Meperidine Decreases the Shivering Threshold Twice as Much as the Vasoconstriction Threshold

Background: Meperidine administration is a more effective treatment for shivering than equianalgesic doses of other opioids. However, it remains unknown whether meperidine also profoundly impairs other thermoregulatory responses, such as sweating or vasoconstriction. Proportional inhibition of vasoconstriction and shivering suggests that the drug acts much like alfentanil and anesthetics but possesses greater thermoregulatory than analgesic potency. In contrast, disproportionate inhibition would imply a special antishivering mechanism. Accordingly, the authors tested the hypothesis that meperidine administration produces a far greater concentration-dependent reduction in the shivering than vasoconstriction threshold.

Methods: Nine volunteers were each studied on three days: 1) control (no opioid); 2) a target total plasma meperidine concentration of 0.6 micro gram/ml (40 mg/h); and 3) a target concentration of 1.8 micro gram/ml (120 mg/h). Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased to provoke sweating and then subsequently reduced to elicit vasoconstriction and shivering. Core-temperature thresholds (at a designated skin temperature of 34 degrees Celsius) were computed using established linear cutaneous contributions to control sweating (10%) and vasoconstriction and shivering (20%). The dose-dependent effects of unbound meperidine on thermoregulatory response thresholds was then determined using linear regression. Results are presented as means +/- SDs.

Results: The unbound meperidine fraction was [nearly equal] 35%. Meperidine administration slightly increased the sweating threshold (0.5 +/- 0.8 degrees Celsius [center dot] micro gram sup -1 [center dot] ml; r2 = 0.51 +/- 0.37) and markedly decreased the vasoconstriction threshold (-3.3 +/- 1.5 degrees Celsius [center dot] micro gram sup -1 [center dot] ml; r sup 2 = 0.92 +/- 0.08). However, meperidine reduced the shivering threshold nearly twice as much as the vasoconstriction threshold (-6.1 +/- 3.0 degrees Celsius [center dot] micro gram sup -1 [center dot] ml; r2 = 0.97 +/- 0.05; P = 0.001).     

Nefopam, a Nonsedative Benzoxazocine Analgesic, Selectively Reduces the Shivering Threshold in Unanesthetized Subjects

Background: The analgesic nefopam does not compromise ventilation, is minimally sedating, and is effective as a treatment for postoperative shivering. The authors evaluated the effects of nefopam on the major thermoregulatory responses in humans: sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering.

Methods: Nine volunteers were studied on three randomly assigned days: (1) control (saline), (2) nefopam at a target plasma concentration of 35 ng/ml (low dose), and (3) nefopam at a target concentration of 70 ng/ml (high dose, approximately 20 mg total). Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased to provoke sweating and then reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. The authors determined the thresholds (triggering core temperature at a designated skin temperature of 34[degrees]C) by mathematically compensating for changes in skin temperature using the established linear cutaneous contributions to control of each response.

Results: Nefopam did not significantly modify the slopes for sweating (0.0 +/- 4.9[degrees]C [middle dot] [mu]g-1 [middle dot] ml; r2 = 0.73 +/- 0.32) or vasoconstriction (-3.6 +/- 5.0[degrees]C [middle dot] [mu]g-1 [middle dot] ml; r2 = -0.47 +/- 0.41). In contrast, nefopam significantly reduced the slope of shivering (-16.8 +/- 9.3[degrees]C [middle dot] [mu]g-1 [middle dot] ml; r2 = 0.92 +/- 0.06). Therefore, high-dose nefopam reduced the shivering threshold by 0.9 +/- 0.4[degrees]C (P < 0.001) without any discernible effect on the sweating or vasoconstriction thresholds.     

Epidural Anesthesia Reduces the Gain and Maximum Intensity of Shivering

Background: Shivering can be characterized by its threshold (triggering core temperature), gain (incremental intensity increase), and maximum intensity. The gain of shivering might be preserved during epidural or spinal anesthesia if control mechanisms compensate for lower-body paralysis by augmenting the activity of upper-body muscles. Conversely, gain will be reduced approximately by half if the thermoregulatory system fails to compensate. Similarly, appropriate regulatory feedback might maintain maximum shivering intensity during regional anesthesia. Accordingly, the gain and maximum intensity of shivering during epidural anesthesia were determined.

Methods: Seven volunteers participated on two randomly ordered study days. On one day (control), no anesthesia was administered; on the other, epidural anesthesia was maintained at a T8 sensory level. Shivering, at a mean skin temperature near 33 [degree sign] Celsius, was provoked by central-venous infusion of cold fluid; core cooling continued until shivering intensity no longer increased. Shivering was evaluated by systemic oxygen consumption and electromyography of two upper-body and two lower-body muscles. The core temperature triggering an increase in oxygen consumption identified the shivering threshold. The slopes of the oxygen consumption versus core temperature and electromyographic intensity versus core temperature regressions identified systemic and regional shivering gains, respectively.

Results: The shivering threshold was reduced by epidural anesthesia by [nearly =] 0.4 [degree sign] Celsius, from 36.7 +/- 0.6 to 36.3 +/- 0.5 [degree sign] Celsius (means +/- SD; P < 0.05). Systemic gain, as determined by oxygen consumption, was reduced from -581 +/- 186 to -215 +/- 154 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] [degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (P < 0.01). Lower-body gain, as determined electromyographically, was essentially obliterated by paralysis during epidural anesthesia, decreasing from -0.73 +/- 0.85 to -0.04 +/- 0.06 intensity units/[degree sign] Celsius (P < 0.01). However, upper-body gain had no compensatory increase: -1.3 +/- 1.1 units/[degree sign] Celsius control versus -2.0 +/- 2.1 units/[degree sign] Celsius epidural. Maximum oxygen consumption was decreased by one third during epidural anesthesia: 607 +/- 82 versus 412 +/- 50 ml/min (P < 0.05).     

Propofol Linearly Reduces the Vasoconstriction and Shivering Thresholds

Background: Skin temperature is best kept constant when determining response thresholds because both skin and core temperatures contribute to thermoregulatory control. In practice, however, it is difficult to evaluate both warm and cold thresholds while maintaining constant cutaneous temperature. A recent study shows that vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds are a linear function of skin and core temperatures, with skin contributing 20 plus/minus 6% and 19 plus/minus 8%, respectively. (Skin temperature has long been known to contribute [nearly equal] 10% to the control of sweating.) Using these relations, we were able to experimentally manipulate both skin and core temperatures, subsequently compensate for the changes in skin temperature, and finally report the results in terms of calculated core- temperature thresholds at a single designated skin temperature.

Methods: Five volunteers were each studied on 4 days: (1) control; (2) a target blood propofol concentration of 2 micro gram/ml; (3) a target concentration of 4 micro gram/ml; and (4) a target concentration of 8 micro gram/ml. On each day, we increased skin and core temperatures sufficiently to provoke sweating. Skin and core temperatures were subsequently reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. We mathematically compensated for changes in skin temperature by using the established linear cutaneous contributions to the control of sweating (10%) and to vasoconstriction and shivering (20%). From these calculated core-temperature thresholds (at a designated skin temperature of 35.7 degrees Celsius), the propofol concentration- response curves for the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds were analyzed using linear regression. We validated this new method by comparing the concentration-dependent effects of propofol with those obtained previously with an established model.

Results: The concentration-response slopes for sweating and vasoconstriction were virtually identical to those reported previously. Propofol significantly decreased the core temperature triggering vasoconstriction (slope = 0.6 plus/minus 0.1 degree Celsius *symbol* micro gram sup -1 *symbol* ml sup -1; r2 = 0.98 plus/minus 0.02) and shivering (slope = 0.7 plus/minus 0.1 degree Celsius *symbol* micro gram sup -1 *symbol* ml sup -1; r2 = 0.95 plus/minus 0.05). In contrast, increasing the blood propofol concentration increased the sweating threshold only slightly (slope = 0.1 plus/minus 0.1 degree Celsius *symbol* micro gram sup -1 *symbol* ml sup -1; r2 = 0.46 plus/minus 0.39).     

Isoflurane Alters Shivering Patterns and Reduces Maximum Shivering Intensity

Background: Shivering can be characterized by its threshold (triggering core temperature), gain (incremental intensity increase with further core hypothermia), and maximum response intensity. Isoflurane produces a clonic muscular activity that is not a component of normal shivering. To the extent that clonic activity is superimposed on normal thermoregulatory shivering, the gain of shivering might be increased during isoflurane anesthesia. Conversely, volatile anesthetics decrease systemic oxygen consumption and peripherally inhibit skeletal muscle strength, which might limit maximum intensity despite central activation. The purpose of the present study was, therefore, to evaluate the effect of isoflurane shivering patterns and the gain and maximum intensity of shivering.

Methods: Ten volunteers were each studied in two separate protocols: (1) control (no drug) and (2) 0.7% end-tidal isoflurane. On each day, the mean skin temperature was maintained at 31 [degree sign] Celsius. Core temperature was then reduced by infusion of cold fluid until shivering intensity no longer increased. The core temperature triggering the initial increase in oxygen consumption defined the shivering threshold. The gain of shivering was defined by the slope of the core temperature versus oxygen consumption regression. Pectoralis and quadriceps electromyography was used to evaluate anesthetic-induced facilitation of clonic (5-7 Hz) muscular activity.

Results: Isoflurane significantly decreased the shivering threshold from 36.4 +/- 0.3 to 34.2 +/- 0.8 [degree sign] Celsius. The increase in oxygen consumption was linear on the control day and was followed by sustained high-intensity activity. During isoflurane administration, shivering was characterized by bursts of intense shivering separated by quiescent periods. Isoflurane significantly increased the gain of shivering (as calculated from the initial increase), from -684 +/- 266 to -1483 +/- 752 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] [degree sign] Celsius sup -1. However, isoflurane significantly decreased the maximum intensity of shivering, from 706 +/- 144 to 489 +/- 80 ml/min. Relative electromyographic power in frequencies associated with clonus increased significantly when the volunteers were given isoflurane.     

Nefopam, a nonsedative benzoxazocine analgesic, selectively reduces the shivering threshold in unanesthetized subjects

BACKGROUND: The analgesic nefopam does not compromise ventilation, is minimally sedating, and is effective as a treatment for postoperative shivering. The authors evaluated the effects of nefopam on the major thermoregulatory responses in humans: sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering. METHODS: Nine volunteers were studied on three randomly assigned days: (1) control (saline), (2) nefopam at a target plasma concentration of 35 ng/ml (low dose), and (3) nefopam at a target concentration of 70 ng/ml (high dose, approximately 20 mg total). Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased to provoke sweating and then reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. The authors determined the thresholds (triggering core temperature at a designated skin temperature of 34 degrees C) by mathematically compensating for changes in skin temperature using the established linear cutaneous contributions to control of each response. RESULTS: Nefopam did not significantly modify the slopes for sweating (0.0 +/- 4.9 degrees C. microg-1. ml; r2 = 0.73 +/- 0.32) or vasoconstriction (-3.6 +/- 5.0 degrees C. microg-1. ml; r2 = -0.47 +/- 0.41). In contrast, nefopam significantly reduced the slope of shivering (-16.8 +/- 9.3 degrees C. microg-1. ml; r2 = 0.92 +/- 0.06). Therefore, high-dose nefopam reduced the shivering threshold by 0.9 +/- 0.4 degrees C (P < 0.001) without any discernible effect on the sweating or vasoconstriction thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Most drugs with thermoregulatory actions-including anesthetics, sedatives, and opioids-synchronously reduce the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. However, nefopam reduced only the shivering threshold. This pattern has not previously been reported for a centrally acting drug. That pharmacologic modulations of vasoconstriction and shivering can be separated is of clinical and physiologic interest.     

Hypothermic Modulation of Cerebral Ischemic Injury during Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Pigs

Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether progressive levels of hypothermia (37, 34, 31, or 28 [degree sign] Celsius) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in pigs reduce the physiologic and metabolic consequences of global cerebral ischemia.

Methods: Sagittal sinus and cortical microdialysis catheters were inserted into anesthetized pigs. Animals were placed on CPB and randomly assigned to 37 [degree sign] Celsius (n = 10), 34 [degree sign] Celsius (n = 10), 31 [degree sign] Celsius (n = 11), or 28 [degree sign] Celsius (n = 10) management. Next 20 min of global cerebral ischemia was produced by temporarily ligating the innominate and left subclavian arteries, followed by reperfusion, rewarming, and termination of CPB. Cerebral oxygen metabolism (CMRO2) was calculated by cerebral blood flow (radioactive microspheres) and arteriovenous oxygen content gradient. Cortical excitatory amino acids (EAA) by microdialysis were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. Electroencephalographic (EEG) signals were graded by observers blinded to the protocol. After CPB, cerebrospinal fluid was sampled to test for S-100 protein and the cerebral cortex was biopsied.

