Combined EGFR/MET or EGFR/HSP90 inhibition is effective in the treatment of lung cancers codriven by mutant EGFR containing T790M and MET

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) that target the EGF receptor (EGFR) are effective in most non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients whose tumors harbor activating EGFR kinase domain mutations. Unfortunately, acquired resistance eventually emerges in these chronically treated cancers. Two of the most common mechanisms of acquired resistance to TKIs seen clinically are the acquisition of a secondary "gatekeeper" T790M EGFR mutation that increases the affinity of mutant EGFR for ATP and activation of MET to offset the loss of EGFR signaling. Although up to one-third of patient tumors resistant to reversible EGFR TKIs harbor concurrent T790M mutation and MET amplification, potential therapies for these tumors have not been modeled in vivo. In this study, we developed a preclinical platform to evaluate potential therapies by generating transgenic mouse lung cancer models expressing EGFR-mutant Del19-T790M or L858R-T790M, each with concurrent MET overexpression. We found that monotherapy targeting EGFR or MET alone did not produce significant tumor regression. In contrast, combination therapies targeting EGFR and MET simultaneously were highly efficacious against EGFR TKI-resistant tumors codriven by Del19-T790M or L858R-T790M and MET. Our findings therefore provide an in vivo model of intrinsic resistance to reversible TKIs and offer preclinical proof-of-principle that combination targeting of EGFR and MET may benefit patients with NSCLC.     

Acquired Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancers Dependent on the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Pathway

Most advanced Non–Small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (exon 19 deletions or L858R) initially respond to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib. However, over time (median of 6–12 months), most tumors develop acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs. Intense research in these NSCLCs has identified two major mechanisms of resistance to gefitinib/erlotinib: secondary resistance mutations and “oncogene kinase switch" systems. The secondary T790M mutation occurs in 50% of EGFR-mutated patients with TKI resistance, and in vitro, this mutation negates the hypersensitivity of activating EGFR mutations. Sensitive detection methods have identified a proportion of TKI-naive tumors that carry T790M, and these resistant clones may be selected after exposure to gefitinib or erlotinib. Other secondary resistance mutations (D761Y, L747S, T854A) seem to be rare. The amplification of the MET oncogene is present in 20% of TKI-resistant tumors; however, in half of the cases with this “oncogene kinase switch" mechanism the T790M is coexistent. It is possible that other kinases (such as insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor [IGF-1R]) might also be selected to bypass EGFR pathways in resistant tumors. The growing preclinical data in EGFR-mutated NSCLCs with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib has spawned the initiation or conception of clinical trials testing novel EGFR inhibitors that in vitro inhibit T790M (neratinib, XL647, BIBW 2992, and PF-00299804), MET, or IGF-1R inhibitors in combination with EGFR TKIs, and heat shock protein 90 inhibitors. Ongoing preclinical and clinical research in EGFR-mutated NSCLC has the potential to significantly improve the outcomes of patients with these somatic mutations.     

Enhanced anti‐angiogenic effect of E7820 in combination with erlotinib in epidermal growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor‐resistant non‐small‐cell lung cancer xenograft models

Most non‐small‐cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) harboring activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are initially responsive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs); however, they invariably develop resistance to these drugs. E7820 is an angiogenesis inhibitor that decreases integrin‐α2 expression and is currently undergoing clinical trials. We investigated whether E7820 in combination with erlotinib, an EGFR‐TKI, could overcome EGFR‐TKI‐resistance in the NSCLC cell lines A549 (KRAS; G12S), H1975 (EGFR; L858R/T790M), and H1650 (PTEN; loss, EGFR; exon 19 deletion), which are resistant to erlotinib. Immunohistochemical analysis was carried out in xenografted tumors to investigate anti‐angiogenesis activity and endothelial cell apoptosis levels by endothelial cell marker CD31 and TUNEL staining, respectively. Treatment with E7820 (50 mg/kg) with erlotinib (60 mg/kg) showed a synergistic antitumor effect in three xenograft models. Immunohistochemical analysis indicated that combined treatment with E7820 and erlotinib significantly decreased microvessel density and increased apoptosis of tumor‐associated endothelial cells compared with use of only one of the agents. This combination increased apoptosis in HUVECs through activation of both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways in vitro. The combination of E7820 with erlotinib is an alternative strategy to overcome erlotinib resistance in NSCLC by enhancement of the anti‐angiogenic activity of E7820.     

