Systemic and Intracranial Outcomes With First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC and Baseline Brain Metastases From CheckMate 227 Part 1

IntroductionIn CheckMate 227 Part 1, nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolonged overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC, regardless of tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Here, we report post hoc exploratory systemic and intracranial efficacy outcomes and safety by baseline brain metastasis status at 5 years’ minimum follow-up.MethodsTreatment-naive adults with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC without EGFR or ALK alterations, including asymptomatic patients with treated brain metastases, were enrolled. Patients with tumor PD-L1 greater than or equal to 1% were randomized to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab, or chemotherapy; patients with tumor PD-L1 less than 1% were randomized to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy groups. Assessments included OS, systemic and intracranial progression-free survival per blinded independent central review, new brain lesion development, and safety. Brain imaging was performed at baseline (all randomized patients) and approximately every 12 weeks thereafter (patients with baseline brain metastases only).ResultsOverall, 202 of 1739 randomized patients had baseline brain metastases (nivolumab plus ipilimumab: 68; chemotherapy: 66). At 61.3 months’ minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolonged OS versus chemotherapy in patients with baseline brain metastases (hazard ratio = 0.63; 95% confidence interval: 0.43–0.92) and in those without (hazard ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.66–0.87). In patients with baseline brain metastases, 5-year systemic and intracranial progression-free survival rates were higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (12% and 16%, respectively) than chemotherapy (0% and 6%). Fewer patients with baseline brain metastases developed new brain lesions with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (4%) versus chemotherapy (20%). No new safety signals were observed.ConclusionsWith all patients off immunotherapy for more than or equal to 3 years, nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to provide a long-term, durable survival benefit in patients with or without brain metastases. Intracranial efficacy outcomes favored nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy. These results further support nivolumab plus ipilimumab as an efficacious first-line treatment for patients with metastatic NSCLC, regardless of baseline brain metastasis status.     

Phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy to primary tumor and metastatic locations in oligometastatic nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients

BackgroundStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a treatment modality in patients presenting with oligometastatic nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SBRT is used as a local consolidative treatment to metastatic disease sites. The majority of patients included in SBRT trials for oligometastatic NSCLC have controlled primary tumors and brain metastases.Patients and methodsOligometastatic NSCLC patients with ≤5 metastatic lesions were included in a prospective phase II trial to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of SBRT to all disease sites, primary tumor and metastatic locations. SBRT to a dose of 50 Gy in 10 fractions was delivered. Positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) was carried out at baseline and 3 months after SBRT to evaluate the metabolic response rate according to PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan–Meier method from start of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Side-effects were scored using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0.ResultsTwenty-six patients received SBRT after induction chemotherapy (n = 17) or as a primary treatment (n = 9). Median follow-up was 16.4 months. Overall metabolic response rate was 60% with seven patients (30%) achieving a complete metabolic remission and 7 (30%) a partial metabolic response. Any acute grade 2 toxicity was observed in four patients (15%) and grade 3 pulmonary toxicity in two patients (8%). Median PFS and OS were 11.2 and 23 months. The 1-year PFS and 1-year OS rate were 45% and 67%, respectively.ConclusionSBRT to all disease sites, primary tumor and metastatic locations, in oligometastatic NSCLC patients produced an acceptable median PFS of 11.2 months.     

Nivolumab Monotherapy and Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the CheckMate 032 Randomized Cohort

