Familial association of histology specific breast cancers with cancers at other sites

Breast cancer histologies show important differences in their incidence pattern, method of detection and management. Aggregation of breast cancer occurs also in families diagnosed for cancer at sites different from the breast. Therefore, the familial association of histology specific breast cancers with cancers at other sites is of great interest. The nationwide Swedish Family-Cancer Database was used to calculate standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) for breast cancer when parents or sibling were diagnosed with cancer at the most common sites. Significant SIRs were found when parents had breast, ovarian, laryngeal, endometrial, prostate, lung and colon cancers. If women were diagnosed before the age of 50 years, the SIRs were significant when parents were diagnosed with breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers, and leukaemia, and when siblings were diagnosed with squamous cell skin, pancreatic, breast and endometrial cancers. If mothers were diagnosed with breast cancer, histology-specific SIRs were ranked as comedo > tubular > ductal > lobular; SIR for medullary carcinoma was not significant but it was high when mothers presented with ovarian cancer. Other associations were between the upper aerodigestive tract and lobular, colon and comedo, larynx and ductal cancer. Moreover, cervical cancer was associated with comedo and endometrial cancer with the medullary histology. In conclusion, histology-specific breast cancers were associated with specific cancer sites and the strength of the association varied among histologies.     

Pediatric leukemia in the new millennium

A number of co-aggregations of cancers at different sites has been reported, including recognized syndromes (e.g., Li-Fraumeni), and aggregations between cancers at breast, stomach and ovary, between cancers at prostate, urinary tract and other sites, as well as between several tobacco-related neoplasms. In a network of case–control studies from Italy and Switzerland, including more than 12,000 cases of 13 different cancers, after controlling for multiple testing, significant associations emerged between oral and pharyngeal cancer and family history of laryngeal cancer (relative risk (RR): 3.3); esophageal cancer and family history of oral and pharyngeal cancer RR: 4.1; breast cancer and family history of colorectal cancer (RR: 1.5) and of hemolymphopoietic cancers (RR: 1.7); ovarian cancer and family history of breast cancer (RR: 2.3); and prostate cancer and family history of bladder cancer (RR: 3.4). Shared exposures to environmental factors within families account for some of the observed aggregations, together with heritable, and hence, genetic factors.     

Birth cohort, time, and age effects in Italian cancer mortality

Italian death certification data from 1955 to 1979 for total cancer mortality and 30 cancer sites in the population aged 25 to 74, were analyzed using a log-linear Poisson model to isolate the effects of birth cohort, calendar period of death, and age. The most frequent cohort pattern was characterized by increases up to the generations born between 1920 and 1930, followed by stabilization or a slight decrease. This pattern was evident for total cancer mortality in men, and for several common sites, including larynx, lung, esophagus, bladder, female breast, and ovary. Only four sites (pancreas, pleura, intestines in both sexes, and kidney in men) showed cohort values still rising in more recent generations. Stable cohort and period of death curves were observed for cancers of the prostate and testis, whereas trends were steadily going down for neoplasms of the stomach, and (cervix) uteri. Finally, there were a few discontinuous trends (e.g., in the case of brain neoplasms, leukemias, and lymphomas), which probably reflect different effects of improvements in diagnosis and/or treatment. Period of death values increased for lung and other tobacco related sites (chiefly in males) and, up to the early 1970s, for a few other common sites, including intestines, and the female breast. Downward trends over the calendar period were evident for cancers of the stomach and of the (cervix) uteri. Therefore, total cancer mortality trends over the calendar period of death were moderately increasing for men, and slightly decreasing for women.     

Familial cancer risks in offspring from discordant parental cancers

Analysis of familial cancer risks between discordant sites provides etiologic understanding on genetic and environmental risks factors of site-specific cancers. We used the Swedish nation-wide Family-Cancer Database to analyze familial risks in discordant cancers of offspring and parents. Familial risk ratios (FRRs) were calculated for cancer in offspring aged 15 to 53 years at 22 sites, discordant from parental sites. We confirmed many reported associations. Consistent novel findings associated parental-offspring sites of pancreas-breast, breast-testis and uterus-nervous system. For these, the FRRs were modest, 1.2 to 1.5 in the whole Database, but the FRRs increased in those whose parents were diagnosed before age 50. Pancreas and liver cancers showed FRRs of 2.5 to 3.3 in offspring of women and of 1.3 in offspring of men. One or both of these cancers was/were associated with cancers of stomach, colon, breast, uterus, ovary and prostate. Melanoma was associated with pancreas, breast, skin and nervous-system cancers and with leukemias. Myeloma showed a concordant FRR of about 4.0 and was associated with prostate cancer and non-thyroid endocrine-gland cancers. Mutations in known cancer-related genes may explain some of these findings, but new susceptibility genes are yet to be found. For melanoma, pancreatic and liver cancer, environmental factors are important etiologic factors and may contribute to the familial effects observed.     

