Validity of pulse pressure and augmentation index as surrogate measures of arterial stiffness during beta-adrenergic stimulation

OBJECTIVE: Increased arterial stiffness is a determinant of cardiovascular mortality. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a direct measure of arterial stiffness. Aortic augmentation index (AI) and pulse pressure (PP) are surrogate measures of arterial stiffness. Both PWV, AI and PP increase with cardiovascular risk factors. The aim of this study was to test the validity of AI and PP as surrogate measures of arterial stiffness compared with PWV, during beta-adrenergic stimulation with Isoprenaline (Iso). DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 41 healthy volunteers entered a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. In random order, subjects were given intravenous infusion in equal volume of Iso 8 microg/kg per min (dissolved in glucose 5%) and placebo (glucose 5%). A wash-out period of 25 min was observed between the infusions. Measurements included blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), PWV, and AI. PWV were determined using complior (Complior, Artech-Medical, Paris, France). AI and aortic PP were obtained from pulse wave analysis of radial applanation tonometry, using transfer function (SphygmoCor Windows software). RESULTS: Baseline AI increased (P < 0.05) with aging, a lower height and a larger diastolic BP (DBP). Iso increased (P < 0.0001) HR, brachial SBP, brachial and aortic PP as compared with placebo. In contrast, Iso decreased (P < 0.05) AI, brachial DBP, peripheral PWV, but not aortic PWV. Decrease of AI induced by Iso was not related to PWV. In stepwise multiple regression changes in HR, brachial SBP and DBP were independent determinants of AI response to Iso (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that AI and PP fail as surrogate measures of arterial stiffness during beta-adrenergic stimulation.     

Arterial stiffness and central hemodynamics in treated hypertensive subjects according to brachial blood pressure classification

BACKGROUND: International recommendations have classified brachial blood pressure (BP) in subgroups enabling better cardiovascular risk stratification. Central BP is an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk, differing from brachial BP through the predominant influence of arterial stiffness and wave reflections. Central BP has never been studied in relation to international guidelines for brachial BP classification. METHODS: In 580 chronically treated hypertensive subjects we measured: carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), carotid artery augmentation index (AI) and carotid blood pressures, using applanation tonometry and pulse wave analysis, and using brachial BP for carotid pressure wave calibration. RESULTS: For each given brachial value, carotid systolic blood pressure (SBP) and PP were significantly lower than the corresponding brachial SBP and PP. This pressure amplification was significantly lower in the 'optimal' and 'normal' BP ranges (6.8-7.4 mmHg) than in the higher BP ranges (10.1-11.3 mmHg), mainly depending on heart rate (HR) and PWV levels. PWV gradually increased as a function of brachial BP classification and was a significant predictor of this classification independently of age, drug treatment, atherosclerotic lesions and even mean BP. Finally, PWV was a highly sensitive marker of the effective BP control throughout all decades of age. CONCLUSION: Under chronic antihypertensive therapy, central BP does not strictly parallel the corresponding brachial BP classification, depending on differences in aortic stiffness and HR. Whether aortic PWV might predict the brachial BP classification and/or the presence of effective BP control, as suggested in this study, needs further confirmation.     

Ambulatory arterial stiffness index or pulse pressure: which correlates better with arterial stiffness in resistant hypertension?

The ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) is a recently proposed index derived from 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for the evaluation of arterial stiffness. In this cross-sectional study we investigated whether AASI reflects arterial stiffness in patients with resistant hypertension by comparing AASI and ambulatory pulse pressure (PP) with aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), a measure of arterial stiffness, in 391 resistant hypertensives. Clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic variables, 24-h ABPM and aortic PWV (measured using the Complior device) were obtained. AASI was calculated as 1--the regression slope of 24-h diastolic on systolic blood pressure (BP). Statistical analysis involved single and multiple linear regressions to assess the correlations between the two ABPM variables and PWV, both unadjusted and adjusted for potential confounders (age, gender, body height, presence of diabetes, 24-h mean arterial pressure [MAP], heart rate, and nocturnal BP reduction). Ambulatory PP and aortic PWV were independently associated with age, gender, presence of diabetes, and 24-h MAP, whereas AASI was associated with age, diabetes, and nocturnal diastolic BP reduction. PP showed stronger unadjusted (r=0.39, p<0.001) and adjusted (r=0.22, p<0.001) correlations with aortic PWV than AASI (r=0.12, p=0.032 and r= -0.04, p=0.47, respectively). In the analysis of subgroups stratified by gender, age, presence of atherosclerotic diseases and diabetes, dipping pattern, and ambulatory BP control, the superiority of PP over AASI was apparent in all subgroups. In conclusion, 24-h ambulatory PP was better correlated to arterial stiffness, as evaluated by aortic PWV, than the novel AASI, in patients with resistant hypertension.     

