Airway Occlusion Pressure to Titrate Positive End-expiratory Pressure in Patients with Dynamic Hyperinflation

Background: Although the use of external positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is recommended for patients with intrinsic PEEP, no simple method exists for bedside titration. We hypothesized that the occlusion pressure, measured from airway pressure during the phase of ventilator triggering (P0.1t), could help to indicate the effects of PEEP on the work of breathing (WOB).

Methods: Twenty patients under assisted ventilation with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were studied with 0, 5, and 10 cm H2O of PEEP while ventilated with a fixed level of pressure support.

Results: PEEP 5 significantly reduced intrinsic PEEP (mean +/- SD, 5.2 +/- 2.4 cm H2O at PEEP 0 to 3.6 +/- 1.9 at PEEP 5;P < 0.001), WOB per min (12.6 +/- 6.7 J/min to 9.1 +/- 5.9 J/min;P = 0.003), WOB per liter (1.2 +/- 0.4 J/l to 0.8 +/- 0.4 J/l;P < 0.001), pressure time product of the diaphragm (216 +/- 86 cm H2O [middle dot] s-1 [middle dot] min-1 to 155 +/- 179 cm H2O [middle dot] s-1 [middle dot] min-1;P = 0.001) and P0.1t (3.3 +/- 1.5 cm H2O to 2.3 +/- 1.4 cm H2O;P = 0.002). At PEEP 10, no further significant reduction in muscle effort nor in P0.1t (2.5 +/- 2.1 cm H2O) occurred, and transpulmonary pressure indicated an increase in end-expiratory lung volume. Significant correlations were found between WOB per min and P0.1t at the three levels of PEEP (P < 0.001), and between the changes in P0.1tversus the changes in WOB per min (P < 0.005), indicating that P0.1t and WOB changed in the same direction. A decrease in P0.1 with PEEP indicated a decrease in intrinsic PEEP with a specificity of 71% and a sensitivity of 88% and a decrease in WOB with a specificity of 86% and a sensitivity of 91%.     

Set Positive End-expiratory Pressure during Protective Ventilation Affects Lung Injury

Background: The most appropriate method of determining positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level during a lung protective ventilatory strategy has not been established.

Methods: In a lavage-injured sheep acute respiratory distress syndrome model, the authors compared the effects of three approaches to determining PEEP level after a recruitment maneuver: (1) 2 cm H2O above the lower inflection point on the inflation pressure-volume curve, (2) at the point of maximum curvature on the deflation pressure-volume curve, and (3) at the PEEP level that maintained target arterial oxygen partial pressure at a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.5.

Results: Positive end-expiratory pressure set 2 cm H2O above the lower inflection point resulted in the least injury over the course of the study. PEEP based on adequate arterial oxygen partial pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen ratios had to be increased over time and resulted in higher mRNA levels for interleukin-8 and interleukin-1[beta] and greater tissue inflammation when compared with the other approaches. PEEP at the point of maximum curvature could not maintain eucapneia even at an increased ventilatory rate.     

Relation of the Static Compliance Curve and Positive End-expiratory Pressure to Oxygenation during One-lung Ventilation

Background : Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is commonly applied to the ventilated lung to try to improve oxygenation during one-lung ventilation but is an unreliable therapy and occasionally causes arterial oxygen partial pressure (Pao2) to decrease further. The current study examined whether the effects of PEEP on oxygenation depend on the static compliance curve of the lung to which it is applied.

Methods : Forty-two adults undergoing thoracic surgery were studied during stable, open-chest, one-lung ventilation. Arterial blood gasses were measured during two-lung ventilation and one-lung ventilation before, during, and after the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP to the ventilated lung. The plateau end-expiratory pressure and static compliance curve of the ventilated lung were measured with and without applied PEEP, and the lower inflection point was determined from the compliance curve.

Results : Mean (+/- SD) Pao2 values, with a fraction of inspired oxygen of 1.0, were not different during one-lung ventilation before (192 +/- 91 mmHg), during (190 +/- 90), or after ( 205 +/- 79) the addition of 5 cm H2O PEEP. The mean plateau end-expiratory pressure increased from 4.2 to 6.8 cm H2O with the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP and decreased to 4.5 cm H2O when 5 cm H2O PEEP was removed. Six patients showed a clinically useful (> 20%) increase in Pao2 with 5 cm H2O PEEP, and nine patients had a greater than 20% decrease in Pao2. The change in Pao2 with the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP correlated in an inverse fashion with the change in the gradient between the end-expiratory pressure and the pressure at the lower inflection point (r = 0.76). The subgroup of patients with a Pao2 during two-lung ventilation that was less than the mean (365 mmHg) and an end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation without applied PEEP less than the mean were more likely to have an increase in Pao2 when 5 cm H2O PEEP was applied.     

Pulmonary Blood Flow Redistribution with Low Levels of Positive End-expiratory Pressure

Background: Recent studies have questioned the importance of the gravitational model of pulmonary perfusion. Because low levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) are commonly used during anesthesia, the authors studied the distribution of pulmonary blood flow with low levels of PEEP using a high spatial resolution technique. They hypothesized that if hydrostatic factors were important in the distribution of pulmonary blood flow, PEEP would redistribute flow to more dependent lung regions.

Methods: The effects of zero cm H2 O PEEP and 5 cm H2 O PEEP on pulmonary gas exchange were studied using the multiple inert gas elimination technique; the distribution of pulmonary blood flow, using fluorescent-labeled microspheres, was also investigated in mechanically ventilated, pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs. The lungs were removed, cleared of blood, dried at total lung capacity, and then cubed to obtain approximately 1,000 small pieces of lung ([approximately] 1.7 cm3).

