Arthroscopic meniscal repair: analysis of treatment failures

The rationale for meniscal repair is based on the importance of the meniscus in overall knee function and stability as well as the inferior results seen with meniscectomy. The high success rate usually seen with arthroscopic meniscal repair has made it the treatment of choice for peripheral meniscal tears. This study reviewed the records of patients who have failed meniscal repair surgery to gain greater understanding of the factors that may predispose a patient to a failed outcome. From 1987 to 2002, three hundred meniscal repairs were performed (203 medial and 97 lateral). Thirty-seven patients had failed meniscal repairs. Records were available for 33 (89%) patients. The mean patient age was 25 years (range: 13-48 years) at the time of meniscal injury. The average initial tear size was 2.7 cm with a mean rim width of 2.3 mm. Eighty-eight percent occurred in ACL tears. The average time interval from initial repair to the recurrence of symptoms was 34 months. Patients who were older at the time of meniscal repair failed significantly later than those patients who were younger at the time of repair. With age stratification, those patients who were aged > or =29 years at time of meniscal repair failed at an average of 23 months. In contrast, patients who were aged > or =30 years at the time of repair failed at an average of 53 months. Larger initial tears failed significantly sooner than smaller tears. Initial tears with larger rim widths demonstrated a trend toward shorter time to failure. Patients who underwent combined ligament reconstruction with meniscal repair failed at an average of 37 months. Deficient ACLs that were treated with isolated meniscal repairs (ACL intact) failed at an average of 16 months.     

Biodegradable arrows for arthroscopic repair of meniscal tears

Thirty-two meniscal tears in 32 patients were repaired using biodegradable meniscus arrows. The tears were fixed arthroscopically using an all-inside technique. Ten patients had a simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The period of follow-up was an average of 25 (10-40) months. Twenty-six patients were clinically stable and asymptomatic at follow-up. Six patients were considered clinically unstable and all had associated ACL reconstruction and required a repeat arthroscopy. Two meniscal repairs failed to heal, and the broken meniscus arrow was retrieved arthroscopically 6 months after the primary operation. In four cases the meniscal tear healed completely (two cases) or partially. Otherwise, there were no objective signs of complications. The use of meniscus arrows is a simple, safe, and reliable method for repair of properly selected meniscal tears.     

Postoperative change in medial meniscal length in concurrent all-inside meniscus repair with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

Meniscus repair can restore meniscal function that transfers the axial compressive force to circumferential tensile strain. However, few reports have investigated the relationship between concurrent meniscus repair with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and postoperative meniscal position. This study aimed to evaluate medial meniscal size and clinical results in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and concomitant all-inside medial meniscus repair.

Methods

Twenty patients underwent ACL reconstruction and concurrent medial meniscus repair of a peripheral longitudinal tear using the FasT-Fix meniscal repair device. Medial tibial plateau length (MTPL) and width (MTPW) were determined by radiographic images. We evaluated the Lysholm score, anteroposterior instability, meniscal healing and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based medial meniscal length (MML) and width (MMW). Correlations between MRI-based meniscal size, radiographic measurement and height were investigated.

Results

All patients showed complete healing of the repaired meniscus in arthroscopic evaluation. However, one patient needed a subsequent meniscus repair during the follow-up period. Lysholm score and anteroposterior instability improved significantly. A better correlation was observed between MMW and MTPW than between MML and MTPL. Concurrent all-inside medial meniscus repair with ACL reconstruction significantly increased MML percentage (%MML) (100 MML/MTPL) but did not affect MMW percentage (%MMW) (100 MMW/MTPW).

Conclusions

Concurrent all-inside medial meniscus repair with ACL reconstruction had satisfactory clinical results. %MML was increased by concurrent medial meniscus repair without affecting %MMW. Our results suggest that medial meniscus repair associated with ACL reconstruction may restore meniscal function by adjusting the anteroposterior length of the torn medial meniscus.     

