Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct hyperopic shift after radial keratotomy

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct hyperopic shift following radial keratotomy (RK). SETTING: Ophthalmic Health Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. METHODS: The study comprised 15 eyes of 12 patients who had uneventful RK and subsequently developed a hyperopic shift. Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser with 5.5 mm central and 7.5 mm peripheral ablation zones. The corneal flap was 160 microm in thickness and 8.5 mm in diameter. The refractive correction corresponded to the patients' refractive errors. RESULTS: The mean time after RK was 10.46 years +/- 2.21 (SD) and the mean follow-up after LASIK, 7.3 months (range 1 to 42 months). The mean spherical equivalent refraction was corrected from +3.08 +/- 1.02 diopters (D) to -0.16 +/- 0.73 D after LASIK. At the last examination, 12 eyes (80%) had a refractive error within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia and an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. No wound dehiscence, epithelial ingrowth, or other significant complication developed in any eye. CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative results of the correction by LASIK of a hyperopic shift after RK are encouraging, but long-term studies of a larger population group are required to evaluate the method's clinical value.     

Corneal suture for the correction of hyperopia following radial keratotomy

PURPOSE: To report the visual and refractive changes observed after double concentric corneal suture to correct hyperopic shift after radial keratotomy (RK). METHODS: This retrospective consecutive case series comprised 17 eyes (15 patients) that underwent two concentric corneal sutures (modified Grene Lasso suture) to correct hyperopic shift after RK. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon between 2000 and 2003. RESULTS: The mean time after RK was 11.6 +/- 3.2 years. The mean follow-up was 20.3 +/- 11.3 months. The spherical equivalent refraction was reduced from a preoperative mean of +4.38 +/- 2.87 diopters (D) to -0.54 +/- 2.59 D at last postoperative follow-up (P < .001). No statistically significant difference was observed in mean refractive astigmatism before and after the corneal suture (P = .15). Before surgery, no eye presented with best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) > or = 20/20. At final follow-up, 3 (17.6%) eyes attained this level. Seven (41.2%) eyes improved their BSCVA by > or = 2 Snellen lines. One (5.9%) eye lost 2 Snellen lines of BSCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal suture can be used to correct RK-induced hyperopia, improving the corneal asphericity in an attempt to stabilize these corneas. It appeared to be effective even for high degrees of hyperopia and in cases with associated irregular astigmatism or open incisions.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for consecutive hyperopia after myopic LASIK and radial keratotomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy, predictability, and safety of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (H-LASIK) for the correction of consecutive hyperopia after myopic-LASIK (M-LASIK) and radial keratotomy (RK). SETTING: The Eye Institute of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. METHODS: Seventy-seven eyes of 64 patients were studied. The eyes were divided into 2 groups based on the prior refractive procedures: in Group A (n = 34), H-LASIK was performed for overcorrection after M-LASIK and in Group B (n = 43), for overcorrection after RK. All eyes were included in the analysis of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Only eyes with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included in the analysis of visual and refractive results. Among these 66 eyes, 30 were in Group A and 36 were in Group B. The mean follow-up in these eyes was 12.34 months +/- 5.95 (SD) (range 6 to 33 months). RESULTS: Overall, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was +1.88 +/- 0.91 diopters (D) preoperatively and -0.37 +/- 0.65 D at the last visit. Eighty-three percent of eyes were within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia, and 66% were within +/-0.50 D. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/20 in 39% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 92% of eyes. The preoperative SE was +1.43 +/- 0.59 D in Group A and +2.26 +/- 0.96 D in Group B; the difference in the preoperative SE was significant (P=.001). However, there was no statistically significant between-group difference in postoperative refraction and UCVA. One eye in Group B (3%) lost 2 or more lines of best corrected visual acuity. Corneal ectasia developed in 1 eye in Group B 11 months after H-LASIK. A sliver occurred in 1 eye in Group A after the flap was recut. CONCLUSION: Hyperopic LASIK was equally effective and predictable in treating consecutive hyperopia after overcorrected M-LASIK and overcorrected RK. The safety of the procedure in the RK group appeared to be inferior to that in the M-LASIK group. Although vision-threatening complications are rare after H-LASIK retreatment, corneal ectasia developed in 1 eye in the RK group.     

