Value of Examining Multiple Sputum Specimens in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

To objectively assess the value of examining multiple sputum specimens in maximizing the sensitivity of detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, we retrospectively reviewed the acid-fast bacillus smear and culture results of patients diagnosed with culture-proven pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) at Hennepin County Medical Center between 1986 and 1996. Two hundred and forty six persons were diagnosed with pulmonary TB in the time period analyzed. In 93% of these cases (229 of 246) the laboratory diagnosis was made by detection of M. tuberculosis in sputum specimens; however, only 52% (120 of 229) of these patients had at least three sputum specimens submitted to the laboratory at the time of diagnosis. Of the patients from whom at least three specimens were collected, 47% (56 of 120) had at least one smear-positive specimen; the third or later specimen submitted was the first smear-positive specimen for 13% (7 of 56) of these persons but was the first culture-positive specimen for only 7% (4 of 56). Of the 64 patients with smear-negative specimens, for only 5% (3 of 64) was the third or subsequent specimen submitted the first from which M. tuberculosis was recovered. This data indicates that, in our institution, the overwhelming majority of culture-proven pulmonary TB cases are diagnosed from the first or second sputum specimen submitted to the laboratory and that only rarely is a third specimen of diagnostic value.     

Molecular methods in the detection and identification of mycobacterial infections.

Nucleic acid amplification (NAA) tests for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens have the potential to provide a more rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) than is currently possible by conventional stain, culture, and identification tests. Currently, 2 NAA tests-enhanced Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct (MTD) Test (Gen-Probe, Inc) and Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis Test (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc)-have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for testing respiratory specimens that are smear positive for acid-fast bacilli (AFB). This restriction to AFB smear-positive specimens was based on data from the initial clinical trials conducted to evaluate these products that showed low sensitivity (ie, 48%-53%) and less-than-optimal specificity (ie, 96%-99%) in AFB smear-negative specimens. Data from the clinical trial for the enhanced MTD test and from 2 subsequent studies, however, suggest that this version of the MTD test is a reliable tool for rapid diagnosis of pulmonary TB, regardless of the AFB smear result. Both NAA tests have been evaluated for diagnosis of extrapulmonary TB, and results were comparable to the results of tests performed with respiratory specimens. The NAA tests also appear to be reliable for rapid identification of M tuberculosis complex in positive broth cultures of all specimen types except blood. The impact of the NAA tests on patient outcome varies based on the AFB smear result. With smear-positive results, public health and hospital infection control resources are predominantly affected. With smear-negative results, however, the potential for affecting patient outcome is much greater. In patients with smear-negative results, the NAA test can result in earlier diagnosis of TB and subsequent initiation of therapy. Use of these tests also may eliminate the need for invasive diagnostic procedures, which are costly and pose an added risk to the patient, and they may allow earlier discharge of hospitalized patients.     

Clinical evaluation of the enhanced Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis in prison inmates

The reliability of the enhanced Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test (E-MTD; Gen-Probe, Inc., San Diego, Calif.) for rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) was evaluated by testing 1, 004 respiratory specimens from 489 Texas prison inmates. Results were compared to those of mycobacterial culture (BACTEC TB 460 and Middlebrook 7H11 biplates), smear for acid-fast bacilli (AFB; auramine O), and clinical course. After chart review, three patients (nine specimens) who were on antituberculosis therapy before the study began were excluded from final analysis. Of the remaining 995 specimens, 21 were AFB smear positive: 13 grew Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), 6 grew nontuberculous mycobacteria, and 2 (from two patients diagnosed with TB and started on therapy after the study began) were culture negative. Twenty-eight specimens (20 patients) were positive for MTBC by culture and E-MTD. Seven specimens (seven patients) were positive by culture alone; three were from patients who had other E-MTD-positive specimens, two were false-positive cultures, and two were false-negative E-MTD results. Eight specimens were positive by E-MTD only; four specimens (four patients) were false-positive E-MTD results, and four specimens were from two patients with earlier E-MTD-positive specimens that grew MTBC. Thus, there were 22 patients with TB (10 smear positive and 12 smear negative). The sensitivity and specificity of the AFB smear for diagnosis of TB, by patient, were 45.5 and 98.9%, respectively. After resolving discrepancies, these same values for E-MTD were 90.9 and 99.1% overall, 100 and 100% for the smear-positive patients, and 83.3 and 99.1% for the smear-negative patients. Excluding the one smear-negative patient whose E-MTD-negative, MTBC culture-positive specimen contained inhibitory substances, the sensitivity of E-MTD was 95.2% overall and 90.9% in smear-negative patients. The specificity and positive predictive value of E-MTD can be improved, without altering other performance characteristics, by modifying the equivocal zone recommended by the manufacturer. These data suggest that E-MTD is a reliable method for rapid diagnosis of pulmonary TB, irrespective of the AFB smear result. Guidelines for the most appropriate use of E-MTD with smear-negative patients are needed.     

