Clinical and immunologic effects of a rush sublingual immunotherapy to Parietaria species: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The local (noninjection) routes of immunotherapy are presently regarded as viable therapeutic options for respiratory allergy, and their mechanisms of action are currently undergoing investigation. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the clinical efficacy of a preseasonal rush sublingual-swallow immunotherapy and its effects on allergic inflammation in patients with seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis caused by Parietaria species. METHODS: Thirty patients with Parietaria species-induced rhinoconjunctivitis (13 with mild intermittent asthma) were randomly assigned sublingual-swallow immunotherapy or placebo in a rush preseasonal course. We assessed the seasonal symptom-drug intake score by diary card and the inflammatory infiltration and the intercellular adhesion molecule 1 expression on nasal epithelium after specific allergenic challenge before and after treatment. RESULTS: The investigated immunotherapy was well tolerated, and no side effects were recorded. A significant reduction of the symptom score (P =.016) and drug intake score (P =. 008) after immunotherapy was observed only in the active group. A decrease of the cumulative score was observed also in the placebo group (P =.046), but the significance was clearly higher (P =.006) in the active group. In the active group a reduction of neutrophils (P =.001), eosinophils (P =.01), and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 expression (P =.04) after specific nasal challenge was also detected. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that this sublingual-swallow immunotherapy administered through a rush schedule is clinically effective and safe and that it decreases the immune-mediated inflammatory responses to the allergen.     

A double-blind placebo-controlled evaluation of sublingual immunotherapy with a standardized ragweed extract in patients with seasonal rhinitis. Evidence for a dose-response relationship

BACKGROUND: There is a growing consensus on the benefits of sublingual-swallow immunotherapy in the treatment of allergic diseases. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy with standardized ragweed pollen extract tablets, in patients with an allergic rhinitis. A total of 110 outpatients were randomized (immunotherapy [I]: 55; placebo [P]: 55), of whom 99 were analyzable for efficacy (I: 48; P: 51) and 106 analyzable for safety (I: 53; P: 53). After a 28-day progression phase, the patients received a maintenance treatment during 6.5 months. Efficacy variables included a global assessment of efficacy (patient/ investigator), symptoms and medication scores as well as the frequency of asthma attacks. RESULTS: In the active treatment group, 43 patients completed the study, versus 49 on placebo. During the whole period of pollination, the difference favoring immunotherapy was highly significant for the global assessment by the patient (p = 0.004) and by the investigator (p = 0.005). Adverse reactions were reported more often in the active treatment but mild or moderate, and they abated after dose adjustment. A subgroup analysis of those patients receiving the highest dose of immunotherapy (3 tablets 3 times a week) showed a highly significant response for rhinitis and conjunctivitis total scores by comparison to lower dosages. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy and strongly suggests a dose-response relationship.     

Specific immunotherapy has long-term preventive effect of seasonal and perennial asthma: 10-year follow-up on the PAT study

BACKGROUND: 3-year subcutaneous specific immunotherapy (SIT) in children with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis reduced the risk of developing asthma during treatment and 2 years after discontinuation of SIT (5-year follow-up) indicating long-term preventive effect of SIT. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the long-term clinical effect and the preventive effect of developing asthma 7-years after termination of SIT. METHODS: One hundred and forty-seven subjects, aged 16-25 years with grass and/or birch pollen allergy was investigated 10 years after initiation of a 3-year course of SIT with standardized allergen extracts of grass and/or birch or no SIT respectively. Conjunctival provocations were performed outside the season and methacholine bronchial provocations were performed during the season and winter. Asthma was assessed by clinical evaluation. RESULTS: The significant improvements in rhinoconjunctivitis and conjunctival sensitivity persisted at the 10-year follow-up. Significantly less actively treated subjects had developed asthma at 10-year follow-up as evaluated by clinical symptoms [odds ratio 2.5 (1.1-5.9)]. Patients who developed asthma among controls were 24/53 and in the SIT group 16/64. The longitudinal treatment effect when adjusted for bronchial hyper-responsiveness and asthma status at baseline including all observations at 3, 5 and 10 years follow-up (children with or without asthma at baseline, n = 189; 511 observations) was statistically significant (P = 0.0075). The odds ratio for no-asthma was 4.6 95% CI (1.5-13.7) in favor of SIT. CONCLUSION: A 3-year course of SIT with standardized allergen extracts has shown long-term clinical effects and the potential of preventing development of asthma in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis up to 7 years after treatment. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Specific immunotherapy has long-term clinical effects and the potential of preventing development of asthma in children with allergic rhino conjunctivitis up to 7 years after treatment termination.     

