Attenuation by pimozide of the suppressant effect of d-amphetamine on operant behaviour

The interaction between pimozide (a selective D₂-dopamine receptor antagonist) and d-amphetamine on the operant performance of rats maintained under variable-interval schedules of positive reinforcement was examined. In Experiment 1, eight rats responded under variable-interval 30-s and variable-interval 300-s. Pimozide (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 mg/kg) suppressed performance maintained under both schedules in a dose-dependent manner, the degrees of suppression being equivalent in the two schedules. In Experiment 2, 12 rats responded under the same schedules. d-Amphetamine (0.1–3.2 mg/kg) suppressed performance under both schedules, the degree of suppression being somewhat greater in the case of variable-interval 30-s. Pre-treatment with pimozide (0.0625, 0.125 mg/kg) significantly attenuated the suppressant effect of d-amphetamine under both schedules. It is suggested that D₂-dopamine receptors may be involved in mediating the suppressant effect of d-amphetamine on operant behaviour.     

The effect of d-amphetamine on operant behaviour maintained under variable-interval schedules of reinforcement

Dose-response curves were obtained for the effects of d-amphetamine sulphate (0.1–3.2 mg/kg) on the operant performance of rats in variable-interval 4-min and variableinterval 20-min schedules of reinforcement. Response rates maintained under variable-interval 4-min were suppressed in a dose-dependent manner. Response rates maintained under variable-interval 20-min schedules tended to be elevated by low doses and suppressed by higher doses. The degree of response rate suppression was greater in the case of the variable-interval 4-min schedule. The results are consistent with the previously reported effect of d-amphetamine on the values of the two constants of Herrnstein's (1970) equation: the drug reduces the reinforcement frequency needed to maintain the half-maximum response rates (K _h) and lowers the maximum response rate (R _max) (Bradshaw et al. 1981 b). It is suggested that the effects of d-amphetamine on operant performance may involve two processes: an enhancement of motivation and a reduction of the capacity to respond.     

DSP4 and Herrnstein's equation: further evidence for a role of noradrenaline in the maintenance of operant behaviour by positive reinforcement

The effect of the selective noradrenaline neurotoxin DSP4 on steady-state operant behaviour was examined using a quantitative behavioural paradigm based on Herrnstein's (1970) equation, which defines a hyperbolic relationship between steady-state response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules. Eleven rats received injections of DSP4 (two doses of 50 mg/kg, intraperitoneally), and 12 rats received injections of the vehicle alone. The rats were trained to steady state in a series of six variable-interval schedules of sucrose reinforcement, affording scheduled reinforcement frequencies of 4–360 reinforcers per hour. Herrnstein's equation was fitted to the data obtained from each rat and to the averaged data obtained from the two groups. The value ofK _H (the parameter expressing the reinforcement frequency needed to maintain the half-maximal response rate) was higher in the DSP4-treated rats than in the control rats; the value ofR _max (the parameter expressing the maximum response rate) did not differ significantly between the two groups. At the end of the behavioural experiment the rats were sacrificed for determination of the concentrations of catecholamines in the brain by high-performance liquid chromatography. The levels of noradrenaline in the parietal cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum of the DSP4-treated rats were less than 20% of those of the control rats. The results provide further evidence that central noradrenergic neurones are involved in the maintenance of operant behaviour by positive reinforcement.     

Interaction between antidepressants andd-amphetamine on variable-interval performance

