A comparative study on the antitumor effect,cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity of doxorubicin given as a bolus,continuous infusion or entrapped in liposomes in the Lou/M Wsl rat

Summary Liposome encapsulation of doxorubicin (DXR) has been shown to increase the therapeutic index of the drug in several animal systems. The prevention of peak plasma concentrations of free drug might be a major factor contributing to the beneficial effects resulting from liposome encapsulation. If so, the administration of DXR as a continuous infusion should also lead to an improved therapeutic index. In the present paper, the administration of liposome-encapsulated DXR is compared with the infusion of DXR with regard to their potential to preserve antitumor activity, enhance survival and reduce cardiomyo- and nephropathy in IgM immunocytoma-bearing Lou/M Wsl rats. Plasma concentrations of DXR were determined to correlate the biological results with pharmacokinetic parameters. Liposomes containing phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylserine and cholesterol (extrusion-multilamellar vesicles) were used. Bolus injections of free DXR (free DXR) and DXR liposomes (lip-DXR) in a multiple-dose regimen were compared with 24-h infusions of the same cumulative doses of DXR (inf-DXR). The antitumor activity of inf-DXR equalled that of free DXR as well as that of lip-DXR at doses of >0.25 mg/kg. The overall survival of tumor-bearing animals treated with 2.0 mg/kg lip-DXR was significantly prolonged (P<0.01) in comparison with that of animals treated with 2.0 mg/kg free DXR; however, treatment with 2.0 mg/kg inf-DXR did not induce a significant prolongation of survival. At a cumulative dose of 12 mg/kg, inf-DXR appeared to be as effective as lip-DXR in reducing the severity of cardiomyopathy induced by free DXR. However, for the reduction of nephropathy, only therapy with lip-DXR was effective Inf-DXR induced high nephropathy scores comparable with those obtained with free DXR. For the first 24 h after an injection of 2.0 mg/kg or after the start of a continuous infusion of 2.0 mg/kg given over 24 h, similar areas under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) were calculated for free DXR and inf-DXR. However, for lip-DXR a much higher value was calculated. The higher plasma levels of lip-DXR did not result in higher cardiac levels. After five daily doses of 2.0 mg/kg, a much lower DXR concentration was found in cardiac tissue after the administration of lip-DXR than after the administration of free DXR or inf-DXR. This suggests that an important parameter to be determined and correlated with biological results is the free (i.e. not bound to liposomes) circulating fraction of DXR in lip-DXR-injected animals. In conclusion, in the IgM immunocytoma system the administration of DXR as a continuous infusion was as effective as DXR encapsulated in liposomes in reducing cardiotoxicity while preserving the antitumor effect; this indicates that the avoidance of peak plasma levels is an important component of the mode of action of DXR-containing liposomes. However, if both antitumor efficacy and nephrotoxicity are taken into account, lip-DXR could be considered to be superior to inf-DXR.Abbreviations DXR doxorubicin - RES reticuloendothelia system - MLV multilamellar vesicle(s) - PC phosphatidylcholine - PS phosphatidylserine - chol cholesterol - free DXR bolus injection of free DXR - lip-DXR bolus injection of DXR liposomes - inf-DXR 24-h infusion of free DXR     

Longer heating duration increases localized doxorubicin deposition and therapeutic index in Vx2 tumors using MR-HIFU mild hyperthermia and thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin

Thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin (LTSL-Dox) combined with mild hyperthermia enhances the localized delivery of doxorubicin (Dox) within a heated region. The optimal heating duration and the impact of extended heating on systemic drug distribution are unknown. Here we evaluated local and systemic Dox delivery with two different mild hyperthermia durations (42?°C for 10 or 40?minutes) in a Vx2 rabbit tumor model. We hypothesized that longer duration of hyperthermia would increase Dox concentration in heated tumors without increasing systemic exposure. Temporally and spatially accurate controlled hyperthermia was achieved using a clinical MR-HIFU system for the prescribed heating durations. Forty-minutes of heating resulted in a nearly 6-fold increase in doxorubicin concentration in heated vs unheated tumors in the same animals. Therapeutic ratio, defined as the ratio of Dox delivered into the heated tumor vs the heart, increased from 1.9-fold with 10?minutes heating to 4.4-fold with 40?minutes heating. MR-HIFU can be used to guide, deliver and monitor mild hyperthermia of a Vx2 tumor model in a rabbit model, and an increased duration of heating leads to higher Dox deposition from LTSL-Dox in a target tumor without a concomitant increase in systemic exposure. Results from this preclinical study can be used to help establish clinical treatment protocols for hyperthermia mediated drug delivery.     