Safety and efficacy of Juniperus ashei sublingual-swallow ultra-rush pollen immunotherapy in cypress rhinoconjunctivitis. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of high-dose sublingual-swallow immunotherapy (SLIT) has been established in pollen rhinoconjunctivitis. This treatment has now been evaluated using an ultra-rush incremental dose regimen with a Juniperus ashei allergen extract in patients allergic to Cupressus sempervirens and Cupressus arizonica. METHODS: Patients received either placebo or SLIT. Evaluation of safety was based on the frequency of adverse events during the incremental dose period (half a day) and during maintenance therapy (4 months). Evaluation of efficacy was based on symptom and medication scores at the pollen peak. RESULTS: Seventy of the 76 patients included completed the study. There were no drop-outs during the rush procedure. One patient in the active group dropped out during the maintenance therapy due to adverse events: gastric pain and vomiting. There was also 1 drop-out in the placebo group due to pregnancy. Adverse events were infrequent, local and mild. Symptom scores for rhinitis and conjunctivitis were not statistically different between groups, but there was a marked and significant (p < 0.03) decrease of the medication score (about 50%) and nasal steroid consumption (about 75%) in the active treatment group. An increase from baseline of serum IgE and IgG4 J. ashei-specific antibodies was only observed in actively treated patients (p < 0.04 and p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The tolerability and safety of high-dose ultra-rush SLIT were comparable to those reported in previous SLIT studies. SLIT with J. ashei extract, due to its high Jun a 1 content, significantly reduced nasal steroid consumption in patients allergic to European cypress.     

Clinical safety and tolerability of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in controlled clinical trials in patients aged ≥ 6 years

OBJECTIVE: Montelukast is a leukotriene receptor antagonist administered orally once daily for treatment of chronic asthma in adults and children. A comprehensive analysis of safety data from double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials with montelukast has not been previously reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pooled analysis of safety data from 11 multicentre, randomized, controlled montelukast Phase IIb and III trials and five long-term extension studies was performed. A total of 3386 adult patients (aged 15-85 years) and 336 paediatric patients (aged 6-14 years) were enrolled in the trials; 2031 adults received montelukast for up to 4.1 years, and 257 children received montelukast for up to 1.8 years. Summary statistics comparing incidences of adverse events among treatment groups were calculated. RESULTS: The overall incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events among montelukast-treated patients, both adult and paediatric, was similar to that among patients receiving placebo. There were no clinically relevant differences in individual adverse events, including infectious upper respiratory conditions and transaminase elevations, between montelukast and placebo groups. Discontinuations due to adverse events occurred with similar frequencies during placebo, montelukast and inhaled beclomethasone therapy. No dose-related adverse effects of montelukast were observed in adults treated with dosages as high as 200 mg per day (20 times the recommended dose) for 5 months. This tolerability profile montelukast observed in clinical trials has been generally reflected in the post-marketing safety experience seen to date. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate a tolerability profile for montelukast similar to placebo during both short-term and long-term administration, even at doses substantially higher than the recommended clinical dose of 10 mg once daily for adults and 5 mg once daily for children aged 6-14 years.     