Audit of Molecular Mechanisms of Primary and Secondary Resistance to Various Generations of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Known Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in a Tertiary Centre

AimsPresently, three generations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are approved against oncogene addicted EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with actionable EGFR mutations invariably develop resistance. This resistance can be intrinsic (primary) or acquired (secondary).Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective study carried out between January 2016 and April 2021 analysing 486 samples of NSCLC for primary and secondary resistance to first- (erlotinib, gefitinb), second- (afatinib) and/or third-generation (osimertinib) TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLCs by next generation sequencing (NGS). Tissue NGS was carried out using the Thermofischer Ion Torrent? Oncomine? Focus 52 gene assay; liquid biopsy NGS was carried out using the Oncomine Lung Cell-Free Total Nucleic Acid assay. All cases were previously tested for a single EGFR gene with the Therascreen® EGFR RGQ PCR kit.ResultsThe results were divided into four groups: (i) group 1: primary resistance to first- and/or second-generation TKIs. This group, with 21 cases, showed EGFR exon 20 insertions, dual, complex mutations and variant of unknown significance, de novo MET gene amplification besides other mutations. (ii) Group 2: primary resistance to third-generation TKIs. This group showed two cases, with one showing dual EGFR mutation (L858R and E709A) and EGFR gene amplification. (iii) Group 3: secondary resistance to first- and second-generation TKIs. This group had 27 cases, which were previously reported negative for EGFR T790M by single gene testing. Significant findings were MET gene amplification in four cases, with one also showing MET exon 14 skipping mutation. Three cases showed small cell change and one showed loss of primary mutation. (iv) Group 4: secondary resistance to third-generation TKIs. The latter group was further subgrouped into group 4A: secondary resistance to osimertinib (third-generation TKI) when offered as second-line therapy after first- and second-generation TKIs on detection of T790M mutation. This group had 15 cases. EGFR T790M mutation was lost in 10 (10/15; 67%) cases and was retained in five cases. Patients with T790M loss experienced early resistance (6.9 months versus 12.6 months mean, P = 0.0024) compared with cases that retained T790M. Two cases gained MET amplification as the resistance mechanisms. Other mutations that were found when EGFR T790M was lost were in FGFR3, KRAS, PIK3CA, CTNNB1, BRAF genes. One case had EML4-ALK translocation. Two cases showed driver EGFR deletion 19, retained T790M and C797S mutation in Cis form. Group 4B: secondary resistance to osimertinib (when given as first-line therapy) in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. This group had three cases. The duration of osimertinib treatment ranged from 11 to 17 months. Two patients showed additional C797S mutation along with primary EGFR mutation.ConclusionThis study shows the wide spectrum of primary and secondary EGFR resistance mechanisms to first, second and third generation of TKIs and helps us to identify newer therapeutic targets that could carry forward the initial advantage offered by EGFR TKIs.     

Non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations in the EGFR kinase domain

Key “driver” mutations have been discovered in specific subgroups of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Activating mutations in the form of deletions in exon 19 (del 19) or the missense mutation L858R in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) predict outcome to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as gefitinib and erlotinib. Pooled data from several phase II studies show that gefitinib and erlotinib induce responses in over 70% of NSCLC patients harbouring EGFR mutations, with progression-free survival (PFS) ranging from 9 to 13 months and median survival of around 23 months. Two studies in Caucasian and Asian patients have confirmed that these subgroups of patients attain response rates of 70% with erlotinib and gefitinib, including complete responses, PFS up to 14 months and median survival up to 27 months. These landmark outcomes have been accompanied by new challenges: the additional role of chemotherapy and the management of tumours with the secondary T790M mutation that confers resistance to EGFR TKIs. Mechanisms of resistance to reversible EGFR TKIs should be further clarified and could be related to modifications in DNA repair. The presence of double mutations (T790M plus either L858R or del 19) at the time of diagnosis could be much more frequent than originally thought. The sensitivity to EGFR TKIs could be greatly influenced by the expression of genes involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining.     