Various Approaches for Vascular Health in Elderly Women

Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in elderly women. Several previous studies evaluated various cardiovascular risk factors, such as brachial blood pressure (BP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), pulse pressure (PP), pulse wave velocity (PWV), central aortic pressure (CAP), and so on. More recently, measurement of ambulatory blood pressure (AMBP) was shown to be superior to clinic measurements in predicting cardiovascular mortality. However, the data are limited concerning the relationship among these variables in elderly women. In the present study, the data for clinic BP including PP, PWV, CAP, and AMSBP and AMCAP obtained using BPro were evaluated in 24 elderly hypertensive women. Although there was a significant correlation between AMSBP and AMCAP, no correlations were found between repeated measured values and values measured in the clinic on one occasion. In conclusion, measuring PWV and CAP in the clinic in patients with white coat hypertension or masked hypertension may not be an accurate way to measure these parameters.     

Increased pulse pressure amplification in treated hypertensive subjects with metabolic syndrome

BACKGROUND: Brachial pulse pressure (PP) is physiologically higher than central PP. This PP amplification, which protects the heart from increased afterload, is related to the progressive increase of arterial stiffness along the vascular tree and subsequent changes in pressure wave reflections. The PP amplification increases with high heart rate (HR), which is observed in subjects with metabolic syndrome (MS). The objective of this study was to investigate whether PP amplification is affected by MS and is related to cardiovascular (CV) risk. METHODS: In 613 subjects treated for hypertension (41% with MS) pulse wave analysis was used to investigate carotid blood pressure (BP), pressure wave reflections from carotid augmentation index (AI), and arterial stiffness from aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). The CV risk was estimated from standard Framingham equations. RESULTS: Pulse pressure amplification, HR, and PWV, but not AI, were increased in subjects with MS compared to control subjects without MS with the same age, gender, and mean arterial pressure. The difference in PP amplification between the two groups disappeared after adjustment for both HR and PWV. The AI was the main predictor of PP amplification, representing 28% and 19% of its total variance in subjects without and with MS, respectively. The CV risk for coronary, but not for cerebral, mortality was related to PP amplification. CONCLUSIONS: Although PWV is increased in treated hypertensive subjects with MS, compared to control, PP amplification is increased due to the effect of increased HR and attenuated pressure wave reflections. The observed relation of increased PP amplification with organ-specific CV risk needs further investigation.     

From 'optimal' to 'borderline' blood pressure in subjects under chronic antihypertensive therapy

OBJECTIVES: The ESH2003 report (J Hypertens 2003, 21:1011-1053) has classified brachial blood pressure into six groups reflecting the consistently increasing cardiovascular risk caused by high blood pressure. Chronically treated hypertensive individuals with well-controlled blood pressure retain higher cardiovascular risk than normotensive untreated individuals. Differences between these groups in arterial stiffness, pressure wave reflections and central blood pressure, which are all predictors of cardiovascular risk independently of peripheral blood pressure, have never been studied. METHODS: A cohort of 216 treated subjects with controlled hypertension was compared with 105 never-treated normotensive controls, according to the ESH2003 blood pressure groups. Aortic stiffness (pulse wave velocity; PWV), carotid wave reflections (augmentation index; AI) and carotid pressures were measured non-invasively, by pulse wave analysis. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) amplification between brachial and carotid arteries were estimated. RESULTS: The distribution of subjects in each subgroup of the untreated and treated populations was: 'optimal', 21 versus 43; 'normal', 44 versus 77; 'borderline', 40 versus 96. Brachial blood pressure, carotid SBP and PP did not differ between the two populations, but a constant interaction between blood pressure classification and treatment effect on PWV, AI and blood pressure amplification was found. Compared with untreated subjects, treated subjects had higher AI and lower blood pressure amplification (in the optimal group) and higher PWV (in the borderline group). CONCLUSION: 'Optimal' to 'borderline' blood pressure control in chronically treated hypertensive individuals is associated with impaired properties of the large and small arteries. These results suggest that antihypertensive treatment strategies with more beneficial effects on arterial properties are needed.     

