活动平台与固定平台全膝关节置换的比较研究

目的评价人工全膝关节置换术中使用活动平台和固定平台假体治疗膝骨关节炎的早期疗效。方法对2009年3月至2011年3月收治的诊断为膝骨关节炎的患者,随机应用活动平台型假体和固定平台型假体行全膝关节置换（total knee arthroplasty,TKA）手术。记录术前及随访时术膝的膝关节评分、疼痛评分、功能评分、髌骨评分和膝关节活动度,以及股骨角、胫骨角、膝外翻角、胫骨平台后倾角、截骨高度。结果术前活动平台组和固定平台组的年龄、体重指数、患膝内翻畸形、最大屈曲角度及屈曲挛缩度均无统计学差异（P〉0.05）。术后平均随访26个月,活动平台组和固定平台组的术前术后膝关节评分、疼痛评分、功能评分、髌骨评分均无统计学差异（P〉0.05）,都明显地改善了患膝的症状和功能。活动平台组和固定平台组的术后最大屈曲度间存在显著性差异（P〈0.05）。两组的股骨角、胫骨角、膝外翻角、胫骨平台后倾角、截骨高度和术前术后髌骨高度无显著性差异（P〉0.05）。结论活动平台型假体和固定平台型假体TKA均明显改善了患膝的症状和功能,两组的膝关节评分、功能评分、疼痛评分、髌骨评分及X线检查评价差异均无统计学意义。固定平台组的术后最大屈曲度大于活动平台组的最大屈曲度。     

Proliferating and differentiating effects of three different growth factors on pluripotent mesenchymal cells and osteoblast like cells

Fixed and mobile-bearing in total knee arthroplasty are still discussed controversially. In this article, biomechanical and clinical aspects in both fixed and mobile-bearing designs were reviewed. In biomechanical aspect, the mobile-bearing design has proved to provide less tibiofemoral contact stresses under tibiofemoral malalignment conditions. It also provides less wear rate in in-vitro simulator test. Patients with posterior stabilized mobile-bearing knees had more axial tibiofemoral rotation than patients with posterior stabilized fixed-bearing knees during gait as well as in a deep knee-bend activity. However, in clinical aspect, the mid-term or long-term survivorship of mobile-bearing knees has no superiority over that of fixed-bearing knees. The theoretical advantages for mobile-bearing design to provide a long-term durability have not been demonstrated by any outcome studies. Finally, the fixed-bearing design with all-polyethylene tibial component is suggested for relatively inactive, elder people. The mobile-bearing design is suggested for younger or higher-demand patients due to the potential for reduced polyethylene wear and more normal kinematics response after joint replacement. For younger surgeon, the fixed-bearing design is suggested due to less demand for surgical technique. For experienced surgeon, one familiar surgical protocol and instrumentation is suggested rather than implant design, either fixed-bearing or mobile-bearing.     

A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years

BACKGROUND: Durable long-term independent results with the Low Contact Stress rotating-platform (mobile-bearing) and the Insall Burstein-II (fixed-bearing) total knee prostheses have been reported, but no studies describing either the mid-term or long-term results and comparing the two prostheses are available, to our knowledge. METHODS: Thirty-two patients who had bilateral arthritis of the knee with similar deformity and preoperative range of motion on both sides and who agreed to have one knee replaced with a mobile-bearing total knee design and the other with a fixed-bearing design were prospectively evaluated. Comparative analysis of both designs was done at a mean follow-up period of six years, minimizing patient, surgeon, and observer-related bias. Clinical and radiographic outcome, survival, and complication rates were compared. RESULTS: Patients with osteoarthritis had better function scores and range of motion compared with patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, with the numbers available, no benefit of mobile-bearing over fixed-bearing designs could be demonstrated with respect to Knee Society scores, range of flexion, subject preference, or patellofemoral complication rates. Radiographs showed no difference in prosthetic alignment. Two knees with a mobile-bearing prosthesis required a reoperation: one had an early revision because of bearing dislocation and another required conversion to an arthrodesis to treat a deep infection. CONCLUSIONS: We found no advantage of the mobile-bearing arthroplasty over the fixed-bearing arthroplasty with regard to the clinical results at mid-term follow-up. The risk of bearing subluxation and dislocation in knees with the mobile-bearing prosthesis is a cause for concern and may necessitate early revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II.     