Dual MET�CEGFR combinatorial inhibition against T790M-EGFR-mediated erlotinib-resistant lung cancer

Despite clinical approval of erlotinib, most advanced lung cancer patients are primary non-responders. Initial responders invariably develop secondary resistance, which can be accounted for by T790M-EGFR mutation in half of the relapses. We show that MET is highly expressed in lung cancer, often concomitantly with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), including H1975 cell line. The erlotinib-resistant lung cancer cell line H1975, which expresses L858R/T790M-EGFR in-cis, was used to test for the effect of MET inhibition using the small molecule inhibitor SU11274. H1975 cells express wild-type MET, without genomic amplification (CNV=1.1). At 2 μM, SU11274 had significant in vitro pro-apoptotic effect in H1975 cells, 3.9-fold (P=0.0015) higher than erlotinib, but had no effect on the MET and EGFR-negative H520 cells. In vivo, SU11274 also induced significant tumour cytoreduction in H1975 murine xenografts in our bioluminescence molecular imaging assay. Using small-animal microPET/MRI, SU11274 treatment was found to induce an early tumour metabolic response in H1975 tumour xenografts. MET and EGFR pathways were found to exhibit collaborative signalling with receptor cross-activation, which had different patterns between wild type (A549) and L858R/T790M-EGFR (H1975). SU11274 plus erlotinib/CL-387,785 potentiated MET inhibition of downstream cell proliferative survival signalling. Knockdown studies in H1975 cells using siRNA against MET alone, EGFR alone, or both, confirmed the enhanced downstream inhibition with dual MET–EGFR signal path inhibition. Finally, in our time-lapse video-microscopy and in vivo multimodal molecular imaging studies, dual SU11274-erlotinib concurrent treatment effectively inhibited H1975 cells with enhanced abrogation of cytoskeletal functions and complete regression of the xenograft growth. Together, our results suggest that MET-based targeted inhibition using small-molecule MET inhibitor can be a potential treatment strategy for T790M-EGFR-mediated erlotinib-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer. Furthermore, optimised inhibition may be further achieved with MET inhibition in combination with erlotinib or an irreversible EGFR-TKI.     

Challenges of detecting EGFR T790M in gefitinib/erlotinib-resistant tumours

For patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the introduction of the epi- dermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), gefitinib and erlotinib, into clinical practice was promising. Treatment with either of these agents is associated with an objective response in 10-20% of patients. Subsequent studies have shown that patients responsive to gefitinib/erlotinib have tumours containing somatic activating mutations in the EGFR gene. Although impressive clinical and radiological responses have been observed in these patients, tumour progression occurs after the prolonged administration of gefitinib/erlotinib as acquired resistance develops. In order to combat acquired resistance, research has been largely focused on determining the factors underlying it. Two resistance mechanisms have so far been identified: a secondary mutation in the EGFR gene, T790M, and amplification of the MET proto-oncogene. This review will centre on T790M, which is thought to cause steric hindrance and impair the binding of gefitinib/erlotinib. A novel class of irreversible TKIs currently under development may retain activity against some common resistance mechanisms, including T790M. The next challenge is to identify accurately the subgroup of patients with NSCLC whose tumours harbour EGFR T790M. To this end, post-treatment tumour specimens will be needed to establish molecular profiles for each patient. In addition, novel, highly sensitive technology will be required to detect these mutations. This is because allelic dilution, whereby the EGFR gene is amplified but only a few copies of the T790M allele are needed to confer resistance, may obscure results of conventional sequencing methods. The importance of identifying patients who harbour T790M cannot be overstated; the development of irreversible TKIs will have profound implications for their treatment. In this way, treatment strategies in NSCLC are becoming increasingly tailored to the individual, and may set an example for other areas of oncology.     

