可乐丽菲露AP-X复合树脂对人牙髓细胞毒性的研究

目的 通过细胞毒性试验，探讨可乐丽菲露AP-X复合树脂及其SEBOND粘接系统在临床上用于活髓牙窝洞直接修复术的安全性。方法选用年轻健康人新鲜离体牙髓，以组织块培养法及酶消化法进行原代培养。同时制备各材料样品，浸入DMEM培养基制取材料浸渍液。分别将各材料的浸渍液与第五代人牙髓细胞共同培养，以MTT法评价材料的细胞毒性。结果可乐丽菲露AP-X复合树脂的细胞毒性小于双组份玻璃离子水门汀Vitremer及复合树脂Z100，其差别具有统计学意义，与复合体F2000的细胞毒性无统计学意义的差别。可乐丽菲露的细胞毒性小于复合体F2000和复合树脂Z100对应粘接剂，且其差别具有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论可乐丽菲露AP-X复合树脂及其粘接剂的细胞毒性小于临床上现在常用的其他牙色类材料。     

Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Resin-modified glass ionomers and polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) have been introduced to provide esthetic restorations. However, there is concern about the marginal sealing ability of these materials, especially at the dentin (cementum) aspects of restorations. PURPOSE: This in vitro study evaluated the microleakage of Class V restorations made with resin-modified glass ionomers or a compomer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty noncarious human molar teeth were used. Standardized kidney-shaped Class V cavity preparations were placed in the buccal and lingual surfaces at the cementoenamel junction. Teeth were randomly assigned to 3 experimental groups of 10 teeth each and restored as follows: group 1, Fuji II LC; group 2, Vitremer; and group 3, Dyract. In all cases, the manufacturers' instructions were strictly followed. All materials were placed in a single increment. Unfinished restorations were immediately coated with the respective manufacturers' sealer or varnish and this was either light cured for 20 seconds or allowed to air-dry. After 24 hours, teeth were finished to contour and to the cavosurface margins, coated with nail varnish except for 1 mm around the restoration margin, thermocycled (1000x, 5-55 degrees C) and placed in a solution of 2% basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours at room temperature. The staining along the tooth restoration interface was recorded. RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance revealed significant differences among all restorative materials for the overall, occlusal, and gingival scores (P =.03, P =.01, P =.01, respectively). Occlusal and gingival scores for each matched pair of restorative materials using the Wilcoxon test showed statistically significant differences between Fuji II LC glass ionomer cement and Dyract composite, both for the occlusal (P =.005) and gingival (P =.005) margins and also as an overall evaluation (P =.01), with Fuji II LC showing the least dye penetration. Vitremer revealed dye penetration scores not significantly different from Fuji II LC glass ionomer cement or Dyract composite. CONCLUSION: Resin-modified glass ionomers showed less or similar microleakage than the polyacid-modified composite resin tested.     

Effect of delayed polishing periods on interfacial gap formation of Class V restorations

This in vitro study evaluated the effect of the initial polishing period through 30 minutes, 3 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 1 week after setting on the gap formation around Class V restorations. Three resin-modified glass ionomers, one compomer, one conventional glass ionomer and one microfilled composite were used as controls. When specimens of the two types of glass ionomers and a microfilled composite were polished immediately after the setting procedure, this study showed 100-140 gaps around the X-section of the restorations. In contrast, only 10-40 gaps around the Class V restoration were observed when the specimens were polished after 12 hours of storage. Significant differences were observed between polishing immediately and polishing after 12 hours of storage in the two glass ionomer restorative materials. The compomer did not show this pattern. No significant differences were observed among the six polishing periods of the sum number of gaps at the cavity-restoration interfaces. The tendency of Silux Plus was similar to the two types of glass ionomer materials; namely, when the specimen was polished and inspected after storage in water for 24 hours or one week, the authors observed almost 30 gaps around the restorative cavities.     

