Isolated Donor Specific Alloantibody-Mediated Rejection after ABO Compatible Liver Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after liver transplantation is recognized in ABO incompatible and xeno-transplantation, but its role after ABO compatible liver transplantation is controversial. We report a case of ABO compatible liver transplantation that demonstrated clinical, serological and histological signs of AMR without evidence of concurrent acute cellular rejection. AMR with persistently high titers of circulating donor specific antibodies resulted in graft injury with initial centrilobular hepatocyte necrosis, fibroedematous portal expansion mimicking biliary tract outflow obstruction, ultimately resulting in extensive bridging fibrosis. Immunofluorescence microscopy demonstrated persistent, diffuse linear C4d deposits along sinusoids and central veins. Despite intense therapeutic intervention including plasmapheresis, IVIG and rituximab, AMR led to graft failure. We present evidence that an antibody-mediated alloresponse to an ABO compatible liver graft can cause significant graft injury independent of acute cellular rejection. AMR shows distinct histologic changes including a characteristic staining profile for C4d.     

C4d immunostaining is an independent predictor of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and death in heart transplant recipients

Antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) occurs in 10–20% of patients after heart transplantation. C4d immunostaining is one parameter used in its diagnosis. This study aimed to determine whether C4d staining has prognostic significance for mortality, coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV), cell‐mediated rejection (CMR), and graft dysfunction in patients post‐transplantation. Consecutive patients receiving an endomyocardial biopsy between 2007 and 2008 were selected. Left ventricular function, angiography, episodes of AMR/CMR, and death were noted. C4d was graded from 0 to 3 (immunostaining). Cox proportional models (recurrent events analysis) were used to evaluate C4d staining with mortality, graft dysfunction, CAV (≥grade 2), and episodes of ≥2R‐CMR. We analyzed 2525 biopsy specimens (n = 217). During a follow‐up of 4.5 ± 2 years, 35 died, 49 had graft dysfunction, seven had ≥grade 2 CAV, and 95 episodes of CMR occurred. A one‐grade increase in C4d staining was associated with an increase in mortality (HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.0–2.5), a higher risk of CAV (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.04–5.4), and a trend toward graft dysfunction (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.0–2.09). C4d was not associated with CMR. C4d immunostaining was a significant predictor of CAV and death but not subsequent episodes of CMR. There was also a trend toward increased graft failure.     

C4d in Acute Rejection After Liver Transplantation—A Valuable Tool in Differential Diagnosis to Hepatitis C Recurrence

Hepatitis C is the most common indication for liver transplantation. Recurrence of HCV is universal leading to graft failure in up to 40% of all patients. The differentiation between acute rejection and recurrent hepatitis C is crucial as rejection treatments are likely to aggravate HCV recurrence. Histological examination of liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis of acute rejection but has failed in the past to distinguish between acute rejection and recurrent hepatitis C. We have recently reported that C4d as a marker of the activated complement cascade is detectable in hepatic specimen in acute rejection after liver transplantation. In this study, we investigate whether C4d may serve as a specific marker for differential diagnosis in hepatitis C reinfection cases. Immunohistochemical analysis of 97 patients was performed. A total of 67.7% of patients with acute cellular rejection displayed C4d-positive staining in liver biopsy whereas 11.8% of patients with hepatitis C reinfection tested positive for C4d. In the control group, 6.9% showed C4d positivity. For the first time we were able to clearly demonstrate that humoral components, represented by C4d deposition, play a role in acute cellular rejection after LTX. Consequently C4d may be helpful to distinguish between acute rejection and reinfection after LTX for HCV.     