MET gene amplification or EGFR mutation activate MET in lung cancers untreated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

We analyzed MET protein and copy number in NSCLC with or without EGFR mutations untreated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). MET copy number was examined in 28 NSCLC and 4 human bronchial epithelial cell lines (HBEC) and 100 primary tumors using quantitative real‐time PCR. Positive results were confirmed by array comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in‐situ hybridization. Total and phospho‐MET protein expression was determined in 24 NSCLC and 2 HBEC cell lines using Western blot. EGFR mutations were examined for exon 19 deletions, T790M, and L858R. Knockdown of EGFR with siRNA was performed to examine the relation between EGFR and MET activation. High‐level MET amplification was observed in 3 of 28 NSCLC cell lines and in 2 of 100 primary lung tumors that had not been treated with EGFR‐TKIs. MET protein was highly expressed and phosphorylated in all the 3 cell lines with high MET amplification. In contrast, 6 NSCLC cell lines showed phospho‐MET among 21 NSCLC cell lines without MET amplification (p = 0.042). Furthermore, those 6 cell lines harboring phospho‐MET expression without MET amplification were all EGFR mutant (p = 0.0039). siRNA‐mediated knockdown of EGFR abolished phospho‐MET expression in examined 3 EGFR mutant cell lines of which MET gene copy number was not amplified. By contrast, phospho‐MET expression in 2 cell lines with amplified MET gene was not down‐regulated by knockdown of EGFR. Our results indicated that MET amplification was present in untreated NSCLC and EGFR mutation or MET amplification activated MET protein in NSCLC. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Double mutation and gene copy number of EGFR in gefitinib refractory non-small-cell lung cancer

Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene have been reported in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially in patients with adenocarcinoma and never smokers. Some common somatic mutations in EGFR, including deletion mutations in exon 19 and leucine-to-arginine substitution at amino acid position 858 (L858R) in exon 21, have been examined for their ability to predict sensitivity to gefitinib or erlotinib, which are selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). On the other hand, reports have shown that the threonine-to-methionine substitution at amino acid position 790 (T790M) in exon 20 is related to gefitinib resistance. Some studies have indicated that high copy numbers of the EGFR gene may be a more effective molecular predictor to responsiveness and prolonged survival in patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. Here, we describe two NSCLC patients with the L858R mutation who did not respond to gefitinib. Case 1 harbored both the T790M and L858R mutations, and fluorescence in situ hybridization showed EGFR gene amplification. Case 2 harbored both the L858R and aspartic acid-to-tyrosine substitution at amino acid position 761 in exon 19 of EGFR mutations and had a high polysomy status for EGFR. In these two cases, tumors showed resistance to gefitinib treatment despite the presence of EGFR L858R mutation and increased copy number. Our findings encourage further molecular analysis to elucidate the relationship between the EGFR status, including mutations and amplifications, and the responsiveness of NSCLC to gefitinib.     

Impact of EGFR mutation analysis in non-small cell lung cancer

The discovery of mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accelerated the research of molecular-targeted therapy by EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as gefitinib and erlotinib. About 90% of EGFR mutations are clustered in exons 19 (deletion) and 21 (point mutation at codon 858) and patients with these mutations have great response to EGFR-TKIs. However, tumors that initially respond to EGFR-TKIs almost inevitably become resistant later and T790M secondary mutation in the EGFR gene and MET amplification are reported to account for the mechanism of this acquired resistance. In this review, we summarize the recent findings about EGFR mutations, amplification, alterations of other related genes and sensitivity and acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. We also discuss from our studies the relationship between EGFR mutations and other molecular alterations such as aberrant methylation in tumor suppressor genes (TSGs), which indicates that they are related to the mechanism of the pathogenesis of lung cancer. The accumulated important data confer further insights on translational research, providing us with the new strategies for the treatment of NSCLCs.     

Acquisition of cancer stem cell‐like properties in non‐small cell lung cancer with acquired resistance to afatinib

Afatinib is an irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is known to be effective against the EGFR T790M variant, which accounts for half of the mechanisms of acquired resistance to reversible EGFR‐TKIs. However, acquired resistance to afatinib was also observed in clinical use. Thus, elucidating and overcoming the mechanisms of resistance are important issues in the treatment of non‐small cell lung cancer. In this study, we established various afatinib‐resistant cell lines and investigated the resistance mechanisms. EGFR T790M mutations were not detected using direct sequencing in established resistant cells. Several afatinib‐resistant cell lines displayed MET amplification, and these cells were sensitive to the combination of afatinib plus crizotinib. As a further investigation, a cell line that acquired resistance to afatinib plus crizotinib, HCC827‐ACR, was established from one of the MET amplified‐cell lines. Several afatinib‐resistant cell lines including HCC827‐ACR displayed epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) features and epigenetic silencing of miR‐200c, which is a suppresser of EMT. In addition, these cell lines also exhibited overexpression of ALDH1A1 and ABCB1, which are putative stem cell markers, and resistance to docetaxel. In conclusion, we established afatinib‐resistant cells and found that MET amplification, EMT, and stem cell‐like features are observed in cells with acquired resistance to EGFR‐TKIs. This finding may provide clues to overcoming resistance to EGFR‐TKIs.     