Aspirin and cancer risk: a quantitative review to 2011

BackgroundAspirin has been associated to a reduced risk of colorectal and possibly of a few other common cancers.MethodsTo provide an up-to-date quantification of this association, we conducted a meta-analysis of all observational studies on aspirin and 12 selected cancer sites published up to September 2011.ResultsRegular aspirin is associated with a statistically significant reduced risk of colorectal cancer [summary relative risk (RR) from random effects models = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–0.79], and of other digestive tract cancers (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.50–0.76, for squamous cell esophageal cancer; RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.52–0.78, for esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma; and RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.54–0.83, for gastric cancer), with somewhat stronger reductions in risk in case–control than in cohort studies. Modest inverse associations were also observed for breast (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85–0.95) and prostate cancer (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85–0.96), while lung cancer was significantly reduced in case–control studies (0.73, 95% CI = 0.55–0.98) but not in cohort ones (RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.92–1.05). No meaningful overall associations were observed for cancers of the pancreas, endometrium, ovary, bladder, and kidney.ConclusionsObservational studies indicate a beneficial role of aspirin on colorectal and other digestive tract cancers; modest risk reductions were also observed for breast and prostate cancer. Results are, however, heterogeneous across studies and dose–risk and duration–risk relationships are still unclear.     

Effect of familial history and smoking on common cancer risks in Japan

BACKGROUND: Inherited genetic predispositions are important risk factors for the development of cancer in general. To determine genetic susceptibility for 14 common cancers, a case-control study of the impact of a family history of cancer in first-degree relatives was conducted. The authors further evaluated the effect modification by habitual smoking with adjustment for other confounding environmental factors. METHODS: In total, 18,836 cancer cases and 28,125 age-matched and sex-matched controls, confirmed as being free of cancer, were recruited. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were determined by multiple logistic regression analysis, including stratification by family history for 14 cancer sites and interactions with a smoking history. RESULTS: The associations between family history and risk of cancer were generally stronger at the same sites than across cancer sites. Risks to first-degree relatives at the same sites were found to be significantly elevated with 8 of 14 cancer sites; especially high ORs were found for prostate and thyroid cancers. Some across-site associations were observed; in particular, a reciprocal association between breast and prostate cancer was found. The interaction between family history and smoking history for breast cancer was found to be statistically significant. There was no statistical evidence for the interactions in other sites, but among subjects with a family history, the ORs were found to be higher in smokers compared with nonsmokers. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study support the hypothesis of a genetic susceptibility to cancers in family members. For breast cancer, the interaction between family history and smoking history was observed to be significant.     

Cancer survival among First Nations people of Ontario,Canada (1968–2007)

We aimed to compare cancer survival in Ontario First Nations people to that in other Ontarians for five major cancer types: colorectal, lung, cervix, breast and prostate. A list of registered or “Status” Indians in Ontario was used to create a cohort of over 140,000 Ontario First Nations people. Cancers diagnosed in cohort members between 1968 and 2001 were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry, with follow‐up for death until December 31st, 2007. Flexible parametric modeling of the hazard function was used to compare the survival experience of the cohort to that of other Ontarians. We considered changes in survival from the first half of the time period (1968–1991) to the second half (1992–2001). For other Ontarians, survival had improved over time for every cancer site. For the First Nations cohort, survival improved only for breast and prostate cancers; it either declined or remained unchanged for the other cancers. For cancers diagnosed in 1992 or later, all‐cause and cause‐specific survival was significantly poorer for First Nations people diagnosed with breast, prostate, cervical, colorectal (male and female) and male lung cancers as compared to their non‐First Nations peers. For female lung cancer, First Nations women appeared to have poorer survival; however, the result was not statistically significant. Ontario's First Nations population experiences poorer cancer survival when compared to other Ontarians and strategies to reduce these inequalities must be developed and implemented.     