C4d deposition in allograft renal biopsies is an independent risk factor for graft failure

Aim:   Association between C4d deposition and renal allograft survival is still uncertain. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcome of C4d deposition in allograft renal biopsies.
Methods:   One hundred and fifty biopsies from 150 patients with a histological diagnosis of acute rejection from December 1997 to March 2007 were included. Paraffin-embedded sections were stained with a polyclonal antibody using an immunoperoxidase technique. Detailed clinical data were obtained by retrospective review.
Results:   C4d was stained positively in 74 (49.3%) of 150 cases: 47 (61.5%) biopsies showed diffuse C4d deposition and 27 (38.5%) showed focal C4d deposition. During follow up, significantly more C4d-positive patients (24/74 patients, 32.4%) lost their grafts, compared with the C4d-negative group (10/76 patients, 13.2%) ( P  = 0.005). After a Kaplan–Meier analysis, grafts from the C4d-negative group had a markedly higher survival as compared with the C4d-positive group ( P  = 0.003, log–rank test). Graft survival among C4d-negative, C4d diffuse-positive, and C4d focal-positive groups was significantly different ( P  = 0.007, log–rank test). The graft survival rate among C4d-negative patients in early (<6 months) and later biopsies (>6 months), and C4d-positive patients in early and in later biopsies was different ( P  = 0.028, log–rank test). The adjusted risk ratio of graft failure after Cox proportional hazards multivariate analyses for C4d-positive patients was 3.309 (95% confidence interval, 1.413–6.537; P  = 0.004).
Conclusion:   Patients with C4d deposition had an inferior graft survival, especially with diffused C4d deposition, and later experienced acute rejection. C4d deposition was an independent risk factor for graft survival.     

移植肝内C4d沉积在肝移植急性和慢性排斥反应诊断和治疗中的意义

目的 观察移植肝组织中补体C4的裂解片断CAd沉积情况,探讨其与排斥反应的关系,为临床诊断和治疗排斥反应提供思路和依据.方法 25例肝移植患者术后共行移植肝穿刺36次,取34次肝脏穿刺样本入组研究.穿刺时间为移植后7 d至25个月,所有供肝移植前均留取样本.穿刺所得移植肝组织进行HE染色和免疫组织化学染色,观察CAd的沉积情况.结果 34次病理检查中,诊断为急性排斥反应16次,慢性排斥反应9次,非排斥反应9次(包括胆道并发症3次,药物性肝损害5次,乙型肝炎复发1次).移植前供肝组织中均未见CAd沉积.发生急性排斥反应者中,9例(9/16)移植肝组织中可见到C4d沉积,发生慢性排斥反应者中,5例(5/9)移植肝组织中可见到CAd沉积,非排斥反应者中,仅1例(1/9)非吻合口胆管狭窄患者的肝组织中有CAd沉积.排斥者和非排斥者的CAd沉积部位无明显差异.急性排斥反应者和慢性排斥反应者的C4d阳性率均高于非排斥反应者(P<0.05,P<0.05);CAd阳性率与肝损伤程度无明显相关性.CAd阳性者激素冲击有效率为35.7%(5/14),远低于CAd阴性者的63.6%(7/11).结论 CAd沉积可提示体液性排斥反应,可作为肝移植后肝损害时病理检查的常规免疫组织化学项目,有利于监测和预警体液性排斥反应的发生.并为选择冲击治疗方案提供依据.     

Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Human Cardiac Allografts: Evaluation of Immunoglobulins and Complement Activation Products C4d and C3d as Markers

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in human heart transplantation is an immunopathologic process in which injury to the graft is in part the result of activation of complement and it is poorly responsive to conventional therapy. We evaluated by immunofluorescence (IF), 665 consecutive endomyocardial biopsies from 165 patients for deposits of immunoglobulins and complement. Diffuse IF deposits in a linear capillary pattern greater than 2+ were considered significant. Clinical evidence of graft dysfunction was correlated with complement deposits. IF 2+ or higher was positive for IgG, 66%; IgM, 12%; IgA, 0.6%; C1q, 1.8%; C4d, 9% and C3d, 10%. In 3% of patients, concomitant C4d and C3d correlated with graft dysfunction or heart failure. In these 5 patients AMR occurred 56-163 months after transplantation, and they responded well to therapy for AMR but not to treatment with steroids. Systematic evaluation of endomyocardial biopsies is not improved by the use of antibodies for immunoglobulins or C1q. Concomitant use of C4d and C3d is very useful to diagnose AMR, when correlated with clinical parameters of graft function. AMR in heart transplant patients can occur many months or years after transplant.     