全关节镜下应用FasT—Fix修复半月板损伤的中期疗效观察

目的探讨关节镜下应用FasT-Fix缝合修复半月板损伤,并在有效的康复治疗后评价其中期临床疗效。方法回顾性研究因半月板损伤而在关节镜下采用FasT—Fix缝合修复治疗的患者。本组患者24例（男14例,女10例）,共计31例半月板损伤,年龄15—52岁（平均28．3岁）。其中12例是单纯的半月板修复缝合、19例患者是在前交叉韧带重建术后进行的缝合。包括内侧半月板损伤12例,外侧半月板损伤9例,内外侧半月板同时损伤5例,病程1周-23周（除去2例3年的患者）,平均12周。撕裂长度平均15mm（10～25ram）。其中红红区15例,红白区16例,没有白白区进行缝合。平均缝合针数2针（1～4针）。结果所有病例术后均无并发症的发生,随访时间2—4年,平均为2．7年,Lysholm,Tegner,IKDC评分术前、术后评分分别为：45．3、85．4;2．1、3．5;3．1、7．1,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。结论FasT-Fix修复半月板损伤患者在有效康复下,通过中期随访获得88％的优良率。     

The outcome of nonoperatively treated complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament in active young adults

The results of nonoperative treatment of 72 patients with complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, documented by examination under anesthesia and arthroscopy, were evaluated. All patients had an acute injury with hemarthrosis in a previously normal knee. Patients having meniscal repair were excluded as were those with collateral or posterior cruciate ligament tears or associated fractures. Treatment in all cases consisted of a standard protocol of early rehabilitation and bracing. A detailed rating of symptoms and function was performed at an average of 38 months postinjury (range, eight to 84 months). Overall results were 11% excellent, 20% good, 15% fair, and 54% poor. Thirty-five percent had ACL reconstruction during the follow-up period. Results indicate that young adults who return to a vocation requiring strenuous physical activity frequently can expect unsatisfactory results after nonoperative treatment of an acute complete tear of the ACL.     

Meniscal repair and transplantation: indications, techniques, rehabilitation, and clinical outcome

The purpose of this paper is to provide current knowledge regarding the indications, operative techniques, rehabilitation programs, and clinical outcomes of meniscus repair and transplantation procedures. Meniscus tears that occur in the periphery may be repaired using a variety of operative procedures with high success rates. Complex multiplanar tears that extend into the central one-third avascular zone can also be successfully repaired using a meticulous vertically divergent suture technique. The outcome of these repairs justifies preservation of meniscal tissue, especially in younger athletic individuals. Meniscal transplantation is a valid treatment option for patients who have undergone meniscectomy and have related tibiofemoral joint pain, or in whom articular cartilage deterioration in the meniscectomized compartment is present. Rehabilitation after these operations includes knee motion and quadriceps-strengthening exercises initiated the first day postoperatively. The initial goal is to prevent excessive weight bearing and joint compressive forces that could disrupt the healing meniscus repair or transplant. The protocol contains modifications according to the type of meniscal tear, if a concomitant procedure is done (such as a ligament reconstruction) or if noteworthy articular cartilage deterioration is present. Patients who have repairs of peripheral meniscus tears are generally progressed more rapidly than those who have repairs of tears extending in the central one-third region or those who undergo meniscal transplantation. The safety and effectiveness of the rehabilitation program has been demonstrated in several clinical studies. We recommend preservation of meniscal tissue, regardless of age, in active patients whenever possible.     

Anterior cruciate ligament tears in skeletally immature patients: meniscal pathology at presentation and after attempted conservative treatment.

We evaluated 12 skeletally immature patients with acute, intrasubstance tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and open physes for meniscal pathology. Arthrograms were completed in 10 of 12 patients, and subsequent arthroscopy confirmed 8 meniscal tears (4 medial, 4 lateral) in 6 patients. Four patients with repairable menisci underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair and stabilization. Eight patients received quadriceps and hamstrings rehabilitation and returned to sports with a brace. After return to sports, all braced patients developed instability with multiple episodes of "giving way." Average time from initial injury to first episode of instability was 7 months. Seven patients sustained further meniscal damage an average of 15 months (range 7-27 months) after initial injury. We conclude that meniscal pathology is commonly associated with ACL tears in skeletally immature patients and we recommend arthrography or arthroscopy to evaluate patients with suspected ACL tears. Brace management did not prevent instability or new meniscal tears.     

Meniscus Tears: Treatment in the Stable and Unstable Knee

Basic science research and follow-up studies after meniscectomy have provided convincing evidence of the importance of preservation of the meniscus in decreasing the risk of late degenerative changes. Whether in a stable or an unstable knee, if a meniscus tear cannot be repaired, a conservative partial meniscectomy should be undertaken to preserve as much meniscal tissue as possible. When feasible, repair should be carried out in young patients with an isolated meniscus tear, despite healing rates that are significantly lower than those obtained when meniscus repair is done with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The incidence of successful healing is inversely related to the rim width and tear length. In general, meniscus repair should be limited to patients under 50 years of age. Vertical longitudinal tears, including bucket-handle tears, are most amenable to repair. Some radial split tears can be repaired. In an ACL-deficient knee, meniscus repair is more prone to failure if not performed in conjunction with an ACL reconstruction, and is not recommended. Meniscal allograft surgery is investigational but may hold promise for selected patients.     