Comparison of intraperitoneal continuous infusion of floxuridine and bolus administration in a peritoneal gastric cancer xenograft model

Purpose To identify the optimal schedule for intraperitoneal (i.p.) infusion of floxuridine (FUDR) against peritoneal micrometastases from gastric cancer.Methods The efficacy of continuous i.p. infusion of FUDR was compared with that of bolus i.p. administration in peritoneal gastric cancer (MKN45) xenografts. The FUDR continuous delivery system in this study was in the form of injectable poly(lactic-coglycolic) acid (PLGA) microspheres intended for i.p. injection. Animals were treated by continuous i.p. infusion using FUDR-loaded microspheres or bolus i.p. administration of FUDR.Results In vitro testing demonstrated that FUDR was released slowly from the microspheres at a rate of approximately 5% of the total encapsulated drug per day. In in vivo studies, the peritoneal level was found to persist and was approximately 5- to 50-fold higher than that of plasma for more than 2 weeks following a single injection of the microspheres. An in vitro MTT assay showed that exposure time clearly influenced the cytotoxic potency of FUDR. In vivo, continuous infusion was more effective against peritoneal tumor than bolus administration at equivalent doses. However, compared with bolus administration, toxicity was increased, resulting in a reduced maximum tolerated dose (MTD) with continuous infusion. When the treatment was carried out at each MTD (continuous 1 mg/kg, bolus 600 mg/kg), continuous infusion had no advantage in inhibiting tumor growth.Conclusions Owing to the higher toxicity and the equal efficacy of continuous infusion compared with bolus administration, continuous infusion is not recommended in i.p. FUDR treatment.This study was supported in part by a grant from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and by a grant from the Setsuro Fujii Memorial Osaka Foundation for Promotion of Fundamental Medical Research.     

Direct comparison of liposomal doxorubicin with or without polyethylene glycol coating in C-26 tumor-bearing mice: is surface coating with polyethylene glycol beneficial?

Sterically stabilized liposome is characterized by a surface coating of polyethylene glycol (PEG) or other polymers that can reduce opsonization of the liposome by plasma proteins. It has a higher plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), which is believed to correlate with better therapeutic efficacy. However, the presence of large molecules on the liposomal surface may reduce the interactions of liposomes with cells and hinder entry of liposomes into the tumor tissue. Using a stable liposomal system composed of distearoyl phosphatidylcholine/cholesterol, we examined the effect of PEG (Mr 2000) on the pharmacokinetics and on the efficacy of liposomal doxorubicin with C-26 syngeneic tumor model in BALB/c mice. The plasma AUC of liposomal doxorubicin with 6 mol-% PEG-modified distearoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (PEG-DSPE) was approximately twice that of liposomal doxorubicin without PEG at various dosages, regardless of whether the mice were tumor-bearing. Paradoxically, the group of mice treated with liposomal doxorubicin without PEG had higher tumor doxorubicin concentrations. The 72-h tumor AUC was 1.44 times that of liposomal doxorubicin with 6% PEG-DSPE. The tumor-accumulation efficiency (AUC(Tumor)/AUC(Plasma)) of liposomal doxorubicin without PEG was 0.87, and this was more than twice that of the liposomal doxorubicin with 6% PEG-DSPE (0.31). At a dose of 10 mg/kg, although both liposomal groups were better than the free drug group in terms of clinically relevant parameters, including toxicity, tumor shrinkage, and survival, there was no difference between the two liposomal drug groups. In this stable liposome system, surface coating with PEG offered no benefit for liposomal doxorubicin in the C-26 tumor model. To enhance the therapeutic index of liposomal doxorubicin, simply increasing plasma AUC by surface coating with PEG may not be satisfactory.     