Postoperative dental bleaching: effect of microleakage on Class V tooth colored restorative materials

The effect of 3 percent, 11 percent, and 16 percent carbamide peroxide bleaching solutions and 35 percent hydrogen peroxide bleaching gel on microleakage of Class V composite resins, resin modified glass ionomer cements, and compomer restorative materials together with corresponding (if indicated) fourth/fifth generation bonding agents was evaluated using previously extracted human teeth. Five groups of Class V cavity preparations were placed in enamel of the facial surfaces of 200 teeth. Groups A through D included 40 restorations each (4 different restorative materials and their accompanying bonding agent multiplied by 10 teeth) treated with 3 percent, 11 percent, and 16 percent carbamide peroxide bleach and 35 percent hydrogen peroxide bleach. Group E included 40 restorations without treatment of bleach and stood as the control. The restorative materials included were: Fuji II LC resin modified glass ionomer cement, Helioprogress composite resin/-Heliobond adhesive system, Aelitefil composite resin/Allbond 2 adhesive and Dyract compomer material/Prime & Bond adhesive system. Bleaching agents included were Rembrandt 3 percent peroxide gel, Perfecta 16 percent carbamide peroxide gel, White & Brite 11 percent carbamide peroxide solution and Superoxyl 35 percent hydrogen peroxide gel. All teeth were thermally stressed for 100 cycles and microleakage were assessed by dye penetration. The results were tabulated using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) testing procedures. The Aelitefil composite resin material behaved the least favorably (relative to microleakage) compared to the other materials when exposed to various concentrations of dental bleaching agents.     

The weight change of various light-cured restorative materials stored in water

This study investigated weight changes of seven different light-cured composite restorative materials, one polyacid glass ionomer compomer, and one light-cured glass-ionomer cement following short-term and long-term storage in water. Two packable composites, three universal (hybrid) composites, one microglass composite, one polyacid glass ionomer resin composite (compomer), one microhybrid low-viscosity (flowable) composite, and one light cured glass ionomer composite cement were evaluated in this study. The weight changes of these specimens were measured daily (short-term storage), and they were measured after six weeks (long-term storage) using an electronic analytical balance. A significant difference was found in Ionoliner, Dyract AP, Opticor flow, Charisma, and Solitare 2, but no significant difference was found in the others (Filtek Z 250, Filtek P60, TPH Spectrum, and Valux Plus). Weight change showed a tendency to increase with the time of water storage. The greatest weight change occurred in light-cured glass ionomer composite cement (Ionoliner), which is followed in order by the weight changes in Dyract AP, Opticor Flow, Charisma, Solitare 2, Filtek Z250, Filtek P60, TPH Spectrum; Valux Plus had the least amount of change.     

Longevity of new hybrid restorative materials in class III cavities

The aim of this study was to evaluate the durability of two new tooth-colored restorative materials, a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. In an intra-individual comparison with a resin composite, the materials were studied during a 5-yr period. In 50 patients, 154 large class III restorations were placed. Most patients received one of each of the three materials. The restorations were evaluated by modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Of the 144 restorations evaluated, 15 were found unacceptable. No significant differences were seen between the materials concerning recurrent caries incidence. The resin composite showed a significantly better color match. No difference was found between resin composite fillings in enamel- or total-etched cavities. Significantly higher surface roughness was found in the aged resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations. Fracture of the incisal enamel corner was observed adjacent to 10 restorations. None of the three total-etch techniques resulted in postoperative sensitivity or loss of vitality. All the restorative techniques showed a low failure rate during the 5-yr follow-up.     

TOXICITY TESTING OF RESTORATIVE DENTAL MATERIALS USING BRINE SHRIMP LARVAE (ARTEMIA SALINA)

This study investigated the effect of extracts of different composites, glass ionomer cement (GIC)s and compomers on the viability of brine shrimp larvae. Ethanolic extracts of four dental composites (Z-100; Solitaire 2; Filtek P60 and Synergy), a conventional GIC (Ketac-Fil), a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Vitremer), two compomers (F2000; Dyract AP), and a flowable compomer (Dyract Flow) were prepared from each material. Following evaporation of the ethanol, the extracts were resuspended in distilled water, which was then used to test the effects on the viability of brine shrimp larvae. For the composites, the extract of Synergy was the least toxic (88% viability) followed by the extracts of Solitaire 2, Z100 and P60 (75%, 67.5% and 50% viability, respectively). One-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences between the resin composite materials (p<0.001). Follow-up comparison between the composite groups by Tukey''s pairwise multiple-comparison test (α =0.05) showed that the extract of Synergy was significantly less toxic than the extracts of all the other materials except that of Solitaire 2. The compomers showed 100% lethality, while the percentage of viable larvae for the extracts of Ketac-Fil, and Vitremer were 32.3%, and 37.0%, respectively. One-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences between the groups of materials (p<0.001). Follow-up comparison between the groups by Tukey''s test (α = 0.05) showed that the toxic effect of the extracts of the compomers were significantly greater than that of Ketac-Fil, and Vitremer. The differences in the toxic effects of Vitremer and Ketac-Fil were not statistically significant. In conclusion, the toxicity of composite materials varied according to their chemical composition. Compomers were the most lethal materials to brine shrimp larvae followed by GICs and then composites.     

