Fluoroscopically guided epidural blood patch in patients with postdural puncture headache after spinal and epidural anesthesia

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the major complications after spinal and epidural anesthesia. An epidural blood patch (EBP) may be applied when PDPH persists regardless of conservative treatment. We describe the results of management including fluoroscopically guided EBP in a series of patients with moderate to severe PDPH. From January 2007 to December 2009, PDPH developed in 15 of 3,381 patients (0.44%) who received epidural or spinal anesthesia: 5 (0.21%) after general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia, 8 (0.81%) after spinal anesthesia, and 2 (3.14%) after combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Of 15 patients, PDPH was relieved without the EBP in 9 patients and 6 patients required the EBP. EBP was performed under fluoroscopy in a prone position; a 4:1 mixture of autologous blood and contrast medium was injected to cover the site of dural puncture. The success rate of fluoroscopically guided EBP was 100% with a mean blood volume of 7.2 ml. No complications were associated with EBP except for a mild backache. Fluoroscopically guided EBP may be successfully and safely performed to treat persistent PDPH with a relatively small volume of blood for epidural injection.     

Treatment of post-dural-puncture headache with intravenous cortisone

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is the most frequent complication of procedures involving dural penetration for spinal anesthesia or following unintentional dural puncture during attempted epidural anesthesia or analgesia. PDPH causes serious problems for women who have just given birth, as they are unable to give adequate care to their infants. The causes of PDPH are poorly understood and treatments are therefore various and symptomatic; most are empirical and not all are effective. When conservative measures fail, an alternative that may be proposed is the blood patch, an invasive technique which is not without risk and which many patients reject. We report three cases of incapacitating PDPH in women after vaginal or caesarian delivery in which symptoms resolved with intravenous hydrocortisone treatment. Hydrocortisone treatment for PDPH has never been reported in the literature, but given our results, we consider that clinical trials are warranted to establish the efficacy of this treatment and to determine if there is a chance that it might offer an alternative to the blood patch.     

Subdural hematoma after atraumatic spinal

We report a case of subdural hematoma in a 68-year-old white man who underwent left inguinal hernia repair with spinal anesthesia. The patient had a postdural puncture headache (PDPH) on postoperative day 4, but he refused invasive treatment. Instead, he self-administered acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine. On postoperative day 11, he was diagnosed with a subdural hematoma. At 49 days postoperatively, a computed axial tomographic scan was taken, the results of which were normal, after no surgical intervention. This patient had none of the risk factors as reported in the literature for this rare complication. Although a headache postoperatively, after spinal anesthesia, is often assumed to be PDPH, clinicians should not rule out the possibility of subdural hematoma, especially if the headache is persistent. We advise that the smallest-bore spinal needles be used when administering spinal anesthesia and that patients be carefully evaluated before their surgery for use of anticoagulants, herbal medications, or history of cerebrovascular disease. Immediate treatment of the PDPH with an epidural blood patch should be considered. If a patient refuses invasive treatment, he should be counseled for the possibility of subdural hematoma. The patient also should be advised to avoid medications with anticoagulant properties.     

Prevention of post‐dural puncture headache in parturients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Post‐dural puncture headaches (PDPHs) present an important clinical problem. We assessed methods to decrease accidental dural punctures (ADPs) and interventions to reduce PDPH following ADP. Multiple electronic databases were searched for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of parturients having labour epidurals, in which the studied intervention could plausibly affect ADP or PDPH, and the incidence of at least one of these was recorded. Forty RCTs (n = 11,536 epidural insertions) were included, studying combined spinal–epidurals (CSEs), loss of resistance medium, prophylactic epidural blood patches, needle bevel orientation, ultrasound‐guided insertion, epidural morphine, Special Sprotte needles, acoustic‐guided insertion, administration of cosyntropin, and continuous spinal analgesia. The RCTs for CSE, loss of resistance medium, and prophylactic epidural blood patches were meta‐analysed. Five methods reduced PDPH: prophylactic epidural blood patch {four trials, median quality score = 2, risk difference = ?0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI): ?0.88 to ?0.086]}, lateral positioning of the epidural needle bevel upon insertion (one trial, quality score = 1), Special Sprotte needles [one trial, quality score = 5, risk difference = ?0.44 (95% CI: ?0.67 to ?0.21)], epidural morphine [one trial, quality score = 4, risk difference = ?0.36 (95% CI ?0.59 to ?0.13)], and cosyntropin [one trial, quality score = 5, risk difference = ?0.36 (95% CI ?0.55 to ?0.16)]. Several methods potentially reduce PDPH. Special Sprotte needles, epidural morphine, and cosyntropin are thus far each supported by a single, albeit good quality trial. Prophylactic blood patches are supported by three trials, but these had flawed methodology. Mostly, trials were of limited quality, and further well‐conducted, large studies are needed.     