Computational modeling to predict effect of treatment schedule on drug delivery to prostate in humans.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a computational approach that incorporates experimental data in preclinical models to depict doxorubicin human tissue pharmacokinetics. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Beagle dogs were given 2 mg/kg doxorubicin as i.v. bolus, 4-h infusion, or 96-h infusion. Concentrations in plasma, prostate (target tissue), heart (toxicity), and major tissues for disposition were determined and modeled. Model parameters were obtained after the bolus injection with model validation based on the 4-h and 96-h infusion data. Clinical pharmacokinetic data and scale-up gave doxorubicin profiles in human prostate and heart. RESULTS: In agreement with in vitro results, tissues were best modeled with two compartments, one rapidly and one slowly equilibrating. The developed tissue distribution model predicted concentrations for all three administration regimens well, with an average deviation of 34% (median, 29%). Interspecies scale-up to humans showed that the change from a bolus injection to a slow, 96-h infusion (a) had different effects on the drug partition and accumulation in heart and prostate, and (b) lowered the peak concentration in the plasma by approximately 100-fold but had relatively little effect on maximal heart concentration ( approximately 33% lower). The simulated drug exposure in a human prostate was above the exposure required to inhibit tumor proliferation but was 30 to 50 times below that needed for cell death. CONCLUSION: The present study shows a computation-based paradigm for translating in vitro and in vivo preclinical data and to estimate and compare the drug delivery and pharmacokinetics in target tissues after different treatment schedules.     

Comparative pharmacokinetics of free doxorubicin and doxorubicin entrapped in cardiolipin liposomes

The comparative pharmacokinetics of free doxorubicin and doxorubicin entrapped in cardiolipin liposomes was evaluated in rats at a dose of 6 mg/kg i.v. Doxorubicin was entrapped in cardiolipin liposomes by using 11.2 mumol of drug, 5.6 mumol of cardiolipin, 28.5 mumol of phosphatidylcholine, 19.5 mumol of cholesterol, and 11.1 mumol of stearylamine. The peak plasma concentration with free doxorubicin at 5 min was 1.7 micrograms/ml which was reduced to 0.3 micrograms/ml by 1 h. With cardiolipin liposomes, the peak plasma concentration of doxorubicin achieved at 5 min was 20.9 micrograms/ml. The plasma levels of doxorubicin decreased gradually and by 1 h the drug concentration in plasma was 10 micrograms/ml. The plasma levels of free doxorubicin and doxorubicin entrapped in liposomes were fitted to a 3-compartment computer model. The terminal half-life with free doxorubicin in plasma was 17.3 h whereas it was 69.3 h with drug entrapped in liposomes. The area under the plasma concentration curve with liposomal doxorubicin was 81.4 micrograms X h X ml-1 compared to 1.95 micrograms X h X ml-1 observed with free doxorubicin. The steady state volume of distribution with free doxorubicin was about 23-fold higher than liposomal doxorubicin. The terminal half-life with free doxorubicin in cardiac tissue was 17.9 h compared to 12.6 h with drug encapsulated in liposomes. The terminal half-lives in liver and spleen following administration of liposomal doxorubicin were 15- and 2.3-fold higher, respectively, compared to free drug; furthermore, the concentration X time values of liposomal doxorubicin in liver were 26-fold higher and in spleen 6-fold higher than the free drug. Free doxorubicin and doxorubicin entrapped in liposomes demonstrated 17 and 20% excretion in bile of the injected dose, respectively, in rats. The present studies demonstrate that liposomal encapsulation of doxorubicin significantly alters its pharmacokinetics in plasma and tissues compared to free drug.     