Comparison of the Xpert MTB/RIF test with an IS6110-TaqMan real-time PCR assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens

The sensitivities of the Xpert MTB/RIF test and an in-house IS6110-based real-time PCR using TaqMan probes (IS6110-TaqMan assay) for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) DNA were compared by use of 117 clinical specimens (97 culture positive and 20 culture negative for MTBC) that were frozen in sediment. The 97 clinical specimens included 60 respiratory and 37 nonrespiratory specimens distributed into 36 smear-positive and 61 smear-negative specimens. Among the 97 culture-positive specimens, 4 had rifampin-resistant isolates. Both methods were highly specific and exhibited excellent sensitivity (100%) with smear-positive specimens. The sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF test with the whole smear-negative specimens was more reduced than that of the IS6110-TaqMan assay (48 versus 69%, P = 0.005). Both methods exhibited similar sensitivities with smear-negative respiratory specimens, but the Xpert MTB/RIF test had lower sensitivity with smear-negative nonrespiratory specimens than the IS6110-TaqMan assay (37 versus 71%, P = 0.013). Finally, the sensitivities of the Xpert MTB/RIF test and the IS6110-TaqMan assay were 79% and 84%, respectively, with respiratory specimens and 53% and 78%, respectively (P = 0.013), with nonrespiratory specimens. The Xpert MTB/RIF test correctly detected the rifampin resistance in smear-positive specimens but not in the one smear-negative specimen. The Xpert MTB/RIF test is a simple rapid method well adapted to a routine laboratory that appeared to be as sensitive as the IS6110-TaqMan assay with respiratory specimens but less sensitive with paucibacillary specimens, such as smear-negative nonrespiratory specimens.     

Evaluation of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and detection of rifampin resistance in pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens

Mycobacterium tuberculosis remains one of the most significant causes of death from an infectious agent. The rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and detection of rifampin (RIF) resistance are essential for early disease management. The GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay is a novel integrated diagnostic device for the diagnosis of tuberculosis and rapid detection of RIF resistance in clinical specimens. We determined the performance of the MTB/RIF assay for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and detection of rifampin resistance in smear-positive and smear-negative pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens obtained from possible tuberculosis patients. Two hundred fifty-three pulmonary and 176 extrapulmonary specimens obtained from 429 patients were included in the study. One hundred ten (89 culture positive and 21 culture negative for M. tuberculosis) of the 429 patients were considered to have tuberculosis. In pulmonary specimens, sensitivities were 100% (27/27) and 68.6% (24/35) for smear-positive and smear-negative specimens, respectively. It had a lower sensitivity with extrapulmonary specimens: 100% for smear-positive specimens (4/4) and 47.7% for smear-negative specimens (21/44). The test accurately detected the absence of tuberculosis in all 319 patients without tuberculosis studied. The MTB/RIF assay also detected 1 RIF-resistant specimen and 88 RIF-susceptible specimens, and the results were confirmed by drug susceptibility testing. We concluded that the MTB/RIF test is a simple method, and routine staff with minimal training can use the system. The test appeared to be as sensitive as culture with smear-positive specimens but less sensitive with smear-negative pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens that include low numbers of bacilli.     

