Three-Year Safety,Tolerability, and Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes of Adjuvant Osimertinib in Patients With Resected Stage IB to IIIA EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Updated Analysis From the Phase 3 ADAURA Trial

IntroductionIn ADAURA, adjuvant osimertinib significantly improved disease-free survival versus placebo in resected stage IB to IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC. We report in-depth analyses of three-year safety, tolerability, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from ADAURA.MethodsPatients were randomized 1:1 to osimertinib 80 mg or placebo once daily for up to 3 years. Safety assessments were performed at baseline, week 2, week 4, week 12, and every 12 weeks until treatment completion or discontinuation, and 28 days after treatment was stopped. The SF-36 survey measured HRQoL at baseline, week 12, week 24, and every 24 weeks until recurrence, treatment completion or discontinuation. Data cutoff: April 11, 2022.ResultsSafety and HRQoL analysis sets: osimertinib, n = 337 and n = 339; placebo, n = 343 each. Median (range) total exposure duration was longer with osimertinib versus placebo: 35.8 (0–38) versus 25.1 (0–39) months. Most adverse events (AEs) were first reported within 12 months of starting treatment (osimertinib 97%, placebo 86%). AEs leading to dose reduction, interruption or discontinuation were reported in 12%, 27% and 13% respectively of patients with osimertinib; 1%, 13% and 3% with placebo. Stomatitis and diarrhea were the most common AEs leading to osimertinib dose reduction or interruption; interstitial lung disease was the most common leading to osimertinib discontinuation (per protocol). There were no differences in time to deterioration for SF-36 physical, mental component summaries between osimertinib and placebo.ConclusionsNo new safety signals were reported and HRQoL was maintained with 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib treatment. Combined with significant efficacy benefit, these data further support adjuvant osimertinib in stage IB to IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC.     

Adjuvant Osimertinib vs. Placebo in Completely Resected Stage IA2–IA3 EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: ADAURA2

IntroductionOsimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible, oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that potently and selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations, with demonstrated efficacy in EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm) non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Here we present the rationale and study design for ADAURA2 (NCT05120349), which will evaluate adjuvant osimertinib vs. placebo in patients with stage IA2–IA3 EGFRm NSCLC, following complete tumor resection.Patients and MethodsADAURA2 is a phase III, global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients will be adults aged ≥18 years with resected primary nonsquamous NSCLC stage IA2 or IA3 and central confirmation of an EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation. Patients will be stratified by pathologic risk of disease recurrence (high vs. low), EGFR mutation type (exon 19 deletion vs. L858R) and race (Chinese Asian vs. non-Chinese Asian vs. non-Asian), and randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib 80 mg once daily (QD) or placebo QD until disease recurrence, treatment discontinuation, or a maximum treatment duration of 3 years. The primary endpoint of this study is disease-free survival (DFS) in the high-risk stratum. Secondary endpoints include DFS in the overall population, overall survival, CNS DFS, and safety. Health-related quality of life and pharmacokinetics will also be evaluated.ResultsStudy enrolment began in February 2022 and interim results of the primary endpoint are expected in August 2027.     

