MLL/KMT2A translocations in diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas

Translocations of the histone‐lysine N‐methyltransferase 2A (KMT2A) gene, formerly known as myeloid lymphoid leukemia/mixed‐lineage leukemia gene, are commonly associated with high‐risk de novo or therapy‐associated B‐cell and T‐cell lymphoblastic leukemias and myeloid neoplasms. Rare B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphomas harboring KMT2A translocations have been reported, but information regarding the clinical behavior of such cases is limited. Here, we describe two extranodal diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas (DLBCLs): a primary thyroid DLBCL and a large cell transformation of a splenic marginal zone lymphoma, which displayed complex karyotypes and translocations involving chromosome 11q23 targeting the KMT2A gene. The pathological and clinical characteristics of these cases are discussed in the context of previously reported lymphomas associated with different types of KMT2A genetic aberrations. In contrast to the poor clinical outcomes of patients with acute leukemias and myeloid neoplasms associated with KMT2A translocations, patients with B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphomas, exhibiting similar translocations, appear to respond well to immunochemotherapy. Our findings add to the growing list of histone methyltransferase genes deregulated in DLBCL and highlight the diversity of mechanisms, altering the function of epigenetic modifier genes in lymphomas.     

Array comparative genomic hybridization identifies genetic regions associated with outcome in aggressive diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas

BACKGROUND:

Diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) are the most common type of non‐Hodgkin lymphomas. With chemotherapy and progenitor stem cell transplantation, about 60% of patients with DLBCL are long‐term survivors. The International Prognostic Index identifies patients with different outcomes. However, biologic characteristics also may help to discriminate different treatments groups.

METHODS:

DNA copy number changes identified by array comparative genomic hybridization (array‐CGH) were studied in 40 patients who had DLBCL with a poor prognosis and who were treated uniformly with dose‐escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) and intensification before high‐dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS:

In total, 722 copy number changes were observed (median, 5 copy number changes per patient; range, 0‐75 copy number changes per patient), with a predominance of gains. Gains on 2p16 were present only in patients who failed to achieve a complete response after escalated CHOP therapy (P < .05). In univariate analysis, gains on 2p16 and losses on 17p13 (the tumor protein p53 gene TP53 gene) were associated with a poor response to the therapy. Furthermore, age >60 years and losses on 10q23.31 (the phosphatase and tensin homolog gene PTEN) or on 17p13 were associated with short survival. In multivariate analysis, only advanced age and losses on 10q23.31 retained an adverse prognostic impact.

CONCLUSIONS:

Array‐CGH identified multiple regions with common copy number changes, some of which were associated with outcome in patients with DLBCL. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Burkitt lymphoma versus diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: a practical approach

Burkitt Lymphoma (BL) is listed in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lymphoid tumours as an “aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma”, characterized by a high degree of proliferation of the malignant cells and deregulation of the c‐MYC gene. The main diagnostic challenge in BL is to distinguish it from diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). While in children BL and DLBCL types probably do not differ clinically, and the differential diagnosis between BL and DLBCL may theoretically appear clear‐cut, in adults daily practice shows the existence of cases that have morphological features, immunophenotypic and cytogenetics intermediate between DLBCL and BL, and cannot be classified with certainty in these categories. Distinguishing between BL and DLBCL is critical, as the two diseases require different management. This review summarizes the current practical approach, including the use of a large panel of antibodies, and cytogenetic and molecular diagnostic techniques, to distinguish between BL, DLBCL and the provisional category of “B‐cell lymphoma, unclassificable, with features intermediate between diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma”, now listed in the updated WHO classification. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Burkitt lymphoma versus diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: a practical approach

Burkitt Lymphoma (BL) is listed in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lymphoid tumours as an ‘aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma’, characterized by a high degree of proliferation of the malignant cells and deregulation of the c‐MYC gene. The main diagnostic challenge in BL is to distinguish it from diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). While in children BL and DLBCL types probably do not differ clinically, and the differential diagnosis between BL and DLBCL may theoretically appear clear‐cut, in adults daily practice shows the existence of cases that have morphological features, immunophenotypic and cytogenetics intermediate between DLBCL and BL, and cannot be classified with certainty in these categories. Distinguishing between BL and DLBCL is critical, as the two diseases require different management. This review summarizes the current practical approach, including the use of a large panel of antibodies, and cytogenetic and molecular diagnostic techniques, to distinguish between BL, DLBCL and the provisional category of ‘B‐cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma’, now listed in the updated WHO classification. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma after first‐line immuno‐CT: Treatment options and outcomes