Results: Cerebral oxygen metabolism increased after rewarming from 28 [degree sign] Celsius, 31 [degree sign] Celsius, and 34 [degree sign] Celsius CPB but not in the 37 [degree sign] animals; CMRO2, remained lower with 37 [degree sign] Celsius (1.8 +/- 0.2 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] 100 g sup -1) than with 28 [degree sign] Celsius (3.1 +/- 0.1 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] 100 g sup -1; P < 0.05). The EEG scores after CPB were depressed in all groups and remained significantly lower in the 37 [degree sign] Celsius animals. With 28 [degree sign] Celsius and 31 [degree sign] Celsius CPB, EAA concentrations did not change. In contrast, glutamate increased by sixfold during ischemia at 37 [degree sign] Celsius and remained significantly greater during reperfusion in the 34 [degree sign] Celsius and 37 [degree sign] Celsius groups. Cortical biopsy specimens showed no intergroup differences in energy metabolites except two to three times greater brain lactate in the 37 [degree sign] Celsius animals. S-100 protein in cerebrospinal fluid was greater in the 37 [degree sign] Celsius (6 +/- 0.9 micro gram/l) and 34 [degree sign] Celsius (3.5 +/- 0.5 micro gram/l) groups than the 31 [degree sign] Celsius (1.9 +/- 0.1 micro gram/l) and 28 [degree sign] Celsius (1.7 +/- 0.2 micro gram/l) animals.     

The Effects of Meperidine and Sufentanil on the Shivering Threshold in Postoperative Patients

Background: Meperidine (pethidine) reportedly treats postoperative shivering better than equianalgesic doses of other [micro sign]-receptor agonists. The authors' first goal was to develop a method to accurately determine postoperative shivering threshold, and then to determine the extent to which meperidine and sufentanil inhibit postoperative shivering.

Methods: A computer-controlled infusion was started before operation in 30 patients, with target plasma concentrations of 0.15, 0.30, or 0.60 [micro sign]g/ml meperidine or 0.1, 0.15, or 0.2 ng/ml sufentanil targeted; patients were randomly assigned to each drug and concentration. The infusion was continued throughout surgery and recovery. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Core temperatures were [almost equal to] 34 [degree sign]C by the end of surgery. The compensated core temperature at which visible shivering and a 20% decrease in steady-state oxygen consumption was recorded identified the shivering threshold. A blood sample for opioid concentration was obtained from each patient at this time. The ability of each opioid to reduce the shivering threshold was evaluated using linear regression.

Results: End-tidal isoflurane concentrations were <0.2% in each group at the time of extubation, and shivering occurred [almost equal to] 1 h later. Meperidine linearly decreased the shivering threshold: threshold ([degree sign]C) = -2.8 [middle dot] [meperidine ([micro sign]g/ml)] + 36.2; r2 = 0.64, P = 0.0005. Sufentanil also linearly decreased the shivering threshold: threshold ([degree sign]C) = -7.8 [middle dot] [sufentanil (ng/ml)] + 36.9; r (2) = 0.46, P = 0.02.     

Meperidine and Alfentanil Do Not Reduce the Gain or Maximum Intensity of Shivering

Background: Thermoregulatory shivering can be characterized by its threshold (triggering core temperature), gain (incremental intensity increase with further core temperature deviation), and maximum intensity. Meperidine (a combined micro- and kappa-agonist) treats shivering better than equianalgesic doses of pure micro-opioid agonists. Meperidine's special antishivering action is mediated, at least in part, by a disproportionate decrease in the shivering threshold. That is, meperidine decreases the shivering threshold twice as much as the vasoconstriction threshold, whereas alfentanil (a pure micro-agonist) decreases the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds comparably. However, reductions in the gain or maximum shivering intensity might also contribute to the clinical efficacy of meperidine. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that meperidine reduces the gain and maximum intensity of shivering much more than alfentanil does.

Methods: Ten volunteers were each studied on three separate days: (1) control (no drug); (2) a target total plasma meperidine concentration of 1.2 micro gram/ml; and (3) a target plasma alfentanil concentration of 0.2 micro gram/ml. Skin temperatures were maintained near 31 [degree sign] Celsius, and core temperatures were decreased by central-venous infusion of cold lactated Ringer's solution until maximum shivering intensity was observed. Shivering was evaluated using oxygen consumption and electromyography. A sustained increase in oxygen consumption identified the shivering threshold. The gain of shivering was calculated as the slope of the oxygen consumption versus core temperature regression, and as the slope of electromyographic intensity versus core temperature regression.

Results: Meperidine and alfentanil administration significantly decreased the shivering thresholds. However, neither meperidine nor alfentanil reduced the gain of shivering, as determined by either oxygen consumption or electromyography. Opioid administration also failed to significantly decrease the maximum intensity of shivering.     

