共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Bleecker Marquette Allan A. Twichell Charles S. Ascher Rollo H. Britten Alfred L. Burgdorf F. Stuart Chapin Henry S. Churchill Paul B. Cornelly Charles V. Craster Harold J. Dillehay Myron D. Downs Clarence W. Farrier Alfred H. Fletcher L. M. Graves B. M. Pettit Huntington Williams 《American journal of public health》1947,37(3):303-306
2.
3.
Anthony G. Munton Teresa Blackburn Sofka Barreau 《Early child development and care》2002,172(3):223-230
This review looks at empirical evidence concerning good practice in the provision of out of school childcare. English language journals were searched for relevant research from both the UK and other countries. Our aim was to seek out evidence concerning good practice in the care of school-aged children. Results suggest quality in out of school provision is linked to three factors: staff training, programme structure, and appropriate adult-child ratios and group sizes. 相似文献
4.
《Early child development and care》2012,182(3):223-230
This review looks at empirical evidence concerning good practice in the provision of out of school childcare. English language journals were searched for relevant research from both the UK and other countries. Our aim was to seek out evidence concerning good practice in the care of school-aged children. Results suggest quality in out of school provision is linked to three factors: staff training, programme structure, and appropriate adult-child ratios and group sizes. 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Practical implementation of notions such as patient-orientation, client-centredness, and demand-driven care is far from straightforward
in care and service supply to elderly clients living independently. This paper aims to provide preliminary insights into how
it is possible to bridge the gap between policy intent, which reflects an increasing client orientation, and actual practice
of care and service provision. Differences in personal objectives and characteristics generate different sets of needs among
elderly clients that must have an appropriate response in the daily routines of care and service providers. From a study of
the available literature and by conceptual reasoning, we identify several important operational implications of client-oriented
care and service provision. To deal with these implications the authors turn to the field of operations management. This field
has deepened the understanding of translating an organisation’s policy into daily activities and working methods. More specifically,
we elaborate on the concept of modularity, which stems from the field of operations management. With respect to elderly people
who live independently, this concept, among others, seems to be particularly useful in providing options and variation in
individual care and service packages. Based on our line of reasoning, we propose that modularity provides possibilities to
enhance the provision of demand-based care and services. Furthermore, our findings offer direction on how organisations in
housing, welfare and care can be guided in translating demand-based care to their operational processes. 相似文献
14.
15.
Jennifer Northridge Olivia F. Ramirez Jeanette A. Stingone Luz Claudio 《Journal of urban health》2010,87(2):211-224
The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between type and quality of housing and childhood asthma in an urban community with a wide gradient of racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and housing characteristics. A parent-report questionnaire was distributed in 26 randomly selected New York City public elementary schools. Type of housing was categorized using the participants’ addresses and the Building Information System, a publicly-accessible database from the New York City Department of Buildings. Type of housing was associated with childhood asthma with the highest prevalence of asthma found in public housing (21.8%). Residents of all types of private housing had lower odds of asthma than children living in public housing. After adjusting for individual- and community-level demographic and economic factors, the relationship between housing type and childhood asthma persisted, with residents of private family homes having the lowest odds of current asthma when compared to residents of public housing (odds ratio: 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.22, 1.21). Factors associated with housing quality explain some of the clustering of asthma in public housing. For example, the majority (68.7%) of public housing residents reported the presence of cockroaches, compared to 21% of residents of private houses. Reported cockroaches, rats, and water leaks were also independently associated with current asthma. These findings suggest differential exposure and asthma risk by urban housing type. Interventions aimed at reducing these disparities should consider multiple aspects of the home environment, especially those that are not directly controlled by residents. 相似文献
16.
17.
Alonzo S. Yerby 《American journal of public health》1961,51(5):655-658
18.
19.
Reanne Frank Oswaldo Palma-Coca Juan Rauda-Esquivel Gustavo Olaiz-Fernández Claudia Díaz-Olavarrieta Dolores Acevedo-García 《American journal of public health》2009,99(7):1227-1231
Objectives. We examined whether remittances sent from the United States to Mexico were used to access health care in Mexico.Methods. Data were from a 2006 survey of 2 localities in the municipal city of Tepoztlán, Morelos, Mexico. We used logistic regression to determine whether household remittance expenditure on health care was associated with type of health insurance coverage.Results. Individuals who lacked insurance coverage or who were covered by the Seguro Popular program were significantly more likely to reside in households that spend remittances on health care than were individuals covered by an employer-based insurance program.Conclusions. Improving the coverage and quality of care within Mexico''s health care system will help ensure that remittances serve as a complement, and not a substitute, to formal access to care.Every year, Mexican migrants living in the United States send home billions of US dollars in the form of remittances, also known as “migradollars.” Since the 1980s, the flow of remittances has increased annually so that in 2006, Mexicans in the United States remitted 10 times the amount that was remitted in 1990, with an average annual growth rate of 15%.1 According to the Central Bank of Mexico, remittances to Mexico during 2006 totaled $23.1 billion.2 In 2007, the sum of remittances appears to have leveled off: a survey conducted for the Inter-American Development Bank estimated total remittances for 2007 to be $23.4 billion.3Existing evidence suggests that remittances are used largely to purchase basic necessities.4–7 In this context, US remittances provide migrants and their families in Mexico access to goods and services that they could not otherwise afford, including food, housing, and consumer goods. Another possibility that has received less attention in the literature is that remittances are used to access health care.Mexico is marked by large inequities in health care access and consumption.8 The provision of health care is governed by a hybrid combination of employment-based formal insurance for salaried workers, publicly provided services for those excluded from formal insurance programs, and a much smaller percentage (2%) with private insurance coverage.9 According to the 2005 Mexican Conteo de Población y Vivienda (Count of Population and Housing), approximately 40% of the Mexican population had access to a formal insurance program.10The rest of the population falls outside of the purview of formal social insurance programs and includes those who are self-employed, nonsalaried, unemployed, and informal workers; the majority of which are poor and are served by the Secretaría de Salud (SSA; Mexican Ministry of Health).9 The uninsured largely access health care through out-of-pocket payments paid either to public clinics or to a large, mostly unregulated private sector that provides fee-for-service care.11 Out-of-pocket payments represent the highest proportion of health care expenditure in Mexico.12 In an effort to reduce out-of-pocket spending and promote more equitable resource distribution, a new program called Seguro Popular (Popular Health Insurance Program) was introduced in 2004 and continues to expanded across the country.8 The program''s aim is to increase financial protection of individuals outside the formal insurance programs by providing coverage for essential interventions (249 as of 2006) and selected catastrophic treatments.11 The package of covered services will be expanded and updated annually. Currently, the program includes ambulatory care and hospitalization for basic specialties (e.g., internal medicine, general surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, geriatrics).8 As of September 2006, roughly 4 million families were enrolled in the program.11Migrants living in the United States (i.e., international migrants) and their families in Mexico may be more reliant on out-of-pocket spending on health care, which may be funded by remittances. Because they are less likely to have salaried jobs within the formal economy in Mexico, they are less likely to have access to an employer-based formal health insurance program in Mexico.13 There is some existing evidence that remittances are used to purchase health services in Mexico, although estimates vary widely. One study based on a community survey in Oaxaca estimates that as little as 1% of remittances are spent on health care.14 Estimates from a national-based survey of migrant households put the number closer to 50%.15 Such variability in estimates is likely caused by differences in sampling frames and survey methodology (e.g., whether respondents were allowed to list multiple uses for remittances or only 1). One of the few existing studies that looks explicitly at the relationship between remittances and household expenditure on health care used data from the Encuesta Nacional de Ingresos y Gastos de los Hogares (ENIGH; National Household Income and Expenditure Survey).16 The study found that households receiving remittances spend more money on primary care expenses than do those that do not receive remittances.16 Another study using the ENIGH data also found a similar effect and reported that households receiving remittances exhibit a 44% rise in the share of the household budget spent on health care.17 Data from the Encuesta Nacional a Hogares Rurales de Mexico (ENHRUM; Mexico National Rural Household Survey) found that rural households with international migrants spend more income on health than do either internal migrant households or households with no migrants.18The pattern between remittance receipt and health expenditure coupled with Mexico''s large uninsured population (estimated at over 50%) raises the possibility that remittances may be used as a compensatory mechanism to address gaps in health care provision among Mexican migrant families.8,19 If remittances serve as a method for redressing gaps in health care coverage, we would expect to find differences in how remittances are used by health insurance status. We examined whether remittances sent from Mexican immigrants in the United States to relatives in Mexico are used to pay for health care in Mexico. We tested this possibility by examining patterns of household remittance expenditure by individual health insurance status.For all analyses we used data from a household census completed in the municipal city of Tepoztlán, Morelos, Mexico. The survey included an extensive module on US migration experience and remittance expenditure as well as health and health care, which allowed us to examine the associations between remittances, health insurance status, and health status at a level of detail that previously had not been possible. 相似文献