Four experiments were carried out investigating the interactions between some antidepressant drugs (imipramine, desipramine, fluvoxamine, trazodone (4 and 8 mg/kg) andd-amphetamine (0.1–3.2 mg/kg) on operant behaviour maintained under a variable-interval 80-s schedule of sucrose reinforcement; each experiment employed 12 rats.d-Amphetamine exerted a dose-related suppressant effect on response rate. Imipramine and desipramine given alone had no effect on response rate, whereas fluvoxamine (both doses) and the higher dose of trazodone produced significant increases in response rate. Pretreatment with imipramine, desipramine or fluvoxamine significantly potentiated the suppressant effect ofd-amphetamine on responding; pretreatment with trazodone had no significant effect. The potentiating effect of imipramine and desipramine may be related to their well known uptake blocking actions. The fact that fluvoxamine, a selective inhibitor of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT) uptake, also potentiated the effect ofd-amphetamine suggests that the suppressant effect ofd-amphetamine on operant behaviour may involve 5HT as well as catecholamine release. The lack of effect of trazodone may reflect its failure to influence uptake mechanisms. On the basis of a formal model couched in terms of Herrnstein's (1970) equation, it is suggested that imipramine, desipramine and fluvoxamine may have enhancedd-amphetamine's ability to reduce response capacity; it is suggested that the data do not provide evidence for an interaction between the antidepressants and the putative motivation-enhancing effect ofd-amphetamine.     

Some behavioral effects of repeated d-amphetamine administrations

Effects of daily administrations of d-amphetamine were studied on key peck responses of pigeons maintained under a multiple fixed-interval 2-min, fixed-ratio 30-responseschedule. Under the fixed-interval schedule, a pause was followed by a transition to increasing rates of responding until food presentation. Under the fixed-ratio schedule, higher sustained rates of responding were maintained. Low to intermediate doses (0.3-1.0 mg/kg) of d-amphetamine changed the temporal patterns and occasionally increased rates of responding under the fixed-interval schedule. Higher doses decreased rates of responding under bothschedules. With daily injections of 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine prior to experimental sessions, the effects of this dose on rates and patterns of responding were attenuated, and d-anphetamine dose-effect curves were shifted to the right, primarily under the fixed-ratio schedule. Similar results were obtained with daily presession injections of 5.6 mg/kg d-amphetamine in a second group of pigeons, except that rates of responding under both schedules were decreased by this daily dose, and did not return completely to control values with repeated injections. In a third group of pigeons, 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine administered daily, after experimental sessions, did not alter dose-effect functions for d-amphetamine. In a second experiment, pigeons were trained to peck one response key when given 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine and a different key when given presession water injections. Increasing doses of d-amphetamine produced incresing percentages of d-amphetamine-key responses. Repeated administration of 5.6 mg/kg d-amphetamine shifted these dose-effect functions to the right one-half log unit. Results suggested that decreases in reinforcement frequency are not a necessary condition for the development of behavioral tolerance to d-amphetamine.     

Shifting of the d-amphetamine dose-response curve in rats with frontal cortical ablations

Rats trained to bar-press on a FI 15 sec schedule for water reinforcement were administered various doses of d-amphetamine (0.25–4.0 mg/kg) both before and 6–8 weeks after bilateral ablation of frontal cortex. Preoperatively, low doses (e.g. 0.25–0.5 mg/kg) of (d-amphetamine increased responding and high doses (e.g. 2.0–4.0 mg/kg) of d-amphetamine depressed responding. Postoperatively, frontal rats showed larger facilitatory effects in response to low doses of d-amphet-amine but lesser depressant effects in response to high doses of d-amphetamine; the whole dose-response curve was generally shifted higher by the frontal lesions. These results indicate that frontal lesions differentially influence mechanisms mediating two different actions of d-amphetamine.This research was supported by NIMH grant MH21156 and NIMH Research Scientist Development Award (Type 2) DA70082 to S. D. Glick.     