IntroductionNivolumab monotherapy is approved in the United States for third-line or later metastatic small cell lung cancer based on pooled data from nonrandomized and randomized cohorts of the multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 trial of nivolumab ± ipilimumab (CheckMate 032; NCT01928394). We report updated results, including long-term overall survival (OS), from the randomized cohort.MethodsPatients with small cell lung cancer and disease progression after one to two prior chemotherapy regimens were randomized 3:2 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Patients were stratified by number of prior chemotherapy regimens and treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review.ResultsOverall, 147 patients received nivolumab and 96 nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Minimum follow-up for ORR/progression-free survival/safety was 11.9 months (nivolumab) and 11.2 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab). ORR increased with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (21.9% versus 11.6% with nivolumab; odds ratio: 2.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.06–4.26; p = 0.03). For long-term OS, minimum follow-up was 29.0 months (nivolumab) versus 28.4 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab); median (95% confidence interval) OS was 5.7 (3.8–7.6) versus 4.7 months (3.1–8.3). Twenty-four–month OS rates were 17.9% (nivolumab) and 16.9% (nivolumab plus ipilimumab). Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event rates were 12.9% (nivolumab) versus 37.5% (nivolumab plus ipilimumab), and treatment-related deaths were n =1 versus n = 3, respectively.ConclusionsWhereas ORR (primary endpoint) was higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab, OS was similar between groups. In each group, OS remained encouraging with long-term follow-up. Toxicities were more common with combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy.     

Combined low-dose ipilimumab and pembrolizumab after sequential ipilimumab and pembrolizumab failure in advanced melanoma

With the wide use of anti-PD-1 therapy, an increasing number of patients progress under treatment. Combined immunotherapy with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies induces higher response rates as first-line treatment in comparison to single-agent therapy, however, with substantial toxicity since the combination of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) and nivolumab (1 mg/kg) induced 55% grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events and treatment discontinuation rates of 39%. In this case series, we investigated the efficacy and toxicity of the combined immunotherapy with low-dose ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) plus pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg) in patients with metastatic melanoma with progressive disease under sequential monotherapy with both agents. All patients had received at least three lines of treatment, 78% of patients were M1c, and 67% had brain metastases. Stable disease was observed in 3 out of 9 patients with a median overall survival of 8 months after double checkpoint inhibition. No treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred, and none of the patients needed to discontinue the treatment due to toxicity. Further trials are needed to investigate combined immunotherapy as rescue treatment in heavily pretreated melanoma patients to find optimal dosage in regard to outcome and toxicity.     

Improved survival and complete response rates in patients with advanced melanoma treated with concurrent ipilimumab and radiotherapy versus ipilimumab alone

There is a growing body of evidence supporting the synergistic roles of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of malignancy. Published case studies of the abscopal effect have been reported with the use of ipilimumab and radiotherapy in metastatic melanoma, but evidence supporting the routine use of this combination of therapy is limited. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate patients treated with ipilimumab for advanced melanoma at a single institution from May 2011 to June 2015. Patients were grouped into those who had received concurrent radiotherapy while on ipilimumab (Ipi-RT), and those who did not. We then evaluated the treatment response following completion of ipilimumab. A total of 101 patients received ipilimumab in the prespecified time frame. 70 received Ipi-RT and 31 received ipilimumab without concurrent radiotherapy. Median overall survival (OS) was significantly increased in the concurrent Ipi-RT arm at 19 months vs. 10 months for ipilimumab alone (p = 0.01). Median progression free survival (PFS) was marginally increased in the Ipi-RT group compare with the ipilimumab alone group (5 months vs. 3 months, p = 0.20). Rates of complete response (CR) were significantly increased in the Ipi-RT group vs. ipilimumab alone (25.7% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.04), and rates of overall response (OR) in the groups were 37.1% vs. 19.4% (p = 0.11). No increase in toxicities was observed in the Ipi-RT group compare with ipilimumab alone. Prospective trials are needed to further clarify the role of radiotherapy with ipilimumab, but these encouraging preliminary observations suggest that this combination can induce more durable responses to immunotherapy.     