Comprehensive Analysis of EGFR-Mutant Abundance and Its Effect on Efficacy of EGFR TKIs in Advanced NSCLC with EGFR Mutations

IntroductionA qualitative detection method for EGFR mutations is not sufficient to guide precise targeted therapy in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the abundance of EGFR mutations and efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).MethodsWe used the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) method optimized with competitive blockers and specific mutation quantitation (ARMS+) to quantitatively evaluate the abundance of EGFR mutations in 201 patients with advanced NSCLC. A cutoff value of the abundance of EGFR mutations was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis in a training group and validated in a validation group.ResultsThe abundance of EGFR activating mutation by ARMS+ was significantly associated with objective response to EGFR TKIs. The abundance of 19DEL was significantly higher than that of L858R, with cutoff values for 19DEL and L858R of 4.9% and 9.5%, respectively. The median progression-free survival in the high group was significantly longer than that in the low group (19DEL, 15.0 versus 2.0 months [p < 0.001] and L858R, 12.3 versus 2.0 months [p < 0.001]) in the training set. Similar results were also observed in the validation set. Nine of 13 patients harboring T790M mutation achieved a partial response to EGFR TKIs. Most (seven of nine) were identified to have a low abundance of T790M mutation. The abundance of EGFR mutations appeared to be more significantly associated with the copy number of EGFR mutations from circulating tumor DNA in 19DEL group.ConclusionThe abundance of EGFR activating mutation by ARMS+ was significantly associated with objective response to EGFR TKIs. The abundance of EGFR^T790M mutation may have an adverse impact on progression-free survival rather than on objective response rate in patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with EGFR TKIs.     

Indication of EGFR kinase inhibitors should be refined

Even though lung cancer incidence began to decline in the majority of industrialized countries, is still belong to cancers with one of the highest incidence and mortality rates. In the Czech Republic, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase activity inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib are approved for the use as the second- and third-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. In a cohort of non-small-cell lung cancer patients, erlotinib administration led to tumour regression in less than 20% of patients. However, when used in patients with EGFR-activating mutations, e.g. L858R or delE746-A750, the response rate increased to 75-82% in several parallel clinical studies. Similarly, improved response rate was reported in patients bearing amplified wild-type EGFR gene. In contrary, patients with T790M, D761Y, L747S, and T854A mutations (and some other rare abberations) were found to be resistant to treatment with small-molecule inhibitors targeting the active site of the kinase domain. These mutations do not change the EGFR affinity to gefitinib or erlotinib but the mutated receptor is able to bind ATP into its active site even in the presence of erlotinib or gefitinib, similar to a wild-type receptor without an inhibitor. Besides that, when the EGFR molecule bears both the activating (e.g. L858R) and resistance-inducing mutation (e.g. T790M), the tumour acquires resistance to both erlotinib and gefitinib treatment. Currently, research focuses on a development of new strategies that would allow treatment of patients bearing mutations inducing resistance to the small-molecule inhibitors targeted on the active site of EGFR kinase domain. Contrary to the current guidelines for Czech oncologists, identification of EGFR with any of the above mentioned resistance-inducing somatic mutations should be considered as an explicit contraindication for non-small-cell cancer treatment using small-molecule EGFR kinase activity inhibitors erlotinib or gefitinib. This should also include patients in whom a resistance-inducing mutation is detected together with any of the activating mutations or deletions.     