A cohort study of cancer risk in relation to family histories of cancer in the Utah population database

BACKGROUND: It is well known that genetic variability affects the risk of many cancers, but details of the patterning of inherited cancer risk across different sites and age groups still are not well quantified. METHODS: The authors conducted a nested case-control study of the familial risk of 40 cancers based on a cohort of 662,515 individuals from the Utah Population Database. From 1 to 10 controls selected from the cohort were matched individually on gender, birth year, and birthplace to each cancer case; and familial standardized incidence ratios (FSIR) were calculated for both cases and controls. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate relative risks and population-attributable risks (PARs) of cancer in relation to FSIR. Relative risks of cancer in first-degree through fifth-degree relatives of cases, compared with controls, were calculated using the proportional hazards methods. All analyses were adjusted for spouse affection status and Latter Day Saints church affiliation. RESULTS: Thirty-five of 40 cancers exhibited positive associations between risk and FSIR, and 21 of those associations were statistically significant. PAR estimates were strikingly high for prostate carcinoma (57%), breast carcinoma (39%), colon carcinoma (32%), lip carcinoma (31%), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (35%), and melanoma (32%). Both the proportion and the number of all cancers attributable to family history peaked at 32% in the group ages 65-84 years and remained high in the group age >/= 85 years. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial portion of cancer risk was attributable to familial factors. The patterns of familial cancer recurrence among distant relatives suggested that simple genetic mechanisms may explain much of the familiality of cancer.     

Do discordant cancers share familial susceptibility?

AimsCancer syndromes manifest at many sites albeit with variable penetrance. Genome-wide association (GWA) studies have identified susceptibility loci shared by many types of cancer. Yet, a population level search for shared susceptibility between discordant cancers has been hampered because of lacking population sizes.MethodsOver 1.1 million patients in the nation-wide Swedish Family-Cancer Database were analysed for discordant familial cancers covering 33 sites. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated for patients whose family members had a defined cancer compared to those whose family members did not have that cancer. Three independent tests for each pair of cancer sites were done using different family relationships.ResultsLung cancer showed 13 significant discordant associations but most of them were with sites for which smoking is a risk factor. An exception was the clustering of lung cancer and endocrine cancers. Four discordant associations reached a minimal significance level of 5 × 10^–6: colorectum–endometrium, breast–ovary, breast–prostate and melanoma–squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. The association of melanoma and nervous system cancer reached a minimal significance of 10⁻⁴. Discarding lung cancer, all other associations were based on a single test whereby they were liable to be chance associations.ConclusionsThis study showed the extraordinary requirements for statistical power in study of multiple cancer sites. In addition to the smoking related sites, associations between breast and prostate cancers, melanoma and nervous system tumours and lung and endocrine tumours found strong statistical support. Within the present sample size limits, we found no evidence of an overall susceptibility to cancer.     

A Review of Cohort Studies on the Association Between History of Diabetes Mellitus and Occurrence of Cancer

We conducted a review of previous cohort studies on the association between a history of diabetes mellitus ‍(DM) and the occurrence of cancer. We limited the papers to those concerning cohort studies on 9 cancer sites, ‍i.e. the kidney, liver, biliary tract, pancreas, colon or rectum, prostate, breast, endometrium, and ovary, in ‍addition to all cancers. With regard to kidney, liver, biliary tract, pancreatic, colorectal, breast, and endometrial ‍cancers, the risk of cancer development has been consistently reported to be positively associated with DM by ‍two or more cohort studies. In contrast, DM was shown to relate negatively to the risk of prostate cancer by ‍two cohort studies. However, there were no cohort studies which showed an either significantly positive or ‍negative association of DM with ovarian cancer. Elevated levels of insulin or IGFs among DM patients have ‍been proposed as a causal mechanism of increased risk for most of the reviewed cancers. In addition, increased ‍estrogen levels in DM patients have been suggested to explain the casual mechanism of increased risk for ‍kidney, breast and endometrial cancers, and decreased risk for prostate cancer. On the other hand, the ‍possibility of detection bias has been suggested in the association of DM with the risk of most of these cancers. ‍Obesity and heavy consumption of alcohol have been indicated as confounding factors in the relationship of ‍DM to the risk for some of them. Thus, further studies are necessary for firm conclusions regarding the ‍association of DM with cancer risk.     

