Pediatric endocanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy: results of a minimally invasive surgical technique

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of endocanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), which is a minimally invasive surgical technique, in pediatric patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). A retrospective study was carried out on patients treated between October 2008 and August 2009 for nasolacrimal duct obstruction with an endocanalicular diode laser procedure. Patients diagnosed as having nasolacrimal duct obstruction were included in this study and an endocanalicular diode laser procedure was performed. The main outcome measures were patients’ previous treatments, clinical presentation, operative and postoperative complications, postoperative follow-up and resolution of epiphora. Eighteen children (10 girls, 8 boys) with a mean age of 6.11 ± 2.08 years (range, 4–10) underwent 20 endocanalicular laser DCR operations for congenital NLDO. In all eyes (100%), there was a history of epiphora and chronic dacryocystitis; two (10%) presented with acute dacryocystitis. Previous procedures included probing and irrigation of all eyes (100%) and silicone tube intubation in nine eyes (45%). None of the patients underwent any previous DCR operations. During a mean postoperative follow-up period of 20.50 ± 3.24 months (range, 14–24 months), the anatomical success rate (patency of ostium on nasal endoscopy) was 100%, and the clinical success rate (resolution of epiphora) was 85%. Endocanalicular diode laser DCR is an effective treatment modality for pediatric patients with congenital NLDO that compares favorably with the reported success rates of external and endoscopic endonasal DCR. Moreover, it has an added advantage of shorter operative time, less morbidity and avoidance of overnight admission.     

Outcomes of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy after maxillectomy in patients with paranasal sinus and skull base tumors

Maxillectomy followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy can result in lacrimal blockage and the need for subsequent dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Endonasal endoscopic DCR, as opposed to external DCR, allows better accuracy and leaves no scar. To date no report was published regarding the results of endoscopic DCR in these patients. The current study presents a retrospective review of all patients with paranasal and skull base tumors who developed nasolacrimal duct blockage after ablative maxillectomy with or without radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy and underwent endonasal endoscopic DCR between January 2006 and October 2012 in a tertiary reference medical center. According to our results, ten patients underwent 11 subsequent endonasal endoscopic DCR. There were 6 men and 4 women with a median age of 55 years (range, 19–81 years); four suffered from benign tumors and six had malignant tumors. All underwent maxillectomy. Six received high-dose radiotherapy. Time interval between primary ablative surgery and endonasal endoscopic DCR was 18 months (range, 7–118 months). Silicone stents were removed after median period of 11 weeks (range, 1–57 weeks). Nine out of ten patients experienced symptomatic improvement following one endonasal endoscopic DCR. One patient had recurrent epiphora and underwent a successful endonasal endoscopic revision DCR. In conclusion, endonasal endoscopic DCR in patients with paranasal and skull base tumors, who previously underwent maxillectomy, is generally successful and not associated with a high rate of complications or failure. Moreover, our findings may suggest that silicone stents can be removed shortly after the operation with high success rate.     

Outcomes of posterior lacrimal sac approach in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: review of 35 cases

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe the posterior lacrimal sac approach in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) performed at our institute and report perioperative results achieved with this procedure. METHODS: A prospective clinical study was performed of 35 adult patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction who underwent posterior lacrimal sac approach DCR from March 1998 to May 2005. Follow-up period ranged from 13 to 30 months (average, 17.5 months; SD, 6.8 months). "Surgical success" was defined as complete relief of epiphora and patent surgical ostium on endoscopic assessment. RESULTS: Surgical success was achieved in 30/35 (85.7%) patients after the primary surgery. Of 5 unsuccessful patients who complained of occasional epiphora, 4 patients had formed stenosis and 1 patient had granulation around the surgical opening, and all had revision surgery. Four of 5 (80.0%) patients achieved surgical success. Thus, including the result of revision surgery, 34/35 (97.1%) patients were successful. CONCLUSION: Posterior lacrimal sac approach in endoscopic DCR has several advantages: good sac accessibility, a low complication rate, and a relatively high success rate. Therefore, the posterior lacrimal sac approach appears to offer a useful alternative approach for the surgical treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction.     

Paediatric powered endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy

Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is indicated in children with persistent nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). Endoscopic endonasal DCR has been successfully performed in both adults and children, with success rates similar to that of external DCR. This paper aims to evaluate the outcomes of paediatric patients undergoing endonasal endoscopic DCR at a district general hospital. A retrospective review of all patients attending a joint lacrimal clinic undergoing endonasal endoscopic DCR between October 2001 and December 2008 was performed. Sixteen children (17 eyes) aged between 2 and 14 were analysed. The main outcome measure was resolution of symptoms. Fourteen cases (82%) presented with epiphora with or without stickiness. Three cases had recurrent dacryocystitis. Three patients had Down syndrome. There were no operative complications. During a mean post-operative period of 12 months, all but one case showed an improvement of symptoms. While 60% of the patients had a complete resolution of symptoms, the remaining were minimally symptomatic. Of those with residual symptoms, two had Down syndrome. Endonasal DCR is a safe and effective intervention for children with persistent NLDO. Success is higher in children with no craniofacial abnormality. Joint care under a consultant Oculoplastic and ENT surgeon provides optimum care for these patients.     

Outcomes after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without mucosal flap preservation

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) without the preservation of mucosal flaps for the management of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing endoscopic DCR without mucosal flap preservation from May 2003 to October 2006 at a tertiary referral medical center. Twenty-seven procedures were performed on 20 patients with epiphora secondary to acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Main outcome measures were subjective improvement in epiphora and assessment of anatomic patency based on lacrimal irrigation. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 16 months. Mild intermittent postoperative epiphora or complete resolution of epiphora was noted in 100% (27/27) of procedures; complete resolution was recorded in 93% (25/27) of procedures. Eighteen patients (25 procedures) were available for lacrimal irrigation at a mean of 16 months follow-up. Anatomic patency was confirmed in 100% (25/25) of procedures. CONCLUSION: Our results with endoscopic DCR are comparable with previously published outcomes. These data suggest that successfully powered DCR may be performed without the preservation of mucosal flaps.     

Pediatric Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy Failures: Who and Why?

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study are to report outcomes of pediatric patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) who underwent primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and discuss causes of failure. STUDY DESIGN: The authors conducted a retrospective case series. METHODS: Charts of all patients less than 16 years of age who underwent primary endoscopic DCR from 1997 to 2004 were reviewed. Patients were grouped based on the presence or absence of facial anomalies or syndromes and whether the NLDO was congenital or acquired. Success was defined as complete resolution of symptoms, improvement included anatomic patency or partial symptoms, and failure as no improvement or demonstration of patency. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (43 ducts) aged 11 months to 14 years were identified. There were 17 males and 17 females. Follow up ranged from 2 to 54 months (average, 21 months). Twenty-four patients (29 ducts) had congenital NLDO, seven patients (11 ducts) had congenital syndromes associated with craniofacial abnormalities, and three patients (three ducts) had acquired NLDO. In patients with congenital NLDO without craniofacial abnormalities or syndromes, 22 of 29 eyes (76%) were cured with another three (10%) showing improvement. Only one of 11 (9%) eyes of patients with congenital craniofacial abnormality or syndrome experienced complete resolution and only four of 11 (36%) eyes showed improvement. Of the patients with acquired NLDO, two of three (67%) of the eyes were cured and one (33%) improved. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic DCR is safe and effective for most children, although patients with craniofacial abnormalities or syndromes are extremely difficult to cure.     

Manometric measurement of lacrimal sac pressure after endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) using a quantitative, objective functional tool. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study comprised 58 cases divided into 4 groups: healthy controls; patients suffering from epiphora due to nasolacrimal duct (NLD) obstruction; patients who had undergone endoscopic DCR; and patients who had undergone external DCR. The lacrimal sac pressure was measured during blinking, forced blinking and the Valsalva maneuver using a polygraph. RESULTS: Negative pressure was detected during blinking and forced blinking in all normal subjects and in most patients who had successfully undergone DCR. In contrast, positive pressure was detected in cases with epiphora and patients in whom DCR had failed. Negative pressure was higher after endoscopic than external DCR. During the Valsalva maneuver there were no pressure changes in normal cases and patients with epiphora. In contrast, positive pressure was detected after all of the successful procedures (being higher after external than endoscopic DCR) and in most of the patients in whom external DCR failed. CONCLUSIONS: In normal subjects, negative pressure is created during blinking. In cases with epiphora due to NLD obstruction, the lacrimal pump is affected but its function is restored after successful DCR. The suction power of the pump mechanism is more effective after endoscopic than external DCR.     

Anastomosis of nasal mucosal and lacrimal sac flaps in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a well-established alternative to external approaches in the treatment of nasolacrimal canal obstruction. From July 2004 to December 2008, 92 endoscopic DCRs were performed on 88 patients at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan. All patients were affected by chronic dacryocystitis with epiphora. Preoperative work-up included Jones tests, lacrimal pathways irrigation, nasal endoscopy, and imaging evaluation by computed tomography. The technique involved anastomosis of nasal mucosal, lacrimal sac flaps and a large bony ostium. A silicone tube was inserted in all patients that remained for a period of 3 months. The first endoscopic intervention was successful in 91.30% of patients. After a second revision endoscopic DCR, the overall success rate raised to 95.65%. Anastomosis of nasal mucosal between lacrimal sac flaps plays a key role in endoscopic DCR with a high success rate both in primary nasolacrimal obstructions and in revision cases.     

Manometric Measurement of Lacrimal Sac Pressure after Endoscopic and External Dacryocystorhinostomy

Objective—To evaluate endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) using a quantitative, objective functional tool. Material and methods—This study comprised 58 cases divided into 4 groups: healthy controls; patients suffering from epiphora due to nasolacrimal duct (NLD) obstruction; patients who had undergone endoscopic DCR; and patients who had undergone external DCR. The lacrimal sac pressure was measured during blinking, forced blinking and the Valsalva maneuver using a polygraph. Results—Negative pressure was detected during blinking and forced blinking in all normal subjects and in most patients who had successfully undergone DCR. In contrast, positive pressure was detected in cases with epiphora and patients in whom DCR had failed. Negative pressure was higher after endoscopic than external DCR. During the Valsalva maneuver there were no pressure changes in normal cases and patients with epiphora. In contrast, positive pressure was detected after all of the successful procedures (being higher after external than endoscopic DCR) and in most of the patients in whom external DCR failed. Conclusions—In normal subjects, negative pressure is created during blinking. In cases with epiphora due to NLD obstruction, the lacrimal pump is affected but its function is restored after successful DCR. The suction power of the pump mechanism is more effective after endoscopic than external DCR.     

Endonasal flap suture-dacryocystorhinostomy (eFS-DCR): a new surgical technique for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO)

Conclusion: Endonasal flap suture-dacryocystorhinostomy (eFS- DCR) is a new and valuable technique for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). This technique could improve the success rate of endonasal DCR in comparison to external DCR. Objective: The standard procedure for NLDO is DCR. DCR can be performed via either an external or endonasal approach. External DCR is now regarded as the gold standard in the treatment of NLDO because of its higher success rate. However, we report a new endonasal surgical technique, eFS-DCR, and assess its efficacy by comparison with the standard endonasal DCR. Methods: We prospectively investigated a series of 62 consecutive patients with NLDO undergoing endonasal DCR. There were two surgical intervention groups: group 1 (24 patients, 28 sites) undergoing endonasal DCR without eFS; and group 2 (38 patients, 47 sites) undergoing eFS-DCR. Study end points were success rate, the ostium diameter (OD) of the lacrimal sac after DCR, and the duration of stent placement. We compared the two groups on these three points. Results: The success rate was 78.6% (22 of 28 sites) for group 1 (DCR without eFS) and 97.9% (46 of 47 sites) for group 2 (eFS-DCR). The ostium size in patients in group 2 was larger than that in group 1. The median time for the duration of stent placement was 42.5 days for group 1 and 31.5 days for group 2. There was a statistical difference (p < 0.01) in all these parameters between the two groups.     

Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy

Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) enables an obstructed lacrimal sac to be opened through an intranasal approach, avoiding the need for a skin incision. The holmiumtyttrium aluminum garnet (holmium:YAG) laser is well-suited for this procedure because of its properties of fiberoptic delivery, effective bone cutting, and precise soft-tissue coagulation. Efficient bone ablation is particularly important for primary DCR which requires removal of relatively thick bone along the lateral nasal wall to expose the lacrimal sac. Forty-six endoscopic laser DCRs were performed on 40 patients. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The surgery successfully relieved lacrimal obstruction in 85% of patients. Endoscopic instrumentation allowed for the rapid identification and correction of intranasal causes of DCR failure, including ethmoid sinus disease and middle turbinate hypertrophy. Endoscopic laser DCR appears to be a safe and effective procedure which should be considered as an alternative to external DCR for the surgical treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction.     

Endoscopic terminal dacryocystorhinostomy

OBJECTIVE: Traditional endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) involves creation of a lacrimal sac side hole that may close down in the presence of a partially patent lower lacrimal drainage system. Endoscopic terminal DCR is a modified DCR procedure designed to prevent this problem. METHODS: From September 1996 to June 1999, 16 patients (17 sides) had endoscopic terminal DCR that involved resection of the lacrimal sac-duct junction to achieve total separation of the lacrimal sac from the nasolarcrimal duct and creation of a terminal DCR opening. RESULTS: Ten of the 17 DCRs were primary and 7 were revisions. The follow-up ranged from 3 to 36 months. There were two failures. One failure was due to canalicular obstruction and the other was due to prolapse of orbital fat hindering proper fashioning of the mucosal flap. The overall success rate was 88%. CONCLUSIONS: Instead of creating a side hole in the lacrimal sac as proposed by most endoscopic DCR studies, we advocate total diversion of tear flow by performing a terminal DCR opening that would further improve the success rate of endoscopic DCR, particularly in cases of idiopathic and partial obstruction.     

Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in children -- analysis of 18 patients

OBJECTIVE: To describe the technique and results of primary endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in children with nasolacrimal duct blockage and review of literature with comparison of the results in adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out between the months of January 2002 to December 2004, which included 18 patients. Patients diagnosed as having only nasolacrimal duct obstruction were included in this study and an endonasal endoscopic procedure was performed. RESULTS: Eighteen children underwent endoscopic the DCR procedure. There were 5 males (27.7%) and 13 females (72.3%) with the maximum incidence between the age group of 4-7 years (age ranging from 10 months to 11.2 years). The follow up period ranged from 6 to 19 months average being 8.2 months. Relief of symptoms and endoscopic visualization of the patent stoma made into the lacrimal sac with sac syringing determined a successful outcome. Seventeen patients (94.4%) fulfilled the criteria. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that endonasal endoscopic DCR without stenting offers the same success rates for primary surgery over external DCR as have been established in adults. Moreover, it has an added advantage of shorter operative time, less morbidity and avoidance of stent related complications.     

泪囊在鼻内镜泪囊鼻腔造口术中的解剖学研究及临床应用

目的 探讨经鼻内镜泪囊鼻腔造口术中泪囊在鼻腔外侧壁的解剖学定位.方法 对12具(24侧)成人尸头的泪囊在鼻腔外侧壁上的投影位置进行解剖学测量,为62例(85侧)慢性泪囊炎鼻泪管阻塞患者行经鼻内镜鼻腔泪囊造口术.结果 解剖学测量结果提示,15侧(62.5%)泪囊上界位于中鼻甲腋上方,9侧(37.5%)泪囊上界位于中鼻甲腋下方.临床结果:62例(85侧)术后随访6个月以上,治愈50例(70侧,82.3% ),好转8例(9侧,10.6%),无效4例(6侧,7.1%),总有效率为92.9%.结论 以中鼻甲腋前上0.7 cm为上界,腋前下0.3 cm为下界,钩突前缘向上延线为泪囊后界定位泪囊进行鼻腔泪囊造口为较佳选择.     

Review of the basic methods of surgical treatment of lacrimal duct stenosis

Nasolacrimal duct obstruction is a common condition in patients who visit otolaryngologists and ophtalmologists. The patients complain of epiphora and blurred vision. Reconstruction of lacrimal drainage provides great improvement in a patient's quality of life. On the base of the world literature and the own experience, several surgical techniques of the lacrimal system are presented and analyzed regarding indications and results: dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), canaliculodacryocystorhinostomy (CanDCR), con-junctivodacryocystorhinostomy (ConDCR) and intubation. External DCR usually involves extensive removal of bone at the lacrimal fossa and hence risks disruption of the lacrimal pump mechanism. The development of endonasal microsurgery (endoscope, microscope) have awakened interest in an internal DCR in treatment nasolacrimal obstruction. Endonasal microscopic dacryocystorhinostomy become an important alternative to the classical external DCR. This method preserves intact the normal function of the lacrimal pump, yields cosmetic excellent results and allows at the same time management of the concomitant sino-nasal pathology.     

Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results and the factors influencing the success in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction treated with intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and silicone tube intubation (STI). We prospectively investigated 158 patients with lacrimal obstruction in two groups, one of which comprised 108 patients treated primarily with intranasal endoscopic DCR by experienced surgeons and the other comprised 50 patients who were operated on by inexperienced surgeons. In a mean follow-up time of 49 months the surgical success was 94.4% in experienced hands and 58.0% in inexperienced hands. The endoscopic examination of six patients with failure in the first group revealed granulation tissue around the tube in four, atonic sac in one and persistence of bone that was supposed to have been excised in the nasal cavity in one. There were 21 failures out of 50 patients in the second group: granulation tissue in 2 cases, fenestration to the nasolacrimal duct instead of the sac in 6 cases, synechia between the lateral nasal wall and the middle turbinate in 2 cases, bony spicles causing obstruction in 5 cases and fenestration anterior to the sac in 2 cases. In 4 cases no reasons were found for failure, but perhaps the small fenestration and failure to remove the medial half of the membranous sac wall was the reason. DCR and STI can be performed for primary treatment in lacrimal obstruction. There is a learning curve for the operation. False localization of the lacrimal sac, granulation tissue formation around the tubes, retained bony spicles, inadequate removal of the medial wall of the sac and the synechia between the lateral wall and the middle turbinate are the most common causes of failure.     

Long-term Results and Reasons for Failure of Intranasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results and the factors influencing the success in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction treated with intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and silicone tube intubation (STI). We prospectively investigated 158 patients with lacrimal obstruction in two groups, one of which comprised 108 patients treated primarily with intranasal endoscopic DCR by experienced surgeons and the other comprised 50 patients who were operated on by inexperienced surgeons. In a mean follow-up time of 49 months the surgical success was 94.4% in experienced hands and 58.0% in inexperienced hands. The endoscopic examination of six patients with failure in the first group revealed granulation tissue around the tube in four, atonic sac in one and persistence of bone that was supposed to have been excised in the nasal cavity in one. There were 21 failures out of 50 patients in the second group: granulation tissue in 2 cases, fenestration to the nasolacrimal duct instead of the sac in 6 cases, synechia between the lateral nasal wall and the middle turbinate in 2 cases, bony spicles causing obstruction in 5 cases and fenestration anterior to the sac in 2 cases. In 4 cases no reasons were found for failure, but perhaps the small fenestration and failure to remove the medial half of the membranous sac wall was the reason. DCR and STI can be performed for primary treatment in lacrimal obstruction. There is a learning curve for the operation. False localization of the lacrimal sac, granulation tissue formation around the tubes, retained bony spicles, inadequate removal of the medial wall of the sac and the synechia between the lateral wall and the middle turbinate are the most common causes of failure.     

Otologic T-tube in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a new approach

CONCLUSION: Otologic T-tubes had a success rate of 73% if implanted during endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). We suggest that they can be used successfully in endoscopic DCR, and are promising as an alternative to silicone stent intubations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic DCR using otologic T-tube. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients (22 eyes) with nasolacrimal duct obstruction underwent endoscopic DCR. After creating an aperture in the medial wall of the lacrimal sac, the otologic T-tube (1.15 mm diameter, Invotec, Jacksonville, FL, USA) was inserted into the sac transnasally. The T-tube was left in the lacrimal sac for between 3 and 6 months. The patients were followed up for between 6 and 24 months (mean 12.4 months). The improvement in patients' epiphora complaint was grouped as very good, good, or no change. RESULTS: Eleven eyes (50%) proved to be 'very good', whereas five eyes (23%) were good, and six eyes (27%) had no change. Of six eyes that were reported to have no change after the operation, three experienced spontaneous tube loss in the early period, one eye was a recurrent case, and the other two were primary cases.     

The Surgical Outcome of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy According to the Obstruction Levels of Lacrimal Drainage System

Objectives

Many factors influence the outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). One of the most important prognostic factors is the level of obstruction in the lacrimal drainage system. The main objective of this report is to evaluate both the frequency of obstruction by anatomical region of the lacrimal drainage system on dacryocystography (DCG) and the surgical outcome of endoscopic DCR according to the obstruction level.

Methods

A retrospective series of 48 patients (60 eyes) who had undergone endoscopic DCR from January 2005 to November 2007 were enrolled. Preoperative evaluation consisted of a standard examination which included lacrimal irrigation, probing, DCG and osteomeatal unit (OMU) computed tomography. Patients were classified into four groups according to the obstruction level on DCG. Surgical outcome was evaluated postoperatively by subjective improvement of epiphora and patent rhinostomy opening on nasal endoscopic exam.

Results

Of 60 eyes, the levels of obstruction were the common canaliculus in 14 eyes (23.3%), the lacrimal sac in 13 eyes (21.7%), the duct-sac junction in 13 eyes (21.7%) and the nasolacrimal duct (NLD) in 20 eyes (33.3%). The ductsac junction obstruction was treated most successfully (100%), followed by NLD obstruction (90%), common canaliculus obstruction (78.6%) and saccal obstruction (69.2%).

Conclusion

In patients with lacrimal drainage system obstruction, preoperative evaluation of obstruction level using DCG may be helpful for predicting the surgical outcome of endoscopic DCR. The saccal obstruction may have a worse prognosis than the other obstruction levels.     

泪囊CT造影研究

目的:探讨鼻内窥镜下泪囊鼻内造口术前泪囊CT造影的意义。方法:10例(20侧)健康志愿者、12例(24侧)慢性泪囊炎患者术前均进行了泪囊CT轴位及冠状位造影检查。结果:根据筛窦气化程度不同,将泪囊与筛窦的解剖关系分三种类型:Ⅰ型为前组筛窦前界位于泪后嵴之后,Ⅱ型为前组筛窦气化达泪颌缝,Ⅲ型为前组筛窦前端超过泪颌缝达泪前嵴,在轴位层面观察结果为Ⅰ型12侧(27.3％)、Ⅱ型18侧(40.9％)、Ⅲ型14侧(31.8％);12例患者冠状层面观察泪道阻塞部位均为泪囊与鼻泪管的移行处,11例泪囊形态正常或扩大,1例双侧泪囊瘢痕挛缩。结论:术前泪囊CT造影检查对鼻内窥镜下泪囊鼻内造口术中选择适当造口位置具有重要指导意义。