Surface ablation after laser in situ keratomileusis: retreatment on the flap

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of superficial laser ablation on the flap as a treatment for residual ametropia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Private practice refractive surgery center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 18 eyes of 15 patients who had alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) retreatment for residual ametropia after LASIK. All patients who had retreatment on the flap between June 2004 and June 2005 were included in the study. Retreatments were performed by wavefront-guided excimer laser surface ablation using the Visx Star S4 laser. Outcome measures included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), subjective refraction, and biomicroscopy at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative visits. RESULTS: The preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was -0.63 diopter (D) +/- 0.87 (SD) (range -2.00 to +1.38 D). The mean amount of ablated cornea was 21.3 +/- 7.4 microm. At 3 months, the mean UCVA was 0.83 +/- 1.5 lines (range 0.40 to 1.25), yielding an efficacy index of 0.87. At 6 months, the mean UCVA increased to 0.98 +/- 0.8 line (range 0.63 to 1.25) and the efficacy index, to 1.03. At 12 months, 6 eyes were lost to follow-up. The mean UCVA was 0.83 +/- 2.2 lines (range 0.20 to 1.25), with an efficacy index of 0.87. The mean BSCVA was 0.98 +/- 0.9 line (range 0.80 to 1.25) at 3 months and 1.05 +/- 0.6 line (range 0.80 to 1.25) at 6 months, yielding a safety index of 1.03 and 1.11, respectively. At 12 months, the mean BSCVA was 0.95 +/- 1.0 line (range 0.63 to 1.25), with a safety index of 1.0. At 6 months, no eye had lost lines of BSCVA, 11 eyes had no change, and 7 eyes gained 1 line. At 12 months, 2 eyes lost 1 line of BSCVA, 8 eyes had no change, and 2 eyes gained 1 line. The mean SE refraction was +0.10 +/- 0.27 D (range -0.25 to +0.63 D) at 3 months, +0.06 +/- 0.37 D (range -0.50 to +1.13 D) at 6 months, and +0.15 +/- 0.39 D (range -0.50 to +0.88 D) at 12 months. On biomicroscopic examination, 1 eye had prolonged grade 1 haze that disappeared before 6 months. Two eyes of 1 patient who had hyperopic retreatment developed late-onset haze 8 months postoperatively. Eyes with microstriae in the flap before retreatment showed significant improvement after retreatment. There were no sight-threatening complications. CONCLUSION: Wavefront-guided LASEK or alcohol-assisted PRK retreatment on the surface of a LASIK flap was safe and effective in correcting small amounts of residual myopia.     

