Effects of inhaled corticosteroids on growth in asthmatic children: a comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide.

In asthmatic children inhaled corticosteroids are widely used. However, there are some concerns about the systemic adverse effects of these drugs, especially in the growing child. We performed this prospective study in order to compare the effects of 400 microg/day of budesonide (BUD) and 250 microg/day of fluticasone propionate (FP) on growth in prepubertal (aged 4-11.5 years), moderate persisting asthmatic children. One hundred patients (51 boys and 49 girls), who were randomized into two groups, were recruited for the study. The first group was treated with BUD, 2X 200 microg/day, and the second group was treated with FP, 2X 125 microg/day, by using a medium-size volume-spacer metered-dose inhaler. Growth in children with asthma who were treated by inhaled corticosteroids was calculated by growth velocity over a 12-month period. Comparisons between treatment groups were calculated by t-test and chi-square test. There were no significant differences between BUD and FP groups for sex, age, first height, and growth velocity. Moderate persisting, prepubertal asthmatic children treated with 250 microg/day of FP appeared to have no different linear growth than those children who received 400 microg/day of BUD.     

Serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentration as an indicator of adrenocortical suppression in asthmatic children treated with inhaled steroids

ACTH regulates adrenal androgen production, which may thus be reduced during glucocorticosteroid therapy. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate is the most abundant androgen secreted by the adrenals. We wished to evaluate whether serum levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate can be used as an indicator of adrenal suppression during inhaled steroid treatment in children. Sixty school-aged children with newly diagnosed asthma were randomly divided into budesonide (n = 30) and fluticasone propionate (n = 30) groups. Fifteen cromone-treated children served as a control group. The budesonide dose was 800 microg/d during the first 2 months and 400 microg/d thereafter. The respective fluticasone propionate doses were 500 and 200 microg/d. Serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations were measured before and after 2 and 4 months of treatment. In the budesonide group, serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate decreased from the baseline by a mean of 21% (95% confidence interval, 13-29%; P < 0.001) after 2 months of high dose treatment and by 16% (95% confidence interval, 8-25%; P < 0.001) after 4 months of treatment. In the fluticasone propionate group, the respective figures were 10% (95% confidence interval, 4-16%; P < 0.01) and 6% (95% confidence interval, 16% decrease-3% increase; P = NS). A low dose ACTH test indicated adrenocortical suppression at 4 months in 14 (23%) steroid-treated children. In these children, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate decreased by a mean of 21% (95% confidence interval, 14-28%), whereas in those 46 steroid-treated children with normal ACTH test results, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate decreased by 8% (95% confidence interval, 0-16%; P < 0.05 between these groups). In the control group, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels tended to increase (by a mean of 26%), reflecting the normal physiological change at this age. In conclusion, inhaled steroid treatment suppresses dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate production in a dose-dependent manner. Monitoring of serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations can be used as a practical method to follow adrenocortical function and to detect its suppression during inhaled steroid treatment in children.     

Lung deposition and systemic availability of fluticasone Diskus and budesonide Turbuhaler in children

Pharmacokinetic studies can be used to measure lung dose of inhaled drugs. The aim of this study was to compare the lung deposition of budesonide (BUD) inhaled from Turbuhaler (AstraZeneca, Lund, Sweden) and fluticasone propionate (FP) inhaled from Diskus (GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK) and to assess if the study design used for pharmacokinetic studies can be simplified. Plasma levels of BUD and FP were measured for 21 hours on five separate days in 15 patients aged 8 to 14 years: (1) Intravenous infusion of 200 microg BUD, (2) intravenous infusion of 200 microg fluticasone dipropionate, (3) inhalation of 800 microg BUD via Turbuhaler, (4) inhalation of 750 microg FP via Diskus, and (5) inhalation of BUD and FP on the same day. Charcoal was ingested to eliminate drug uptake from the gastrointestinal tract. The mean lung deposition of drug after Turbuhaler and Diskus inhalation was 30.8 and 8.0% when BUD and fluticasone were administered on separate days and 29.5% (BUD) and 7.6% (fluticasone) when the two drugs were inhaled on the same day. Lung deposition is four times higher in children after inhalation from Turbuhaler than after inhalation from Diskus. Pharmacokinetic studies with BUD and FP can be simplified because the two treatments can be administered on the same day.     

