Mini-Laparotomy for Superior Mesenteric Artery Aneurysm Due to Takayasu's Arteritis

Superior mesenteric artery aneurysm (SMAA) is reported to be the third-most common type of visceral aneurysm (VA), accounting for 5% of all VAs. The etiology of SMAA is commonly thought to be infection, and it usually exists in the proximal part of the superior mesenteric artery, which is suitable for endovascular treatment. We herein report an extremely rare case of the distal part of SMAA caused by Takayasu''s arteritis (TA), which was successfully resected using a mini-laparotomy method without impairing the intestinal blood supply. A 51-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with sustained fever and lower back pain. Physical examination showed that she had a discrepancies in blood pressure between both arms. Contrast-enhanced whole-body computed tomography showed stenosis of the thoracic aorta and an aneurysm located in the distal part of the superior mesenteric artery. The diameter of the aneurysm was 4.5 cm. The aneurysm was resected via 4-cm mini-laparotomy, and the vascularity of the intestine was successfully preserved. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was diagnosed as having TA based on both clinical and pathologic findings. Additional corticosteroid therapy was started to treat the arteritis, and at 3-month follow-up she was without critical incidents. Mini-laparotomy is a safe and less-invasive approach to treat SMAA, especially when the lesion is located in the distal part of the artery.Key words: Superior mesenteric artery aneurysm, Takayasu''s arteritis, Mini-laparotomyVisceral aneurysms (VAs) are rare, with an incidence of 0.01% to 2% in routine autopsies.^1,2 However, the recent widespread use of computed tomography (CT) has led to frequent incidental detection of them.³ Superior mesenteric artery aneurysm (SMAA) is reported to be the third-most common type of VA,⁴ accounting for 5% of all VAs.⁵ Although SMAA shows few specific symptoms, several reports have revealed that it has a very high risk of rupture and mortality.^4,5 SMAA is commonly located in the proximal part of the SMA,^4,6 which is suitable for endovascular treatment (ET).^7,8 Here, we report a rare case of SMAA associated with Takayasu''s arteritis (TA), located in the distal part of the SMA and treated by surgical resection using the mini-laparotomy method.     

Grey Relational Analysis of Benefit of Surgical Management for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Grey relational analysis was used to compare the long-term outcomes of endovascular repair (EVAR) versus open repair for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Patients with AAA undergoing open repair (n = 133) or EVAR (n = 88) from July 1995 to January 2009 were studied retrospectively. Compared with EVAR, longer periods of postoperative intubation and hospital stay (P < 0.001) were required for open repair. The operation time was significantly longer in open surgery than in EVAR (P < 0.001). Patients in the open repair group required larger volumes of intraoperative blood transfusion than those in EVAR (P < 0.001), and they had more of a trend of cardiac failure after surgery than those in the EVAR group. The operative mortality was similar in both groups. On follow-up, the all-cause mortality and the rates of ischemic legs within 5 years had no significant differences between the 2 procedures (P > 0.05). The grey relational grades in EVAR and open repair were 0.673 and 0.936, respectively. Compared with open repair, patients with AAAs undergoing EVAR had fewer complications in the short term and had a similar all-cause mortality in the long term.Key words: Grey relational analysis, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Endovascular repair, Open repairAortic aneurysm can be treated with open repair surgery or endovascular repair (EVAR). Several studies, including the EVAR1 and EVAR2 studies, have reported the outcomes of EVAR versus open repair.^1–7 These trials showed that EVAR is superior to open surgery in terms of operative mortality in the short term, and there were no differences in mortality or aneurysm-related mortality in the long term. However, any possible long-term benefit from EVAR versus open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has not been proven,² and the data of long-term mortality rate after repair surgery are limited. It is necessary to study this issue to get a clear answer.Grey analysis defines situations with no information as black, and those with perfect information as white.⁸ Yet, neither of these idealized conditions occurs in real world. In fact, situations between these extremes are described as being grey. Therefore, a grey system means a system in which some of the information is known and some of the information is unknown. Grey analysis provides techniques for determining a good solution, an appropriate solution for practical problems, it has been used in clinical studies.^9–11 In order to investigate the long-term effects of EVAR versus open surgery for AAA, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of patients with AAA who underwent EVAR versus open repair by grey relational analysis.     

Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer. An Independent Prognostic Factor Still Reliable

To evaluate whether, in a sample of patients radically treated for colorectal carcinoma, the preoperative determination of the carcinoembryonic antigen (p-CEA) may have a prognostic value and constitute an independent risk factor in relation to disease-free survival. The preoperative CEA seems to be related both to the staging of colorectal neoplasia and to the patient''s prognosis, although this—to date—has not been conclusively demonstrated and is still a matter of intense debate in the scientific community. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. A total of 395 patients were radically treated for colorectal carcinoma. The preoperative CEA was statistically compared with the 2010 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging, the T and N parameters, and grading. All parameters recorded in our database were tested for an association with disease-free survival (DFS). Only factors significantly associated (P < 0.05) with the DFS were used to build multivariate stepwise forward logistic regression models to establish their independent predictors. A statistically significant relationship was found between p-CEA and tumor staging (P < 0.001), T (P < 0.001) and N parameters (P = 0.006). In a multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors found were: p-CEA, stages N1 and N2 according to AJCC, and G3 grading (grade). A statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) was evident between the DFS of patients with normal and high p-CEA levels. Preoperative CEA makes a pre-operative selection possible of those patients for whom it is likely to be able to predict a more advanced staging.Key words: Colorectal carcinoma, Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, Disease-free survival, Independent prognostic factorIn the world today, more than 1 million cases of patients with colorectal neoplasia are identified each year. Forty percent of these will have a poor prognosis for which targeted therapeutic strategies could most likely be more effective.^1–3 For this reason, finding prognostic factors that are early, reliable, and related to the extent of the tumor is of the utmost importance. Among these, the most that are considered even to this day are T and N parameters.^1,2,4,5 Less relied upon, however, is the M parameter, which is often understaged due to inadequate pretreatment diagnostic methods.⁶ However, these parameters, which are available to us only after surgery, do not represent the gold standard. In fact, the prognosis of patients with the same staging is often various and that the need to continually implement ever-changing variables in an already excessively fragmented staging is still present.^2,4,7–9Recently, in light of these needs, great attention has been paid to the study of molecular and genetic markers. At present, these markers still have not found a regular application due to the complexity of their determination, the difficulty of standardization and, last but not least, the low cost-benefit ratio.^1,3,4,9,10With this in mind, in our opinion, the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) maintains its position, as for over 30 years it has continued to be the most widely used marker¹¹ and whose validity, with regard to colorectal follow-up, has been sanctioned by leading organizations such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)¹² and the European Group on Tumor Markers.¹³ Moreover, as Herrera¹⁴ and Wanebo¹⁵ had already reported by the end of the ‘70s, the preoperative determination of the CEA (p-CEA) seems to be related both to the staging of colorectal neoplasia and to the patient''s prognosis. However, to date, none of this has been conclusively demonstrated and is still a matter of intense debate both in prestigious scientific journals^{4,7,11,16–21} as well as in different guidelines.²²The American Society of Clinical Oncology itself, if on the one hand suggests using the determination of the CEA in the preoperative staging thus justifying a worse prognosis when increased,¹² on the other, does not validate using the p-CEA in the determination of an adjuvant or neo-adjuvant therapeutic strategy.²³Regarding this issue, we believe it still pertinent to evaluate whether in a sample of patients radically treated for colorectal carcinoma, the determination of the p-CEA may have a prognostic value and constitute an independent risk factor in relation to disease-free survival (DFS).     

Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Rectus Sheath Block in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Surgery

We aimed to assess the efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and rectus sheath (RS) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. Few studies have addressed the efficacy and safety associated with TAP block and RS block for laparoscopic surgery. Thirty-two patients underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery, either with TAP and RS block (Block⁺ group, n = 18) or without peripheral nerve block (Block⁻ group, n = 14). Preoperatively, TAP and RS block were performed through ultrasound guidance. We evaluated postoperative pain control and patient outcomes. The mean postoperative hospital stays were 1.56 days (Block+ group) and 2.07 days (Block⁻ group; range, 1–3 days in both groups; P = 0.0038). A total of 11 patients and 1 patient underwent day surgery in the Block⁺ and Block⁻ groups, respectively (P = 0.0012). Good postoperative pain control was more commonly observed in the Block⁺ group than in the Block⁻ group (P = 0.011). TAP and RS block was effective in reducing postoperative pain and was associated with a fast recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery.Key words: TAP block, RS block, Inguinal hernia, Laparoscopic surgeryInguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical operations. The debate regarding the best repair technique for inguinal hernia is ongoing. Several trials have compared the efficacy of the Lichtenstein and laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernia repair.^1–6 Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia has certain advantages over open repair, such as reduced postoperative pain and morbidity, early recovery, rapid return to work, and better quality of life.^3–7 Several strategies have been reported to ameliorate postoperative pain in laparoscopic surgery.⁸The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a regional anesthetic technique that provides analgesia to the parietal peritoneum as well as to the skin and muscles of the anterior abdominal wall.^9,10 Despite a relatively low risk of complications and a high success rate using modern techniques, TAP block remains overwhelmingly underused. Although the technique is technically straightforward, it has not been adopted in clinical practice.^9,11 Moreover, rectus sheath (RS) block has been reported to be effective for pain management in patients undergoing umbilical hernia repair surgery.¹²Generally, in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery, the sites of port incision are on the umbilical and bilateral middle abdomen. Those sites are associated with considerable postoperative discomfort. Thus, we performed TAP and RS block to ameliorate postoperative pain and improve patient outcomes. Here, we aimed to assess the efficacy of TAP and RS block in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery.     

Substernal Goiter: When is a Sternotomy Required?

The presence of substernal goiter is, per se, an indication for surgical management. Surgical approach of substernal goiter can most commonly be performed using the cervical access, but at times, a sternotomy or thoracotomy is necessary. The aim of this study was to identify the preoperative predictors of a sternotomy in the management of substernal goiter in order to provide better preoperative planning and patient consent. Between 2005 and 2012, 665 patients were referred to our clinic for thyroidectomy, 42 patients (6.3%) had substernal goiter and were included in this study. All substernal goiters were treated surgically, 38 (90.5%) by a cervical approach and 4 (9.5%) by full median sternotomy. All surgeries were successful, with no major postoperative complications. Minor postoperative complications of transient hypocalcemia and transient paralysis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve occurred in 5 (11.9%) and 2 (4.7%) cases, respectively. Indication of median sternotomy was as follows: extension of goiter below the aortic arch, large thyroid tissue extending towards tracheal bifurcation, and ectopic thyroid tissue in the mediastinum. Substernal goiter can be removed through a cervical incision, but on rare occasions, a median sternotomy may be required.Key words: Sternotomy, Substernal goiter, Surgery, TreatmentSubsternal goiter (SG) was first described by Haller in 1749 and first surgically removed by Klein in 1820.¹⁻⁴ There is no uniform definition of substernal goiter.¹⁻³ However, various different criteria have been suggested by authors. These include a thyroid gland extending 3 cm below the sternal notch or extension of the gland below the fourth thoracic vertebra.^5,6 An extension of the thyroid gland below the thoracic inlet has been defined as substernal, retrosternal, intrathoracic, or mediastinal goiter. Drawing upon the relationship of the intrathoracic extension of SG to the arcus aorta and the right atrium and findings from imaging methods, diagnostic classifications have been established that take into account the percentage of goitrous thyroid in the mediastinum.^7,8 Substernal goiters are common, with a reported incidence of 1−20% of all patients undergoing thyroidectomy.^3,5,9−14 Diagnosis of substernal goiter is most frequently made in the fifth or sixth decade of life, with a female/male rate of 4:1.^11,14,15 The vast majority of SGs (85−90%) are located in the anterior mediastinum with the remainder (10−15%) located in the posterior mediastinum.^1,10,16,17Substernal goiters show, in most cases, a slow-growing enlargement, which usually remain asymptomatic for many years; about 20−40% of substernal goiters are discovered as an incidental finding on a radiographic examination.^2,11,18 Patients with mediastinal goiter are rarely asymptomatic. The most common symptoms are related to compression of the airways and the esophagus, and represented by dyspnea, choking, inability to sleep comfortably, dysphagia, and hoarseness.^2,12,14,18 In the diagnostic management of mediastinal goiter, chest computed tomography (CT) was of the highest value. CT scanning is, at present, the most exhaustive examination for assessment of the extent of the goiter and compression effects on adjacent anatomic structures. A preoperative CT scan should be routinely performed in every suspicion of a substernal goiter.^12,19−21 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) adds little additional information to that obtained with CT and is not routinely used.¹¹Substernal goiter must be removed surgically due to relation to compressive symptoms, potential airway compromise, and the possibility of an association with thyroid malignancy.¹⁷ There is a general consensus that most can be successfully removed via a cervical approach and that thoracic access is rarely necessary.^9,11,12 Various factors have been reported to increase the likelihood of a median sternotomy being required. These factors include involvement of the posterior mediastinum, extension of the goiter to the aortic arch, recurrent goiter, superior vena cava obstruction, malignancy with local involvement, and emergent airway obstruction.^{6,10,12,16,17,19} In addition, inability to palpate the lowermost extent of the gland also is considered to be an indication for median sternotomy. The incidence of sternotomy in substernal goiter is variable, ranging between 0−11 %.^2,9,11,12 This wide range in incidence might be related to variation in the definition of substernal goiter.In order to improve preoperative planning and patient consent, we aimed to identify the preoperative predictors of a sternotomy in the management of substernal goiter.     