Birth order, family size, and the risk of cancer in young and middle-aged adults

We used the Swedish Family-Cancer Database to analyse the effects of birth order and family size on the risk of common cancers among offspring born over the period 1958-96. Some 1.38 million offspring up to age 55 years with 50.6 million person-years were included. Poisson regression analysis included age at diagnosis, birth cohort, socio-economic status and region of residence as other explanatory variables. The only significant associations were an increasing risk for breast cancer by birth order and a decreasing risk for melanoma by birth order and, particularly, by family size. When details of the women's own reproductive history were included in analysis, birth orders 5-17 showed a relative risk of 1.41. The effects on breast cancer may be mediated through increasing birth weight by birth order. For melanoma, socio-economic factors may be involved, such as limited affordability of sun tourism in large families. Testis cancer showed no significant effect and prostate cancer was excluded from analysis because of the small number of cases.     

Serum total thiol levels and the risk of lung,colorectal, breast and prostate cancer: A prospective case–cohort study

Free thiol groups of intra and extracellular molecules are considered to be antioxidative and to protect cells from damage caused by free radicals. However, the associations of serum total thiol levels (TTL) with the incidences of the four most frequent cancer sites have not yet been investigated in a large population-based, prospective study. TTL was measured in case–cohort design in a sample from the population-based, Norwegian Tromsø 3 study (cancer cases: n = 941; random subcohort: n = 1,000) and was repeatedly measured at Tromsø 5. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated by weighted multivariable-adjusted Cox regression with time-dependent modeling of TTL for incident lung, colorectal, breast and prostate cancer. High serum TTL were associated with a reduced risk of all four major cancers. The associations with lung (top vs. bottom tertile: HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41, 0.99) and breast cancer (top vs. bottom tertile: HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42, 0.96) were statistically significant, whereas associations with colorectal (top vs. bottom tertile: HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.54, 1.16) and prostate cancer (top vs. bottom tertile: HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.53, 1.17) were not statistically significant but pointed in the same protective direction. These findings from a large, prospective Norwegian cohort study suggest a preventive role of thiols against the development of the four most frequent cancers. Whereas associations with breast and lung cancer could be shown with statistical significance, larger studies are needed to corroborate potential associations of TTL with colorectal and prostate cancer.     

Risk of prostate, breast and colorectal cancer after skin cancer diagnosis

Ultraviolet radiation is the major cause of skin cancer, but promotes vitamin D synthesis, and vitamin D has been inversely related to the risk of several common cancers including prostate, breast and colorectum. We therefore computed the incidence of prostate, breast and colorectal cancer following skin cancer using the datasets of the Swiss cancer Registries of Vaud and Neuchatel. Between 1974 and 2005, 6,985 histologically confirmed squamous cell skin cancers, 21,046 basal cell carcinomas and 3,346 cutaneous malignant melanomas were registered, and followed up to the end of 2005 for the occurrence of second primary cancer of the prostate, breast and colorectum. Overall, 680 prostate cancers were observed versus 568.3 expected (standardized incidence ratio (SIR) = 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.29), 440 breast cancers were observed versus 371.5 expected (SIR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.08-1.30) and 535 colorectal cancers were observed versus 464.6 expected (SIR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.06-1.25). When basal cell, squamous cell and skin melanoma were considered separately, all the SIRs for prostate, breast and colorectal cancers were around or slightly above unity. Likewise, the results were consistent across strata of age at skin cancer diagnosis and location (head and neck versus others), and for male and female colorectal cancers. These findings, based on a population with a long tradition of systematic histologic examination of all surgically treated skin lesions, do not support the hypothesis that prostate, breast and colorectal cancer risk is decreased following skin cancer.     

Components of the metabolic syndrome and risk of prostate cancer: the HUNT 2 cohort, Norway

Background

The metabolic syndrome has been suggested as a unifying link between a “western” lifestyle and an increased prostate cancer risk.

Methods

We assessed the associations of components of the metabolic syndrome with prostate cancer in a prospective cohort based on 29,364 Norwegian men followed up for prostate cancer incidence and mortality from 1995–1997 to the end of 2005 in the second Nord Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 2).

