大学生心理咨询倾向性问卷的编制

目的编制大学生心理咨询倾向性问卷。方法在查阅文献和前期访谈基础上编制问卷。进行3次大一学生的整群抽样,第一次调查315名大一学生用于初步项目分析和因素探索;第二次调查584名大一学生用于探索性因素分析和问卷信、效度检测;第三次调查101名大一学生用于验证性因素分析,以专业心理求助态度量表为效标,并进行重测。结果大学生心理咨询倾向性问卷共19个题目,包括心理咨询偏见、心理咨询信任、非专业心理求助途径、心理咨询污名4个因子。验证性因素分析表明所得模型拟合度可接受(χ2/df =2.677,GFI=0.932,AGFI=0.912,CFI=0.916,NFI=0.874,RMSEA=0.054)。总问卷内部一致性系数总量表为0.878,各因子α为0.685~0.845;总量表重测信度为0.885,4个因子重测信度为0.693~0.836。结论本研究编制的问卷具有较好的信度和效度,可用于评估大学生心理咨询倾向性。     

消防员社会支持问卷的编制

目的编制适用于研究我国消防员社会支持的问卷。方法参考已有文献和量表、若干消防员以及专家的意见编制初步问卷;之后进行施测、项目分析、筛选题目、探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析,信度和效度检验。结果消防员社会支持问卷由组织支持、战友支持、家庭支持、社会支持4个维度构成;量表的模型拟合良好(χ2/df=1.359,RMSEA=0.044,CFI=0.956,GFI=0.892);总量表的内部一致性系数为0.898,4个维度的α系数在0.623~0.864之间,分半信度为0.882。结论本研究编制的消防员社会支持问卷具有良好的信效度,适用于消防官兵的社会支持研究。     

社区融入问卷中文版在残疾人中的信效度检验

目的检验社区融入问卷中文版在残疾人中的信效度。方法使用社区融入问卷中文版对162名残疾人和206名普通大学生进行集体施测。选取世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第2版作为校标效度指标。4周后随机抽取50名残疾人进行重测。使用SPSS 16.0和Lisrel 8.70统计软件进行数据分析。结果在删除条目6之后,验证性因素分析显示三因素模型拟合较好(χ~2/df=1.87,RMSEA=0.077,NNFI=0.93,GFI=0.91,CFI=0.95);该问卷得分与校标量表总分呈显著负相关;该问卷总的内部一致性系数为0.80;总的重测信度为0.92;残疾人的问卷得分显著高于大学生。结论社区融入问卷中文版具有较好的信效度,可以作为残疾人参与的测量工具。     

医护人员应对方式问卷编制及评价

目的 编制医护人员应对方式问卷,并检验其信效度.方法 依据应对理论,采用访谈和开放式问卷等方法收集条目,于2011年从安徽省4所综合性医院抽取2个样本,样本1(n =286)用于项目分析和探索性因素分析,确定问卷的项目和维度;样本2(n =392)用于进行验证性因素分析和考察问卷的信度和效度;以特质应对方式问卷为效标,检验效标效度.结果 问卷共25个条目,由3个维度构成,分别是回避应对、情绪应对、问题解决;结构方程模型各拟合指数良好:x2/df=2.575、NFI=0.849、CFI=0.902、RMSEA=0.067;量表总分与特质应对方式问卷总分呈正相关(r =0.364,P＜0.001);总量表和各维度Coronach's α系数分别为0.815、0.836、0.753、0.758.结论 医护人员应对方式问卷具有良好的信度和效度,能够作为调查医护人员压力应对方式的有效工具.     