Nonclinical selection criteria for maximizing yield of nucleic acid amplification tests in tuberculosis diagnosis

In spite of the excellent performance of rapid tuberculosis (TB) nucleic acid amplification (NAA) tests and the clear benefits of immediate diagnosis of TB disease, NAA tests frequently are not used in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB cases, particularly TB cases with smear-negative sputa. Public health laboratories primarily perform TB NAA tests only on a targeted subset of specimens, usually including those that are smear positive and those for which a clinician has specifically requested NAA testing. As an alternative to targeted testing, some laboratories use TB NAA tests universally for all respiratory specimens, though this practice can be prohibitively costly and can be associated with an increased frequency of false-positive results due to testing of lower-risk patients. We propose a strategy for identifying individuals for NAA testing on the basis of nonclinical risk criteria that are routinely provided on the test requisition form, such as type of health care facility from which the specimen is received and patient age group. Use of this strategy at the Massachusetts Department of Public Health Laboratory would allow for NAA test identification of approximately 54 (74%) of 72 culture-positive pulmonary TB cases over a 1-year period while requiring NAA testing for only 933 (17%) of 5,469 individuals submitting respiratory specimens. We demonstrate that use of nonclinical NAA test selection criteria is an effective strategy for maximizing the number of TB cases that can be rapidly identified while minimizing the number of specimens that must be tested.     

Utility of PCR in diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis.

At present, the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis rests with microscopy. However, this technique is insensitive and many cases of pulmonary tuberculosis cannot be initially confirmed. Nucleic acid amplification techniques are extremely sensitive, but when they are applied to tuberculosis diagnosis, they have given variable results. Investigators at six centers in Europe compared a standardized PCR system (Amplicor; Roche) against conventional culture methods. Defined clinical information was collected. Discrepant samples were retested, and inhibition assays and backup amplification with a separate primer pair were performed. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms were recovered from 654 (9.1%) of 7,194 samples and 293 (7.8%) of 3,738 patients. Four hundred fifty-two of the M. tuberculosis isolates from 204 patients were smear positive and culture positive. Among the culture-positive specimens, PCR had a sensitivity of 91.4% for smear-positive specimens and 60.9% for smear-negative specimens, with a specificity of 96.1%. Analysis of 254 PCR-positive, culture-negative specimens with discrepant results revealed that 130 were from patients with recently diagnosed tuberculosis and 94 represented a presumed laboratory error. Similar analysis of 118 PCR-negative, culture-positive specimens demonstrated that 27 discrepancies were due to presumed uneven aliquot distribution and 11 were due to presumed laboratory error; PCR inhibitors were detected in 8 specimens. Amplicor enables laboratories with little previous experience with nucleic acid amplification to perform PCR. Disease in more than 60% of the patients with tuberculosis with smear-negative, culture-positive specimens can be diagnosed at the time of admission, and potentially all patients with smear-positive specimens can immediately be confirmed as being infected with M. tuberculosis, leading to improved clinical management.     

Xpert MTB/RIF: a New Pillar in Diagnosis of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis?

Approximately 10 to 15% of tuberculosis (TB) cases in India are estimated to have extrapulmonary disease, and due to a lack of diagnostic means, they often remain untreated. The early detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and multidrug resistance is a priority in TB diagnosis to improve the successful treatment rate of TB and reduce transmission. The Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) test, recently endorsed by the World Health Organization for the detection of pulmonary TB, was evaluated to test its utility in 547 patients with suspected extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Five hundred forty-seven extrapulmonary specimens were split and processed simultaneously for both culture (solid and liquid) and Xpert testing. For culture, the sensitivity was low, 53% (150/283 specimens). Xpert sensitivity and specificity results were assessed in comparison to a composite reference standard made up of smear and culture results and clinical, radiological, and histological findings. The sensitivity of the Xpert assay was 81% (228/283 specimens) (64% [89/138] for smear-negative cases and 96% [139/145] for smear-positive cases), with a specificity of 99.6%. The sensitivity was found to be high for the majority of specimen types (63 to 100%) except for cerebrospinal fluid, the sensitivity of which was 29% (2/7 specimens). The Xpert test correctly identified 98% of phenotypic rifampin (RIF)-resistant cases and 94% of phenotypic RIF-susceptible cases. Sequencing of the 6 discrepant samples resolved 3 of them, resulting in an increased specificity of 98%. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that the Xpert test also shows good potential for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary TB and that its ease of use makes it applicable for countries where TB is endemic.     