In the rituximab era, one‐third of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients experience relapse/refractory disease after first‐line anthracycline‐based immunochemotherapy. Optimal management remains an unmet medical need. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of a cohort of refractory patients according to their patterns of refractoriness and the type of salvage option. We performed a retrospective analysis, which included 104 diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients treated at Lyon Sud University Hospital (2002‐2017) who presented with refractory disease. Refractoriness was defined as progressive/stable disease during first‐line treatment (primary refractory, N = 47), a partial response after the end of first‐line treatment that required subsequent treatment (residual disease, N = 19), or relapse within 1 year of diagnosis after an initial complete response (CR) (early relapse, N = 38). The 2‐year overall survival (OS) rates for primary refractory, early relapse, and residual disease patients were 27%, 25%, and 52%, respectively, while the event‐free survival rates for those groups were 13%, 13%, and 42%, respectively. In a univariate analysis, lactate dehydrogenase level, Ann Arbor stage, poor performance status, high age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index score, and age > 65 years were associated with shorter OS. The use of rituximab and platinum‐based chemo during the first salvage treatment was associated with prolonged OS. In a multivariate analysis, age (HR:2.06) and rituximab use (HR:0.54) were associated with OS. Among patients <65 years who achieved a CR, autologous stem‐cell transplant was associated with higher 2‐year OS (90% vs 74%, P = 0.10). Patients who were treated with a targeted therapy in the context of a clinical trial after second‐line treatment had a higher 2‐year OS (34% vs 19%, P = 0.06). In conclusion, patients with primary refractory disease or early relapse have very poor outcomes but may benefit from rituximab retreatment during the first salvage treatment.     

Characterization of genomic imbalances in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma by detailed SNP‐chip analysis

The pathogenesis of diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas (DLBCL) is only partly understood. We analyzed 148 DLBCL by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)‐chips to characterize genomic imbalances. Seventy‐nine cases were of the germinal center B‐cell like (GCB) type of DLBCL, 49 of the activated B‐cell like (ABC) subtype and 20 were unclassified DLBCL. Twenty‐four regions of recurrent genomic gains and 38 regions of recurrent genomic losses were identified over the whole cohort, with a median of 25 imbalances per case for ABC‐DLBCL and 19 per case for GCB‐DLBCL. Several recurrent copy number changes showed differential frequencies in the GCB‐ and ABC‐DLBCL subgroups, including gains of HDAC7A predominantly in GCB‐DLBCL (38% of cases) and losses of BACH2 and CASP8AP2 predominantly in ABC‐DLBCL (35%), hinting at disparate pathogenetic mechanisms in these entities. Correlating gene expression and copy number revealed a strong gene dosage effect in all tumors, with 34% of probesets showing a concordant expression change in affected regions. Two new potential tumor suppressor genes emerging from the analysis, CASP3 and IL5RA, were sequenced in ten and 16 candidate cases, respectively. However, no mutations were found, pointing to a potential haploinsufficiency effect of these genes, considering their reduced expression in cases with deletions. Our study thus describes differences and similarities in the landscape of genomic aberrations in the DLBCL subgroups in a large collection of cases, confirming already known targets, but also discovering novel copy number changes with possible pathogenetic relevance.     

Primary diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma of the tonsil

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to evaluate the prognostic factors and treatment outcome of Indian patients with primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the tonsil treated at a single institution. METHODS: In all, 121 patients with DLBCL of the tonsil, treated at the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India, from January 1990 to December 2002, were included. The median age was 45 years and the majority of patients (68%) were males. Systemic symptoms were present in 12% of patients; 28% presented with stage I and 67% had stage II disease. Treatment consisted of a combination of chemotherapy (CTh) and radiotherapy (RT) for the majority of patients (69.4%). Among those receiving RT, 64% received an RT dose of > or =45 Gy. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 62 months, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 66.4% and 81.6%, respectively. Significant prognostic factors included: WHO performance score > or =2 (OS: 72.1% vs 95.6%, P = .016), bulky tumors (OS: 68.5% vs 86.9%, P = .001), presence of B-symptoms (OS: 36.7% vs 79.6%, P < .001), and Ann Arbor stage. On multivariate analysis; WHO performance score > or =2 (hazard ratio [HR], 4.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-15.12), and B symptoms (HR, 6.27; 95% CI, 2.38-16.48), retained statistical significance. CTh + RT resulted in a significantly better outcome than those treated with CTh alone (OS: 85.7% vs 70.7%, P = .008). The complete response (P = .053), DFS (P = .039), and OS (P = .014) rates were significantly better for patients receiving an RT dose > or =45 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor bulk, WHO performance score, the presence of B symptoms, and Ann Arbor stage significantly influence outcome. A combined modality treatment, consisting of CTh and RT (with an RT dose of > or =45 Gy), results in a satisfactory outcome in patients with this uncommon neoplasm.     