中文版Olweus欺负问卷同胞欺负信效度评价

目的对中文版Olweus欺负问卷(OBVQ)进行修订形成Olweus欺负问卷(同胞版)并评价其信度和效度,为我国儿童青少年同胞欺负的现况分析提供调查工具。方法利用分层整群抽样法选取湖南省1 559名8～18岁的儿童青少年,采用OBVQ(同胞版)、青少年侵害问卷(JVQ)调查其同胞欺负行为的发生情况。通过分析结构效度、效标效度、分半信度、重测信度和内部一致性信度对OBVQ(同胞版)进行信度和效度评价。结果 OBVQ(同胞版)的12个条目与所在维度的相关系数为0.425～0.697(P 0.001),表明量表项目区分度较好。验证因子分析GFI=0.911,RMSEA=0.103,说明量表结构效度良好。OBVQ(同胞版)受欺负维度得分与JVQ受同胞欺负维度相关系数为0.453(P 0.001),提示量表效标效度较好。总量表、受欺负维度和欺负维度的内部一致性信度Cronbach′sα系数分别为0.832、0.764和0.777;分半信度分别为0.675、0.729和0.761;重测信度分别为0.841、0.867和0.891,说明量表的信度良好。结论 Olweus欺负问卷(同胞版)的信度和效度评价结果较为理想,可用于调查我国儿童青少年同胞欺负的发生情况。     

体育教练员应对方式量表的初步编制

目的编制适用于我国体育教练员群体的应对方式量表。方法基于文献理论、半结构式问卷调查与访谈,编制量表题项。随后对224名被试者进行预测试,进行项目分析,形成初始问卷。最后对437名被试者做探索性因素分析,对523名被试者做验证性因素分析,并做信度检验。结果问卷包含17个题项,分属解决问题、发泄、超越应对和回避4个维度,方差累积贡献率为66.748%,总量表克伦巴赫α系数为0.836,分量表克伦巴赫α系数在0.724~0.813之间。验证性因素分析表明,量表结构良好,其中χ2/df为1.824,GFI、AFI、AGFI均大于0.9,RMSEA为0.047。结论量表信、效度良好,可以用于我国体育教练员群体的测量评价。     

大学生自我决定问卷结构及信效度分析

目的 探讨大学生自我决定的心理结构并在此基础上编制问卷,为针对相关人群的相关研究提供工具.方法 通过访谈和开放式问卷等方法,编制大学生自我决定问卷,对其进行探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析,并进行信效度检验.结果 探索性因素分析结果显示,大学生自我决定包含支持感、关系感、计划性、自主感、胜任感和坚持性6个维度;验证性因素分析结果显示,问卷的RMSEA值小于0.05,GFI,AGFI,IFI,TLI和CFI值均＞0.9,内部一致性系数分布在0.673 ～0.905之间.结论 大学生自我决定问卷结构明晰,信效度都达到了测量学指标.     

SF-12量表用于城市建筑业农民工生存质量的信度和效度研究

目的分析SF-12量表用于评价城市建筑业农民工人群生存质量的信度和效度。方法采用内部一致性信度评估SF-12量表的信度,采用集合效度、区分效度和结构效度评估SF-12量表的效度。结果SF-12量表评价城市建筑业农民工人群的内部一致性信度Cronbach’s α系数为0.776,8个维度的集合效度定标试验成功率为100%,区分效度定标试验成功率为100%;对量表的理论模型进行验证性因子分析,所得模型与原始假定一致,拟合指标结果为RMSEA=0.052,NFI=0.973,CFI=0.982,AGFI=0.964。结论SF-12量表适用于城市建筑业农民工群体的生存质量评价。     

免费医学生职业认同问卷的编制与信效度检验

目的 编制免费医学生职业认同问卷。方法 在查阅文献、前期访谈基础上编制调查问卷。进行2次方便取样,第一次调查380名免费医学生用于初步项目分析、探索性因素分析和问卷信、效度检测。第二次调查49名免费医学生用于验证性因素分析,以大学生专业承诺量表为效标,并进行重测。结果 形成的问卷共19个题目,包括价值认同、行为认同、专业认同、环境认同和态度认同5个因子。验证性因素分析表明所得模型拟合度可接受（〖XC小五号.EPS;P〗/df=2.291,GFI=0.922,AGFI=0.896,CFI=0.903,NFI=0.843,RMSEA=0.058）,总问卷内部一致性系数为总量表为0.841,各因子α为0.619-0.788;总量表重测信度为0.787,各因子重测信度为0.684-0.758。结论 量表具有较好的信、效度。     