Surgically induced astigmatism after hyperopic and myopic photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To compare the axis and magnitude of surgically induced refractive astigmatism (SIA) after hyperopic and myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, the VISX Star S2 excimer laser was used to create a peripheral annular ablation profile to correct spherical hyperopia in 23 eyes of 16 consecutive patients. Attempted corrections ranged from +0.50 diopter (D) to +4.25 D with 0 to 1.00 D of astigmatism. The same laser was used to create a central ablation profile to correct spherical myopia in 25 eyes of 17 consecutive patients. Attempted corrections ranged from -2.25 to -6.50 D with 0 to 1.00 D of astigmatism. The absolute change in refractive astigmatism was calculated by taking the difference in magnitudes of astigmatism before and after laser treatment without regard to axis. Axis and magnitude of SIA were analyzed by vector differences. Magnitudes were compared using the Student t test, and axial shifts were compared using the chi-square test. All patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months. RESULTS: The mean changes in absolute astigmatism were 0.29 +/- 0.28 D at 3 months and 0.34 +/- 0.29 D at 6 months after hyperopic PRK and 0.40 +/- 0.35 D at 3 months and 0.39 +/- 0.36 D at 6 months after myopic PRK. The mean vectoral magnitudes were 0.49 +/- 0.29 at 3 months and 0.52 +/- 0.25 at 6 months after hyperopic PRK and 0.48 +/- 0.39 at 3 months and 0.44 +/- 0.38 at 6 months after myopic PRK. The mean values for SIA (the centroid) were 0.10 +/- 0.57 D x 113 degrees at 3 months and 0.15 +/- 0.57 D x 131 degrees at 6 months after hyperopic PRK and 0.04 +/- 0.63 D x 160 degrees at 3 months and 0.08 +/- 0.58 D x 171 degrees at 6 months after myopic PRK. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in vectoral axis or magnitude of SIA. CONCLUSION: Surgically induced astigmatism after hyperopic PRK was comparable to astigmatism induced by myopic PRK. A peripheral annular ablation for hyperopic correction, similar to a central ablation in myopic PRK, did not appear to result in uneven corneal healing causing astigmatism.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of hyperopia. Results of a 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for low to moderate hyperopia with a 2-year follow-up. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. METHODS: This prospective comparative single-surgeon study included 216 eyes of 108 patients with hyperopia who received PRK in 1 eye and LASEK in the contralateral eye. The mean patient age was 38.3 years (range 25 to 58 years). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) cycloplegic refraction was +3.67 diopters (D) +/- 1.15 (SD) (range +2.00 to +5.00 D), and astigmatism was less than 1.00 D. In each patient, PRK was performed in 1 eye (Group A) and LASEK was performed in the other eye (Group B) using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, manifest and cycloplegic refractions, refractive stability and predictability, postoperative pain, and corneal haze were examined and statistically analyzed. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: At 1 week, the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 58% of PRK eyes and 85% of LASEK eyes (P =.037); at 2 years, it was 20/40 or better in 81% and 91%, respectively (P =.076). At 2 years, the UCVA for near was N8 or better in 73% of PRK eyes and 89% of LASEK eyes (P =.064). No patient lost 2 or more lines of Snellen visual acuity. The safety index was 1.03 in PRK eyes and 1.08 in LASEK eyes. Refractive stability was achieved at 6 months in LASEK eyes and at 12 months in PRK eyes. The mean SE cycloplegic refraction decreased from +3.58 D (PRK eyes) and +3.76 D (LASEK eyes) at baseline to +0.74 D and +0.32 D, respectively, at 2 years; in 57% and 78% of eyes, respectively, the refraction was within +/-0.50 D of the targeted refraction. Peripheral corneal haze scores at 3 to 9 months and pain scores at 1 to 3 days were significantly lower in the LASEK group than in the PRK group. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for hyperopia up to +5.00 D provided good visual and refractive results. It significantly reduced postoperative pain, grade of peripheral ring-shaped corneal haze, and regression of hyperopia. Hyperopic LASEK provided quicker visual recovery and achieved better efficacy, predictability, and refractive stability than hyperopic PRK.     

Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for the treatment of compound hyperopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To compare photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for compound hyperopic astigmatism. SETTING: University laser center. METHODS: This prospective nonrandomized study evaluated 41 consecutive eyes (27 patients) that had PRK and 24 consecutive eyes (15 patients) that had LASIK to correct compound hyperopic astigmatism. RESULTS: The mean preoperative error was +3.06 diopters of sphere (DS) +/-1.73 (SD)/+1.31 +/- 0.60 diopters of cylinder (DC) in the PRK eyes and +2.86 +/-1.28 DS/+1.55 +/- 0.96 DC in the LASIK eyes. The mean maximal pain score in PRK eyes was 1.95 +/- 1.19 (range 0.0 to 3.0) in PRK eyes and 0.84 +/-1.12 in LASIK eyes (P=.0014). The uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 7.7% of the PRK eyes and 58.3% of the LASIK eyes at 1 month (P<.001) and 57.9% and 66.7%, respectively, at 9 months (P=.586). The mean postoperative spherical error was -0.95 +/- 0.92 D in PRK eyes and +0.33 +/- 0.56 D in LASIK eyes at 1 month (P<.001) and +0.64 +/- 1.01 D and +0.44 +/- 0.57 D, respectively, at 9 months (P=.375). There was no statistically significant between-group difference in the mean residual astigmatic error. Mild peripheral haze (grade 0.5 to 1.0) occurred in 19.5% of PRK eyes and no LASIK eye. No eye in either group lost more than 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy was more painful than LASIK and led to a slower visual recovery, a higher incidence of peripheral haze, and an initial myopic overcorrection, which self-corrected by 3 to 6 months. Efficacy and stability of the astigmatic correction were similar in both groups. Long-term stability of both procedures requires further study.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for refractive error after cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct refractive error following cataract surgery. SETTING: The Eye Institute, Sydney, Australia. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed 23 eyes (19 patients; 10 female, 9 male) treated with LASIK for refractive error following cataract surgery. The Summit Apex Plus and Ladarvision excimer laser and the SKBM microkeratome were used. The mean age was 63.5 years (range 50 to 88 years). The mean length of follow-up was 8.4 months (range 1 to 12 months) and mean interval between cataract surgery and LASIK was 12 months (range 2.5 to 46 months). RESULTS: The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) for myopic eyes was -3.08 +/- 0.84 diopters (D) (range -4.75 to -2.00 D) and for hyperopic eyes was +1.82 +/- 1.03 D (range +0.75 to +3.00 D). The mean improvement following LASIK surgery was greater for myopic than hyperopic eyes (myopic, 2.54 +/- 1.03 D versus hyperopic, 1.73 +/- 0.62 D; P=.033). The percentage of patients within +/-0.5 D of intended refraction post-LASIK surgery was 83.3% for myopic eyes and 90.9% for hyperopic eyes and all eyes were within +/-1.0 D of intended (P<.001). The percentage of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better in the myopic group improved from none preoperatively to 91.7% postoperatively (P<.001) and in the hyperopic group improved from 27.3% preoperatively to 90.9% postoperatively (P=.008). No eyes lost 2 or more lines of best corrected visual acuity. CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis appears to be effective in correcting refractive error following cataract surgery. Longer-term studies are required to determine refractive stability.     