A new procedure for the preparation of liposomal doxorubicin: biological activity in multidrug-resistant tumor cells

We describe a new procedure for the preparation of liposomal doxorubicin. Doxorubicin can be efficiently complexed to preformed or lyophilized cardiolipin-containing liposomes. Complex formation was performed by vigorous vortexing. As much as 96.8% of the initial drug quanitty may be bound to those liposomes under optimal incubation conditions (4 h at 37°C). The binding study showed the presence of two levels of specific binding (dissociation constants, 28±8 M and 1.0±0.3 mM). The drug is firmly integrated in the liposome-membrane lipid bilayer rather than binding at the surface. Cytotoxicity studies using tumor cells revealed efficient drug delivery using liposome-complexed doxorubicin. This new liposomal doxorubicin preparation reverses multidrug resistance in MCF-7/ADR and CH LZ cells at levels equivalent to that obtained with a previously described liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin preparation, showing that the drug is integrated as well in the liposome carrier and is transported as well into cells. Increased concentration of liposomes at the subcytotoxic level in liposome-complexed doxorubicin enhances drug cytotoxicity in multidrug-resistant CH LZ cells as compared with liposome-encapsulated drug. This new preparation for liposomal doxorubicin may be carried out immediately prior to clinical administration, offering advantages in terms of cost and stability.Abbreviations Dox Doxorubicin - Lip liposomes - Dox-Lip liposomally encapsulated doxorubicin - Dox+Lip liposomally associated doxorubicin - MDR multidrug resistance     

Clinical pharmacology of liposomal anthracyclines: focus on pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is a liposomal formulation with a distinct pharmacokinetic profile characterized by an extended circulation time and a reduced volume of distribution. Biodistribution animal studies indicate preferential accumulation of PLD into various implanted mouse-human tumors, with an enhancement of liposomal drug tumor levels compared with free drugs. The extended circulation time of pegylated liposomes and their ability to extravasate through the leaky vasculature of tumors results in the enhanced delivery of liposomal drug and/or radiotracers to the tumor site in patients with cancer. In malignant effusions, Kaposi sarcoma skin lesions, and a variety of solid tumors there is evidence of selective tumor uptake detected by various methods. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has been approved for clinical use in a variety of neoplastic conditions because of its antitumor efficacy and unique safety profile with an impressive reduction of cardiac toxicity in comparison with conventional doxorubicin.     

From conventional to stealth liposomes: a new frontier in cancer chemotherapy

Many attempts have been made to achieve good selectivity to targeted tumor cells by preparing specialized carrier agents that are therapeutically profitable for anticancer therapy. Among these, liposomes are the most studied colloidal particles thus far applied in medicine and in particular in antitumor therapy. Although they were first described in the 1960s, only at the beginning of 1990s did the first therapeutic liposomes appear on the market. The first-generation liposomes (conventional liposomes) comprised a liposome-containing amphotericin B, Ambisome (Nexstar, Boulder, CO, USA), used as an antifungal drug, and Myocet (Elan Pharma Int, Princeton, NJ, USA), a doxorubicin-containing liposome, used in clinical trials to treat metastatic breast cancer. The second-generation liposomes ("pure lipid approach") were long-circulating liposomes, such as Daunoxome, a daunorubicin-containing liposome approved in the US and Europe to treat AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. The third-generation liposomes were surface-modified liposomes with gangliosides or sialic acid, which can evade the immune system responsible for removing liposomes from circulation. The fourth-generation liposomes, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, were called "stealth liposomes" because of their ability to evade interception by the immune system, in the same way as the stealth bomber was able to evade radar. Actually, the only stealth liposome on the market is Caelyx/Doxil (Schering-Plough, Madison NJ, USA), used to cure AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma, resistant ovarian cancer and metastatic breast cancer. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is characterized by a very long-circulation half-life, favorable pharmacokinetic behavior and specific accumulation in tumor tissues. These features account for the much lower toxicity shown by Caelyx in comparison to free doxorubicin, in terms of cardiotoxicity, vesicant effects, nausea, vomiting and alopecia. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin also appeared to be less myelotoxic than doxorubicin. Typical forms of toxicity associated to it are acute infusion reaction, mucositis and palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia, which occur especially at high doses or short dosing intervals. Active and cell targeted liposomes can be obtained by attaching some antigen-directed monoclonal antibodies (Moab or Moab fragments) or small proteins and molecules (folate, epidermal growth factor, transferrin) to the distal end of polyethylene glycol in pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. The most promising therapeutic application of liposomes is as non-viral vector agents in gene therapy, characterized by the use of cationic phospholipids complexed with the negatively charged DNA plasmid. The use of liposome formulations in local-regional anticancer therapy is also discussed. Finally, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin containing radionuclides are used in clinical trials as tumor-imaging agents or in positron emission tomography.     

