Digital rectal stimulation as an intervention in persons with spinal cord injury and upper motor neuron neurogenic bowel. An evidenced-based systematic review of the literature

Context: Need for evidential support of practice guideline recommendations for management of neurogenic bowel management in adults with spinal cord injury.Objective: To determine evidence for digital rectal stimulation (DRS) as an intervention in the management of upper motor neuron neurogenic bowels (UMN-NB) in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).Methods: A systematic review of the literature including research articles and practice guidelines evaluating upper motor neuron neurogenic bowel treatments and the use of digital rectal stimulation was performed using OvidMedline, PubMed and the Cochrane database and included research articles and practice guidelines. Limitations were made related to English language, patient age and focus on spinal cord injured patients. Strength of evidence was assessed using the Johns Hopkins Nursing evidence-based practice model.Results: Eleven articles were included in the systematic review. Only one used DRS as a primary intervention. There was moderate evidence for DRS in persons with SCI and UMN-NB. There was evidence of the physiologic effect of DRS and support for combining DRS with other treatment regimens.Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to promote any one intervention for the management of UMN-NB. The promotion of DRS, and education as to the proper technique for DRS should remain an emphasis of education of home management of UMN-NB in persons with SCI. Future research should focus on the use of standardized, validated tools to evaluate management techniques for UMN-NB.     

Neurogenic bowel dysfunction score

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire study. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a symptom-based score for neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD): NBD score. SETTING: University Hospital of Aarhus, Denmark. METHODS: A questionnaire including questions about background parameters (n=8), faecal incontinence (n=10), constipation (n=10), obstructed defecation (n=8), and impact on quality of life (QOL) (n=3) was sent to 589 Danish spinal cord injured (SCI) patients. The reproducibility and validity of each item was tested in 20 and 18 patients, respectively. Associations between items and impact on QOL were determined by logistic regression analysis. The NBD score was constructed from items with acceptable reproducibility and validity that were significantly associated with impact on QOL. Based on odds ratios for associations between items and impact on QOL, each item was given a corresponding number of points in the NBD score. RESULTS: A total of 424 SCI patients responded. The following 10 items met the criteria above: frequency of bowel movements (0-6 points), headache, perspiration or discomfort before or during defecation (0-2 points), tablets and drops against constipation (0-2 points each), time used for each defecation (0-7 points), frequency of digital stimulation or evacuation (0-6 points), frequency of faecal incontinence (0-13 points), medication against faecal incontinence (0-4 points), flatus incontinence (0-2 points) and perianal skin problems (0-3 points). Differences in NBD score among patients reporting no, little, some or major impact on QOL were statistically significant (all P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Based on valid and reproducible questions, we have constructed a score for NBD that is correlated to impact on QOL.     

A comparison of patient outcomes and quality of life in persons with neurogenic bowel: standard bowel care program vs colostomy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare patient outcomes and quality of life for people with neurogenic bowel using either a standard bowel care program or colostomy. METHODS: We analyzed survey data from a national sample, comparing outcomes between veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI) who perform bowel care programs vs individuals with colostomies. This study is part of a larger study to evaluate clinical practice guideline implementation in SCI. The sample included 1,503 veterans with SCI. The response rate was 58.4%. For comparison, we matched the respondents with colostomies to matched controls from the remainder of the survey cohort. A total of 74 veterans with SCI and colostomies were matched with 296 controls, using propensity scores. Seven items were designed to elicit information about the respondent's satisfaction with their bowel care program, whereas 7 other items were designed to measure bowel-related quality of life. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in satisfaction or quality of life were found between the responses from veterans with colostomies and those with traditional bowel care programs. Both respondents with colostomies and those without colostomies indicated that they had received training for their bowel care program, that they experienced relatively few complications, such as falls as a result of their bowel care program, and that their quality of life related to bowel care was generally good. However, large numbers of respondents with colostomies (n = 39; 55.7%) and without colostomies (n = 113; 41.7%) reported that they were very unsatisfied with their bowel care program. CONCLUSION: Satisfaction with bowel care is a major problem for veterans with SCI.     