Specific IgG4 Production during House Dust Mite Immunotherapy among Age, Gender and Allergic Disease Populations

Background: Specific IgG4 induced by allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) is an immunological marker related to the appearance of clinical tolerance. But specific IgG4 levels in different age, gender and allergic disease populations have not been fully investigated. Methods: This study involved 226 children and 109 adults with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma receiving a 156-week course of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p) subcutaneous SIT. Symptom and medication scores, forced expiratory volume after 1 s (FEV(1)) and Der p-specific IgG4 levels at weeks 0, 5, 10, 25, 52, 104 and 156 were analyzed. Results: Rhinitis symptom and medication scores and FEV(1) % predicted in children showed significantly greater improvement than in adults at week 104 and 156 (p < 0.05). Levels of Der p-specific IgG4 showed a significant increase after 10 weeks of subcutaneous SIT (p < 0.0001) and continued to increase during the 156-week SIT period. Before SIT, the initial Der p-specific IgG4 level was higher in children than adults (p = 0.0004). The increase ratio of Der p-specific IgG4 was higher in children than adults at 52 weeks (p < 0.001) and 104 weeks (p = 0.0156) of SIT, and was higher in rhinitis compared to asthma patients at 156 weeks of SIT (p = 0.0244). There was no difference between males and females at any time points. Conclusion: Children are more responsive to SIT, demonstrating clinical and FEV(1) improvement and producing higher levels of allergen-specific IgG4 during a shorter SIT period compared to adults. Rhinitis patients show a higher increase in specific IgG4 compared to patients with asthma symptoms. The increase of Der p-specific IgG4 reflects a specific response of the immune system towards the SIT vaccine being administrated.     

Grass pollen immunotherapy as an effective therapy for childhood seasonal allergic asthma

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the use of specific immunotherapy (SIT) for childhood seasonal allergic asthma. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the efficacy and safety of SIT with Alutard SQ grass pollen (Phleum pratense Alutard SQ; ALK-Abelló, H?rsholm, Denmark) in children with seasonal allergic asthma. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy of grass pollen SIT over 2 pollen seasons was performed. Children (3-16 years) with a history of seasonal allergic asthma sensitized to grass pollen (P pratense) and requiring at least 200 microg of inhaled beclomethasone equivalent per day were enrolled. Subjects with symptomatic asthma or rhinoconjunctivitis outside the grass pollen season were excluded. The primary outcome measure was a combined asthma symptom-medication score during the second pollen season. Secondary outcome measures included end-point titration skin prick testing and conjunctival and bronchial provocation testing to allergen, sputum eosinophilia, exhaled nitric oxide, and adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects were enrolled. Thirty-five subjects provided data for analysis. The use of SIT was associated with a substantial reduction in asthma symptom-medication score compared with that after placebo (P = .04). There were also significant reductions in cutaneous (P = .002), conjunctival (P = .02), and bronchial (P = .01) reactivity to allergen after SIT compared with that after placebo. The 2 groups had similar levels of airway inflammation, despite a trend toward less inhaled steroid use in the active group. No serious adverse events were reported, and no subjects withdrew because of adverse events. CONCLUSION: The study has shown that SIT is effective and well tolerated in children with seasonal allergic asthma to grass pollen.     

Long-term safety of once-daily budesonide in patients with early-onset mild persistent asthma: results of the Inhaled Steroid Treatment as Regular Therapy in Early Asthma (START) study.