Blockage of progesterone-induced release of luteinizing hormone and prolactin byd-amphetamine and fenfluramine in rats

Subcutaneous administration ofd-amphetamine at various doses (1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg) decreased plasma luteinizing-hormone levels in ovariectomized rats primed with estradiol and injected with progesterone. In these animals prolactin levels decreased after injection of 0.6 and 1.25 mg/kg ofd-amphetamine. No significant hormone modifications were detected in ovariectomized and ovariectomized estradiol-primed rats after injection of 2.5 mg/kg ofd-amphetamine. Fenfluramine at doses of 25 mg/kg induced decreases of plasma LH and prolactin levels in ovariectomized estradiol-and progesterone-treated rats. A low dose of fenfluramine, 2.5 mg/kg, had no effect.It is concluded thatd-amphetamine and fenfluramine are able to alter the facilitatory actions of progesterone on luteinizing hormone and prolactin release in ovariectomized estradiol-primed rats.National Scientific Research Council of Argentina (CONICET) investigator     

Potentiation of startle response by d- and l-amphetamine: The possible involvement of pre- and postsynaptic alpha-adrenoreceptors and other transmitter systems in the modulation of a tactile startle response

The startle response to a metered puff of air was investigated in mice treated with d- and l-amphetamine and a range of drugs acting on central transmitter systems. d-Amphetamine produced a dose-related increase in startle response amplitude (SRA). l-Amphetamine was approximately twice as potent as d-amphetamine while apomorphine was without effect. Noradrenaline and alpha-methyl noradrenaline intracerebroventricularly (ICV), and clonidine IP, all tended to reduce control SRA but potentiated the effect of d-amphetamine. Apomorphine IP had no effect on control SRA or on the effect of d-amphetamine. Phenoxybenzamine, phentolamine and piperoxane reduced d-amphetamine potentiation at doses which had no significant effect on control SRA. Higher doses of phenoxybenzamine and phentolamine reduced control SRA. Yohimbine enhanced the effect of d-amphetamine but reduced control SRA. dl-Propranolol, d-propranolol and sotalol (MJ 1999) did not affect d-amphetamine potentiation. Pimozide was without effect on control SRA but caused a late potentiation of the effect of d-amphetamine. H44/68 and FLA 63 reduced d-amphetamine potentiation. Both 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) ICV and p-chlorophenylalanine potentiated the effect of d-amphetamine. The predominant effect of arecoline, physostigmine and carbachol was also to potentiate d-amphetamine. Atropine enhanced and hyoscine reduced d-amphetamine potentiation. The results are discussed in terms of involvement in the startle response of a noradrenergic synapse possessing receptors resembling peripheral pre- and postsynaptic alpha-adrenoreceptors. Cholinergic and 5-HT systems may also be involved.     

d-Amphetamine and punished responding: The role of catecholamines and anorexia

Rats were trained to press a lever for food on a schedule in which components of variable interval reinforcement (VI2) alternated with conflict components in which every response resulted in food delivery and footshock. Low doses of d-amphetamine selectively suppressed responding in the confliet component in a dose-dependent manner, whereas prefeeding suppressed responding in both components. Pretreatment with noradrenergic blocking agents (propranolol, phentolamine and phenoxybenzamine) did not diminish the suppressant effect of d-amphetamine, but this effect was reduced by pretreatment with alpha-methyl-para-tyrosine methylester and dopamine blockers (spiroperidol, haloperidol and clozapine) indicating that d-amphetamine was exerting its selective suppressant effect via the release of dopamine. It is suggested that the effects of low doses d-amphetamine on behaviour in conflict situations may provide a useful model for investigating the mode of action of neuroleptic drugs.     

Long-term l-Dopa pretreatment of mice: Central receptor subsensitivity or supersensitivity?

The effect of d-amphetamine added to the drinking water on the rate of conditioned lever pressing by rats was determined using fixed-ratio 30 (FR-30) and fixed-interval 2-min (FI-2) schedules of food presentation. After 32 days of gradual increase in drug concentration the average drug ingestion was 13 mg/kg/day. In tests with various doses of d-amphetamine injected before and after the chronic ingestion regimen, the rate-decreasing effects of d-amphetamine on FR responding were attenuated after chronic treatment, indicating development of a two- to three-fold tolerance. However, the rate-decreasing effect of d-amphetamine on FI responding was not altered by chronic ingestion. Since acute amphetamine treatment reduced the reinforcement frequency under the FR but not the FI schedule, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that a behavioral tolerance will develop most readily to drug effects that decrease the frequency of reinforcement. Upon removal of d-amphetamine from the drinking water there was some increase in the rate of FR responding, but no change in FI responding.     