Longitudinal Monitoring of Circulating Tumor DNA From Plasma in Patients With Curative Resected Stages I to IIIA EGFR-Mutant Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionFor patients with early stage EGFR-mutant–positive (EGFR-M+) NSCLC, curative surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is considered the standard of care. This study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of longitudinal monitoring of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a valuable biomarker for early detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) and provides identification of the group at high risk for recurrence in resected stages I to IIIA EGFR-M+ NSCLC.MethodsBetween August 2015 and October 2017, a total of 278 patients with curative resected, stages I to IIIA (American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh version) common EGFR-M+ NSCLC were analyzed. Radiological follow-up was accompanied with longitudinal monitoring of ctDNA using a droplet-digital polymerase chain reaction from baseline (preoperative), 4 weeks after curative surgery, and follow-up per protocol until 5 years. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) according to the status of ctDNA positivity at landmark points and the sensitivity of longitudinal monitoring of ctDNA.ResultsAmong 278 patients, preoperative baseline ctDNA was detected in 67 (24%) patients: 23% (stage IA), 18% (IB), 18% (IIA), 50% (IIB), and 42% (IIIA) (p = 0.06). Of patients with baseline ctDNA, 76% (51 of 67) had clearance at 4 weeks after surgery (postoperative). Patients were classified into the following three groups; group A, baseline ctDNA negative (n = 211) versus group B, baseline ctDNA positive but postoperative MRD negative (n = 51) versus group C, baseline ctDNA positive and postoperative MRD positive (n = 16). The 3-year DFS rate was significantly different among the three groups (84% for group A, 78% for group B, and 50% for group C, p = 0.02). After adjusting for clinicopathologic variables, ctDNA still remains an independent risk factor for DFS along with stage (p < 0.001) and micropapillary subtype (p = 0.02). With longitudinal monitoring of ctDNA, MRD was detected before radiological recurrence in 69% of patients with exon 19 deletion and in 20% with L858R mutation.ConclusionsThese results suggest that patients with baseline ctDNA-positive or MRD-positive status were associated with poor DFS in curative resected stages I to IIIA EGFR-M+ NSCLC and that longitudinal monitoring of ctDNA, a noninvasive method, might be useful to detect early recurrence before radiological recurrence.     

Randomized phase III trial of prophylactic cranial irradiation versus observation in patients with fully resected stage IIIA–N2 nonsmall-cell lung cancer and high risk of cerebral metastases after adjuvant chemotherapy

This prospective, randomized, phase III trial shows that prophylactic cranial irradiation prolongs disease-free survival, decreases the rate of cerebral metastases and does not affect quality-of-life for patients with fully resected postoperative pathologically confirmed stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer and high risk of cerebral metastases after adjuvant chemotherapy.BackgroundThis study compared prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) with observation in patients with resected stage IIIA–N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and high risk of cerebral metastases after adjuvant chemotherapy.Patients and methodsIn this open-label, randomized, phase III trial, patients with fully resected postoperative pathologically confirmed stage IIIA–N2 NSCLC and high cerebral metastases risk without recurrence after postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive PCI (30 Gy in 10 fractions) or observation. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary end points included the incidence of brain metastases, overall survival (OS), toxicity and quality of life.ResultsThis trial was terminated early after the random assignment of 156 patients (81 to PCI group and 75 to control group). The PCI group had significantly lengthened DFS compared with the control group, with a median DFS of 28.5 months versus 21.2 months [hazard ratio (HR), 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46–0.98;P = 0.037]. PCI was associated with a decrease in risk of brain metastases (the actuarial 5-year brain metastases rate, 20.3% versus 49.9%; HR, 0.28; 95% CI 0.14–0.57;P < 0.001). The median OS was 31.2 months in the PCI group and 27.4 months in the control group (HR, 0.81; 95% CI 0.56–1.16;P = 0.310). While main toxicities were headache, nausea/vomiting and fatigue in the PCI group, they were generally mild.ConclusionIn patients with fully resected postoperative pathologically confirmed stage IIIA–N2 NSCLC and high risk of cerebral metastases after adjuvant chemotherapy, PCI prolongs DFS and decreases the incidence of brain metastases.     

Recent advances and new insights in the management of early-stage epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer

Patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are candidates for curative surgery; however, despite multiple advances in lung cancer management, recurrence rates remain high. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated to significantly prolong overall survival (OS), but this benefit is modest and there is an urgent need for effective new therapies to provide a cure for more patients. The high efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) against epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFR) in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC has led to the evaluation of these agents in early stages of the disease. Multiple clinical trials have evaluated the safety and efficacy of EGFR TKIs as an adjuvant treatment, in patients with resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC, and shown that they significantly prolong disease-free survival (DFS), but this benefit does not translate to OS. Recently, an interim analysis of the ADAURA trial demonstrated that, surprisingly, osimertinib improved DFS. This led to the study being stopped early, leaving many unanswered questions about its potential effect on OS and its incorporation as a standard adjuvant treatment in this patient subgroup. These targeted agents are also being evaluated in locally-advanced disease, with promising results, although prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results. In this article, we review the most relevant studies on the role of EGFR TKIs in the management of early-stage EGFR-mutated NSCLC.     