Results

During a mean 9.3 years follow-up, 687 incident prostate cancers were diagnosed, and 110 men died from prostate cancer. There was little evidence that baseline BMI, waist circumference, waist–hip ratio, total or HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, presence of the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, antihypertensive use, or cardiovascular disease were associated with incident or fatal prostate cancer. There was weak evidence that raised blood pressure was associated with an increased risk: for each SD (12 mm) increase in diastolic blood pressure, there was an 8% (95% CI = 1–17%; p = 0.04) increased risk of incident prostate cancer.

Conclusions

We found little evidence to support the hypothesis that the metabolic syndrome or its components explains higher prostate cancer mortality rates in countries with a “western” diet and lifestyle. The positive association of blood pressure with prostate cancer warrants further investigation.     

Comparison of anthropometric measures as predictors of cancer incidence: A pooled collaborative analysis of 11 Australian cohorts

Obesity is a risk factor for cancer. However, it is not known if general adiposity, as measured by body mass index (BMI) or central adiposity [e.g., waist circumference (WC)] have stronger associations with cancer, or which anthropometric measure best predicts cancer risk. We included 79,458 men and women from the Australian and New Zealand Diabetes and Cancer Collaboration with complete data on anthropometry [BMI, WC, Hip Circumference (HC), WHR, waist to height ratio (WtHR), A Body Shape Index (ABSI)], linked to the Australian Cancer Database. Cox proportional hazards models assessed the association between each anthropometric marker, per standard deviation and the risk of overall, colorectal, post‐menopausal (PM) breast, prostate and obesity‐related cancers. We assessed the discriminative ability of models using Harrell's c‐statistic. All anthropometric markers were associated with overall, colorectal and obesity‐related cancers. BMI, WC and HC were associated with PM breast cancer and no significant associations were seen for prostate cancer. Strongest associations were observed for WC across all outcomes, excluding PM breast cancer for which HC was strongest. WC had greater discrimination compared to BMI for overall and colorectal cancer in men and women with c‐statistics ranging from 0.70 to 0.71. We show all anthropometric measures are associated with the overall, colorectal, PM breast and obesity‐related cancer in men and women, but not prostate cancer. WC discriminated marginally better than BMI. However, all anthropometric measures were similarly moderately predictive of cancer risk. We do not recommend one anthropometric marker over another for assessing an individuals' risk of cancer.     

Clinical highlights from the National Cancer Data Base, 2000

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) is the empirical data collection and analysis arm of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer, and is supported in part by the American Cancer Society. The NCDB collects oncology patient demographic information, diagnostic and treatment information, and outcomes data from a broad spectrum of hospital-based cancer registries throughout the US, ranging from large research and teaching facilities to small community hospitals. Through this unique network, data are aggregated and reported back to participating hospitals to allow individual facilities to evaluate local patient care practices and outcomes. This article highlights the principal findings of articles published in 1999 and early 2000 that used NCDB data as the empirical basis of their analyses. Included among these are articles on breast cancer, gastric carcinoma, head and neck cancers, leukemia, liver carcinoma, lung cancer, parathyroid tumors, prostate carcinoma, small bowel adenocarcinoma, testicular malignancies, and vulvar melanoma. These articles are based on cases diagnosed between 1985 and 1996. The NCDB has accrued more than 6.4 million cancer cases for this time period. Sufficient numbers of rare cancers are reported to the NCDB to permit some types of clinical evaluation not possible using other data sources.     

Breast cancer risk in relation to serum cholesterol, serum beta-lipoprotein, height, weight, and blood pressure

The relation between breast cancer risk and serum levels of cholesterol and beta-lipoprotein (BLP), height, weight, Quetelet's index and blood pressure was studied in a cohort of 46,570 Swedish women less than 75 years of age. The cohort was examined between 1963 and 1965 and followed up in the Swedish Cancer Registry until 1983. During this period 1,182 cases of breast cancer were reported. Of those, 196 were reported among women less than 50 years of age. Statistically significant positive associations were observed between height, weight, and systolic blood pressure and breast cancer risk. No clear trend in cancer risk related to serum cholesterol or BLP was seen in the total material. In a stepwise Cox multiple regression analysis only the associations with height and blood pressure remained significant. Among women, having their cancer diagnosed before the age of 50, higher Quetelet's index was associated with a lower cancer risk, whereas a positive correlation was seen among women greater than or equal to 50 years. In the group of younger women a high BLP level was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. This relation became even stronger when studied in a multivariate analysis, which also showed a negative correlation between serum cholesterol and cancer risk.     