Application of a Z-Shaped Umbilical Incision and a Saline-Cooled Radiofrequency Device to Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for a Huge Liver Cyst: Report of a Case

When compared with other diseases, few authors have reported on single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for liver cysts. We herein describe our experience with SILS for a huge liver cyst with the application of an umbilical Z-shaped incision using a gel port and a high-density monopolar saline-cooled radiofrequency device with a successful outcome. An 80-old-year woman was diagnosed with a huge liver cyst with abdominal pain. She underwent percutaneous drainage of the liver cyst and injection of both absolute ethanol and an antimicrobial agent into the liver cyst at the previous hospital. Because of re-expansion of the liver cyst and symptom recurrence, we performed SILS for the liver cyst. An umbilical Z-shaped incision was made for gel port placement. After aspiration of the cystic fluid and dissection of the thin cystic wall by laparoscopic coagulating shears, the thick cystic wall was divided using an endoscopic linear stapler to avoid bleeding and bile leakage. After wide fenestration, a high-density monopolar saline-cooled radiofrequency device was applied for the ablation of the remnant membrane of the cystic wall. All maneuvers could be performed only through the gel port. The patient was discharged 4 days after surgery and was satisfied with the cosmetic results. This case shows that the application of an umbilical Z-shaped incision using a gel port and a high-density monopolar saline-cooled radiofrequency device is useful for the accomplishment of SILS for a huge liver cyst.Key words: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery, Liver cyst, Z-shaped umbilical incision, Saline-cooled radiofrequency deviceSince the laparoscopic procedure was introduced for the fenestration of a simple liver cyst in 1991,¹ laparoscopic surgery for symptomatic nonparasitic liver cysts has been recognized as a widely acceptable procedure to relieve symptoms.^2–5 In contrast, there are still few reports on single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for liver cysts.^6–10Ablation of the remnant membrane of the cystic wall is recognized as an important procedure for the prevention of recurrence.^2–5 In general, an argon beam coagulator is useful for such ablation, however, in laparoscopic surgery, intraoperative pulmonary embolism due to argon gas has been reported.^11,12We herein describe our experience with SILS for a huge liver cyst with the application of an umbilical Z-shaped incision using a gel port and a high-density monopolar saline-cooled radiofrequency device with a successful outcome.     

Common Bile Duct Exploration in an Elderly Asian Population

Common bile duct exploration (CBDE) is an accepted treatment for choledocholithiasis. This procedure is not well studied in the elderly population. Here we evaluate the results of CBDE in elderly patients (>70 years) and compare the open (group A) with the laparoscopic group (group B). A retrospective review was performed of elderly patients with proven common bile duct (CBD) stones who underwent CBDE from January 2005 to December 2009. There were 55 patients in group A and 33 patients in group B. Mean age was 77.6 years (70–91 years). Both groups had similar demographics, liver function tests, and stone size—12 mm (range, 5–28 mm). Patients who had empyema (n = 9), acute cholecystitis (n = 15), and those who had had emergency surgery (n = 28) were more likely to be in group A (P < 0.05). The mean length of stay for group A was 11.7 ± 7.3 days; for group B, 5.2 ± 6.3 days; the complication rate was higher in group A (group A, 38.2%; group B, 8.5%; P = 0.072). The overall complication and mortality rate was 29.5% and 3.4%, respectively. CBDE can be performed safely in the elderly with accepted morbidity and mortality. The laparoscopic approach is feasible and safe in elective setting even in the elderly.Key words: Common bile duct exploration, Elderly, LaparoscopyThe treatment of common bile duct (CDB) stones varies, and the optimal management is still a matter of debate.¹ The treatment options include pre- or postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) or common bile duct exploration (CBDE) with LC or open cholecystectomy (OC). LC is necessary, as up to 47% of patients will develop recurrent symptoms from cholelithiasis.² However, in the former approach (ERCP with LC), patients will have to undergo 2 procedures and be exposed to the risks of ERCP. ERCP has a mortality and morbidity rate of up to 1% and 15.9%, respectively.^3,4 Furthermore, patients who opt for preoperative ERCP may still require CBDE if stone clearance is not achieved and may eventually end up having multiple procedures.^5–7Although laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is an accepted treatment, the technical difficulties associated with this procedure have made it slower to gain widespread acceptance.⁸ Nonetheless, as surgeons gain more expertise and experience in laparoscopic biliary surgery, LCBDE is fast becoming part of the armamentarium for dealing with CBD stones. The safety and efficacy of LCBDE is well studied in the general population. In the literature, the ductal stone clearance rate for all comers is approximately 85% to 97.3% and has an associated mortality rate of 0.3% to 0.8% and morbidity of 3.7% to 33%.^9–13 The overall length of stay is shorter in LCBDE compared with the 2-stage approach.¹⁴ With all these advantages, it has even been suggested that LCBDE is the preferred treatment, especially in patients who are fit and young.¹⁵ Of interest, the incidence of CBD stones is higher in the elderly; however, this procedure is not well studied in this group of patients.^16,17 There are also concerns regarding the safety of biliary tract surgery in elderly patients especially in the acute setting.¹⁸ With this in mind, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate and analyze the results of CBDE in elderly patients and to compare the results between the open and laparoscopic groups.     