医学生二维满意度量表研制及信效度分析

目的 采用心理测量学方法对医学生二维满意度量表(MCSTDSQ)进行评估,以期对量表进行改进和完善.方法 通过对分层抽取的1 240名学生的问卷数据进行分析,评价量表的内部一致性、结构效度、聚集效度和区分效度.结果 方根法计算服务与保障、专业知识、个人发展、教务管理、学生管理的权重分别为0.069,0.177,0.334,0.167,0,253;内部一致性Cronbach＇sα系数为0.923,各因素Cronbach＇s α系数均大于0.7.经因子分析,因子负荷和结构与量表内容吻合,结构效度和内容效度较好.因素内相关性强于因素间相关性,较好地支持聚集和区分效度.结论 MCSTDSQ的心理测量学评价令人满意,可以在医学院校工作中采用和推广.     

《大学生预防艾滋病知识与能力》调查问卷信度与效度分析

目的评价自行设计《大学生预防艾滋病知识与能力》调查问卷的信度和效度。方法随机选择天津外国语学院205名大学生作为调查对象,并对同一人群进行2次问卷调查,计算该问卷的内部一致性、重测信度和结构效度。结果该问卷的6个模块中,大部分模块Cronbach’s系数>0.6,70%的题目重测一致率在0.7或Spearman等级相关系数>0.4。结构效度较好,11个公因子可解释问卷全部内容的60%。结论该问卷的信度和效度较好,可用于评价大学生预防艾滋病知识与能力水平。     

《女大学生生殖健康知信行调查问卷》信度与效度评价

目的编制一套关于女大学生生殖健康知信行的初步调查问卷,并评价其信度和效度。方法采用自编问卷对青海大学507名在校女生进行调查;采用Cronbach’s系数评价问卷的内部一致性信度,采用SpearmanBrown公式计算半折信度,采用两次测量结果的相关系数来评价重测信度;采用各维度和问卷总分之间的相关性来评价区分效度,采用证实性因子分析来评价问卷的结构效度。结果总体Cronbach’s系数为0.814,生殖健康相关知识、开展生殖健康教育的态度、性观念、性和性意外行为、学习生殖健康知识行为这5个维度的Cronbach’s系数分别为0.716,0.874,0.719,0.548,0.562;问卷总体和5个维度的半折信度分别为0.767,0.701,0.886,0.719,0.522,0.558;问卷总体重测信度为0.733,各维度的重测信度分别为0.565,0.921,0.731,1.000,0.494(P<0.05);五个维度之间呈中度相关,相关系数在0.431~0.656之间(P<0.05),五个维度和问卷总体的相关系数分别为0.710,0.739,0.742,0.801,0.689,除最后一个维度外均呈强相关(P<0.05);因子分析共提取7个公因子,可解释问卷总体的56.171%,各条的目共同度在0.429~0.737之间。结论该问卷的信度效度较好,改进部分信度效度较低的维度后,可以作为女大学生生殖健康方面调查的可靠工具。     

初中生心理资本的问卷编制

目的 编制初中生心理资本问卷,为评估初中生心理资本提供测量工具。方法 在文献综述、结构式访谈并结合开放式问卷的基础上,通过对603名初中生的探索性因子分析和594名初中生的验证性因子分析形成最终问卷。结果 问卷由自控力、宽容、希望、自信、乐观五因子22题项构成;问卷具有良好的内容效度、结构效度与校标效度;五因子的内部一致性系数在0.653～0.804间,总问卷的α系数为0.857;五因子的重测信度在0.730～0.856间,总问卷的重测信度为0.917。结论 初步编制的问卷各项测量学指标总体表现良好,可以作为测量初中生心理资本的工具。     

Psychometric properties of Turkish version of Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ). A preliminary results

The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ) among Turkish university students. The questionnaire was administered to 508 participants. Construct validity was assessed by principal component factor analysis with varimax rotation and reliability was tested by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. For testing criterion related validity, EAT-40 with DEBQ was also administered to 508 participants. Results showed the presence of three major factors (emotional eating, restrained eating and external eating) with loadings similar to those of the original questionnaire. Three subscales of DEBQ had higher internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The obtained correlation between EAT-40 and DEBQ was ranged from 0.12 to 0.39. This study clearly demonstrates the factorial validity and the reliability of a Turkish version of the DEBQ.     