Prevalence of upper motor neuron vs lower motor neuron lesions in complete lower thoracic and lumbar spinal cord injuries

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and etiology of lower motor neuron (LMN) vs upper motor neuron (UMN) lesions in patients with complete thoracic and lumbar spinal cord injuries (SCI). DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: A regional Model Spinal Cord Injury System center. METHODS: A consecutive sample of medical records of patients with lower thoracic and upper lumbar (T7-L3) complete SCI admitted from 1979 through 1996 was systematically reviewed. Of the 306 patients evaluated, 156 subjects met inclusion criteria. The incidence and etiology of LMN vs UMN lesions were determined for the following neurologic levels: T7-T9, T10-T12, L1-L3. Lesions were classified as LMN, UMN, or mixed on the basis of the presence or absence of (1) the bulbocavernosus reflex, (2) lower limb deep tendon reflexes below the neurologic level of injury, and (3) the Babinski sign. RESULTS: The incidences of LMN, UMN, and mixed lesions in the T7-T9, T10-T12, and L1-L3 groups were as follows: T7-T9 group (7.3% LMN, 85.5% UMN, 7.3% mixed), T10-T12 group (57% LMN, 17.7% UMN, 25.3% mixed),L1-L3 group (95.5% LMN, 0.0% UMN, 4.5% mixed). Etiology of injury did not significantly influence the likelihood of a LMN lesion. CONCLUSIONS: One cannot determine the type of lesion (UMN vs LMN) on the basis of the neurological level of injury. A detailed clinical examination, including sacral reflexes, is required. This has important prognostic and therapeutic implications for bowel, bladder, and sexual function, as well as mobility. Distinguishing UMN lesions from LMN lesions is also essential for evaluating new interventions in clinical trials for UMN pathology.     

A physiologic approach to bowel training

Bowel training is an effective management option for many patients with dysfunctional bowel elimination patterns and neurogenic fecal incontinence. To be effective, a bowel training program must be based on sound physiologic principles and must be individualized for each patient. This article includes a review of the structures and physiologic processes controlling normal defecation and the physiologic principles governing bowel training. The steps involved in successful implementation of a bowel training program are discussed, and case studies are used to illustrate the principles.     

Clinical evaluation and management of neurogenic bowel after spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVES: To assess the state of the neurological bowel in spinal cord injured (SCI) patients, design and apply a program for the comprehensive management of neurogenic bowel and evaluate outcome. SETTING: Out-patient in a Rehabilitation Service. SUBJECTS: Thirty-eight SCI patients, 12 (32%) with complete lesions of more than 5 years duration. DESIGN: Observational, longitudinal and prospective. Pre and post intervention. METHOD: Pre and post SCI intestinal function was evaluated clinically prior to beginning program. The presence of GI symptoms were studied. Laboratory work-up included colonic transit time (CTT), anorectal manometry and recto-colonoscopy. An intestinal program was designed, in order to achieve an effective and efficient evacuation in a predictable and socially acceptable time, to avoid short and long term complications and eliminate inadequate intestinal evacuation habits. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pre and post SCI difficulty in intestinal evacuation (DIE) was increased (from 2.6% to 26.3%). The most frequent GI symptom was abdominal distention (53%). Colonic inertia was present in 49% of CTT, internal anal sphincter pressure was normal or increased in 77% and rectoanal inhibitory reflex was present in 88%. With the intestinal program, the incidence of DIE was reduced to 8.8%, manual extraction (ME) was reduced from 53% to 37%. Excellent and good results were obtained in 56% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The proposed intestinal program is effective in the rehabilitation of SCI patients with neurogenic bowel. It is essential to initiate these physiological and safe procedures as soon as possible after sustaining the injury; this will lead to better results and to the elimination of inadequate intestinal maneuvering in the future Spinal Cord (2000) 38, 301 - 308.     

Provider adherence to implementation of clinical practice guidelines for neurogenic bowel in adults with spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) have been published on a number of topics in spinal cord injury (SCI) medicine. Research in the general medical literature shows that the distribution of CPGs has a minimal effect on physician practice without targeted implementation strategies. The purpose of this study was to determine (a) whether dissemination of an SCI CPG improved the likelihood that patients would receive CPG recommended care and (b) whether adherence to CPG recommendations could be improved through a targeted implementation strategy. Specifically, this study addressed the "Neurogenic Bowel Management in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury" Clinical Practice Guideline published in March 1998 by the Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine METHODS: CPG adherence was determined from medical record review at 6 Veterans Affairs SCI centers for 3 time periods: before guideline publication (T1), after guideline publication but before CPG implementation (T2), and after targeted CPG implementation (T3). Specific implementation strategies to enhance guideline adherence were chosen to address the barriers identified by SCI providers in focus groups before the intervention. RESULTS: Overall adherence to recommendations related to neurogenic bowel did not change between T1 and T2 (P = not significant) but increased significantly between T2 and T3 (P < 0.001) for 3 of 6 guideline recommendations. For the other 3 guideline recommendations, adherence rates were noted to be high at T1. CONCLUSIONS: While publication of the CPG alone did not alter rates of provider adherence, the use of a targeted implementation plan resulted in increases in adherence rates with some (3 of 6) CPG recommendations for neurogenic bowel management.     

