In vitro activities of daptomycin and other antimicrobial agents against vancomycin-resistant gram-positive bacteria.

A comparative evaluation of daptomycin and eight other antimicrobial agents was performed by the agar dilution technique with 56 strains of vancomycin-resistant gram-positive bacteria, including Leuconostoc, Lactobacillus, and Pediococcus spp. Erythromycin, deptomycin, clindamycin, and gentamicin exhibited the greatest activities, whereas penicillin, ampicillin, and cefotaxime showed moderate activities. The organisms were all highly resistant to vancomycin and cefoxitin.     

In vitro activity of CI-934 and other antimicrobial agents against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria

The activity of CI-934, a new carboxy-quinolone antibiotic, against gram-positive cocci and bacilli and gram-negative bacilli was compared with that of reference antibiotics. CI-934 demonstrated excellent activity against gram-positive organisms, including Corynebacterium sp. In addition, although the activity of CI-934 against gram-negative bacilli was less than that reported for similar agents, it was comparable to that of aminoglycosidic aminocyclitol antibiotics.     

In vitro activities of 17 antimicrobial agents against the formate/fumarate-requiring, anaerobic gram-negative bacilli

The in vitro activities of 17 antimicrobial agents were evaluated against 46 clinical isolates of formate/fumarate-requiring anaerobic gram-negative bacilli. Strains of Bacteroides ureolyticus (23) were almost uniformly susceptible to the tested antimicrobials, whereas strains of Bacteroides gracilis (18) showed some striking resistance with penicillin active against only 67%, the cephalosporins active against 67%-89%, and clindamycin active against 67%. Although few strains of Wolinella species/C. concisus (5) were available for testing, these isolates tended to be more resistant than B. ureolyticus but less resistant than B. gracilis.     

In vitro activities of linezolid combined with other antimicrobial agents against Staphylococci,Enterococci, Pneumococci,and selected gram-negative organisms

The activities of linezolid, an oxazolidinone antibacterial agent active against gram-positive organisms, alone and in combination with 35 antimicrobial agents were tested in vitro against methicillin-sensitive (n = 1 to 2 strains) and methicillin-resistant (n = 8 to 10) Staphylococcus aureus strains; vancomycin-sensitive (n = 6) and vancomycin-resistant (n = 6 to 8) Enterococcus faecalis strains; vancomycin-sensitive (n = 5) and vancomycin-resistant (n = 6) Enterococcus faecium strains; penicillin-sensitive (n = 2 to 5), penicillin-intermediate (n = 5 to 6), and penicillin-resistant (n = 5 to 6) Streptococcus pneumoniae strains; Escherichia coli (n = 6); and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 6). The fractional inhibitory concentration indices of linezolid in combination with other antimicrobial agents for the organisms tested were generated on checkerboard broth microdilution plates prepared by a semiautomated method. Of 1,380 organism-drug combinations, 1,369 (99.2%) combinations of linezolid with 28 antimicrobial drugs were indifferent, 9 combinations (0.65%) of linezolid with 6 drugs (amoxicillin, erythromycin, imipenem, sparfloxacin, teicoplanin, and tetracycline) were synergistic, and 2 combinations (0.15%) of linezolid with 2 drugs (ofloxacin and sparfloxacin) were antagonistic. Overall, the in vitro data demonstrated that linezolid combined with other antimicrobial agents primarily produces an indifferent response, with infrequent occurrences of synergism and antagonism.     

In vitro activities of meropenem and other antimicrobial agents against British meningococcal isolates.

The in vitro activity of meropenem was compared with those of penicillin, ampicillin, cefuroxime, cetriaxone, cefotaxime, rifampicin, chloramphenicol, sulphadiazine and ciprofloxacin against 121 British meningococcal isolates by a microdilution method in Mueller-Hinton broth and by the E test. All meningococcal strains were susceptible to the agents except for ampicillin (88.4%), penicillin (88.4%), sulphadiazine (57.9%) and rifampicin (95%). The emergence of resistance problems among meningococcal isolates stresses the need for their constant monitoring and of the development of new agents. In this study we have shown that meropenem is highly active in vitro against Neisseria meningitidis. Recent studies have indicated that meropenem is highly active clinically and bacteriologically in the treatment of bacterial meningitis. Thus, the potentials of meropenem as meningococcal prophylactic and therapeutic agent needs to be fully evaluated.     