Nonoperative treatment of partial-thickness meniscal tears identified during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

The reported incidence and treatment of partial-thickness meniscal tears seen at anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction varies widely. The success of nonoperative treatment of partial meniscal tears identified during ACL reconstruction at our institution was reviewed. All incomplete meniscal tears were treated with observation, all full-thickness tears were treated with repair or partial meniscectomy. Partial tears of the lateral meniscus were noted three times more commonly than in the medial meniscus and were seen more acutely after ACL injury than full-thickness tears. At 2-year follow-up, excellent knee function was noted when these tears were treated nonoperatively.     

Meniscus repair: results of an arthroscopic technique

A prospective study of arthroscopically repaired peripheral meniscal tears in 24 patients (19 men and five women) was initiated in 1983. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Seventeen medial and five lateral tears were followed an average of 29 months (15-42 months) with 17 having clinically apparent healing (77%). Sixteen had ACL tears, 10 of which were stabilized. Thirteen of 16 stable knees healed their menisci (81%), whereas only 4 of 6 unstable knees had healed menisci (67%). Fifteen were acute tears repaired within 2 weeks of injury, and 7 were chronic tears. Four acutely repaired menisci failed. One lateral meniscus tore in the previously sutured site 12 months later, whereas 1 medial meniscus tore 24 months after repair in a new area associated with significant trauma. Repair of a longitudinal peripheral meniscal tear permits salvage of this structure in a high percentage of cases. No serious complications such as peroneal nerve or popliteal vascular damage occurred. Transient saphenous neuropraxia (22%) and posterior portal adhesions (9%) were temporary problems. The procedure is recommended only for the advanced arthroscopist, who is advised first to establish the anatomical relationships clearly by cadaver dissections.     

The Results of All-Inside Meniscus Repair Using the Viper Repair System Simultaneously with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background

Meniscus tears are commonly associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures. It is essential to repair meniscal tears as much as possible to prevent early osteoarthritis and to gain additional stability in the knee joint. We evaluated the results of arthroscopic all-inside repair using the Meniscal Viper Repair System (Arthrex) on meniscus tears simultaneously with ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Nineteen out of 22 patients who were treated with arthroscopic all-inside repair using the Meniscal Viper Repair System for meniscus tear associated with ACL rupture were evaluated. ACL reconstructions were performed at the same period. The mean follow-up period was 16.5 months (range, 12 to 24 months). The clinical results of the meniscus repair were evaluated by symptoms (such as catching or locking), tenderness, effusion, range of motion limitation, and the McMurray test. Clinical success was defined by negative results in all five categories. The Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score was evaluated. Objective results were evaluated with secondary look arthroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI results were categorized as completely repaired, incompletely repaired, and failure by Henning''s classification. The results of second-look arthroscopy were evaluated with the criteria of meniscal healing.

Results

The clinical success rate was 95.4% and the HSS scores were 93.9 ± 5.4 at the final follow-up. According to Henning''s classification, 15 out of 18 cases showed complete healing (83.3%) and two cases (11.1%) showed incomplete healing. Seventeen out of 18 cases that underwent second-look arthroscopy showed complete healing (94.4%) according to the criteria of meniscal healing. Only one case showed failure and the failure was due to a re-rupture at the sutured area. Complications of ACL reconstruction or meniscus repair were not present.

Conclusions

The results demonstrate that arthroscopic all-inside repair using the Meniscal Viper Repair System is an effective treatment method when it is performed simultaneously with ACL reconstruction.     

Editorial Commentary: Early Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Decreases the Risk of Developing Irreparable Meniscus Tears in Female Athletes

There has been a substantial increase in the participation of women in sports since the passage of Title IX in 1972. With increased participation has come a rise in athletic injuries, including anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Numerous factors (modifiable and nonmodifiable) contribute to the 2 to 8 times increased risk of ACL tears in female compared with male athletes. The sports with the greatest risk of ACL injury include cutting sports such as soccer (1.1% per season), basketball (0.9% per season), volleyball, and lacrosse. In addition, female patients have a 33.7% greater risk of a subsequent contralateral ACL tear. Approximately 70% of ACL tears are the result of noncontact injuries. Numerous factors contribute to the increased risk of ACL tears in female athletes, including nonmodifiable (hormonal fluctuations, sex differences in knee geometry) and modifiable risk factors (neuromuscular control). Injury-prevention programs focus on modifiable risk factors and have been shown to be incredibly effective, decreasing the risk of ACL tears up to 50%. ACL tears commonly are associated with meniscus tears, including medial meniscus ramp and lateral posterior root lesions; therefore, thorough assessment is critical to identify this pathology. Early ACL reconstruction (i.e., <12 months following injury) increases the likelihood of being able to repair meniscus tears. Given the much greater risk of ACL tears and lower rate of return to sport in female athletes, this group warrants special attention to identify and treat these injuries earlier and subsequently improve overall outcomes.     

Strong association of meniscus tears with complete Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries relative to partial ACL injuries

BackgroundAnterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries are often associated with meniscus tears. These meniscus tears in long term may affect the functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction. The present study aims to identify the incidence and relative association of meniscus injuries in complete and partial ACL injuries.MethodsThis was a retrospective study. Patients were divided into 2 groups; group I: partial ACL tear and group 2: complete ACL tear. Both groups were assessed for meniscal tears; either isolated medial/lateral or combined and odds ratio was measured between two groups.ResultsA total of 43 and 219 patients were enrolled in group I and II respectively. The mean age (years) in group I and II were 25.32 ± 7.12 and 28.64 ± 10.84 respectively. There were a total of 5 and 28 females in group I and II respectively. Mean pre-injury Tegner score in group I and II was 7.02 ± 2.87 and 6.82 ± 3.14 respectively. Mean time from injury to surgery (months) in group I and II was 8.04 ± 6.43 and 7.62 ± 4.83 respectively. In group 1 There were a total of 6 with lateral meniscus tears, 9 with medial meniscus tears And 3 with combined meniscal tears in group 1 while in group 2, 47 had lateral meniscal tears, 71 had medial meniscal tears and 71 had combined tears. Group II patients had stronger association for isolated meniscal tears compared to group I, with an odds ratio of 5.05(p < 0.05). Combined meniscal tears had non-significant relation in two groups (p = 0.58).ConclusionPartial ACL injuries present with less risk of acquiring isolated meniscus tears, compared to complete ACL injuries.     

A comparison of accuracy between clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament tears

A prospective and retrospective study was undertaken to compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with clinical examination in diagnosing meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Pathological findings were then confirmed during arthroscopy. One hundred fifty-four patients clinically diagnosed with a meniscal or ACL tear who ultimately had arthroscopic knee surgery were evaluated; 100 patients underwent clinical examination followed by MRI, and 54 underwent clinical examination alone. The presence or absence of meniscal and ACL tears was confirmed during arthroscopy. The accuracies of clinical examination and MRI were compared for the 100 patients who underwent both clinical examination and MRI. The accuracy of MRI was 75% for medial meniscal tears, 69% for lateral meniscal tears and 98% for ACL tears. The accuracy of clinical examination was 82% for medial meniscal tears, 76% for lateral meniscal tears and 99% for complete tears of the ACL. Furthermore, the accuracy of clinical examination for the 54 patients who underwent clinical examination alone was not significantly different from the accuracy of clinical examination in the 100 patients who also underwent MRI. There was no significant difference between the accuracy of clinical examination and MRI in the diagnosis of meniscal and ACL tears and, overall, MRI contributed to treatment in only 16 of 100 cases. Based on these findings, we feel that MRI, except in certain circumstances, is an expensive and unnecessary diagnostic test in patients with suspected meniscal and ACL pathology.     

Suture of new and old peripheral meniscus tears

A prospective study of repaired vertical peripheral tears of the meniscus in fifty patients (nine women and forty-one men) was carried out from January 1977 to June 1980. All tears were confirmed preoperatively by arthroscopy. Forty-three medial and seven lateral menisci were repaired. Fifteen tears were treated within two weeks and thirty-five were operated on as long as seven years after injury. Only eight patients had a meniscal tear that was not accompanied by injuries of either the anterior cruciate ligament or the collateral ligaments, or both. At a mean follow-up of eighteen months (range, six to thirty-nine months), forty-two patients (84 per cent) had clinically apparent healing of the sutured meniscal tear. Repeat arthroscopy was done in twenty-seven (64 per cent) of these patients, four to twenty-nine months (mean, twelve months) after the operation. The arthroscopy proved that all of these repaired tears had healed. Eight patients had a second tear after the initial repair: four were reruptures at the sutured area and four were new ruptures in another area of the meniscus and were associated with fresh trauma. All of these patients subsequently had an arthroscopic meniscectomy.     