Doxapram only slightly reduces the shivering threshold in healthy volunteers

We determined the effects of doxapram on the major autonomic thermoregulatory responses in humans. Nine healthy volunteers were studied on 2 days: control and doxapram (IV infusion to a plasma concentration of 2.4 +/- 0.8, 2.5 +/- 0.9, and 2.6 +/- 1.1 microg/mL at the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds, respectively). Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased to provoke sweating, then reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. We determined the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds with compensation for changes in skin temperature. Data were analyzed with paired t-tests and presented as mean +/- sd; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Doxapram did not change the sweating (control: 37.5 degrees +/- 0.4 degrees C, doxapram: 37.3 degrees +/- 0.4 degrees C; P = 0.290) or the vasoconstriction threshold (36.8 degrees +/- 0.7 degrees C versus 36.4 degrees +/- 0.5 degrees C; P = 0.110). However, it significantly reduced the shivering threshold from 36.2 degrees +/- 0.5 degrees C to 35.7 degrees +/- 0.7 degrees C (P = 0.012). No sedation or symptoms of panic were observed on either study day. The observed reduction in the shivering threshold explains the drug's efficacy for treatment of postoperative shivering; however, a reduction of only 0.5 degrees C is unlikely to markedly facilitate induction of therapeutic hypothermia as a sole drug.     

Desflurane Reduces the Febrile Response to Administration of Interleukin-2

Background: Intraoperative fever is relatively rare considering how often pyrogenic causes are likely to be present and how common fever is postoperatively. This low incidence suggests that general anesthesia per se inhibits the normal response to pyrogenic stimulation. The authors therefore tested the hypothesis that desflurane-induced anesthesia produces a dose-dependent inhibition of the febrile response.

Methods: Eight volunteers were studied, each on 3 study days. Each was given an intravenous injection of 50,000 IU/kg of interleukin-2 (elapsed time, 0 h), followed 2 h later by 100,000 IU/kg. One hour after the second dose, the volunteers were assigned randomly to three doses of desflurane to induce anesthesia: (1) 0.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC; control), (2) 0.6 MAC, and (3) 1.0 MAC. Anesthesia continued for 5 h. Core temperatures were recorded from the tympanic membrane. Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction was evaluated using forearm-minus-fingertip skin temperature gradients; shivering was evaluated with electromyography. Integrated and peak temperatures during anesthesia were compared with repeated-measures analysis of variance and Scheffe's F tests.

Results: Values are presented as mean +/- SD. Desflurane reduced the integrated (area under the curve) febrile response to pyrogen, from 7.7 +/- 2.0 [degree sign]C [center dot] h on the control day to 2.1 +/- 2.3 [degree sign]C [center dot] h during 0.6 MAC and to -1.4 +/- 3.1 [degree sign]C [center dot] h during 1.0 MAC desflurane-induced anesthesia. Peak core temperature (elapsed time, 5-8 h) decreased in a dose-dependent fashion: 38.6 +/- 0.5 [degree sign]C on the control day, 37.7 +/- 0.7 [degree sign]C during 0.6 MAC and 37.2 +/- 1.0 [degree sign]C during 1.0 MAC desflurane anesthesia. Rising core temperature was always associated with fingertip vasoconstriction and often with shivering.     

Neither nalbuphine nor atropine possess special antishivering activity

The special antishivering action of meperidine may be mediated by its kappa or anticholinergic actions. We therefore tested the hypotheses that nalbuphine or atropine decreases the shivering threshold more than the vasoconstriction threshold. Eight volunteers were each evaluated on four separate study days: 1) control (no drug), 2) small-dose nalbuphine (0.2 microg/mL), 3) large-dose nalbuphine (0.4 microg/mL), and 4) atropine (1-mg bolus and 0.5 mg/h). Body temperature was increased until the patient sweated and then decreased until the patient shivered. Nalbuphine produced concentration-dependent decreases (mean +/- SD) in the sweating (-2.5 +/- 1.7 degrees C. microg(-1). mL; r(2) = 0.75 +/- 0.25), vasoconstriction (-2.6 +/- 1.7 degrees C. microg(-1). mL; r(2) = 0.75 +/- 0.25), and shivering (-2.8 +/- 1.7 degrees C. microg(-1). mL; r(2) = 0.79 +/- 0.23) thresholds. Atropine significantly increased the thresholds for sweating (1.0 degrees C +/- 0.4 degrees C), vasoconstriction (0.9 degrees C +/- 0.3 degrees C), and shivering (0.7 degrees C +/- 0.3 degrees C). Nalbuphine reduced the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds comparably. This differs markedly from meperidine, which impairs shivering twice as much as vasoconstriction. Atropine increased all thresholds and would thus be expected to facilitate shivering. Our results thus fail to support the theory that activation of kappa-opioid or central anticholinergic receptors contribute to meperidine's special antishivering action.     