Altered aortic properties in elderly orthostatic hypertension.

To investigate the impact of arterial properties on orthostatic blood pressure (BP) dysregulation in older hypertensives, orthostatic BP dysregulation, a common phenomenon in elderly hypertensives, is associated with target organ damage and falls. However, the mechanism of orthostatic BP dysregulation remains unclear. The pulse wave velocity (PWV), related arterial stiffness, and the augmentation index (AI), a measure of arterial wave reflection, were measured in 365 older hypertensives. We classified the study patients into an orthostatic hypertension (OHT) group with orthostatic increase of systolic BP (SBP) of > or = 220 mmHg (n = 27) and an orthostatic normotension (ONT) group with an orthostatic increase of SBP of < 20 mmHg and orthostatic SBP decrease of < 20 mmHg (n = 338). Orthostatic AI was significantly greater in the OHT group than in the ONT group (OHT: 6.5 +/- 12% vs. ONT: -5.6 +/- 12%, p < 0.001), while supine AI and supine and orthostatic pulse rate were comparable between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the PWV between the OHT and ONT groups. Orthostatic hypertension was affected by altered aortic properties and associated with augmented wave reflection of arterial pressure.     

Visit‑to‑visit blood pressure variability is associated with arterial stiffness in Chinese adults: A prospective analysis

Blood pressure (BP) variability may have its effect on the development of vascular disease. The authors aimed to examine the association between the visit‐to‐visit variability (VVV) of BP and arterial stiffness in Chinese adults. The authors included 1407 participants from a prospective cohort study of community residents who were ≥40 years, without a history of myocardial infarction or stroke, and with data at the baseline, the second and the third visits in 2008, 2009, and 2013. The VVV of BP was defined as the standard deviation (SD), the coefficient of variation (CV), the average successive variability (ASV), and the variability independent of the mean (VIM) in BP levels at the 3 visits. Arterial stiffness was measured by brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity (ba‐PWV) at the 2nd and the 3rd visits. Levels of ba‐PWV change and the occurrence of an elevated ba‐PWV increased significantly in the highest tertile of VVV measures of systolic BP (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) compared with the lowest tertile, respectively. The multivariable regression analysis revealed that VVV measures of SBP and PP were significantly associated with levels of ba‐PWV change and the risks of developing an elevated ba‐PWV. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk were 2.12 (1.57–3.12) and 1.92 (1.38–2.68) in participants with the highest versus the lowest tertile of SBP‐SD and PP‐SD, respectively. No significant association was found for diastolic BP variability measures. The increased long‐term variabilities of SBP and PP were associated with an increased risk of arterial stiffness.     

Indices of pulse wave analysis are better predictors of left ventricular mass reduction than cuff pressure

BACKGROUND: Studies have required large numbers of patients to associate regression of left ventricular (LV) mass with a decrease in brachial cuff blood pressure (BP) in the treatment of hypertension. Hence, we prospectively examined potential superiority of pulse wave analysis over conventional BP measurement in predicting treatment-induced LV mass reduction. METHODS: Forty-six untreated patients (mean age, 56 +/- 7 years) with hypertension received standard medical treatment based on international guidelines. Echocardiography and measurements of various LV load indices were made before and after 1 year of treatment. RESULTS: Antihypertensive treatment significantly (P < .05) reduced LV load, manifest by a decrease in measured brachial BP, estimated aortic BP, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV(cf)), aortic augmentation index (AI(a)), aortic augmented pressure (AugP), and radial augmentation index (AI(r)). These changes were accompanied by significant reduction in LV mass index (LVMI) and improvements in systolic ejection fraction and diastolic early-to-atrial ratio of transmitral flow velocities. The treatment-induced LVMI change was not correlated with changes in brachial BP or PWV(cf), but was closely correlated with factors influenced by wave reflection - changes in AI(a), AI(r), AugP, and aorta-to-arm pulse pressure amplification. On multivariate analysis, AI(a) change was the strongest determinant of LVMI change, independent of brachial BP and PWV(cf) changes (beta = 0.51, P < .001). Estimated subject numbers required for predicting a significant LVMI reduction were far less when wave reflection-related factors were used rather than conventional bracial BP. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that reduction in wave reflection is an important therapeutic strategy for reducing LV mass, which can be predicted with modest subject numbers.     

