Estrogen receptor status could modulate the genomic pattern in familial and sporadic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Familial breast cancer represents 5% to 10% of all breast tumors. Mutations in the two known major breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, account for a minority of familial breast cancer, whereas families without mutations in these genes (BRCAX group) account for 70% of familial breast cancer cases. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To better characterize and define the genomic differences between the three classes of familial tumors and sporadic malignancies, we have analyzed 19 BRCA1, 24 BRCA2, and 31 BRCAX samples from familial breast cancer patients and 19 sporadic breast tumors using a 1-Mb resolution bacterial artificial chromosome array-based comparative genomic hybridization. RESULTS: We found that BRCA1/2 tumors showed a higher genomic instability than BRCAX and sporadic cancers. There were common genomic alterations present in all breast cancer groups, such as gains of 1q and 16p or losses of 8ptel-p12 and 16q. We found that the presence/absence of the estrogen receptor (ER) may play a crucial role in driving tumor development through distinct genomic pathways independently of the tumor type (sporadic or familial) and mutation status (BRCA1 or BRCA2). ER(-) tumors presented higher genomic instability and different altered regions than ER+ ones. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, the BRCA gene mutation status (mainly BRCA1) would contribute to the genomic profile of abnormalities by increasing or modulating the genome instability.     

Short telomeres are frequent in hereditary breast tumors and are associated with high tumor grade

Telomere shortening is a common event involved in malignant transformation. Critically short telomeres may trigger chromosomal aberrations and produce genomic instability leading to cancer development. Therefore, telomere shortening is a frequent molecular alteration in early stages of many epithelial tumors and in breast cancer correlates with stage and prognosis. A better understanding of the involvement of short telomeres in tumors may have a significant impact on patient management and the design of more specific treatments. To understand the role of telomere length (TL) in breast cancer etiology we measured the length of individual telomere signals in single cells by using quantitative telomere in situ hybridization in paraffin-embedded tissue from hereditary and sporadic breast cancers. A total of 104 tumor tissue samples from 75 familial breast tumors (BRCA1, n = 14; BRCA2, n = 13; non-BRCA1/2, n = 48) and 29 sporadic tumors were analyzed. Assessment of telomere signal intensity allowed estimation of the mean TL and related variables, such as percentage of critically short telomeres and percentage of cells with short telomeres. These data were correlated with the immunohistochemical expression of molecular breast cancer markers. Hereditary BRCA1, BRCA2, and non-BRCA1/2 tumors were characterized by shorter TL comparing to sporadic tumors. Considering all tumors, tumor grade was a strong risk factor determining the proportion of short telomeres or short telomere cells. Moreover, some histopathological features appeared to be differentially associated to hereditary or sporadic subgroups. Short telomeres correlated with ER-negative tumors in sporadic cases but not in familial cases, whereas a high level of apoptosis was associated with shorter telomeres in hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors. In addition, TL helped to define a subset of non-BRCA1/2 tumors with short telomeres associated with increased expression of antiapoptotic proteins. These findings highlight the potential interest of TL measurements as markers of aggressiveness in breast cancer.     

Distinct genomic profiles in hereditary breast tumors identified by array-based comparative genomic hybridization

Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for a significant proportion of hereditary breast cancers. Earlier studies have shown that inherited and sporadic tumors progress along different somatic genetic pathways and that global gene expression profiles distinguish between these groups. To determine whether genomic profiles similarly discriminate among BRCA1, BRCA2, and sporadic tumors, we established DNA copy number profiles using comparative genomic hybridization to BAC-clone microarrays providing <1 Mb resolution. Tumor DNA was obtained from BRCA1 (n = 14) and BRCA2 (n = 12) mutation carriers, as well as sporadic cases (n = 26). Overall, BRCA1 tumors had a higher frequency of copy number alterations than sporadic breast cancers (P = 0.00078). In particular, frequent losses on 4p, 4q, and 5q in BRCA1 tumors and frequent gains on 7p and 17q24 in BRCA2 tumors distinguish these from sporadic tumors. Distinct amplicons at 3q27.1-q27.3 were identified in BRCA1 tumors and at 17q23.3-q24.2 in BRCA2 tumors. A homozygous deletion on 5q12.1 was found in a BRCA1 tumor. Using a set of 169 BAC clones that detect significantly (P < 0.001) different frequencies of copy number changes in inherited and sporadic tumors, these could be discriminated into separate groups using hierarchical clustering. By comparing DNA copy number and RNA expression for genes in these regions, several candidate genes affected by up- or down-regulation were identified. Moreover, using support vector machines, we correctly classified BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors (P < 0.0000004 and 0.00005, respectively). Further validation may prove this tumor classifier to be useful for selecting familial breast cancer cases for further mutation screening, particularly, as these data can be obtained using archival tissue.     

