Operative angiography by intraarterial digital subtraction angiography: a new technique for quality control of carotid endarterectomy

Fifty patients who had carotid bifurcation endarterectomy as their sole surgical procedure underwent intraoperative completion angiography by means of portable intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. All had subsequent intravenous digital subtraction angiography or duplex scanning during early follow-up. After the endarterectomy site was closed and before the wound was closed, 6 to 8 ml of contrast was injected through a 21-gauge needle while fluoroscopy was performed with a conventional C-arm. The C-arm was coupled to a Quantel IDIS Mobile Digital Subtraction Angiogram Unit (Quantel Medical Products Group, Clemmons, N.C.) for image enhancement and immediate playback. There were no postoperative deaths or neurologic complications. Abnormal radiographic results led to reopening of endarterectomy sites in eight patients, which resulted in successful correction of the defects. There was a single asymptomatic occlusion of the internal carotid artery at 3 weeks in the patient with the only false-negative result on the completion study. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography is a safe and useful technique for intraoperative quality control of carotid endarterectomy. It provides visual images that can be easily repeated in several projections, uses small volumes of contrast, and has no timing requirements for filming and injecting.     

Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of patients for carotid endarterectomy

Preoperative intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV DSA) was compared with the operative findings in 54 patients who underwent a total of 57 carotid endarterectomies, to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative IV DSA in predicting the lesion found at surgery. Four studies early in the series were technically unsatisfactory, leaving 50 patients with 53 procedures for evaluation. Severe carotid artery stenosis was accurately predicted in all cases. Deep ulceration in the absence of severe carotid stenosis was reliably shown by IV DSA, although it was not reliably demonstrated by either IV DSA or carotid angiography if severe stenosis was also present. As severe carotid stenosis or deep ulceration are the major radiological indications for carotid endarterectomy, the authors have found that technically satisfactory IV DSA is an adequate preoperative imaging technique.     

Incidence of recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy determined by digital subtraction angiography

The results of recent reports of nonselected patients studied by noninvasive techniques suggest there is a 10 to 36 percent rate of restenosis within the first 1 to 2 years after carotid endarterectomy. In the present study of nonselected patients examined by intravenous digital subtraction angiography, only 6.7 percent of operated vessels had recurrent stenosis with a 50 percent or greater decrease in vessel diameter at a mean of 28.5 months postoperatively. These data, when compared with the results of most noninvasive studies, suggest that many of the early lesions regress after 1 to 2 years, as suggested by Zierler et al [8] or that there is a true difference in the rates of restenosis between centers, possibly due to subtle differences in surgical technique or patient risk factors, or both. A symptomatic recurrence rate of only 2.7 percen and a 6.7 percent overall rate of hemodynamically significant recurrent stenosis support the conclusions from earlier and larger series that carotid endarterectomy is a highly effective and durable operation. Although it is important that research centers continue to study the natural history of carotid artherosclerosis and serial changes after carotid endarterectomy, these results suggest that for routine clinical follow-up, frequent and expensive periodic tests to detect recurrent stenosis may not be warranted.     

Comparison of standard carotid endarterectomy with Dacron patch angioplasty versus eversion carotid endarterectomy during a 4-year period

Currently, the two primary approaches to carotid endarterectomy for extracranial carotid stenosis are carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty and eversion carotid endarterectomy. In a retrospective study over a 4-year period from 1998 to 2002, we had an opportunity to compare the two approaches as two surgeons utilized carotid endarterectomy with Dacron patch angioplasty and two other surgeons utilized eversion carotid endarterectomy. During the 4-year period, 189 carotid endarterectomies were performed, 125 with Dacron patch angioplasty (CE-P) and 64 with eversion (EE) endarterectomy. There were no significant differences in age of the patients, operative indication, or associated risk factors between the two groups. Perioperative outcome measurement in the CE-P versus EE included stroke or transient ischemic attack, 1.6 per cent versus 1.56 per cent, cranial nerve injury, 2.4 per cent versus 3.13 per cent; death, 0.8 per cent versus 0 per cent; need for operative conversion or revision, 2.4 per cent versus 7.81 per cent, respectively. Only the need for operative conversion or revision reached significant difference (P < 0.05), although the need decreased to 4 per cent for the last 50 EE cases. Recurrent stenosis of 50 per cent to 79 per cent was 4.88 per cent versus 3.13 per cent and >80 per cent was 0.81 per cent versus 0 per cent in the CE-P versus EE group over a follow up of 16.3 months and 17.0 months, respectively. We conclude that both CE-P and EE are equally efficacious operative approaches to extracranial carotid occlusive disease.     

Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch angioplasty in carotid endarterectomy

Purpose: This study retrospectively reviewed the experience with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) patches for carotid endarterectomy in 924 consecutive procedures (753 patients) during a 17-year period.Methods: The records of all patients who underwent ePTFE patch angioplasty for carotid artery stenosis performed by one surgeon were reviewed. The criterion for surgery was stenosis of 80% or greater. Follow-up by use of noninvasive methods was done by 6 months after operation the first year and annually thereafter. Recurrent stenosis was confirmed with angiography. Life-table analysis was used to estimate the risk of restenosis.Results: Early morbidity and mortality included six deaths (0.6%), seven nonfatal strokes (0.9%), and 19 hemorrhages. Two postoperative infections occurred. There were no important aneurysmal dilations and no late hemorrhages. With a mean follow-up of 41.4 months (range 0 to 197), recurrent stenosis necessitating reoperation developed in 28 patients (3.7%). There were two late strokes. Life-table analysis indicated a 89% probability of freedom from stenosis at 120 months.Conclusions: In cases in which the decision to perform patch angioplasty is made at surgery, an ePTFE patch is an excellent alternative to autogenous saphenous vein, with a low rate of recurrences requiring operation and acceptable rates of perioperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality. (J VASC SURG 1995;22:724-31.)     

Bovine pericardial patch angioplasty in carotid endarterectomy

Patch angioplasty during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been shown to reduce the incidence of both early and late complications. Controversy continues, however, over the ideal patch material. Bovine pericardium (Vascu-Guard Biovascular Inc., Saint Paul, MN) offers an attractive alternative to other patch materials because of its handling and suturing characteristics that are similar to that of autogenous material. This study examines the perioperative and midterm results of bovine pericardial patch angioplasty during CEA. We studied 112 patients who underwent 129 CEAs with bovine pericardial patch angioplasty during an 18-month period. Data were collected regarding demographics, operative indications, perioperative complications, and the occurrence of late adverse outcomes based primarily on follow-up arterial duplex studies. Among this group there were 63 male (56%) and 49 female (44%) patients whose mean age was 71.8 +/- 9.1 years. In these patients there was the typical distribution of atherosclerotic risk factors. Seventy-four patients (66%) had symptomatic disease preoperatively and the remaining 38 patients (34%) were asymptomatic. Temporary cranial nerve palsy occurred in three patients (2%). There were no perioperative strokes, acute occlusions, bleeding episodes requiring reoperation, or deaths. The patients were followed up to 54 months postoperatively with a mean follow-up time of 41.7 +/- 4.4 months. During this period two patients (2%) developed three significant restenoses (70-99%). All required reoperation. There were no asymptomatic occlusions, infections, aneurysms, or rupture. These data demonstrate that bovine pericardial patch angioplasty during CEA is associated with a low incidence of both perioperative and midterm adverse outcomes.     

Double-layer everted saphenous vein patch angioplasty for carotid endarterectomy

Saphenous vein patch angioplasty is the preferred method of closure of the arteriotomy site during carotid endarterectomies. A major early complication of the saphenous vein patch is rupture of the patch which can occur within the first few postoperative days. The reported incidence varies from 0.5% to 4%. Patch rupture can result in stroke or death. From May 1992 to April 1999, autogenous everted double-layer saphenous vein patch was used in 192 carotid endarterectomies performed on 168 patients; 96 males and 72 females. The age range was from 54 to 94 years with a mean age of 73 years. The saphenous vein is harvested from the ankle. It is everted and then used as a double-layer patch. The follow-up period was from 3 to 74 months, with a mean of 24 months. Postoperatively, there were no patch ruptures or late aneurysm formation. There was no perioperative mortality. Everted double-layer saphenous vein patch eliminates the risk of patch rupture and at the same time retains the benefits of an autologous nonprosthetic graft. Saphenous vein from the ankle can be safely used for carotid angioplasty as a double layer patch.     