Side-effects of fluticasone in asthmatic children: no effects after dose reduction.

To assess long-term effects and side-effects of fluticasone propionate (FP), a 2-yr study was performed, comparing a step-down dose approach (1,000 microg.day(-1), with reductions every 2 months to 500, 200 and 100 microg.day(-1) for the remainder of the study) versus a constant dose (200 microg.day(-1)). In 55 children with chronic persistent asthma, aged 6-10 yrs, airways hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and systemic side-effects (height, bone parameters and adrenal cortical function) were assessed at predetermined intervals in a double-blind prospective 2-yr study. AHR improved after 4 months treatment with 1,000 microg.day(-1) FP followed by 500 microg.day(-1), without significant differences during long-term treatment between the two approaches. Dose-dependent reduction of growth velocity, adrenal cortical function and biochemical bone turnover was found during therapy with 1,000 and 500 microg.day(-1) FP when compared with 200 microg.day(-1). In conclusion, doses of 1,000 and 500 microg.day(-1) fluticasone propionate are associated with marked reductions of growth velocity, bone turnover and adrenal cortical function. However, conventional doses (< or =200 microg.day(-1) fluticasone propionate) appear to be safe in the long-term management of childhood asthma. From a safety point of view, high doses of fluticasone propionate should only be prescribed in exceptions, e.g. in persistent severe asthma.     

Inhaled fluticasone propionate and adrenal effects in adult asthma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

The dose-response relationship of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) for adrenal suppression in adults with asthma is not clear. The current authors carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomised dose-response studies of >or=4 weeks' duration, which assessed the adrenal effects of FP by cosyntropin stimulation tests in adult asthma. The main outcome measure was the proportion of subjects with adrenal function below the lower limit of the normal range. Five studies, with a total of 732 subjects with asthma, met the inclusion criteria. Data on daily doses >1,000 mug were limited to one study. The proportion of subjects with adrenal function below the lower limit of the normal range on placebo was 3.9%; for a 500-microg per day increase in FP dose the odds of an abnormality increased by 1.38 (95% confidence interval 1.01-1.59). The continuous secondary outcome measures showed an inverse linear relationship with the FP dose up to 2,000 microg.day(-1). In conclusion, for routine prescribing within the established therapeutic dose-response range (50-500 microg.day(-1)), fluticasone propionate has minimal effects on adrenal function. This conclusion is limited by the paucity of long-term studies of daily doses of fluticasone propionate >1,000 mug and by the considerable individual variability in the response.     

Systemic effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide in adult patients with asthma.

We assessed the systemic effects of budesonide (BUD) and fluticasone propionate (FP) in 23 patients with asthma, using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, and cross-over design. The following five treatments were given in a randomized order for 1 wk with a washout period in between of 2 wk: (1) placebo; (2) FP, 200 micrograms twice a day, inhaled from a Diskhaler; (3) FP, 1,000 micrograms twice a day, inhaled from a Diskhaler; (4) BUD, 200 micrograms twice a day, inhaled from a Turbuhaler; and (5) BUD, 800 micrograms twice a day, inhaled from a Turbuhaler. The primary variable was the area under the curve of serum cortisol versus time (AUC0-20), derived from serum samples taken every 2 h over a 20-h period following the last evening dose at 10:00 P.M. The lower doses of BUD and FLU did not cause any adrenal suppression. Compared with placebo, however, FP (1, 000 micrograms, twice daily and BUD (800 micrograms, twice daily) decreased the AUC0-20 by 34 and 16%, respectively. Fluticasone (1,000 micrograms, twice daily) was more suppressive than BUD (800 micrograms, twice daily) (p = 0.0006). The FEV1, measured the morning after the last inhalation, was significantly higher after the active treatments, compared with placebo (p < 0.02), but did not differ between all active treatments. We conclude that high doses of BUD and FP (in particular the latter), inhaled via their respective dry powder inhalers for 1 wk, result in a measurable systemic activity in patients with asthma.     

