Colonic and Anorectal Motility Testing in Clinical Practice

Colonic and anorectal motor activity can be evaluated by a variety of diagnostic techniques. These include anorectal and colonic manometry, radiographic and scintigraphic studies of defecation and continence, colonic transit using radioopaque markers or radioiso-topes, neurophysiological studies of pelvic floor striated muscles and pudendal nerves, and anal endosonography. This article reviews these techniques and assesses their value and limitations in evaluating patients with constipation, defecatory disorders, and fecal incontinence.     

Defecation disorders. Characteristics of manometric studies and rehabilitation

The authors review the literature and their personal experience about the systematic exploration of defecation disorders by anorectal manometry and colpocystodefecography. They stress the importance of combining functional and morphological evaluation, in order to avoid inappropriate surgery. Concerning anorectal manometry, the determination of the smallest volume of rectal distention inducing a complete relaxation of the internal anal sphincter was found more useful than the maximal tolerable volume in the exploration of defecation disorders. Finally, the authors report the results of biofeedback conditioning prescribed in 30 patients (27 women, 3 men, mean age: 55 years) with defecation disorders (terminal constipation in 21, fecal incontinence in 9 patients). Several characteristics of anorectal manometry and of defecography were significantly improved after biofeedback conditioning.     

Radiopaque markers transit and anorectal manometry in 16 patients with multiple sclerosis and urinary bladder dysfunction

Fecal incontinence and/or constipation are frequent complaints in multiple sclerosis associated with urinary bladder dysfunction, incontinence, and/or retention. Total and segmental colonic transit were studied by determination of radiopaque markers, and anorectal function by anorectal manometry, in 16 multiple sclerosis patients clinically defined (with urinary bladder dysfunction shown by urodynamic examination). Fifteen multiple sclerosis patients had constipation and 14 had increased colonic transit time; ten multiple sclerosis patients had fecal incontinence and five had spontaneous rectal contractions. It is suggested that increased colonic transit and anorectal dysfunction were secondary to neurologic disorders just as urinary bladder dysfunction is due to neurologic disorders in multiple sclerosis.     

Discriminative Value of Anorectal Manometry in Clinical Practice

Guidelines recommend anorectal manometry in patients with fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. However, limited evidence supports the utility of manometric testing. We retrospectively reviewed tracings obtained between November 2005 and May 2008. A total of 298 patients (86% women; average age 52 years) were included. The main indications were incontinence (51%) and constipation (42%). Patients suffering from incontinence were older and had lower resting and squeeze pressure compared to continent patients. However, the discriminative power of manometric pressure data was poor, with low sensitivity and specificity. An abnormal straining pattern suggesting dyssynergic defecation was seen in 43% of constipated patients compared to 13% of patients with fecal incontinence. A concordance between manometric patterns and the balloon expulsion test was seen in 72%. The low sensitivity and specificity of manometric parameters does not support the routine use of anorectal manometry in patients with defecation disorders.     

Constipation of anorectal outlet obstruction: pathophysiology, evaluation and management

Constipation is a subjective symptom of various pathological conditions. Incidence of constipation fluctuates from 2 to 30% in the general population. Approximately 50% of constipated patients referred to tertiary care centers have obstructed defecation constipation. Constipation of obstructed defecation may be due to mechanical causes or functional disorders of the anorectal region. Mechanical causes are related to morphological abnormalities of the anorectum (megarectum, rectal prolapse, rectocele, enterocele, neoplasms, stenosis). Functional disorders are associated with neurological disorders and dysfunction of the pelvic floor muscles or anorectal muscles (anismus, descending perineum syndrome, Hirschsprung's disease). However, this type of constipation should be differentiated by colonic slow transit constipation which, if coexists, should be managed to a second time. Assessment of patients with severe constipation includes a good history, physical examination and specialized investigations (colonic transit time, anorectal manometry, rectal balloon expulsion test, defecography, electromyography), which contribute to the diagnosis and the differential diagnosis of the cause of the obstructed defecation. Thereby, constipated patients can be given appropriate treatment for their problem, which may be conservative (bulk agents, high-fiber diet or laxatives), biofeedback training or surgery.     