Poor response to erlotinib in patients with tumors containing baseline EGFR T790M mutations found by routine clinical molecular testing

BackgroundEGFR T790M is the most common mutation associated with acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Baseline EGFR T790M mutations in EGFR TKI-naïve patients have been reported, but the frequency and their association with response to EGFR TKIs remain unclear.Patients and methodsThe frequency of baseline EGFR T790M as detected by routine molecular genotyping was determined by reviewing clinical results obtained at our institution from 2009 to 2013. We also collected outcome data for treatment with EGFR TKIs.ResultsTo define the incidence of EGFR T790M, we reviewed 2774 sequentially tested patients with lung cancer who underwent molecular testing using a mass spectrometry-based assay, and 11 (0.5%) had baseline EGFR T790M. Compiling results from several molecular techniques, we observed EGFR T790M in tumors from 20 patients who had not previously been treated with an EGFR TKI. In all cases, EGFR T790M occurred concurrently with another EGFR mutation, L858R (80%, 16/20), or exon 19 deletion (20%, 4/20). Two percent of all pre-treatment EGFR-mutant lung cancers harbored an EGFR T790M mutation. Thirteen patients received erlotinib monotherapy as treatment for metastatic disease. The response rate was 8% (1/13, 95% confidence interval 0%–35%). For the patients who received erlotinib, the median progression-free survival was 2 months and the median overall survival was 16 months.ConclusionsDe novo EGFR T790M mutations are rare (<1%) when identified by standard sensitivity methods. TKI therapy for patients with baseline EGFR T790M detected by standard molecular analysis has limited benefit.     

Oncogene swap as a novel mechanism of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor in lung cancer

Mutant selective epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs), such as rociletinib and AZD9291, are effective for tumors with T790M secondary mutation that become refractory to first‐generation EGFR‐TKI. However, acquired resistance to these prospective drugs is anticipated considering the high adaptability of cancer cells and the mechanisms remain largely obscure. Here, CNX‐2006 (tool compound of rociletinib) resistant sublines were established by chronic exposure of HCC827EPR cells harboring exon 19 deletion and T790M to CNX‐2006. Through the analyses of these resistant subclones, we identified two resistant mechanisms accompanied by MET amplification. One was bypass signaling by MET amplification in addition to T790M, which was inhibited by the combination of CNX‐2006 and MET‐TKI. Another was loss of amplified EGFR mutant allele including T790M while acquiring MET amplification. Interestingly, MET‐TKI alone was able to overcome this resistance, suggesting that oncogenic dependence completely shifted from EGFR to MET. We propose describing this phenomenon as an “oncogene swap.” Furthermore, we analyzed multiple lesions from a patient who died of acquired resistance to gefitinib, then found a clinical example of an oncogene swap in which the EGFR mutation was lost and a MET gene copy was gained. In conclusion, an “oncogene swap” from EGFR to MET is a novel resistant mechanism to the EGFR‐TKI. This novel mechanism should be considered in order to avoid futile inhibition of the original oncogene.     

Clinical outcomes of EGFR-TKI treatment and genetic heterogeneity in lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations on exons 19 and 21

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, including a known exon 19 deletion (19 del) and exon 21 L858R point mutation (L858R mutation), are strong predictors of the response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibi?tor (EGFR?TKI) treatment in lung adenocarcinoma. However, whether patients carrying EGFR 19 del and L858R muta?tions exhibit different responsiveness to EGFR?TKIs and what are the potential mechanism for this difference remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of EGFR?TKI treatment in patients with EGFR 19 del and L858R mutations and explore the genetic heterogeneity of tumors with the two mutation subtypes. Methods: Of 1127 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR 19 del or L858R mutations, 532 received EGFR?TKI treatment and were included in this study. EGFR 19 del and L858R mutations were detected by using denaturing high?performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC). T790M mutation, which is a common resistant mutation on exon 20 of EGFR, was detected by amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). Next?generation sequencing (NGS) was used to explore the genetic heterogeneity of tumors with EGFR 19 del and L858R mutations. Results: Of the 532 patients, 319 (60.0%) had EGFR 19 del, and 213 (40.0%) had L858R mutations. The patients with EGFR 19 del presented a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) for EGFR?TKI treatment (55.2% vs. 43.7%, P = 0.017) and had a longer progression?free survival (PFS) after first?line EGFR?TKI treatment (14.4 vs. 11.4 months,P= 0.034) compared with those with L858R mutations. However, no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between the two groups of patients. T790M mutation status was analyzed in 88 patients before EGFR?TKI treatment and 134 after EGFR?TKI treatment, and there was no significant difference in the co?exist?ence of T790M mutation with EGFR 19 del and L858R mutations before EGFR?TKI treatment (5.6% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.554)or after treatment (24.4% vs. 35.4%, P= 0.176). In addition, 24 patients with EGFR 19 del and 19 with L858R mutations were analyzed by NGS, and no significant difference in the presence of multiple somatic mutations was observed between the two genotypes. Conclusions: Patients with EGFR 19 del exhibit longer PFS and higher ORR compared with those with L858R muta?tions. Whether the heterogeneity of tumors with EGFR 19 del and L858R mutations contribute to a therapeutic response difference needs further investigation.     