Risk-Benefit Assessment of Fluticasone Propionate in the Treatment of Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis

Benefits

Fluticasone propionate (FP) is a new topical corticosteroid spray for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma. FP has been shown to be effective for the treatment of adult and pediatric asthma, even at rather low doses (25 μg twice daily [b.i.d.]); many studies in asthma have shown clinical efficacy of fluticasone at half the dose of the comparison steroid (such as beclomethasone dipropionate [BDP) or budesonide [BUD]). However, exact dose comparisons cannot be made because dose-ranging comparison studies have not been done. Studies in allergic rhinitis in children and adults have shown good efficacy in FP-treated patients at a dose of 200 μg once daily (o.d.), intranasally. In summary, FP is effective in both asthma and allergic rhinitis.

Risks

FP has minimal systemic activity because the portion of drug that is swallowed is not absorbed from the gut. Thus, the amount available for systemic activity is only that which is absorbed through the nasal mucosa (in the treatment of rhinitis) or through the alveoli of the lungs (in the treatment of asthma). When laboratory assays of adrenal function or bone formation are measured, FP and other inhaled corticosteroids can be shown to cause suppression of these markers, especially at high doses. There have been no consistent reports of clinical adrenal suppression or osteoporosis caused by FP.

In summary, the risk-benefit ratio of FP at the usual doses (therapeutic ratio) is very favorable. High doses may show evidence of suppression of the hypothalamic pituitary axis as measured by in vitro tests, but evidence of corresponding clinical adverse effects is lacking.     

沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松干粉与布地奈德干粉吸入治疗成人支气管哮喘的临床疗效和安全性对照研究

目的比较低剂量的沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松干粉剂(SM/FP)与中等剂量的布地奈德干粉(BUD)吸入治疗成年轻、中度支气管哮喘(简称哮喘)患者的临床疗效和安全性。方法采用多中心、随机、开放、平行对照试验,389例18～70岁哮喘患者按随机数字表法分为试验组[199例,吸入SM/FP1泡/次(每泡SM50μg、FP100μg),每天2次]和对照组(193例,吸入BUD,每次400μg,每天2次)。结果试验组和对照组患者晨间呼气峰流速(PEFam)在治疗的第1周末较基线值分别提高(26±2)L/min和(7±5)L/min(P均<0.01);6周后两组的改善分别为(54±6)L/min和(31±8)L/min(P均<0.01);治疗期间试验组每周均改善更明显;晚间呼气峰流速(PEFpm)与PEFam结果相似;日间和夜间症状评分在试验组和对照组治疗第1周比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);6周时试验组下降的程度与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);全天无症状天数的百分数试验组由治疗前的6.9%增加至治疗后的55.2%,对照组则由8.4%增加至36.1%。沙丁胺醇气雾剂的揿数在两组分别由治疗前的(3.32±3.15)揿和(3.21±3.23)揿下降至治疗结束时的(1.06±1.79)揿和(2.03±3.17)揿,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),试验组的用药揿数显著少于对照组;无需沙丁胺醇的天数试验组与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0     

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function after inhaled corticosteroids: unreliability of urinary free cortisol estimation

Free cortisol in the urine (UFC) is frequently measured in clinical research to assess whether inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) cause suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Thirteen healthy male subjects received single inhaled doses (of molar equivalence) of fluticasone propionate (FP), triamcinolone acetonide (TAA), budesonide (BUD), and placebo in this single blind, randomized, cross-over study. UFC output was measured using four commercial immunoassays in samples collected in 12-h aliquots over 24 h. The cortisol production rate was assessed from the outputs of cortisol metabolites. UFC showed a 100% increase over placebo levels in the Abbott TDX assay after the administration of BUD. The other assays detected variable suppression (ranging from 29-61% suppression for FP, 30-62% suppression for TAA, and 25% suppression to 100% stimulation for BUD). Suppression was more pronounced in the first 12 h after TAA and in the second 12 h after FP. Similar suppression was found in each 12-h period after BUD. UFC estimation based on immunoassays after ICS may be an unreliable surrogate marker of adrenal suppression. Many of the published studies describing or comparing the safety of different ICS should be reevaluated, and some should be interpreted with caution.     