A Comparison of Patient Outcomes and Quality of Life Persons With Neurogenic Bowel: Standard Bowel Care Program Vs Colostomy

Abstract

Background/Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare patient outcomes and quality of life for people with neurogenic bowel using either a standard bowel care program or colostomy.

Methods: We analyzed survey data from a national sample, comparing outcomes between veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI) who perform bowel care programs vs individuals with colostomies. This study is part of a larger study to evaluate clinical practice guideline implementation in SCI. The sample included 1,503 veterans with SCI. The response rate was 58.4%. For comparison, we matched the respondents with colostomies to matched controls from the remainder of the survey cohort. A total of 74 veterans with SCI and colostomies were matched with 296 controls, using propensity scores. Seven items were designed to elicit information about the respondent's satisfaction with their bowel care program, whereas 7 other items were designed to measure bowel-related quality of life.

Results: No statistically significant differences in satisfaction or quality of life were found between the responses from veterans with colostomies and those with traditional bowel care programs. Both respondents with colostomies and those without colostomies indicated that they had received training for their bowel care program, that they experienced relatively few complications, such as falls as a result of their bowel care program, and that their quality of life related to bowel care was generally good. However, large numbers of respondents with colostomies (n = 39; 55.7%) and without colostomies (n = 113; 41.7%) reported that they were very unsatisfied with their bowel care program.

Conclusion: Satisfaction with bowel care is a major problem for veterans with SCI.     

Effect of stoma formation on bowel care and quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury

INTRODUCTION: Bowel management is a significant source of concern for patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and may significantly alter quality of life. The effect of colostomy formation on both quality of life and time taken for bowel care is well recorded. We report our experience of intestinal stoma formation in SCI patients. METHODS: Medical records from the spinal unit, operating theatres and stoma clinics were reviewed to identify SCI patients for whom a stoma had been formed. Patients were interviewed using a standard questionnaire. Average age at injury was 29 years (range 6-62 years). Mean time from injury to stoma formation was 17 years (range 0-36.25 years) and the mean period of poor bowel function prior to stoma was 8 years (range 1.5-25). RESULTS: The average time spent on bowel care per week decreased from 10.3 h (range 3.5-45) prior to stoma formation to 1.9 h (range 0.5-7.75) afterwards (P<0.0001, paired t-test). In all, 18 patients felt that a stoma gave them greater independence and quality of life was described as much better by 25 patients. Complications occurred in 14 patients - eight described leakage of mucus and occasionally blood and pus per rectum, three developed parastomal hernias and three developed bowel obstruction. CONCLUSION: Elective stoma formation is a safe and well-accepted treatment for the management of chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with SCI.     

Seat belt use before and after motor vehicle trauma

BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle crashes cause significant morbidity and mortality annually. Seat belt use has partially been associated with a decreased risk of morbidity and mortality among those involved in motor vehicle crashes. Persons injured in motor vehicle crashes and not wearing seat belts have an increased risk of admission to trauma centers for motor vehicle crash-related injury. The purpose of this study was to measure changes in seat belt use after discharge among patients admitted to a Level I trauma center for injuries sustained in motor vehicle crashes. METHODS: Patients admitted to a Level I trauma center for injuries sustained in motor vehicle crashes during 1998 were eligible for participation. A telephone interview was conducted with a random sample of 136 eligible patients regarding patterns of seat belt use before and after their collision. Demographic data and clinical characteristics were also collected. The frequency of seat belt use before and after crash involvement was compared for all patients and stratified by age, gender, race, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). RESULTS: Slightly over half (54%) of patients reported "always" wearing a seat belt before their collision compared with 85% afterward. Younger age groups, male subjects, and whites had the largest increases in the frequency of seat belt use after collision (45%, 37%, and 44% increases, respectively). With respect to injury severity, the largest increase in the frequency of seat belt use was among those with ISS of 15 to 25 (82% increase). Significant concordance between patient- and emergency medical service-reported use of seat belts was observed. Among subjects reported by emergency medical service personnel to have been restrained, nearly 90% reported belt use at the time of the telephone interview. The most frequently cited occasion for failure to use seat belts (30%) was when taking short trips. Other reported reasons were forgetting to fasten belts (29%), discomfort (10%), being in a rush (8%), riding in the back seat (4%), and that seat belts were unnecessary when riding with a good driver (3%). CONCLUSION: Involvement in a motor vehicle crash results in increased seat belt use. Prevention efforts should be directed toward those patients who report infrequent use. Patient "converts" to seat belt use after collisions may be useful in public awareness and prevention campaigns.     

Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease

Objective: To provide an overview of clinical assessments and diagnostic tools, self-report measures (SRMs) and data sets used in neurogenic bladder and bowel (NBB) dysfunction and recommendations for their use with persons with spinal cord injury /disease (SCI/D).

Methods: Experts in SCI/D conducted literature reviews, compiled a list of NBB related assessments and measures, reviewed their psychometric properties, discussed their use in SCI/D and issued recommendations for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Common Data Elements (CDEs) guidelines.

Results: Clinical assessments included 15 objective tests and diagnostic tools for neurogenic bladder and 12 for neurogenic bowel. Following a two-phase evaluation, eight SRMs were selected for final review with the Qualiveen and Short-Form (SF) Qualiveen and the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS) being recommended as supplemental, highly-recommended due to their strong psychometrics and extensive use in SCI/D. Two datasets and other SRM measures were recommended as supplemental.

Conclusion: There is no one single measure that can be used to assess NBB dysfunction across all clinical research studies. Clinical and diagnostic tools are here recommended based on specific medical needs of the person with SCI/D. Following the CDE for SCI studies guidelines, we recommend both the SF-Qualiveen for bladder and the NBDS for bowel as relatively short measures with strong psychometrics. Other measures are also recommended. A combination of assessment tools (objective and subjective) to be used jointly across the spectrum of care seems critical to best capture changes related to NBB and develop better treatments.     

Optimal treatment for severe neurogenic bowel dysfunction after chronic spinal cord injury: a decision analysis

BACKGROUND: When conservative management fails in patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and neurogenic bowel dysfunction, clinicians have to choose from a variety of treatment options which include colostomy, ileostomy, Malone anterograde continence enema (MACE) and sacral anterior root stimulator (SARS) implantation. This study employed a decision analysis to examine the optimal treatment for bowel management of young individuals with chronic refractory constipation in the setting of chronic SCI. METHODS: A decision analysis was created to compare the four surgical strategies using baseline analysis, one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses, 'worst scenario' and 'best scenario' sensitivity analyses, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) was the primary outcome. RESULTS: The baseline analysis indicated that patients who underwent the MACE procedure had the highest QALE value compared with the other interventions. Sensitivity analyses showed that these results were robust. CONCLUSION: The MACE procedure may provide the best long-term outcome in terms of the probability of improving bowel function, reducing complication rates and the incidence of autonomic dysreflexia, and being congruent with patients' preferences. The analysis was sensitive to changes in assumptions about quality of life/utility, and thus the results could change if more specific estimates of utility became available.     

Orthostatic hypotension in the first month following acute spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis. OBJECTIVES: To determine prevalence of orthostatic hypotension (OH) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) during the acute rehabilitation period. SETTING: Quaternary care spinal unit, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with acute SCI stratified by neurological level (cervical, 55 (62%); upper thoracic, 12 (13%); lower thoracic, 22 (25%)), and graded by American Spinal Injury Association standards. Non-invasive measurement of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were made at baseline and 3 min following an orthostatic challenge test administered during the first month after SCI. RESULTS: Patients with cervical or upper thoracic motor complete SCI more frequently experienced OH (P<0.01). OH persisted during the first month following SCI in 74% of cervical and only 20% of upper thoracic motor complete SCI patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with cervical and upper thoracic motor complete SCI are more likely to experience persistent OH than those with lower level or motor incomplete SCI during the first month of rehabilitation.     

Propofol reduces spinal motor neuron excitability in humans

IMPLICATIONS: We investigated in humans whether changes in spinal motor neuron excitability correlate with the predicted propofol concentration (Cpt) achieved by a target-controlled infusion system. Propofol suppressed F-wave persistence in a Cpt-dependent manner, indicating that propofol depresses spinal motor neuron excitability at clinically relevant concentrations.     