Central artery pulse pressure in end-stage renal disease: the roles of aortic diameter, aortic stiffness and wave reflection

In elderly subjects and patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), carotid pulse pressure (PP) is an independent and significant predictor of cardiovascular (CV) risk. Whereas in the elderly carotid diameter, but not carotid stiffness, is an associated CV risk factor, an opposite CV risk pattern was observed in ESRD patients that was associated with stiffness. Whether in ESRD patients arterial diameter, stiffness or both are involved in the mechanism(s) of increased carotid PP has never been investigated. Nondiabetic ESRD patients (n = 144) were compared with 57 control subjects matched for age, sex and mean blood pressure, but with higher brachial and carotid PP. Noninvasive echo-Doppler techniques and pulse wave velocity (PWV) and pulse wave analysis were used to evaluate cardiac and carotid arterial structures and functions using multiple stepwise regressions. In controls, carotid PP was associated only with stroke volume, arterial wave reflections and aortic PWV, but not aortic diameter. In ESRD patients, it was associated with wave reflections, aortic PWV, stroke volume and higher aortic diameter. In ESRD patients and controls, elevated carotid PP mainly reflected increased aortic PWV and earlier wave reflections. Aortic diameter had an impact only on ESRD patients, where it compensated for enhanced aortic stiffness and the more pronounced effect of reflected waves. This hemodynamic profile differs consistently from that in elderly subjects of the general population and selectively influences CV risk and drug treatment.     

Differences in pulse pressure day variability between the brachial artery and the aorta in healthy subjects

Objectives

To search for: (i) potential differences in the within-subject pulse pressure (PP) day time variability between the brachial artery and aorta; (ii) the presence of substantial day time variation in the aortic-to-brachial (AtB) PP disparity.

Background

Brachial blood pressure (BP) variability is a risk factor, but also a source of inaccuracy for the assessment of BP-related cardiovascular risk. PP differs substantially in simultaneous measurements at the brachial artery and the aorta; this is of clinical importance regarding accurate cardiovascular risk assessment and reduction strategies. Whether the brachial and the aortic PP time variability is similar, and whether the AtB PP disparity varies during the day is not known.

Methods

In 13 healthy volunteers hourly assessment of brachial and aortic PP was performed (8:00-19:00) under controlled conditions at home.

Results

Aortic PP day variability was consistently and significantly lower than brachial PP (assessed by: standard deviation, variance and time rate variation index, p < 0.05 for all). Individual AtB PP difference (brachial - aortic PP, mmHg) varied substantially within all the 13 subjects; a significant variation during the day in the AtB PP amplification (defined as brachial/aortic PP) was evident (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

By taking into account both time and arterial space, substantial physiological differences in PP variability between the brachial artery and the aorta were observed. These novel findings suggest that non-invasive 24-h aortic ambulatory BP monitoring is warranted in order to significantly improve CV risk assessment and reduction strategies. This possibility must be tested in future clinical studies.     

Reference values for SphygmoCor measurements in South Africans of African ancestry

BACKGROUND: Measurements of blood pressure (BP) together with applanation tonometry at the radial and femoral arteries allow for reproducible assessments of various indexes of arterial stiffness, including peripheral (PP(p)) and central (PP(c)) pulse pressures, peripheral (AI(p)) and central (AI(c)) augmentation indexes, and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). In the absence of an outcome-driven and ethnicity-specific reference frame, we defined preliminary diagnostic thresholds for subjects of African descent living in Africa, using the distributional characteristics of these hemodynamic measurements. METHODS: We randomly recruited 347 subjects from a South African population of African origins. The PP(p) was the average difference between systolic and diastolic BP measured five times consecutively at one home visit. For measurement of PP(c), AI(p), AI(c), and PWV, we used a high-fidelity micromanometer interfaced with a laptop computer running the SphygmoCor software. For analyses we selected 185 subjects without hypertension, diabetes, and previous or concomitant cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: Mean age (33.5 years) was similar in 77 men and 108 women. The PP(p), PP(c), AI(p), AI(c), and PWV significantly increased with age. The 95th prediction bands of this relation at age 30 years, approximated to 70 mm Hg for PP(p), 50 mm Hg for PP(c), 100% for AI(p), 40% for AI(c), and 8.0 m/sec for PWV. The aforementioned thresholds would need adjustment by approximately 2.5 mm Hg, 4.0 mm Hg, 10%, 6%, and 1.0 m/sec, respectively, for each decade that age differs from 30 years. CONCLUSIONS: Pending validation in prospective outcome-based studies 70 mm Hg for PP(p), 50 mm Hg for PP(c), 100% for AI(p), 40% for AI(c), and 8.0 m/sec might be considered as preliminary thresholds to diagnose increased arterial stiffness in young adult subjects of African descent.     