Array‐comparative genomic hybridization profiling of immunohistochemical subgroups of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma shows distinct genomic alterations

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) displays striking heterogeneity at the clinical, genetic and molecular levels. Subtypes include germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) DLBCL and activated B-cell-like (ABC) DLBCL, according to microarray analysis, and germinal center type or non-germinal center type by immunohistochemistry. Although some reports have described genomic aberrations based upon microarray classification system, genomic aberrations based upon immunohistochemical classifications have rarely been reported. The present study aimed to ascertain the relationship between genomic aberrations and subtypes identified by immunohistochemistry, and to study the pathogenetic character of Chinese DLBCL. We conducted immunohistochemistry using antibodies against CD10, BCL6 and MUM1 in 59 samples of DLBCL from Chinese patients, and then performed microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for each case. Characteristic genomic differences were found between GCB and non-GCB DLBCL from the array data. The GCB type was characterized by more gains at 7q (7q22.1, P < 0.05) and losses at 16q (P ≤ 0.05), while the non-GCB type was characterized by gains at 11q24.3 and 3q13.2 (P < 0.05). We found completely different mutations in BCL6+ and BCL6− non-GCB type DLBCL, whereby the BCL6− group had a higher number of gains at 1q and a loss at 14q32.13 (P ≤ 0.005), while the BCL6+ group showed a higher number of gains at 14q23.1 (P = 0.15) and losses at 6q (P = 0.07). The BCL6− group had a higher frequency of genomic imbalances compared to the BCL6+ group. In conclusion, the BCL6+ and BCL6− non-GCB type of DLBCL appear to have different mechanisms of pathogenesis.     

Multicentre phase II study of CyclOBEAP plus rituximab in patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

The R‐CHOP regimen has been found to improve the outcome of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, it does not provide a satisfactory treatment outcome in the high‐risk group. We previously administered the CyclOBEAP regimen to patients with DLBCL, and reported its safety and efficacy. The R‐CyclOBEAP regimen was administered over a total period of 12 weeks, and rituximab 375 mg/m² was given every 2 weeks. There were 101 eligible patients. CR was achieved in 96 patients (95%). The 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate was 85% and progression‐free survival (PFS) rate was 76%. When the patients were divided according to the IPI, the 5‐year OS and PFS rates did not significantly differ among the risk groups. The 5‐year PFS of the germinal centre B‐cell group was 80% and that of the non‐GCB group was 74% (NS). Univariate analysis showed that the presence of B symptoms, extranodal lesions ≧2, and sIL‐2R were significant poor prognostic factors. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 91 patients and thrombocytopenia in 9 patients. The addition of rituximab to CyclOBEAP therapy may enhance the effect of CyclOBEAP therapy for DLBCL. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on clinical outcomes of patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

We performed a retrospective study to analyse the characteristics and clinical outcomes of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and compare with those without HBV infection. The occurrence of hepatitis after withdrawal of prophylactic antiviral treatment on completion of chemotherapy was also assessed. The HBsAg‐positive patients were given prophylactic antiviral treatment until 6 months after finishing chemotherapy. A total of 81 patients were recruited with 16 in the HBsAg‐positive group and 65 in the HBsAg‐negative group. The clinical characteristics were similar in both groups of patients. There was no significant difference in complete remission rate between the two groups (63% in HBsAg‐positive group vs. 54% in HBsAg‐negative group, P = 0.59). There was also no statistically significant difference in overall survival between the two groups (P = 0.23). Four of the 16 HBsAg‐positive patients (25%) had hepatitis after cessation of chemotherapy and prophylactic lamivudine. The mean time of onset of hepatitis was 3 months after stopping lamivudine. In conclusion, HBV infection did not appear to affect the prognosis of DLBCL patients given antiviral prophylaxis. It is reasonable to consider prophylactic antiviral therapy to extend to at least one year on completion of chemotherapy.     

Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND:

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical features and prognosis of patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of Waldeyer ring (WR‐DLBCL) and patients with lymph node DLBCL (N‐DLBCL).

METHODS:

One hundred eighty‐one patients with WR‐DLBCL and N‐DLBCL were reviewed. There were 57 patients with stage I disease, 83 patients with stage II disease, 26 patients with stage III disease, and 15 patients with stage IV disease. Among them, 101 patients had primary N‐DLBCL, and 80 patients had primary WR‐DLBCL.