Responses to crizotinib can occur in c-MET overexpressing nonsmall cell lung cancer after developing EGFR-TKI resistance

Evidence suggests that activation of the MET signaling pathway might be associated with EGFR-TKI resistance. EGFR TKI-resistant lung cancers often remain sensitive to inhibition of the EGFR pathway; thus, c-MET inhibitors are likely to be effective when combined with continued EGFR-TKI treatment. Here, we described a 56-year-old male who became refractory after first-line gefitinib therapy and was confirmed to have c-MET overexpression without a T790M mutation, c-MET amplification or MET exon 14 alterations. A complete response to crizotinib occurred in this patient. Our case report uncovered the underlying mechanism of c-MET overexpression in affecting EGFR-TKI sensitivity, and crizotinib may assist in overcoming this problem.     

Searching for a magic bullet in NSCLC: the role of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and tyrosine kinase inhibitors

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been implicated in the pathophysiology of various cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Inhibitors targeting the tyrosine kinase domain of this receptor have been seen to elicit favourable responses in a subset of NSCLC patients. Mutational analysis of the EGFR has revealed that the response to reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is a result of the presence of activating mutations present between exons 18 and 21, most frequently the exon 19 deletion and the L858R mutations. After a prolonged treatment with reversible TKIs, patients have been seen to develop resistance that results, in part, from the presence of the secondary T790M mutation in exon 20. Preclinical data suggest that second-generation TKIs may be able to overcome T790M resistance by virtue of their irreversible mode of binding. In addition to the predominant mutations in the EGFR gene, alternative genetic changes between exons 18 and 21 have been observed. Experimental models have demonstrated that TKIs exhibit differential efficacy depending on which mutations are present. Such information may result in the design of highly specific agents that target specific mutations, which could result in more efficacious treatments.     

Good Clinical Response to Erlotinib in a Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient Harboring Multiple Brain Metastases and a Double Active Somatic Epidermal Growth Factor Gene Mutation

Recently, 2 small molecule kinase inhibitors (TKIs), targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), have proven effective in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. However, it is unknown whether the EGFR double activating mutation of L858R in exon 21 and the in-frame deletion in exon 19 is a predictor of the effectiveness of EGFR-TKIs. We report for the first time a case of non-small cell lung cancer with central nervous system metastases harboring a rare EGFR double activating mutation who showed a good clinical response to erlotinib, regardless of his poor performance status, as swallowing is not possible. Therefore, we suggest that erlotinib may become a therapeutic choice in cases of central nervous system metastases even with poor performance status.Key Words: Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, Erlotinib, Squamous cell lung cancer, Pharmacokinetics, Pleural effusion     

The safety and efficacy of osimertinib for the treatment of EGFR T790M mutation positive non-small-cell lung cancer

First- and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the evidence-based first-line treatment for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) that harbor sensitizing EGFR mutations (i.e. exon 19 deletions or L858R). However, acquired resistance to EGFR TKI monotherapy occurs invariably within a median time frame of one year. The most common form of biological resistance is through the selection of tumor clones harboring the EGFR T790M mutation, present in >50% of repeat biopsies. The presence of the EGFR T790M mutation negates the inhibitory activity of gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib. A novel class of third-generation EGFR TKIs has been identified by probing a series of covalent pyrimidine EGFR inhibitors that bind to amino-acid residue C797 of EGFR and preferentially inhibit mutant forms of EGFR versus the wild-type receptor. We review the rapid clinical development and approval of the third-generation EGFR TKI osimertinib for treatment of NSCLCs with EGFR-T790M.