Phakic refractive lens experience in Spain

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of a phakic refractive lens (PRL) for high myopia and hyperopia. SETTING: Instituto Oftalmológico Hoyos, Barcelona, Spain. METHODS: A PRL was implanted in 31 eyes (17 myopic, 14 hyperopic) with a mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) of -18.46 diopters (D) (range -11.85 to -26.00 D) for myopia and +7.77 D (range +5.25 to +11.00 D) for hyperopia. All eyes had a thorough ophthalmologic examination before and after surgery. The follow-up was at least 12 months. RESULTS: At 1 year, the mean postoperative SE in the myopic group was -0.22 D +/- 0.87 (SD) and 82% were within +/-1.00 D of the desired refraction. The mean postoperative SE in the hyperopic group was -0.38 +/- 0.82 D, and 79% were within +/-1.00 D. Snellen lines of visual acuity were gained in 65% of the myopic eyes (8 eyes gained 1 line, 3 eyes gained 2 lines), and no eye lost lines. In the hyperopic group, 1 eye gained 1 line of acuity and 1 eye lost 1 line. In the hyperopic group, complications included pupillary block in 2 eyes and pigment dispersion signs without intraocular hypertension in 1 eye. In the myopic group, 1 eye had a corticosteroid-induced intraocular pressure rise, 1 eye had a spot of anterior cortical lens opacity immediately after surgery that did not progress, and 3 eyes with the PRL model 100 had decentration that required replacement of the lens. Four patients (2 myopic, 2 hyperopic) reported night halos in both eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that PRL implantation to correct high myopia and hyperopia is a relatively rapid, safe, predictable, and stable method that in many cases also improves the best corrected visual acuity. Complications such as visually significant progressive cataract and pigmentary glaucoma were not observed.     

Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis in eyes with previous radial keratotomy

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with previous radial keratotomy (RK). SETTING: Zale Lipshy University Hospital Laser Center for Vision, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. METHODS: Thirty-eight eyes of 25 patients were treated with LASIK for secondary hyperopia after RK using a Visx Star S2, S3, S4, or LADARVision excimer laser. Retreatment was done in 7 eyes. The main outcome measures were manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), predictability of treatment, and complications. RESULTS: Preoperative mean MRSE was +2.39 diopters (D) +/- 1.28 (SD) (range +0.87 to +6.00 D). At the last visit (25 eyes with minimum follow-up of 12 months, including retreatments), the mean follow-up was 23.3 +/- 7.3 months (range 12 to 34 months), the mean MRSE was +0.11 +/- 0.71 D, and the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 24 eyes (96%). Although no significant change in the mean MRSE was observed, the postoperative mean refractive cylinder showed a gradual increase over the follow-up period. No eye lost more than 2 lines of BSCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis was a safe and effective treatment with good predictability for the correction of consecutive hyperopia after RK. Cylindrical errors were difficult to correct, and astigmatic correction tended to regress over time. Retreatments are safe when old flaps were relifted.     

