Efficacy of low dose peginterferon alpha-2b with ribavirin on chronic hepatitis C

INTRODUCTION The hepatitis C virus is a major cause of liver diseases affecting 170 million people worldwide[1]. In India, the estimated prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection is 1.8%. Genotypes 2 and 3 are predominant in Indian population[2]. Therapy …     

Impact of ribavirin dose on retreatment of chronic hepatitis C patients

AIM: To study the efficacy and factors associated with a sustained virological response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) relapsing patients.METHODS: Out of 1228 CHC patients treated with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV), 165 (13%) had a relapse. Among these, 62 patients were retreated with PEG-IFN-α2a or -α2b and RBV. Clinical, biological, virological and histological data were collected. Initial doses and treatment modifications were recorded. The efficacy of retreatment and predictive factors for SVR were analyzed.RESULTS: An SVR was achieved in 42% of patients. SVR was higher in young (< 50 years) (61%) than old patients (27%) (P = 0.007), and in genotype 2 or 3 (57%) than in genotype 1 or 4 (28%) patients (P = 0.023). Prolonging therapy for at least 24 wk more than the previous course was associated with higher SVR rates (53% vs 28%, P = 0.04). Also, a better SVR rate was observed with RBV dose/body weight > 15.2 mg/kg per day (70% vs 35%, P = 0.04). In logistic regression, predictors of a response were age (P = 0.018), genotype (P = 0.048) and initial RBV dose/body weight (P = 0.022). None of the patients without a complete early virological response achieved an SVR (negative predictive value = 100%).CONCLUSION: Retreatment with PEG-IFN/RBV is eff-ective in genotype 2 or 3 relapsers, especially in young patients. A high dose of RBV seems to be important for the retreatment response.     

Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for genotype Ib chronic hepatitis C in Japan

AIM：To evaluate the efficacy of pegylated interferon α-2b（peg-IFNα-2b） plus ribavirin（RBV） therapy in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C（CHC） genotype Ib and a high viral load.METHODS：One hundred and twenty CHC patients（58.3% male） who received peg-IFNα-2b plus RBV therapy for 48 wk were enrolled.Sustained virological response（SVR） and clinical parameters were evaluated.RESULTS：One hundred（83.3%） of 120 patients completed 48 wk of treatment.53 patients（44.3%） achieved SVR.Early virological response（EVR） and end of treatment response（ETR） rates were 50% and 73.3%,respectively.The clinical parameters（SVR vs non-SVR） associated with SVR,ALT（108.4 IU/L vs 74.5 IU/L,P = 0.063）,EVR（76.4% vs 16.4%,P 〈 0.0001）,adherence to peg-IFN（≥ 80% of planned dose） at week 12（48.1% vs 13.6%,P = 0.00036）,adherence to peg-IFN at week 48（54.7% vs 16.2%,P 〈 0.0001） and adherence to RBV at week 48（56.1% vs 32.1%,P = 0.0102） were determined using univariate analysis,and EVR and adherence to peg-IFN at week 48 were determined using multivariate analysis.In the older patient group（〉 56 years）,SVR in females was significantly lower than that in males（17% vs 50%,P = 0.0262）.EVR and adherence to Peg-IFN were demonstrated to be the main factors associated with SVR.CONCLUSION：Peg-IFNα-2b plus RBV combination therapy demonstrated good tolerability in Japanese patients with CHC and resulted in a SVR rate of 44.3%.Treatment of elderly female patients is still challenging and maintenance of adherence to peg-IFNα-2b is important in improving the SVR rate.     

Vitamin D in addition to peg-interferon-alpha/ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C virus infection: ANRS-HC25-VITAVIC study