RESULTS:

Patients with WR‐DLBCL and N‐DLBCL usually presented at an older age and had localized disease, a low frequency of B symptoms, a good performance status, and a low‐risk International Prognostic Index (IPI) score. Compared with patients who had N‐DLBCL, patients who had WR‐DLBCL presented with more stage II disease and lower tumor burdens. The overall response rate after treatment was similar in both groups. The 5‐year overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) rates were 76% and 61% in patients with WR‐DLBCL, respectively, and 56% and 50% in patients with N‐DLBCL, respectively (P = .119 for OS; P = .052 for PFS). IPI scores and elevated β2‐microglobulin and LDH levels were associated with a poor prognosis for patients who had WR‐DLBCL; whereas bulky tumor, elevated β2‐microglobulin levels, and IPI scores were associated with poor OS for patients who had N‐DLBCL.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current results supported the continued inclusion of WR‐DLBCL as a lymph node group in the staging of DLBCL. Patients with WR‐DLBCL had clinical features and prognosis similar to those of patients with N‐DLBCL. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Anemia as a useful biomarker in patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma treated with R‐CHOP immunochemotherapy

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the prognostic value of anemia, an easily estimable parameter in patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R‐CHOP) immunochemotherapy. A total of 157 patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma treated with ≥1 cycle of R‐CHOP were included. Hemoglobin level without red cell transfusion within 7 days of initiation of treatment was chosen as a parameter of baseline cancer‐induced anemia. To investigate the clinical significance of chemotherapy‐induced anemia and its recovery after completion of treatment, 87 patients in complete remission for ≥6 months from the time of the last cycle of R‐CHOP were grouped and analyzed separately. Patients with a cancer‐induced anemia of hemoglobin <10 g/dL showed inferior event‐free and disease‐free survival compared to those with hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL. This finding was observed irrespective of the status of pre‐treatment bone marrow involvement. In multivariate analysis, hemoglobin <10 g/dL was found to be an international prognostic index‐independent prognostic factor. Risk of relapse was significantly higher for patients who were still anemic at 6 months after R‐CHOP, compared to those who achieved complete recovery from chemotherapy‐induced anemia within 6 months.     

Chromosome instability in diffuse large B cell lymphomas is suppressed by activation of the noncanonical NF‐κB pathway

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of lymphoma in the United States. DLBCL comprises biologically distinct subtypes including germinal center‐like (GCB) and activated‐B‐cell‐like DLBCL (ABC). The most aggressive type, ABC‐DLBCL, displays dysregulation of both canonical and noncanonical NF‐κB pathway as well as genomic instability. Although, much is known about the tumorigenic roles of the canonical NF‐kB pathway, the precise role of the noncanonical NF‐kB pathway remains unknown. Here we show that activation of the noncanonical NF‐κB pathway regulates chromosome stability, DNA damage response and centrosome duplication in DLBCL. Analysis of 92 DLBCL samples revealed that activation of the noncanonical NF‐κB pathway is associated with low levels of DNA damage and centrosome amplification. Inhibiting the noncanonical pathway in lymphoma cells uncovered baseline DNA damage and prevented doxorubicin‐induced DNA damage repair. In addition, it triggered centrosome amplification and chromosome instability, indicated by anaphase bridges, multipolar spindles and chromosome missegregation. We determined that the noncanonical NF‐κB pathway execute these functions through the regulation of GADD45α and REDD1 in a p53‐independent manner, while it collaborates with p53 to regulate cyclin G2 expression. Furthermore, this pathway regulates GADD45α, REDD1 and cyclin G2 through direct binding of NF‐κB sites to their promoter region. Overall, these results indicate that the noncanonical NF‐κB pathway plays a central role in maintaining genome integrity in DLBCL. Our data suggests that inhibition of the noncanonical NF‐kB pathway should be considered as an important component in DLBCL therapeutic approach.     