Intravenous Lidocaine for Effective Pain Relief After a Laparoscopic Colectomy: A Prospective,Randomized, Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled Study

A perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion has been reported to decrease postoperative pain. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine in reducing postoperative pain for laparoscopic colectomy patients. Fifty-five patients scheduled for an elective laparoscopic colectomy were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group L received an intravenous bolus injection of lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg before intubation, followed by 2 mg/kg/h continuous infusion during the operation. Group C received the same dosage of saline at the same time. Postoperative pain was assessed at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery by using the visual analog scale (VAS). Fentanyl consumption by patient-controlled plus investigator-controlled rescue administration and the total number of button pushes were measured at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. In addition, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were checked on the operation day and postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 5. VAS scores were significantly lower in group L than group C until 24 hours after surgery. Fentanyl consumption was lower in group L than group C until 12 hours after surgery. Moreover, additional fentanyl injections and the total number of button pushes appeared to be lower in group L than group C (P < 0.05). The CRP level tended to be lower in group L than group C, especially on postoperative day1 and 2 and appeared to be statistically significant. The satisfaction score was higher in group L than group C (P = 0.024). Intravenous lidocaine infusion during an operation reduces pain after a laparoscopic colectomy.Key words: Analgesics, Colectomy, Pain, LidocaineBecause of a substantial increase in the incidence of benign and malignant tumors of the colon, the number of laparoscopic colorectal surgeries has increased.¹ Laparoscopic colectomy appears to be less painful, involves less bleeding, and has a faster recovery than an open colectomy.² Further, laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been proven to be beneficial in comparison with robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery in many aspects.³ However, postoperative pain because of surgical incision is still an issue that requires resolution. Therefore, various clinical applications such as intrathecal morphine, epidural analgesia, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used to control pain after a laparoscopic colectomy.^4,5 However, optimal management has not yet been established. A regional block can have technical difficulties and complications. The epidural failure rate has been reported up to 40%, and other drugs, such as opioids or NSAIDs, have side effects or drug allergies.^5,6Intravenous lidocaine is inexpensive, easy to inject, and a relatively safe drug.⁷ A number of studies showed that intravenous lidocaine has analgesic, anti-hyperalgesic, and anti-inflammatory properties, as well as a fast recovery, reducing the hospital stay and the time for bowel function recovery.^8–10 In addition, lidocaine in a nontoxic concentration has been reported to decrease the variant volatile anesthesia requirement in an animal study.¹⁰ Therefore, the authors aimed to determine whether a continuous infusion of intravenous lidocaine would have an adequate postoperative analgesic effect for a laparoscopic colectomy. The hypothesis of this study was that an intravenous lidocaine infusion during an operation could decrease postoperative pain.     

The Use of a Circular Side Stapling Technique in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: Experience of 30 Serial Cases

The double-stapling technique using a circular stapler (CS) to create an end-to-end anastomosis is currently used widely in laparoscopic-assisted rectal surgery. However, a high rate of anastomotic failure has been reported. We report new side-to-side anastomosis creation using a CS, the so-called circular side stapling technique (CST). After excising the rectum at the oral and anal sides of the tumor with a linear stapler, a side-to-side colorectal anastomosis was made on the anterior wall of the rectosigmoid colon and the anterior or posterior wall of the rectum with a CS. Between 2012 and 2013, we recorded 30 serial cases of rectal-sigmoid or rectal cancer that were treated with laparoscopic-assisted surgeries using this method. In the 30 cases, the mean age was 68 ± 12 years, operating time was 288 ± 80 minutes, and blood loss was 66 ± 67 mL. None of the patients suffered from anastomosis leakage or postoperative anastomotic bleeding, and none complained of their stool habits. Three months after the last surgery in this cohort, no anastomosis strictures were reported. Based on these results, we propose an alternative method of side-to-side anastomosis for low anterior resection by using a CS to prevent staple overlap. Our experience indicates that the CST is easy and safe. Therefore, this method is a useful alternative to the current method used in laparoscopic surgery.Key words: Laparoscopy, Circular stapler, Colorectal cancer, Low anterior resectionLaparoscopic surgery for the treatment of colorectal disease has proven to be a safe and effective method compared with an open procedure.^1–3 Laparoscopy has the advantages of reduced blood loss, hospital stay, and use of anesthetics as well as a better cosmetic outcome. Although many clinical studies have demonstrated the advantages and low complication rates of laparoscopic colectomy and low anterior resection,^1–5 a high rate of anastomotic leakage has been reported in laparoscopic rectal surgeries. The reported incidence of leakage after laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of rectum varies from 6% to 17%.^1–3 Additionally, anastomotic leakage might raise concerns about local recurrence and may limit the patients prognosis.^6–8 Therefore, despite great advances in laparoscopic surgery, the risks of anastomotic complications persist to a greater extent than those for other colonic resections.^6,7Recent reports have included proposed methods for reducing anastomotic leakage, and recently a transanal drainage tube has been recommended, because the high pressure experienced in the rectum could cause anastomotic failure.⁹ Another group reported the use of anti-traction sutures supporting the anastomosis to reduce anastomotic leakage.¹⁰ Despite these proposals, anastomotic failure has not been completely resolved.In typical laparoscopic rectal surgery, a double-stapling technique (DST) with a circular stapler is used to create the anastomosis. This method is thought to be the only method available to complete an intracorporeal anastomosis of the rectum. However, the DST requires the excision of the stump of the staple line created by the linear stapler. Our previous endoscopic experience with anastomotic leakage shows that leakage occurs frequently at the point where the staples overlap in the DST.¹¹ In this study we demonstrate a new circular side stapling technique (CST), which does not require the excision of the linear staple line in a laparoscopic low anterior resection.     