Function and dysfunction of the colon and anorectum in adults: Working team report of the Swedish Motility Group (SMoG)

Symptoms of fecal incontinence and constipation are common in the general population. These can, however, be unreliably reported and are poorly discriminatory for underlying pathophysiology. Furthermore, both symptoms may coexist. In the elderly, fecal impaction always must be excluded. For patients with constipation, colon transit studies, anorectal manometry and defecography may help to identify patients with slow-transit constipation and/or pelvic floor dysfunction. The best documented medical treatments for constipation are the macrogols, lactulose and isphagula. Evolving drugs include lubiprostone, which enhances colonic secretion by activating chloride channels. Surgery is restricted for a highly selected group of patients with severe slow-transit constipation and for those with large rectoceles that demonstrably cause rectal evacuatory impairment. For patients with fecal incontinence that does not resolve on antidiarrheal treatment, functional and structural evaluation with anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound or magnetic resonance (MR) of the anal canal may help to guide management. Sacral nerve stimulation is a rapidly evolving alternative when other treatments such as biofeedback and direct sphincter repair have failed. Advances in understanding the pathophysiology as a guide to treatment of patients with constipation and fecal incontinence is a continuing important goal for translational research. The content of this article is a summary of presentations given by the authors at the Fourth Meeting of the Swedish Motility Group, held in Gothenburg in April 2007.     

Functional anorectal disorders

This report defines criteria for diagnosing functional anorectal disorders (ie, fecal incontinence, anorectal pain, and disorders of defecation). Functional fecal incontinence is defined as the uncontrolled passage of fecal material recurring for > or =3 months in an individual with a developmental age of > or =4 years that is associated with: (1) abnormal functioning of normally innervated and structurally intact muscles, and/or (2) no or minor abnormalities of sphincter structure and/or innervation insufficient to explain fecal incontinence, and/or (3) normal or disordered bowel habits (ie, fecal retention or diarrhea), and/or (4) psychological causes. However, conditions wherein structural and/or neurogenic abnormalities explain the symptom, or are part of a generalized process (eg, diabetic neuropathy) are not included within functional fecal incontinence. Functional fecal incontinence is a common, but underrecognized symptom, which is equally prevalent in men and women, and can often cause considerable distress. The clinical features are useful for guiding diagnostic testing and therapy. Functional anorectal pain syndromes include proctalgia fugax (fleeting pain) and chronic proctalgia; chronic proctalgia may be subdivided into levator ani syndrome and unspecified anorectal pain, which are defined by arbitrary clinical criteria. Functional defecation disorders are characterized by 2 or more symptoms of constipation, with > or =2 of the following features during defecation: impaired evacuation, inappropriate contraction of the pelvic floor muscles, and inadequate propulsive forces. Functional disorders of defecation may be amenable to pelvic floor retraining by biofeedback therapy (such as dyssynergic defecation).     

Study on functional constipation and constipation‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome by using the colonic transit test and anorectal manometry

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the visceral perception, anorectal pressure and colonic transit time (CTT) in patients with functional constipation and constipation‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome (C‐IBS), and to study the manometric abnormalities of these two conditions. METHODS: The CTT in patients with functional constipation and C‐IBS was studied by using radiopaque markers. Rectal visceral perception thresholds, rectal compliance and anorectal pressure were examined by electric barostat. RESULTS: The CTT in both groups of constipated patients was abnormal. A lot of radiopaque markers remained in the right colon in C‐IBS patients, whereas in patients with functional constipation, the radiopaque markers remained in each segment of the colon. The anorectal resting pressure, squeezing pressure and relaxation pressure were normal in both groups. Rectal compliance and defecation thresholds were much higher compared with controls, and the rectal visceral perception of functional constipation was also abnormal. CONCLUSIONS: The motility abnormalities of functional constipation and C‐IBS occurred in different colonic segments. Results suggest that CTT measure­ment and anorectal manometry could be helpful in the differential diagnosis of these two conditions.     

Role of manometry, defecography and anal endosonography in the evaluation of colorectal disorders.