BACKGROUND: The Inhaled Steroid Treatment as Regular Therapy in Early Asthma (START) study is a worldwide, randomized, prospective study to investigate early intervention with inhaled corticosteroids in recent-onset mild persistent asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of long-term treatment with once-daily budesonide therapy in patients with mild persistent asthma. METHODS: Patients aged 5 to 66 years with mild persistent asthma for fewer than 2 years and no previous regular corticosteroid treatment received budesonide or placebo once daily for 3 years, in addition to their usual asthma therapy. The daily budesonide dose was 200 microg for children younger than 11 years and 400 microg for those 11 years or older. RESULTS: Overall, 7,221 patients were included in the safety analysis, and a total of 21,520 adverse events were reported (10,850 in the budesonide group and 10,670 in the placebo group). The most commonly reported events included respiratory infections, rhinitis, pharyngitis, bronchitis, viral infections, and sinusitis. The number of deaths and serious adverse events were similar for children and adults in both treatment groups. Fewer asthma-related serious adverse events were reported with budesonide (162) compared with placebo (276). Oral candidiasis was reported more frequently with budesonide (1.2%) than with placebo (0.5%); the frequencies of other adverse effects previously reported to be associated with inhaled corticosteroids (psychiatric disorders, skin disorders, and allergic reactions) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Three-year treatment with budesonide once daily (200 or 400 microg) is safe and well tolerated in children and adults with newly detected mild persistent asthma.     

Efficacy of combination treatment with anti-IgE plus specific immunotherapy in polysensitized children and adolescents with seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy (SIT) and treatment with monoclonal anti-IgE antibody have complementary modes of action. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether combined therapy could provide better efficacy than either treatment alone. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded trial to assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered anti-IgE (omalizumab) or placebo in children and adolescents with seasonal allergic rhinitis in both a birch pollen season and a grass pollen season (sequential seasons together lasting an average of 84 days). There were 4 treatment arms. Each subject was started on SIT-birch or SIT-grass, and anti-IgE or placebo was started before and maintained during the anticipated pollen seasons (a total of 24 weeks). The primary efficacy variable was symptom load, the sum of daily symptom severity score plus rescue medication use. RESULTS: A total of 221 subjects (intent-to-treat population) aged 6 to 17 years were analyzed for efficacy. Combination therapy reduced symptom load over the 2 pollen seasons by 48% (P <.001) over SIT alone. When analyzed separately by season, the 2 groups receiving unrelated SIT were considered placebo controls. In the grass season, symptom loads were as follows: unrelated (birch) SIT + placebo, 0.89 (reference value); unrelated (birch) SIT + anti-IgE, 0.49 (-45%); SIT-grass + placebo, 0.61 (-32%); SIT-grass + anti-IgE, 0.26 (-71%). CONCLUSION: Anti-IgE therapy conferred a protective effect independent of the type of allergen. Additional clinical benefit was demonstrated in both pollen seasons, whether there was coverage by SIT or not. This combination might prove useful for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, particularly for polysensitized patients.     

Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis--the seeming and the real

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous specific immunotherapy (SIT) has been shown to be a causal treatment with long-term efficacy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma, and a preventive measure against the development of asthma and new sensitizations. As it is associated with several inconveniences and serious side effects, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been developed to evade these problems. METHODS: The present review of previously published studies on allergic rhinoconjunctivitis aimed to determine the efficacy of SLIT in comparison with subcutaneous treatment and to summarize long-term results of immunotherapy and its effects on the prevention and treatment of asthma and the prevention of new sensitizations. RESULTS: The effect of SLIT on allergic rhinoconjunctivitis is low to moderate, depends on the allergen used and is more pronounced in adults than in children, in whom a consistent effect has not been demonstrated. Direct comparison with SIT shows conflicting and inconsistent results. Detailed studies on the prevention of asthma and new sensitizations are not available. Consistent effects of asthma treatment on both symptom and medication scores and lung function have not been reported. A quantitative evaluation is not possible due to indistinct inclusion criteria and different outcome criteria. In summary, currently SLIT plays no significant role in the treatment of asthma, apart from children monosensitized to house dust mites in whom it may have low-moderate effects. Only one study deals with the long-term efficacy of SLIT, which demonstrated a persistent positive effect on asthma, whereas data on rhinoconjunctivitis are completely lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Primary and secondary targets of specific immunotherapy have not been answered satisfactorily for the sublingual route. To date, SLIT cannot be recommended as an adequate alternative to the subcutaneous form. Questions regarding the cumulative dose, duration of therapy and immunological mechanisms have also not been answered. The indication should thus be limited to adult patients with pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis being unable to perform SIT, e.g. due to significant side effects.     