Modeling the Cost-Effectiveness of Adjuvant Osimertinib for Patients with Resected EGFR-mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionThe epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib was recently approved for resected EGFR-mutant stages IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer due to improved disease-free survival (DFS) in this population compared with placebo. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of this strategy.Materials and MethodsWe constructed a Markov model using post-resection health state transitions with digitized DFS data from the ADAURA trial to compare cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib versus placebo over a 10-year time horizon. An overall survival (OS) benefit of 5% was assumed. Costs and utility values were derived from Medicare reimbursement data and literature. A CE threshold of 3 times the gross domestic product per capita was used. Sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsThe incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for adjuvant osimertinib was $317 119 per QALY-gained versus placebo. Initial costs of osimertinib are higher in years 1-3. Costs due to progressive disease (PD) are higher in the placebo group through the first 6.5 years. Average pre-PD, post-PD, and total costs were $2388, $379 047, and $502 937, respectively, in the placebo group, and $505 775, $255 638, and $800 697, respectively, in the osimertinib group. Sensitivity analysis of OS gains reaches CE with an hazard ratio (HR) of 0.70-0.75 benefit of osimertinib over placebo. A 50% discount to osimertinib drug cost yielded an ICER of $115 419.ConclusionsThree-years of adjuvant osimertinib is CE if one is willing to pay $317 119 more per QALY-gained. Considerable OS benefit over placebo or other economic interventions will be needed to reach CE.     

Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in Untreated EGFR Mutated Advanced NSCLC and Response to Osimertinib Versus Comparator in FLAURA

IntroductionEGFR mutated (EGFRm) NSCLC tumors occasionally express programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), although frequency and clinical relevance are not fully characterized. We report PD-L1 expression in patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC and association with clinical outcomes following treatment with osimertinib or comparator EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the FLAURA trial (phase III, NCT02296125).MethodsOf 231 tissue blocks available from the screened population (including EGFRm-positive and -negative samples), 197 had sufficient tissue for PD-L1 testing using the SP263 (Ventana, Tucson, Arizona) immunohistochemical assay. Tumor cell (TC) staining thresholds of PD-L1 TC greater than or equal to 1%, TC greater than or equal to 25%, and TC greater than or equal to 50% were applied. Progression-free survival (PFS) was investigator-assessed, per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor, version 1.1, according to PD-L1 expressors (TC ≥ 1%) or negatives (TC < 1%) in randomized patients.ResultsPD-L1 staining was successful in 193 of 197 patient formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks; of these, 128 of 193 were EGFRm-positive and 106 of 128 patients were randomized to treatment (osimertinib: 54; comparator: 52). At the PD-L1 TC greater than or equal to 25% threshold, 8% (10 of 128) of EGFRm-positive tumors expressed PD-L1 versus 35% (23 of 65) of EGFRm-negative tumors. With the TC greater than or equal to 1% threshold, 51% (65 of 128) versus 68% (44 of 65) were mutation-positive and –negative, respectively, and with the TC greater than or equal to 50% threshold, 5% (7 of 128) versus 28% (18 of 65), were mutation-positive and -negative, respectively. For PD-L1 expressors (TC ≥ 1%), median PFS was 18.4 months with osimertinib and 6.9 months with comparator (hazard ratio = 0.30; 95% confidence interval: 0.15–0.60). For PD-L1–negative patients (TC < 1%), median PFS was 18.9 months with osimertinib and 10.9 months with comparator (hazard ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence interval: 0.17–0.74).ConclusionsClinical benefit with osimertinib was unaffected by PD-L1 expression status.     