Comparative in vitro activities of pristinamycin, its components, and other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria.

Using an agar dilution technique, we compared the activities of pristinamycin and its components PIA and PIIA with those of penicillin G, cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, metronidazole, and clindamycin against 200 strains of anaerobic bacteria isolated from suppurative lesions. The antimicrobial activity of pristinamycin was similar to that of chloramphenicol. On the basis of these results and because of its antistaphylococcal and antistreptococcal activities and its absence of toxicity, pristinamycin might be a valuable therapeutic agent for treating mixed aerobic-anaerobic cutaneous infections.     

替加环素等14种抗菌药物对多重耐药菌的体外抗菌活性研究

目的 评价替加环素等14种抗菌药物对多重耐药细菌的体外抗菌活性.方法 采用微量肉汤稀释法测定替加环素对临床分离的214株多重耐药细菌(MRSA、肠球菌属细菌、鲍曼不动杆菌、产ESBLs大肠埃希菌、产ESBLs肺炎克雷伯菌和肠杆菌属细菌)的MIC,并与其他13种抗菌药物进行比较.数据分析采用WHONET 5.4软件.结果 多重耐药的MRSA对替加环素、万古霉素和利奈唑胺的敏感性均为100%.多重耐药的肠球菌属(粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌)对替加环素和利奈唑胺的敏感率均为100%,万古霉素敏感率为93.1%,2株万古霉素耐药的多重耐药屎肠球菌对替加环素和利奈唑胺均呈敏感,MIC90值分别为0.064 mg/L和1 mg/L.37株多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌对替加环素的敏感率为97.3%,MIC90值为2 mg/L,其中16株耐美罗培南的鲍曼不动杆菌对替加环素的敏感率仍为100%,MIC90值为2 mg/L.产ESBLs大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌对替加环素和美罗培南的敏感率均为100%,但替加环素的MIC90值均高于美罗培南.多重耐药的肠杆菌属细菌(阴沟肠杆菌和产气肠杆菌)对替加环素的敏感率为86.5%,MIC90值为4 mg/L.结论 替加环素对多重耐药的常见需氧革兰阳性球菌和革兰阴性杆菌均有良好的体外抗菌活性.     

In vitro activities of SCH27899 alone and in combination with 17 other antimicrobial agents

SCH27899, an everninomicin antibiotic, was tested for its in vitro activity against 718 bacterial isolates representing 27 species. The Enterobacteriaceae and nonenteric gram-negative bacilli were resistant to > or = 8.0 microg/ml, but all others were inhibited by < or = 1.0 microg/ml. When tested in combination with 17 other antimicrobial agents against 110 strains, SCH27899 demonstrated no significant antagonism or synergy. Consequently, combination therapy is not contraindicated.     

In vitro activity of cefotetan compared with that of other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria.

The activity of cefotetan against 430 strains of anaerobic bacteria was compared with that of cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, clindamycin, metronidazole, and chloramphenicol. Percent susceptible values for the Bacteroides fragilis group were 60, 80, 29, 86, 100, and 100%, respectively. Percent susceptible values for the B. fragilis species were 91, 92, 46, 98, 100, and 100%, respectively. Non-B. fragilis-group Bacteroides species were inhibited very well (90 to 100%) by all drugs except ceftizoxime (80%). Cefotetan and metronidazole were the most active agents against Clostridium difficile. Percent susceptible values for all strains were 72, 79, 44, 82, 93, and 98%, respectively.     