First evaluation of an improved assay for molecular genetic detection of tuberculosis as well as rifampin and isoniazid resistances

The commercially available line probe assay MTBDRplus 2.0 (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) was evaluated for its ability to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and mutations conferring resistance to rifampin (RMP) and isoniazid (INH) directly in smear-negative and smear-positive pulmonary clinical specimens under routine laboratory conditions. A total of 348 samples originating from Moldova, a high-incidence country for tuberculosis (TB), were investigated. Two hundred fifty-seven (73.9%) were smear negative, 12 samples were excluded, and 81 (23.3%) were smear positive. Two DNA extraction methods were applied. Compared to culture and clinical data as the reference standard (adapted from Vadwai V et al., J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:2540-2545, 2011), overall sensitivity and specificity were 87.6 and 99.2%, respectively. One hundred four of the 257 smear-negative samples turned out to be culture positive, and 20 were MTBC culture negative but were positive based on clinical symptoms. The combined sensitivity and specificity in the subgroup of smear-negative samples were calculated to be 79.8 and 99.2%, respectively. MTBDRplus 2.0 detected RMP and INH resistance with sensitivity and specificity of 94.3 and 96.0%, respectively. In conclusion, the MTBDRplus 2.0 assay is a rapid and highly sensitive test for the detection of M. tuberculosis strains from smear-positive and -negative clinical specimens and provides additional information on RMP and INH resistance status, which can easily be included in routine laboratory work flow.     

Predictors of pneumocystosis or tuberculosis in HIV-infected Asian patients with AFB smear-negative sputum pneumonia

OBJECTIVES: To identify predictors of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP) or pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in acid-fast bacillus smear-negative HIV-infected patients and to develop clinical prediction rules. DESIGN: A cohort study conducted in consecutive hospitalized Asian patients. METHODS: Multivariate analyses were performed on the Cambodian sample to determine clinical, radiological, and biological predictors of PCP or TB at hospital admission. The Vietnamese sample was kept for independent validation. RESULTS: In Cambodia, the gold standard technique for TB and PCP were fulfilled in 172 (27 cases) and 160 (84 cases) patients, respectively. For TB, independent predictors included the following: headache [odds ratio (OR) 3.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 8.6], localized radiological opacity (OR 5.8; 95% CI 1.9-17.9), and mediastinal adenopathy (OR 10.1; 95% CI 3.5 to 29.0); and for PCP: resting oxygen saturation <90% (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.3 to 8.5 for resting arterial oxygen saturation >or=80%; and OR 9.1; 95% CI 1.8 to 44.5 for resting arterial oxygen saturation <80%), trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole prophylaxis (OR 0.1; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.6), and diffuse radiological shadowing (OR 7.0; 95% CI 2.7 to 18.6). PCP risk predicted by a score based on these 3 factors ranged from 3% to 92% (Cambodia). When tested on Vietnamese patients (n = 69, 38 with PCP), the score maintained correct predictive ability (c-index = 0.72) but with poor calibration. CONCLUSIONS: The PCP score could provide a useful clinical tool to identify PCP among acid-fast bacillus smear-negative pneumonia and start specific therapy.     

Multicenter Study of a Commercial, Automated Polymerase Chain Reaction System for the Rapid Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Respiratory Specimens in Routine Clinical Practice

A cooperative study was conducted among six laboratories to compare the performance of the Cobas Amplicor (CA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system (Roche Molecular Systems, USA) for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with that of microscopy and culture in routine clinical laboratory diagnosis. A total of 5,221 decontaminated respiratory specimens were tested. The use of an internal control allowed detection of PCR inhibition in 144 (2.8%) specimens. Only two culture-positive samples were CA PCR inhibitory and therefore could not be detected by PCR testing. Of the 333 culture-positive specimens, 278 (83.5%) were positive by the CA PCR. Of the 4,744 culture-negative specimens, 52 (1.1%) were positive by the CA PCR. After analysis of discrepancies, 40 of the 52 culture-negative, CA PCR-positive specimens were classified as true positive. Thus, the overall sensitivities of culture, CA PCR and microscopy were 89.3%, 85.2% and 55.5%, respectively. The overall specificity of the CA PCR was 99.7%. Five of the six centers found similar performances for the CA PCR, with sensitivities ranging from 85.7 to 90.9%. The CA PCR was more sensitive for smear-positive samples, exhibiting overall sensitivities of 96.1% and 71.7% for smear-positive and smear-negative specimens, respectively. These results indicate that the Cobas Amplicor system enables microbiology laboratories with reasonable previous experience in molecular biology testing to perform PCR and to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in more than 70% of specimens obtained from infected patients.     