The Rationale for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

The past decade has witnessed renewed interest in studies exploring the benefits of adjuvant (postoperative) chemotherapy (± radiation therapy) in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently completed adjuvant trials have included a heterogeneous group of patients with resected stages I to IIIA NSCLC. With rare exception, the published results of these studies indicate adjuvant chemotherapy imparts a significant overall survival advantage. Subset analyses suggest survival benefit occurs primarily in patients with resected stage II or IIIA and is less likely to occur in stage I patients. This apparent lack of survival benefit in stage I patients was seemingly validated in a prospective trial conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B in which stage IB patients were randomized to observation or adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel. Survival at 5 -years was identical in the two arms of this trial. By contrast, two contemporary postoperative chemotherapy trials also conducted exclusively in stage I NSCLC patients yielded positive survival results. The divergent outcome of the prospective trials along with the negative subset analyses has created uncertainty as to the utility of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I NSCLC. Herein we review the data underlying this controversy and offer a proposed algorithm to aid the clinician in selecting patients whom we believe may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. The treatment algorithm is based on currently available tumor- and host-related factors that affect prognosis.     

Postsurgical chemotherapy in stage IB nonsmall cell lung cancer: Long-term survival in a randomized study

Although surgical resection is considered the adequate treatment in early stages of nonsmall cell lung cancer, long-term survival is not satisfactory and recurrence rate is high. We previously showed that postoperative chemotherapy at stage IB reduces recurrences and prolongs overall survival. We extended size and observation period of the study sample and performed a separate analysis for minimally resected patients. The trial was designed as a randomized, 2-armed study with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone as control group. All patients had stage IB disease (pT2N0) assessed after a radical surgical procedure (defined as anatomical or minimal). Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (100 mg/m2 day 1) and etoposide (120 mg/m2 days 1-3) for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). One hundred and forty patients entered the study: 70 were assigned to the adjuvant chemotherapy group and 70 to the control group. Groups were homogeneous for conventional risk factors. There was no clinically significant morbidity associated to chemotherapy. Patients were followed for a mean period of 40.31 +/- 30.86 months. A significant difference in overall (p = 0.02) and disease-free (p = 0.0001) survival was observed between patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy vs. control group. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved both overall (p = 0.02) and DFS (p = 0.003) of anatomically resected patients, but only the DFS (p = 0.02) of minimally resected patients. Our results confirm that adjuvant chemotherapy may have a real impact on long-term survival in patients with stage IB nonsmall cell lung cancer being this effect especially evident for those anatomically resected.     

Respiratory and Cardiometabolic Comorbidities and Stages I to III NSCLC Survival: A Pooled Analysis From the International Lung Cancer Consortium

IntroductionWe explored the association of respiratory and cardiometabolic comorbidities with NSCLC overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), by stage, in a large, multicontinent NSCLC pooled data set.MethodsOn the basis of patients pooled from 11 International Lung Cancer Consortium studies with available respiratory and cardiometabolic comorbidity data, adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated using Cox models for OS. LCSS was evaluated using competing risk Grey and Fine models and cumulative incidence functions. Logistic regression (adjusted OR [aOR]) was applied to assess factors associated with surgical resection.ResultsOS analyses used patients with NSCLC with respiratory health or cardiometabolic health data (N = 16,354); a subset (n = 11,614) contributed to LCSS analyses. In stages I to IIIA NSCLC, patients with respiratory comorbidities had worse LCCS (stage IA aHR = 1.51, confidence interval [CI]: 1.17–1.95; stages IB–IIIA aHR = 1.20, CI: 1.06–1.036). In contrast, patients with stages I to IIIA NSCLC with cardiometabolic comorbidities had a higher risk of death from competing (non-NSCLC) causes (stage IA aHR = 1.34, CI: 1.12–1.69). The presence of respiratory comorbidities was inversely associated with having surgical resection (stage IA aOR = 0.54, CI: 0.35–0.83; stages IB–IIIA aOR = 0.57, CI: 0.46–0.70).ConclusionsThe presence of either cardiometabolic or respiratory comorbidities is associated with worse OS in stages I to III NSCLC. Patients with respiratory comorbidities were less likely to undergo surgery and had worse LCSS, whereas patients with cardiometabolic comorbidities had a higher risk of death from competing causes. As more treatment options for stages I to III NSCLC are introduced into the practice, accounting for cardiometabolic and respiratory comorbidities becomes essential in trial interpretation and clinical management.     