Anticonflict effects of buspirone and chlordiazepoxide in pigeons under a concurrent schedule with punishment and a changeover response

A procedure was developed with pigeons to extend the experimental analysis of punished behavior and the effects of anxiolytic drugs. Under this procedure the completion of a fixed-ratio requirement on a changeover key switched between two variable-interval schedules of reinforcement that were programmed on a second response key. Under one schedule, correlated with a green keylight, key pecks produced only food; under the second schedule, correlated with a red keylight, key pecks produced both food and electric shock. Pigeons were switched into the component with shock if they did not enter that component within 5 min. Parameter values of the variable-interval schedules were manipulated systematically and the effects of two clinically active anxiolytic drugs, buspirone and chlordiazepoxide, were examined. Responding was suppressed during the component with shock (punishment) and, under non-drug conditions, pigeons infrequently switched into the punishment component; changeover responses occurred rapidly when switched into the punishment component. Both buspirone (0.1–3.0 mg/kg) and chlordiazepoxide (3.0–30 mg/kg) increased punished responding at doses that had little effect on unpunished responding;d-amphetamine (0.3–5.6 mg/kg), which was studied only under one parameter of the variable-interval schedule, produced greater decreases in rates of punished responding than in unpunished responding. Changeover responses were increased only moderately by the anxiolytic drugs when the punishment schedule was added to a 3-min variable-interval schedule and the alternate schedule was a 1-min variable-interval schedule without punishment; the amount of time spent in the punishment component, however, increased two-fold at the higher doses of chlordiazepoxide. When these conditions were reversed and punishment was added to the variable-interval 1-min schedule, time spent in the punishment component increased and changeover responses out of the punishment component decreased, particularly following chlordiazepoxide. Anxiolytic drugs appear to attenuate the aversiveness of stimuli correlated with punishment, but the degree of attenuation is controlled by other conditions prevailing in the presence of those stimuli.     

Inhibition of d-amphetamine-induced locomotor activity by injection of haloperidol into the nucleus accumbens of the rat

The effect of intracerebral administration of antagonists of dopamine and noradrenaline upon the locomotor stimulation induced by intraperitoneal injection of d-amphetamine sulfate in rats was investigated. Injection of low doses of the dopamine antagonist haloperidol (2.5 g and 5 g) bilaterally into the nucleus accumbens antagonized the locomotor stimulation following d-amphetamine. No significant inhibition was observed following administration of the alpha-adrenergic antagonist phentolamine or the beta-adrenergic antagonist propranolol into the nucleus accumbens. Injection of the same doses of haloperidol into the caudate nucleus did not inhibit the d-amphetamine induced locomotor activity, in contrast to the effects seen following injection into the nucleus accumbens.The results confirm the significance of dopaminergic mechanisms for the locomotor stimulant effect of d-amphetamine and indicate that the mesolimbic dopamine system plays an important role in this respect.     

d-Amphetamine and phencyclidine alone and in combination: Effects on fixed-ratio and interresponse-time-greater-than-t responding of rats

The effects of three doses of d-amphetamine (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg) and phencylidine (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg), alone and in combination, were assessed in rats performing under fixed-ratio 30 and interresponse-time-greater-than-15-sec food reinforcement schedules. When given alone, phencyclidine and d-amphetamine produced similar increases in responding under the interresponse-time-greater-than-t schedule, and decreases in responding under the fixed-ration 30 schedule. Each drug decreased the number of reinforcers (food pellets) earned relative to control values under both schedules. The effects of the two drugs in combination were nearly always less than additive. That is, the effects of a given dose of phencyclidine and d-amphetamine together were less than an arithmetic summation of the effects of the drugs given alone.     

Effects of stimulants,anorectics, and related drugs on schedule-controlled behavior

The effects of nine drugs were studied in rats responding under either fixed-ratio 30 (FR-30) or fixed-interval 2-min (FI-2) schedules of food presentation. All the drugs decreased average rates of responding under both schedules in a dose-related manner, with apomorphine and clonidine being the most potent and caffeine the least potent.d-Amphetamine was about three times more potent thanl-amphetamine in decreasing responding under the FR schedule, while the two isomers were equipotent in reducing the average response rates under the FI schedule. A 10 mg/kg dose of fenfluramine decreased responding for two to three days after administration, but this treatment did not produce long-lasting changes in control performance or in the effects of the serotonergic drugs quizapine andd-paramethoxyamphetamine. The effects of the drugs on the local rates of responding during the FI may be divided into three categories: (1) those drugs that increased low rates of responding and decreased high rates of responding (rate-dependent effects) at dosages that did not markedly decrease the average response rates (d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and cocaine); (2) those that produced rate-dependent effects only at dosages that markedly reduced average response rates (fenfluramine, quipazine, and clonidine); and (3) those that did not produce clear rate-dependent effects at any dose tested (l-amphetamine, apomorphine, and caffeine). These behavioral results are discussed in relation to their known biochemical effects on brain catecholamine and serotonin systems.     

Independence of the effects of d-amphetamine and food deprivation or body weight on the food consumption of rats

Two experiments studied the combined effects of absolute doses (milligrams per rat) of d-amphetamine with either food deprivation (Experiment I) or body weight (Experiment II) on the food consumption of rats. In the first experiment, each of 16 rats was tested once under every combination of three levels of food deprivation (0, 12, and 24 h) and three levels of drug (0, 0.33, and 1.0 mg per rat). Food consumption was measured over 2.5-h sessions that began 30 min after injection. Increasing doses of d-amphetamine and decreasing levels of food deprivation both decreased food consumption, but the effects of the two variables were additive with nonsignificant interaction.In the second experiment, four groups of four rats each, differing in age and body weight, were studied. Under 48-h food deprivation, each rat received each of four doses of d-amphetamine (0, 0.27, 0.54, and 0.81 mg). Food consumption was measured over a 2.5-h period that began 30 min after injection. Increasing doses of d-amphetamine and decreased body weights decreased food consumption, and the combined effects of these two variables were additive. The lack of an interaction between dose and differing body weights in these experiments indicates that the generally-accepted mode of administering d-amphetamine, as milligrams per kilograms of body weight, does not equate rats of differing body weights.This reserch was supported by USPHS reserch grant MH-01604 from the National Institutes of Mental Health. We thank Smith, Kline and French Laboratory for supplying the d-amphetamine used in this study. Robert C. MacPhail is now at the Department of Pharmacology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637.     

Effects of chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on schedule-controlled and schedule-related behavior of rabbits

A lever-lifting response by Dutch Belted and New Zealand White rabbits was maintained in water-deprived animals by 0.25% saccharin solution and in food-deprived animals by food pellets under a multiple 3-min fixed-interval (FI) 30-response fixed-ratio (FR) schedule. Rabbits responding for the saccharin solution had food freely available during the session and in the home cage, whereas those responding for pellets had water continuously available during the session as well as in the home cage. Under nondrug conditions the FR and FI schedules controlled different rates and patterns of responding in the rabbit that were characteristic of those found with other species. In addition, eating or drinking occurred during the inital portion of the FI under the saccharin solution and initial food presentation schedules, respectively. Doses of d-amphetamine (0.1–10.0 mg/kg) increased responding under the FI and FR schedules of food delivery, but increased only FI responding maintained by the saccharin solution. Doses of 3.0–10.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine produced extremely high (300–800% of control) rates of stereotyped perseverative lever responding. Schedule-related eating or drinking were unaffected or decreased at doses of d-amphetamine that increased schedule-controlled responding. Chlorpromazine (0.03–0.3 mg/kg) increased FI responding maintained both by saccharin and food, whereas FR responding generally was unaffected at these dose levels; eating but not drinking was increased with chlorpromazine. Since the behavioral effects of drugs such as amphetamine and chlorpromazine differ somewhat in the rabbit from those found with other typically studied nonhuman mammals, further studies with the rabbit may yield useful information for comparative behavioral pharmacology.     