Rapid onset of control with budesonide Turbuhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

BACKGROUND: Budesonide (Pulmicort) is an inhaled corticosteroid with high topical potency but low systemic activity. Turbuhaler is a novel breath-actuated, multi-dose, dry-powder inhaler. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of two different dose regimens of budesonide Turbuhaler, compared with placebo, in adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma not well-controlled with bronchodilator therapy. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of 200 microg and 400 microg of budesonide, administered twice daily via Turbuhaler, with placebo, in 273 adult patients (aged 19 to 70 years) with mild-to-moderate asthma (FEV1 67% of predicted normal), not well-controlled with bronchodilator therapy. Efficacy was assessed by pulmonary function tests and patient assessments of asthma symptom control. Safety was assessed in terms of adverse events, laboratory evaluations, and physical examinations. RESULTS: Two hundred and 400 microg of budesonide bid were significantly more effective than placebo at improving morning PEF (mean differences from placebo of 43.63 L/min and 40.10 L/min, respectively; P < .001) and FEV1 (mean differences from placebo of 0.44 L, and 0.50 L, respectively; P < .001) over the 12-week treatment period. Onset of action as assessed by morning PEF was within two days. Basal and stimulated plasma cortisol concentrations were not significantly affected by budesonide treatment compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of adults suffering from mild-to-moderate asthma with budesonide Turbuhaler is well tolerated and results in a rapid onset of asthma control which is maintained over time.     

Immunotherapy safety: a prospective multi-centric monitoring study of biologically standardized therapeutic vaccines for allergic diseases

Background The fear of side‐effects has led to strict regulations preventing a more widespread use of specific immunotherapy (SIT) in some countries, in spite of the low risk of systemic reactions (SRs) reported in well‐controlled studies. The goal of the study was to carry out a prospective and multi‐centric trial to evaluate the safety, risk factors and compliance degree of commercially available SIT. Materials and methods The study was carried out in 14 allergy departments from Spain. Four‐hundred and eighty‐eight patients with rhinitis and/or asthma were submitted to treatment with biologically standardized allergen extracts commercially available. They were administered following the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines. Results Four hundred and twenty‐three patients (86.7%) completed the treatment and remained under control at the end of the trial. Out of 17 526 administered doses, 17 368 doses (99.1%) were not associated with a reaction. Eighteen patients (3.7%) experienced 53 (0.3% of the doses) SRs. All immediate SRs were mild or moderate and responded well to ordinary treatment measures. There were no fatal reactions, anaphylactic shock or life‐threatening reactions. A higher ratio of SRs was found among asthmatic and dust mite allergic patients, although multi‐variable logistic analysis did not demonstrate any risk factor associated with SRs. There was also a subgroup of patients at risk for recurrent reactions, and therefore 40% of SRs had been avoided if the maximal number of SRs had been previously limited to only three SRs. Conclusions This multi‐centric study showed that SIT was a safe treatment with a very good compliance. Future guidelines of SIT should limit the maximal number of SRs.     

Immunotherapy with a standardized Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract. V. Duration of the efficacy of immunotherapy after its cessation

Specific immunotherapy (SIT) using a standardized mite extract is effective and safe when administered under optimal conditions. However, the duration of its effectiveness after cessation of treatment remains unknown. Forty asthmatic subjects who had received SIT with a standardized Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p) extract under the same protocol were studied. All had received SIT for a period of 12–96 months and were not receiving pharmacologic treatment. The FEV₁ was within normal range in all patients. After cessation of treatment, patients were followed for up to 3 years at 6-month intervals. The patient was considered to have relapsed when symptoms of asthma and/or rhinitis occurred and/or when pulmonary function tests were impaired. Skin tests with increasing concentrations of Der p were carried out before and at the end of SIT. Forty-five percent of the patients did not relapse. The duration of efficacy of SIT was related to the duration of SIT itself ( P <0.04). Most patients who did not relapse had a decrease in skin test reactivity at the end of SIT, whereas most patients who relapsed did not show any change ( P < 0.003). The duration of efficacy of SIT after its cessation depends upon the duration of SIT and may be predicted by the effect of SIT on skin tests.     