Usability of Elective Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy and Feasibility of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Sigmoid Volvulus: Report of Three Cases

A therapeutic guideline for sigmoid volvulus (SV) has not been established, and the most recommended surgical procedure for SV has not been determined. Our objective is to assess the usability of elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and the feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for SV following endoscopic reduction. SV typically affects the elderly and accounts for 1% to 7% of intestinal obstructions in Western countries. We report on 3 patients with SV who underwent elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy following endoscopic reduction, and we first describe single-port surgery for SV. We discuss the 3 patients (a 79-year-old male, an 88-year-old female, and a 67-year-old female) with SV who underwent elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy following endoscopic reduction. All 3 patients underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy, and 2 patients underwent single-port laparoscopic surgery without complications. Recurrence of volvulus was not seen during the course of 12 to 24 months. In experienced hands, elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy after colonoscopic detorsion is a valuable alternative, and single-port surgery is also feasible.Key words: Sigmoid volvulus, Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy, Single-port surgerySigmoid volvulus (SV) typically occurs in the elderly and is caused by a redundant segment of colon.^1,2 It is the third leading cause of colon obstruction, after cancer and diverticulitis, and is the cause of 1% to 7% of intestinal obstructions in Western countries.^1–3 Associated morbidity is higher in regions where high-fiber diets are the norm, including Africa, India, the Middle East, and Latin America.^2,4 SV can cause ischemic changes through bowel entanglement with the mesentery,⁵ and if intestinal gangrenous signs are present, urgent surgical treatment is required.For the nonoperative treatment cases, colonoscopic repositioning is extremely useful and common, but the recurrence rate 3 months later for patients undergoing colonoscopic detorsion has been about 45%.^6,7 Therefore, nonoperative treatment should be used primarily to move patients from emergency surgery status to semielective surgery status.⁸Because SV is most common among elderly and frail patients, less invasive surgery is desirable after the urgent situation is addressed with conservative treatment. The laparoscopic approach is a relatively recent technical advance in surgery, with advantages that include lower morbidity, lessened postoperative pain, faster recovery, and improved cosmesis. Therefore, laparoscopic surgery could be a feasible or even preferable alternative for elderly patients. Moreover, reduced-port laparoscopic surgery has proven to be a less invasive procedure, in particular single-port surgery (SPS).We describe 3 instances of laparoscopic-assisted sigmoidectomy for SV after colonoscopic repositioning, including 2 patients who underwent surgery performed with SPS.     

Short-Term Outcomes of Simultaneous Laparoscopic Colectomy and Hepatectomy for Primary Colorectal Cancer With Synchronous Liver Metastases

Although simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases is reported to be safe and effective, the feasibility of a laparoscopic approach remains controversial. This study evaluated the safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic surgery for primary colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases. From September 2008 to December 2013, 10 patients underwent simultaneous laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases with curative intent at our institute. The median operative time was 452 minutes, and the median estimated blood loss was 245 mL. Median times to discharge from the hospital and adjuvant chemotherapy were 13.5 and 44 postoperative days, respectively. Negative resection margins were achieved in all cases, with no postoperative mortality or major morbidity. Simultaneous laparoscopic colectomy and hepatectomy for primary colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases appears feasible with low morbidity and favorable outcomes.Key words: Simultaneous laparoscopic hepatectomy and colectomy, Primary colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases, Short-term outcomeColorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death globally, and 14.5% of CRC patients have synchronous liver metastases that are identified during the diagnostic workup or during the course of treatment.¹ Surgical resection of the primary CRC and synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM) is warranted because this strategy offers the most effective therapy and is potentially curative. However, the optimal treatment schedule and strategy for treating CRC with SCRLM with surgery and chemotherapy remains unclear. Several reports have shown the benefit of simultaneous open resection of primary CRC and SCRLM versus a staged approach.²⁻⁴ In addition, recent improvements in laparoscopic surgery for CRC and liver cancer make this option attractive, and there are several reports of simultaneous laparoscopic colectomy and hepatectomy in the literature.⁵⁻¹⁴ In spite of these promising developments, though, the feasibility of these procedures has been controversial in terms of efficacy, safety, and outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term operative and oncologic outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic colectomy and hepatectomy for patients with primary CRC and SCRLM.     

Fecoflowmetric Analysis of Anorectal Motor Function in Postoperative Anal-Preserving Surgery Patients With Low Rectal Cancer Comparison With the Wexner Score and Anorectal Manometry

The aim of this study was to elucidate whether fecoflowmetry (FFM) could evaluate more detailed evacuative function than anorectal manometry by comparing between FFM or anorectal manometric findings and the clinical questionnaires and the types of surgical procedure in the patients who received anal-preserving surgery. Fifty-three patients who underwent anal-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer were enrolled. The relationships between FFM or the manometric findings and the clinical questionnaires and the types of procedure of anal-preserving surgery were evaluated. There were significant differences between FFM markers and the clinical questionnaire and the types of the surgical procedure, whereas no significant relationship was observed between the manometric findings and the clinical questionnaire and the types of the surgical procedure. FFM might be feasible and useful for the objective assessment of evacuative function and may be superior to manometry for patients undergoing anal-preserving surgery.Key words: Anorectal manometry, Anal-preserving surgery, Fecoflowmetry, Incontinence, Rectal cancerSphincter preservation has been one of the key issues of rectal cancer surgery. Low anterior resection (LAR)¹ and internal and external sphincter resection (ISR and ESR) are anal-preserving surgeries.^2,3 The aim of these procedures is to restore the normal process of defecation, along with its function, and to improve the quality of life of patients by avoiding permanent colostomy. However, anal-preserving surgery is often associated with evacuative dysfunction and various degrees of incontinence.^4–7Most studies that have assessed the evacuation function have used clinical questionnaires, which are subjective and may vary according to the patient perception.⁷ There are many factors that can affect the evacuative function, such as the stool consistency, rectal capacity, anal sphincters, pelvic floor muscles, and intra-abdominal pressure. Although manometry with or without the clinical score has also commonly been used, fecoflowmetry (FFM) has been reported to be more accurate and useful for assessing the postoperative anorectal motor function.^8–13 FFM was first introduced by Shafik and is a dynamic method for examining the anorectal motor activity that simulates the natural act of defecation.¹⁴ Some studies have shown its usefulness in postoperative patients with anorectal disease,^8–11 but only a few studies have been performed to examine the evacuative function following anal-preserving surgery.^12,13 The aim of this study was to evaluate the evacuative function in the postoperative period following anal-preserving surgery in patients with low rectal cancer using FFM, and to compare the results with the Wexner score and anorectal manometry.¹⁵     