Late follow-up of carotid endarterectomy with venous patch angioplasty

Ninety carotid endarterectomies with venous patch angioplasty were performed in 83 patients between July 1980 and December 1985. The primary indication for patching was a small-caliber internal carotid artery (ICA) with a diameter less than 3.0 mm in 54 arteriotomies (60%). Patency of the endarterectomy was evaluated by completion arteriography in all instances. Follow-up was conducted after an intermediate postoperative period of 21 +/- 12.5 months in 69 sides by arteriography. A late follow-up was conducted at 55.4 +/- 11.2 months either by arteriography (in 45 sides) or by carotid duplex scanning (in 11 sides). Twenty-one patients with 23 endarterectomies died, only 1 of a cerebral event. Seven patients moved or refused study and five were lost to follow-up. Three recurrent stenoses and five carotid occlusions developed by the time of the intermediate follow-up. By the time of late follow-up, three additional patients developed recurrent stenoses. Our results suggest that recurrent stenosis continues to develop with a longer period of follow-up in patients undergoing venous patch angioplasty with carotid endarterectomy.     

The role of patch closure in current-day carotid endarterectomy

BackgroundIt has long been debated whether it is preferable to perform conventional carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with or without patch closure. Although most contemporary surgeons patch, many still do not. Recent small studies have surfaced implying patching is unnecessary. The objective of our analysis was to determine the difference in short- and long-term outcomes according to patch use in a large modern, cross-specialty database.MethodsAnalyzing more than 118,000 records from the Vascular Quality Initiative, multimodel inference was used to evaluate the effect of patch use on important outcomes of conventional CEA. The composite short-term outcome included any ipsilateral neurological event, return to the operating room for a neurological event, and an increase in the Rankin score postoperatively. Late composite outcome incorporated restenosis as well as early and late ipsilateral neurological events.ResultsPatch use for conventional CEA closure was found to be a strong predictor of both early and late outcomes, as evidenced by its Akaike importance weight of 0.99. Examining predischarge events, patch closure is associated with a decrease in major negative events (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-0.6). For long-term events, such closure offers a decrease in untoward outcome (odds ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-0.9).ConclusionsAnalysis in a large current-day database suggests that patch closure of conventional CEA effects superior short- and long-term outcomes.     

External carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty using internal jugular vein--two case reports.

A 59-year-old male and a 74-year-old male presented with occlusion of the right internal carotid artery and stenosis at the origin of the ipsilateral external carotid artery manifesting as cerebral ischemia. External carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty using the internal jugular vein was performed. Special care was taken to obliterate the stump of the carotid artery using a Weck clip in one case and plication with non-absorbable sutures in the other. Cerebral blood flow in the affected hemisphere was increased after surgery and the patients remained asymptomatic. External carotid endarterectomy has several special aspects such as patch angioplasty and elimination of the stump which must be understood.     

Intravenous digital subtraction angiography for extracranial carotid artery disease

Intravenous digital subtraction angiography is relatively hazardous and inaccurate. It appears from the literature to have little place in either the screening of patients with putative carotid artery disease or in the assessment of those about to undergo carotid endarterectomy.     

Nine-year experience of bovine pericardium patch angioplasty during carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE: This paper examines the clinical results of a 9-year experience in which the incidence of major (stroke and death) perioperative events and of recurrent stenosis (>60%) after carotid endarterectomy performed with a direct suture (DS) of the arteriotomy versus bovine pericardium patch angioplasty (BPPA) are compared. Methods and Materials: A total of 517 carotid endarterectomies were included in this nonrandomized study and were divided into two groups: group DS with 194 procedures and group BPPA with 323 procedures. All patients were entered in a follow-up program that ranged from 1 to 108 months (mean, 56.4 months) and included color duplex scan examinations at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and every year thereafter. RESULTS: The number of major (stroke and death) perioperative cerebrovascular accidents was eight (4.1%) in the DS Group and five (1.5%) in the BPPA group (P =.066). One death occurred in the DS group, and three occurred in the BPPA Group (P =.517). The four deaths in both groups were the result of strokes. No statistically significant difference was found in terms of early neurologic complications between the two groups. During the first year of follow-up study, the rate of restenosis >60% and occlusion was significantly lower in the BPPA group. Thereafter, the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the use of BPPA or DS during carotid endarterectomy procedure does not cause a significantly different rate of perioperative major events (stroke or death) in the two groups. The incidence rate of restenosis is lower in the first year after surgery with BPPA, but in subsequent years, no significant difference in restenosis is seen. The early and late postoperative results with BPPA compare favorably with the reported data from literature with the use of other patch materials.     