CheckMate 73L: A Phase 3 Study Comparing Nivolumab Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Durvalumab for Previously Untreated,Locally Advanced Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionThe 5 year survival rate for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) not amenable for definitive resection with historical standard-of-care concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) ranges from 15% to 32%. cCRT primes anti-tumor immunity and also upregulates programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), providing a rationale for combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with cCRT to improve outcomes. In the PACIFIC trial, consolidation therapy with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) vs. placebo in patients with stage III NSCLC who did not have disease progression after cCRT. CheckMate73L (NCT04026412), a randomized phase 3 study, evaluates the efficacy of nivolumab plus cCRT followed by nivolumab with or without ipilimumab vs. cCRT followed by durvalumab for untreated, stage III NSCLC.Patients and MethodsPatients with untreated, stage III NSCLC will be randomized 1:1:1 to nivolumab plus cCRT followed by nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab (Arm A) or nivolumab alone (Arm B); or cCRT followed by durvalumab (Arm C). Primary endpoints are PFS and OS (Arm A vs. Arm C). Secondary endpoints include additional analyses of PFS and OS (Arm A vs. Arm B; Arm B vs. Arm C), as well as objective response rate, complete response rate, time to response, duration of response, time to death or distant metastases, and safety and tolerability. Recruitment began on August 20, 2019, and the estimated primary completion date is October 17, 2022.     

Restoring Immune Mediated Disease Control by Ipilimumab Re-exposition in a Heavily pretreated Patient With MSI-H mCRC

BackgroundImmune-Checkpoint-inhibitors (ICIs) are approved in first line therapy of microsatellite-instable, deficient miss-match-repair (MSI-H-dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and in second line after standard chemotherapy. Evidence supporting immunotherapy after immunotherapy is scarce.Case reportThis case report highlights the course of a heavily pretreated patient with MSI-H mCRC with progression after multiple local therapies, standard chemotherapies and pembrolizumab. After 4 cycles of ipilimumab and nivolumab followed by nivolumab-maintenance he achieved a long-lasting disease control of 22 months. After further subsequent progression he regained immune mediated disease control by a second “boost” of ipilimumab.ConclusionRe-exposition with ipilimumab is a potential option to restore immune-mediated-disease-control in patients with preceding long-lasting response to ipilimumab/nivolumab and with dMMR-tumors. The clinical situation of progress after long-lasting disease control on ICIs becomes more common and is an opportunity to investigate potential strategies for restoring immune mediated disease control.     

First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab With Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Metastatic NSCLC in CheckMate 9LA: 3-Year Clinical Update and Outcomes in Patients With Brain Metastases or Select Somatic Mutations

IntroductionIn the phase 3 CheckMate 9LA study, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy prolonged overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy alone. We report updated efficacy and safety (≥3 y of follow-up), clinical outcomes in patients with baseline brain metastases, and exploratory somatic mutation analyses.MethodsAdults with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC, no known sensitizing EGFR or ALK alterations, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 1 were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks with chemotherapy (two cycles) or chemotherapy alone (four cycles). Assessments included OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate. Exploratory analyses included systemic and intracranial efficacy in patients with or without baseline brain metastases, in addition to OS and PFS by KRAS, TP53, STK11, and KEAP1 somatic mutation status in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC.ResultsWith a minimum follow-up of 36.1 months, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy continued to prolong OS versus chemotherapy alone in the intent-to-treat population (median [hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval] OS: 15.8 versus 11.0 mo [0.74; 0.62–0.87]; 3-y OS: 27% versus 19%). Efficacy outcomes were improved in patients with pretreated baseline brain metastases (median [hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval] OS: 19.3 versus 6.8 mo [0.45; 0.29–0.70]; systemic PFS: 9.7 versus 4.1 mo [0.44; 0.28–0.69]; intracranial PFS: 11.4 versus 4.6 mo [0.42; 0.26–0.68]). A trend of OS benefit was observed in patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, despite KRAS, TP53, and STK11 tumor mutations. Extended follow-up revealed no new safety signals.ConclusionsWith a 3-year minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy continued to have long-term, durable efficacy versus chemotherapy alone; a manageable safety profile; and survival benefit in patients with or without baseline brain metastases or select somatic mutations, further supporting the regimen as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic NSCLC.     