AIM: To investigate if correction of hypovitaminosis D before initiation of Peg-interferon-alpha/ribavirin(Peg IFN/RBV) therapy could improve the efficacy of Peg IFN/RBV in previously null-responder patients with chronic genotype 1 or 4 hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection.METHODS:Genotype 1 or 4 HCV-infected patients with null response to previous Peg IFN/RBV treatment and with hypovitaminosis D(30 ng/m L)prospectively received cholecalciferol 100000 IU per week for 4 wk[from week-4(W-4)to W0],followed by 100000 IUper month in combination with Peg IFN/RBV for 12 mo(from W0 to W48).The primary outcome was the rate of early virological response defined by an HCV RNA12 IU/m L after 12 wk Peg IFN/RBV treatment.RESULTS:A total of 32 patients were included,19(59%)and 13(41%)patients were HCV genotype1 and 4,respectively.The median baseline vitamin D level was 15 ng/m L(range:7-28).In modified intention-to-treat analysis,29 patients who received at least one dose of Peg IFN/RBV were included in the analysis.All patients except one normalized their vitamin D serum levels.The rate of early virologic response was 0/29(0%).The rate of HCV RNA12IU/m L after 24 wk of Peg IFN/RBV was 1/27(4%).The safety profile was favorable.CONCLUSION:Addition of vitamin D to Peg IFN/RBV does not improve the rate of early virologic response in previously null-responders with chronic genotype 1or 4 HCV infection.     

Retreatment with peginterferon and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C

The development of boceprevir and telaprevir was a major step forward in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.In addition,the treatment of these infections has been recently revolutionized by the approval of sofosbuvir and simeprevir.However,there are several challenges associated with the application of noveldrugs,such as new and more frequent adverse events,new drug interactions,and excessively high treatment costs.An additional concern is viral resistance.These considerations highlight the fact that direct-acting antiviral agents are not a panacea and may not be the best option for all patients who are in need of therapy.This retrospective study revealed that the sustained virologic response was not significantly reduced following peginterferon and ribavirin retreatment compared with the new therapy.We suggest that patients who experience relapse shortly after completing treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin have a reasonable chance of achieving a sustained virologic response when retreated with these drugs alone.     

Long-term outcome of chronic hepatitis C patients with sustained virological response to peginterferon plus ribavirin

AIM: To assess the clinical, biochemical and virological long-term outcome in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with a sustained virological response (SVR) after peginterferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin combination therapy. METHODS: One hundred and fifty three patients with a SVR after treatment with PEG-IFN plus ribavirin were included in a 5-year follow-up study in a single Spanish center, based on standard clinical practice. Clinical anamnesis, biochemical analysis, hepatitis C virus RNA and alpha-fetopro...     

聚乙二醇干扰素联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者疗效及其影响因素分析

目的：观察聚乙二醇干扰素（PEG IFNα-2a）联合利巴韦林（RBV）治疗慢性丙型肝炎（CHC）患者的疗效及其影响因素。方法对331例慢性丙型肝炎患者予 PEG IFNα-2a（180μg/w 或135μg/w）联合利巴韦林（RBV）900~1200 mg/d 抗病毒治疗,疗程48～72 w,随访24 w;治疗前检测丙型肝炎病毒基因型,采用 PCR 法检测丙型肝炎病毒（HCV）RNA 水平及肝功能,以病毒学应答和生化学应答作为疗效的主要评价指标。结果在331例CHC 患者中,获得快速病毒学应答率（RVR）、早期病毒学应答率（EVR）和持续病毒学应答率（SVR）分别为65%（215/331）、94.9%（314/331）和84.9%（281/331）;对176例行基因分型,结果108例基因1型与68例非1型感染者SVR 分别为88.0%和79.4%,两组比较无明显差异;75例血清 HCV RNA 水平小于4×105 IU/ml 的患者 SVR 为93.3%,高于256例 HCV RNA 水平大于4×105 IU/ml 患者的82.4%（P〈0.05）;215例获得 RVR 的 CHC 患者的SVR 明显高于116例未获得 RVR 患者（92.6%对70.7%,x2=28.099,P=0.000）,314例获得 EVR 患者的 SVR 也明显高于17例未获得 EVR 组（88.5%对17.6%,x2=63.194,P=0.000）;50例未获得 SVR 的 CHC 患者年龄和感染丙型肝炎病毒的时间分别为（46±15）岁和（14.8±8.0）年,显著大或长于281例获得 SVR 患者[（38±13）岁和（11.5±7.7）年,P 均〈0.05]。结论聚乙二醇干扰素联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎疗效较好,预测临床疗效的关键因素是患者年龄、感染丙型肝炎的病程、治疗前 HCV RNA 水平及在治疗过程中能否及时获得 RVR 和 EVR。     