Improved safety with equivalent asthma control in adults with chronic severe asthma on high-dose fluticasone propionate

OBJECTIVE: High-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have been associated with the same side-effects as oral corticosteroids. Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) in doses greater than 2000 microg/day are used regularly in severe asthma, despite the fact that safety and efficacy data at such high doses are limited. Fluticasone propionate (FP) has been promoted as being twice as potent clinically as BDP or BUD at doses of 2000 microg/day or less with a similar safety profile. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of FP with BDP and BUD in 133 symptomatic adult asthmatics requiring at least 1750 microg/day of BDP or BUD. METHODOLOGY: Patients fulfilling the entry criteria were randomized to receive either their regular ICS medication or FP at approximately half the microgram dose for 6 months in an open, parallel group study. The primary efficacy measure was based on morning peak expiratory flow measurements recorded by patients on daily record cards, while determination of safety was based on a number of endpoints including changes in bone turnover indices, the incidence of topical side-effects and assessments of quality of life. RESULTS: It was shown that patients who were switched to FP, but not those continuing with BDP or BUD, had significant increases in levels of morning serum cortisol and the urine cortisol:creatinine ratio while maintaining asthma control. Serum osteocalcin and the pyridinoline:creatinine ratio, as well as the deoxypyridinoline:creatinine ratio, were also shown to increase only in the FP group. Subjective assessments such as quality of life score, the incidence and ease of bruising, and reports of hoarseness also favoured the FP group. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that, at the doses studied and with the delivery devices used clinically, FP is at least as effective as BDP/BUD in the management of severe asthma and may offer clinical advantages with respect to steroid-related adverse effects.     

Therapeutic ratio of inhaled corticosteroids in adult asthma. A dose-range comparison between fluticasone propionate and budesonide, measuring their effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and adrenal cortex function

Inhaled corticosteroids have become the mainstay treatment of bronchial asthma. However, simultaneous evaluations of efficacy and side effects are few. This study aimed to compare the relative effect of fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide (BUD) on bronchial responsiveness and endogenous cortisol secretion in adults with asthma. The study was double-blind and included 66 adults with asthma, who were randomized to FP (n = 33) or BUD (n = 33). Prestudy, all participants were clinically stable, using inhaled corticosteroids and hyperresponsive to methacholine. Eligible patients were randomized to three consecutive 2-wk periods with either FP 250 microg twice daily, FP 500 microg twice daily, and FP 1,000 microg twice daily, or BUD 400 microg twice daily, BUD 800 microg twice daily, and BUD 1,600 microg twice daily, delivered by Diskhaler and Turbuhaler, respectively. Before randomization and at the end of each treatment, bronchial methacholine PD(20), 24-h urinary cortisol excretion (24-h UC), plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and blood eosinophils were determined. The relative PD(20) potency between FP and BUD was 2.51 (95% CI, 1.05-5.99; p < 0. 05), while the relative 24-h UC potency was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.44-0.83; p < 0.01). The differential therapeutic ratio (FP/BUD) based on PD(20) potency and 24-h UC was 4.18 (95% CI, 1.16-15.03; p < 0.05). The difference in systemic potency was also seen for plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and blood eosinophils. Therapeutic ratio over a wide dose range, determined by impact on bronchial responsiveness and endogenous corticosteroid production, seems to favor FP.     

A comparison of the relative growth velocities with budesonide and fluticasone propionate in children with asthma

There have been no previous large, well-designed direct comparisons of the effects of fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide (BUD) on growth in children. This randomised, double-blind study compared the effects on growth of FP and BUD in children aged 6-9 years with persistent asthma. Following a 6-month run-in period (without inhaled corticosteroids), patients with normal growth velocity were randomised to 12 months' treatment with FP 100 micro g bd (n=114) or BUD 200 micro g bd (n=119). Growth velocity was determined by stadiometric height measurement. Lung function, asthma symptoms and use of relief medication were also assessed. Annualised mean growth velocity during run-in was comparable in the two groups (FP: 5.9 cm/yr; BUD: 6.0 cm/yr). During the treatment period, adjusted mean growth velocity was significantly higher in the FP than the BUD group (5.5 cm/yr vs 4.6 cm/yr; P<0.001). Asthma control improved similarly in both treatment groups. Bone mineral density and overnight urinary cortisol:creatinine ratios were similar in the two groups. Drug-related adverse events were reported among 3% of FP-treated children, compared with 2% for BUD. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that FP for childhood asthma has significantly less impact on childhood growth velocity than a therapeutically equivalent dose of BUD.     