OBJECTIVE: altered motility or anatomy of the rectum, anus and perineal floor may lead to symptoms which are unresponsive to routine therapeutic approaches. These disturbances usually lead to constipation, fecal incontinence, or both. Different tests and techniques for evaluating anorectal and perineal disorders, developed in the last two decades, make a better understanding of these disorders possible. This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic benefits of combining manometry, defecography and anal endosonography in the assessment of patients with anorectal disorders. METHODS: twenty-five children with constipation (with or without soiling), incontinence and/or prolapse underwent anal manometry, defecography and anal endosonography. Group A consisted of 9 children with fecal incontinence, group B consisted of 10 children with constipation with soiling, and group C comprised 6 children with constipation without soiling. RESULTS: in group A resting incontinence was associated with a hypotonic external sphincter in 4 out of 9 patients, 2 of whom had internal anal sphincter thinning. In group B resting incontinence was associated with a hypotonic external sphincter in 8 out of 10 patients, 6 of whom had internal anal sphincter thinning. In group C these associations were not seen in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: barium enema is not sufficient for an accurate diagnosis of anorectal disorders. No single test is capable of revealing the type of disease. Anal manometry, defecography and endosonography are complementary procedures in the assessment of this group of disorders. This new approach will improve our knowledge of the pathogenesis of these disorders in children. However, further studies are needed to obtain conclusive evidence.     

Barostat testing in children with functional gastrointestinal disorders

Children and adolescents with chronic defecation disorders and chronic abdominal pain without obvious organic etiology form a challenging group of patients for pediatric health-care professionals. The pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying such functional gastroenterology disorders are poorly understood. Research studies on the use of the barostat have been aimed to increase our knowledge in this area. Barostat testing allows defining visceral hyper- or hyposensitivity, contractility, and compliance of the gut. This review focuses on rectal barostat studies performed in children with abdominal pain, constipation, and fecal incontinence.     

Biofeedback training in disordered defecation

Summary For 20 years now, biofeedback applications in the treatment of fecal incontinence and, more recently, chronic constipation in adults have proven that improvement of anorectal function can be achieved in a majority of patients. Despite this evidence, the definitive mode of action of biofeedback training remains obscure but may include improvement of both motor and sensory functions of the anorectum. In addition, behavioral modification of individual defecatory behavior in these patients may be effective as well. The long-term results of such treatment need to be tested in future research (64).Supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, En 50/10.     

Neurophysiologic assessment of the anal sphincters

One hundred twenty consecutive patients with either fecal incontinence (60 patients), chronic constipation (41 patients), or idiopathic intractable pelvic pain (19 patients) were prospectively assessed. Patients underwent concentric needle electromyography (EMG), bilateral pudendal nerve terminal motor latency evaluation, anorectal manometry, and cinedefecography. The most common EMG finding in patients with fecal incontinence was decreased recruitment of motor units with squeezing and polyphasic motor unit potentials; these are consistent with an injury pattern. The most common EMG finding in the constipated patients was paradoxical puborectalis contraction. This latter abnormality was also a frequent finding in patients with rectal pain, as was prolongation of pudendal nerve latency. Paradoxical puborectalis contraction was diagnosed more frequently with EMG than with cinedefecography. Inter-examination correlation was best in the incontinent group between EMG and manometry. Cinedefecography had poor correlation with EMG in all patient groups but was valuable in the detection of additional pathology such as rectoanal intussusception and anterior rectocele. Electromyography including pudendal nerve terminal motor latency assessment is a valuable adjunct in the evaluation of disorders of evacuation. The information it yields is complementary to that offered by more routine physiologic examinations.     

Defecation disorders: An important subgroup of functional constipation, its pathophysiology, evaluation and treatment with biofeedback.

Functional defecation disorders are common and affect approximately 50% of patients with chronic constipation. The etiology of functional defecation disorders is not well known, but several pathophysiologic mechanisms have been described, including failure of rectoanal coordination, paradoxical anal contraction or insufficient relaxation of anal sphincter during defecation and impairment of rectal sensation as well as secondary slowing of colonic transit. Symptoms alone are inadequate to distinguish patients with defecation disorders from those with other types of constipation. Detailed clinical evaluation and anorectal physiologic tests are required for definitive diagnosis. There is also a pathophysiological association between functional defecation disorders and other anorectal conditions such as solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Among the various treatment modalities, biofeedback therapy has emerged as an effective and specific treatment method for functional defecation disorders. The main goals of biofeedback therapy are to relax the pelvic floor and anal sphincter muscles during defecation and to improve rectoanal coordination and sensory perception. Today, it is possible to diagnose most functional disorders of defecation and either effectively treat or ameliorate symptoms in a majority of these patients.     