Validation of a Spanish-Language Questionnaire on Adolescent Eating Behavior Based on Social Cognitive Theory

ObjectiveTo validate a Spanish-language questionnaire on adolescent eating behavior based on Social Cognitive Theory.DesignThe validity (reliability and construct validity) of a self-administered questionnaire containing 28 questions with Likert scale–type response options was evaluated.SettingSchool located in Tonala, Jalisco, Mexico (a peri-urban area) with approximately 1,400 students enrolled.ParticipantsOne hundred fifty-two adolescents enrolled in the second year of a middle school in Tonalá, Jalisco, Mexico (mean age, 13.7 years; SD, 0.5 years; 64% female). The retest was completed by 70 adolescents chosen at random.Outcome Measures and AnalysisThe questionnaire's reliability was measured through internal consistency (Cronbach α) and reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]). Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis.ResultsFive questions were eliminated from the questionnaire because of a lack of temporal stability (ICC ≤0.4). The exploratory factor analysis was satisfactory for 3 factors (41.89% of variance): environmental facilitators and social support, self-efficacy and self-regulation, and outcome expectations and outcome expectations value. The questionnaire had good internal consistency (α = 0.824) and excellent temporal stability (ICC = 0.849).Conclusions and ImplicationsThe results substantiate the reliability and construct validity of this questionnaire. The questionnaire has the potential to use the assessment of Social Cognitive Theory constructs in clinical practice or in nutrition interventions aimed at modifying the eating habits of Spanish-speaking adolescents.     

青少年日常烦恼问卷修订版的信效度检验

目的 对青少年日常烦恼问卷修订版进行信效度检验,为研究青少年日常烦恼提供可靠有效的测量工具。方法 对Chan,Poon和Tang(2016)编制的日常烦恼问卷进行翻译,并邀请专家审查和评定。抽取云南昆明市的466名初一、初二、高一、高二的学生为被试,对日常烦恼问卷修订版的结构效度、效标关联效度和内部一致性信度进行评估。结果 青少年日常烦恼问卷修订版包括学习、在学校的人际关系、家庭生活和放学后的活动4个维度,共13个题目。日常烦恼问卷的四因子结构与实际数据相契合,其拟合指数分别为χ2 = 130.80、v = 59、RMSEA = 0.05、GFI = 0.96、AGFI = 0.94、NFI = 0.89、CFI = 0.94。日常烦恼问卷总分及4个维度得分与问题行为得分呈正相关。总量表的内部一致性Cronbach α系数为0.72,4个维度的α系数为0.71、0.82、0.77、0.87,2个月后总量表的重测信度为0.63。结论 日常烦恼问卷修订版具有良好的信效度,是测量青少年日常烦恼的适宜工具。     

青少年多领域冒险行为问卷和风险感知问卷的编制及应用

目的 根据冒险的领域特殊性理论编制含有多个领域的青少年冒险行为问卷和风险感知问卷,为全面地评估青少年冒险行为和风险感知提供工具.方法 以银川市426名中学生为问卷的初测试对象,回收有效问卷422份,再以宁夏和安徽省(区)2402名中学生为正式测试对象进行青少年冒险行为问卷和风险感知问卷的测试.结果 探索性因素分析显示两问卷都包括社会、娱乐、安全、道德四个领域,33个项目,贡献率分别是41.25%和45.5%,分半信度分别是0.848和0.890,内部一致性信度分别是0.900和0.938.验证性因素分析各项拟合指数分别为:x2/df=8.36和6.73,RMSEA=0.066和0.054,NFI=0.97和0.97,CFI=0.97和0.97.青少年冒险行为和风险感知存在性别差异,F(1,2288)=56.256,P<0.001,F(1,2288)=10.766,P=0.05;冒险行为随年龄逐步增多,F(2,2288)=140.067,P<0.001,而风险感知则逐渐减小,F(2,2288)=54.900,P<0.001.青少年在社会领域的冒险最为突出,随后依次是娱乐、道德、安全领域.结论 青少年多领域冒险行为问卷和风险感知问卷信、效度良好,可以作为考查青少年冒险行为和风险感知的工具.