Adrenal suppression with dry powder formulations of fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate

Mometasone furoate (MF) and fluticasone propionate (FP) are high potency inhaled corticosteroids. The systemic bioavailability of MF is claimed to be negligible, leading to a minimal potential for systemic adverse effects. We assessed the overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine as the primary outcome of adrenal suppression in 21 patients with persistent asthma (mean FEV1 = 91%). Patients were randomized in a crossover fashion to receive 2 weekly consecutive doubling incremental doses of either FP Accuhaler (500, 1,000, and 2,000 microg/day) or MF Twisthaler (400, 800, and 1,600 microg/day). For the 21 per protocol completed patients, there was significant suppression of overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine with high and medium doses of both drugs-as geometric mean fold suppression (95% confidence interval) from baseline: FP 2,000 microg, 1.85 (1.21-2.82, p = 0.002); FP 1,000 microg, 1.45 (1.07-1.96, p = 0.02); MF 1,600 microg, 1.92 (1.26-2.93, p = 0.001); and MF 800 microg, 1.39 (1.04-1.88, p = 0.02). For secondary outcomes of 8:00 A.M. plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and early morning urinary cortisol/creatinine, there was significant suppression with MF and FP at the highest dose. Our data refute the assertion that MF has negligible systemic bioavailability and a lower potential for systemic adverse effects compared with FP.     

Improvement in health-related quality of life with fluticasone propionate compared with budesonide or beclomethasone dipropionate in adults with severe asthma

OBJECTIVE: Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were evaluated in adults with severe asthma following inhaled corticosteroid treatment with high-dose beclomethasone dipropionate or budesonide (BDP/BUD) and compared with fluticasone propionate taken at approximately half the dose of BDP/BUD. METHODOLOGY: HRQoL was assessed as part of an open, multicentre, randomized, parallel-group study in Australia evaluating the safety and efficacy of switching to fluticasone propionate (FP) 1000-2000 micro g/day (n = 67) compared with remaining on BDP/BUD >/=1750 micro g/day (n = 66) for 6 months. Patients completed two HRQoL questionnaires, the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36), at baseline and at weeks 12 and 24. A change in AQLQ score of >/=0.5 was considered to be clinically meaningful. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in HRQoL with FP on four of the eight dimensions on the SF-36 (i.e. physical functioning, general health, role-emotional, and mental health), while there were no significant improvements in HRQoL in the BDP/BUD group. Overall, patients in the FP group experienced significantly greater improvement (P < 0.001) in AQLQ scores at weeks 12 and 24 compared with the BDP/BUD group. On the individual domains of the AQLQ, there were significant treatment differences (P < 0.01) in favour of FP in three of the four domains (activity limitations [0.92], symptoms [0.73], and emotional function [1.02]). Mean differences between groups for overall score and these three domains were also clinically meaningful. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe asthma who received FP (at approximately half the dose of BDP/BUD) experienced statistically significant, as well as clinically meaningful, improvements in their HRQoL.     

Evaluation of adrenocortical function in 3-7 aged asthmatic children treated with moderate doses of fluticasone propionate: reliability of dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (dhea-s) as a screening test

BackgroundInhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the first-line therapy in the treatment of persistent asthma. At medium to high doses and prolonged usage, ICS can supresss the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA-S) is a corticotropin-dependent adrenal androgen precursor that is supressible in patients treated with ICS.ObjectivesTo evaluate the adrenal axis in asthmatic children treated with moderate doses of fluticasone propionate and to evaluate the DHEA-S as a possible marker for adrenal axis ?n preadrenarchal children.MethodsTwenty-eight children with persistent asthma with a mean age of 4.4 years (median 4.2; range 2.5-7.1) on long term treatment (mean 6.16; median 6; range 4.5-9 months) with moderate doses (mean 250; median 253; range 158-347 (g/m²/day) of inhaled fluticasone propionate were evaluated with low-dose ACTH stimulation test to assess adrenal function, and DHEA-S levels were compared with the results.ResultsOne out of 28 patients (3.57%) demonstrated an abnormal cortisol response to low-dose ACTH test. There was no correlation between DHEA-S and peak cortisol, morning cortisol and fasting blood glucose levels. However, mean inhaled corticosteroid dosages were inversely correlated with the DHEA-S.Conclus?onsIn most of the children with persistent asthma, mild to moderate fluticazone propionate doses supress the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis rarely. Chronic moderate doses of ICS may suppress adrenal androgen levels without supression of cortisol production. DHEA-S levels may be used as a practical method to follow adrenal functions and may be an earlier indicator of adrenal dysfunction in children.     

Adrenal function as assessed by low-dose adrenocorticotropin hormone test before and after switching from inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate to inhaled fluticasone propionate.

Low-dose adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) tests (0.5 microg/L 73 m2) were done before and after switching from inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate to inhaled fluticasone propionate in 12 patients 33-77 years old who had mild-to-severe asthma to compare the effects of these drugs on adrenal function. Low-dose ACTH tests were performed after the subjects had received inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (200-900 microg/day) for at least 12 wk. Treatment was then switched to inhaled fluticasone propionate (200-600 microg/day) for at least 12 wk, and a second low-dose ACTH test was done. Pulmonary function was assessed on the basis of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR, % of predicted value). After switching treatment, the daily dose of inhaled corticosteroid decreased by about 40%. Basal serum cortisol and ACTH levels were similar with both treatments. The adrenal response, as assessed by incremental rise in the serum cortisol level (peak minus basal) after ACTH challenge, improved significantly (5.6-7.9 microg/dL, p < 0.01) after switching to fluticasone. All three patients who had lower serum cortisol levels during beclomethasone treatment than during fluticasone treatment showed improvement in both the peak cortisol level and the incremental rise in cortisol. Mean morning and evening PEFRs significantly increased after switching from beclomethasone to fluticasone (morning: 71.2 to 76.0%, p < 0.01; evening: 67.3 to 72.1%, both p < 0.05). The diurnal variation of PEFR significantly decreased from 10.9% to 8.3% after switching treatment (p < 0.01). We conclude that switching from beclomethasone to fluticasone reduces the risk of adrenal dysfunction associated with inhaled steroids and improves pulmonary function.     

Nebulized Fluticasone Propionate vs. Budesonide as Adjunctive Treatment in Children with Asthma Exacerbation

Objectives: To compare the effects of nebulized fluticasone propionate (FP) and nebulized budesonide (BUD) in addition to inhaled salbutamol in children with mild asthma exacerbation. Methods: The study was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel group design. One hundred and sixty-eight children, aged 4-15 years, were randomly allocated to receive either nebulized FP (250 mcg) or nebulized BUD (500 mcg) twice daily for 10 days. On presentation, at the end of treatment, and after a 7-day follow-up, clinical assessment and pulmonary function measurements were performed. Daytime and nighttime asthma symptom scores, the use of rescue salbutamol, and morning/evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were recorded at home during the treatment period. Morning cortisol concentration (51 children) and overnight urinary cortisol excretion (30 children) were also measured in six centers at the start and at the end of the treatment. Results: Improvement of morning PEF was significantly higher in patients treated with FP (p = 0.032). The percentage of symptom-free nights was significantly higher in the BUD group (p = 0.006), but no difference was found in symptom-free days. No intergroup difference was detected in the percentage of days/nights free from rescue medication and in pulmonary function tests performed in outpatient settings. There was no evidence of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression. Conclusions: A short course of nebulized FP has the same effects as a double dose of nebulized BUD, when either drug is added to bronchodilator therapy in children with mild asthma exacerbation.     