Serum albumin level at diagnosis of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: an important simple prognostic factor

This study compared the value of several simple laboratory parameters with known prognostic models for predicting survival in patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The data of 157 adult patients with DLBCL diagnosed at Rabin Medical Center in 2004–2008 and treated with R‐CHOP immunochemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Main clinical features of the cohort were as follows: mean age 63.0 years, 43% male, 63% stage III/IV disease, 28% ECOG performance status > 2, 60% elevated lactate dehydrogenase level. Median duration of follow‐up was 6.6 years. The NCCN‐International Prognostic Index (IPI) was found to be a more powerful prognosticator than the IPI. Five‐year overall survival (OS) was 69.6; 73.6% for patients with intermediate NCCN‐IPI and 38.4% for patients with poor NCCN‐IPI. On univariate analysis, pretreatment hemoglobin and albumin levels were significantly associated with survival. By albumin level, 5‐year OS was 77.6 + 4% in patients with >3.5 g/dl and 53 + 7% in patients with < 3.5 g/dl (p < 0.001); 5‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) was 69.9% and 50.9%, respectively (p = 0.002). By hemoglobin level, 5‐year OS was 82.9 + 4.5% in patients with >12 g/dl and 58.8 + 5% in patients with < 12 g/dl (p = 0.007); 5‐year PFS was 75.5% and 54.1%, respectively (p = 0.008). On multivariate analysis with Cox regression, pretreatment albumin level was a significant independent predictor of OS. Furthermore, 5‐year OS of patients with a high NCCN‐IPI and albumin < 3.5 g/dl was 29.2% compared with 60% in patients with albumin > 3.5 g/dl (p = 0.022). In conclusion, pretreatment albumin level is a strong prognostic factor for OS in patients with DLBCL and can discriminate high‐risk patients for good and poor prognosis. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Immunophenotype and intermediate‐high international prognostic index score are prognostic factors for therapy in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients

BACKGROUND.

The development of gene expression profiling and tissue microarray techniques have provided more information about the heterogeneity of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL), enabling categorization of DLBCL patients into 3 prognostic groups according to cell origin (but independently from the International Prognostic Index [IPI] score): germinal center (GCB), activated B‐cell (ABC), and not classified (NC) diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. This study investigated the role of immunohistochemical discrimination between GCB and ABC&NC‐DLBCL subtypes in identifying those high‐risk patients who may benefit from a more aggressive first‐line therapeutic approach.

METHODS.

From February 2003 to August 2006, 45 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients, with IPI≥2, were considered eligible for this study: 13 had a GCB, 8 an ABC, and 24 a NC‐DLBCL. GCB patients received 6 courses of rituximab, cyclophophosphamide, doxorubicin, vinicristine, and prednisone (R‐CHOP) chemotherapy, with a subsequent, autologous stem cell transplantation in case of partial response. All ABC and NC‐DLBCL patients received 6 R‐CHOP cycles and autologous stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS.

Complete response rate for each treatment arm was 84.6% for GCB and 89.7% for ABC&NC‐DLBCL (P = .50), with a continuous complete response rate of 81.8% and 84.6%, respectively (P = .59). Projected 4‐year overall survival is 100% for GCB and 82% for ABC&NC patients (P = .12). Progression‐free survival is 77% and 79% (P = .7), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS.

The autologous stem cell transplantation consolidation in the ABC&NC‐DLBCL subtypes induced the same rate of complete response (and similar progression‐free survival rate) compared with GCB‐DLBCL. In ABC&NC‐DLBCL patients the authors observed a complete response rate of 89.7% vs. 84.6% in the GCB‐DLBCL subset, without any significant difference in progression‐free survival rate. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Epstein‐Barr virus‐positive diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma association is not only restricted to elderly patients

Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common group of malignant lymphomas, account for 30% of adult non‐Hodgkin lymphomas. The 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification included a new entity, Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV)+ DLBCL of the elderly, affecting patients aged 50 years or older. However, some reports of younger EBV+ DLBCL cases, without evidence of underlying immunosuppression, can be found. The role of EBV in tumor microenvironment composition in DLBCL is still not well understood. Our aim was to assess EBV presence and latency pattern as well as tumor T‐cell population in an adult DLBCL series of Argentina. The study was conducted on biopsies from 75 DLBCL patients. EBERs expression was performed by in situ hybridization, while EBV gene expression was analyzed using real‐time polymerase chain reaction. LMP1, LMP2A, EBNA2, EBNA3A, CD4, CD8 and Foxp3 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Nine percent of cases showed EBV expression, with similar frequency among patients younger than 50 years and 50 years or older (13% and 8%, respectively). T‐cell subsets were not altered by EBV presence. Latency type II was the most frequently observed, together with lytic gene expression in EBV+ DLBCL, with ≥20% of EBERs+ cells. These findings suggest that EBV+ DLBCL in our series was similar to the previously described in Asia and Latin‐America, displaying latency II or III expression profile and no age‐specific characteristics. Finally, EBV+ DLBCL may be an entity that is not only restricted to patients who are older than 50 years of age, in consequence the age cutoff revision may be a current goal.