Relative Contribution of Skin and Core Temperatures to Vasoconstriction and Shivering Thresholds during Isoflurane Anesthesia

Background: Thermoregulatory control is based on both skin and core temperatures. Skin temperature contributes [approximate] 20% to control of vasoconstriction and shivering in unanesthetized humans. However, this value has been used to arithmetically compensate for the cutaneous contribution to thermoregulatory control during anesthesia-although there was little basis for assuming that the relation was unchanged by anesthesia. It even remains unknown whether the relation between skin and core temperatures remains linear during anesthesia. We therefore tested the hypothesis that mean skin temperature contributes [approximate] 20% to control of vasoconstriction and shivering, and that the contribution is linear during general anesthesia.

Methods: Eight healthy male volunteers each participated on 3 separate days. On each day, they were anesthetized with 0.6 minimum alveolar concentrations of isoflurane. They then were assigned in random order to a mean skin temperature of 29, 31.5, or 34 [degree sign]C. Their cores were subsequently cooled by central-venous administration of fluid at [almost equal to] 3 [degree sign]C until vasoconstriction and shivering were detected. The relation between skin and core temperatures at the threshold for each response in each volunteer was determined by linear regression. The proportionality constant was then determined from the slope of this regression. These values were compared with those reported previously in similar but unanesthetized subjects.

Results: There was a linear relation between mean skin and core temperatures at the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds in each volunteer: r2 = 0.98 +/- 0.02 for vasoconstriction, and 0.96 +/- 0.04 for shivering. The cutaneous contribution to thermoregulatory control, however, differed among the volunteers and was not necessarily the same for vasoconstriction and shivering in individual subjects. Overall, skin temperature contributed 21 +/- 8% to vasoconstriction, and 18 +/- 10% to shivering. These values did not differ significantly from those identified previously in unanesthetized volunteers: 20 +/- 6% and 19 +/- 8%, respectively.     

Autonomic Nervous System Responses during Sedative Infusions of Dexmedetomidine

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of dexmedetomidine on systemic and cardiac autonomic reflex responses during rest and during thermal stress.

Methods: Volunteers received either placebo or low- or high-dose dexmedetomidine (target plasma concentrations 0.3 or 0.6 ng/ml, respectively) infusions in a prospectively randomized, double-blinded crossover study design. After 1 h, baroreflex sensitivity was assessed, and then core body temperature was raised to the sweating threshold and then lowered to the shivering threshold. Plasma catecholamines and blood pressure were measured, and cardiac autonomic responses were assessed by analysis of heart rate variability.

Results: Compared with placebo, plasma norepinephrine concentrations, blood pressure, heart rate, and some heart rate variability measures were lower after 1-h infusion of dexmedetomidine, but baroreflex responses did not differ significantly. Dexmedetomidine blunted the systemic and cardiac sympathetic effects of sweating observed during placebo infusion but had no effect on parasympathetic measures. Increases in blood pressure, and systemic catecholamines due to shivering were observed during placebo and dexmedetomidine, but these responses were less with dexmedetomidine. During shivering, dexmedetomidine infusion was associated with higher low-frequency and high-frequency heart rate variability power but lower heart rate compared with the sweating threshold and with the control period, suggesting nonreciprocal cardiac autonomic responses.     

Autonomic nervous system responses during sedative infusions of dexmedetomidine

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of dexmedetomidine on systemic and cardiac autonomic reflex responses during rest and during thermal stress. METHODS: Volunteers received either placebo or low- or high-dose dexmedetomidine (target plasma concentrations 0.3 or 0.6 ng/ml, respectively) infusions in a prospectively randomized, double-blinded crossover study design. After 1 h, baroreflex sensitivity was assessed, and then core body temperature was raised to the sweating threshold and then lowered to the shivering threshold. Plasma catecholamines and blood pressure were measured, and cardiac autonomic responses were assessed by analysis of heart rate variability. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, plasma norepinephrine concentrations, blood pressure, heart rate, and some heart rate variability measures were lower after 1-h infusion of dexmedetomidine, but baroreflex responses did not differ significantly. Dexmedetomidine blunted the systemic and cardiac sympathetic effects of sweating observed during placebo infusion but had no effect on parasympathetic measures. Increases in blood pressure, and systemic catecholamines due to shivering were observed during placebo and dexmedetomidine, but these responses were less with dexmedetomidine. During shivering, dexmedetomidine infusion was associated with higher low-frequency and high-frequency heart rate variability power but lower heart rate compared with the sweating threshold and with the control period, suggesting nonreciprocal cardiac autonomic responses. CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of dexmedetomidine results in compensated reductions in systemic sympathetic tone without changes in baroreflex sensitivity. Dexmedetomidine blunts heart rate and the systemic sympathetic activation due to sweating, but it is less effective in blunting cardiac sympathetic responses to shivering. During dexmedetomidine infusion, cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic tone may have nonreciprocal changes during shivering.     