Comparable effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide on the HPA-axis in adult asthmatic patients

This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre cross-over study compared the effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis of fluticasone propionate (750 microg twice daily given via the Diskus) and budesonide (800 microg twice daily given via the Turbuhaler). Two treatment periods of 2 weeks each were preceded by a 2-week run-in period and separated by a 2-week washout period. During run-in and washout, patients received beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or budesonide at a constant dose of 1500-1600 microg day(-1). Sixty patients aged 18-75 years with moderate to severe asthma not fully controlled by treatment with 1500-1600 microg day(-1) budesonide or BDP entered run-in and 45 completed the study. HPA axis suppression was assessed by morning serum cortisol (area under the curve from 08.00 to 10.30 hours) and 12-h nocturnal urinary cortisol excretion, measured at the end of run-in (baseline 1), at the end of washout (baseline 2), and at the end of each treatment period. Neither budesonide nor fluticasone produced significant suppression of either parameter compared to baselines. Only a few patients had serum-cortisol and urinary cortisol values below the normal range, before and after treatment. This shows that the patients did not have adrenal suppression before entering the study. The ratio between the AUC serum cortisol measured after fluticasone treatment and after budesonide treatment was 0.99 (95% CI 0.92-1.06), indicating equivalent effects on the HPA axis. This result was achieved after having omitted two patients' results, due to their very sensitive reaction to budesonide, but not to fluticasone. Two exacerbations of acute asthma occurred during budesonide treatment and none during fluticasone treatment. Both treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, budesonide 1600 microg day(-1) via Turbuhaler and fluticasone propionate 1500 microg day(-1) via Diskus had no clinical effects on the HPA axis in patients with moderate to severe asthma.     

Adrenal suppression from high-dose inhaled fluticasone propionate in children with asthma.

This cross-sectional study was designed to examine the prevalence of adrenocortical suppression in children with asthma treated with high-dose inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP). Children and adolescents (n=50) with asthma, treated with inhaled FP at a dose of > or = 1,000 mg a day for > or = 6 months, were enrolled. Early morning serum cortisol was performed. Subjects with a serum cortisol of < 400 nmol x L(-1) had a tetracosactrin stimulation test. Fifty subjects of mean age 13.1 yrs were treated with a mean dose of 924.7 microg x m(-2) x day(-1) FP for a mean duration of 2 yrs. Of the 50 subjects, 36 (72%) had serum cortisol levels of < 400 nmol x L(-1) and underwent tetracosactrin stimulation test. Of these, 6 (17%) demonstrated a less than two-fold increase in serum cortisol from baseline and peak cortisol level of < or = 550 nmol x L(-1) at 30 or 60 min poststimulation. There was a significant negative correlation between the dose of FP x m(-2) and stimulated peak cortisol level. Biochemical evidence of adrenocortical insufficiency was demonstrated in 12% of the subjects, indicating that high-dose fluticasone propionate use may be associated with dose-dependent adrenocortical suppression.     

Nebulized Fluticasone Propionate vs. Budesonide as Adjunctive Treatment in Children with Asthma Exacerbation

Objectives: To compare the effects of nebulized fluticasone propionate (FP) and nebulized budesonide (BUD) in addition to inhaled salbutamol in children with mild asthma exacerbation. Methods: The study was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel group design. One hundred and sixty-eight children, aged 4–15 years, were randomly allocated to receive either nebulized FP (250 mcg) or nebulized BUD (500 mcg) twice daily for 10 days. On presentation, at the end of treatment, and after a 7-day follow-up, clinical assessment and pulmonary function measurements were performed. Daytime and nighttime asthma symptom scores, the use of rescue salbutamol, and morning/evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were recorded at home during the treatment period. Morning cortisol concentration (51 children) and overnight urinary cortisol excretion (30 children) were also measured in six centers at the start and at the end of the treatment. Results: Improvement of morning PEF was significantly higher in patients treated with FP (p = 0.032). The percentage of symptom-free nights was significantly higher in the BUD group (p = 0.006), but no difference was found in symptom-free days. No intergroup difference was detected in the percentage of days/nights free from rescue medication and in pulmonary function tests performed in outpatient settings. There was no evidence of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression. Conclusions: A short course of nebulized FP has the same effects as a double dose of nebulized BUD, when either drug is added to bronchodilator therapy in children with mild asthma exacerbation.