Retarded acquisition of a temporal discrimination following destruction of noradrenergic neurones by systemic treatment with DSP4

This experiment examined the effect of destroying central noradrenergic neurones, using the selective neurotoxin DSP4 (N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine) on the acquisition and performance of discrimination between two time intervals. Rats that had received systemic treatment with DSP4 and vehicle-treated control rats were trained in a series of discrete trials to press lever A following a 2-s presentation of a light stimulus and lever B following an 8-s presentation of the same stimulus. Both groups acquired the discrimination (>90% correct choices) within 15 sessions; however, the DSP4-treated group showed significantly slower acquisition than the control group. When stable performance had been attained, probe trials were introduced in which the light was presented for intermediate durations. Both groups showed sigmoid functions relating percent choice of lever B to log stimulus duration. Neither the bisection point (duration corresponding to 50% choice of lever B) nor the Weber fraction differed significantly between the DSP4-treated and control groups. The levels of noradrenaline were markedly reduced in the neocortex and hippocampus of the DSP4-treated group, but the levels of dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine were not altered. The results indicate that noradrenaline depletion induced by DSP4 retarded the acquisition of temporal discrimination, but did not impair steady-state discriminative precision.     

Effects of d-amphetamine and ethanol alone and in combination on schedule-controlled responding of pigeons

Key pecking by pigeons was maintained under either a 5-min fixed-interval or a 30-response fixed-ratio schedule of food delivery. d-Amphetamine (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) either increased or did not affect overall rates of responding under the fixed-interval schedule; the lowest dose of ethanol (0.5 g/kg) did not affect or slightly decreased response rates, whereas higher doses (1.0–2.0 g/kg) substantially decreased rates. Combinations of low noneffective ethanol doses with most doses of d-amphetamine increased rates of responding under the fixed-interval schedule above those obtained with d-amphetamine alone; decreases produced by the higher doses of ethanol were attenuated by most doses of d-amphetamine. Doses of d-amphetamine (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) and ethanol (0.5–1.5 g/kg) alone generally had no effect on responding maintained under the fixed-ratio schedule; higher doses of these drugs decreased responding. The effects of dose combinations other than the highest ones generally differed little from those obtained with ethanol alone; the effects of high doses of each drug were antagonized by low to moderate doses of the other. Combinations of ethanol with d-amphetamine can result in higher rates of responding than are obtained with either drug alone. Further, effects of the drugs alone and in combination depend on the schedule under which behavior is maintained.     

Differential effects of methylphenidate and d-amphetamine on stereotyped behavior in the rat

Different equimolar doses of d-amphetamine and methylphenidate were compared for their potency in eliciting stereotyped behavior in rats. Although at lower doses d-amphetamine appeared more effective in causing stereotyped gnawing, repetitive body movements, and sniffing, at higher doses methylphenidate at certain times caused a greater incidence of gnawing than did d-amphetamine. Understanding these differences and comparing related biochemical correlates may lead to a better definition of mechanisms underlying psychostimulant effects.     

Dose-response effects of d-amphetamine on passive avoidance learning in the rat

Trials and errors to learning a passive avoidance response were assessed in 63 albino rats injected subcutaneously with d-amphetamine, in amounts ranging from 0–7 mg/kg body weight. Both measures indicated dose-response effects on responding; animals under either low or high doses of d-amphetamine made significantly less errors and took significantly fewer trials to learn the response than did middle dosage animals. The scores of the lower and higher dosage animals did not differ from the nondrug control group. Results are discussed in terms of amphetamine stereotypy.