Liposomal encapsulation of topotecan enhances anticancer efficacy in murine and human xenograft models

Topotecan was encapsulated in sphingomyelin/cholesterol liposomes using an ionophore-generated proton gradient. After i.v. injection, liposomal topotecan was eliminated from the plasma much more slowly than free drug, resulting in a 400-fold increase in plasma area under the curve. Further, high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of plasma samples demonstrated that topotecan was protected from hydrolysis within the liposomal carrier with >80% of the drug remaining as the active, lactone species up to 24 h. The improved pharmacokinetics observed with liposomal topotecan correlated with increased efficacy in both murine and human tumor models. In the L1210 ascitic tumor model, optimal doses of liposomal topotecan resulted in a 60-day survival rate of 60-80%, whereas in a L1210 liver metastasis model, 100% long-term survival (>60 days) was achieved. In contrast, long-term survivors were rarely seen after treatment with free topotecan. Further, in a human breast carcinoma model (MDA 435/LCC6), liposomal topotecan provided greatly improved increase in life span relative to the free drug. These results suggest that liposomal encapsulation can significantly enhance the therapeutic activity of topotecan.     

Antitumor and toxicity evaluation of free doxorubicin and doxorubicin entrapped in cardiolipin liposomes

Summary The antitumor activity of free doxorubicin and doxorubicin entrapped in cardiolipin liposomes was evaluated in P388 ascitic leukemia, disseminated Gross leukemia, and advanced mammary carcinoma. In P388 leukemia, free drug and drug entrapped in liposomes demonstrated equivalent antitumor activity at doses of 2.2 and 4.4 mg/kg, demonstrating 52% and 69% ILS (increase in life-span), respectively. Free doxorubicin at a dose of 10 mg/kg was superior, producing a 185% ILS against 82% with liposomal doxorubicin. With an increase in administered dose the antitumor response with liposomal doxorubicin was much more pronounced; at doses of 20 and 25 mg/kg the ILS was in excess of 376%, with five of ten mice surviving tumor-free. In Gross leukemia, the optimum dose of free doxorubicin, 10 mg/kg, brought about 186% T/C (median survival in treated mice over that in controls, x100), whereas with liposomal doxorubicin the optimum dose was 16.9 mg/kg, which yielded 214% T/C. In advanced mammary carcinoma, the maximum tumor regression with free doxorubicin was at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg, with two of six mice dying of toxicity. Liposomal doxorubicin caused maximum tumor regression at 10.8 mg/kg dose with no toxic deaths. Doxorubicin entrapped in cardiolipin liposomes was much less toxic than free drug at high doses in normal mice.This work was supported by a grant from the American Heart Association (82-922) and by PHSCA 5P30 CA 1-4626     

Comparative pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin given by three different schedules with equal dose intensity in patients with breast cancer

Summary The pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin given according to three different schedules with a similar dosetime intensity have been studied and compared in 16 women with metastatic breast cancer. Six patients were treated with doxorubicin 75 mg/m² by i.v. bolus repeated every 3 weeks; 5 patients received doxorubicin by 4-day continuous infusion every 3 weeks (4 at 75 mg/m² and 1 at 60 mg/m²); 5 patients received 25 mg/m² by i.v. bolus given weekly. Timed blood samples were collected and plasma levels of doxorubicin and its metabolite doxorubicinol were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Peak plasma concentrations were measured, and areas under the concentration-time curves calculated. Peak plasma levels of doxorubicin were significantly lower with the 4-day infusion than with either of the bolus injections. The 4-day infusion, however, gave significantly greater total exposure to doxorubicin and doxorubicinol, as indicated by area under the concentration-time curve, than weekly or 3-weekly bolus treatment. A single bolus injection of doxorubicin 25 mg/m² yielded a total exposure to doxorubicin approximately half that achieved with a 75 mg/m² bolus injection. Over a 3-week period, therefore, total exposure to doxorubicin would be greater with the weekly low-dose schedule than with the 3-weekly administration. We conclude that drug scheduling has significant effects on doxorubicin pharmacokinetics.     