索非布韦联合α-干扰素治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者疗效比较的Meta分析

目的 评价索非布韦（SOF）联合α-干扰素（PEG-IFN）与索非布韦或干扰素治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的疗效。 方法 检索 PubMed、Cochrane Library、中国期刊全文数据库（CNKI）、中国生物医学文献数据库（CBM）、万方数据库及中文科技期刊全文数据库（VIP）等数据库,纳入索非布韦联合干扰素与索非布韦或干扰素治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的临床随机对照试验研究。采用Revman 5.2软件进行Meta分析。 结果 纳入9篇文献,共827例慢性丙型肝炎患者,其中5篇研究比较了SOF/PEG-IFN/利巴韦林（RBV）治疗的339例与SOF/RBV治疗的269例患者,4篇研究比较了SOF/PEG-IFN/RBV治疗的105例与PEG-IFN/RBV治疗的114例患者。Mate分析结果显示,SOF/PEG-IFN/RBV组快速病毒学应答率（RVR）显著高于SOF/RBV组（86.7% 对71.7%,P=0.002）,与PEG-IFN/RBV组比为91.7% 对32.3%（P=0.006）;SOF/PEG-IFN/RBV组持续病毒学应答率（SVR）显著高于PEG-IFN/RBV组（85.7%对44.2%,P<0.00001）,但与SOF/RBV组比,差异无统计学意义（89% 对74.1%,P=0.16）;SOF/PEG-IFN/RBV组头疼、疲劳、恶心、皮疹、肌痛、食欲减退、关节痛、发热、贫血发生率较SOF/RBV组高,且差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论 索非布韦联合α-干扰素和利巴韦林治疗相比索非布韦联合利巴韦林或聚乙二醇干扰素联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者可获得更高的快速病毒学应答率,而不良反应发生率也较索非布韦联合利巴韦林治疗组高。     

Serum complements C3 and C4 in chronic HCV infection and their correlation with response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment

Background and study aimsTo search for an immunological parameter that may correlate with the response to interferon (IFN) treatment is very crucial. The objective of this study was to correlate the levels of C3 and C4 complement components with the response to IFN treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.Patients and methodsThis study was conducted on 100 patients and control subjects classified into three groups. Group (I) consisted of 50 patients with chronic hepatitis C who were receiving IFN treatment and showed various responses; group (II) included 25 patients with chronic hepatitis C naive to IFN treatment; and group (III) included 25 healthy subjects matched for age and sex who served as controls. Measurement of the level of complement C3 and C4 was done by a quantitative turbidimetric test. Measurement of complement levels in group (I) was done at the end of treatment at the 48th week.ResultsSerum levels of C3 and C4 were found to be significantly reduced in all patients with chronic HCV infection in both groups (I and II) compared to the healthy control group (III) (p < 0.05). Moreover, chronic HCV patients treated with IFN and ribavirin had significantly lower levels of C3 and C4 compared with patients naive to IFN and ribavirin treatment. At the end of treatment, both C3 and C4 had significantly increased in responders to IFN when compared to non-responders (p = 0.025 and 0.05, respectively). There was a significant negative correlation between C3 and C4 levels and the concentration of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) measured simultaneously.ConclusionHigher C3 and C4 serum concentrations were found to be positively correlated to the end-of-treatment response in patients with chronic HCV infection treated with IFN and ribavirin.     

Immunogenicity of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced chronic hepatitis C patients： The effect of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment

AIM: To retrospectively evaluate the vaccination-induced anti-HBs seroconversion rates in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. Also to prospectively evaluate the seroconversion rates in CHC patients during pegylated interferon (PEG) plus ribavirin (RIB) treatment. METHODS: Seventy treatment-naive CHC patients (group A), 22 sustained virological responders-SVR following interferon (IFN) plus RIB treatment CHC patients (group B) and 121 healthy subjects (group C) had been participated in the same HBV vaccination schedule (20 microg, 0-1-6 mo). Seroconversion was considered if anti-HBs levels were above 10 mIU/mL within 3 mo following the third dose of the vaccine. Moreover, we prospectively selected 30 non-cirrhotic CHC patients and evaluated them for the efficacy of the same vaccine schedule randomizing them in two groups: Group-1, 15 CHC patients received the first dose of the vaccine in parallel with the initiation of PEG plus RIB treatment and Group-2, 15 patients received the same vaccination schedule without concomitant treatment. Determination of anti-HBs was performed at mo 1, 2, and 7. Statistical analysis of data was based on ANOVA student's t-test and chi-square analysis (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Fifty-eight of 70 group A patients (82.85%), 20/22 group B (90.9%) and 112/121 healthy subjects (92.56%) had been seroconverted. The seroconversion rates were significantly higher in the control group than in treatment-naive CHC patients (P = 0.04). The corresponding rates were comparable between group A and group B CHC patients (P = 0.38). The vast majority of non-responders (10/14, 71.43%) had been infected by genotype-1 of HCV. The seroconversion rates were comparable between group 1 and 2 CHC patients at mo 1 (20% versus 26.7%, P = 0.67), mo 2 (46.7% vs 60%, P = 0.46) and mo 7 (86.7% versus 93.3%, P = 0.54) of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The immunogenicity of HBV vaccine seems to be lower in CHC patients compared to healthy subjects. SVR following IFN plus RIB treatment does not affect the antibody response to HBV vaccine. Infection by genotype-1 seems to negatively influence the seroconversion rates. Vaccination against HBV during PEG plus RIB combination treatment is not beneficial in terms of anti-HBs seroconversion rates.     

Early virologic response after peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin or peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C

Patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and with serum HCV RNA concentrations over 800 000 IU/mL have relatively low rates of virologic response to pegylated interferons. The 2 forms of pegylated interferon have different pharmacokinetic profiles, and pilot studies comparing them have yielded varying results. We compared the virologic response to 12 weeks of treatment with peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin vs peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in 380 patients who were infected with HCV genotype 1 and had high viral loads. We observed no between-group differences in viral load reduction over time and no differences in the percentage of patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2a or peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin who achieved early virologic response (EVR), defined as >/=2-log reduction in HCV RNA concentration or undetectable HCV RNA at 12 weeks (66%vs 63%). Serum levels of interferon were more frequently below the level of quantitation in patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin (58-68%) than in those treated with peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin (1-2%). Patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin had higher rates of discontinuation for safety reasons (6%vs 1%). In conclusion, a substantial percentage of patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and high viral load can achieve EVR when treated with peginterferon and ribavirin. The 2 pegylated interferons showed comparable anti-HCV activity during the first 12 weeks of treatment when combined with the same doses of ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day), but discontinuations for safety reasons were higher in the patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin.     

High-dose interferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C not responding to recombinant alpha-interferon

BACKGROUND: Recently, the combination treatment of recombinant alpha-interferon plus ribavirin has been proposed for chronic hepatitis C patients unresponsive to previous therapy with recombinant alpha-interferon alone. AIM: To determine the effectiveness of the combination therapy for the re-treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients unresponsive to previous interferon therapy. Immediate and long-term follow-up data are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 100 patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to recombinant alpha-interferon 3 MU tiw, were randomly assigned to two groups of 50 patients each: Group A, treated with recombinant alpha-interferon therapy for an additional six months but at a double dosage (6 MU tiw) in association with ribavirin. Group B, same treatment as group A but without ribavirin. All patients responsive to therapy were then followed-up for at least 12 months. At the end of the treatment and at the end of the follow-up period, we distinguished between complete responses (return to normal of alanine aminotransferase with undetectable serum HCV-RNA] and biochemical responses (return to normal of alanine aminotransferase still with detectable viraemia). RESULTS: Side-effects were observed only in patients treated with recombinant alpha-interferon plus ribavirin: 12% discontinued the therapy due to haemolytic anaemia. In group A, the percentages of end-of-treatment complete response, end-of-treatment biochemical response, sustained complete response, and sustained biochemical response, were 38%, 20%, 8%, and 14%, respectively, whilst in group B, these percentages were 12%, 16%, 6%, and 16%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that in patients with chronic hepatitis C unresponsive to previous recombinant alpha-interferon therapy, re-treatment with higher recombinant alpha-interferon doses, either alone or in combination with ribavirin, lead to mild long-term benefit. However, the satisfactory end of treatment complete response in group A suggests that a significant percentage of patients are sensitive to the combination therapy; and that a more aggressive therapeutic protocol in this selected subset of patients could result in a larger number of long-lasting responses leading, in turn, to a more favourable cost-effect ratio.     