Infected false aneurysm following carotid endarterectomy with vein patch angioplasty

The authors report a case of infected false aneurysm that developed after carotid endarterectomy with vein patch angioplasty. This complication is extremely rare and occurs most commonly when a Dacron patch graft has been employed. Various clinical presentations are described and the etiology of infection is discussed. Surgical management consisted of the resection of the pseudoaneurysm and segmental replacement with vein. Parenteral antibiotic therapy was given for three weeks and topical irrigation with an antiseptic solution performed for two weeks.     

Postoperative infection associated with polyester patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative infection is one of the most dreaded complications associated with use of synthetic patches for carotid endarterectomy. Although polyester patches were used extensively for carotid patch angioplasty throughout the last decade, few reports detail cases of deep patch infection. We describe our experience with polyester patch infections after carotid endarterectomy.Patients and methods From January 1996 through December 2001 we treated polyester patch infections after carotid endarterectomy in 10 patients. RESULTS: The interval from primary carotid endarterectomy to presentation with infection ranged from 11 days to 30 months. All patients underwent repeat operation that involved tissue debridement, excision of the polyester patch, and either interposition grafting or patch angioplasty with autologous vein. No perioperative stroke or death occurred; however, 1 patient had transient hoarseness, and in 1 patient a pseudoaneurysm developed that required additional surgical repair with a saphenous vein interposition graft. All patients remain well and free of infection with follow-up as long as 56 months. CONCLUSIONS: Infection is a serious and rare complication of carotid patch angioplasty with polyester material. Nonetheless, it can be treated successfully with good results and acceptable morbidity with soft tissue debridement, prosthetic patch excision, and either patch angioplasty or interposition grafting with autologous vein.     

A systematic review of patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy

BackgroundGuidelines recommend routine patching after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) on the basis of a lower restenosis rate and presumed lower procedural stroke rate than with primary repair. Underlying evidence is based on studies performed decades ago with perioperative care that significantly differed from current standards. Recent studies raise doubt about routine patching and have suggested that a more selective approach to patch closure (PAC) might be noninferior for procedural safety and long-term stroke prevention. The objective was to review the literature on the procedural safety and perioperative stroke prevention of PAC compared with primary closure (PRC) after CEA.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from January 1966 to September 2017. Two authors independently performed the search, study selection, assessment of methodologic quality, and data extraction. Articles were eligible if they compared PAC and PRC after CEA, were published in English, included human studies, and had a full text available. Methodologic quality for nonrandomized studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score; randomized controlled trials were assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Nonrandomized studies with a score ≤15 were excluded. The primary outcome measure was 30-day stroke risk. Secondary outcome measures were long-term restenosis (>50%) and postoperative bleeding.ResultsTwenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria, 9 randomized studies and 20 nonrandomized studies, for a total of 12,696 patients and 13,219 CEAs. Overall 30-day stroke risk was higher in the PRC group (odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.9). After exclusion of nonrandomized studies, this difference was not statistically significant anymore (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.8-3.9). The restenosis rate was higher after PRC (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.4). There were no differences in bleeding complications. Methodologic quality of the nonrandomized studies was moderate, and seven were excluded. Quality of the evidence according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation was moderate for restenosis, 30-day stroke, and bleeding.ConclusionsIn this systematic review, on the basis of moderate-quality evidence, perioperative stroke rate was lower after PAC compared with PRC. The rate of restenosis was higher after PRC, although the clinical significance of this finding in terms of long-term stroke prevention remained unclear.     

An evaluation of external jugular vein patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy

Seventy-six patients had 91 internal carotid endarterectomies closed with patch angioplasty. There were 36 redo and 55 primary procedures. External jugular vein was used as the patch material in 38, facial vein in nine, Dacron in seven, polytetra flour ethylene (PTFE) in nine, and saphenous vein in 28 operations. There were no perioperative deaths. Five patients required reoperation, but only one required replacement of a defective facial vein. There were five postoperative strokes, but two were related to a contralateral occlusion. Two of the three ipsilateral strokes had a temporary indwelling shunt. Only one patient returned with recurrent neurologic symptoms. Five other restenoses of greater than 75 per cent were noted in three patients. One false aneurysm occurred three months after an external jugular vein patch angioplasty. External jugular vein, although requiring careful handling, is conveniently located in the operative field, does not appear to be associated with increased complications, has excellent long-term results, and allows preservation of the saphenous vein for other bypass surgery.     