Endothelial function is associated with pulse pressure, pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index in healthy humans

Arterial stiffness is an independent predictor of mortality and is regulated by a number of factors, including vascular smooth muscle tone. However, the relationship between endothelial function and definitive measures of arterial stiffness and wave reflections has not been described in healthy individuals. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that endothelial function is inversely correlated with aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), central pulse pressure, and augmentation index in healthy individuals. Peripheral and central pulse pressure and augmentation index were determined at rest, and global endothelial function was measured using pulse wave analysis and administration of sublingual nitroglycerin and inhaled albuterol. Aortic PWV was also determined at baseline in a subset of 89 subjects. In a separate group of subjects (n=89), aortic PWV was measured and brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation assessed as a measure of conduit artery endothelial function. Global endothelial function was significantly and inversely correlated with aortic PWV (r=-0.69; P<0.001), augmentation index (r=-0.59; P<0.001), and central (r=-0.34; P<0.001) and peripheral pulse pressure (r=-0.15; P=0.03). Moreover, there was a stronger correlation between central rather than peripheral pulse pressure. After adjusting for potential confounders, global endothelial function remained independently and inversely associated with aortic PWV and augmentation index. There was also a significant, inverse relationship between conduit artery endothelial function and aortic PWV (r=0.39, P<0.001), which remained independent after adjusting for confounding factors. In healthy individuals, a decline in endothelial function is associated with increased large artery stiffness, wave reflections, and central pulse pressure.     

Arterial stiffness: Is it ready for prime time?

Recent interest in arterial stiffness as a possible new biomarker of cardiovascular (CV) disease has emerged. Arterial stiffness of the large, elastic conduit arteries is considered a risk marker of vascular aging; it leads to widened pulse pressure (PP) and the development of isolated systolic hypertension in the middle-aged and elderly population. However, increased PP is not always a good surrogate for arterial stiffening because of the frequent discrepancy between peripheral brachial and central aortic PP values caused by varying wave reflection activity. Therefore, noninvasive, easily performed methods for more direct measurement of arterial stiffness, such as pulse wave velocity (PWV) and pulse wave analysis (PWA) have been developed for clinical use. This article asks the question: How useful are PWV and PWA, when compared with traditional measurement of blood pressure components, as biomarkers of CV disease?     

Relation of arterial stiffness to left ventricular diastolic function and cardiovascular risk prediction in patients > or =65 years of age

There is a paucity of data regarding the relation between the various noninvasive indexes of arterial stiffness and left ventricular diastolic function. In 188 subjects aged > or =65 years (mean 75 +/- 5; 71% men), the concordance and strength of the association between measures of arterial stiffness and left ventricular diastolic function were evaluated. Indexes of arterial stiffness (brachial and aortic pulse pressure [PP], carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity [PWV], and augmentation pressure [AP]) were measured using applanation tonometry. Diastolic function was classified in terms of instantaneous diastolic function grade and quantitated as left atrial volume, a measure of chronic diastolic burden. Risk for new cardiovascular events was estimated using a validated clinical echocardiographic risk algorithm. Aortic and brachial PP, PWV, and AP were correlated positively with left atrial volume and diastolic function grade. After adjusting for age, gender, and clinical and echocardiographic covariates, 1-SD increases in aortic PP, brachial PP, PWV, and AP were associated with 6%, 6%, 4%, and 4% increases in indexed left atrial volume, respectively. Similarly, 1-SD increases in aortic PP, brachial PP, and AP were associated with 84%, 81%, and 83% increased risk for diastolic dysfunction, respectively (all p <0.04). PWV and aortic and brachial PP were superior to AP in discriminating subjects with the highest risk of having new cardiovascular events (5-year risk >50%; area under receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.67, 0.67, 0.70, and 0.56, respectively; p <0.05). In conclusion, increased arterial stiffness was associated with more severe left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, although the strength of the association varied according to the specific measure used. Aortic PP, brachial PP, and PWV appeared superior to AP in risk discrimination in this elderly cohort.     