Efficacy and tolerability of peginterferon alfa‐2a or alfa‐2b plus ribavirin in the daily routine treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C in Germany: The PRACTICE Study

Summary. In randomized clinical trials, treatment with peginterferon plus ribavirin (RBV) results in a sustained virological response (SVR) in around half of hepatitis C virus genotype 1‐infected and 80% of genotype 2/3‐infected individuals. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of peginterferon alfa‐2a plus RBV compared with peginterferon alfa‐2b plus RBV for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in routine clinical practice. The intent‐to‐treat cohort consisted of 3414 patients treated with either peginterferon alfa‐2a plus RBV (Group A) or peginterferon alfa‐2b plus RBV (Group B) in 23 centres participating in the large, multicentre, observational PRACTICE study. Collected data included baseline characteristics, treatment regimen, RBV dose and outcome. Rates of early virological response, end of treatment response and SVR were 76.6%, 75.7% and 52.9% in Group A, and 70.2%, 65.6% and 50.5% in Group B, respectively. In patients matched by baseline parameters, 59.9% of patients in Group A and 55.9% in Group B achieved an SVR (P ≤ 0.051). In genotype 1‐infected patients matched by baseline parameters and cumulative RBV dose, SVR rates were 49.6% and 43.7% for Group A and Group B, respectively (P ≤ 0.047); when matched by baseline parameters and RBV starting dose, SVR rates were 49.9% and 44.6%, respectively (P = 0.068). Overall, 21.8% of group A and 29.6% of group B patients discontinued treatment (P ≤ 0.0001). The efficacy and tolerability of peginterferon plus RBV in this large cohort of patients treated in routine daily practice was similar to that in randomized clinical trials. In matched pairs analyses, more patients achieved an SVR with peginterferon alfa‐2a compared with peginterferon alfa‐2b.     

Expression of bcl-2 protein in chronic hepatitis C： Effect of interferon alpha 2b with ribavirin therapy

AIM: Mechanisms responsible for persistence of HCV infection and liver damage in chronic hepatitis C are not clear. Apoptosis is an important form of host immune response against viral infections. Anti-apoptotic protein bcl-2 expression on liver tissue as well as the influence of interferon alpha 2b (IFNa2b) and ribavirin (RBV) were analyzed in patients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: In 30 patients with chronic hepatitis C (responders - R and non-responders - NR) treated with IFNα2b+RBV, protein bcl-2 was determined in hepatocytes and in liver associated lymphocytes before and after the treatment. RESULTS: The treatment diminished bcl-2 protein accumulation in liver cells in_patients with hepatitis C (P<0.05). Before and after the therapy, we detected bcl-2 protein in R in 87±15% and 83±20% of hepatocytes and in 28±18% and 26±10% of liver-associated lymphocytes, respectively. In NR, the values before treatment decreased from 94±32% to 88±21% of hepatocytes and 39±29% to 28±12% of lymphocytes with bcl-2 expression. There was no statistical correlation between bcl-2 expression on liver tissue with inflammatory activity, fibrosis and biochemical parameters before and after the treatment. CONCLUSION: IFNα2b+RBV treatment, by bcl-2 protein expression decrease, enables apoptosis of hepatocytes and associated liver lymphocytes, which in turn eliminate hepatitis C viruses.     

Peginterferon and ribavirin treatment for hepatitis C virus infection

Pegylated interferon α (IFNα) in combination with ribavirin is currently recommended as a standard-of-care treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This combination therapy has drastically improved the rate of sustained virological response, specifically in difficult-to-treat patients. Recently, individualized treatment, such as response-guided therapy, is being developed based on host-, HCV- and treatment-related factors. Furthermore, modified regimens with currently available medications, ...     

Immunogenicity of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in treatment-nave and treatment-experienced chronic hepatitis C patients: The effect of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment

AIM: To retrospectively evaluate the vaccination-induced anti-HBs seroconversion rates in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. Also to prospectively evaluate the seroconversion rates in CHC patients during pegylated interferon (PEG) plus ribavirin (RIB) treatment. METHODS: Seventy treatment-naive CHC patients (group A), 22 sustained virological responders-SVR following interferon (IFN) plus RIB treatment CHC patients (group B) and 121 healthy subjects (group C) had been participated in the same HBV vaccination schedule (20μg, 0-1-6 mo). Seroconversion was considered if anti-HBs levels were above 10 mIU/mL within 3 mo following the third dose of the vaccine. Moreover, we prospectively selected 30 non-cirrhotic CHC patients and evaluated them for the efficacy of the same vaccine schedule randomizing them in two groups: Group-1, 15 CHC patients received the first dose of the vaccine in parallel with the initiation of PEG plus RIB treatment and Group-2, 15 patients received the same vaccination schedule without concomitant treatment. Determination of anti-HBs was performed at mo 1, 2, and 7. Statistical analysis of data was based on ANOVA student's t-test and chi-square analysis (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Fifty-eight of 70 group A patients (82.85%), 20/22 group B (90.9%) and 112/121 healthy subjects (92.56%) had been seroconverted. The seroconversion rates were significantly higher in the control group than in treatment-naive CHC patients (P = 0.04). The corresponding rates were comparable between group A and group B CMC patients (P = 0.38). The vast majority of non-responders (10/14, 71.43%) had been infected by genotype-1 of HCV. The seroconversion rates were comparable between group 1 and 2 CHC patients at mo 1 (20% versus 26.7%, P = 0.67), mo 2 (46.7% vs 60%, P = 0.46) and mo 7 (86.7% versus 93.3%, P = 0.54) of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The immunogenicity of HBV vaccine seems to be lower in CHC patients compared to healthy subjects. SVR following IFN plus RIB treatment does not affect the antibody response to HBV vaccine. Infection by genotype-1 seems to negatively influence the seroconversion rates. Vaccination against HBV during PEG plus RIB combination treatment is not beneficial in terms of anti-HBs seroconversion rates.     

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the treatment of chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon alfa-2a or peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in Spain

BackgroundAn independent meta-analysis of randomized comparative trials of peginterferons alfa-2a and alfa-2b, both combined with ribavirin, analyzed the probability of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR).ObjectiveTo estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon alfa-2a (180 μg/week) plus ribavirin (800–1200 mg/day) vs. alfa-2b (1.5 μg/kg/week) plus ribavirin (800–1400 mg/day), from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System.MethodsA Markov model was developed with 7 health states to simulate lifetime disease progression. SVR was calculated from the meta-analysis data. Transition probabilities and health state utilities were obtained from published literature. Direct healthcare costs were obtained from the drug catalog, while costs of disease-related complications were obtained from published studies and healthcare cost database. Costs were expressed in 2010€. The annual discount rate applied was 3.5% for both costs and benefits.ResultsSVR rate for treatment with alfa-2a was higher than with alfa-2b; the differences were 6.0%, 7.6% and 8.7% for all genotypes, genotypes 1/4 and genotypes 2/3, respectively. Each patient would gain 0.469, 0.600 and 0.685 life-years and 0.155, 0.198 and 0.227 quality-adjusted life-years with alfa-2a vs. alfa-2b, for the respective genotypes. The cost saving per patient treated with alfa-2a would be €705, €672 and €1900, for all genotypes and for genotypes 1/4 and 2/3, respectively, alfa-2a being dominant.ConclusionsAccording to the present model, treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon alfa-2a is cost-effective compared with peginterferon alfa-2b, both combined with ribavirin.     

Directly observed therapy for chronic hepatitis C: A randomized clinical trial in the prison setting

Background

The diagnosis and treatment of chronic hepatitis C are major concerns in prisons.

Objectives

The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to determine the extent to which directly observed therapy (DOT) improved the efficacy of the standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C in the prison setting.

Patients and methods

A randomized clinical trial was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of a DOT compared with a self-administered therapy in prison inmates who underwent standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C (based on pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin).

Results

A total of 252 inmates were randomized, of which 244 were analyzed: 109 in the DOT group and 135 in the non-DOT group. The mean age was 35.88 years (SD 6.54), 94.3% were men, 72.1% reported intravenous drug use, 21.3% were HIV co-infected, and 55.3% had genotype 1 or 4. The patients received the study treatment for a median time of 33.9 weeks in the overall sample. Sustained virological response was achieved in 60.6% (95% CI, 51.17–69.22) of the DOT group and in 65.9% (95% CI, 57.59–73.38) of the standard therapy group (risk ratio = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76–1.12). The mean proportion of patients continuing the treatment was 83% (SD = 31). Adverse events were reported in 93.4% of the patients, and serious adverse events were reported in 8.2%, with no significant differences between groups.

Conclusions

Sustained virological response was remarkably high, although there were no differences between groups, probably due to high treatment adherence.