Abstract：

Objective According to the Domain Specific Theory (DST) in risk-taking, this study intended to construct adolescent risk-taking behavior questionnaire and risk perception questionnaire inferred many domains for studying the adolescent risk-taking behavior and risk perception. Methods With 422 middle school students in Yinchuan as subjects to develop the questionnaire. 2402 middle school students in Ningxia and Anhui were surveyed using the questionnaire. Results Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) indicated that both of the questionnaires contain four domains named society, recreation, safe and moral, and 33 items, which could explain 41.25% and 45.5% of the total variance respectively. The split-half reliability were 0.848, 0.890 and the coefficient of internal consistency were 0.900 and 0.938. The fit indices of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were as follows: x2/df=8.36 and 6.73, RMSEA=0.066 and 0.054, NFI=0.97 and 0.97, CFI=0.97 and 0.97 separately. Gender difference in adolescent risk-taking behavior and risk perception were noticed, with F(1, 2288) =56.256, P<0.001 ,F(1, 2288) =10.766, P=0.05. The adolescent risk-taking behaviors increased with age, F(2, 2288) =140.067, P<0.001, while the risk perception decreased with age, F{2,2288) =54.900,P<0.001. Adolescent on the highest score was in the social risk, followed by recreation, morality and safety. Conclusion Our results showed the newly developed scales were reliable and valid enough to be applicable to measure the adolescent risk-taking behavior and risk perception.     

Cellular phone dependence tendency of female university students

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of a cellular phone dependence questionnaire (CPDQ) we designed. METHODS: The CPDQ, a 20-item self-rated scale, was given to 168 healthy female university students (mean age, 21.7 years). Each question uses a 0 to 3 response scale; a higher score indicates greater dependence. The reliability and validity of the CPDQ were assessed by an internal consistency estimate and a factor analysis, respectively. Question scores were then summed to provide a cellular phone dependence score ranging from 0 to 60. RESULTS: The reliability coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) for the CPDQ was 0.86. In addition, six significant factors were extracted by factor analysis for the 20 items of the CPDQ. The cellular phone dependence score showed a normal distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov's test), and the average (+/- SD) was 33.2 +/- 8.7. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the CPDQ is a useful scale for rating cellular phone dependence.     

Development and Validation of a Diabetes Questionnaire for Middle School Students

ObjectiveTo develop and validate a questionnaire to assess diabetes knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and intent to change among middle school students.DesignA cross-sectional validation analysis.SettingStudents in 3 urban middle schools in Utah participated in this study.ParticipantsThe 25-item questionnaire was validated in independent samples of 277 and 304 students in the seventh and eighth grades.Variables MeasuredThe questionnaire includes the following variables: diabetes knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and intent to change dietary and physical activity behaviors.AnalysisRigorous statistical approaches, including Cronbach's α (goodness of fit) calculation, test-retest reliability, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, were employed to examine the reliability and construct validity.ResultsThe Cronbach's α coefficients were 0.7 for both subscales demonstrating acceptable internal consistency. All factor loadings were > 0.4, revealing close relations between factors and items. The confirmatory factor analysis model fit was 0.9 for the comparative fit index and Tucker-Lewis Index, indicating a reasonable model-data fit.Conclusions and ImplicationsThis study demonstrated the validity of a diabetes questionnaire for middle school students. Future work is needed to validate its use in a diabetes prevention program, given the growing need for diabetes education among young adolescents.