Aldosterone-to-renin ratio, arterial stiffness, and the response to aldosterone antagonism in essential hypertension

BACKGROUND: Some 10% to 15% of hypertensive patients have hyperaldosteronism, an increased ambulant aldosterone-to-renin ratio. As aldosterone reduces arterial compliance, we examined the relationship between aldosterone-to-renin ratio, aortic blood pressure (BP), arterial stiffness, and the effect of spironolactone in a hypertensive population. METHODS: In 24 untreated patients (mean age 51 +/- 2 years, 10 women), we assessed arterial stiffness by augmentation index-height of the late systolic peak in the aorta, pulse pressure (Sphygmocor), and aortic pulse wave velocity (Complior). RESULTS: There were significant positive correlations between the aldosterone-to-renin ratio and aortic systolic pressure, aortic pulse pressure, and augmentation index and negative correlations with pulse pressure amplification, but none with brachial BP or pulse wave velocity. After randomization in a cross-over design to 50 mg of spironolactone or 2.5 mg of bendroflumetazide for 4 weeks with washout period of 1 month, both drugs significantly reduced brachial BP, but only spironolactone reduced (P < .001) pulse wave velocity and augmentation index, which remained significant when corrected for its greater reduction in mean BP. There were significant (P < .001) positive correlations between the ratio and decrease in aortic systolic (r = 0.78), mean (r = 0.75), diastolic BP (r = 0.66), aortic pulse pressure (r = 0.69, augmentation index (r = 0.64) and with, brachial systolic pressure (r = 0.66), brachial pulse pressure (r = 0.44, P < .05) and pulse pressure amplification (r = 0.46, P < .05). Such relationships were not found with pulse wave velocity. CONCLUSIONS: The aldosterone-to-renin ratio may have an important role in determining arterial stiffness, particularly wave reflection and aortic systolic pressure and is of predictive value for the responsiveness to spironolactone. Aldosterone antagonism has BP-independent effects on arterial stiffness.     

Gender influence on metabolic syndrome's effects on arterial stiffness and pressure wave reflections in treated hypertensive subjects

BACKGROUND: In hypertensive subjects, aortic stiffness, an independent predictor of cardiovascular (CV) risk, measured from pulse wave velocity (PWV), contributes to enhance augmentation index (AI), a marker of the timing and amplitude of wave reflections. Whether PWV and AI are correlated and reflect CV risk in hypertensive men and women with metabolic syndrome (MS) remains unknown. METHODS: In a cohort of 613 (364 males) treated hypertensive subjects with and without MS (41% MS) pulse wave analysis was used to determine aortic PWV and carotid AI. CV risk was estimated from standard Framingham equations. RESULTS: In females, but not in males, aortic PWV was higher in subjects with MS, when compared with those without MS (12.7+/-0.3m/s versus 11.1+/-0.4m/s, p<0.001). This result was independent of age and blood pressure. Only in females AI was independently related to the presence of MS; AI did not differ between subjects with or without MS, both males and females. AI did not correlate with PWV, except in males without MS. The overall CV risk was strongly associated to PWV independently of MS and gender, but AI was associated to CV risk only in males. CONCLUSION: In treated hypertensive subjects, the effect of MS on PWV and AI is modulated by gender. The dissociation between PWV and AI observed in women with MS was due to "blunted" wave reflections. This finding is associated with the fact that PWV, but not AI, was a constant marker of CV risk in subjects with MS, whether men and women.     

Spurious systolic hypertension of youth: fit young men with elastic arteries

BACKGROUND: We examined the role of high pulse pressure (PP) amplification in spurious systolic hypertension (SSH). METHODS: We recorded demographic characteristics, brachial blood pressure (BP) (Omron Model HEM-705 CP, Vernon Hills, IL), aortic BP, and arterial wave reflection (Sphygmocor, AtCor Medical, version 6.2, NSW, Australia) and PP amplification in 174 healthy medical students (87 male) and 22 young male hypertensive subjects. RESULTS: Eleven subjects had SSH (147 +/-2 v control 114 +/-1 mm Hg, mean +/- SEM,), normal aortic and brachial diastolic BP with an aortic pressure waveform that was normal in contour and amplitude. All were male, tall, nonsmokers, and active in sports, with slower heart rate, reduced arterial wave reflection (-8 +/- 3 v -0.7 +/-1) and enhanced PP amplification (31 +/-1 v 18 +/-1 mm Hg, P <.01. In contrast, male hypertensive subjects had reduced amplification (14 +/-0.9 mm Hg) and enhanced arterial wave reflection (17 +/-1.9). CONCLUSIONS: The SSH of youth, with raised brachial but normal aortic systolic BP, is commonly seen in tall men who are active in sports and are nonsmokers. It may be explained by the exaggerated first systolic peak in the brachial artery pressure waveform, which is due to very high PP amplification and low arterial wave reflection due to elastic arteries.     

The relationship between aortic augmentation index and pulse wave velocity: an invasive study

OBJECTIVES : The aortic augmentation index (AI) and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) are known to be indicators of arterial stiffness. However, it is not clear whether aortic AI and PWV reflect aortic stiffness in similar ways. We investigated the relationship between aortic AI and PWV by measuring them directly using a catheter technique. DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty-one patients, aged 34-79 years, were studied during diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Aortic pressures were measured using a catheter-tip manometer at two points, one in the ascending aorta and one 40 cm distally in the descending aorta. Aortic AI was defined as the difference between early and late pressure peaks divided by the pulse pressure of the ascending aorta. Aortic PWV was calculated as the distance between the two measuring sites divided by the transit time. We also examined the effects of vasodilatation on AI and PWV by the intra-aortic administration of nitroglycerin in 15 patients. RESULTS: AI was significantly related to age, systolic aortic pressure, heart rate, left ventricular ejection time, and height. Aortic PWV showed an association only with age and systolic aortic pressure. There was no significant relationship between aortic AI and PWV (r = 0.28, NS). Nitroglycerin also produced different effects on aortic AI and PWV: aortic AI was significantly decreased (-0.17, P < 0.01) after nitroglycerin, but PWV remained unchanged (+0.4 m/s, NS). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic AI and PWV cannot be used interchangeably as an index of arterial stiffness. AI may not be a true indicator of arterial stiffness, but an index of wave reflection including PWV.     

Circadian blood pressure variation: relationship between dipper status and measures of arterial stiffness

BACKGROUND: Compared with dippers, hypertensive individuals with a nondipping nocturnal blood pressure (BP) profile have more target organ damage and a worse cardiovascular prognosis, potentially mediated through arterial stiffness. OBJECTIVE: To examine arterial stiffness and dipping in a population of 314 untreated hypertensive individuals, mean age 48 +/- 8 years, 55% men. METHODS: Dipping was defined as a 10-20% fall in nocturnal BP; extreme dipping as greater than 20%, nondipping as less than 10%, and reverse-dipping as 0% at most fall in nocturnal BP. Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) (Complior) and augmentation index (Sphygmocor) were measured. RESULTS: Groups did not differ by age, gender, 24-h or daytime mean BP, body mass index, smoking, cholesterol, glucose, renin or aldosterone. The relationship between PWV and dipper-status was J-shaped, with extreme-dippers and reverse-dippers having the highest PWV. Nondippers and reverse-dippers had significantly higher age and sex-adjusted PWV compared with dippers. Following multivariate adjustment for age, gender, mean arterial pressure, heart rate and smoking, reverse-dippers had significantly higher PWV than either dippers or nondippers (P = 0.005 and P = 0.006, respectively). Dipper status was not associated with augmentation index. CONCLUSIONS: A reverse-dipper pattern, corresponding to the 95% percentile of the night: day BP ratio on ambulatory BP monitoring, identifies a population group with increased PWV. This difference could not be explained by the measured risk factors. Reverse-dippers had significantly less day: night variability in heart rate and wider pulse pressures at night than any of the other groups, suggesting altered sympathetic tone at night as a potential mechanism.