Bacterial penetration of restored cavities

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of the marginal seals of 7 restoratives by means of a bacterial penetration test in vitro. Sixty intact premolars and third molars that were scheduled for extraction were used in the test. There were 2 experimental groups of teeth, as follows: (1) A class V conventional cavity and a wedge erosion cavity were prepared on the buccal surface and the lingual surface, respectively, of each tooth. (2) A class V conventional cavity and a wedge erosion cavity were prepared on the buccal surface and the lingual surface, respectively, of each tooth with a completely removed enamel layer. The cavities were then reconstructed with different restorative materials. The quality of the marginal seals was evaluated by submerging the teeth in a bacterial suspension and incubating them in an anaerobic milieu at 37 degrees C for 20 hours. The teeth were subsequently processed for histologic data and bacterial staining. The best marginal sealing in both the wedge erosion and the class V cavities was provided by the Herculite/Optibond system and the Valux Plus/Scotchbond Multipurpose system. Bacterial penetration was slightly greater with the Luxat compomer and the Dyrect compomer, as well as with Vitremer glass ionomer cement and Fuji LC glass ionomer cement. The bacterial penetration test showed that the use of restorative material does not entirely eliminate microleakage.     

SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interfacial micromorphology of direct esthetic restorations bonded to primary or permanent tooth dentin with a self-etching primer adhesive system. METHODS: Superficial dentin at the occlusal surface of 15 primary and 15 permanent molars was exposed with a carbide bur. Prompt-L-Pop was applied in one half of each surface. A control bonding system, Single Bond or Vitremer Primer, was used in the other half Teeth were restored either with a composite resin (Filtek Z250), a compomer (Hytac), or a resin-modified glass ionomer (Vitremer). Twenty-five scanning electron microscope fields from 5 teeth were evaluated blindly by two investigators for each condition. RESULTS: In this study, a significant difference in quality of the interfacial seal was not observed when restorations performed in primary teeth were compared to restorations in permanent teeth. Interfacial gaps were observed in most restorations bonded with Prompt-L-Pop and restored with Filtek Z250 (9/10), Hytac (9/10), or Vitremer (5/10). No interfacial gaps were observed in teeth bonded with Single Bond and restored with Filtek Z250 (0/10) or Hytac (0/10), while all teeth bonded with Vitremer Primer and restored with Vitremer presented gaps (10/10). To understand the reason for the interfacial gaps observed with Prompt-L-Pop, we examined if this system generated a hybrid layer at the dentin/restorative material interface. All surfaces bonded with Single Bond and restored with Filtek Z250 or Hytac presented a visible hybrid layer. In contrast, 0/10 (Z250) and only 3/10 (Hytac) restorations bonded with Prompt-L-Pop showed signs of a hybrid layer. CONCLUSION: The self-etching primer adhesive system Prompt-L-Pop failed to generate sealed interfaces consistently between the dentin of primary and permanent teeth and the composite resin or the compomer evaluated in this study.     

In vitro evaluation of the cariostatic action of esthetic restorative materials in bovine teeth under severe cariogenic challenge

Considering that caries around restorations is a serious problem in dentistry, and some restorative materials with fluoride may be important in inhibiting these lesions, this research is aimed at performing an in vitro evaluation of the cariostatic action of some esthetic restorative materials. Standardized cavities were prepared in the center of either intact blocks of bovine enamel or with bovine teeth containing early artificial carious lesions. The specimens were restored with a high viscosity glass ionomer cement (Molar Ketac), a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Vitremer), a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) and a conventional resin composite (Z-250). In addition to the restored specimens, four corresponding control groups were evaluated. All groups, except for two control groups, were subjected to a demineralization/remineralization cycling model for 14 days, simulating a situation of severe cariogenic challenge. The blocks were then longitudinally sectioned through the restorations. Mineral loss was evaluated in these specimens using the Knoop microhardness profiles in longitudinal sections at three different distances of the cavities and at eight distinct depths in relation to the external enamel surface. Statistical analysis of the results showed significant differences (p < 0.05) among the groups, although none of the study materials completely inhibited creation of the lesions. Vitremer demonstrated the best cariostatic action in intact bovine enamel. Ketac Molar, in intact or demineralized enamel, and Vitremer, in demineralized enamel, presented intermediate cariostatic potential. Z-250 and Dyract AP did not demonstrate any cariostatic effect. The data suggests that glass ionomer cements demonstrated better cariostatic action compared to the other restorative materials.     

The two-year clinical performance of esthetic restorative materials in noncarious cervical lesions

BACKGROUND: Materials used in restoration of cervical lesions include resin-modified glass ionomer cements, polyacid-modified resin-based composites and resin-based composites. In this study, the authors evaluated the clinical performance of these materials over a two-year period. METHODS: Thirty patients were enrolled in this study. The authors placed in these patients 130 restorations, 24 of which were Vitremer (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, Minn.), 38 were F2000 Compomer (3M Dental Products), 46 were Dyract AP (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) and 22 were Valux Plus (3M Dental Products). Enamel margins were not beveled, and no mechanical retention was placed. Two independent, calibrated examiners evaluated the restorations baseline and at one and two years after placement using modified U.S. Public Health Service criteria. RESULTS: Retention rates at the end of two years were 100 percent for Vitremer, 67 percent for F2000 Compomer, 68 percent for Dyract AP and 70 percent for Valux Plus. The retention rate of Vitremer was significantly higher than that of the others (P < .05). In other categories, however, Valux Plus had the most favorable performance (P < .05). No secondary caries was detected around any restoration. CONCLUSION: Vitremer, with its high retention rate, seems to be the most appropriate material for restoration of noncarious cervical lesions, though it does not have the esthetic properties of resin-based composites. All materials used in this study were in need of improvements. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin-based composite and resin-based composite behaved differently in the restoration of noncarious cervical lesions. Therefore, clinicians should take factors such as esthetic needs and localization into account in selecting materials for such restorations.     

洞形设计对Ⅴ类洞充填体边缘微渗漏影响的实验研究

目的:探讨5种洞形设计对复合体及光固化玻璃离子水门汀(LGIC)充填的V类洞边缘微渗漏的影响。方法:选用100颗人离体恒后牙,制备5种不同洞形,用复合体及LGIC分别充填。在体视显微镜下测量染液在龈壁渗入深度。2例标本在扫描电镜下观察材料与牙体的结合情况。结果:1.复合体充填的洞壁封闭性较LGIC更佳; 2.同种材料龈壁微渗漏高于壁;3.同种材料不同洞形微渗漏深度的比较,在壁无统计学差异,在龈壁,复合体充填的洞缘角为150b的V形洞微渗漏较盒状洞严重, LGIC充填的洞缘角为120b和135b的V形洞微渗漏较盒状洞轻。结论:复合体充填的洞壁封闭性较LGIC更佳。建议V形洞洞缘角不可制备过大。     

Effect of four intermediate layer treatments on microleakage of Class II composite restorations

This in vitro study examines the marginal sealing ability of four different intermediate materials applied before placement of a condensable composite. Class II preparations were made with gingival margins placed 1.0 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction of 60 extracted teeth, randomly assigned to five groups of 12. Following restoration, teeth were thermocycled, soaked in 0.5% basic fuchsin, and sectioned longitudinally. The resin-modified glass ionomer cement demonstrated significantly less microleakage than the use of a dentin bonding agent alone or in combination with flowable composite, flowable compomer, or autoploymerizing composite (p < 0.05, Dunn's test). This study supports the use of the glass ionomer open sandwich technique in deep Class II direct composite restorations.     

Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation

BACKGROUND: The authors retrospectively evaluated the clinical performance of one resin-modified glass ionomer cement as a restorative material in Class I, Class II, Class III and Class V restorations in primary teeth. METHODS: A total of 306 patients who had received a total of 864 resin-modified glass ionomer restorations, which had been in their mouths for a minimum of three years, were included in this evaluation. The authors assessed the clinical observations recorded in patients' records and used bitewing radiographs to assess Class II restorations. RESULTS: The authors found an overall restoration success rate of 93.0 percent, with Class I restorations having a 92.6 percent success rate, Class II restorations having a 93.3 percent success rate, Class III restorations having a 100 percent success rate, and Class V restorations having a 98.0 percent success rate. CONCLUSIONS: The resin-modified glass ionomer cement functioned well as a Class I, Class II, Class III and Class V restorative material in primary teeth. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Resin-modified glass ionomer restorative cement is a durable and reliable material to use for Class I, Class II, Class III and Class V restorations in primary teeth. Therefore, dentists have a proven alternative to silver amalgam and resin-based composite for primary tooth restoration.     

Effect of adhesives on the inhibition of secondary caries around compomer restorations

This study evaluated the effect of adhesives on the inhibition of secondary caries around compomer restorations in vitro. Two adhesive systems with a Bis-GMA resin, Scotch bond Multi-purpose (MP) and Single Bond (SB), and one adhesive system with no Bis-GMA resin, F2000 compomer primer/adhesive (PA), were used prior to placement of the compomer (F2000), and non-fluoride releasing resin composite (Z100) was used as a control. Class V cavities prepared on extracted human premolars were restored with various combinations of materials: F2000/MP, F2000/SB, F2000/PA, Z100/MP, Z100/SB and Z100/PA. The restored teeth were incubated in bacterial medium containing sucrose with Streptococcus mutans for two weeks after storage for 14 days. On microradiographs, the radio-opaque layers adjacent to the F2000 restorations were thick and clear, while the layers in the Z100 restorations were unclear. In the F2000 restorations, the mean thickness of the radio-opaque layers in the PA group was significantly greater than that of the MP and SB groups. In fluoride-releasing measurement, F2000 coated with PA showed a significantly higher amount of fluoride release than MP and SB, and no significant difference in the amount of fluoride release from uncoated F2000. These results indicated that applying an adhesive without Bis-GMA resin to compomer restoration has no suppressive effect on the fluoride release from compomer and might be beneficial for inhibiting secondary caries in vitro.     

Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around fluoride releasing materials

Replacement of restorations because of secondary caries is a continuing problem in restorative dentistry. This investigation assessed the capacity of fluoride-releasing restorative materials to resist caries in vitro when used in roots. Class 5 cavities were prepared in buccal and lingual surfaces of 30 extracted premolars and restored with one of three polyacid modified resin composites (F-2000, Hytac and Compoglass F), a resin modified glass-ionomer cement (Fuji II LC) a conventional glass ionomer (Ketac-Fil), and a resin composite (Z-100). After 5 weeks in an acid gel for caries-like lesion formation, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally and examined with polarized light. The results showed that restoration of caries with polyacid modified resin composites and resin modified glass ionomer cements may be of great importance in the prevention of secondary caries around the restorations in roots. Clinical Relevance Light cured fluoride-releasing restorations may inhibit caries-like lesions. Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around fluoride releasing materials.     

In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Despite the need for information about the wear characteristics of restorative materials, there have been few systemic studies of the factors that influence the rate of material wear. PURPOSE: This study compared the wear rates of enamel and 3 tooth-colored restorative materials under different loads (0, 3.2, 6.7, and 9.95 kg) and pH levels (1.2, 3.3, and 7.0). MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electromechanical tooth wear machine was used so that standard restorations representing 3 materials could be worn by opposing enamel under controlled conditions. The wear rates of enamel, composite (Z100), a conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX), and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC) were compared at a range of loads (0 to 9.95 kg) and pH levels (1.2 to 7.0) and also at different sites across each restoration. Ten specimens were randomly assigned to each experimental group. Wear assessment was performed with a modified light microscope to quantify the height changes at defined points across wear facets. Four-way analysis of variance was used to compare wear rates among materials, pH levels, loads, and sites. Post-hoc t tests identified significant differences between specific pairs of experimental conditions (P<.05). RESULTS: The wear rates of enamel and the other test materials varied significantly with pH (P<.0001), load (P<.0001), and type of material (P<.0001). Enamel wear was influenced most by varied pH, whereas the composite was least affected by acid. The conventional glass ionomer cement was more susceptible than the composite to the effects of varied pH; the acid susceptibility of the resin-modified glass ionomer cement was generally between that of the composite and conventional glass ionomer cement. Enamel and the conventional glass ionomer cement were affected similarly by load. The composite was more resistant than the conventional glass ionomer cement to wear at higher loads; the resin-modified glass ionomer cement exhibited intermediate load resistance. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the 3 test materials were more resistant than enamel to acid, with the composite demonstrating the lowest susceptibility to acid. The acid- and load-resistance of the resin-modified glass ionomer cement was consistently less than that of the composite and greater than that of the conventional glass ionomer cement.     

Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: A laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement

Acid-etching of enamel margins, often combined with bevelling and use of a low viscosity resin, has resulted in improved sealing of composite restorations. When enamel is absent and margins involve dentine or cementum, microleakage is more often observed. The use of glass ionomer cement, as both a restorative material and as a base combined with a veneer of composite resin, has been advocated as a means of minimizing microleakage where margins are placed in dentine or cementum. Four restorative techniques incorporating glass ionomer cement were used, in vitro, to restore cervical cavities. After thermal cycling, dye penetration was scored along occlusal and gingival margins. In all instances the gingival margin exhibited a less reliable seal than the occlusal margin. The sandwich restorations produced a superior seal at both occlusal and gingival margins when compared with glass ionomer restorative cement.     

Marginal leakage of visible light-cured glass ionomer restorative materials

This study examined the sealing of two visible light-cured glass ionomer restorative materials and a conventional glass ionomer. Class V cavity preparations were completed at the cementoenamel junction on the facial and lingual surfaces of extracted human molars. The cavity preparations were restored with either VariGlass VLC, GC Fuji II LC, or GC Fuji II glass ionomer cements. The restored teeth were thermocycled, immersed in fuchsin dye for 24 hours, sectioned, and evaluated with a measuring microscope. No microleakage occurred at the enamel/glass ionomer or dentin/glass ionomer cement interfaces of any samples, but the enamel adjacent to the VariGlass glass ionomer cement restorations exhibited crazing and staining.     

Fluoride release from restorative materials and a luting cement

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: In addition to conventional glass ionomers, a considerable number of different types of materials have been formulated to release fluoride. Variation in composition results in quantitative differences in the amount of fluoride release by these materials. PURPOSE: This study evaluated and compared fluoride release in distilled water from different types of restorative materials and a luting cement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fluoride release from 4 glass ionomer formulation restorative materials (Miracle-Mix, Fuji ionomer type III, Fuji II LC improved, and Ketac-Silver), a luting cement (Ketac Cem), a compomer (Compoglass Flow), 2 sealants (Fissurit F, Helioseal F), and a composite resin (Tetric) was evaluated at time intervals of 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours and 2, 3, 7, 14, 28, 56, and 112 days. Seven disks of each material were made and stored for equilibration in double distilled water at 37 degrees C for the time of each measurement. The equilibrated solution was analyzed for fluoride with a TISAB and an ion-specific combination electrode (ORION 960900) connected to an expandable ion analyzer (Crison micropH 2002). Data were analyzed by means of univariate analysis of variance, the Dunnett C post hoc test, and repeated measures analysis. RESULTS: Fluoride was released from all the evaluated materials, with considerable variation in the rate of release but a similar pattern. Among the materials tested, fluoride release from glass ionomer formulations was greater than that from composite resin formulations; the rank of decreasing order was as follows: Miracle Mix > Fuji III, Ketac Cem > Fuji II LC > Ketac Silver, Compoglass F > Fissurit F, Helioseal F > Tetric (> indicates statistical significance; P< .05). CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, glass ionomer formulations and the compomer released more fluoride than the sealants and the composite resin tested.