Durability of eversion carotid endarterectomy: comparison with primary closure and carotid patch angioplasty

OBJECTIVES: Despite numerous studies in which various methods for arteriotomy closure after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have been addressed, the optimum surgical technique to reduce complications and late carotid restenosis has yet to be firmly established. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the results of the eversion CEA technique with those of conventional CEA with either primary closure or carotid patch angioplasty, and to determine under clinical conditions whether eversion CEA influences the results and restenosis rate.Patients and Methods: Over a 3-year period, 322 CEAs performed on 296 consecutive patients were concurrently evaluated. This study included 118 eversion CEAs, 97 CEAs with primary closure, and 107 CEAs with patch angioplasty. There were no differences in demographics, in surgical indications, or in the severity of carotid disease (not significant [NS]). The choice of CEA technique was not randomized because of technical considerations and surgeon preference. After entry into the protocol, no patients were excluded or withdrawn. Carotid restenosis was defined as a > 60% lumen reduction at the CEA site with established duplex ultrasonography criteria. RESULTS: The mean operative time for eversion CEA was 31 minutes, for CEA-primary closure it was 39 minutes, and for CEA-patch angioplasty it was 46 minutes (P <.01). The operative mortality rate for eversion CEA was 0.8% (1 patient), for CEA-primary closure it was 1.0% (1 patient), and for CEA-patch angioplasty it was 2.8% (3 patients) (NS). The postoperative stroke rate was 0.8% after eversion CEA, 1.0% after CEA-primary closure, and 2.8% after CEA-patch angioplasty (NS). The combined stroke and death rate in each group was thus 0.8% for eversion CEA (1 stroke-death), 1% for CEA with primary closure (1 stroke-death), and 5% for CEA with patch angioplasty (1 stroke-death, 2 fatal myocardial infarctions, and 2 nonfatal strokes) (NS). Transient ischemic attacks occurred in 2.5% after eversion CEA, in 5.2% after CEA-primary closure, and in 2.9% with CEA-patch angioplasty (NS). The mean clinical follow-up for all three groups was 23 months (range, 6-42 months) (NS). The restenosis rate was 1.7% after eversion CEA, 9.3% after CEA-primary closure, and 6.5% after CEA-patch angioplasty (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, nonrandomized clinical study indicates that eversion CEA is an effective surgical option comparable to conventional CEA with either primary arteriotomy closure or carotid patch angioplasty. No differences were found between eversion CEA and these more widely accepted CEA closure techniques with respect to operative morbidity and mortality. These data indicate, however, that eversion CEA has a lower restenosis rate than conventional CEA closure techniques and thus superior long-term durability.     

Processed bovine pericardium as patch angioplasty for carotid endarterectomy: a preliminary report

Although the routine use of a patch for closure of the arteriotomy after carotid endarterectomy is still debated, patch angioplasty is frequently used to avoid residual stenosis and to lower the incidence of later restenosis. Several materials are widely used for carotid patching, notably, autologous vein, Dacron and polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE). During recent years a heterologous stabilized graft made from bovine pericardium has been introduced. This paper reports the authors' experience of 52 carotid endarterectomies in which a patch of bovine pericardium was used to close the arteriotomy. The patients were followed with colour-duplex scanning over 12–30 months. This biograft did not require preclotting and proved to be easy to suture. Follow-up did not uncover any complications related to graft use. Although this is a preliminary report, it is concluded that bovine pericardium is a promising material for carotid patch angioplasty. Copyright © 1996 The International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery.     

Arterial digital subtraction angiography with particulate intravascular embolization and angioplasty

The authors are reporting their experience with arterial digital subtraction angiography to monitor particular intravascular embolization in hypervascular tumors and malformations and angioplasty. Arterial digital subtraction angiography may reduce the time of waiting for regular film developing and subtraction. The smaller amount of contrast material being used in arterial digital subtraction angiography minimizes the discomfort to the patients. It also prevents further renal damage in those patients with poor renal function. The arterial digital subtraction angiography may detect the early warning signs of embolotherapy. From the past experience, the authors have found that arterial digital subtraction angiography should be considered as a better alternative way to performing the particulate embolization and angioplasty than being monitored by conventional angiography.