Increased preclinical efficacy of irinotecan and floxuridine coencapsulated inside liposomes is associated with tumor delivery of synergistic drug ratios

Whether anticancer drug combinations act synergistically or antagonistically often depends on the ratio of the agents being combined. We show here that combinations of irinotecan and floxuridine exhibit drug ratio-dependent cytotoxicity in a broad panel of tumor cell lines in vitro where a 1:1 molar ratio consistently provided synergy and avoided antagonism. In vivo delivery of irinotecan and floxuridine coencapsulated inside liposomes at the synergistic 1:1 molar ratio (referred to as CPX-1) lead to greatly enhanced efficacy compared to the two drugs administered as a saline-based cocktail in a number of human xenograft and murine tumor models. When compared to liposomal irinotecan or liposomal floxuridine, the therapeutic activity of CPX-1 in vivo was not only superior to the individual liposomal agents, but the extent of tumor growth inhibition was greater than that predicted for combining the activities of the individual agents. In contrast, liposome delivery of irinotecan:floxuridine ratios shown to be antagonistic in vitro provided antitumor activity that was actually less than that achieved with liposomal irinotecan alone, indicative of in vivo antagonism. Synergistic antitumor activity observed for CPX-1 was associated with maintenance of the 1:1 irinotecan:floxuridine molar ratio in plasma and tumor tissue over 16-24 h. In contrast, injection of the drugs combined in saline resulted in irinotecan:floxuridine ratios that changed 10-fold within 1 h in plasma and sevenfold within 4 h in tumor tissue. These results indicate that substantial improvements in the efficacy of drug combinations may be achieved by maintaining in vitro-identified synergistic drug ratios after systemic administration using drug delivery vehicles.     

Plasma and tumor concentrations of cisplatin following intraperitoneal infusion or bolus injection with or without continuous low-dose-rate irradiation

Our purpose of this study was to determine whether whole-body, continuous low-dose-rate irradiation (CLDRI) alters the plasma and/or tumor platinum pharmacokinetics after ip bolus injection or ip infusion as a possible mechanism of interaction between CLDRI and cisplatin. The C3Hf/Sed mice bearing SCCVII/SF tumors were given 6 mg cisplatin/kg ip by bolus injection or an ip infusion of 0.25 mg cisplatin.kg-1.hour-1 for 48 hours with and without CLDRI at 0.56 Gy/hr for 24 or 48 hours. Plasma and tumor platinum concentrations were determined with an atomic absorption spectrophotometer at appropriate intervals during infusion and up to 48 hours after drug administration. Both total and ultrafilterable plasma platinum followed a biphasic elimination after ip bolus injection, whereas only a prolonged single-phase elimination was seen after ip infusion. Tumor uptake of platinum appeared to follow a passive diffusion pattern with a prolonged cellular retention of platinum. Whole-body CLDRI had no apparent effect on the pharmacokinetics of plasma and tumor platinum administered by ip bolus injection or prolonged continuous infusion.     

In vitro and in vivo characterization of doxorubicin and vincristine coencapsulated within liposomes through use of transition metal ion complexation and pH gradient loading.