Lack of Nonshivering Thermogenesis in Infants Anesthetized with Fentanyl and Propofol

Background: Sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering have been observed during general anesthesia. Among these, vasoconstriction is especially important because-once triggered-it minimizes further hypothermia. Surprisingly, the core-temperature plateau associated with vasoconstriction appears to preserve core temperature better in infants and children than adults. This observation suggests that vasoconstriction in anesthetized infants may be accompanied by hypermetabolism. Consistent with this theory, unanesthetized infants rely on nonshivering thermogenesis to double heat production when vasoconstriction alone is insufficient. Accordingly, the authors tested the hypothesis that intraoperative core hypothermia triggers nonshivering thermogenesis in infants.

Methods: With Ethics Committee approval and written parental consent, the authors studied six infants undergoing abdominal surgery. All were aged 1 day to 9 months and weighed 2.4-9 kg. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol and fentanyl. The infants were mechanically ventilated and allowed to cool passively until core (distal esophageal) temperatures reached 34-34.5 degrees Celsius. Oxygen consumption-the authors' index of metabolic rate- was recorded throughout cooling. Because nonshivering thermogenesis triples circulating norepinephrine concentrations, arterial blood was analyzed for plasma catecholamines at [nearly equal] 0.5 degrees Celsius intervals. Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction was evaluated using forearm - fingertip, skin-surface gradients, with gradients exceeding 4 degrees Celsius, indicating intense vasoconstriction. The patients were subsequently rapidly rewarmed to 37 degrees Celsius. Regression analysis was used to correlate changes in oxygen consumption and plasma catecholamine concentrations with core temperature.

Results: All patients were vasoconstricted by the time core temperature reached 36 degrees Celsius. Further reduction in core temperature to 34-34.5 degrees Celsius did not increase oxygen consumption. Instead, oxygen consumption decreased linearly. Hypothermia also failed to increase plasma catecholamine concentrations.     

Sex-related Differences in the Influence of Morphine on Ventilatory Control in Humans

Background: Opiate agonists have different analgesic effects in male and female patients. The authors describe the influence of sex on the respiratory pharmacology of the micro-receptor agonist morphine.

Methods: The study was placebo-controlled, double-blind, and randomized. Steady-state ventilatory responses to carbon dioxide and responses to a step into hypoxia (duration, 3 min; oxygen saturation, [approximately] 82%; end-tidal carbon dioxide tension, 45 mmHg) were obtained before and during intravenous morphine or placebo administration (bolus dose of 100 micro gram/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 30 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] h sup -1) in 12 men and 12 women.

Results: In women, morphine reduced the slope of the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide from 1.8 +/- 0.9 to 1.3 +/- 0.7 l [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] mmHg sup -1 (mean +/- SD; P < 0.05), whereas in men there was no significant effect (control = 2.0 +/- 0.4 vs. morphine = 1.8 +/- 0.4 l [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] mmHg sup -1). Morphine had no effect on the apneic threshold in women (control = 33.8 +/- 3.8 vs. morphine = 35.3 +/- 5.3 mmHg), but caused an increase in men from 34.5 +/- 2.3 to 38.3 +/- 3 mmHg, P < 0.05). Morphine decreased hypoxic sensitivity in women from 1.0 +/- 0.5 l [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] % sup -1 to 0.5 +/- 0.4 l [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] % sup -1 (P < 0.05) but did not cause a decrease in men (control = 1.0 +/- 0.5 l [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] % sup -1 vs. morphine = 0.9 +/- 0.5 l [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot] % sup -1). Weight, lean body mass, body surface area, and calculated fat mass differed between the sexes, but their inclusion in the analysis as a covariate revealed no influence on the differences between men and women in morphine-induced changes.     

Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity, Cerebral Metabolic Rate, and Carbon Dioxide Response in Normal Humans

Background: Dexmedetomidine reduces cerebral blood flow (CBF) in humans and animals. In animal investigations, cerebral metabolic rate (CMR) was unchanged. Therefore, the authors hypothesized that dexmedetomidine would cause a decrease in the CBF/CMR ratio with even further reduction by superimposed hyperventilation. This reduction might be deleterious in patients with neurologic injuries.