Early experience with implantable collamer lens in the management of hyperopia after radial keratotomy

PURPOSE: To report the initial experience of the use of implantable collamer lens (ICL) in the management of hyperopia after radial keratotomy (RK). METHODS: Single-center, retrospective chart review. Four eyes of 3 patients with secondary hyperopic shift after myopic RK had a mean spherical equivalent of 5.31 D (range, 3.25-9 D) on presentation. All of them underwent ICL implantation to correct the refractive error. RESULTS: There were no intraoperative complications. At a mean follow-up of 5.5 months (range, 3-7 months), the mean uncorrected visual acuity improved from 20/130 preoperatively to 20/24 postoperatively, and the mean spherical equivalent decreased from 5.31 D preoperatively to 0.08 D postoperatively. At 1-month follow-up, all eyes had an uncorrected visual acuity better than or equal to preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Two eyes were within 0.25 D and all were within 0.5 D of the predicted refractive target. CONCLUSIONS: ICL implantation is an effective surgical option to consider in the management of hyperopia after RK. However, a large cohort and longer follow-up are needed to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of this procedure in this clinical setting.     

Photorefractive keratectomy and LASIK for the correction of hyperopia: 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and LASIK in the correction of hyperopia. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 100 eyes of 56 patients with a mean hyperopia of +2.85 +/- 1.1 diopters (D) undergoing PRK and 100 eyes of 50 patients with a mean hyperopia of +4.49 +/- 1.2 D undergoing LASIK. A Zeiss Meditec MEL 70 G scan laser was used. RESULTS: After 24-month follow-up in the PRK group (100 eyes), the mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) was +0.34 +/- 0.92 D (36% +/- 0.5 D). Mean uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.87 +/- 0.1; 8 (8%) eyes gained 1 line, 80 (80%) eyes had no loss or gain of lines, 10 (10%) eyes lost 1 line, and 2 (2%) eyes lost 2 lines. In the LASIK group (100 eyes), at 24-month follow-up, the mean MRSE was +0.29 +/- 0.66 D (70% +/- 0.5 D). Mean UCVA was 0.89 +/- 0.1; 6 (6%) eyes gained 2 lines, 10 (10%) eyes gained 1 line, 78 (78%) eyes had no loss or gain of lines, and 6 (6%) eyes lost 1 line. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy and LASIK were both effective and safe in the correction of hyperopia. However, PRK manifested an initial temporary myopic overshoot followed by a hyperopic regression over 24-month follow-up (P < .01) whereas LASIK was associated with a faster refractive stability.     

Results of photorefractive keratectomy for hyperopia using the VISX star excimer laser system

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety, efficacy, and predictability of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for hyperopic astigmatism of +1.75 to 00 D manifest refractive sphere and up to -2.50 D manifest refractive astigmatism using the VISX Star excimer laser system, version 2.5 software. METHODS: Treatment was performed on 32 eyes of 21 patients. Eighteen of 21 patients were 45 years of age or older. Manifest and cycloplegic refraction together with Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity assessment was performed prior to surgery and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 32 surgical procedures were reviewed 1 year after treatment (84%). Corneal epithelial healing was complete between day 4 and 10. Twelve months after treatment, 25 of 27 eyes (93%) achieved 20/40 or better uncorrected visual acuity and 19 eyes (70%) achieved 20/20. No patient lost two or more lines of Snellen visual acuity assessed 6 months and later after treatment. The mean spherical equivalent refraction was reduced from +2.90 at baseline to +0.10 D at 1 year and +0.40 D at 2 years; 65% of eyes had a refraction within +/- 0.50 D. Four patients had further treatment by laser in situ keratomileusis for undercorrection in three eyes and overcorrection in one eye. Pelli-Robson contrast acuity was significantly reduced 12 months after treatment from a mean 1.72 before to 1.66 after PRK (P = .02, t-test). CONCLUSIONS: PRK for hyperopia using the VISX Star excimer laser system was effective in the treatment of hyperopic astigmatism. Although no patient lost two or more lines of high contrast best spectacle-corrected Snellen visual acuity 1 year after treatment, there was a significant decrease in Pelli-Robson contrast acuity.     