Glomerular c4d immunoreactivity in acute rejection biopsies of renal transplant patients

In renal transplant patients, glomerulitis may be present in all types of acute rejection, often accompanied by diffuse C4d staining of peritubular capillaries: C4d3 positivity in more than 50% of peritubular capillaries. It may progress to chronic transplant glomerulopathy, characterized by capillary basement membrane multilayering, proteinuria, and progressive loss of renal function. While C4d3 is a recognized marker of an antibody-mediated reaction, the significance of glomerular C4d (GlC4d) staining is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate GlC4d immunoreactivity and its correlation with C4d3 in acute rejection biopsies. Paraffin-embedded acute rejection biopsies from 90 renal transplant patients were evaluated according to the Banff classification. Biopsies showing C4d-positive endothelial cells in more than 50% of glomeruli were considered GlC4d-positive. C4d3-positive staining prevalence was 23%. GlC4d-positive staining showed an 89% concordance rate (r = 0.81, P < .0001; Cohen's k = 0.80, P < .0001). GlC4d detection sensitivity was 0.80 and specificity 0.97. C4d3 and GlC4d immunoreactivity was significantly associated with glomerulitis (P < .006 and P < .03, respectively) and with proteinuria at the time of biopsy (P < .03 and P < .01, respectively). Interestingly, GlC4d positivity correlated better than C4d3 positivity with the presence of posttransplant circulating anti-human leukocyte antigen alloantibodies (P < .04 and P = .7, respectively). Patients with C4d3- or GlC4d-positive acute rejections underwent graft loss due to interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy more frequently than those with C4d0- or GlC4d-negative rejections (P < .0001 and P < .005, respectively), whereas no differences were observed in graft loss due to death. In conclusion, C4d3 and GlC4d stains showed a high correlation rate. Compared with C4d3, GlC4d staining demonstrated good sensitivity and excellent specificity. Our results suggested that GlC4d staining may indicate glomerular endothelial damage and be of prognostic value.     

Solid phase detection of C4d‐fixing HLA antibodies to predict rejection in high immunological risk kidney transplant recipients

Protocols for recipient desensitization may allow for successful kidney transplantation across major immunological barriers. Desensitized recipients, however, still face a considerable risk of antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR), which underscores the need for risk stratification tools to individually tailor treatment. Here, we investigated whether solid phase detection of complement‐fixing donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) has the potential to improve AMR prediction in high‐risk transplants. The study included 68 sensitized recipients of deceased donor kidney allografts who underwent peritransplant immunoadsorption for alloantibody depletion (median cytotoxic panel reactivity: 73%; crossmatch conversion: n = 21). Pre and post‐transplant sera were subjected to detection of DSA‐triggered C4d deposition ([C4d]DSA) applying single‐antigen bead (SAB) technology. While standard crossmatch and [IgG]SAB testing failed to predict outcomes in our desensitized patients, detection of preformed [C4d]DSA (n = 44) was tightly associated with C4d‐positive AMR [36% vs. 8%, P = 0.01; binary logistic regression: odds ratio: 10.1 (95% confidence interval: 1.6–64.2), P = 0.01]. Moreover, long‐term death‐censored graft survival tended to be worse among [C4d]DSA‐positive recipients (P = 0.07). There were no associations with C4d‐negative AMR or cellular rejection. [C4d]DSA detected 6 months post‐transplantation were not related to clinical outcomes. Our data suggest that pretransplant SAB‐based detection of complement‐fixing DSA may be a valuable tool for risk stratification.     

Tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil can effectively reverse C4d-positive steroid-resistant acute rejection in Chinese renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (TAC) combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been suggested to play a critical role in the reversal of C4d-positive acute humoral rejection (AHR) in renal transplantation, but the efficacy of using only TAC-MMF without immunoadsorption or plasmapheresis has not been investigated. On the other hand, Chinese recipients of renal grafts usually need lower doses of immunosuppressants, and their optimal treatment for acute humoral rejection has not been established. METHODS: Since 1999, we have used TAC-MMF to treat steroid-resistant acute rejection (AR). C4d staining was retrospectively performed in 32 patients with steroid-resistant AR, and the treatments of 19 patients with C4d-positive steroid-resistant AR were investigated. RESULTS: Thirteen of 19 patients received TAC-MMF treatment only; 11 episodes of rejection in them were reversed (7 completely, 4 partially) and only 2 recipients lost their graft. Another 6 patients received immunoadsorption also. One of them failed to respond and lost her graft. Four of 5 patients treated with immunoadsorption and TAC-MMF recovered (3 completely, 1 partially), but 3 of them had severe pneumonia, a complication rate statistically higher than in patients treated with only TAC-MMF (P<0.05). AR occurring during the first two weeks after transplantation had a statistically better outcome than that occurring later (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the combination of TAC and MMF is a potentially safe and economic treatment for most Chinese renal allograft recipients with C4d-positive steroid-resistant AR, especially for rejections developing within the first two weeks after transplantation.     

C3d-positive donor-specific antibodies have a role in pretransplant risk stratification of cross-match-positive HLA-incompatible renal transplantation: United Kingdom multicentre study

Anti-HLA-antibody characteristics aid to risk-stratify patients and improve long-term renal graft outcomes. Complement activation by donor-specific antibody (DSA) is an important characteristic that may determine renal allograft outcome. There is heterogeneity in graft outcomes within the moderate to high immunological risk cases (cross-match-positive). We explored the role of C3d-positive DSAs in sub-stratification of cross-match-positive cases and relate to the graft outcomes. We investigated 139 cross-match-positive living-donor renal transplant recipients from four transplant centres in the United Kingdom. C3d assay was performed on serum samples obtained at pretreatment (predesensitization) and Day 14 post-transplant. C3d-positive DSAs were found in 52 (37%) patients at pretreatment and in 37 (27%) patients at Day 14 post-transplant. Median follow-up of patients was 48 months (IQR 20.47–77.57). In the multivariable analysis, pretreatment C3d-positive DSA was independently associated with reduced overall graft survival, the hazard ratio of 3.29 (95% CI 1.37–7.86). The relative risk of death-censored five-year graft failure was 2.83 (95% CI 1.56–5.13). Patients with both pretreatment and Day 14 C3d-positive DSAs had the worst five-year graft survival at 45.5% compared with 87.2% in both pretreatment and Day 14 C3d-negative DSA patients with the relative risk of death-censored five-year graft failure was 4.26 (95% CI 1.79, 10.09). In this multicentre study, we have demonstrated for the first time the utility of C3d analysis as a distinctive biomarker to sub-stratify the risk of poor graft outcome in cross-match-positive living-donor renal transplantation.     

In Vitro Detection of C4d-Fixing HLA Alloantibodies: Associations With Capillary C4d Deposition in Kidney Allografts

Capillary C4d deposition is a valuable marker of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). In this analysis, flow cytometric detection of alloantibody-triggered C4d deposition to HLA antigen-coated microparticles ([C4d]FlowPRA) was evaluated for its value as a marker for C4d deposition in renal allografts. For comparative analysis, 105 first renal biopsies performed for graft dysfunction and an equal number of concurrent sera were subjected to immunohistochemistry and [C4d] plus standard [IgG]FlowPRA, respectively. C4d deposition/fixation was detected in 17 biopsies and, applying [C4d]FlowPRA HLA class I and II screening, also in a small number of corresponding sera (N = 20). IgG reactivity detected by standard [IgG]FlowPRA was more frequent (49% of sera). Comparing [C4d]FlowPRA screening with capillary C4d staining, we found a high level of specificity (0.92 [95% confidence interval: 0.86–0.98]), which far exceeded that calculated for [IgG]FlowPRA (0.60 [0.50–0.70]). [IgG]FlowPRA screening, however, turned out to be superior in terms of sensitivity (0.94 [0.83–1.05] vs. 0.76 [0.56–0.97] calculated for C4d-fixing panel reactivity). Remarkably, posttransplant single antigen testing for identification of complement-fixing donor-specific alloreactivities failed to improve the predictive value of FlowPRA-based serology. In conclusion, our results suggest that detection of complement-fixing HLA panel reactivity could provide a specific tool for monitoring of C4d-positive AMR.     

肾移植一年后急性排斥反应时移植肾组织中C4d表达阳性的临床研究

目的 观察肾移植1年后发生急性排斥反应时移植肾组织中补体片段C4d的表达情况,分析其对移植肾功能及预后的影响.方法 选择肾移植时间超过1年,临床诊断为急性排斥反应并经病理穿刺活检证实的肾移植受者36例为研究对象.以第1例受者移植肾组织穿刺时间为观察起点(2006年3月),以此项研究结束时间为观察终点(2010年4月).应用C4d多克隆抗体对移植肾穿刺组织行免疫组织化学染色,检测C4d在移植肾组织中的表达情况;根据检测结果,分为C4d阳性组和阴性组,分析和比较两组在观察时间段内移植肾功能的变化及存活时间.结果 在36例受者的移植肾穿刺标本中,C4d阳性16例(44.4%),C4d阴性20例(55.6%);C4d阳性组和阴性组移植肾组织中嗜酸性粒细胞浸润数量分别为(9.4±4.5)个和(2.6±1.8)个,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).在观察时间段内,所有受者血清肌酐均有不同程度上升,但C4d阳性组上升幅度与C4d阴性组比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);C4d阳性组和C4d阴性组受者移植肾功能丧失率分别为31.3%(5/16)和30.0%(6/20),两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).C4d阳性组和C4d阴性组受者移植肾穿刺后的巾位存活时间分别为(19.3±5.3)个月和(22.5±7.4)个月,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 肾移植1年后发生急性排斥反应时,移植肾组织中C4d表达阳性对其功能及存活时间无明显影响.     

Re‐examination of the Lymphocytotoxic Crossmatch in Liver Transplantation: Can C4d Stains Help in Monitoring?

C4d-assisted recognition of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPE) from donor-specific antibody-positive (DSA+) renal allograft recipients prompted study of DSA+ liver allograft recipients as measured by lymphocytotoxic crossmatch (XM) and/or Luminex. XM results did not influence patient or allograft survival, or cellular rejection rates, but XM+ recipients received significantly more prophylactic steroids. Endothelial C4d staining strongly correlates with XM+ (<3 weeks posttransplantation) and DSA+ status and cellular rejection, but not with worse Banff grading or treatment response. Diffuse C4d staining, XM+, DSA+ and ABO- incompatibility status, histopathology and clinical-serologic profile helped establish an isolated AMR diagnosis in 5 of 100 (5%) XM+ and one ABO-incompatible, recipients. C4d staining later after transplantation was associated with rejection and nonrejection-related causes of allograft dysfunction in DSA- and DSA+ recipients, some of whom had good outcomes without additional therapy. Liver allograft FFPE C4d staining: (a) can help classify liver allograft dysfunction; (b) substantiates antibody contribution to rejection; (c) probably represents nonalloantibody insults and/or complete absorption in DSA- recipients and (d) alone, is an imperfect AMR marker needing correlation with routine histopathology, clinical and serologic profiles. Further study in late biopsies and other tissue markers of liver AMR with simultaneous DSA measurements are needed.     

Early Ultrastructural Changes in Renal Allografts: Correlation With Antibody‐Mediated Rejection and Transplant Glomerulopathy

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is associated with antibody‐mediated renal allograft rejection (AMR) and reduced graft survival. Histologically, TG is typically seen >1 year posttransplantation. However, ultrastructural changes including glomerular endothelial swelling, subendothelial widening and early glomerular basement membrane duplication are associated with development of TG but appear much earlier. We examined the specificity of these changes for AMR, and whether these are inevitably associated with development of TG. Of 98 for cause renal allograft biopsies carried out within 3 months of transplantation with available serologic data, 17 showed C4d‐positive AMR and 16 had histologic changes of AMR and donor‐specific antibodies (DSA), but no C4d. All three ultrastructural changes were seen in 11 of 17 biopsies with C4d‐positive AMR, 8 of 16 with histologic changes of AMR and DSA but no C4d, and 0 of 65 without histologic changes of AMR and/or DSA (p < 0.0001 for both of the former groups vs. the latter). Twenty patients with positive DSA (18 with histologic changes of AMR and 11 C4d‐positive) had ≥1 follow‐up biopsy; eight developed overt TG 3.5–30 months posttransplantation. Among the 18 patients with DSA and histologic changes of AMR, 11 C4d‐positive and 7 C4d‐negative, treatment for AMR after the early biopsy significantly reduced subsequent development of overt TG.     

Measurement of human erythrocyte C4d to erythrocyte complement receptor 1 ratio in cardiac transplant recipients with acute symptomatic allograft failure

Background

Complement activation has been recognized as a contributing factor to cardiac allograft dysfunction. Combined measurement of erythrocyte C4d (E-C4d) and complement receptor 1 (E-CR1) are potential biomarkers to monitor complement activity in patients with autoimmune diseases. We conducted a prospective study using CR1-2B11 monoclonal antibody to detect the E-C4d to E-CR1 ratio among our cardiac transplant recipients with acute symptomatic allograft failure.

Materials and methods

Eight recipients with acute cardiac allograft failure and 72 healthy controls were included in this study. Levels of E-C4d and E-CR1 were measured by indirect immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. The results were utilized to determine the association between patient C4d staining, histological features, and clinical outcomes.

Results

Eight patients with nine episodes of sudden onset of graft failure and suspected antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) were included in this study. One patient who received emergent mechanical circulatory support was treated with plasmapheresis for his unstable hemodynamic status. The mean pretreatment left ventricular ejection fraction was 30.3%. No histological study demonstrated cellular rejection or AMR in any patient. There were two patients with positive C4d immunostaining. Three patients had four episodes of acute rejection with sudden death at home. The mean E-C4d/E-CR1 ratio in the study group (n = 9) was 0.22 ± 0.07, and 0.12 ± 0.10 in the control group (n = 72). As comparing both groups, we found the ratios were significant higher in the study group (P = .0003).

Conclusions

Measurement of the E-C4d/E-CR1 ratio may be a noninvasive method for detecting acute rejection after cardiac transplantation.     

体液性排斥反应患者移植物组织C4d沉积和浆细胞聚集性浸润初探

目的检测移植肝及肾组织中浆细胞的浸润和补体C4裂解产物C4d的沉积情况,分析浆细胞浸润、C4d沉积与体液性排斥反应的相关性。方法25例肝移植术后出现不同程度肝脏损害的患者的34次经皮肝脏穿刺活体组织病理检查标本与43例因排斥反应而丧失功能的移植肾组织,进行HE染色和免疫组织化学染色,对排斥反应进行病理分型,检测移植物组织中C4d和CD138的表达,分析二者之间的相关性。同时以10例非排斥反应导致移植肾功能丧失者和供肝术前标本作为对照。结果34个移植肝组织标本病理检查诊断为急性排斥反应16个,慢性排斥反应9个,非排斥反应9个。移植前供肝病理标本中均未见C4d沉积,急性排斥反应和慢性排斥反应标本中分别有9／16（56．3％）和5／9（55．6％）见到C4d沉积现象,非排斥反应标本只有1例非吻合口胆管狭窄患者C4d染色也呈阳性（11．1％）。移植肝排斥反应标本中11／25（44．0％）CD138阳性,8／25（32．0％）标本C4d和CD138均阳性。C4d的沉积与CD138的表达存在相关性（r=0．346,P〈0．05）。43例移植肾排斥反应中,超急性排斥反应5例,急性排斥反应9例,慢性排斥反应29例;43例中,C4d阳性19例（44．2％）,CD138阳性24例（55．8％）;有10例（23．3％）C4d和CD138均阳性,C4d的沉积与CD138的表达亦存在相关性（r=0．5051,P〈0．01）。10个对照标本中,C4d阳性1个,无CD138阳性标本。结论CD138与C4d的沉积存在相关性,提示移植肝和肾组织中聚集性浸润的浆细胞可能通过局部分泌抗体的方式参与体液性排斥反应。     

Role of CXCR3 in cellular but not humoral renal allograft rejection

CXCR3, a chemokine receptor mainly expressed by T cells, is involved in animal transplant models and in human allograft rejection. CXCR3 expression was localized in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded renal allograft biopsies without signs of rejection (C4d-negative, Banff 0, n = 16), with C4d deposits as a sign of humoral rejection (C4d-positive, Banff 0, n = 8), with cellular rejection (C4d-negative, Banff I, n = 7) and with signs of both cellular and humoral rejection (C4d-positive, Banff 1, n = 5). Small, round infiltrating cells were CXCR3-positive. A high number of these cells was present in biopsies with cellular rejection (independent of C4d deposition). CXCR3-positive cells diffusely infiltrated the interstitium, including the tubular epithelium (tubulitis). CXCR3 scores and the area of CXCR3 staining were significantly higher in cellular rejection, when compared to biopsies without rejection, and with deposition of C4d alone. CXCR3-positive cells infiltrate renal allografts during cellular rejection, whereas C4d deposition is not associated with the recruitment of these cells.     

Immunoadsorption in Severe C4d-Positive Acute Kidney Allograft Rejection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) frequently causes refractory graft dysfunction. This randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate whether immunoadsorption (IA) is effective in the treatment of severe C4d-positive AMR. Ten out of 756 kidney allograft recipients were included. Patients were randomly assigned to IA with protein A (N = 5) or no such treatment (N = 5) with the option of IA rescue after 3 weeks. Enrolled recipients were subjected to tacrolimus conversion and, if indicated, 'anti-cellular' treatment. All IA-treated patients responded to treatment. One death unrelated to IA occurred after successful reversal of rejection. Four control subjects remained dialysis-dependent. With the exception of one patient who developed graft necrosis, non-responders were subjected to rescue IA, however, without success. Because of a high graft loss rate in the control group the study was terminated after a first interim analysis. Even though limited by small patient numbers, this trial suggests efficiency of IA in reversing severe AMR.     

Correlation of Donor-Specific Antibodies, Complement and Its Regulators with Graft Dysfunction in Cardiac Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is an immunopathologic process in which activation of complement often results in allograft injury. This study correlates C4d and C3d with HLA serology and graft function as diagnostic criteria for AMR. Immunofluorescence staining for C4d and C3d was performed on 1511 biopsies from 330 patients as part of routine diagnostic work-up of rejection. Donor-specific antibodies were detected in 95% of those with C4d+C3d+ biopsies versus 35% in the C4d+C3d– group (p = 0.002). Allograft dysfunction was present in 84% in the C4d+ C3d+ group versus 5% in the C4d+C3d− group (p < 0.0001). Combined C4d and C3d positivity had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 99% for the pathologic diagnosis of AMR and a mortality of 37%. Since activation of complement does not always result in allograft dysfunction, we correlated the expression pattern of the complement regulators CD55 and CD59 in patients with and without complement deposition. The proportion of patients with CD55 and/or CD59 staining was highest in C4d+C3d− patients without allograft dysfunction (p = 0.03). We conclude that a panel of C4d and C3d is diagnostically more useful than C4d alone in the evaluation of AMR. CD55 and CD59 may play a protective role in patients with evidence of complement activation.     

Renal allograft biopsies in the era of C4d staining: the need for change in the Banff classification system.

C4d immunostaining in the peritubular capillaries (PTC) is a marker of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). We evaluated the histopathologic diagnoses of 388 renal transplant biopsies since the implementation of routine C4d immunostaining at our center. Of these, 155 (40%) biopsies had evidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR), out of which 119 (77%) had pure ACR, 31 (20%) had ACR with concomitant features of AMR, and five (3%) had ACR with focal C4d staining. Sixty-four (16%) biopsies exhibited features of AMR [33 (52%) pure AMR, and 31(48%) concomitant AMR and ACR]. One hundred and fifty-five (40%) biopsies had features of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). Of these, 20 (13%) had concomitant AMR [13 (8.5%) had pure AMR and seven (4.5%) had concomitant ACR and AMR]. Creatinine at the time of biopsy was higher in patients with mixed ACR and AMR and the clinical behavior of mixed lesions is more aggressive over time. Despite having a lower serum creatinine at the time of biopsy, patients with IFTA experienced gradual decline in graft function over time. The pathologic findings in renal allograft biopsies are often mixed and mixed lesions appear to have more aggressive clinical behavior. These findings suggest the need for change in the Banff classification system to better capture the complexity of renal allograft pathologies.