How to design and evaluate randomized controlled trials in immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: an ARIA-GA(2) LEN statement

Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is one of the treatments for allergic rhinitis. However, for allergists, nonspecialists, regulators, payers, and patients, there remain gaps in understanding the evaluation of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Although treating the same diseases, RCTs in SIT and pharmacotherapy should be considered separately for several reasons, as developed in this study. These include the severity and persistence of allergic rhinitis in the patients enrolled in the study, the problem of the placebo, allergen exposure (in particular pollen and mite), the analysis and reporting of the study, the level of symptoms of placebo-treated patients, the clinical relevance of the efficacy of SIT, the need for a validated combined symptom-medication score, the differences between children and adults and pharmacoeconomic analyses. This statement reviews issues raised by the interpretation of RCTs in sublingual immunotherapy. It is not possible to directly extrapolate the rules or parameters used in medication RCTs to SIT. It also provides some suggestions for the research that will be needed. Interestingly, some of the research questions can be approached with the available data obtained from large RCTs.     

House-dust-mite sublingual-swallow immunotherapy (SLIT) in perennial rhinitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of sublingual-swallow immunotherapy (SLIT) in rhinitis caused by house-dust mite were evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study including 75 patients for 24 months. METHODS: Patients received either placebo or SLIT with a standardized Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (D.pt.) - D. farinae (D.f) 50/50 extract. The mean cumulative dose was 90,000 IR, equivalent to 2.2 mg of Der p 1 and 1.7 mg of Der f I. Symptom and medication scores were assessed throughout the study. Exposure to house-dust mite, skin sensitivity, and serum specific IgE and IgG4 were assessed before starting treatment and after 12 and 24 months. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (36 active-36 placebo) were eligible for intent-to-treat analysis. Thirty-six patients dropped out of the study. The number of patients who dropped out due to lack of efficacy was eight out of 37 (21.6%) in the active treatment group compared to 15 out of 38 (39.5%) in the placebo group (chi-square=2.81, P=0.09). Total symptom and medication scores decreased significantly after 12 and 24 months (P<0.05) of treatment in both groups, but no significant difference was observed between the active and placebo groups. After 24 months, the number of patients with high levels of indoor allergenic load decreased significantly in both groups compared to baseline data (P=0.01). Specific IgE (D.pt. and D.f.) increased significantly in the active treatment group after 12 and 24 months, while no change was observed in the placebo group. Specific IgG4 levels were not significantly modified in either group. Two patients in each group reported mild adverse effects. No severe adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that SLIT in rhinitis caused by house-dust mite was safe, but there was a lack of consistent clinical benefit compared to placebo, probably due to the impact of the allergen avoidance measures that lowered the allergen burden.     

Prevention of new sensitizations in asthmatic children monosensitized to house dust mite by specific immunotherapy. A six-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is a recognized way of treating IgE-mediated respiratory diseases. The clinical outcome is usually better in allergic children than in adults. OBJECTIVE: To increase our knowledge of the ability of SIT to prevent the onset of new sensitizations in monosensitized subjects, so far poorly documented. METHODS: 134 children (age range 5-8 years), who had intermittent asthma with or without rhinitis, with single sensitization to mite allergen (skin prick test and serum-specific IgE), were enrolled. SIT was proposed to all the children's parents, but was accepted by only 75 of them (SIT Group). The remaining 63 children were treated with medication only, and were considered the Control Group. Injective SIT with mite mix was administered to the SIT Group during the first three years and all patients were followed for a total of 6 years. All patients were checked for allergic sensitization(s) by skin prick test and serum-specific IgE every year until the end of the follow-up period. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable in terms of age, sex and disease characteristics. 123 children completed the follow-up study. At the end of the study, 52 out of 69 children (75.4%) in the SIT Group showed no new sensitization, compared to 18 out of 54 children (33.3%) in the Control Group (P < 0.0002). Parietaria, Gramineae and Olea were the most common allergens responsible for the new sensitization(s). CONCLUSIONS: According to our data, SIT may prevent the onset of new sensitizations in children with respiratory symptoms monosensitized to house dust mite (HDM).     