Fruits,Vegetables and the Risk of Cancer: a Multisite Case-Control Study in Uruguay

Introduction: Previous studies have suggested that high intake of fruit and vegetables may decrease the riskof a wide range of cancers, but this evidence has been challenged by the results of recent studies. Methods: Tofurther explore the association between fruit and vegetable intake and cancer risk we conducted a case-controlstudy of 11 cancer sites in Uruguay between 1996 and 2004, including 3,539 cancer cases and 2,032 hospitalcontrols. We used unconditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)of cancer associations. Results: In the multivariable model higher intake of fruits and vegetables combined wasassociated with a decreased risk of cancers of the esophagus (odds ratio, OR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.42-0.97), lung(OR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.57-0.98), breast (OR=0.47, 95% CI: 0.31-0.71), prostate (OR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.92)and all sites combined (OR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.87). When evaluated separately, fruit intake was more stronglyassociated with decreased cancer risk than vegetables. These inverse associations were mainly observed in men,among persons with high intake of meat, alcohol drinkers and among smokers. Conclusion: Our results providesome evidence that high intake of fruits and vegetables and particularly fruit may decrease the risk of cancer.However, because of the possibility that these findings could be due to residual confounding from intake ofmeat, alcohol drinking and tobacco smoking, further studies in populations with a large number of participantswith low or no exposure to these potential confounding factors are warranted.     

Legume intake and the risk of cancer: a multisite case–control study in Uruguay

Background

Previous studies have suggested that a high intake of legumes may decrease the risk of stomach and prostate cancer and some other cancers. However, the evidence is still limited. To further explore the association between legume intake and cancer risk we conducted a case–control study of 11 cancer sites in Uruguay between 1996 and 2004, including 3,539 cancer cases and 2,032 hospital controls.

Results

The highest versus the lowest tertile of legume intake was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx (OR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.34–0.68), esophagus (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.38–0.77), larynx (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.40–0.77), upper aerodigestive tract (OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.40–0.63), stomach (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49–0.97), colorectum (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.32–0.59), kidney (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24–0.71), and all sites combined (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.59–0.78). No significant association was observed between legume intake and cancers of the lung (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.83–1.27), breast (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.65–1.20), prostate (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.64–1.18) or bladder (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.57–1.17). Similar results were found for both beans and lentils.

Conclusion

Higher intake of legumes was associated with a decreased risk of several cancers including those of the upper aerodigestive tract, stomach, colorectum, and kidney, but not lung, breast, prostate or bladder. Further investigations of these associations in prospective cohort studies are warranted.     

Risk of cancer at sites other than the breast in Swedish families eligible for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation testing.

BACKGROUND: Population-based data on the risk of cancer in families eligible for BRCA1/2 mutation testing may help to reach a consensus about the association of BRCA1/2 mutations with cancer at sites other than the breast and may reveal new, non-BRCA1/2 related components of the familial clustering of cancer in those families. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The families of the Swedish Family-Cancer Database with at least three generations (n = 944,723) were classified according to the criteria proposed by the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. The cancer incidences in the classified families were compared with the incidences in the general population. The percentages of individuals with cancer in families eligible for BRCA1/2 mutation testing were compared with data in the literature to estimate the proportion of malignancies related to BRCA1/2 mutations. RESULTS: Families with two breast cancers before the age of 50 years showed increased risk of early onset pancreatic, prostate and ovarian cancers; families with ovarian and breast cancers presented increased incidences for ovarian and ocular cancers; families with two breast cancers, at least one of them under the age of 50 years, showed increased risks of prostate and primary liver cancers. Stomach cancer before age 70 years was twice as frequent in families with breast and ovarian cancers as in the general population. BRCA1/2 mutations probably explain most of the aggregation of ovarian cancer in families with male breast cancer, and in families with at least two breast cancers diagnosed before age 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: The association of BRCA1/2 mutations with ovarian, pancreatic, prostate and stomach cancers was confirmed at a population level. However, the clustering of early pancreatic cancer in families with two breast cancers under age 50 years, the aggregation of ovarian cancer in families with breast and ovarian cancers, and the increased incidence of early onset prostate cancer in families with male breast cancer seem to be due to other effects unrelated to BRCA1/2 mutations.