PURPOSE: There is an opportunity to augment the therapeutic potential of drug combinations through use of drug delivery technology. This report summarizes data obtained using a novel liposomal formulation with coencapsulated doxorubicin and vincristine. The rationale for selecting these drugs is due in part to the fact that liposomal formulations of doxorubicin and vincristine are being separately evaluated as components of drug combinations. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Doxorubicin and vincristine were coencapsulated into liposomes using two distinct methods of drug loading. A manganese-based drug loading procedure, which relies on drug complexation with a transition metal, was used to encapsulate doxorubicin. Subsequently the ionophore A23187 was added to induce formation of a pH gradient, which promoted vincristine encapsulation. RESULTS: Plasma elimination studies in mice indicated that the drug:drug ratio before injection [4:1 doxorubicin:vincristine (wt:wt ratio)] changed to 20:1 at the 24-h time point, indicative of more rapid release of vincristine from the liposomes than doxorubicin. Efficacy studies completed in MDA MB-435/LCC6 tumor-bearing mice suggested that at the maximum tolerated dose, the coencapsulated formulation was therapeutically no better than liposomal vincristine. This result was explained in part by in vitro cytotoxicity studies evaluating doxorubicin and vincristine combinations analyzed using the Chou and Talalay median effect principle. These data clearly indicated that simultaneous addition of vincristine and doxorubicin resulted in pronounced antagonism. CONCLUSION: These results emphasize that in vitro drug combination screens can be used to predict whether a coformulated drug combination will act in an antagonistic or synergistic manner.     

Phase II study of vinorelbine administered by 96-hour infusion in patients with advanced breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine given by weekly bolus injection is active and less toxic than bolus vinblastine in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma. Vinblastine given by 5-day continuous infusion showed a steep dose-response curve. Pharmacokinetic studies of vinorelbine showed that it is possible to achieve a comparable antitumor effect with a smaller amount of the drug if it is given by continuous infusion. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of vinorelbine given by 96-hour continuous infusion to patients with refractory metastatic breast carcinoma patients. METHODS: Between May 1996 and August 1997, 47 patients with metastatic breast carcinoma were registered into the study. All patients previously had received doxorubicin and 70% had undergone prior paclitaxel treatment. Approximately 56% of the patients had >/=2 metastatic sites. All patients received vinorelbine according to the following dose schedule: 8 mg bolus followed by 11 mg/m(2) by continuous infusion over 24 hours every 4 days every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were evaluable for response. A total of 193 cycles were administered. The overall response rate was 16% (2 patients achieved a complete response and 5 patients achieved a partial response). The median duration of response was 4.3 months and the median overall survival was 8.6 months. Patients with visceral metastases and/or multiple sites of involvement had shorter durations of response than patients with only soft tissue disease or single-site metastasis (3.1 months vs. 4. 9 months) and shorter overall survival (8.1 months vs. 12 months). Dose reductions were necessary due to cumulative stomatitis and/or fatigue in 12 cycles and neutropenia and/or infection in 13 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Due to toxicity, a revised maximum tolerated dose for continuous infusion vinorelbine is proposed by the authors: 8 mg intravenously over 10 minutes followed by 10 mg/m(2) by continuous infusion over 24 hours every 4 days. The current dose schedule did not offer an advantage either in response rates or survival over the weekly vinorelbine bolus injection in doxorubicin-resistant and paclitaxel-resistant patients.     

Convection-enhanced delivery of liposomal doxorubicin in intracranial brain tumor xenografts

We previously reported that convection-enhanced delivery (CED) of liposomes into brain tissue and intracranial brain tumor xenografts produced robust tissue distribution that can be detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Considering image-guided CED of therapeutic liposomes as a promising strategy for the treatment of brain tumors, we evaluated the efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin delivered by CED in an animal model. Distribution, toxicity, and efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin after CED were evaluated in a U251MG human glioblastoma intracranial xenograft model. CED of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin achieved good distribution in brain tumor tissue and surrounding normal brain tissue. Distribution was not affected by the particle concentration of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, but tissue toxicity increased at higher concentrations. CED of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, at a dose not toxic to normal rat brain (0.1 mg/ml doxorubicin), was significantly more efficacious than systemic administration of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin at the maximum tolerated dose. CED of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin resulted in improved survival compared to CED of free doxorubicin at the same dose. Outcomes of this study suggest that CED of liposomal drugs is a promising approach for the treatment of glioblastoma.     