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Salvage Treatment of Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PurposeThis study analyzes the outcomes and toxicity of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as salvage treatment for recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods and MaterialsThis retrospective analysis considered patients treated with thoracic SBRT and a history of prior external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), SBRT, or surgical resection for NSCLC. Follow-up included positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging at 2- to 3-month intervals. Key outcomes were presented with the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsForty patients with 52 treatments were included at a mean of 11.82 months after treatment with EBRT (n = 21), SBRT (n = 15), surgical resection (n = 9), and SBRT after EBRT (n = 7). Median imaging and clinical follow-up were 13.39 and 19.01 months, respectively. SBRT delivered a median dose of 40 Gy in 4 fractions. Median biologically effective dose (BED) was 79.60 Gy. Median gross tumor volume and planning target volume were 10.80 and 26.25 cm³, respectively. Local control was 65%, with a median time to local failure of 13.52 months. Local control was 87% after previous SBRT but only 33% after surgery. Median overall survival was 24.46 months, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.11 months. Patients presenting after previous SBRT had improved local control (P = .021), and the same result was obtained including patients with SBRT after EBRT (P = .0037). Treatments after surgical resection trended toward worse local control (P = .061). Patients with BED ≥80 Gy had improved local PFS (P = .032), PFS (P = .021), time without any treatment failure (P = .033), and time to local failure (P = .041). Using the Kaplan–Meier method, BED ≥80 Gy was predictive of improved local PFS (P = .01) and PFS (P < .005). Toxicity consisted of 10 instances of grade <3 toxicity (16%) and no grade ≥3 toxicity.ConclusionsSalvage treatment for recurrent NSCLC with SBRT was effective and well tolerated, particularly after initial treatment with SBRT. When possible, salvage SBRT should aim to achieve a BED of ≥80 Gy.     

Safety and Clinical Activity of Atezolizumab Plus Ipilimumab in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From a Phase 1b Trial

BackgroundThis phase 1b study investigated safety and activity of combined checkpoint inhibition (CPI) with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody atezolizumab plus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor ipilimumab in NSCLC.Patients and MethodsEligible patients had previously treated locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma. A standard 3+3 dose escalation investigated atezolizumab (600-1200 mg IV every 3 weeks) plus ipilimumab starting at 1 mg/kg, administered as a single dose or 4 doses, administered every 3 weeks. The expansion stage included a cohort previously treated with atezolizumab. Patients were monitored for safety and tolerability; response was evaluated every 6 weeks.ResultsTwenty-seven patients were enrolled, 4 with melanoma and 23 with NSCLC; here, we focus on data for the NSCLC population. Three of 23 patients (13.0%) received prior CPI. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported during dose escalation; dose expansion occurred with atezolizumab 1200 mg plus 1 cycle of ipilimumab 1 mg/kg. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events were dyspnea (39%) and cough (35%); treatment-related Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 11 patients (48%), most frequently pneumonitis (17%) and amylase or lipase elevation (9% each). Six of 23 NSCLC patients (26%) achieved confirmed responses, 5 of whom (25%) were CPI naive. Median duration of response was 23.0 (95% CI, 3.2-36.9) months overall and 36.9 (95% CI, 2.9-36.9) months in CPI-naive patients.ConclusionPreliminary efficacy of atezolizumab plus ipilimumab was observed in metastatic NSCLC. The combination had manageable toxicity, with a safety profile consistent with those of the individual agents.     

Neurotoxicity from immune-checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of melanoma: a single centre experience and review of the literature

BackgroundTreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) has greatly improved survival for patients with advanced melanoma in recent years. Anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD1 antibodies have been approved following large Phase III trials. Immune-related neurological toxicity of varying severity has been reported in the literature. The cumulative incidence of neurotoxicity among ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab is reported as <1% in published clinical trials. We aimed to identify the incidence of neurotoxicity in our institution across anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies, including the combination of ipilimumab with nivolumab. We also review the existing literature and propose an investigation and management algorithm.MethodsAll patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab or the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi + nivo), managed at the Royal Marsden Hospital between September 2010 and December 2015, including patients on (published) clinical trials were included. Medical records for each patient were reviewed and information on neurotoxicity recorded. A systematic search strategy was performed to collate existing reports of neurological toxicity.ResultsIn total, 413 immunotherapy treatment episodes in 352 patients were included, with median follow-up of 26.7 months. Ten cases of neurotoxicity were recorded, affecting 2.8% of patients overall, ranging from grade 1 to 4, affecting both central and peripheral nervous systems. A rate of 14% was noted with ipi + nivo. Three of five patients commenced on corticosteroids responded to these. Six patients had made a full recovery at the time of reporting. A favorable radiological response was found in 7 of the 10 cases. Unusual presentations are described in detail.ConclusionsNeurological toxicity is not uncommon, and may be more frequent in patients treated with combination ipi + nivo. Patterns of presentation and response to treatment are varied. A prompt and considered approach is required to optimize outcomes in this group of patients.     