Evaluation of Two Line Probe Assays for Rapid Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,Tuberculosis (TB) Drug Resistance,and Non-TB Mycobacteria in HIV-Infected Individuals with Suspected TB

Limited performance data from line probe assays (LPAs), nucleic acid tests used for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB), nontuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance are available for HIV-infected individuals, in whom paucibacillary TB is common. In this study, the strategy of testing sputum with GenoType MTBDRplus (MTBDR-Plus) and GenoType Direct LPA (Direct LPA) was compared to a gold standard of one mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) liquid culture. HIV-positive (HIV⁺) individuals with suspected TB from southern Africa and South America with <7 days of TB treatment had 1 sputum specimen tested with Direct LPA, MTBDR-Plus LPA, smear microscopy, MGIT, biochemical identification of mycobacterial species, and culture-based drug-susceptibility testing (DST). Of 639 participants, 59.3% were MGIT M. tuberculosis culture positive, of which 276 (72.8%) were acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear positive. MTBDR-Plus had a sensitivity of 81.0% and a specificity of 100%, with sensitivities of 44.1% in AFB smear-negative versus 94.6% in AFB smear-positive specimens. For specimens that were positive for M. tuberculosis by MTBDR-Plus, the sensitivity and specificity for rifampin resistance were 91.7% and 96.6%, respectively, and for isoniazid (INH) they were 70.6% and 99.1%. The Direct LPA had a sensitivity of 88.4% and a specificity of 94.6% for M. tuberculosis detection, with a sensitivity of 72.5% in smear-negative specimens. Ten of 639 MGIT cultures grew Mycobacterium avium complex or Mycobacterium kansasii, half of which were detected by Direct LPA. Both LPA assays performed well in specimens from HIV-infected individuals, including in AFB smear-negative specimens, with 72.5% sensitivity for M. tuberculosis identification with the Direct LPA and 44.1% sensitivity with MTBDR-Plus. LPAs have a continued role for use in settings where rapid identification of INH resistance and clinically relevant NTM are priorities.     

Laboratory Implementation of the Polymerase Chain Reaction for Confirmation of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

 Decision analysis methods were used to compare four mycobacteriology laboratory strategies with respect to time to confirmation and exclusion of smear-positive and smear-negative cases of pulmonary tuberculosis. Strategies assessed included the following: (i) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on all respiratory specimens; (ii) PCR on smear-positive specimens and on the broth of vials for other specimens attaining a growth index >10 in a radiometric culture detection system; (iii) PCR on smear-positive specimens only; and (iv) radiometric culture detection, with DNA probe for species identification of vials attaining a growth index >999. Strategies i and ii had predicted average times to confirm cases of 5 and 7.6 days, respectively, and remained within 3 days of each other over a broad range of PCR performance with smear-negative specimens. In contrast, case confirmation times using strategies iii and iv were 10.4 and 15.3 days, respectively. Only 10% of specimens were processed by PCR in strategy ii. Times to confirm smear-negative cases were comparable for strategies i and ii when PCR sensitivity was <40% with these specimens. Times to exclude pulmonary tuberculosis were similar for all strategies. Given the current suboptimal performance of PCR with smear-negative specimens, strategy ii offers accelerated case confirmation with limited PCR usage.     

Experimental platform utilising melting curve technology for detection of mutations in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Mycobacterium tuberculosis</Emphasis> isolates

Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the most deadly infections with approximately a quarter of cases not being identified and/or treated mainly due to a lack of resources. Rapid detection of TB or drug-resistant TB enables timely adequate treatment and is a cornerstone of effective TB management. We evaluated the analytical performance of a single-tube assay for multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) on an experimental platform utilising RT-PCR and melting curve analysis that could potentially be operated as a point-of-care (PoC) test in resource-constrained settings with a high burden of TB. Firstly, we developed and evaluated the prototype MDR-TB assay using specimens extracted from well-characterised TB isolates with a variety of distinct rifampicin and isoniazid resistance conferring mutations and nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) strains. Secondly, we validated the experimental platform using 98 clinical sputum samples from pulmonary TB patients collected in high MDR-TB settings. The sensitivity of the platform for TB detection in clinical specimens was 75% for smear-negative and 92.6% for smear-positive sputum samples. The sensitivity of detection for rifampicin and isoniazid resistance was 88.9 and 96.0% and specificity was 87.5 and 100%, respectively. Observed limitations in sensitivity and specificity could be resolved by adjusting the sample preparation methodology and melting curve recognition algorithm. Overall technology could be considered a promising PoC methodology especially in resource-constrained settings based on its combined accuracy, convenience, simplicity, speed, and cost characteristics.     