Doxorubicin and doxorubicinol pharmacokinetics and tissue concentrations following bolus injection and continuous infusion of doxorubicin in the rabbit

Cumulative dose-related, chronic cardiotoxicity is a serious clinical complication of anthracycline therapy. Clinical and animal studies have demonstrated that continuous infusion, compared to bolus injection of doxorubicin, decreases the risk of cardiotoxicity. Continuous infusion of doxorubicin may result in decreased cardiac tissue concentrations of anthracyclines, including the primary metabolite doxorubicinol, which may also be an important contributor to cardiotoxicity. In this study, doxorubicin and doxorubicinol plasma pharmacokinetics and tissue concentrations were compared in New Zealand white rabbits following intravenous administration of doxorubicin (5 mg·kg^–1) by bolus and continuous infusion. Blood samples were obtained over a 72-h period after doxorubicin administration to determine plasma doxorubicin and doxorubicinol concentrations. Rabbits were killed 7 days after the completion of doxorubicin administration and tissue concentrations of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol in heart, kidney, liver, and skeletal muscle were measured. In further experiments, rabbits were killed 1 h after bolus injection of doxorubicin and at the completion of a 24-h doxorubicin infusion (anticipated times of maximum heart anthracycline concentrations) to compare cardiac concentrations of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol following both methods of administration. Peak plasma concentrations of doxorubicin (1739±265 vs 100±10 ng·ml^–1) and doxorubicinol (78±3 vs 16±3 ng·ml^–1) were significantly higher following bolus than infusion dosing. In addition, elimination half-life of doxorubicinol was increased following infusion. However, other plasma pharmacokinetic parameters for doxorubicin and doxorubicinol, including AUC, were similar following both methods of doxorubicin administration. Peak left ventricular tissue concentrations of doxorubicin (16.92±0.9 vs 3.59±0.72 g·g^–1 tissue;P<0.001) and doxorubicinol (0.24±0.02 vs 0.09±0.01 g·g^–1 tissue;P<0.01) following bolus injection of doxorubicin were significantly higher than those following infusion administration. Tissue concentrations of parent drug and metabolite in bolus and infusion groups were similar 7 days after dosing. The results suggest that cardioprotection following doxorubicin infusion may be related to attenuation of the peak plasma or cardiac concentrations of doxorubicin and/or doxorubicinol.     

Cellular pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: comparison of bolus administration and continuous infusion

The purpose of this study was to determine whether administration of doxorubicin (DOX) as a continuous infusion or a bolus injection resulted in similar leukemic cell drug concentration in patients with refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This study was carried out on five patients with refractory CLL, with DOX administered either as a bolus injection (35 mg/m²; CHOP protocol) or as a constant-rate infusion for a period of 96 h (9 mg/m² per day; VAD protocol). The two types of drug administration were used alternatively with the same patient. Plasma and cellular DOX concentration were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. Peak plasma DOX levels were higher after the bolus injection than after continuous administration (1509±80 ng/ml vs 11.6±1.8 ng/ml, respectively), whereas the plasma area under the curve (AUC) levels were similar. Maximum DOX cellular concentrations were 8629±2902 ng/10⁹ cells (bolus injection) and 2745±673 ng/10⁹ cells (96 h infusion). The cellular AUC after the bolus injection was 2.85 times greater than that observed after continuous administration. This difference was due to a higher cellular peak level followed by a relatively prolonged retention of the drug, with a loss of only 25% in the first 24 h following. These findings demonstrated that in CLL the cellular DOX exposure can be notably modified by the method of drug administration, with higher drug intracellular concentrations being achieved after bolus administration than with the infusion schedule.     

Liposome-based drug delivery in breast cancer treatment

Drug delivery systems can in principle provide enhanced efficacy and/or reduced toxicity for anticancer agents. Long circulating macromolecular carriers such as liposomes can exploit the 'enhanced permeability and retention' effect for preferential extravasation from tumor vessels. Liposomal anthracyclines have achieved highly efficient drug encapsulation, resulting in significant anticancer activity with reduced cardiotoxicity, and include versions with greatly prolonged circulation such as liposomal daunorubicin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Pegylated liposomal doxorubucin has shown substantial efficacy in breast cancer treatment both as monotherapy and in combination with other chemotherapeutics. Additional liposome constructs are being developed for the delivery of other drugs. The next generation of delivery systems will include true molecular targeting; immunoliposomes and other ligand-directed constructs represent an integration of biological components capable of tumor recognition with delivery technologies.