with disease-causing mutations of MSH6 may or may not exhibit MSI. We used D-HPLC to screen for germline mutations in the promoter region, the coding region and the 3'-UTR of MSH6. Eighty-four families, enrolled on the basis of Amsterdam I and II criteria (HNPCC families) and less stringent criteria (HNPCC-like families), were tested for MMR gene mutations; 27 families had a disease-causing mutation in MLH1 or MSH2, and the remaining 57 families were tested for mutations in MSH6. Two protein-truncating mutations were identified in each of 2 families fulfilling the Amsterdam I criteria, being present in persons affected with early-onset colorectal cancers exhibiting MSI. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that expression of both MSH2 and MSH6 proteins was lost in the cancer cells of the 2 mutation carriers but only MSH6 protein expression was lost in 2 adenomatous polyps. A third possibly disease-causing mutation was found in a person affected with a tumor that did not exhibit MSI. In addition, we found 4 new polymorphisms and determined that neither of the 2 studied by association analysis conferred susceptibility to colorectal or endometrial cancer. Altogether, our results indicate that disease-causing germline mutations of MSH6 are rare in HNPCC and HNPCC-like families.