Emergency Presenting Colon Cancer Is an Independent Predictor of Adverse Disease-Free Survival

Twenty percent of colon cancers present as an emergency. However, the association between emergency presentation and disease-free survival (DFS) remains uncertain. Consecutive patients who underwent elective (CC) and emergent (eCC) resection for colon cancer were included in the analysis. Survival outcomes were compared between the 2 groups in univariate/multivariate analyses. A total of 439 patients underwent colonic resection for colon cancer during the interval 2000−2010; 97 (22.1%) presented as an emergency. eCC tumors were more often located at the splenic flexure (P = 0.017) and descending colon (P = 0.004). The eCC group displayed features of more advanced disease with a higher proportion of T4 (P = 0.009), N2 tumors (P < 0.01) and lymphovascular invasion (P< 0.01). eCC was associated with adverse locoregional recurrence (P = 0.02) and adverse DFS (P < 0.01 ) on univariate analysis. eCC remained an independent predictor of adverse locoregional recurrence (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.50–3.30, P = 0.03) and DFS (HR 1.30, 95% CI 0.88–1.92, P = 0.05) on multivariate analysis. eCC was not associated with adverse overall survival and systemic recurrence. eCC is an independent predictor of adverse locoregional recurrence and DFS.Key words: Emergency presentation, Colon cancer, Disease free survival, Locoregional recurrenceColorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant cause of mortality, with over 40,000 new cases diagnosed annually in the UK contributing to over 16,000 deaths (Bowel Cancer UK).^1,2 Up to 20% of colon cancers (CC) present as an emergency (eCC) necessitating emergent surgery.^3,4 Although eCC has been shown to be associated with poorer overall survival (OS), much discrepancy exists in the literature regarding its association with disease-free survival (DFS).⁵⁻⁷Studies reporting the oncologic outcomes of CRC presenting as an emergency consist of heterogeneous populations of patients with colon and rectal cancers.^3,5 Colon and rectal cancers are 2 distinct entities with different molecular, clinical, pathologic, and biologic characteristics and treatment modalities.^8,4,9−11 Since the incorporation of combined multimodal treatment and total mesorectal excision the disparity in OS and DFS between colon and rectal cancer has increased.¹²⁻¹⁷ Rectal cancer patients may alter the impression of outcomes in emergency presenting colon cancer. Consequently, previous studies assessing outcomes in eCC may be flawed. Furthermore, the negative impact of eCC has previously been attributed to immediate postoperative complications with an inpatient hospital mortality of approximately 15%. Inclusion of such cases in studies assessing long-term outcomes may have overestimated the negative impact of eCC.¹⁸The aim of the current study was to determine the association between eCC and disease-free/overall survival.     

Medullary Carcinoma of the Thyroid With Axillary Metastasis: A Case Report

We report a case of axillary lymph node metastasis as a consequence of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) in a 42-year-old man. On January 2009, the patient was referred to us for the management of right cervical lymph node enlargement. Total thyroidectomy was performed with right-sided functional neck dissection. Postoperative histopathology revealed MTC in the right lobe of the thyroid, with extrathyroidal extension and right-sided neck metastases. Multiple left cervical, mediastinal, and right axillary lymphadenopathies were detected at the third year follow-up exam. Left-sided functional neck dissection, axillary lymph node dissection, and mediastinal lymph node dissection were performed, and the pathologic outcomes revealed as the metastatic dissemination of MTC. After a disease-free term for 1 year, multiple metastatic lesions were detected in the patient.Key words: Medullary thyroid cancer, Lymph node metastasis, Axillary involvementMedullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a rare tumor originating from the parafollicular C cells of the thyroid gland. MTC accounts for approximately 3% to 5% of all thyroid cancers.¹ The frequently used prognostic markers in the follow-up period of MTC patients are serum calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. Calcitonin hormone is a specific and sensitive biomarker for parafollicular C-cell disorders. The CEA produced by neoplastic C cells is generally considered a marker of dedifferentiation and is associated with worse prognosis for MTC.^2,3 MTC may occur sporadically or may be inherited. Hereditary forms of this cancer account for 25% of all cases and include familial MTC and multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes (MEN 2A, MEN 2B). Seventy-five percent of cases are sporadic.⁴ The overall prognosis of MTC is affirmative, with a 10-year overall survival rate of approximately 95% for patients with tumors confined to the thyroid gland. However, for patients with distant metastasis at presentation, the 10-year overall survival rate is estimated to be only 40%.⁵ For metastatic cases, lymph node involvement is very common throughout the clinical course. During initial staging, the incidence of pathologically proven cervical lymph node metastasis has been reported as 71% to 80%^6–8; the corresponding value for mediastinal involvement is 36%.^6,8 Whereas, distant metastases have been reported in 20% of MTC patients.⁹ Considering the spectrum of MTC, axillary lymph node metastasis (LNM) is rare, and there are reports of isolated cases.^10–12     