CCTG BR34: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab With or Without Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC

IntroductionFirst-line therapy for patients with metastatic NSCLC includes checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy, dual checkpoint inhibition, or combination with chemotherapy. We compared outcomes with combination chemoimmunotherapy versus dual checkpoint inhibition as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic NSCLC.MethodsThis open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted at 44 sites in Canada and Australia. Patients with treatment-naive, metastatic NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR or ALK alterations were randomized (1:1) to receive treatment with durvalumab plus tremelimumab with or without platinum-doublet chemotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall response rate, and safety.ResultsA total of 301 patients were randomized. Median OS was 16.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.6–19.1) with chemotherapy plus immunotherapy and 14.1 months (95% CI: 10.6–18.3) with immunotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.88, 90% CI: 0.67–1.16, p = 0.46). Median progression-free survival with chemotherapy plus immunotherapy was 7.7 months (95% CI: 5.5–8.5) and 3.2 months (95% CI: 2.7–5.1) with immunotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52–0.88). The overall response rate with chemoimmunotherapy was 42.4% and 29.3% with immunotherapy (adjusted OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.04–2.76). The percentage of patients with grade 3 or higher adverse events was 82% in the chemotherapy plus immunotherapy group and 70% in the immunotherapy group. Exploratory analyses of programmed death-ligand 1 expression and blood-based tumor mutation burden revealed no differential treatment effect on OS.ConclusionsThe addition of chemotherapy to durvalumab plus tremelimumab in the first-line treatment of stage IV NSCLC did not improve survival compared with durvalumab plus tremelimumab alone. Further study is warranted to identify patients that benefit from initial immunotherapy alone versus combination chemotherapy plus immunotherapy as first-line treatment.     

A Multicenter,Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Platinum Combination Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab With Platinum Combination Chemotherapy Plus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Treatment-Naive Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Gene Alterations: JCOG2007 (NIPPON Study)

BackgroundFirst-line treatment of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a paradigm shift to platinum combination chemotherapy together with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, regardless of the expression level of the programmed cell death–1 (PD-1) ligand PD-L1 on tumor cells. Moreover, such chemotherapy plus nivolumab (antibody to PD-1) and ipilimumab (antibody to cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein–4) prolonged survival in advanced NSCLC patients compared with chemotherapy alone. We have now designed a randomized, controlled phase III trial (NIPPON, JCOG2007) to confirm that platinum combination chemotherapy plus nivolumab and ipilimumab is superior to such chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab (antibody to PD-1) for treatment-naive patients with advanced NSCLC.Patients and MethodsChemotherapy-naïve patients aged 20 years or older with a performance status of 0 or 1 are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive platinum combination chemotherapy and either pembrolizumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Patients with known genetic driver alterations such as those affecting EGFR or ALK are excluded. Enrollment of 422 patients over 3 years at 55 oncology facilities throughout Japan is planned. The primary endpoint is overall survival. In addition, as ancillary research, metagenomic analysis of the gut microbiota will be performed with fecal samples collected before treatment onset, and the results will be examined for their association to therapeutic effect and adverse events.ConclusionIf the primary endpoint is met, platinum combination chemotherapy together with nivolumab plus ipilimumab will be established as a new, more effective standard treatment for advanced NSCLC.     