Epithelial scrape for photorefractive keratectomy overcorrection associated with induced regression

PURPOSE: To study the effect of combined corneal epithelial scrape and contact lens wear treatment on regression in eyes with symptomatic overcorrection after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or PRK retreatment. METHODS: Fifteen eyes had corneal epithelial scrape with a scalpel followed by soft contact lens wear for approximately 1 month. Eight of the eyes were treated 3-4 months after the laser procedure, and seven eyes were treated >4 months after laser treatment. Fifteen eyes that had the same level of PRK correction and monitored during the same interval after PRK were used as matched control eyes. RESULTS: Epithelial scrape was performed for mean spherical equivalent (SE) of +1.1+/-0.4 diopters (D) (range, +0.50 to +1.75 D) at mean 6.1+/-3.2 months after PRK or PRK retreatment. The SE in these eyes was +0.5+/-0.6 D (range, -0.25 to +1.25 D) 3 months after epithelial scrape and +0.4+/-0.5 D (range, -0.75 to +1.25 D) 6 months after scrape. The change in scraped eyes at 3 and 6 months compared to before scrape was statistically significant (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). The change in mean SE at 6 months after scrape (-0.7+/-0.5 D) was significantly different than the change noted in matched control eyes that were not scraped (-0.1+/-0.2 D) over the same interval after the PRK or PRK retreatment procedure. The change in SE at 6 months after epithelial scrape was greater for the eyes scraped 4 months or less (mean, 3.6+/-0.5 months) after PRK (-0.9+/-0.3 D) than eyes scraped >4 months (9.0+/-2.6 months) after PRK (-0.4+/-0.5 D). This difference approached statistical significance (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Epithelial scrape and soft contact lens treatment for symptomatic overcorrection after PRK may induce regression and is more likely to be effective when performed <4 months after the primary PRK or PRK retreatment procedure.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus lens-based surgery for correcting residual refractive error after cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus lens-based surgery (intraocular lens [IOL] exchange or piggyback IOL) for correcting residual refractive error after cataract surgery. SETTING: Private eye center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. METHODS: This retrospective study included 57 eyes of 48 patients who had LASIK (28 eyes) or lens-based correction (29 eyes) for residual refractive error after cataract surgery. The visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 20 to 24 months. RESULTS: In the LASIK group, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was reduced from -1.62 +/- 0.80 diopters (D) preoperatively to +0.05 +/- 0.38 D postoperatively in myopic eyes and from +0.51 +/- 1.25 D to +0.19 +/- 0.35 D in hyperopic eyes. Ninety-two percent of eyes were within +/-0.50 D of intended correction. In the lens group, the mean SE was reduced from -3.55 +/- 2.69 D preoperatively to -0.20 +/- 0.50 D postoperatively in myopic eyes and from +2.07 +/- 2.38 D to +0.07 +/- 0.85 D in hyperopic eyes. Eighty-one percent of eyes had postoperative SE within +/-0.50 D of the intended correction. The UCVA improved significantly in both groups. No eye lost more than 1 line of BSCVA. With a similar length of follow-up, no significant difference in postoperative SE was found between the 2 groups (P = .453). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed efficacy, safety, predictability, and merits of LASIK and lens-based approaches for correcting different types of residual refractive error after cataract surgery.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for residual myopia after radial keratotomy and photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual outcome, stability, and complications of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for residual myopia after radial keratotomy (RK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: Dr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital, Chennai, India. METHODS: Twenty eyes that had LASIK treatment for residual myopia after RK (10 eyes) or PRK (10 eyes) were retrospectively analyzed. Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed after a mean period of 24.3 months +/- 0.75 (SD) in the RK group and 22.0 +/- 1.07 months in the PRK group. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, the mean spherical equivalent was reduced from -6.05 +/- 1.98 diopters (D) to -1.26 +/- 0.32 D (P <.05) in the RK group and from -3.38 +/- 1.30 D to -0.55 +/- 0.40 D (P <.005) in the PRK group. The mean uncorrected visual acuity improved from 20/300 (range 20/600 to 20/200) to 20/40 (range 20/60 to 20/20) (P <.05) and from 20/200 (range 20/800 to 20/80) to 20/25 (range 20/40 to 20/20) (P <.05), respectively. Two eyes in the RK group and 3 in the PRK group gained 1 line of best corrected visual acuity, and 2 eyes in the RK group lost 1 line. No sight-threatening complications such as a free flap, corneal ectasia, or a retinal complication occurred. There was no statistically significant difference in corneal haze before and after LASIK. Two eyes in the RK group required repositioning of the flap because of irregular apposition to the stromal bed. CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis was safe, effective, and stable in the treatment of residual myopia after RK and PRK.     