Reduced Fhit expression in sporadic and BRCA2-linked breast carcinomas.

Evidence for alteration of the FHIT gene in a significant fraction of breast carcinomas has been reported, in apparent concordance with loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at chromosome region 3p14.2 in breast cancer and benign proliferative breast disease. A significantly higher frequency of LOH at the FHIT locus was reported for BRCA2-/- tumors, possibly due to misrepaired double-strand breaks at this common fragile region. To determine whether such genomic alterations lead to Fhit inactivation, we have assessed the level of Fhit expression by immunohistochemical detection in sporadic tumors and cancers occurring in BRCA2 999del5 carriers. To determine whether Fhit inactivation may have prognostic significance, we have also assessed expression of breast cancer markers and clinical features in sporadic tumors relative to Fhit expression. Of 40 consecutive sporadic breast carcinomas studied for tumor markers, 50% showed reduced Fhit expression. In these sporadic cancers, loss of Fhit expression was not correlated significantly with the presence or absence of other tumor markers. In a study of 58 sporadic and 34 BRCA2 999del5 Icelandic invasive cancers, there was a significant association of LOH at 3p14.2 with reduced expression of Fhit (P = 0.001); also the lower expression of Fhit and higher LOH at 3p14.2 in BRCA2 999del5 tumors relative to sporadic cancers was significant (P = 0.002). Thus, genetic alteration at the fragile site within the FHIT gene leads to loss of Fhit protein in a significant fraction of sporadic breast cancers and a much larger fraction of familial breast cancers with an inherited BRCA2 mutation, consistent with the idea that loss of BRCA2 function affects stability of the FHIT/FRA3B locus.     

Mammary tumors in mice conditionally mutant for Brca1 exhibit gross genomic instability and centrosome amplification yet display a recurring distribution of genomic imbalances that is similar to human breast cancer

BRCA1 mutation carriers have an increased susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. Excision of exon 11 of Brca1 in the mouse, using a conditional knockout (Cre-loxP) approach, results in mammary tumor formation after long latency. To characterize the genomic instability observed in these tumors, to establish a comparative map of chromosomal imbalances and to contribute to the validation of this mouse model of breast cancer, we have characterized chromosomal imbalances and aberrations using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), and spectral karyotyping (SKY). We found that all tumors exhibit chromosome instability as evidenced by structural chromosomal aberrations and aneuploidy, yet they display a pattern of chromosomal gain and loss that is similar to the pattern in human breast carcinomas. Of note, nine of 15 tumors exhibited a gain of distal chromosome 11, a region that is orthologous to human chromosome 17q11-qter, the mapping position of Erbb2. However, our analysis suggests that genes distal to Erbb2 are the main targets of amplification. Four of the tumors also exhibited a copy number loss of proximal chromosome 11 (11A-B), a region orthologous to human 17p. In eight of the tumors we observed whole or partial gain of chromosome 15 centering on 15D2-D3 (orthologous to human chromosome 8q24), the map location of the c-Myc gene, and six of the tumors exhibited copy number loss of whole or partial chromosome 14, including 14D3, the map location of Rb1. We conclude that despite the tremendous shuffling of chromosomes during the course of mammalian evolution, the pattern of genomic imbalances is conserved between BRCA1-associated mammary gland tumors in mice and humans. Western blot analysis showed that while p53 is absent or mutated in some tumors, at least two tumors revealed wild-type protein, suggesting that other genetic events may lead to tumorigenesis. Similar to BRCA1-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts, the tumor cells contained supernumerary functional centrosomes with intact centrioles whose presence results in multipolar mitoses and aneuploidy.     