International standards for tuberculosis care: relevance and implications for laboratory professionals

On World Tuberculosis (TB) Day 2006, the International Standards for Tuberculosis Care (ISTC) was officially released and widely endorsed by several agencies and organizations. The ISTC release was the culmination of a year long global effort to develop and set internationally acceptable, evidence-based standards for tuberculosis care. The ISTC describes a widely endorsed level of care that all practitioners, public and private, should seek to achieve in managing individuals who have or are suspected of having, TB and is intended to facilitate the effective engagement of all healthcare providers in delivering high quality care for patients of all ages, including those with smear-positive, smear-negative and extra-pulmonary TB, TB caused by drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis and TB/HIV coinfection. In this article, we present the ISTC, with a special focus on the diagnostic standards and describe their implications and relevance for laboratory professionals in India and worldwide. Laboratory professionals play a critical role in ensuring that all the standards are actually met by providing high quality laboratory services for smear microscopy, culture and drug susceptibility testing and other services such as testing for HIV infection. In fact, if the ISTC is widely followed, it can be expected that there will be a greater need and demand for quality assured laboratory services and this will have obvious implications for all laboratories in terms of work load, requirement for resources and trained personnel and organization of quality assurance systems.     

Molecular techniques in mycobacterial detection

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical utility of the commercial nucleic acid amplification (NAA) tests (ie, Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test, Gen-Probe, Inc and AMPLICOR Mycobacterium tuberculosis Test, Roche Molecular Systems, Inc) for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. DATA SOURCES: Review of the English-language literature. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of both NAA tests is excellent (sensitivity, > or = 95%; specificity, 100%) when testing respiratory specimens that are smear-positive for acid-fast bacilli (AFB). Only the Gen-Probe assay is approved for testing respiratory specimens regardless of the AFB smear result. Data from 3 studies showed that the sensitivity of the Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test in smear-negative patients ranged from 83% to 85%, and that the specificity was 99%. Both NAA tests have been used to test nonrespiratory specimens; in some studies, the performance was comparable to the performance obtained for respiratory specimens, whereas in others, it was lower. The NAA tests also appear to be reliable tools for rapid detection of M tuberculosis complex in positive broth cultures of all specimen types (except blood). The impact of the NAA tests on patient outcome varies based on the result of the AFB smear. In smear-positive patients, public health and hospital infection-control resources are predominantly affected. The potential for influencing patient outcome is much greater when the AFB smear is negative. In smear-negative patients, the NAA test could provide more rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and subsequent initiation of therapy; eliminate the need for invasive diagnostic procedures, which are both costly and pose an added risk to the patient; and allow earlier discharge of hospitalized patients. Prospective studies concerning the cost-effectiveness of the NAA tests are needed.     

Nucleic acid testing by public health referral laboratories for public health laboratories using the U.S. HIV diagnostic testing algorithm

BackgroundMany public health laboratories adopting the U.S. HIV laboratory testing algorithm do not have a nucleic acid test (NAT), which is needed when the third- or fourth-generation HIV screening immunoassay is reactive and the antibody-based supplemental test is non-reactive or indeterminate.ObjectivesAmong public health laboratories utilizing public health referral laboratories for NAT conducted as part of the algorithm, we evaluated the percentage of screening immunoassays needing NAT, the number of specimens not meeting APTIMA (NAT) specifications, time to APTIMA result, the proportion of acute infections (i.e., reactive APTIMA) among total infections, and screening immunoassay specificity.Study designFrom August 2012 to April 2013, 22 laboratories enrolled to receive free APTIMA (NAT) at New York or Florida public health referral laboratories. Data were analyzed for testing conducted until June 2013.ResultsSubmitting laboratories conducted a median of 4778 screening immunoassays; 0–1.3% (median 0.2%) needed NAT. Of 140 specimens received, 9 (6.4%) did not meet NAT specifications. The median time from specimen collection to reporting the 11 reactive NAT results was ten days, including six days from receipt in the submitting laboratory to shipment to the referral laboratory. Acute infections ranged from 0 to 12.5% (median 0%) of total infections. Third- and fourth-generation immunoassays met package insert specificity values.ConclusionsPublic health referral laboratories provide a feasible option for conducting NAT. Reducing the time from specimen collection to submission of specimens for NAT is an important step toward maximizing the public health impact of identifying acute infections.     