Long-term follow-up of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis correction using the Star S2 excimer laser

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the safety, efficacy, predictability, and long-term stability of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the Star S2 excimer laser (Visx). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA. METHODS: This study evaluated 41 eyes of 27 patients who had LASIK for the correction of spherical hyperopia. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on preoperative cycloplegic refraction: low hyperopia (less than +2.00 diopters [D]), medium hyperopia (+2.00 to +4.00 D), and high hyperopia (more than +4.00 D). RESULTS: In all eyes, the mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was +2.53 D (range +0.75 to +5.25 D) and the mean attempted SE was +2.58 D (range +0.75 to +5.25 D). At the last visit (mean 5.29 years), the mean SE was +0.44 D +/- 0.69 (SD) in the low hyperopia group, +0.58 +/- 0.56 D in the medium hyperopia group, and +0.59 +/- 1.18 D in the high hyperopia group. The percentage of eyes within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia was 82.4%, 75.0%, and 66.7%, respectively (68.9% overall). The uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 100% of eyes in the low hyperopia group, 91.7% in the medium hyperopia group, and 66.7% in the high hyperopia group (87.8% overall). The hyperopic shift between 1 year and the last visit was +0.18 D, +0.30 D, and +0.55 D, respectively (+0.40 D overall; range -1.25 to +2.63 D). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperopic LASIK using the Star S2 excimer laser was safe, effective, and predictable for hyperopia up to +4.10 D (mean of high group). A mild regression of the refractive effect was seen over the 5-year follow-up.     

Evaluation of photorefractive keratectomy retreatments after regressed myopic laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) enhancements in eyes previously treated by myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) showing an undercorrection due to either a refractive regression or a primary undercorrection, when an in-the-bed enhancement was not advisable because of residual stromal thickness limitations. DESIGN: Noncomparative, prospective, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen eyes of 17 patients previously treated by LASIK for a spherical equivalent (SE) correction of -8.125 to -12.50 diopters (D; mean, -9.45 +/- 1.01 D), that after a follow-up of 6 to 14 months ended up with a refraction of -1.50 to -3.75 D (SE; mean, -2.48 +/- 0.74 D). Intended flap thickness was 160 microm for all eyes. In all cases, the residual stromal bed under the flap was considered too thin (255-305 microm) to allow an in-the-bed enhancement without exceeding an assumed safety thickness limit (250 microm). INTERVENTION: Eyes were treated by PRK at least 6 months after LASIK. The PRK ablation parameters (diameter, attempted correction) were selected to avoid theoretical flap perforation. The deepest ablation was 60 microm, for a -3.75-D correction. We used a Bausch & Lomb 217 C excimer laser (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Refraction, uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit-lamp evidence of corneal opacity or other visible complications, and corneal topography. RESULTS: Although the initial postoperative period was characterized by very satisfactory refractive results (mean SE error at 1 month, -0.04 +/- 0.37 D; range, +0.75 to -0.625 D), during follow-up, a dense haze (grade 3 and 4) developed in 14 eyes (82.3%) that induced a further myopic regression (SE, -1.725 to -5.50 D; mean, -3.11 D) and BCVA loss (two to six lines). These 14 eyes underwent a further surgical treatment to remove the severe haze at 3 to 10 months after PRK. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, we strongly advise against PRK as a possible option to correct eyes previously treated by myopic LASIK that resulted in an undercorrection.     