Widespread bimodal intrachromosomal genomic instability in sporadic breast cancers associated with 13q allelic imbalance

Genomic instability is thought to underlie tumor progression in solid tumors, such as breast cancer. Although evidence that the hereditary breast cancer genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, are involved in DNA repair suggests that genomic instability plays an important role in hereditary breast tumorigenesis, genomic instability remains poorly characterized in sporadic breast cancers. Using a DNA fingerprinting technique, inter-(simple sequence repeat) PCR (inter-SSR PCR), the degree of genomic instability was quantified in 47 sporadic breast cancers compared with matched adjacent normal breast tissues. Almost all sporadic breast cancers show significant genomic instability by inter-SSR PCR. The distribution of this instability is bimodal; 57% of the tumors show fewer changes, whereas 43% show striking genomic alterations. Further analysis of two inter-SSR PCR tumor-normal differences revealed a genomic amplification and probable deletion. Thus, inter-SSR PCR can detect chromosomal breakage-related genomic alterations in most sporadic breast cancers. Genomic instability as detected by inter-SSR PCR is not correlated with aneuploidy, suggesting that this technique preferentially detects intrachromosomal alterations. Chromosomal instability in breast cancer can therefore be subdivided into at least two groups: (a) intrachromosomal and (b) gross chromosomal. Allelic imbalance at markers at the 13q13 and retinoblastoma loci (13q) and not at 17q loci was significantly associated with high levels of intrachromosomal instability, suggesting genes at 13q13 and retinoblastoma loci are either selectively targeted or involved in the genesis of genomic instability in sporadic breast cancers.     

A 1 Mb minimal amplicon at 8p11-12 in breast cancer identifies new candidate oncogenes

Amplification of 8p11-12 is a well-known alteration in human breast cancers but the driving oncogene has not been identified. We have developed a high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization array covering 8p11-12 and analysed 33 primary breast tumors, 20 primary ovarian tumors and 27 breast cancer cell lines. Expression analysis of the genes in the region was carried out by using real-time quantitative PCR and/or oligo-microarray profiling. In all, 24% (8/33) of the breast tumors, 5% (1/20) of the ovary tumors and 15% (4/27) of the cell lines showed 8p11-12 amplification. We identified a 1 Mb segment of common amplification that excludes previously proposed candidate genes. Some of the amplified genes did not show overexpression, whereas for others, overexpression was not specifically attributable to amplification. The genes FLJ14299, C8orf2, BRF2 and RAB11FIP, map within the 8p11-12 minimal amplicon, two have a putative function consistent with an oncogenic role, these four genes showed a strong correlation between amplification and overexpression and are therefore the best candidate driver oncogenes at 8p12.     

A non-BRCA1/2 hereditary breast cancer sub-group defined by aCGH profiling of genetically related patients

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 explain approximately 25% of all familial breast cancers. Despite intense efforts to find additional high-risk breast cancer genes (BRCAx) using linkage analysis, none have been reported thus far. Here we explore the hypothesis that BRCAx breast tumors from genetically related patients share a somatic genetic etiology that might be revealed by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) profiling. As BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors can be identified on the basis of specific genomic profiles, the same may be true for a subset of BRCAx families. Analyses used aCGH to compare 58 non-BRCA1/2 familial breast tumors (designated BRCAx) to sporadic (non-familiar) controls, BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors. The selection criteria for BRCAx families included at least three cases of breast cancer diagnosed before the age of 60 in the family, and the absence of ovarian or male breast cancer. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to determine sub-groups within the BRCAx tumor class and family heterogeneity. Analysis of aCGH profiles of BRCAx tumors indicated that they constitute a heterogeneous class, but are distinct from both sporadic and BRCA1/2 tumors. The BRCAx class could be divided into sub-groups. One subgroup was characterized by a gain of chromosome 22. Tumors from family members were classified within the same sub-group in agreement with the hypothesis that tumors from the same family would harbor a similar genetic background. This approach provides a method to target a sub-group of BRCAx families for further linkage analysis studies.     

p53 Inactivation is a Rare Event in Familial Breast Tumors Negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations

Germline mutations at BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes result in susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers. BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated tumors have distinct histologic and molecular phenotypes, as compared to sporadic breast tumors. Typically, a higher grade of malignancy is observed in BRCA-associated cancers. A number of studies have suggested that BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins are of importance in DNA repair and maintenance of genome integrity, bringing about molecular models of tumor pathogenesis. In particular, alterations at p53 gene have been suggested to be a necessary step in the tumorigenesis of BRCA-associated carcinomas. In fact, BRCA-associated breast cancers have higher p53 mutation frequencies than sporadic ones. At present, very little is known regarding BRCA non-associated familial tumors (termed BRCAx tumors). To our knowledge no data is available on p53 alterations in this sub-group of familial tumors. In this study p53 alteration frequencies were evaluated in 13 BRCA1, 11 BRCA2 and 55 BRCAx breast tumors. Tumor samples were analyzed for p53 gene mutations by PCR-SSCP/direct sequencing, and for p53 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Altogether, p53 alterations were detected in 54% of BRCAI tumors compared with 5% of BRCAx tumors. No p53 alteration was found in BRCA2 tumors. While loss of p53 checkpoint control is likely to be an important step in the molecular pathogenesis of BRCA1-associated cancers, our data seem to indicate a p53-independent molecular mechanism underlying BRCAx neoplastic transformation.     

MYC is amplified in BRCA1-associated breast cancers.

PURPOSE: Germ-line mutations in the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene predispose to early onset breast cancers with a distinct phenotype characterized by high tumor grade, aneuploidy, high proliferation rate, and estrogen receptor-negativity. The molecular mechanisms and cooperative oncogenes contributing to multistep tumor progression in cells lacking BRCA1 are not well defined. To examine whether C-MYC (MYC), a transforming oncogene associated with genetic instability, contributes to multistep tumor progression in BRCA1-associated breast cancer, we have analyzed tumors from women with hereditary BRCA1-mutated and sporadic breast cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed fluorescence in situ hybridization using a MYC:CEP8 assay on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues from 40 women with known deleterious germ-line BRCA1 mutations and 62 sporadic cases, including 20 cases with hypermethylation of the BRCA1 gene promoter. RESULTS: We observed a MYC:CEP8 amplification ratio >/=2 in 21 of 40 (53%) BRCA1-mutated tumors compared with 14 of 62 (23%) sporadic tumors (P = 0.003). Of the 14 sporadic cases with MYC amplification, 8 (57%) were BRCA1-methylated. In total, MYC amplification was found in a significantly higher proportion of tumors with BRCA1 dysfunction (29 of 60, 48% versus 6 of 42, 14%; P = 0.0003). In a multivariable regression model controlling for age, tumor size, and estrogen receptor status, BRCA1-mutated tumors demonstrated significantly greater mean MYC:CEP8 ratio than sporadic tumors (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that MYC oncogene amplification contributes to tumor progression in BRCA1-associated breast cancers. Thus, we conclude that the aggressive histopathological features of BRCA1-associated tumors are in part due to dysregulated MYC activity.     

Molecular-cytogenetic analysis of HER-2/neu gene in BRCA1-associated breast cancers

The BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene and the HER-2/neu oncogene are located in close proximity on the long arm of chromosome 17 (17q11-21). Absence of BRCA1 or functional overexpression of the HER-2/neu gene presumably contributes to the somatic phenotype of breast cancer in premenopausal women, characterized by unfavorable prognostic features such as high tumor grade, hormone receptor negativity, and high proliferation rate. To examine whether amplification of HER-2/neu contributes to the aggressive biology of BRCA1-associated tumors, we have performed fluorescence in situ hybridization on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor tissue sections from 53 BRCA1 mutation carriers and 41 randomly selected, age-matched sporadic breast cancer cases. Although BRCA1-associated and sporadic tumors were equally likely (19% versus 22%) to exhibit HER-2/neu amplification [defined as a ratio of HER-2/neu copies to chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) copies > or = 2], 6 (15%) of the sporadic tumors were highly amplified (defined as a ratio greater-than-or-equal 5) versus none of the BRCA1-associated tumors (P = 0.048). HER-2 protein overexpression as measured by immunohistochemical analysis was not observed among the BRCA1-associated cases (P = 0.042). Four of 21 (19%) sporadic tumors exhibited strong membranous staining of HER-2 (intensity level of 3+) as compared with 0 of 39 BRCA1-associated tumors. Our data suggest that a germ-line mutation in the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene is associated with a significantly lower level of HER-2/neu amplification. Thus, it is possible that BRCA1-associated and HER-2/neu-highly amplified tumors progress through distinct molecular pathways, and the aggressive pathological features of BRCA1-associated tumors appear unrelated to amplification of the adjacent HER-2/neu oncogene.     