老年慢性功能性便秘患者结肠和肛管直肠动力学的改变

目的 探讨功能性便秘患者结肠和肛管直肠动力学改变及其对便秘分型、临床治疗的指导意义.方法 对我院42例老年功能性便秘患者(CFC)及20例健康对照者,采用不透X线标记物法测定结肠通过时间(CTT),同时应用8通道水灌注式下消化道压力检测系统进行直肠、肛管动力学测定.结果 (1)老年CFC组全结肠通过时间及乙状结肠通过时间分别为(49.0±16.4)h和(20.1±13.5)h,较对照组(25.2±7.7)h和(7.8±4.1)h明显延长(t=6.16和t=3.97,均P<0.05);(2)老年CFC患者模拟排便时肛管压力为(39.6±15.7)mmHg,对照组为(17.6±9.3)mmHg,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=5.79,P<0.05),老年CFC组13例患者模拟排便时出现肛管压力反常升高;老年CFC组直肠初始感觉阈和最大耐受容量分别为(49.2±10.5)ml和(175.2±52.6)ml,高于对照组的(33.6±8.5)ml和(123.4±39.1)ml,差异均有统计学意义(t=5.79和t=3.91,均P<0.05);直肠肛门抑制反射松弛率两组分别为59.5%和85.0%(x2=4.03,P相似文献   

The role and technique of ambulatory anal manometry.

Static anal manometry has proved itself a reliable, reproducible and objective assessment of sphincter function in the investigation of disorders of defecation and continence. Despite this, it gives only very limited information on sphincter function due to the unphysiological nature of its measurement. Technical advances, particularly in digital data storage, have made the recording of anal pressure in a normal environment for prolonged periods of time possible. This offers an improved understanding both of anal activity and the interaction of rectal and anal function in normal and pathological states. In normal subjects anal function during a number of normal physiological events such as micturition, passage of flatus and sleep have been investigated. The sampling reflex has been further defined. Abnormalities of the sampling reflex, rectal activity and slow wave activity in the anal sphincter have been demonstrated in a number of pathological conditions of the anorectum and in the states of incontinence or constipation. Effective ambulatory anal manometry remains in its infancy. With continuing advances it offers exciting possibilities in defining normal or abnormal activity of the anorectum and in the investigation of patients with disorders of defecation and continence.     

Defecation 2: Internal anorectal resistance is a critical factor in defecatory disorders

Background

The aim of this study was to test our hypothesis that the reason why imaging is of little assistance in diagnosing “constipation” causes may be related to the high sensitivity of internal anorectal flow resistance in defecation to small changes in geometry. We applied a mathematical model to describe the effects on flow mechanics of observed changes in the shape of the rectum and anus during defecation.

Methods

Three groups of patients were studied with video proctograms. Group 1 comprised 4 patients with normal defecation studied with video proctography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Group 2 comprised 8 patients with fecal incontinence, studied by video X-ray electromyography. Group 3 comprised 8 patients with constipation evaluated by video MRI.

Results

Three muscle vectors open the anorectal angle prior to defecation, causing the anorectal luminal diameter to increase to approximately twice its resting size. These vectors are forwards (anterior wall), backwards and downwards (posterior wall). Resistance to passage of a fecal bolus through the anorectum is determined by viscous friction against the anorectal wall and by the energy required to deform the bolus as it flows. The observed changes in anorectal geometry serve to reduce both the viscous friction in the anus and the deformation of the bolus, which reduces the force required to facilitate its passage through the anus. For example, if the effective diameter of the anus is doubled during defecation, the frictional resistance is reduced by a factor of 8.

Conclusions

The sensitivity of flow resistance to geometry explains why MRI or computed tomography (CT) scans taken during defecation are not often helpful in diagnosing causation. Small changes in geometry can have a disproportionate affect on flow resistance. Combining accurate directional measurements during dynamic MRI or CT scans taken during defecation with observations of bolus deformation, and if possible, simultaneous anorectal manometry, may provide clinically helpful insights on patients with anorectal evacuation disorders.     

便秘症状与肛门直肠测压和结肠传输试验结果的相关性研究:166例临床分析

背景:便秘是最常见的消化系统问题之一,有观点认为不同便秘症状或症状群对慢性便秘的病理生理机制可能有一定提示作用。肛门直肠测压是研究便秘病理生理机制的重要手段。目的:探讨便秘症状与肛门直肠测压和结肠传输试验结果之间的相关性。方法:连续纳入166例功能性便秘患者,行肛门直肠测压和结肠传输试验,并记录其排便次数减少、粪便干结、排便费力、排便不尽感、肛门梗阻感和腹胀症状发生情况。分析上述症状与两项检测结果的相关性。结果:腹胀组直肠最小感觉阈值降低发生率、排便次数减少组和排便费力组直肠推进力不足发生率均显著高于相应症状阴性组(P0.05),直肠肛门抑制反射不良组排便费力发生率显著低于反射正常组(P0.05);结肠慢传输以及肛门括约肌松弛不良、直肠肛门矛盾运动均与便秘症状无关。结论:排便次数减少和排便费力对直肠推进力不足有提示作用,腹胀则与直肠感觉过敏有关。深入细化便秘症状并综合考虑影响粪便性状的因素可能对慢性便秘的病理生理分型具有更好的提示作用。     

Anorectal dysfunction in patients with urologic disturbance due to multiple sclerosis

Anorectal function was evaluated in 11 patients with voiding dysfunction due to multiple sclerosis. In six patients with constipation, three also had symptoms of obstructed defecation and one patient was incontinent due to stercoral diarrhea. One patient was only fecal incontinent and one patient had obstructed defecation as the only symptom. Three patients had no anorectal symptoms. Anal manometry in the women compared with a control group revealed significant lower anal resting and squeeze pressures, although no significant difference of rectal sensation to distention with air was found. Pudendal nerve terminal latencies were obtained in seven patients and were all normal. In four patients latency could not be demonstrated due to poor contraction of the sphincter on stimulation of the pudendal nerve. Two of these patients were incontinent and two had both constipation and obstructed defecation. It is concluded that patients with voiding symptoms due to multiple sclerosis often reveal anorectal symptoms or motility disorders. Although anal sphincter function is reduced, fecal incontinence is not prevalent in this group. The reason for this lies probably in the fact that many of the patients are constipated, thus securing fecal continence.     

Difficult defecation: difficult problem assessment and management; what really helps?

Difficult defecation is a common and perhaps underrecognized cause of chronic constipation. While the history and a careful digital rectal examination are very useful for diagnosing defecatory disorders, the diagnosis needs to be confirmed by anorectal tests. Anorectal manometry and a rectal balloon expulsion test generally suffice to diagnose defecatory disorders; barium or MR defecography may necessary in selected cases. Colonic transit is normal or slow in patients with defecatory disorders. Pelvic floor retraining by biofeedback therapy is superior to laxatives for managing defecatory disorders.     

Lack of correlation of anorectal manometry with symptoms of chronic childhood constipation and encopresis

Chronic constipation is an extremely common problem in children. Many authors have advocated using anorectal manometric examination during evaluation of chronic childhood constipation and encopresis as a means of developing individualized modes of treatment. PURPOSE: This study was designed to prospectively examine frequency and severity of symptoms of childhood constipation and encopresis and associate these symptoms with anorectal manometric findings. METHODS: Forty-four children with chronic constipation participated in the study. Before performing anorectal manometry, bowel-related symptoms were collected for two consecutive weeks with a computerized voice mail system. Anorectal manometry was performed using a triple lumen catheter attached to a hydraulic manometry infusion system. RESULTS: Frequency of voluntary bowel movements did not correlate with any manometric parameters. Frequency of fecal soiling, age at onset of symptoms, and duration of symptoms were all highly correlated with degree of sphincter spasm during attempted defecation; however, none of these variables correlated with any other manometric parameter. Amount of pain associated with bowel movements correlated with frequency of soiling and was inversely correlated with maximum squeeze pressure but was not correlated with any other manometric parameter. CONCLUSIONS: In children with chronic constipation and encopresis, sphincter spasm demonstrated with anorectal manometry is highly correlated with frequency of fecal soiling, age at onset, and duration of symptoms; however, none of the other commonly measured manometric parameters appear to correlate with symptoms of chronic childhood constipation and encopresis.Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant RO1 HD 28160.