Improved Health-Related Quality of Life After Surgical Management of Severe Refractory Constipation-Dominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common of the functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). Despite its prevalence and health-care costs, there are few effective therapies for patients with severe symptoms. Our objective was to determine whether surgical management would improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in severe refractory constipation-dominant FGIDs. From 2003 to 2005, 6 patients underwent total colectomy with end ileostomy or primary anastomosis. They completed Short Form 36 (SF-36) and IBS-36 questionnaires preoperatively and postoperatively. HRQOL was compared with age- and sex-matched Canadian norms using Welch''s unpaired t test. Preoperative SF-36 physical and mental health summary scores were significantly lower than Canadian norms (P < 0.0001), while postoperative scores were not significantly different than Canadian norms (P = 0.50 and P = 0.57, respectively). After surgical management, HRQOL in patients with severe constipation-dominant IBS improved from drastically below that of Canadian norms to a comparable level. This finding questions the convention of avoiding operations in IBS patients and demonstrates that surgical management may be suitable for the appropriately screened patient.Key words: Health-related quality of life, Surgery, Irritable bowel syndromeIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of 20 functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). These are a heterogeneous group of chronic disorders in which the presenting gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms cannot be explained by structural or biochemical abnormalities.^1,2 IBS is characterized by abdominal pain associated with defecation, change in bowel habit, bloating, and distension.^3,4 The ROME III committee developed a set of diagnostic criteria for each FGID separately.^3,4 However, it has become increasingly accepted that the FGIDs overlap considerably and therefore, IBS should not be considered as a single entity but rather on a spectrum of related disorders.^1,5IBS is the most common of the FGIDs with a prevalence rate in the United States anywhere from 3% to 20%, with most studies quoting around 10%.^1,2 Although up to 70% of IBS sufferers in the United States do not seek medical attention, the total health-care costs and burden to the health-care system is substantial.^5,6 In fact, in the United States, among GI illnesses, IBS was second only to gastroesophageal reflux disease in prevalence in a comprehensive assessment of burden of illness.⁵ In addition, the estimated direct and indirect annual health-care costs of IBS in the United States are $1.6 billion and $19.2 billion, respectively.^1,5 Despite the high expenditure for this illness, there are very limited effective treatment options, and patients continue to demonstrate poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL), which is comparable to that seen in patients with organic disease.^1,7–12Treatment options have largely been directed at symptom relief and vary depending on symptom severity. They include any and all of the following: education and reassurance, diet and lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy directed at relief of bowel-specific symptoms with medications (such as anticholinergics, antispasmodics, antidiarrheals, and laxatives), as well as antidepressants and narcotics, along with referrals to mental health and pain services.^2,5,13 A combination of the above therapies has been somewhat effective in patients with mild to moderate symptoms; however, in moderate to severe cases, patients often have symptoms that are refractory and persistent despite exhaustive use of the above modalities.Patients who suffer from severe symptoms of IBS commonly present with a picture of acute severe abdominal and/or pelvic pain and frequently undergo unnecessary emergent abdominopelvic surgeries.^14–17 As the literature would suggest, these surgeries are often nontherapeutic, and thus it is a general convention to avoid operating on patients with IBS and other FGIDs for the purpose of symptom control.^14–17 Nevertheless, there are some motility-disordered patients who have such intractable symptoms as to severely diminish their quality of life. These patients have received operative management aimed at ameliorating their symptoms and thus improving their lives. At our tertiary care center, we have identified a group of such motility-disordered patients. Patient accounts of their disease experience relate severe pain and constipation leading to debilitating loss of daily functioning, emotional distress, disability, and impaired quality of life. The objective of this study was to determine whether surgical management of severe refractory constipation-dominant motility disorders in adult patients would result in improved HRQOL.     

Effect of Intraoperative Valsalva Maneuver Application on Bleeding Point Detection and Postoperative Drainage After Thyroidectomy Surgeries

The purpose of this paper was to analyze the effect of Valsalva maneuver application before finalizing thyroidectomy operations on the identification of bleeding points and postoperational drainage. One hundred patients (age range, 24–76 years) with multinodular goiter, recurrent multinodular goiter, toxic diffuse multinodular goiter, or papillary thyroid cancer were included in the study and were divided into 2 groups of 50 randomly. Both groups underwent thyroidectomy operation, only 1 group received intraoperative Valsalva maneuver application (twice, 30 seconds of 30-cm PEEP). The size of the thyroid gland, the duration of operation, hospital stay, and drain usage were reported. Postoperational occurrences of drainage, hematoma, reoperation, and additional complications were compared between the groups. Valsalva maneuver application helped to identify minor bleeding points in 32% of the cases. There was no significant difference between the study groups regarding the thyroid gland size, operation duration, hospital stay, and the duration of drain usage (P > 0.05 for all). The amount of drainage as well as the frequencies of hematoma, reoperation, and further complications was not significantly different between the study groups (P > 0.05 for all). Intraoperative application of Valsalva maneuver is only useful to detect minor bleeding points in some patients during thyroidectomy operations, but it had no effect on the duration of postoperative drain usage, the amount of drainage, and risk of hematoma. Therefore, intraoperative application of Valsalva maneuver has no beneficial effect on postoperative hemorrhagic complication after thyroidectomy operations.Key words: Drainage, Hemostasis, Thyroidectomy, Valsalva maneuverThyroidectomy is one of the most commonly performed operations worldwide.¹ Though a series of improvements were introduced to the operation process, still several postoperative complications remain to be faced such as seroma, wound infection, skin flap complications, and hematoma.^2,3Despite the richness of the blood vessels in the thyroid area,⁴ the rate of postoperational bleedings thus hematoma events are low (1–5% of the cases).⁵ However, once not controlled, hematoma can result in airway compression and create a life-threatening situation for the patient.⁶ Hence, preventive measures have been emphasized and employed to avoid postoperational bleedings after thyroidectomy. These approaches range from exercises to avoid Valsalva maneuver kind of forces such as coughing or straining at opening bowel⁷ to the use of drains after the operation. However, recent literature indicates that the drain usage does not have a significant effect on the recovery period or on the duration of the hospital stay.^3,5,8,9 Furthermore, it may cause wound infection and contribute to the discomfort of the patients.^5,8,10,11 Thus a proper hemostasis and an early detection of potential bleeding sites are crucial steps for a successful operation and a steady recovery period.⁴ Several techniques have been used to detect and treat bleeding points immediately after the operation to prevent postoperational hematoma. These techniques involve the use of hydrogen peroxide, water in the wound, Valsalva maneuver, and Trendelenburg tilt.^4,7 Recently, the success of Valsalva maneuver and Trendelenburg tilt application on bleeding point detection was demonstrated by Moumoulidis et al.⁴ However, no further information is provided until now regarding the postoperational evaluation of the patients.In this paper, we aim to analyze the effect of the Valsalva maneuver application on the identification of bleeding points before finalizing the surgery and its influence on the postoperative drainage, complications, and recovery process.     