Optimal adjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer--how to handle stage I disease

The standard of care for resected stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) now includes adjuvant chemotherapy based on the results of three phase III studies using cisplatin-based regimens--the International Adjuvant Lung Trial, the National Cancer Institute of Canada JBR.10 trial, and the Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association trial. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I disease remains controversial. A recent meta-analysis (the Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation) showed potential harm with the addition of adjuvant cisplatin for stage IA disease and no survival benefit for this modality in stage IB disease. Updated results from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9633 trial, the only trial to focus exclusively on stage IB patients, no longer show a statistically significant survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in this population, except for the subgroup of patients with larger tumors. It may be that trials have been underpowered to detect a small benefit for patients with stage IB disease, or there may really not be benefit to adding adjuvant therapy for this stage of disease. Additional markers, such as tumor size or the presence or absence of certain tumor proteins like ERCC1, may help to determine which patients with resected stage I NSCLC may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Strategies such as inhibition of angiogenesis pathways and the epidermal growth factor receptor are under exploration.     

Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not known. We aimed to compare the effect of adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation on survival in patients with completely resected NSCLC. METHODS: 840 patients with stage IB-IIIA NSCLC from 101 centres in 14 countries were randomly assigned to observation (n=433) or to 30 mg/m(2) vinorelbine plus 100 mg/m(2) cisplatin (n=407). Postoperative radiotherapy was not mandatory and was undertaken according to every centre's policy. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN95053737. FINDINGS: 367 patients in the chemotherapy group and 431 in the control group received their assigned treatment. 301 (36%) patients had stage IB disease, 203 (24%) had stage II disease, and 325 (39%) had stage IIIA disease. Tolerance to chemotherapy mainly included neutropenia in 335 (92%) patients and febrile neutropenia in 34 (9%); seven (2%) toxic deaths were also recorded. Compliance was greater with cisplatin than with vinorelbine (median dose intensity 89% [range 17-108] vs 59% [17-100]). After a median follow-up of 76 months (range 43-116), median survival was 65.7 months (95% CI 47.9-88.5) in the chemotherapy group and 43.7 (35.7-52.3) months in the observation group. Adjusted risk for death was significantly reduced in patients assigned chemotherapy compared with controls (hazard ratio 0.80 [95% CI 0.66-0.96]; p=0.017). Overall survival at 5 years with chemotherapy improved by 8.6%, which was maintained at 7 years (8.4%). INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin extends survival in patients with completely resected NSCLC, better defining indication of adjuvant chemotherapy.     

A retrospective comparison of adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin

Background

Adjuvant chemotherapy with vinorelbine plus cisplatin (NP) has been demonstrated to increase overall survival in patients with stage II or IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) failed to demonstrate efficacy in patients with stage IB NSCLC, an exploratory analysis suggested that patients with large tumors can benefit from adjuvant PC therapy.

Methods

Clinical outcomes of patients who received adjuvant NP or PC regimens after complete resection for their NSCLC were retrospectively compared.

Results

Of the 438 patients with completely resected NSCLC, 207 received PC and 231 patients received NP. The median relapse-free survival (RFS) was not significantly different, with 63.6 months for the PC group and 54.8 months for the NP group (P = .68). Overall survival also did not differ significantly between the two groups. The five-year overall survival rates were 73% (95% confidence interval (CI), 66–80%) in PC group and 71% (95% CI, 64–78%) in NP group (P = .71). In the subgroup analysis, RFS was comparable between the two groups across all variables. Analysis of the adverse events indicated that sensory neuropathy, alopecia, and myalgia are more frequent in the PC, while anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, anorexia, and vomiting are more common in the NP.

Conclusion

Although the adverse event profiles were different, the efficacy was comparable between the PC and NP regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC. While there is lack of prospective data, our retrospective data suggest that PC regimen can be considered as adjuvant chemotherapy for resected NSCLC.     

Actual status of adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer at one Japanese cancer center: the need for increased cooperation between medical oncologists and surgeons

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognosis of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated by complete resection. At Shizuoka Cancer Center, thoracic surgeons evaluate the indications for adjuvant chemotherapy, and once a patient is judged as suitable for adjuvant chemotherapy, uracil-tegafur (UFT) is prescribed by them mainly in cases of stage IB, or the patient is referred to a medical oncologist for parenteral chemotherapy mainly in cases of stages IIA to IIIA. However, both the medical oncologists and the surgeons at our institute often encounter differences in attitudes toward adjuvant chemotherapy among them. One hundred and nine patients with NSCLC, of pathological stages IB to IIIA, who underwent complete resection at our institute, between April 2005 and June 2007, were recruited for this study. By reviewing medical charts of the patients and interviewing medical oncologists and surgeons at our institute, we mainly analyzed the differences in the judgment of the patients’ suitability for adjuvant chemotherapy among surgeons and the differences in the proportion of patients who agreed to the adjuvant chemotherapy recommended by the medical oncologists. The proportion of patients judged as unsuitable for adjuvant chemotherapy by one surgeon was higher when compared with that by the other three surgeons. While all patients who were referred to two medical oncologists agreed to the adjuvant chemotherapy, few patients referred to the other medical oncologists agreed. This study revealed that there were considerable differences in whether patients consented to adjuvant chemotherapy depending on the medical oncologists that they were referred to, and suggested possible differences in the judgment of the patients’ suitability for adjuvant chemotherapy among surgeons.     

Postoperative Adjuvant Systemic Therapy in Completely Resected Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

The purpose of the present review was to determine whether the use of postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with completely resected non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) improves survival. Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care reviewed the evidence to update previously published recommendations for patients with completely resected NSCLC. Relevant studies were identified from a systematic MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews search of studies published from 2010 to 2016. All phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and relevant systematic reviews were included. Data on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, adverse events, and quality of life were extracted from each of the studies. Two relevant systematic reviews, 13 RCTs, and a series of pooled analyses by Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation-Biomarker were included in the present review. Adjuvant chemotherapy statistically significantly improved OS for resected stage II-IIIA NSCLC and is recommended. For patients with stage IB NSCLC, no significant improvement was seen in OS; however, the results from subgroup analyses indicate that it would be reasonable to consider adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with larger tumors (≥ 4 cm). The present data do not support the use of adjuvant novel therapies (ie, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, bevacizumab, and immunotherapy) either as an addition to, or instead of, cytotoxic chemotherapy. No predictive biomarkers are available to select patients more likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the standard of care as adjuvant therapy for patients with resected stage II-IIIA NSCLC. Additional clinical trials are needed to evaluate targeted agents in molecularly defined subgroups before these agents can be recommended in the adjuvant setting.     