In vitro activity of amdinocillin in combination with other beta-lactam antibiotics against aminoglycoside-susceptible and resistant gram-negative bacteria

Amdinocillin alone and in combination with other beta-lactam antibiotics was tested for in vitro activity against aminoglycoside-susceptible and resistant gram-negative bacteria. Amdinocillin alone or in combination with ampicillin, ticarcillin, piperacillin, cefazolin, cefoxitin, and cefamandole had little to no activity against aminoglycoside-resistant E. coli, E. cloacae, K. pneumoniae, and S. marcescens. There was better activity with aminoglycoside-susceptible organisms, however, Overall, there was significantly more antagonism of amdinocillin combinations when tested with aminoglycoside-resistant organisms than with aminoglycoside-susceptible strains.     

In vitro activities in new oxazolidinone antimicrobial agents against enterococci.

The comparative in vitro activities of two new oxazolidinone antimicrobial agents, U-100592 and U-100766, against 180 isolates of enterococci representing several resistance profiles were examined by using an agar dilution technique. The two oxazolidinones inhibited all isolates, including strains resistant to vancomycin, ampicillin, and minocycline, at concentrations between 1 and 4 micrograms/ml.     

In vitro activities of cefepime alone and with amikacin against aminoglycoside-resistant gram-negative bacteria.

The in vitro activity of cefepime was compared with those of ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and cefpirome against aminoglycoside-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Cefepime was the most active cephalosporin, with a MIC for 90% of strains tested for all non-Pseudomonas aeruginosa species of less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml. No cefepime resistance was encountered among members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Of the 40 aminoglycoside-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates, 15% were resistant to cefepime, compared with 18% for ceftazidime, 30% for cefpirome, and 35% for cefotaxime. Synergism between cefepime and amikacin was observed and occurred most frequently in P. aeruginosa strains resistant to cefepime but susceptible to amikacin. In no case did cefepime and amikacin exhibit antagonism against P. aeruginosa.     

In vitro activity of meropenem and other agents against oral bacteria.

The susceptibility of 106 oral bacteria to meropenem, a new carbapenem antimicrobial, penicillin V, tetracycline and metronidazole was assessed by an agar dilution method. Meropenem was the most effective of the antimicrobials, with all strains tested being inhibited at < or = 1 mg/l. A number of strains were resistant to penicillin V, particularly Bacteroides gracilis, and tetracycline resistance was widespread amongst the streptococci tested. Metronidazole was extremely effective against obligate anaerobes. The results of this study suggest that meropenem has potential for use in the treatment of serious head and neck infections.     

利奈唑胺、替加环素、达托霉素、头孢吡普等抗菌药物对MRSA的抗菌活性

目的多中心研究我国2005年MRSA的耐药现状，评价利奈唑胺、替加环素、达托霉素和头孢吡普等药物的抗菌活性。方法收集2005年1月至2005年12月14个地区连续分离的非重复金葡菌809株，采用琼脂稀释法测定抗菌药物的MIC。结果MRSA发生率为50．3％，其中MRSA发生率最高的为大连（93．3％）、上海（80．3％），其次为南宁（63．6％）、北京（55．5％）、青岛（53．8％）。MRSA对红霉素的敏感性为4．2％，喹诺酮类药物为4．4％～12．6％，庆大霉素为9．6％，四环素为11．1％，对MRSA活性较高的有氯霉素（82．3％）和复方磺胺甲嗯唑（78．6％）；MRSA对替考拉宁、万古霉素、利奈唑胺、替加环素、达托霉素和头孢吡普均全部敏感。头孢吡普、达托霉素、替加环素、利奈唑胺的MIC50和MIC90分别为2，2mg／L；0．5，0．5mg／L；0．125，0．25mg／L；1，2mg／L。MIC范围分别为0．125～2mg／L，0．125～1mg／L,0.064～0．5mg／L，0．25～2mg／L。结论我国MRSA发生率高，多重耐药严重，不同地区MRSA发生率有所差异，头孢吡普、达托霉素、替加环素和利奈唑胺对于MRSA具有很高的抗菌活性。     

Antibacterial activity of Ro 17-2301 and other antimicrobial agents against cefotaxime-resistant aerobic gram-negative bacilli.