特异性免疫治疗对哮喘和鼻炎患者血清炎性细胞因子的影响

目的通过检测对屋尘螨过敏的的哮喘和/或鼻炎患者在特异性免疫治疗或常规药物治疗过程中血清白介素(IL)-5、IL-10、IL-17、INF-γ及TNF-α等5种细胞因子的水平,探讨特异性免疫治疗对过敏性哮喘和鼻炎患者血清炎性细胞因子的影响。方法选取44例在广州呼吸疾病研究所接受标准化屋尘螨特异性免疫治疗(SIT)满1年的哮喘和/或鼻炎患者作为SIT组,50例对屋尘螨过敏并未接受SIT治疗的哮喘和/或鼻炎患者作为病例组,另外选取23例无过敏、无哮喘与鼻炎的健康自愿者作为对照组,用悬浮芯片方法检测三组人群血清中IL-5、IL-10、IL-17、INF-γ及TNF-α等5种细胞因子的水平。结果服从正态分布的数据以均数±标准差表示,偏态分布的数据以中位数(四分位间距数)表示。FEV1%(%)在SIT组、病例组及对照组中分别为93.05±15.62、87.0±13.51、95.51±7.84,三组比较显示无显著差异(P>0.05);AHR在这三组中分别为2(0,3)、1(0,2)、0(0,0),三组比较显示SIT组及病例组均显著高于对照组(P<0.05),SIT组与病例组比较无显著差异(P>0.05);血清IL-5(pg/mL)在SIT组、病例组及对照组中的水平分别为1.46(0.62,2.71)、1.95(1.18,2.46)、0.34(0.01,0.83),其中SIT组显著低于病例组(P=0.001),病例组显著低于对照组(P<0.001);IL-10(pg/ml)在SIT组、病例组及对照组中的水平分别为1.6(0.95,2.69)、1.25(0.93,1.8)、0.43(0.21,1.07),SIT组与病例组显著高于对照组(P<0.001);TNF-α(pg/mL)在SIT组、病例组及对照组中的水平分别为10.81(2.18,31.3)、3.39(1.78,6.83)、0.09(0.09,1.18),其中SIT组显著高于病例组与对照组(P=0.004),病例组又显著高于对照组(P<0.001)。IL-17与INF-γ在三组受试者的血清中均不可测出。结论哮喘和鼻炎患者血清中IL-5、TNF-α水平显著高于正常人,说明IL-5和TNF-α在哮喘和/或鼻炎的致病中发挥重要作用;关于SIT对炎性细胞因子的影响还有待我们进一步的研究。     

Usefulness of specific immunotherapy in patients with severe perennial allergic rhinitis induced by house dust mite: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of specific immunotherapy (SIT) in patients with severe house dust mite (HDM)-induced perennial allergic rhinitis using diary cards and objective endpoints. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six adult patients were selected with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis due to HDM allergy uncontrolled by regular anti-allergic drugs. Twenty-eight patients completed the study, 22 of these patients also had mild asthma. Subjects were stratified for HDM sensitivity on the basis of their 4-week diary card score and the size of their immediate and late-phase skin reaction to HDM. The groups were well matched for all relevant parameters. Patients were randomized to receive active preparation (Alutard(R)-SQ, ALK, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract) or an identical placebo preparation. Increasing doses were administered until the maintenance dose was reached. This dose was then given once a month for 12 months. RESULTS: Clinical efficacy was evaluated by symptom medication diary cards recorded for 4 weeks after 12 months of continuous treatment and compared with pre-treatment scores. Skin test reactivity was re-measured after 12 months of treatment to HDM, cat dander and codeine phosphate. After 1 year of treatment, the actively treated group showed a 58% reduction in diary card symptom scores (P<0.002) and a 20% reduction in the use of rescue medication. The placebo group had a 32% reduction in symptom scores (P=NS), but no reduction in rescue medication requirements. The active group showed 36% reduction in skin prick test sensitivity to D. pteronyssinus (P=0.006), while the placebo group values were unchanged. Skin reactivity to codeine was unchanged in both groups. No significant adverse reactions to SIT were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: One year of SIT for D. pteronyssinus in patients with poorly controlled rhinitis (+/-mild asthma) produced clinically useful improvement as shown by symptom-medication diary cards and reductions in immediate skin reactions compared with placebo treatment.     