Genomic and expression analysis of the 8p11-12 amplicon in human breast cancer cell lines

Gene amplification is an important mechanism of oncogene activation in breast and other cancers. Characterization of amplified regions of the genome in breast cancer has led to the identification of important oncogenes including erbB-2/HER-2, C-MYC, and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2. Chromosome 8p11-p12 is amplified in 10-15% of human breast cancers. The putative oncogene FGFR1 localizes to this region; however, we show evidence that FGFR inhibition fails to slow growth of three breast cancer cell lines with 8p11-p12 amplification. We present a detailed analysis of this amplicon in three human breast cancer cell lines using comparative genomic hybridization, traditional Southern and Northern analysis, and chromosome 8 cDNA microarray expression profiling. This study has identified new candidate oncogenes within the 8p11-p12 region, supporting the hypothesis that genes other than FGFR1 may contribute to oncogenesis in breast cancers with proximal 8p amplification.     

Distinct genomic aberration patterns are found in familial breast cancer associated with different immunohistochemical subtypes

Five breast cancer subtypes have been described in sporadic breast cancer (SBC) using expression arrays: basal-like, ERBB2, normal breast-like, luminal A and B. These molecular subtypes show different genomic aberration patterns (GAPs). Recently, our group described these breast cancer subtypes in 50 non-BRCA1/2 familial tumors using immunohistochemistry assays. We extended this study to the other classes of familial breast cancer (FBC), including 62 tumors (18 BRCA1, 16 BRCA2 and 28 non-BRCA1/2), with the same panel of 25 immunohistochemical (IHC) markers and histological grade obtaining a similar classification. We combined these data with results generated by a 1 Mb BAC array-based CGH study to evaluate the genomic aberrations of each group. We found that BRCA1-related tumors are preferentially basal-like, whereas non-BRCA1/2 familial tumors are mainly luminal A subtype. We described distinct GAPs related to each IHC subtype. Basal tumors had a greater number of gains/losses, while luminal B tumors had more high-level DNA amplifications. Our data are similar to those obtained in SBC studies, highlighting the existence of distinct genetic pathways of tumor evolution, common to both SBC and FBC.     

Identification of a 5-cM region of common allelic loss on 8p12-p21 in human breast cancer and genomic analysis of the hEXT1L/EXTR1/EXTL3 gene in this locus.

The short arm of chromosome 8 is frequently lost in many human carcinomas including breast cancer, suggesting the presence of a tumor suppressor gene(s) in this region. We identified a gene termed hEXT1L/EXTR1/EXTL3 (hEXT1L hereinafter) that was mapped to chromosome bands 8p12-p21 where frequent LOHs of this region was reported in breast cancer. The existence of the third breast cancer susceptibility gene was also suggested in this region by linkage analysis. We further performed LOH analysis in 8p12-p21 in 34 breast cancers and identified a 5-cM region of common allelic loss that overlapped with the locus for positive lod score in familial breast cancer. We further analyzed genomic alterations of hEXT1L in tumors in which frequent LOHs of 8p were reported. A total of 327 cancers (313 primary tumors and 14 cancer cell lines) including 22 primary breast cancers were analyzed, but none of the tumors had somatic mutations: only one thyroid cancer patient without any family history of cancer had a 9-bp insertion in the constitutional DNA. These results suggest that mutations of hEXT1L do not play a major role in the development of sporadic cancers including breast cancer, and that other tumor suppressor gene(s) exists in the 5-cM region identified in this study.     

Frequent amplification of chromosomal region 20q12-q13 in ovarian cancer.

DNA amplification at chromosomal region 20q12-q13, which is common in breast cancer, has recently been described also in ovarian tumors. We studied the amplification of the recently identified candidate oncogenes in this region in 24 sporadic, 3 familial and 4 hereditary ovarian carcinomas, and in 8 ovarian cancer cell lines. High-level amplification of at least one of the five nonsyntenic regions at 20q12-q13.2 was found in 13 sporadic (54%) and in all four hereditary tumors. Typically, two or more distinct amplicons (separated by nonamplified DNA) were found coamplified in various combinations. The regions defined by the AIB1 and PTPN1 genes (at 20q12 and 20q13.1, respectively) were amplified in 25% and 29% of the sporadic tumors, also without simultaneous coamplification of other regions. Amplification of AIB1 (a steroid receptor coactivator gene) was associated with estrogen receptor positivity in sporadic ovarian carcinomas (P = 0.01) and showed a tendency to correlate with poor survival of patients. Of the genes amplified in breast cancer, the BTAK gene was amplified in 21%, the MYBL2 gene in 17%, and the ZNF217 gene in 12.5% of the sporadic tumors. The high frequency of gene amplification at 20q12-q13.2 suggests that the genes amplified therein may play a central role in the pathogenesis of sporadic and hereditary ovarian carcinoma.     

Novel genomic rearrangements in the BRCA1 gene detected in Greek breast/ovarian cancer patients

The identification of genomic rearrangements in breast/ovarian cancer families has widened the mutational spectrum of the BRCA1 gene, increasing the number of patients who can benefit from molecular screening. More than 60 different BRCA1 genomic rearrangements with mapped breakpoints have been reported up to date, in all exons of the gene. The proportion of BRCA1 mutations due to genomic rearrangements varies from 8 to 27% in different populations, probably due to both ethnic diversity and the technical approach employed. In order to estimate the contribution of BRCA1 genomic rearrangements to hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) predisposition in Greek families, probands from 95 families with breast/ovarian history but negative for point mutations or small insertions/deletions in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, were screened using Quantitative Multiplex PCR of Short Fluorescent Fragments (QMPSF). Two large deletions of 4.2 and 4.4 kb were identified in exons 20 and 24 respectively. Additional screening, using diagnostic primers for the above deletions in exons 20 and 24, performed on another 86 probands from families with breast/ovarian cancer history and 210 cases of sporadic breast/ovarian cancer resulted in the identification of two more large genomic rearrangements. One, identified in a familial case, identical to the previous exon 24 deletion and a second, identified in a case reported as sporadic, 3.2 kb deletion involving exon 20 and reported elsewhere in another Greek patient. Three out of four genomic rearrangements described in this study were detected in patients who had developed both breast and ovarian cancer; thus suggesting a correlation between the specific phenotype and the high probability of detecting inherited rearrangements in BRCA1.     

A predictor based on the somatic genomic changes of the BRCA1/BRCA2 breast cancer tumors identifies the non-BRCA1/BRCA2 tumors with BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation.

The genetic changes underlying in the development and progression of familial breast cancer are poorly understood. To identify a somatic genetic signature of tumor progression for each familial group, BRCA1, BRCA2, and non-BRCA1/BRCA2 (BRCAX) tumors, by high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization, we have analyzed 77 tumors previously characterized for BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ line mutations. Based on a combination of the somatic genetic changes observed at the six most different chromosomal regions and the status of the estrogen receptor, we developed using random forests a molecular classifier, which assigns to a given tumor a probability to belong either to the BRCA1 or to the BRCA2 class. Because 76.5% (26 of 34) of the BRCAX cases were classified with our predictor to the BRCA1 class with a probability of >50%, we analyzed the BRCA1 promoter region for aberrant methylation in all the BRCAX cases. We found that 15 of the 34 BRCAX analyzed tumors had hypermethylation of the BRCA1 gene. When we considered the predictor, we observed that all the cases with this epigenetic event were assigned to the BRCA1 class with a probability of >50%. Interestingly, 84.6% of the cases (11 of 13) assigned to the BRCA1 class with a probability >80% had an aberrant methylation of the BRCA1 promoter. This fact suggests that somatic BRCA1 inactivation could modify the profile of tumor progression in most of the BRCAX cases.