Methods: Middle cerebral artery velocity (CBFV) was recorded continuously in six volunteers. CBFV, jugular bulb venous saturation (Sjvo2), CMR equivalent (CMRe), and CBFV/CMRe ratio were determined at six intervals before, during, and after administration of dexmedetomidine: (1) presedation; (2) presedation with hyperventilation; at steady state plasma levels of (3) 0.6 ng/ml and (4) 1.2 ng/ml; (5) 1.2 ng/ml with hyperventilation; and (6) 30 min after discontinuing dexmedetomidine. The slope of the arterial carbon dioxide tension (Paco2)-CBFV relation was determined presedation and at 1.2 ng/ml.

Results: CBFV and CMRe decreased in a dose-related manner. The CBFV/CMRe ratio was unchanged. The CBFV response to carbon dioxide decreased from 1.20 +/- 0.2 cm[middle dot]s-1[middle dot]mm Hg-1 presedation to 0.40 +/- 0.15 cm[middle dot]s-1[middle dot]mm Hg-1 at 1.2 ng/ml. Sjvo2 was statistically unchanged during hyperventilation at 1.2 ng/ml versus presedation (50 +/- 11 vs. 43 +/- 5%). Arousal for hyperventilation at 1.2 ng/ml resulted in increased CBFV (30 +/- 5 to 38 +/- 4) and Bispectral Index (43 +/- 10 to 94 +/- 3).     

Selective Pulmonary Vasodilation by Intravenous Infusion of an Ultrashort Half-life Nucleophile/Nitric Oxide Adduct

Background: PROLI/NO (C5 H7 N3 O4 Na2 [center dot] CH3 OH) is an ultrashort-acting nucleophile/NO adduct that generates NO (half-life 2 s at 37 [degree sign] Celsius and pH 7.4). Because of its short half-life, the authors hypothesized that intravenous administration of this compound would selectively dilate the pulmonary vasculature but cause little or no systemic hypotension.

Methods: In eight awake healthy sheep with pulmonary hypertension induced by 9,11-dideoxy-9 alpha,11 alpha-methanoepoxy prostaglandin F sub 2 alpha, the authors compared PROLI/NO with two reference drugs-inhaled NO, a well-studied selective pulmonary vasodilator, and intravenous sodium nitroprusside (SNP), a nonselective vasodilator. Sheep inhaled 10, 20, 40, and 80 parts per million NO or received intravenous infusions of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 of SNP or 0.75, 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 of PROLI/NO. The order of administration of the vasoactive drugs (NO, SNP, PROLI/NO) and their doses were randomized.

Results: Inhaled NO selectively dilated the pulmonary vasculature. Intravenous SNP induced nonselective vasodilation of the systemic and pulmonary circulation. Intravenous PROLI/NO selectively vasodilated the pulmonary circulation at doses up to 6 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1, which decreased pulmonary vascular resistance by 63% (P < 0.01) from pulmonary hypertensive baseline values without changing systemic vascular resistance. At 12 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1, PROLI/NO decreased systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance and pressure. Exhaled NO concentrations were higher during PROLI/NO infusion than during SNP infusion (P < 0.01 with all data pooled).     

Alterations in Canine Left Ventricular-arterial Coupling and Mechanical Efficiency Produced by Propofol

Background: Propofol reduces blood pressure by decreasing left ventricular (LV) afterload and myocardial contractility. This investigation tested the hypothesis that propofol preserves LV-arterial coupling and mechanical efficiency because of these simultaneous hemodynamic actions.

Methods: Experiments were conducted in open-chest dogs (n = 8) instrumented for measurement of aortic and LV pressure, dP/dtmax, and LV volume. Myocardial contractility was assessed with the slope (E sub es) of the LV end systolic pressure-volume relationship. Effective arterial elastance (Ea; the ratio of end systolic arterial pressure to stroke volume), stroke work (SW), and pressure-volume area (PVA) were determined from the LV pressure-volume relationships. Dogs were studied 30 min after instrumentation and after 15-min intravenous infusions of propofol at 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] h sup -1.

Results: Propofol caused dose-dependent decreases in Ees (4.7 +/- 0.9 during control to 2.7 +/- 0.5 mmHg/ml during the high dosage) and dP/dtmax, indicating a direct negative inotropic effect. Ea increased at the 10 mg [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] h sup -1 dose of propofol but decreased at higher dosages. Propofol decreased the ratio of Ees to Ea (0.88 +/- 0.13 during control to 0.56 +/- 0.10 during the high dosage), consistent with impairment of LV-arterial coupling. Propofol also reduced the ratio SW to PVA (0.54 +/- 0.03 during control to 0.45 +/- 0.03 during the 20 mg [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] h sup -1), suggesting a decline in LV mechanical efficiency. SW and PVA recovered toward baseline values at the 40 mg [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] h sup -1 dose.