Results: Positive end-expiratory pressure increased the partial pressure of oxygen by 6 +/- 2 mmHg (P < 0.05) and reduced all measures of ventilation and perfusion heterogeneity (P < 0.05). By reducing flow to nondependent ventral lung regions and increasing flow to dependent dorsal lung regions, PEEP increased (P < 0.05) the dorsal-to-ventral gradient. Redistribution of blood flow with PEEP accounted for 7 +/- 3%, whereas structural factors accounted for 93 +/- 3% of the total variance in blood flow.     

Positive End-expiratory Pressure Improves Respiratory Function in Obese but not in Normal Subjects during Anesthesia and Paralysis

Background: Morbidly obese patients, during anesthesia and paralysis, experience more severe impairment of respiratory mechanics and gas exchange than normal subjects. The authors hypothesized that positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) induces different responses in normal subjects (n = 9; body mass index < 25 kg/m2) versus obese patients (n = 9; body mass index > 40 kg/m2).

Methods: The authors measured lung volumes (helium technique), the elastances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall, the pressure-volume curves (occlusion technique and esophageal balloon), and the intraabdominal pressure (intrabladder catheter) at PEEP 0 and 10 cm H2O in paralyzed, anesthetized postoperative patients in the intensive care unit or operating room after abdominal surgery.

Results: At PEEP 0 cm H2O, obese patients had lower lung volume (0.59 +/- 0.17 vs. 2.15 +/- 0.58 l [mean +/- SD], P < 0.01); higher elastances of the respiratory system (26.8 +/- 4.2 vs. 16.4 +/- 3.6 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01), lung (17.4 +/- 4.5 vs. 10.3 +/- 3.2 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01), and chest wall (9.4 +/- 3.0 vs. 6.1 +/- 1.4 cm H2O/l, P < 0.01); and higher intraabdominal pressure (18.8 +/- 7.8 vs. 9.0 +/- 2.4 cm H2O, P < 0.01) than normal subjects. The arterial oxygen tension was significantly lower (110 +/- 30 vs. 218 +/- 47 mmHg, P < 0.01; inspired oxygen fraction = 50%), and the arterial carbon dioxide tension significantly higher (37.8 +/- 6.8 vs. 28.4 +/- 3.1, P < 0.01) in obese patients compared with normal subjects. Increasing PEEP to 10 cm H2O significantly reduced elastances of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall in obese patients but not in normal subjects. The pressure-volume curves were shifted upward and to the left in obese patients but were unchanged in normal subjects. The oxygenation increased with PEEP in obese patients (from 110 +/- 30 to 130 +/- 28 mmHg, P < 0.01) but was unchanged in normal subjects. The oxygenation changes were significantly correlated with alveolar recruitment (r = 0.81, P < 0.01).     

Effects of Positive End-expiratory Pressure and Different Tidal Volumes on Alveolar Recruitment and Hyperinflation

Background: The morphologic effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and of two tidal volumes were studied by computed tomography to determine whether setting the tidal volume (Vt) at the upper inflection point (UIP) of the pressure-volume (P-V) curve of the respiratory system or 10 ml/kg have different effects on hyperinflation and alveolar recruitment.

Methods: Alveolar recruitment and hyperinflation were quantified by computed tomography in nine patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). First, end expiration was compared without PEEP and with PEEP set at the lower inflection point of the P-V curve; second, at end inspiration above PEEP, a reduced Vt set at the UIP (rVt) and a standard 10 ml/kg Vt (Vt) ending above the UIP were compared. Three lung zones were defined from computed tomographic densities: hyperdense, normal, and hyperinflated zones.

Results: Positive end-expiratory pressure induced a significant decrease in hyperdensities (from 46.8 +/- 18% to 38 +/- 15.1% of zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) area; P < 0.02) with a concomitant increase in normal zones (from 47.3 +/- 20.9% to 56.5 +/- 13.2% of the ZEEP area; P < 0.05), and a significant increase in hyperinflation (from 8.1 +/- 5.9% to 17.8 +/- 12.7% of ZEEP area; P < 0.01). At end inspiration, a significant increase in hyperinflated areas was observed with Vt compared with rVt (33.4 +/- 17.8 vs. 26.8 +/- 17.3% of ZEEP area; P < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed for both normal and hyperdense zones.     

左心转流在胸部降主动脉瘤手术中的应用

目的探讨左心转流在降主动脉瘤手术治疗中的应用。方法11例降主动脉癌患者,均行左心转流降主动脉人工血管置换术。结果全部患者的治疗效果均十分满意,1例术后胸腔出血并肺部感染,经再次开胸止血,联合应用抗生素和全身支持治疗后痊愈,其余患者均无并发症发生。结论左心转流下行胸部降主动脉瘤手术是积极安全有效的。     

Correlations of Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure with Hemodynamic Parameters During Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Central venous pressure (CVP) has long been thought to correlate with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. We examined hemodynamic factors during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery to determine their relationship with CSF pressure and aortic cross-clamping. Hemodynamic parameters and CSF pressure were measured in 124 patients at six different stages during repair of descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: skin incision, left lung collapse, pump on, aortic clamp on, aortic clamp off, and pump off. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was used for statistical analysis. CVP was a weak predictor for CSF pressure at the beginning of surgery and when the pump was initiated. At the onset of left lung collapse, cardiac output correlated with CSF pressure. There were no predictors during aortic cross-clamping. Model r2 values were low, ranging 0.03-0.15. We found no hemodynamic predictors of CSF pressure throughout the period of aortic cross-clamping during descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Model r2 values were low, indicating generally poor prediction of CSF pressure.