Early clinical results of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized, mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a US investigational device exemption trial

Between May 2001 and June 2004, 388 total knee arthroplasty cases were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, multicenter investigational device exemption trial. Patients received either the investigational high-flexion mobile-bearing knee or a fixed-bearing control. At 2 to 4 years of follow-up, results in 293 patients with degenerative joint disease were compared using Knee Society Assessment and Function scores, radiographic results, complications analysis, and survival estimates. The mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing groups demonstrated similar, significant improvement over preoperative assessments in Knee Scores, maximum flexion, and range of motion. One mobile-bearing arthroplasty required revision. Radiographic results were unremarkable, and implant-related complications were rare in both groups. At this early follow-up, the investigational high-flexion mobile-bearing knee and its fixed-bearing counterpart demonstrated comparable, effective performance.     

Implant design affects knee arthroplasty kinematics during stair-stepping

Knee implant motions have a direct influence on patient function and implant longevity. The purpose of this study was to determine if there were consistent differences in knee motions among three groups of knee implants. Two hundred thirteen knees in 173 patients, with 25 implant designs, were studied using fluoroscopy during stair-stepping. All knee implants were assigned to one of three groups based on the design: fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized, fixed-bearing posterior cruciate-retaining, and mobile-bearing. All types of implants had the same pattern of internal/external rotations, but different designs had different anteroposterior translations. Seventy-five percent of posterior-stabilized knee implants had a medial center of rotation, indicating posterior femoral translation with flexion. Sixty-three percent of cruciate-retaining fixed-bearing knee implants had a lateral center of rotation. Eighty-six percent of mobile-bearing knee implants had a lateral center of rotation, indicating anterior femoral translation with flexion. Knee motion in patients with successful total knee arthroplasties is related directly to the constraints of the implant design.     

Gait analysis after successful mobile bearing total ankle replacement

BACKGROUND: The effect of total ankle replacement on gait is not fully known in terms of joint kinematics, ground reaction force, and activity of the muscles of the lower leg. METHODS: A comparative gait study was done in 10 patients after uneventful unilateral mobile-bearing total ankle replacement and 10 healthy controls. A rigid body model was used to describe the motion of the knee and the three-dimensional motion of the ankle-hindfoot complex during barefoot walking. An opto-electronic motion analysis system was used to analyze bilateral movement patterns, synchronized with recordings of the ipsilateral vertical ground reaction forces and the electromyographic activity of four lower leg muscles. RESULTS: Velocity was 6% lower in the patient group. Dorsiflexion in the operated ankles was reduced (p < 0.001). No differences were found in the joint angular pattern of the knee joint and only minimal changes were found at the hindfoot-to-tibia and forefoot-to-hindfoot levels. The ground reaction force at midstance was somewhat increased (p = 0.005), while the magnitude of the vertical peak at terminal stance was decreased (p < 0.001). EMG activity patterns in the patient group were normal except for a higher activity of the gastrocnemius in early stance and the anterior tibial muscle in late stance. CONCLUSIONS: There is a near normal gait pattern in terms of joint kinematics of the knee, ankle, and foot after uneventful mobile-bearing total ankle replacement. The ground reaction forces and the EMG activity, however, do not fully normalize.     

An analysis of rotating-platform total knee replacements

Rotating-platform, mobile-bearing total knee replacements have been developed to improve knee kinematics, lower contact stresses on the polyethylene tibial component, minimize constraint, and allow implant self-alignment. The purpose of the current study was to examine some of these parameters. Gait studies during normal gait showed that the stance phase was associated with knee flexion between 8 degrees and 15 degrees. Contact area studies have shown two types of rotating-platform total knee replacements, namely gait congruous (congruous only during the stance phase of gait) and totally congruous (congruous up to 90 degrees knee flexion) implants. Knee simulator studies have shown increased gravimetric wear with rotating-platform total knee replacements compared with their fixed-bearing counterparts. Rotate-only implants had less gravimetric wear than rotate and translate rotating-platform total knee replacements. Clinical studies show similar outcomes (knee scores, range of motion, and complications) when rotating-platform and fixed-bearing total knee replacements are compared. Although attractive, the benefits of rotating-platform total knee replacements still need to be proven.     

Comparison of a mobile with a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee implant

Two well-matched groups of patients with unicompartmental knee arthroplasties were compared. The first 51 knees were treated with a fixed-bearing knee implant and the second 50 knees were treated with a mobile meniscal-bearing implant. Followup was 7.7 years for the patients with fixed-bearing implants and 6.8 years for patients with mobile-bearing implants. Both groups functioned well clinically. Radiographic analysis with 3-foot standing views taken preoperatively showed both groups had an average varus alignment of -2 degrees. Postoperatively patients with fixed-bearing implants had an average +2.6 degrees alignment and the patients with mobile-bearing implants had +5.5 degrees alignment, which was significantly different. Survivorship analysis based on component loosening and revision showed a 99% survival for the meniscal-bearing implant and 93% survival for the fixed-bearing implant at 11 years. However, the fixed-bearing knee implants failed significantly more often because of tibial component failure, in six of eight knees, at an average of 6.3 years. The mobile-bearing implants showed a trend to fail because of arthritic degeneration in the lateral compartment, at an average of 10 years, although not statistically significant. The mobile-bearing implants had no tibial component failures. These differences may be attributable to implant design or surgical technique.     

Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis before and after total knee endoprosthesis implantation

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present paper was to make an objective assessment of the surgical outcome after primary knee endoprosthesis implantation by means of gait analysis. METHOD: Kinetic and kinematic parameters of gait pattern were recorded using multi-component measuring platforms integrated into a treadmill and an optoelectric measuring system. 20 patients were investigated preoperatively and on average 14 and 28 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperatively, on the affected side, the leg was used for a shorter time, but with much higher maximum forces. Mobility was reduced in the affected joint, in the adjacent hip joint, and in the contralateral joints when walking. After endoprosthesis implantation, the gait pattern approximated that of the reference group. The gait symmetry increased, and the time and force-related loading of the operated leg and the extent of mobility of the contralateral knee and both hips increased up to 28 weeks postoperatively. The clinical score according to Aichroth et al. showed a correlation with the measured values of the gait analysis at all times (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Mono-articular degenerative changes of the knee have a negative effect on the function of adjacent and contralateral joints. Endoprosthesis implantation then leads to a normalisation of pathological motion patterns, both in the operated and in the adjacent and contralateral joints. However, normal values were not yet achieved 28 weeks postoperatively, which demonstrates the possibility for further functional improvement depending on the continuity of rehabilitation.     

In vivo kinematics for fixed and mobile-bearing posterior stabilized knee prostheses

This is the first in vivo kinematic study to compare mobile-bearing with fixed-bearing prostheses in patients who had total knee arthroplasties. Femorotibial contact positions for 40 patients implanted with either a fixed-bearing or mobile-bearing prosthesis were analyzed using videofluoroscopy. Femorotibial contact paths were determined using a computer automated model-fitting technique. Nineteen of 20 patients in each group experienced posterior femoral rollback of their lateral condyles, with a mean of 3.6 and 3.7 mm for fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses respectively. Eighteen patients who had mobile-bearing prostheses and 17 patients with fixed-bearing knee prostheses experienced a normal pattern of axial rotation of 7.3 degrees and 4.1 degrees respectively. Eleven of 20 (55%) patients who had mobile-bearing prostheses implanted and eight of 20 (40%) patients who had fixed-bearing prostheses implanted did not experience femoral condylar lift-off. The remaining knees had condylar lift-off less than 2.4 mm for fixed-bearing prostheses and 1.7 mm for mobile-bearing prostheses, respectively. Patients who had mobile-bearing prostheses implanted experienced greater axial rotation and less condylar lift-off than patients who had fixed-bearing prostheses implanted. Both cruciate ligaments are sacrificed for the mobile and fixed-bearing total knee replacements. The results from the current study showed that, in both groups, the majority of patients experienced kinematics similar to those of a normal knee. However, the extent of lateral femoral condyle posterior rollback and the extent of axial rotation were less.     

A kinematic comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing knee replacements

Mobile-bearing posterior-stabilised knee replacements have been developed as an alternative to the standard fixed- and mobile-bearing designs. However, little is known about the in vivo kinematics of this new group of implants. We investigated 31 patients who had undergone a total knee replacement with a similar prosthetic design but with three different options: fixed-bearing posterior cruciate ligament-retaining, fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised and mobile-bearing posterior-stabilised. To do this we used a three-dimensional to two-dimensional model registration technique. Both the fixed- and mobile-bearing posterior-stabilised configurations used the same femoral component. We found that fixed-bearing posterior stabilised and mobile-bearing posterior-stabilised knee replacements demonstrated similar kinematic patterns, with consistent femoral roll-back during flexion. Mobile-bearing posterior-stabilised knee replacements demonstrated greater and more natural internal rotation of the tibia during flexion than fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised designs. Such rotation occurred at the interface between the insert and tibial tray for mobile-bearing posterior-stabilised designs. However, for fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised designs, rotation occurred at the proximal surface of the bearing. Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining knee replacements demonstrated paradoxical sliding forward of the femur. We conclude that mobile-bearing posterior-stabilised knee replacements reproduce internal rotation of the tibia more closely during flexion than fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised designs. Furthermore, mobile-bearing posterior-stabilised knee replacements demonstrate a unidirectional movement which occurs at the upper and lower sides of the mobile insert. The femur moves in an anteroposterior direction on the upper surface of the insert, whereas the movement at the lower surface is pure rotation. Such unidirectional movement may lead to less wear when compared with the multidirectional movement seen in fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised knee replacements, and should be associated with more evenly applied cam-post stresses.     

固定平台与旋转平台假体用于外翻膝的早期疗效观察

目的:比较外翻膝人工全膝关节置换术应用旋转平台和固定平台两型假体的早期临床疗效。方法:选取2011年1月至2013年12月吉林大学第一医院骨关节外科由同一医师进行初次人工膝关节置换的17例(23膝)进行回顾性随访研究,其中男2例,女15例;年龄48～75岁,平均61.5岁。术前诊断为骨性关节炎14例(19膝),类风湿性关节炎3例(4膝),所有膝关节有外翻畸形。其中9例(12膝)使用固定平台型假体(PFC Sigma),8例(11膝)使用旋转平台型假体(PFC Sigma RP).术前和术后随访行KSS、HSS、WOMAC评分,测量关节活动度、胫股角等指标,进行统计学分析。结果:所有患者获随访,时间6～36个月,平均25个月。两组患者膝外翻畸形均得到矫正,术后末次随访的KSS、HSS、WOMAC评分及膝关节活动度、胫股角较术前明显改善(P<0.01).其中固定平台组和旋转平台组在术后KSS、HSS、WOMAC评分以及胫骨角、膝关节活范围改善度方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而术后末次随访膝关活动范围固定平台组(101.8±8.8)°与旋转平台组(108.4±7.2)°差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).旋转平台组没有发现垫片脱位,两组术后均无感染、腓总神经麻痹、脱位、膝关节不稳等并发症发生,X线检查未见假体骨溶解及松动发生。结论:外翻膝人工全膝关节置换术使用旋转平台和固定平台型假体均能获得满意的早期临床效果,两者的近期临床疗效比较无明显差异。     

Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND: The restoration of posterior femoral translation has been shown to be an important factor in enhancing knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the ranges of motion associated with standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses in patients managed with simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Fifty patients (mean age, sixty-eight years) received a standard fixed-bearing knee prosthesis in one knee and a high-flexion fixed-bearing knee prosthesis in the contralateral knee. Two patients were men, and forty-eight were women. At a mean of 2.1 years postoperatively, the patients were assessed clinically and radiographically with use of the knee-rating systems of the Knee Society and The Hospital for Special Surgery. RESULTS: The mean postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery knee score was 90 points for the knees treated with the standard fixed-bearing prosthesis and 89.4 points for those treated with the high-flexion prosthesis. At the time of the final follow-up, the knees with the standard prosthesis had a mean range of motion of 135.8 degrees (range, 105 degrees to 150 degrees ) and those with a high-flexion prosthesis had a mean range of motion of 138.6 degrees (range, 105 degrees to 150 degrees ) (p = 0.41). No knee had aseptic loosening, revision, or osteolysis. CONCLUSIONS: After a minimum duration of follow-up of two years, we found no significant differences between the groups with regard to range of motion or clinical and radiographic parameters, except for posterior femoral condylar offset.     

The role of registry data in the evaluation of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty

The conventional wisdom that a mobile-bearing design may offer a benefit compared with a fixed-bearing design in total knee arthroplasty has not been supported by evidence. We reviewed the published literature and annual registry reports of all national and regional registries to determine the differences in clinical outcomes between mobile and fixed-bearing designs. We found only single-center reports and studies with small sample sizes in the published literature. These studies did not demonstrate any advantages of mobile bearings over fixed bearings. Moreover, major national joint registries reported higher failure rates associated with mobile-bearing total knee replacement compared with fixed-bearing total knee replacement. Similar findings from a U.S. national study in a community setting suggest that mobile-bearing knees have an increased risk of revision. After harmonization of methodologies, international collaborations of registries may provide the best insight into the performance of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in real-world settings.     

A multicenter analysis of axial femorotibial rotation after total knee arthroplasty

A multicenter analysis was done to determine in vivo femorotibial axial rotation magnitudes and patterns in 1,027 knees (normal knees, nonimplanted ACL-deficient knees, and multiple designs of total knee arthroplasty). All knees were analyzed using fluoroscopy and a three-dimensional computer model-fitting technique during a deep knee bend and/or gait. Normal knees showed 16.5 degrees and 5.7 degrees of internal tibial rotation during a deep knee bend and gait, respectively. Rotation magnitudes and the percent having normal axial rotation patterns decreased in all total knee arthroplasty groups during a deep knee bend. During gait, all knee arthroplasty groups had similar rotational patterns (limited magnitudes). Average axial rotational magnitudes in gait and a deep knee bend were similar among major implant categories (ie, fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing, etc). Average values in normal knees and ACL-retaining total knee arthroplasty patients (16.5 degrees and 8.1 degrees , respectively) were higher than in groups in which the ACL was absent (< 4.0 degrees ). All total knee arthroplasty groups had at least 19% of patients have a reverse axial rotational pattern during a deep knee bend and at least 31% during gait. Normal axial rotation patterns are essential for good patellar tracking, reduction of patellofemoral shear forces, and maximization of knee flexion.     

Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties.

The purpose of the current study was to directly compare the results of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties in the same patient who had bilateral simultaneous total knee replacements. A fixed-bearing total knee prosthesis (AMK) was implanted in one knee and a mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis (LCS) was implanted in the other knee in 116 patients. The average age of the patients was 65 years (range, 33-70 years). The average followup was 7.4 years (range, 6-8 years). Clinical and radiographic followup was done using Knee Society and Hospital for Special Surgery knee rating systems at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year after surgery, and yearly thereafter. Total knee score, pain score, mean functional score, and range of motion were comparable in both groups. Two knee replacements (2%) in one patient with AMK prostheses were revised because of complete wear of tibial bearing polyethylene. One knee replacement (1%) in one patient with an LCS prosthesis was revised because of dislocation of the medial tibial bearing polyethylene and one knee replacement (1%) in one patient with an LCS prosthesis was revised because of complete wear of the medial tibial bearing polyethylene. No knee had aseptic loosening or osteolysis in either group. After a minimum followup of 6 years, the results of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee prostheses in the current series are favorable. However, there is no evidence to prove the superiority of the mobile-bearing total knee design.     

Migration and clinical outcome of mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing single-radius total knee arthroplasty

Background and purpose — Mobile-bearing total knee prostheses (TKPs) were developed in the 1970s in an attempt to increase function and improve implant longevity. However, modern fixed-bearing designs like the single-radius TKP may provide similar advantages. We compared tibial component migration measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and clinical outcome of otherwise similarly designed cemented fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing single-radius TKPs.

Patients and methods — RSA measurements and clinical scores were assessed in 46 randomized patients at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter up to 6 years postoperatively. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze the repeated measurements.

Results — Both groups showed comparable migration (p = 0.3), with a mean migration at 6-year follow-up of 0.90?mm (95% CI 0.49–1.41) for the fixed-bearing group compared with 1.22?mm (95% CI 0.75–1.80) for the mobile-bearing group. Clinical outcomes were similar between groups. 1 fixed-bearing knee was revised for aseptic loosening after 6 years and 2 knees (1 in each group) were revised for late infection. 2 knees (1 in each group) were suspected for loosening due to excessive migration. Another mobile-bearing knee was revised after an insert dislocation due to failure of the locking mechanism 6 weeks postoperatively, after which study inclusion was preliminary terminated.

Interpretation — Fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing single-radius TKPs showed similar migration. The latter may, however, expose patients to more complex surgical techniques and risks such as insert dislocations inherent to this rotating-platform design.     

In Vivo Kinematic Comparison Between Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty During Step-Up Activity

Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) expects high conformity and low contact stress. It is designed to correct the rotational mismatch between femoral and tibial components. We examined the difference in weight-bearing knee kinematics in patients with mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing TKA performing step-up activities. We randomly assigned 40 knees (37 patients) to mobile-bearing TKA (n = 20) or fixed-bearing TKA (n = 20). Using fluoroscopic imaging we evaluated knee kinematics during step-up activity one year after surgery. The total extent of rotation was not different for the two TKAs. Due to the axial rotation of the polyethylene insert, patients with mobile-bearing TKA had a wider range of absolute axial rotation. The position of the medial and the lateral condyles was significantly more posterior in the fixed-bearing TKA. There were only minor kinematic differences between the two TKAs. The polyethylene insert in the mobile-bearing TKA moved as designed especially with respect to the self-alignment feature.