Survival Outcomes Following Discontinuation of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab for Advanced Melanoma in a Population-based Cohort

AimsInduction ipilimumab and nivolumab followed by maintenance nivolumab improve overall survival compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma, but immune-related adverse events (irAE) occur commonly. The need for induction discontinuation because of irAE and the relationship between irAE and survival in non-trials patients are unclear.Materials and methodsPatients with unresectable stage III–IV melanoma receiving first-line combination immunotherapy at one of six centres between December 2017 and February 2020 outside of trials were identified retrospectively. Landmark 12-week Kaplan–Meier analyses and log-rank tests were used to evaluate associations between discontinuation of induction therapy on overall survival and time to treatment failure (TTF). Multivariable analysis of factors influencing overall survival and TTF was undertaken.ResultsAmong 95 patients, the median age was 62 years, 38.9% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥1 and 22.1% had brain metastases. The median follow-up for the whole cohort was 19.8 months by the reverse Kaplan–Meier method. Any grade and grade 3–4 irAE were noted in 78.9% and 44.2% of the cohort, respectively. 44.2% of patients completed induction immunotherapy, whereas 41.1% did not due to irAE. Twelve-week landmark overall survival and TTF were similar in patients who completed induction versus those who did not due to irAE. On multivariable analysis, any grade irAE (versus none) was associated with longer overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.15–0.82, P = 0.02) and TTF (hazard ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval = 0.17–0.81, P = 0.01). Grade 3–4 irAE correlated with longer TTF (hazard ratio = 0.45, 95% confidence interval = 0.20–1.01, P = 0.05).ConclusionIn this population-based cohort, discontinuation of induction immunotherapy as a result of irAE did not adversely affect overall survival or TTF. irAE observed during ipilimumab and nivolumab induction were associated with improved survival outcomes.     

Ipilimumab alone or in combination with nivolumab after progression on anti-PD-1 therapy in advanced melanoma

BackgroundThe anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab have shown improved objective response rates and progression-free survival compared to ipilimumab only in advanced melanoma patients. Anti-PD-1 therapy demonstrated nearly equal clinical efficacy in patients who had progressed after ipilimumab or were treatment-naïve. However, only limited evidence exists regarding the efficacy of ipilimumab alone or in combination with nivolumab after treatment failure to anti-PD-therapy.Patients and methodsA multicenter retrospective study in advanced melanoma patients who were treated with nivolumab (1 or 3 mg/kg) and ipilimumab (1 mg or 3 mg/kg) or ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) alone after treatment failure to anti-PD-1 therapy was performed. Patient, tumour, pre- and post-treatment characteristics were analysed.ResultsIn total, 47 patients were treated with ipilimumab (ipi-group) and 37 patients with ipilimumab and nivolumab (combination-group) after treatment failure to anti-PD-1 therapy. Overall response rates for the ipi- and the combination-group were 16% and 21%, respectively. Disease control rate was 42% for the ipi-group and 33% for the combination-group. One-year overall survival rates for the ipi- and the combination-group were 54% and 55%, respectively.ConclusionsIpilimumab should be considered as a viable treatment option for patients with failure to prior anti-PD-1 therapy, including those with progressive disease as best response to prior anti-PD-1. In contrast, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab appears significantly less effective in this setting compared to treatment-naïve patients.     

Salvage Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Isolated Local Recurrence After Primary Surgical Resection of Non–small-cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionWe sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as salvage treatment for local recurrence after prior surgical resection for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and MethodsWe surveyed our prospective lung SBRT registry for patients who received salvage SBRT (sSBRT) for local recurrence after previous resection of a primary NSCLC. Following sSBRT, local control, distant metastases, overall survival, and treatment-related toxicity were evaluated.ResultsFrom 2004 to 2017, 48 patients met inclusion criteria. At initial surgery, 44 (83%) patients had stage I to II disease, and surgical approaches were 47.9% wedge resection, 4.2% segmentectomy, 43.8% lobectomy, and 4.2% bilobectomy. The median time to local recurrence after surgery was 26.4 months, and 36 (75%) recurrences were biopsy-proven. Surgical salvage was not possible owing to un-resectability or underlying comorbidities in 45 (93.8%) patients. Most (68.8%) patients received 50 Gy in 5 fractions. The median follow-up after sSBRT was 22.6 months (range, 3.8-108.8 months). Eight (16.7%) patients experienced local or lobar failure, and 9 (19.1%) patients had nodal failure at a median of 12.5 months (range, 2-66.1 months). Nineteen (39.6%) patients failed distantly at a median of 11.4 months. The median overall survival after sSBRT was 29.3 months. A total of 72.9% of patients experienced no toxicity after sSBRT. Three (6.3%) patients developed grade III toxicity (cough, atelectasis, or soft tissue necrosis) following sSBRT.ConclusionsSimilar to SBRT for primary early stage NSCLC, sSBRT for local relapse following surgical resection of NSCLC offers high rates of local control with limited toxicity. Distant failure remains the primary pattern of failure.     

