Supervised automated microscopy increases sensitivity and efficiency of detection of sentinel node micrometastases in patients with breast cancer

AIMS: To investigate the practicality and sensitivity of supervised automated microscopy (AM) for the detection of micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from patients with breast carcinoma. METHODS: In total, 440 SLN slides (immunohistochemically stained for cytokeratin) from 86 patients were obtained from two hospitals. Samples were selected on the basis of: (1) a pathology report mentioning micrometastases or isolated tumour cells (ITCs) and (2) reported as negative nodes (N0). RESULTS: From a test set of 29 slides (12 SLN positive patients, including positive and negative nodes), 18 slides were scored positive by supervised AM and 11 were negative. Routine examination revealed 17 positive slides and 12 negative. Subsequently, automated reanalysis of 187 slides (34 patients; institute I) and 216 slides (40 patients; institute II) from reported node negative (N0) patients showed that two and seven slides (from two and five patients, respectively) contained ITCs, respectively, all confirmed by the pathologists, corresponding to 5.9% and 12.5% missed patients. In four of the seven missed cases from institute II, AM also detected clusters of four to 30 cells, but all with a size < or = 0.2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Supervised AM is a more sensitive method for detecting immunohistochemically stained micrometastasis and ITCs in SLNs than routine pathology. However, the clinical relevance of detecting cytokeratin positive cells in SLNs of patients with breast cancer is still an unresolved issue and is at the moment being validated in larger clinical trials.     

Strategies for optimizing pathologic staging of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients

Due to the extensive pathologic evaluation of the sentinel lymph node (SLN), micrometastases are frequently observed. If micrometastases are clinically relevant, the histopathologic examination of SLNs should be sensitive enough to detect them. The probability of detecting micrometastases was calculated when examining the SLN according to the current Dutch pathology protocol and strategies evaluated to optimize the chance of detection. The dimensions of 20 consecutive axillary SLNs in patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer were measured. In a mathematical model, the probability of detecting micrometastases in a SLN was calculated. Similarly, strategies to optimize the probability of detecting micrometastases were explored. When applying the pathology guidelines, the calculated probability to detect a micrometastasis was 18% for a 200-microm micrometastasis and 69% for a 2.0-mm metastasis in a median sized SLN. To detect the smallest micrometastasis in a median-sized SLN with a 95% probability, the interval between the sections must be decreased to 200 microm, and 20 levels from both halves must be examined. Given a prognostic significance of micrometastases, our current pathology guidelines are not sensitive enough. The number of sections should be increased, while the interval between cuts should be no more than 200 microm.     

Non-sentinel lymph node involvement in patients with breast cancer and sentinel node micrometastasis; too early to abandon axillary clearance

AIMS: It has been suggested that patients with T1-2 breast tumours and sentinel node (SLN) micrometastases, defined as foci of tumour cells smaller than 2 mm, may be spared completion axillary lymph node dissection because of the low incidence of further metastatic disease. To gain insight into the extent of non-sentinel lymph node (n-SLN) involvement, SLNs and complementary axillary clearance specimens in patients with SLN micrometastases were examined. METHODS: A set of 32 patients with SLN micrometastases was selected on the basis of pathology reports and review of SLNs. Five hundred and thirteen n-SLNs from the axillary clearance specimens were serially sectioned and analysed by means of immunohistochemistry for metastatic disease. Lymph node metastases were grouped as macrometastases (> 2 mm), and micrometastases (< 2 mm), and further subdivided as isolated tumour cells (ITCs) or clusters. RESULTS: In 11 of 32 patients, one or more n-SLN was involved. Grade 3 tumours and tumours > 2 cm (T2-3 v T1) were significantly associated with n-SLN micrometastases as clusters (grade: odds ratio (OR), 8.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4 to 50.0; size: T2-3 tumours v T1: OR, 15; 95% CI, 2.18 to 103.0). However, no subgroup of tumours with regard to size and grade was identified that did not have n-SLN metastases. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with breast cancer and SLN micrometastases, n-SLN involvement is relatively common. The incidence of metastatic clusters in n-SLN is greatly increased in patients with T2-3 tumours and grade 3 tumours. Therefore, axillary lymph node dissection is especially warranted in these patients. However, because n-SLN metastases also occur in T1 and low grade tumours, even these should be subjected to routine axillary dissection to achieve local control.     

Frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer does not impair the probability to detect lymph node metastases

Intra-operative frozen section analysis (FS analysis) of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast cancer can prevent a second operation for axillary lymph node dissection. In contrast, loss of tissue during FS analysis may impair the probability to detect lymph node metastases. To determine the effect of tissue loss on the probability of detection of metastases, dimensions and tissue loss resulting from intra-operative frozen section analysis were measured for 21 SLNs. In a mathematical model, the influence of tissue loss on the probability to detect metastases was calculated in relation to SLN size for various pathology protocols: an American, a widely used European, the extensive ‘Milan’ and the Dutch protocol. For median-sized SLN 11 × 8 × 5 mm (length × width × height), FS analysis led to a median loss of 680 μm (13.6%) of the height of the SLN. Irrespective of SLN size or used pathology protocol, the probability of detecting 2 mm metastases remained unchanged or even increased (0–12.8%). Moreover, the probability to detect 0.2 mm metastases increased for the majority of tested combinations of SLN size, tissue loss and used protocol. Only when combining maximum tissue loss and smallest SLN size in the Dutch protocol, or when applying the extensive Milan protocol on a median-sized SLN, the probability to detect 0.2 mm metastases decreased by 2.7% and 14.3%, respectively. Contrary to ‘common knowledge’, doing FS analysis of SLNs does not impair the probability to detect lymph node metastases.     

Surgical pathology specimens for gross examination only and exempt from submission: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of current policies in 413 institutions

OBJECTIVE: To survey the scope of current written institutional policies for types of surgical pathology specimens exempt from submission to the laboratory and those that may be examined by gross inspection only. DESIGN AND SETTING: In the first quarter of 1997, a total of 413 voluntary participant institutions enrolled in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes quality improvement program completed a checklist of 115 proffered specimens. Also included was a questionnaire defining demographic, practice, and reimbursement variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number and types of specimens exempt from submission and submitted for gross examination only based on written institutional policy rather than on unapproved actual practices. RESULTS: Most institutions had a written policy for types of specimens deemed exempt from submission to pathology (87.1 %) and for types of specimens subject to gross examination only (76.6%). There was a wide range of numbers of specimen types with a median number of 17 (range, 2-40) in the exempt category and 29 (range, 6-57) in the category of gross examination only. Significantly higher absolute counts of specimens exempt from submission to pathology were reported by institutions with a greater surgical pathology volume in 1996 and by nonteaching institutions. No aspect of practice was associated with numbers of specimens for gross examination only. CONCLUSIONS: This Q-Probes study creates a multi-institutional reference database of current practices to assist pathologists and clinical staff in the development of written guidelines pertaining to surgical pathology specimen submission exceptions and gross-only examinations.     

Sentinel lymph node investigation in melanoma: detailed analysis of the yield from step sectioning and immunohistochemistry

AIMS: To evaluate in detail the extent to which step sectioning and immunohistochemical examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with melanoma reveal additional node positive patients, to arrive at a sensitive yet workable protocol for histopathological SLN examination. METHODS: The study comprised 29 patients with one or more positive SLN after a successful SLN procedure for clinical stage I/II melanoma. SLNs were lamellated into pieces of approximately 0.5 cm in size. One initial haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained central cross section was made for each block. When negative, four step ribbons were cut at intervals of 250 microm. One section from each ribbon was stained with H&E, and one was used for immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: When taking the cumulative total of detected metastases at level 5 as 100%, the percentage of SLN positive patients increased from 79%, 83%, 83%, 90% to 93% in the H&E sections through levels 1-5, and with IHC these values were 83%, 86%, 90%, 97%, and 100%, respectively. One of six patients in whom metastases were detected at levels 2-5 only had metastases in the subsequent additional lymph node dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple level sectioning of SLNs (five levels at 250 microm intervals) and the use of IHC detects additional metastases up to the last level in melanoma SLNs. Although more levels of sectioning might increase the yield even further, this protocol ensures a reasonable workload for the pathologist with an acceptable sensitivity when compared with the published literature.     

Histopathological patterns of melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes

AIMS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an important component in the staging and treatment of cutaneous melanoma (CM). The medical literature provides only limited information regarding melanoma sentinel lymph node (SLN) histology. This report details the specific histological patterns of melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and highlights some key factors in evaluating SLNs for melanoma. METHODS: From 281 SLNB cases between June 1998 and May 2002, 79 consecutive cases of SLN biopsies positive for metastases from CM were retrospectively reviewed. The important characteristics of the SLNs and the metastatic foci are described. RESULTS: The median size of positive SLNs was 17 mm (range, 5-38). SLNs had a median of two metastatic foci (range, 1-11), with the largest foci being a median of 1.1 mm in size (range, 0.05-24). S-100 and HMB-45 staining was positive in 100% and 92% of the detected metastatic foci, respectively. The metastatic melanoma cells were epithelioid, spindled, and mixed in 86%, 5%, and 9% of cases. Metastatic foci were most often (86%) found in the subcapsular region of the SLN. Benign naevic cells were found coexisting in 14% of positive SLNs. CONCLUSIONS: Staining for S100 is more sensitive than HMB-45 (100% v 92%), but HMB-45 staining helped to distinguish benign naevic cells from melanoma. The subcapsular region was crucial in SLN evaluation, because it contained the metastases in 86% of cases. Evaluation of the subcapsular space should not be compromised by cautery artefacts or incomplete excision of the SLN.     

Sentinel lymph nodes for breast carcinoma: an update on current practice

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been established as the standard of care for axillary staging in patients with invasive breast carcinoma and clinically negative lymph nodes (cN0). Historically, all patients with a positive SLN underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The ACOSOG Z0011 trial showed that women with T1–T2 disease and cN0 who undergo breast‐conserving surgery and whole‐breast radiotherapy can safely avoid ALND. The main goal of SLN examination should be to detect all macrometastases (>2 mm). Gross sectioning of SLNs at 2‐mm intervals and microscopic examination of one haematoxylin and eosin‐stained section from each SLN block is the preferred method for pathological evaluation of SLNs. The role and timing of SLN biopsy for patients who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy is controversial, and continues to be explored in clinical trials. SLN biopsies from patients with invasive breast carcinoma who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy pose particular challenges for pathologists.     

Pathologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The identification of lymph node metastases in colorectal resection specimens is necessary for accurate tumor staging. However, routine lymph node dissection by the pathologist yields only a subset of nodes removed surgically and may not include those nodes most directly in the path of lymphatic drainage from the tumor. Intraoperative mapping of such sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) has been reported in cases of melanoma and breast cancer. We applied a similar method to cases of colorectal carcinoma, with emphasis on the pathology of the SLNs. METHODS: Eighty-three consecutive patients with colorectal carcinoma were evaluated after intraoperative injection of 1 to 2 mL of 1% isosulfan blue dye (Lymphazurin) into the peritumoral subserosa. Blue-stained lymph nodes were suture-tagged by the surgeon within minutes of the injection for identification by the pathologist, and a standard resection was performed. Designated SLNs were sectioned at 10 levels through the block; a cytokeratin immunostain (AE1) was also obtained. To evaluate the possibility that increased detection of metastases in the SLN might be solely due to increased histologic sampling, all initially negative non-SLNs in the first 25 cases were sectioned also at 10 levels. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph nodes were identified intraoperatively in 82 (99%) of 83 patients and accounted for 152 (11.9%) of 1275 lymph nodes recovered, with an average of 1.9 SLNs per patient. A total of 99 positive lymph nodes (38 positive SLNs and 61 positive non-SLNs) were identified in 34 node-positive patients. The SLNs were the only site of metastasis in 17 patients (50%), while 14 patients (41%) had both positive SLNs and non-SLNs. Three patients (9%) had positive non-SLNs with negative SLNs, representing skip metastases. In patients with positive SLNs, 91 (19%) of 474 total lymph nodes and 53 (12%) of 436 non-SLNs were positive for metastasis. In patients with negative SLNs, 8 (1%) of 801 total lymph nodes and 8 (1.2%) of 687 non-SLNs were positive for metastasis. Multilevel sections of 330 initially negative non-SLNs in the first 25 patients yielded only 2 additional positive nodes (0. 6%). All patients with positive SLNs were correctly staged by a combination of 4 representative levels through the SLN(s) together with a single cytokeratin immunostain. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative mapping of SLNs in colorectal carcinoma identifies lymph nodes likely to contain metastases. Focused pathologic evaluation of the 1 to 4 SLNs so identified can improve the accuracy of pathologic staging.     

Evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy by immunohistochemistry and multilevel sectioning in patients with breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection for evaluation of the presence or absence of metastatic disease is the single most important prognostic factor for patients with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer. Recently, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is being investigated as an alternative to the evaluation of the entire axilla. We evaluated whether the application of multilevel sectioning and immunohistochemistry in SLNs will increase the accuracy of detection of metastatic deposits. METHODS: Between October 1998 and July 1999, 38 patients with breast carcinoma (25 ductal, 5 lobular, 4 tubular, and 4 mixed ductal and lobular) underwent successful SLN biopsy followed by complete axillary node dissection. Sentinel lymph nodes were localized with a combination of isosulfan blue dye and radionuclide colloid injection. Frozen sections and permanent sections of SLNs were examined. All negative SLNs were examined for micrometastases by 3 additional hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained sections and immunohistochemistry with the cytokeratins AE1/AE3. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph nodes were successfully identified surgically in 38 (93%) of 41 patients. There was a 97% correlation between the results of the frozen sections and the permanent H&E-stained sections. Twelve (32%) of 38 patients showed evidence of metastatic disease in their SLN by routine H&E staining. In 7 (58%) of 12 patients with positive nodes, the sentinel node was the only positive node. The 26 patients with negative SLN examination by H&E were further analyzed for micrometastases; 5 (19%) were found to have metastatic deposits by immunohistochemistry. Of these patients, 2 were also converted to node positive by detection of micrometastatic disease by examination of the additional H&E levels. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph nodes can be accurately identified in the axilla of breast cancer patients. Evaluation of SLNs provides reliable information representative of the status of the axilla in these patients. Immunohistochemistry and, to a lesser degree, detailed multilevel sectioning are able to further improve our ability to detect micrometastatic disease in SLNs of breast cancer patients.     

Micromorphometric features of positive sentinel lymph nodes predict involvement of nonsentinel nodes in patients with melanoma

The aim of the present study was to determine whether micromorphometric features of positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from patients with melanoma are useful for predicting further nodal involvement in completion lymph node dissection (CLND) specimens. Of 986 patients with melanoma undergoing SLN biopsy between March 1992 and February 2001, 175 (17.7%) had at least 1 positive SLN and 140 had subsequent CLND specimens available for review. Further nodal involvement in CLND specimens was present in 24 (17.1%) of 140 patients. Of 8 micromorphometric features of the SLNs that were assessed, the presence of metastases in CLND specimens was correlated significantly with a tumor penetrative depth (maximum distance of melanoma cells from the inner margin of the SLN capsule) of more than 2 mm (P < .05), a deposit size of more than 10 mm2 (P < .01), the presence of melanoma cells in perinodal lymphatic vessels (P < .01), and the effacement of nodal architecture by metastatic melanoma cells (P < .05). Our results indicate that some morphologic features of melanoma metastases in SLNs predict the likelihood of further nodal involvement in CLND specimens.     

Analysis of sentinel node biopsy - a single-institution experience supporting the use of serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry for detection of micrometastases by comparing four different histopathological laboratory protocols

Grabau D, Ryden L, Fernö M & Ingvar C
(2011) Histopathology 59 , 129–138 Analysis of sentinel node biopsy – a single‐institution experience supporting the use of serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry for detection of micrometastases by comparing four different histopathological laboratory protocols Aims: Detecting micrometastases (>0.2 and ≤2 mm/>200 cells) and isolated tumour cells (ITCs; ≤0.2 mm/<200 cells) is important for staging of breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to systematically compare several laboratory protocols used to detect metastases after initial intraoperative frozen section examination. Methods and results: Four different protocols for the work‐up of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) after frozen sectioning were applied in the routine diagnostic process from 2001 to 2009. In addition, team‐work with a limited number of laboratory technicians and pathologists handling SLNs was introduced in 2008. The present study shows that there were, overall, significantly more node‐positive patients in the period when team‐work and intensive step sections including immunohistochemistry (IHC) were used (P = 0.01). This resulted in 13% more patients being found to have ITCs and micrometastases than in a time period when only step sections were performed. No increase in the number of false‐negative frozen sections was seen. Conclusions: Future guidelines for pathological work‐up of sentinel nodes in women with breast cancer might include team‐work and IHC if frozen sections are used intraoperatively.     

Anatomopathological analysis of sentinel and nonsentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: hematoxylin-eosin versus immunohistochemistry

The authors compare the detection of metastases in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and nonsentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs) using hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining versus immunohistochemistry (IHC). Thirty-six patients with breast carcinoma undergo exeresis of the primary tumor and of 50 SLNs and 491 NSLNs. Sentinel lymph nodes are sectioned into transverse slices of 2- to 3-mm thickness, and a cytologic smear and a frozen section were obtained from each slice. The slices are completely cut into serial sections at 100-microm intervals. Two consecutive 4-microm-thick sections are then obtained from each level and were prepared for HE staining and IHC. Nonsentinel lymph nodes are evaluated similarly to SLNs. The authors obtain 4076 SLN sections and 32 012 NSLN sections, for a total of 36 088 sections. A comparison of HE staining versus IHC based on the total number of sections shows a sensitivity of 93.8%, a negative predictive value of 98.9%, and an accuracy of 99.1%. The values obtained by HE staining are similar to those obtained by IHC.     

Comprehensive examination of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer: a solution without a problem?

Although several methods have been devised to examine sentinel lymph node (SLN) specimens in breast cancer, the extent of examination and whether it should routinely include multilevel sectioning to detect micrometastases (MM) (<2.0 mm) is still debated. In this study all "positive' SLN biopsies from 67 consecutive patients with breast carcinoma and evaluated by means of an extended protocol were reviewed. Abnormal findings included micrometastases (MM) between 0.2 and 1.0 mm (14 cases), (MM) between 1.0 and 2.0 mm (8 cases), metastases>2.0 mm (22 cases), and isolated tumor cells (ITCs) (23 cases). The likelihood of finding metastatic deposits was comparable if sections were carried out at 100-, 150-, 200-, 250-, and 500-microm intervals. No metastatic foci>2.0 mm would have been missed. 1 MM (1.1 mm focus) was missed within the 250- and 500-microm levels on hematoxylin-eosin, but not complementary cytokeratin staining. Our data show that SLN step sectioning does not add significant yield if compared to standard examination carried on initial levels, if the minimal target of 1.0 mm micrometastatic deposit is sought.     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结微转移分子检测及其临床意义

目的探讨乳腺癌前哨淋巴结(SLN)定位和SLN微转移检测的临床意义。方法对66例乳腺癌患者行术前Y探测仪SLN定位,用RTPCR法检测SLN中CK19mRNA的表达。同时与常规病检法比较其检测敏感性。并比较转移组、微转移组、无转移组患者的临床病理资料。结果SLN定位成功率为97%,RTPCR法与常规病检法转移的检出率相比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在常规病检阴性的38例淋巴结中,RTPCR法检出8例有微转移。同时乳腺癌转移组与微转移组患者在肿物大小与淋巴管浸润上有相似性,而同无转移组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论RTPCR法较常规病理检查更为敏感,通过SLN定位和RTPCR的联合使用,可明显提高乳腺癌SLN微转移的检出率。同时也证明RTPCR法是可靠的,SLN微转移有可能作为肿瘤预后的指标。     

Histopathological work-up and interpretation of sentinel lymph nodes removed for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

Aims:  To evaluate the work-up of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) removed for vulvar pT1–pT2 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Inguinal lymphadenectomy yields metastases in only 30% of cases. Patients with missed inguinal disease, however, have a risk of dying from systemic disease. SLN dissections reduce morbidity, but work-up should reliably identify metastatic disease.
Methods and results:  All SLNs removed from 38 patients with pT1–pT2 SCC and clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes were submitted for frozen section analysis. When negative, SLN were formalin-fixed, sectioned entirely at 330-μm intervals to produce three slides per millimetre [two haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides; one slide for immunohistochemistry]. If screening of H&E-stained sections was negative, all remaining slides were subjected to immunohistochemistry with an antibody to cytokeratin. Twenty-five of 38 patients (66%) were pN0, 7/38 (18%) had metastases on frozen sections/H&E stains. Immunohistochemistry detected micrometastases in two patients and single tumour cells and anucleate cell structures in four patients. In 12/13 patients the SLN metastases, including all single-cell deposits, were from lichen sclerosus (LS)-associated SCC. Twelve of 13 patients with metastases had a pT2 SCC.
Conclusions:  Micrometastases and single tumour cell deposits in SLNs are typical of LS-associated vulvar SCC. Single tumour cell deposits in SNLs should be regarded as 'positive'. Identification requires serial sectioning and immunohistochemical analysis of all removed SLNs.     

Minimal metastatic disease in sentinel lymph nodes in breast carcinoma: some modest proposals to refine criteria for "isolated tumor cells"

Axillary lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic factors in breast carcinoma. The weight of cumulative evidence suggests that the development of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy procedure has not only allowed for accurate lymph node-staging but has also helped avoid the morbidity of a full axillary dissection in those patients who are unlikely to have metastatic tumor in that location. The detection of metastases in SLNs is facilitated by the, now relatively routine, enhanced histopathologic examination via step-sectioning and immunohistochemistry. In clinical terms, the finding of a metastatic deposit that measures between 0.2 and 2 mm, that is, "micrometastasis" in a SLN is largely noncontroversial; however, the presence of smaller metastatic foci detected either by routine hematoxylin and eosin stain or by cytokeratin immunostain [<0.2 mm, ie, so-called "isolated tumor cells (ITCs)"] has remained problematic since the advent of the SLN biopsy. In this communication, attention is drawn to the broad morphologic range of metastatic disease in SLN that may be placed in the category of so-called ITC. To facilitate the reproducible classification of the various strata of minimal metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes, we recommend the following: (1) the term "isolated tumor cell" (note singular form) be restricted to cases that show the presence of only a single tumor cell. (2) In situations where there are multiple isolated single cells and/or cell cluster(s) present and each cluster measures<0.2 mm, the term "submicroscopic metastasis" be adopted and an actual count of tumor cells present may be given. (3) Restrict the use of the term micrometastasis to cases wherein the largest metastatic focus is larger than 0.2 mm but smaller than 2.0 mm.     

宫颈癌前哨淋巴结活检的假阴性原因分析

目的探讨染料法识别宫颈癌前哨淋巴结（SLN）活检时出现假阴性的原因。方法选择49例早期宫颈癌患者,术前宫颈瘤周注射亚甲蓝,行广泛子宫切除＋盆腔淋巴结清扫术;进行前哨淋巴结定位及病理学检查。结果SLN识别率为87．8％（43／49）,灵敏度为81．8％,准确率为92％,假阴性率为18．2％。结论本组假阴性与肿瘤大小、淋巴转移的途径、术前放疗、病理检测方法有关。     

Implementation of step sectioning in the examination of sentinel lymph nodes to improve the detection of micrometastases in breast cancer patients

The object of this study was to examine whether a new protocol for examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) would lead to the detection of more metastases. Sections of 1 mm would identify most SLN macrometastases, and step sections at intervals of 200-250 μm would identify most micrometastases. A total of 111 breast cancer patients who underwent the SLN procedure at St. Olavs University Hospital in Trondheim, Norway in 2008 were included in the study group. Their SLNs were processed according to a new standardized protocol with sections of 2-3 mm being step sectioned at intervals of 200-250 μm. A total of 109 breast cancer patients undergoing the SLN procedure in 2007 were used as a reference group. Metastases were found in 29% of the cases, compared with 26% in the reference group. Step sectioning of SLNs revealed metastases in five cases initially found to be negative. The metastases of the study group were smaller, with a median value of 1.25 mm compared with 4.25 mm in the reference group. Step sectioning led to the detection of metastases in SLNs initially found to be negative. The median size of the metastases was considerably smaller in the study group than in the reference group.     

Mapping metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer

Localization of metastases within the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) of breast cancer has not been studied. Forty SLNs from 36 patients with operable primary breast cancers were identified by means of lymphatic mapping with patent blue dye. The junction between the patent blue-stained lymphatic vessel draining the tumor and the SLN was labeled with alcian blue. Metastases within the serially sectioned SLNs were assigned to the alcian blue-labeled side, to the opposite side of the virtually halved nodes, or both. Eight SLNs were negative for metastasis. Eleven SLNs had metastases only in the blue half. Only 4 cases had larger metastases in the nonblue half. Metastases are more likely to be located in the vicinity of the inflow junction of the identifiable lymphatic draining the tumor and the SLN. This should be considered when SLNs are examined, especially when they are halved for different studies.