MR在脊柱裂脊膜膨出患者人工反射弧手术中的应用

目的：探讨MR在人工反射弧术前诊断、术后随访中的应用价值。方法：对67例脊柱裂脊膜膨出修补术后大小便功能障碍的患者建立人工体神经-内脏神经反射弧,以修复膀胱直肠功能。参照尿动力学检查结果,对比研究术前、术后MR的改变。结果：67例患者MR术前检查结果均经手术证实。20例患者术后随访2年以上,17例获得控尿和自主排尿功能,其中13例患者用MR检查随访,10例膀胱功能恢复的患者MR检查与术前无明显变化,而3例膀胱功能无改善者脊髓的走行、圆锥位置较术前改变不明显,圆锥末端与周围组织瘢痕增生、脂肪堆积较术前有加重趋势。结论：在应用人工体神经-内脏神经反射弧治疗先天性脊柱裂脊膜膨出所致大小便失禁时,MR对术前诊断、手术方案制定有较高的应用价值;在术后随访时,MR对治疗失败的患者有重要参考价值。     

Fournier gangrene in spinal cord injury: a case report

BACKGROUND: Fournier gangrene is a necrotizing fasciitis of the perineal and genital region resulting from polymicrobial infection in which infection spreads along fascial planes, causing soft-tissue necrosis. If surgical debridement and control of infection are delayed, the disease can progress and result in septic shock, multiorgan failure, and death. Initial symptoms are severe pain in the genital region followed by swelling and erythema. In patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), lack of pain sensation could cause delay in seeking medical attention. SCI patients are at higher risk for Fournier gangrene secondary to neurogenic bladder, neurogenic bowel, and impaired sensation. A literature search resulted in only 1 report of Fournier gangrene with localized necrosis of the scrotum in a patient with SCI. METHODS: Case report of a 47-year-old man with C4 tetraplegia. RESULTS: Patient presented with a necrotic ulceration on the ventral aspect of the penis and scrotum of 2 days duration and was diagnosed with fulminant Fournier gangrene. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SCI are at higher risk for Fournier gangrene secondary to neurogenic bladder, neurogenic bowel, and impaired sensation. Mortality is high. Prevention and early diagnosis are essential. Prompt aggressive intervention is warranted to maximize outcomes.     

Intestinal diversion (colostomy or ileostomy) in patients with severe bowel dysfunction following spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) affects motor and sensory nervous integrity resulting in paralysis of lower or both upper and lower extremities, as well as autonomic nervous system function resulting in neurogenic bowel. SCI leads to diminished or lost sensations of the need to defecate or inability to distinguish the presence of gas versus liquid versus solid stool in the rectal vault. Sensory loss, incomplete evacuation of stool from the rectal vault, immobility, and reduced anal sphincter tone increase the risk of fecal incontinence. Gastrointestinal symptoms are associated with depression, anxiety, and significant impairments in quality of life (QOL) in a significant portion of persons with SCI. OBJECTIVES: 1. To compare clinical, functional, or quality of life outcomes in spinal cord injured patients with gastrointestinal symptoms managed by conservative measures versus intestinal diversion (colostomy or ileostomy). 2. To identify complications associated with ostomy surgery in patients with bowel dysfunction and SCI. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic review of electronic databases MEDLINE and CINAHL (from January 1960 to November 2007) was undertaken using the following key words: (1) ostomy, (2) stoma, (3) colostomy, and (4) ileostomy. Boolean features of these databases were used to combine these terms with the key word "spinal cord injuries." Prospective and retrospective studies that directly compared clinical, functional, QOL outcomes or satisfaction among patients with intestinal diversions to patients managed by conservative means were included. RESULTS: Creation of an ostomy in selected patients provides equivocal or superior QOL outcomes when compared to conservative bowel management strategies. Both colostomy and ileostomy surgery significantly reduce the amount of time required for bowel management. Patients who undergo ostomy surgery tend to be satisfied with their surgery, and a significant portion report a desire to be counseled about this option earlier. There are no clear advantages when functional, clinical, or QOL outcomes associated with colostomy are compared to those seen in SCI patients undergoing ileostomy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: 1. The WOC nurse plays a pivotal role in both conservative bowel management and the decision to undergo ostomy surgery. 2. Preoperative stoma site marking is vital for the best surgical outcome. 3. The system best suited to an individual is based on a variety of factors including but not limited to stoma location, type of effluent, peristomal plane and contours, and the individual's capabilities and preferences. 4. Some individuals with a sigmoid or descending colostomy may benefit from colostomy irrigation as a management method. 5. Postoperatively, assessment of pressure points for signs of tissue breakdown, evaluation of treatment methods for existing pressure ulcers with suitable modification, and support surface assessment should be included in ongoing annual follow-up visits.