The in vitro activity of Ro 17-2301 was determined and compared with those of aztreonam, ceftazidime, amikacin, and piperacillin against 141 cefotaxime-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Ro 17-2301 was bactericidal, and its activity against the majority of these organisms was equal or superior to those of ceftazidime, aztreonam, and piperacillin. An inoculum effect of Ro 17-2301 and aztreonam for many Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp. isolates was demonstrated.     

In vitro activity of sparfloxacin and other antimicrobial agents against genital pathogens.

The in vitro activity of sparfloxacin was determined for 60 strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, 15 strains of Chlamydia trachomatis and 40 strains each of Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum and compared with those of ampicillin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, ofloxacin, temafloxacin and tetracycline. Sparfloxacin was active against all the strains studied and appeared to be the most potent quinolone tested. Sparfloxacin had the lowest MICs against N. gonorrhoeae (MICs 0.002-0.06 micrograms/ml). Its MICs against C. trachomatis (0.03-0.06 micrograms/ml) were higher than those of clarithromycin but lower than those of the other antimicrobial agents. Sparfloxacin was particularly active against tetracycline-susceptible as well as resistant strains of M. hominis (MICs, 0.06 micrograms/ml) and U. urealyticum (MICs 0.125-1 micrograms/ml). Because of this in vitro activity and its tissue distribution, sparfloxacin might be a valuable therapeutic agent for treating major bacterial sexually transmitted diseases.     

In vitro activities of tritrpticin alone and in combination with other antimicrobial agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The in vitro activity of the cathelicidin tritrpticin was investigated against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The isolates were susceptible to the peptide at concentrations of 0.50 to 8 mg/liter. Tritrpticin completely inhibits lipopolysaccharide procoagulant activity at a 10 microM concentration. Fractionary inhibitory concentration indexes (0.385, 0.312, and 0.458) demonstrated synergy between the peptide and beta-lactams.     

In vitro activities of retapamulin and 16 other antimicrobial agents against recently obtained Streptococcus pyogenes isolates

Retapamulin in vitro activity against 400 Streptococcus pyogenes clinical isolates obtained from skin, pharynx, ear fluid, and blood samples recovered from 2007 to 2009 was studied. The isolates belonged to 26 different emm types, including isolates nonsusceptible to erythromycin (n=187), tetracycline (n=99), ciprofloxacin (n=59), and bacitracin (n=43). Results were compared to the activities of 16 other antibiotics for topical and systemic use. Retapamulin MICs ranged from ≤0.015 to 0.12 μg/ml, showing the highest intrinsic activity among the topical antimicrobial drugs studied.     

Comparative in vitro activities of pristinamycin and other antimicrobial agents against genital pathogens.

The MICs of pristinamycin for genital pathogens were compared with those of ampicillin, tetracycline, erythromycin, and ciprofloxacin. Pristinamycin was active against all the strains studied. Because of this activity and its lack of toxicity, pristinamycin might be a valuable therapeutic agent for treating major sexually transmitted diseases.     

In vitro activity of cefoperazone plus sulbactam compared with that of other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria.

The activity of two cefoperazone-sulbactam combinations against anaerobic bacteria was tested and compared both with that of cefoperazone alone and with that of other commonly used antimicrobial agents. Imipenem was the most active of the tested agents, followed by chloramphenicol, metronidazole, and cefoperazone-sulbactam (90 to 100% of bacterial growth inhibited). Clindamycin and cefoxitin inhibited approximately 80%, cefoperazone inhibited 63%, and penicillin G inhibited 47% of the strains tested. The agents were variable in activity against the Bacteroides fragilis group, with percents susceptible as follows: cefoperazone-sulbactam, imipenem, metronidazole, and chloramphenicol, 99 to 100%; cefoxitin and clindamycin, approximately 80%; cefoperazone, 49%; and penicillin G, 15.5%.