Safety of various dosage regimens during induction of sublingual immunotherapy. A preliminary study

BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been demonstrated to be a viable alternative to injection immunotherapy. Administration of high doses of allergens to ensure efficacy has been shown to be well tolerated. The aim of the present study was the first step to address the issue of fast-induction regimens using various induction SLIT regimens in paediatric and adult patients. METHODS: Sixty-four patients (age range 5-46 years) with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis were enrolled in an 8-month double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of SLIT. Sixty-three patients were randomized to four groups and evaluated at the end of the study. One group received placebo (n = 16) and the other three groups (n = 47) received five grass pollen extracts according to three different induction regimens: regimen 1 starting with 3 IR tablets (n = 15), regimen 2 starting with 10 IR (n = 16) and regimen 3 starting with 30 IR (n = 16). The maintenance phase was made with sublingual-swallow drops at the same concentration of 300 IR/ml for all the patients. Adverse events were recorded on diary cards. RESULTS: During induction phase, 25/47 patients in the SLIT groups had adverse reactions in comparison to 2/16 patients in the placebo group (p < 0.05). The rate of adverse reactions was 33.3% (11.8-61.6) (95% CI) for regimen 1, 31.3% (11.0-58.7) for regimen 2, 43.8% (19.8-70.1) for regimen 3 and 12.5% (1.6-38.3) for placebo. Fifty-seven reactions were local reactions involving the oral region (54 SLIT, 3 placebo) and 13 were systemic reactions (all in the SLIT groups). 11/13 reactions were mild (gastrointestinal disorders, rhinoconjunctivitis), 1/13 consisted of moderate asthma and 1/13 consisted of severe abdominal pain. No urticaria, angioedema or life-threatening events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data showed that various induction regimens for SLIT are generally well tolerated and could allow a fast build-up phase of SLIT.     

The effect of oral steroids with and without vitamin D3 on early efficacy of immunotherapy in asthmatic children

Background The possibility of additional strategies to enhance the effectiveness of specific immunotherapy (SIT) is highly attractive. Aim The aim of our study was to assess the influence of oral corticosteroids and oral corticosteroids combined with vitamin D₃ on the early clinical and immunological effects of SIT. Methods It was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial conducted in 54 asthmatic children allergic to house dust mites. Intervention was based on receiving a single dose of oral steroid, with or without vitamin D₃, or placebo only on the day of the build‐up phase of SIT. Results After 12 months of SIT, the median daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose, which controls the symptoms of asthma, was reduced by 25% in the steroid group. However, a 50% reduction of the median daily ICS dose was observed in the control group. The clinical effects of SIT were not affected in the steroid+D₃ group. Concomitantly, we found that intervention with prednisone significantly impaired the induction of T regulatory lymphocytes. Importantly, the clinical and immunological effects of SIT were not affected by intervention with steroids administered with vitamin D₃. Conclusions Our study failed to show a beneficial effect of oral corticosteroids on allergen‐specific immunotherapy. We observed that the combined administration of a corticosteroid drug and allergen extract suppressed the early clinical and immunological effects of SIT and that vitamin D₃ prevented this ‘adverse’ influence of steroids.