关节镜下套管针缝合在军事训练致半月板损伤中的应用

目的评价膝关节镜下半月板缝合术在军事训练致半月板损伤中的应用效果。方法应用膝关节镜及套管针对45例半月板损伤患者关节镜下行半月板缝合术。结果45例均在关节镜下顺利完成缝合修复手术,平均手术时间60min。随访6-24个月。按Ikeuchi膝关节评分标准评定疗效：优30例,良9例,中6例,优良率86.6%。结论关节镜下套管针缝合术是治疗半月板损伤理想的方法。     

Outcomes of meniscal repair: minimum of 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the success rate of meniscal repair achieved in our sports medicine practice, particularly with interest in characterizing the outcomes observed with the newer all-inside repair devices. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective chart review with telephone follow-up. METHODS: 157 patients that had undergone a meniscal repair procedure between 1996 and 2001 were identified. Twenty-four of these patients were lost to follow-up. Thus, the study group consisted of 133 patients providing a follow-up rate of 85%. All patients included had a minimum of two years of follow up. Failure was defined as the need for meniscectomy in the area of the meniscus that was initially repaired. The time interval from injury to surgery was divided into less than six weeks (acute) and greater than six weeks (chronic). The etiology of the meniscal tear was broken down into three categories; sports related trauma, non-sports trauma, and atraumatic. The repair techniques used in these patients included outside-in sutures, inside-out sutures, darts, arrows, meniscal screws, T-fix, FasT-fix, and the RapidLoc. RESULTS: The failure rate was 36%. No association was found between failure and the length of preoperative symptoms, rim width, etiology, concomitant meniscectomy, chondroplasty or anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. There was a higher rate of failure of tears in the medial versus lateral meniscus (20.3% vs. 44.8%). No statistical comparisons could be made between devices due to small sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS: The all-inside meniscal repair devices have simplified the meniscal repair procedure. This may have lead to a broadening of the indications for repair CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The newer generation meniscal repair devices, while simplifying the procedure, do not appear to lead to an increased clinical success rate.     

Approach to meniscal tears in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

It is generally accepted that meniscus repair in a knee with persistent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency leads to a higher retear rate, and that meniscal repair in conjunction with ACL reconstruction is associated with a higher rate of meniscal healing compared with patients who do not undergo ACL reconstruction. In this article, we will review the background of thses concepts and present treatment strtegies for meniscal tears in ACL-insufficient knees, with particular attention to meniscal repair and meniscal allograft transplanatation.     

Die arthroskopische Meniskusrefixation mit einem All-inside-Nahtsystem

OBJECTIVE: Application of an arthroscopic suture system to restore the form and function of the meniscus by adaptation of a longitudinal tear close to the base. INDICATIONS: Unstable longitudinal tears near the base of the meniscus, mainly in the posterior horn of the medial or lateral of the meniscus. Dislocated bucket-handle tears of the medial and lateral meniscus close to the base. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Poor tissue quality with fibrillated meniscal tissue. Meniscal tears in the avascular zone (zone I). Insufficient blood supply from the joint capsule and the base of the meniscus. Degenerative meniscal lesions. Anterior or posterior knee joint instability. Allergic reactions to nonresorbable suture material. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Standard anterior arthroscopic portals. Arthroscopic assessment of the meniscal tear using the probe. Revitalization of the tear margins and perforation of the meniscal base to induce bleeding. Adaptation of the tear margins and fixation with a suture-anchor system using an ipsilateral standard portal for tears in the posterior horn or by way of a contralateral standard portal for tears in the lateral horn. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Full weight bearing with the knee in extension in a knee immobilizer, relative to the pain threshold in the 1st postoperative week. Range of motion exercises without weight bearing from full extension to 90 degrees knee flexion (0/0/90). If simultaneous reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is being performed, rehabilitation protocols follow the principles for ACL reconstruction. RESULTS: Since the year 2000, meniscal tears in more than 300 patients have been repaired with the all-inside suture system. In the context of a multicenter study by ESSKA (European Society for Sports Medicine, Surgery and Arthroscopy) involving 20 patients, the result was evaluated by direct MRI arthrography (gadolinium). The suture bar anchors were generally not detectable, the incision channels produced a hypodense signal in the meniscus tissue. If re-rupture occurred, it was because the meniscus had pulled out of the suture loop. Cartilaginous lesions were not found. There were no complications related to the nonresorbable suture bar anchors.