Locoregional Control,Overall Survival,and Disease-Free Survival in Stage IIIA (N2) Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis of Resected and Unresected Patients

IntroductionThe standard of care for stage IIIA (N2) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) includes concurrent definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) followed by durvalumab, thus challenging the role of surgery in resectable patients. We assessed locoregional disease control and survival in patients with surgically resected and unresected stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC disease.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis from prospectively collected databases at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery or dCRT for clinical stage IIIA (N2) disease (2004-2014) were evaluated. Primary outcomes included locoregional disease control, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier outcome analyses were performed.ResultsOf the 159 resected patients, the majority had lobectomy (82.4%), followed by pneumonectomy (11.9%) and sublobar resection (5.7%). The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 0.6% and 1.3%, respectively. At median follow-up of 52.8 months, recurrence was 55.3%, with 44.0% having distant and 15.1% locoregional recurrence. At 5 years, OS was 50.8% and DFS was 33.1% Median OS was 61.2 months. A total of 366 patients underwent dCRT, with intensity-modulated radiation in 64.5%, proton therapy in 26.0%, and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in 9.6%. The mean dose was 68.1 Gy. At median follow-up of 20.8 months, recurrence was 53.6%, with distant and locoregional recurrence of 40.7% and 30.3%, respectively. At 5 years, OS was 29.2% and DFS was 20.5%. Median OS was 27.5 months.ConclusionStage IIIA (N2) NSCLC continues to be a heterogeneous disease, and patients with surgically resected and unresected disease represent different risk populations. Ongoing immunotherapy trials may further redefine treatment algorithms in this complex patient population.     

Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Chemoradiotherapy with Chemotherapy for Completely Resected Unsuspected N2-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionWe investigated whether concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) would increase survival in patients with completely resected unsuspected N2-positive NSCLC versus in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy alone.MethodsEligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the CCRT arm or the chemotherapy arm. In the CCRT arm, patients received concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions) with five cycles of weekly paclitaxel (50 mg/m²) and cisplatin (25 mg/m²), followed by two additional cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) plus cisplatin (80 mg/m²) at 3-week intervals. In the chemotherapy arm, patients received four cycles of adjuvant paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) and carboplatin (area under the curve = 5.5) every 3 weeks. The primary end point was disease-free survival.ResultsWe enrolled and analyzed 101 patients (51 received CCRT and 50 received chemotherapy). In all, 74 and 27 patients were preoperatively staged as N0 and N1 diseases, respectively. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. The median disease-free survival of the CCRT arm was 24.7 months, which was not significantly different from that of the chemotherapy arm (21.9 months) (hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% confident interval: 0.58–1.52, p = 0.40). There was no difference in overall survival (74.3 months in CCRT arm and 83.5 months in the chemotherapy arm) (hazard ratio = 1.33, 95% confident interval: 0.71–2.49).ConclusionsThere was no survival benefit from adjuvant CCRT compared with from platinum-based chemotherapy alone for completely resected unsuspected N2-positive NSCLC. However, the role of sequential radiotherapy administered after adjuvant chemotherapy is being evaluated, and further study is needed to evaluate the optimal radiotherapy approach for completely resected N2-positive NSCLC.     

Maintenance Sunitinib following Initial Platinum-Based Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced-Stage IIIB/IV Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized,Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study—CALGB 30607 (Alliance)

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy of maintenance sunitinib after first-line chemotherapy for stage IIIB/IV NSCLC.MethodsCancer and Leukemia Group B 30607 trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study that enrolled patients without progression after four cycles of first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. Bevacizumab was allowed only during the four cycles of chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive sunitinib, 37.5 mg/d, or placebo and were treated until unacceptable adverse event(s), progression, or death. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsA total of 210 patients were enrolled, randomized, and included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Ten patients did not receive maintenance therapy (four who received placebo and six who received sunitinib). Grade 3/4 adverse events affecting more than 5% of the patients were fatigue (25%), thrombocytopenia (12%), hypertension (12%), rash (11%), mucositis (11%), neutropenia (7%), and anemia (6%) for sunitinib and none for placebo. There were three grade 5 events in patients receiving sunitinib (one pulmonary hemorrhage, one other pulmonary event, and one death not associated with a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events term) and two grade 5 events in patients receiving placebo (one other pulmonary event and one thromboembolism). Median PFS was 4.3 months for sunitinib and 2.6 months for placebo (hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.47–0.82, p = 0.0006). Median overall survival was 11.7 months for sunitinib versus 12.1 months for placebo (hazard ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.73–1.31, p = 0.89).ConclusionsMaintenance sunitinib was safe and improved PFS as maintenance therapy in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC but had no impact on overall survival. There is no room for future investigations of sunitinib in this setting.     

Role of Postoperative Radiotherapy After Curative Resection and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Pathological Stage N2 Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to evaluate the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in the setting of adjuvant chemotherapy for pathological stage N2 (pN2) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and MethodsA retrospective review of 219 consecutive pN2 NSCLC patients who underwent curative surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy was performed. Forty-one patients additionally received PORT. Propensity scores for PORT receipt were individually calculated and used for matching to compare the outcome between patients who did (+) and did not (-) receive PORT. One hundred eleven patients in the PORT (-) group and 38 patients in PORT (+) group were matched. Clinical and pathologic characteristics were well-balanced.ResultsThe median follow-up duration was 48 months. In the matched patients, PORT resulted in a significantly lower crude locoregional relapse (43.2% vs. 23.7%; P = .032). Also, PORT was associated with improved locoregional control (LRC) rate (5-year LRC 63.7% vs. 48.6%; P = .036), but not distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival. An exploratory subgroup analysis suggested a potential DFS benefit of PORT in patients with multiple station mediastinal lymph node metastases (5-year DFS, 43.2% vs. 16.6%; P = .037) and squamous cell carcinoma histology (5-year DFS, 70.1% vs. 23.3%; P = .011).ConclusionsEven in the setting of adjuvant chemotherapy, PORT significantly increased LRC for patients with curatively resected pN2 NSCLC. Some subgroups appear to benefit from PORT in terms of DFS and LRC. Individualized strategies based on risk factors might be considered.     

Chemotherapy plus Vandetanib or Chemotherapy Alone in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Four Randomised Controlled Trials

AimsMost patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) require systemic chemotherapy. Vandetanib, targeting epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signalling in NSCLC, has recently been evaluated in combination chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC. However, the advantage of chemotherapy plus vandetanib over chemotherapy alone in advanced NSCLC remains largely unknown. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was carried out to compare the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy plus vandetanib with chemotherapy alone in advanced NSCLC.Materials and methodsThe PubMed database, American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society for Medical Oncology and the Cochrane Library and references of published trials were searched. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the trials. Data were extracted and the overall response rate, pooled progression-free survival, overall survival with 95% confidence intervals and main toxicity were analysed.ResultsFour randomised controlled trials involving 2160 patients with advanced NSCLC were ultimately analysed. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus vandetanib significantly increased the overall response rate (relative risk = 1.96, 95% confidence interval = 1.53––2.52) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval = 0.71–0.87), but there was no significant difference in overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.91, 95% confidence interval = 0.79–1.03). Patients who received chemotherapy plus vandetanib had more rash, diarrhoea, hypertension and QTc prolongation (odds ratio = 2.32, 95% confidence interval = 1.93–2.79; odds ratio = 1.64, 95% confidence interval = 1.37–1.97; odds ratio = 4.08, 95% confidence interval = 2.51–6.01, odds ratio = 17.77, 95% confidence interval = 3.54–61.66, respectively), and less nausea and vomiting (odds ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = 0.58–0.85; odds ratio = 0.69, 95% confidence interval = 0.55–0.86, respectively). The incidences of haemorrhage, fatigue and cough were comparable between the two groups.ConclusionsAlthough similar in overall survival, chemotherapy plus vandetanib showed particular advantages over chemotherapy alone in terms of progression-free survival and overall response rate. The toxicity was comparable between the two groups. Therefore, chemotherapy plus vandetanib might be a safe and valid therapeutic option for advanced NSCLC patients.