Arcuate transverse keratotomy remains a useful adjunct to correct astigmatism in conjunction with photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of paired, arcuate transverse keratotomy (Arc-T) performed prior to or after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to correct low to moderate amounts of natural or laser-induced astigmatism. METHODS: Spherical PRK was performed in 730 eyes for myopia of -1.00 to -7.00 D. PRK with arcuate transverse keratotomy was performed in 150 of these eyes; we studied 123 eyes that did not have PRK enhancement. Arc-T was performed prior to PRK in all 37 study eyes with astigmatism of 1.50 D or more at the preoperative examination. Arc-T keratotomy was performed after PRK in 86 study eyes for residual astigmatism of +0.75 D or more and uncorrected visual acuity of 20/30 or worse. RESULTS: Arc-T before PRK group: PRK was performed at a mean 1.0 +/- 1.5 months after Arc-T. Mean astigmatism decreased from +2.40 +/- 0.6 D (range, 1.00 to 4.00 D) before Arc-T to 0.60 +/- 0.60 D (range, 0 to 2.25 D) after Arc-T (P < .0001). Net change in astigmatism was 1.80 +/- 0.60 D (range, 0.80 to 2.80 D) and mean reduction was 75%. Spherical equivalent refraction changed from -4.10 +/- 1.90 D (range, -0.25 to -8.10 D) to -4.40 +/- 1.80 D after Arc-T (P = .002). Mean change in spherical equivalent refraction after Arc-T was -0.30 +/- 0.50 D (range, -1.10 to +0.40 D). Arc-T after PRK group: Arc-T was performed at a mean 3.5 +/- 1.9 months after PRK. Six months after Arc-T, astigmatism was decreased from +1.50 +/- 0.60 D to 0.40 +/- 0.40 D (P = .04). Net change in astigmatism at 6 months was 1.10 +/- 0.60 D and mean reduction was 74%. Vector change in astigmatism magnitude was 1.30 +/- 0.60 D (range, 0 to 4.00 D) at 6 months and vector change in astigmatism axis was 65 degrees +/- 68 degrees. Spherical equivalent refraction did not change when Arc-T was performed after PRK for eyes with low astigmatism (P = .4). Arc-T retreatment was performed in 6 of 37 (16%) eyes that had Arc-T before PRK and 18 of 86 (21%) eyes that had Arc-T after PRK (P = .12). CONCLUSION: Arcuate transverse keratotomy performed prior to PRK for high astigmatism or after PRK for lower levels of residual astigmatism effectively improved visual outcome. Coupling was less predictable for high levels of astigmatism correction with Arc-T.     

Apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar after retreatment in hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To report a complication, apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar, that can occur after hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) retreatment. SETTING: Istanbul University Eye Research Center, Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: Twelve eyes of 6 patients with apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar were retrospectively studied. Mean age of the 5 men and 1 woman was 30.2 years +/- 5.4 (SD). All eyes had hyperopic PRK retreatment for regression 9.5 +/- 1.44 months after primary hyperopic PRK. Mean spherical equivalent refraction of the residual hyperopia before retreatment was +4.67 +/- 0.81 diopters (D). All patients had a corneal haze grade of less than 1+. Hyperopic PRK retreatment was performed with a 193 nm excimer laser (Chiron Technolas Keracor 116). RESULTS: Apical nodular subepithelial corneal scars developed within the first month of hyperopic PRK retreatment and progressed until the third month in 12 eyes of 6 patients. The lesion was round and symmetrical in both eyes, smaller than 2.0 mm, and centrally located. During the mean 40.66 +/- 2.46 month follow-up, the lesion did not change in size or density. Mean spherical equivalent refraction after retreatment was 2.88 +/- 0.88 D (range +1.50 to +4.00 D) at 1 month and +4.36 +/- 1.83 D at last follow-up. Refraction was unmeasurable in 3 eyes. Five eyes lost 1 line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and 7 eyes, 2 or more lines. The surface regularity indexes were higher than 2.00 in all the eyes. CONCLUSION: Hyperopic PRK retreatment may cause the sight-threatening complication of apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar. This complication behaves unlike corneal haze and does not resolve spontaneously over time.