Heterotopic Pancreatic Pseudocyst Radiologically Mimicking Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Heterotopic pancreas is a relatively common variant of foregut embryologic dystopia that can be described as pancreatic tissue found outside the normal anatomic location, being independent from vascular supply of normal pancreas. Having all features of pancreatic tissue except for the major duct structures, this ectopic tissue may be clinically recognized when pathologic changes take place. Inflammation, hemorrhagic or obstructive states, and eventually malignancy-related problems may become a diagnostic challenge for clinician and finally lead to consequences of misdiagnosis. In this article we will discuss a case of heterotopic pancreatic tissue located in gastric cardia, which was diagnosed preoperatively as gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Key words: Ectopic pancreas, Pseudocyst, Gastrointestinal stromal tumor, MisdiagnosisHeterotopic (ectopic) pancreas is defined as the presence of pancreatic tissue in an aberrant site that is not anatomically and vascularly connected to the pancreas proper.^1,2 Ectopic pancreatic tissue is most commonly found in the duodenum (particularly the second portion), ampulla, stomach (prepyloric antrum), and upper jejunum; it can also occur in the liver, biliary tract, Meckel''s diverticulum, and several other sites such as large bowel, spleen, omentum, mediastinum, lung, thyroid, and even brain.^1–6 The heterotopic pancreatic tissue is usually located in the submucosa and/or the muscularis or subserosa.^1,2,4Practically any pancreatic pathology can also occur in the heterotopic pancreatic tissue including acute pancreatitis and neoplastic transformation.^1,4,7,8 Episodes of acute pancreatitis may cause local inflammation and typical pancreatitis-related complications in the host organ. The ectopic pancreatic tissue can lead to ulceration and bleeding in the cases located beneath a mucosa. Being a mass-forming lesion, it may also result in luminal obstruction (particularly in the prepyloric antrum).^1,4Although it is a relatively common congenital anomaly (0.5% to 13% in autopsy series), in most cases heterotopic pancreas remains clinically silent and is found incidentally during surgery or an endoscopic and/or radiological investigation.^1,9 Heterotopic pancreas may be confused with other solid tumors of the host organ.Heterotopic pancreas in the stomach is usually located in the prepyloric area.¹⁰ We report here an unusual case of heterotopic pancreas with a pseudocyst formation in the gastric cardia mimicking gastrointestinal stromal tumor.     

Perioperative Allogeneic Blood Transfusion Is Associated With Surgical Site Infection After Abdominoperineal Resection—a Space for the Implementation of Patient Blood Management Strategies

Allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) has been reported as a major risk factor for surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. However, the association of ABT with SSI in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR) and total pelvic exenteration (TPE) still remains to be evaluated. Here, we aim to elucidate this association. The medical records of all patients undergoing APR and TPE at our institution in the period between January 2000 and December 2012 were reviewed. Patients without SSI (no SSI group) were compared with patients who developed SSI (SSI group), in terms of clinicopathologic features, including ABT. In addition, data for 262 patients who underwent transabdominal rectal resection at our institution in the same period were also enrolled, and their data on differential leukocyte counts were evaluated. Multivariate analysis showed that intraoperative transfusion was an independent predictive factor for SSI after APR and TPE (P = 0.004). In addition, the first–operative day lymphocyte count of patients undergoing APR, TPE, and transabdominal rectal resection was significantly higher in nontransfusion patients compared with transfusion ones (P = 0.026). ABT in the perioperative period of APR and TPE may have an important immunomodulatory effect, leading to an increased incidence of SSI. This fact should be carefully considered, and efforts to avoid allogeneic blood exposure while still achieving adequate patient blood management would be very important for patients undergoing APR and TPE as well.Key words: Colorectal cancer, Abdominoperineal resection, Surgical site infection, Allogeneic blood transfusion, Patient blood managementPostoperative surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent complications associated with various surgical procedures, and it results in adverse outcomes, including longer hospital stay, higher health care costs, and increased surgical mortality.¹ It is one of the most frequent nosocomial complications, accounting for almost one fifth of all health care–associated infections.² Colon surgery and rectal surgery are associated with higher SSI rates compared with most other abdominal procedures, with 5% to 25% of colon and rectal surgery patients developing incisional and organ/space SSI.^3–5 Moreover, the incidence of overall SSI was reported to be higher in rectal surgery patients (17%–28%) than in colonic surgery patients (9%–23%),^3,5,6 with especially higher overall SSI rates observed in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR; 12%–51%).^7–9 These are attributed to the high infection rates of the perineal wound, reported to be as high as 21%.¹⁰ Thus, the incidence of SSI associated with APR should be the highest among the various abdominal operative procedures.Various risk factors for postoperative SSI in colorectal surgery were reported previously. Open surgery,^10–12 perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT),^4,10,12 and prolonged operation time^4,9 have been found to be risk factors for SSI in a number of studies. Although several preceding reports have investigated the risk factors for SSI associated with APR, the reported independent risk factors varied among the studies. Although a number of studies have reported on the role of ABT as a strong risk factor for incisional SSI in colorectal surgery,^13,14 only one study has investigated on its relevance to the onset of incisional SSI after APR procedure; but this study failed to demonstrate a significant association. Presently, therefore, the role of ABT as a potential risk factor for incisional SSI in APR remains to be elucidated, and doing so will be very important for the implementation of measures to achieve patient blood management in this group of patients.In this study, we aimed to elucidate the risk factors for SSI in patients receiving APR, especially focusing on ABT.