Levels of Circulating Immune Complexes Containing Mycobacterium Tuberculosis-specific Antigens in Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Sarcoidosis Patients

The present study was conducted to understand the aetiological link between tuberculosis (TB) and sarcoidosis. Sera from smear-positive TB subjects (n = 24), smear-negative TB subjects (n = 24), sarcoidosis patients (n = 24) and healthy controls (n = 24) were collected and circulating immune complexes were isolated. Sandwich ELISA was performed for detecting four highly specific mycobacterial regions of difference (RD) proteins (early secretory antigenic target 6 [ESAT6], 10 KDa culture filtrate protein [CFP10], 21 KDa CFP [CFP21] and mycobacterial protein from species TB [MPT 64]). Sensitivity and specificity was calculated, and receiver operating characteristic plots were plotted. Non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test was used to calculate statistical significance. Seventy per cent of sarcoidosis patients showed the presence of immune complexes of mycobacterial RD proteins similar to that observed in the sera of smear-negative TB patients as opposed to antibody-based detection assay based on these RD proteins. Thus, immunoassays based on specific mycobacterial RD proteins also need to be developed and validated carefully to differentiate TB and sarcoidosis, a close mimic of smear-negative tuberculosis.     

Clinical evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET system for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The performance of the BDProbeTec ET system (BD Biosciences, Sparks, Md.) for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) in respiratory specimens was evaluated by comparing results to those of conventional mycobacterial culture performed with the BACTEC 460 TB system and Middlebrook 7H11 biplates. Patients known to have been on antituberculous therapy were excluded from the analysis. Of 600 evaluable specimens (4 specimens were excluded from the analysis due to failure of the internal amplification control [IAC]) from 332 patients, 57 grew mycobacteria; 16 were MTBC (from 12 patients), and 41 were nontuberculous mycobacteria. Of the 16 MTBC culture-positive specimens, 12 were smear positive and 4 were smear negative. BDProbeTec ET detected 14 of the 16 MTBC culture-positive specimens, resulting in initial overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 87.5, 99.0, 70.0, and 99.7%, respectively. After resolution of discrepancies by review of medical records and retesting of samples yielding discordant MTBC culture and BDProbeTec ET results, the revised overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the BDProbeTec ET were respectively 93.8, 99.8, 93.8, and 99.8% by specimen and 91.7, 99.7, 91.7, and 99.7% by patient. The BDProbeTec ET System offers the distinct advantage of including an IAC in the specimen well. These data suggest that the test performance is very good, especially for smear-positive samples. However, the number of patients with tuberculosis in our study, especially those with smear-negative disease, was small; therefore, additional studies are needed.     

Rapid diagnosis of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis by use of a reverse line blot hybridization assay

Drug resistance in tuberculosis (TB) is a matter of grave concern for TB control programs, as there is currently no cure for some extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains. There is concern that this resistance could transmit, stressing the need for additional control measures, rapid diagnostic methods, and newer drugs for treatment. We developed an in-house assay that can rapidly detect resistance to drugs involved in the definition of XDR-TB directly from smear-positive specimens. Two hundred fifteen phenotypically XDR-TB isolates and 50 pansusceptible isolates were analyzed using a reverse line blot hybridization (RLBH) assay. The assay was also successfully applied to 73 smear-positive clinical specimens. The RLBH assay exhibited good sensitivity for the detection of resistance to isoniazid (99%), rifampin (99%), fluoroquinolones (95.3%), and second-line aminoglycosides (94.8%). The results from application of this assay on direct smear-positive clinical specimens revealed 93% concordance with the phenotypic drug susceptibility test (DST) results for the above-mentioned drugs. The time to accurate DST results was significantly reduced from weeks to 3 days. This molecular assay is a highly accurate tool for screening for XDR-TB, which achieves a substantial reduction in diagnostic delays.