Clinical Outcomes and Safety Profile in the Treatment of Synchronous Nonmetastatic Lung Tumors With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PurposeStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has increasingly been used to treat early-stage primary lung cancers, but its effectiveness and safety in patients with multiple synchronous primary lung tumors is not as well established. Our aim was to evaluate clinical outcomes, patterns of recurrence, and toxicities for these patients.Methods and MaterialsWe queried an institutional database of patients treated with SBRT for primary lung tumors from 2007 to 2019. Patients with known metastatic disease were excluded. Recurrences were described as new primaries (NP) if they occurred as an isolated pulmonary mass outside the previous planning target volume.ResultsWe analyzed 126 lesions from 60 consecutive patients who received SBRT synchronously to ≥2 lesions for nonmetastatic lung cancers. Median total dose per lesion was 50 Gy (range, 30-60 Gy) delivered over 3 to 5 fractions. All but 4 lesions were treated to a biologically effective dose ≥100 Gy. The median follow-up time was 47.3 months (interquartile range, 34.1-65.6). Median overall survival was 46.2 months. Two and 5-year overall survival for all patients was 70% and 48%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 26 months (interquartile range, 7.6-32.6), and at the time of data collection 25 patients (42%) had experienced any disease progression. Median time to progression was 36 months: 9 (15%) patients experienced local failure, with 1- and 2-year local failure rates of 8% and 13%, respectively. Four patients (7%) experienced regional failure, at 3, 10, 30, and 50 months. Eleven patients (18%) experienced distant failure, with 2-year distant failure rate of 13%. Thirteen patients (21%) developed NPs, with 2-year NP rate of 15.1%. Fourteen patients (23%) experienced Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥2 toxicity, and 2 patients (3%) experienced Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3 toxicity (pneumonitis and hemoptysis).ConclusionsSynchronous SBRT to biologically effective dose ≥100 Gy appears safe and effective for selected patients with synchronous primary lung tumors.     

Activity of Nivolumab and Utility of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictive Biomarker for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study

BackgroundThe immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab is entering routine oncologic practice. We investigated the safety and efficacy of nivolumab in the real world and alternative predictive factors for survival in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and MethodsWe performed a prospective observational study to evaluate the activity of nivolumab treatment for chemotherapy-refractory NSCLC. Patients were treated with nivolumab once every 2 weeks, and the efficacy was assessed every 8 ± 2 weeks.ResultsFifty-two patients were enrolled after nivolumab approval in Japan. These patients received a median of 4 (range, 1-43) cycles of nivolumab. Overall objective response was observed in 12 patients (23.1%). Median progression-free survival was 2.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.2) months, and 1-year overall survival rate was 59.9%. A total of 23 immune-related adverse events occurred in 20 patients, as follows: 7 cases of pneumonitis, 6 of oral mucositis, 5 of hypothyroidism, 2 of colitis, 2 of liver dysfunction, and 1 of arthritis. All patients recovered after appropriate management. A pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of ≥ 5 was significantly associated with poor prognosis compared to NLR < 5 (hazard ratio, 4.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.84-11.14; P = .013), independently.ConclusionNivolumab showed promising activity with a manageable safety profile in clinical practice, consistent with effects of previous clinical trials. This drug could affect a specific population of patients with advanced NSCLC, and pretreatment NLR was a candidate for surrogate markers for survival benefit of patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab.