An in vivo study of nanorod,nanosphere, and nanowire forms of titanium dioxide using Drosophila melanogaster: toxicity,cellular uptake,oxidative stress,and DNA damage

ABSTRACT

The biological impact of nanomaterials (NMs) is determined by several factors such as size and shape, which need to be taken into consideration in any type of analysis. While investigators often prefer to conduct in vitro studies for detection of any possible adverse effects of NMs, in vivo approaches yield more relevant data for risk assessment. For this reason, Drosophila melanogaster was selected as a suitable in vivo model to characterize the potential risks associated with exposure nanorods (NRs), nanospheres (NSs), nanowires (NWs) forms of titanium dioxide (TiO₂), and their microparticulated (or bulk) form, as TiO₂. Third instar larvae (72 hr old larvae) were fed with TiO₂ (NRs, NSs, or NWs) and TiO₂ at concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 10 mM. Viability (toxicity), internalization (cellular uptake), intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and genotoxicity (Comet assay) were the end-points evaluated in hemocyte D. melanogaster larvae. Significant intracellular oxidative stress and genotoxicity were noted at the highest exposure concentration (10 mM) of TiO₂ (NRs, NSs, or NWs), as determined by the Comet assay and ROS analysis, respectively. A concentration–effect relationship was observed in hemocytes exposed to the NMs. Data demonstrated that selected forms of TiO₂.-induced genotoxicity in D. melanogaster larvae hemocytes indicating this organism is susceptible for use as a model to examine in vivo NMs-mediated effects.     

The potential health challenges of TiO2 nanomaterials

Titanium dioxide (TiO₂) nanomaterials (NMs) have found widespread applications owing to their attractive physical and chemical properties. As a result, the potential adverse impacts of nano‐TiO₂ exposure on humans have become a matter of concern. This review presents the state‐of‐the‐art advances on the investigations of the adverse effects of NMs, including the potential exposure routes of nano‐TiO₂ (e.g. respiratory system, skin absorption and digestive system), the physico‐chemical characterizations of nano‐TiO₂ (e.g. crystal structure, shape,size, zeta potential, treatment media, aggregation and agglomeration tendency, surface characteristics and coatings), risk evaluation of nanotoxicity (e.g. cytotoxicity, ecotoxicity, phototoxicity, and phytotoxicity) and potential mechanisms of adverse effects (e.g. generation of reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress and organelle dysfunction). The review aims to facilitate scientific assessments of health risks to nano‐TiO₂, which would guide the safe applications of NMs in our daily life. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Multilaboratory evaluation of 15 bioassays for (eco)toxicity screening and hazard ranking of engineered nanomaterials: FP7 project NANOVALID

Within EU FP7 project NANOVALID, the (eco)toxicity of 7 well-characterized engineered nanomaterials (NMs) was evaluated by 15 bioassays in 4 laboratories. The highest tested nominal concentration of NMs was 100?mg/l. The panel of the bioassays yielded the following toxicity order: Ag?>?ZnO?>?CuO?>?TiO_2?>_?MWCNTs?>?SiO_2?>_?Au. Ag, ZnO and CuO proved very toxic in the majority of assays, assumingly due to dissolution. The latter was supported by the parallel analysis of the toxicity of respective soluble metal salts. The most sensitive tests/species were Daphnia magna (towards Ag NMs, 24-h EC_50?=_?0.003?mg Ag/l), algae Raphidocelis subcapitata (ZnO and CuO, 72-h EC_50?=_?0.14?mg Zn/l and 0.7?mg Cu/l, respectively) and murine fibroblasts BALB/3T3 (CuO, 48-h EC_50?=_?0.7?mg Cu/l). MWCNTs showed toxicity only towards rat alveolar macrophages (EC_50?=_?15.3?mg/l) assumingly due to high aspect ratio and TiO₂ towards R. subcapitata (EC_50?=_?6.8?mg Ti/l) due to agglomeration of TiO₂ and entrapment of algal cells. Finally, we constructed a decision tree to select the bioassays for hazard ranking of NMs. For NM testing, we recommend a multitrophic suite of 4 in vitro (eco)toxicity assays: 48-h D. magna immobilization (OECD202), 72-h R. subcapitata growth inhibition (OECD201), 30-min Vibrio fischeri bioluminescence inhibition (ISO2010) and 48-h murine fibroblast BALB/3T3 neutral red uptake in vitro (OECD129) representing crustaceans, algae, bacteria and mammalian cells, respectively. Notably, our results showed that these assays, standardized for toxicity evaluation of “regular” chemicals, proved efficient also for shortlisting of hazardous NMs. Additional assays are recommended for immunotoxicity evaluation of high aspect ratio NMs (such as MWCNTs).     

Applicability of rat precision-cut lung slices in evaluating nanomaterial cytotoxicity,apoptosis, oxidative stress,and inflammation

The applicability of rat precision-cut lung slices (PCLuS) in detecting nanomaterial (NM) toxicity to the respiratory tract was investigated evaluating sixteen OECD reference NMs (TiO₂, ZnO, CeO₂, SiO₂, Ag, multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)). Upon 24-hour test substance exposure, the PCLuS system was able to detect early events of NM toxicity: total protein, reduction in mitochondrial activity, caspase-3/-7 activation, glutathione depletion/increase, cytokine induction, and histopathological evaluation. Ion shedding NMS (ZnO and Ag) induced severe tissue destruction detected by the loss of total protein. Two anatase TiO₂ NMs, CeO₂ NMs, and two MWCNT caused significant (determined by trend analysis) cytotoxicity in the WST-1 assay. At non-cytotoxic concentrations, different TiO₂ NMs and one MWCNT increased GSH levels, presumably a defense response to reactive oxygen species, and these substances further induced a variety of cytokines. One of the SiO₂ NMs increased caspase-3/-7 activities at non-cytotoxic levels, and one rutile TiO₂ only induced cytokines. Investigating these effects is, however, not sufficient to predict apical effects found in vivo. Reproducibility of test substance measurements was not fully satisfactory, especially in the GSH and cytokine assays. Effects were frequently observed in negative controls pointing to tissue slice vulnerability even though prepared and handled with utmost care. Comparisons of the effects observed in the PCLuS to in vivo effects reveal some concordances for the metal oxide NMs, but less so for the MWCNT. The highest effective dosages, however, exceeded those reported for rat short-term inhalation studies. To become applicable for NM testing, the PCLuS system requires test protocol optimization.     

Endothelial cell activation,oxidative stress and inflammation induced by a panel of metal-based nanomaterials

Abstract

The importance of composition, size, crystal structure, charge and coating of metal-based nanomaterials (NMs) were evaluated in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and/or THP-1 monocytic cells. Biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation were assessed because they are important in the development of cardiovascular diseases. The NMs used were five TiO₂ NMs with different charge, size and crystal structure, coated and uncoated ZnO NMs and Ag which were tested in a wide concentration range. There were major differences between the types of NMs; exposure to ZnO and Ag resulted in cytotoxicity and increased gene expression levels of HMOX1 and IL8. The intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1(VCAM-1) expression were highest in TiO₂ NM-exposed cells. There was increased adhesion of THP-1 monocytic cells onto HUVECs with Ag exposure. None of the NMs increased the intracellular ROS production. There were no major effects of the coating of ZnO NMs. The TiO₂ NMs data on ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expression suggested that the anatase form was more potent than the rutile form. In addition, the larger TiO₂ NM was more potent than the smaller for gene expression and ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expression. The toxicological profile of cardiovascular disease-relevant biomarkers depended on composition, size and crystal structure of TiO₂ NMs, whereas the charge on TiO₂ NMs and the coating of ZnO NMs were not associated with differences in toxicological profile.     

Assessment of the in vitro genotoxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles in a regulatory context

A review of in vitro genotoxicity studies on titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO₂-NPs) published between 2010 and 2016 was performed by France in the framework of the CLP Regulation 1272/2008/EC. Neither the few in vivo studies of low quality nor the larger number of acceptable in vitro studies available for genotoxicity allowed France to conclude on the genotoxicity of TiO₂-NPs. Based on this work, it was decided to compare the acceptable in vitro studies to understand the reasons for the diverging results observed, such as the materials tested or of the protocols used and their inherent interferences. The systematic review performed on in vitro genotoxicity data for TiO₂-NPs was then restricted to studies with the highest level of confidence among studies following OECD guidelines and the largely applied comet assay. Indeed, the aim of this article is to understand why, even if judged of good quality, the 36 publications selected and analyzed did not lead to a clear picture. Some recommendations to be taken into account before performing new in vitro genotoxicity assays for insoluble particles such as TiO₂-NPs are proposed. Although secondary genotoxic effects consequent to oxidative stress seem to be the major mechanism responsible for the genotoxicity of TiO₂-NPs reported in some studies, primary genotoxic effects cannot be excluded. Further studies are needed to clarify the exact mode of action of TiO₂-NPs and to highlight which physicochemical properties lead to their genotoxicity in vitro to ultimately identify a specific combination of parameters that could represent a risk in vivo.     

Amplification of arsenic genotoxicity by TiO2 nanoparticles in mammalian cells: new insights from physicochemical interactions and mitochondria

Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO₂ NPs) have shown great adsorption capacity for arsenic (As); however, the potential impact of TiO₂ NPs on the behavior and toxic responses of As remains largely unexplored. In the present study, we focused on the physicochemical interaction between TiO₂ NPs and As(III) to clarify the underlying mechanisms involved in their synergistic genotoxic effect on mammalian cells. Our data showed that As(III) mainly interacted with TiO₂ NPs by competitively occupying the sites of hydroxyl groups on the surface of TiO₂ NP aggregates, resulting in more aggregation of TiO₂ NPs. Although TiO₂ NPs at concentrations used here had no cytotoxic or genotoxic effects on cells, they efficiently increased the genotoxicity of As(III) in human-hamster hybrid (A_L) cells. The synergistic genotoxicity of TiO₂ NPs and As(III) was partially inhibited by various endocytosis pathway inhibitors while it was completely blocked by an As(III)-specific chelator. Using a mitochondrial membrane potential fluorescence probe, a reactive oxygen species (ROS) probe together with mitochondrial DNA-depleted ρ⁰ A_L cells, we discovered that mitochondria were essential for mediating the synergistic DNA-damaging effects of TiO₂ NPs and As(III). These data provide novel mechanistic proof that TiO₂ NPs enhanced the genotoxicity of As(III) via physicochemical interactions, which were mediated by mitochondria-dependent ROS.     

Cytotoxicity screening and cytokine profiling of nineteen nanomaterials enables hazard ranking and grouping based on inflammogenic potential

Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are being produced for an increasing number of applications. Therefore, it is important to assess and categorize ENMs on the basis of their hazard potential. The immune system is the foremost defence against foreign bodies. Here we performed cytokine profiling of a panel of nineteen representative ENMs procured from the Joint Research Centre (JRC) and commercial sources. Physicochemical characterization was performed using dynamic light scattering. The ENMs were all shown to be endotoxin content free. The human macrophage-differentiated THP.1 cell line was employed for cytotoxicity screening and based on the calculated IC₅₀ values, the multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), ZnO, Ag and SiO₂ NMs were found to be the most cytotoxic while single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), TiO₂, BaSO₄ and CeO₂ NMs, as well as the nanocellulose materials, were non-cytotoxic (at doses up to 100?µg/mL). Multiplex profiling of cytokine and chemokine secretion indicated that the TiO₂, SiO₂, BaSO₄, CeO₂ and nanocellulose materials induced potent inflammatory responses at sub-cytotoxic doses. Hierarchical clustering of cytokine responses coupled with pathway analysis demonstrated that the panel of ENMs could be segregated into two distinct groups characterized by activation and deactivation, respectively, of PPAR (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor)/LXR (liver X receptor/retinoid X receptor) nuclear receptor pathways (NRPs). Furthermore, using rosiglitazone, a selective PPAR-γ agonist, we could show that PPAR-γ played an important role in the activation of inflammatory responses in cells exposed to TiO₂ and SiO₂ NMs. These studies show that ENMs of diverse chemical compositions can be grouped according to their inflammatory potential.     

No evidence of the genotoxic potential of gold,silver, zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in the SOS chromotest

Gold nanoparticles (Au NPs), silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs), zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) and titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO₂ NPs) are widely used in cosmetic products such as preservatives, colorants and sunscreens. This study investigated the genotoxicity of Au NPs, Ag NPs, ZnO NPs and TiO₂ NPs using the SOS chromotest with Escherichia coli PQ37. The maximum exposure concentrations for each nanoparticle were 3.23 mg l^–1 for Au NPs, 32.3 mg l^–1 for Ag NPs and 100 mg l^–1 for ZnO NPs and TiO₂ NPs. Additionally, in order to compare the genotoxicity of nanoparticles and corresponding dissolved ions, the ions were assessed in the same way as nanoparticles. The genotoxicity of the titanium ion was not assessed because of the extremely low solubility of TiO₂ NPs. Au NPs, Ag NPs, ZnO NPs, TiO₂ NPs and ions of Au, Ag and Zn, in a range of tested concentrations, exerted no effects in the SOS chromotest, evidenced by maximum IF (IFmax) values of below 1.5 for all chemicals. Owing to the results, nanosized Au NPs, Ag NPs, ZnO NPs, TiO₂ NPs and ions of Au, Ag and Zn are classified as non‐genotoxic on the basis of the SOS chromotest used in this study. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the genotoxicity of Au NPs, Ag NPs, ZnO NPs and TiO₂ NPs using the SOS chromotest. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Oxidative stress and genotoxicity in Rhinella arenarum (Anura: Bufonidae) tadpoles after acute exposure to Ni-Al nanoceramics

The employ of nanomaterials (NMs) has exponentially grown due to the large number of technological advances in industrial, pharmaceutical and medical areas. That is the case of alumina (Al) nanoparticles which are extensively employed as support in heterogeneous catalysis processes. However, these NMs can cause great toxicity because of their ubiquitous properties, such as extremely small size and high specific surface area. So, it is required to assess the potential deleterious effects of these NMs on living organisms. In the present study, we analyze the oxidative stress and genotoxic potential of a nanoceramic catalyst Ni/<gamma>-Al₂O₃ (NC) and the NMs involved in their synthesis, <gamma>-Al₂O₃ support (SPC) and NiO/<gamma>-Al₂O₃ precursor (PC) on Rhinella arenarum larvae. Biomarkers of oxidative stress and genotoxic damage were measured in tadpoles exposed to 5 and 25 mg/L of each NMs for 96 h. The results indicated an inhibition of catalase activity in tadpoles exposed to both concentrations of PC and to 25 mg/L of SPC and NC. Moreover, both exposure concentrations of PC and NC significantly inhibited superoxide dismutase activity. Exposure to the three NMs caused inhibition of glutathione S-transferase activity, but there were no significant variations in reduced glutathione levels. Oxidative stress damage (lipid peroxidation) was observed in tadpoles treated with 25 mg/L PC, while the other treatments did not produce alterations. The MNs frequency significantly increased in larvae exposed to 25 mg/L PC indicating irreversible genotoxic damage. The results show that these NMs exert genotoxic effects and antioxidant defense system disruption in R. arenarum larvae.     

Evaluation of distribution,redox parameters,and genotoxicity in Wistar rats co-exposed to silver and titanium dioxide nanoparticles

ABSTRACT

The increasing production of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO₂NPs) has resulted in their elevated concentrations in the environment. This study was, therefore, aimed at determining the distribution, redox parameters, and genotoxic effects in male Wistar rats that were treated with either AgNP or TiO₂NP individually, as well as under a co-exposure scenario. Animals were exposed via oral gavage to either sodium citrate buffer (vehicle), 0.5 mg/kg/day TiO₂NP, 0.5 mg/kg/day AgNP or a mixture of TiO₂NPs and AgNPs. Exposure lasted 45 days after which rats were sacrificed, and tissue biodistribution of Ag and Ti measured. The blood concentration of glutathione (GSH) and activities of glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and catalase (CAT) were determined while the genotoxicity was analyzed using the comet assay in peripheral blood and liver cells. The tissue concentrations of Ag followed the order; blood > liver > kidneys while for Ti the order was kidneys > liver > blood. There was no significant change in the measured redox parameters in animals that were exposed to TiO₂NPs. However, there was a significant increase in GSH levels accompanied by a reduction in the GPx activity in AgNP-treated and co-exposed groups. The individual or co-exposure to TiO₂NP and AgNP did not markedly induce genotoxicity in blood or liver cells. Data showed that TiO₂NP did not produce significant oxidative stress or genotoxicity in rats at the dose used in this study while the same dose level of AgNPs resulted in oxidative stress, but no noticeable adverse genotoxic effects.     

Genotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials: A critical review

In view of the fast-growing industrial applications of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), the evaluation of their genotoxic potential and of their mode of action is a necessity to conduct adequate hazard/risk assessment and to produce safer and sustainable ENMs. This review aims at: (i) Providing an evaluation of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity data available for ENM, and (ii) proposing minimal criteria for conducting nano-genotoxicity assays. The possible modes of action of ENM (i.e., generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mechanical interference with cellular components) and the potential cellular targets are discussed. The available studies are evaluated on the basis of specific quality criteria after categorisation according to ENMs type/size investigated. No definitive conclusion can be drawn concerning the genotoxic activity of ENMs, essentially because of the limited number of data, incomplete physico-chemical characterization of ENMs examined and shortcomings in experimental approaches. This evaluation revealed gaps to be considered in future studies (e.g., one-sided approach focusing mainly on ROS as mode of action) and the need to develop adequate positive controls for genotoxicity assays when conducted with nanomaterials.     

Effect of size and shape on toxicity of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanomaterials in human peripheral blood lymphocytes

The multi-industrial applications of zinc oxide nanomaterials (ZnO NMs) lead to increasing exposure to humans. Though the ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) toxicity had been evaluated previously, toxicity of other forms of ZnO nanomaterials has not been evaluated. In this study, cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of four different types of ZnO NMs were evaluated using human peripheral blood lymphocytes (HPBL). In addition, the effect of anti-oxidants on ZnO NMs induced toxicity was also evaluated. Our results suggest that, size and shape of the nanomaterials have profound effects on their toxicity. The NPs and nanorods (NRs) possessed higher level of oxidative potential and ROS generation capacity than microparticles (MPs) and microrods (MRs). In contrast, MPs and MRs possessed higher level of lipid peroxidation capacity. The smaller NPs are more genotoxic while larger MPs and MRs were more cytotoxic in nature. Treatment with vitamin C or Quercetin significantly reduces the genotoxicity associated with ZnO NMs. The influence of size and shape in mediating NMs toxicity should be taken into account and the possible supplementation of anti-oxidants might mitigate the toxicity.     

Assessment of evidence for nanosized titanium dioxide-generated DNA strand breaks and oxidatively damaged DNA in cells and animal models

Nanosized titanium dioxide (TiO₂) has been investigated in numerous studies on genotoxicity, including comet assay endpoints and oxidatively damaged DNA in cell cultures and animal models. The results have been surprisingly mixed, which might be attributed to physico-chemical differences of the tested TiO₂. In the present review, we assess the role of certain methodological issues and publication bias. The analysis shows that studies on DNA strand breaks without proper assay controls or very low intra-group variation tend to show statistically significant effects. Levels of oxidatively damaged DNA, measured by the enzyme-modified comet assay, tend to show no effect in studies that have not included proper assay controls or they have uncertainty about the measurement. In addition, there are indications of publication and reporting bias. Nevertheless, the analysis shows that Aeroxide P25 generates DNA strand breaks in a concentration-dependent manner, which is not dependent on the duration of exposure. The standard comet assay seems to be able to discriminate between the genotoxicity of different types of TiO₂, where anatase TiO₂ seems to be the form with strongest genotoxic potential. Cell culture studies also demonstrate increased levels of oxidatively damaged DNA after exposure to TiO₂. There are relatively few studies on animal models where DNA strand breaks and oxidatively damaged DNA have been tested with reliable methods. Collectively, this review shows that exposure to nanosized TiO₂ is associated with genotoxicity in cells, whereas there are still too few reliable studies to assess the genotoxic potential in animal models.     

DNA methylation changes in human lung epithelia cells exposed to multi-walled carbon nanotubes

Humans are increasingly exposed to nanoparticles and, although many of their physiological effects have been described, the molecular mechanisms underlying them are still largely unknown. The present study aimed to determine the possible role of certain epigenetic mechanisms in the cellular response of human lung epithelial cells that are triggered by long-term exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO₂NPs) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). The results showed that exposure to TiO₂NPs had only minor effects on genome-wide DNA methylation. However, we identified 755 CpG sites showing consistent DNA hypomethylation in cells exposed to MWCNTs. These sites were mainly located at low density CpG regions and enhancers, and very frequently on the X chromosome. Our results thus suggest that long-term MWCNT exposure may have important effects on the epigenome.     

Induction of chromosomal aberrations by carbon nanotubes and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in human lymphocytes in vitro

Abstract

We examined if three commercially available nanomaterials – short singlewall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), short multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and nanosized titanium dioxide anatase (TiO₂; primary particle size <25 nm) – can induce structural chromosomal aberrations (CAs) in cultures of isolated human lymphocytes. To find a suitable sampling time, the cells were treated with 6.25–300 μg/ml of the nanomaterials for 24, 48 and 72 h. The 48-h treatment was the most effective, inducing a dose-dependent increase in chromosome-type CAs (all materials) and chromatid-type CAs (SWCNTs and TiO₂ anatase). The 72-h treatment yielded a positive result with SWCNTs. None of the treatments significantly affected cell count or the mitotic index. Our results suggest that with nanomaterials a continuous treatment for about two cell cycles is needed for CA induction, possibly reflecting access of nanomaterials to the nucleus during the first mitosis or delayed secondary genotoxic effect associated with the inflammatory process.     

Modifications of the bacterial reverse mutation test reveals mutagenicity of TiO2 nanoparticles and byproducts from a sunscreen TiO2-based nanocomposite

The bacterial reverse mutation test, recommended by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to determine genotoxicity of chemical compounds, has been recently used by several authors to investigate nanoparticles. Surprisingly, test results have been negative, whereas in vitro mammalian cell tests often give positive genotoxic responses. In the present study, we used the fluctuation test procedure with the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA97a, TA98, TA100 and TA102 to determine the mutagenic potential of TiO₂ nanoparticles (NP-TiO₂) and showed that, when it is used conventionally, this test is not suitable for nanoparticle genotoxicity assessment. Indeed, the medium used during exposure prevents electrostatic interactions between bacterial cells and nanoparticles, leading to false-negative responses. We showed that a simple pre-exposure of bacteria to NP-TiO₂ in a low ionic strength solution (NaCl 10 mM) at a pH below the nanoparticle isoelectric points (pH 5.5) can strongly improve the accuracy of the test. Thus, based on these improvements, we have demonstrated the genotoxicity of the engineered NP-TiO₂ tested and a NP-TiO₂ byproduct from a sunscreen nanocomposite. It was also shown that strain TA102 is more sensitive than the other strains, suggesting an oxidative stress-mediated mechanism of genotoxicity.