PDPH is a common complication of neuraxial blockade in parturients: a meta-analysis of obstetrical studies

PURPOSE: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is an iatrogenic complication of neuraxial blockade. We systematically reviewed the literature on parturients to determine the frequency, onset, and duration of PDPH. METHODS: Citations on PDPH in the obstetrical population were identified by computerized searches, citation review, and hand searches of abstracts and conference proceedings. Citations were included if they contained extractable data on frequency, onset, or duration of PDPH. Using meta-analysis, we calculated pooled estimates of the frequency of accidental dural puncture for epidural needles and pooled estimates of the frequencies of PDPH for epidural and spinal needles. RESULTS: Parturients have approximately a 1.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5% to 1.5%) risk of accidental dural puncture with epidural insertion. Of these, approximately half (52.1%; 95% CI, 51.4% to 52.8%) will result in PDPH. The risk of PDPH from spinal needles diminishes with small diameter, atraumatic needles, but is still appreciable (Whitacre 27-gauge needle 1.7%; 95% CI, 1.6% to 1.8%). PDPH occurs as early as one day and as late as seven days after dural puncture and lasts 12 hr to seven days. CONCLUSION: PDPH is a common complication for parturients undergoing neuraxial blockade.     

Epidural blood patch for management of postdural puncture headache in adolescents

BACKGROUND: In some patients spinal puncture (SP) is followed by postdural puncture headache (PDPH). When the symptoms of PDPH are severe and are not relieved within a few days an epidural blood patch (EBP) might be performed. The aim of this survey was to review requests for EBPs and to evaluate the effectiveness of EBP in patients aged 13-18 years during a 6.5 year period ending in June 2001. METHODS: The Information System Patient Measures Database was interrogated to identify patients who were referred for EBP. After identification, the patients' medical records were reviewed in detail for the characteristics of PDPH and other symptoms, and for the effectiveness of the EBP. RESULTS: Forty-two EBPs were performed after 40 SPs on 37 patients (24 girls, 13 boys). Epidural blood patches were performed twice in five patients. The reasons for repeating the procedure were repeat SP with new PDPH in three patients and an unsatisfactory effect in two patients. Twenty-eight of the 40 spinal punctures (70%) had been performed for diagnostic use and 10 (25%) for spinal anesthesia. Two patients (5%) developed PDPH after inadvertent dural puncture with an epidural needle. In 37 cases the criteria for PDPH were fulfilled, and one patient had a cerebrospinal fluid fistula headache. Two-thirds of the girls had associated symptoms of headache compared with one-third of the boys. Epidural blood patch was performed 1-22 days after SP with 0.2 ml/kg (mean) of autologous blood injected into the epidural space. The success rate of the first injection was 37 out of 40 EBP (93%), and the second injection was effective in both patients with recurred PDPH. CONCLUSION: Epidural blood patch seems to be an effective and safe procedure in adolescents for treating severe and persistent PDPH.     

Postdural puncture headache: a randomized comparison of five spinal needles in obstetric patients

This prospective, blinded, randomized study compares the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and the epidural blood patch (EBP) rate for five spinal needles when used in obstetric patients. One thousand two women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were recruited. We used two cutting needles: 26-gauge Atraucan and 25-gauge Quincke, and three pencil-point needles: 24-gauge Gertie Marx (GM), 24-gauge Sprotte, and 25-gauge Whitacre. The needle for each weekday was chosen randomly. Cutting needles were inserted parallel to the dural fibers. The incidences of PDPH were, respectively, 5%, 8.7%, 4%, 2.8%, and 3.1% for Atraucan, Quincke, GM, Sprotte, and Whitacre needles (P = 0.04, chi(2) analysis), and the corresponding EBP rates in those with PDPH were 55%, 66%, 12.5%, 0%, and 0% (P = 0.000). The Quincke needle had a more frequent PDPH rate than the Sprotte or the Whitacre needle (P = 0.02) and a more frequent EBP rate than the GM, Sprotte, or the Whitacre needle (P = 0.01). The Atraucan needle had a more frequent EBP rate than the Sprotte or Whitacre needle (P = 0.05). Neither the PDPH rate nor the EBP rates differed among the pencil-point needles. The cost of EBP must be taken into consideration when choosing a spinal needle. We conclude that pencil-point spinal needles should be used for subarachnoid anesthesia in obstetric patients.     

Postdural puncture headache: a randomized prospective comparison of the 24 gauge Sprotte and the 27 gauge Quincke needles in young patients

This study was designed to compare the frequency of postdural puncture headaches (PDPH) using the 24 gauge Sprotte and the 27 gauge Quincke spinal needles in a population of patients less than 45 yr of age undergoing spinal anaesthesia for nonobstetrical surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive spinal anaesthesia with either the 24 gauge Sprotte spinal needle (n = 46) or the 27 gauge Quincke spinal needle (n = 47). Patients were interviewed on either postoperative day one or two and on postoperative day three. A PDPH was defined as a headache involving the occipital or frontal areas that is made worse when assuming either the sitting or standing position. Ninety-three patients were included in the analysis of data. The overall incidence of PDPH was 14% (13 of 93), and no difference was found between the Sprotte (15.2%) and Quincke (12.8%) needles. The distribution of the PDPHs by severity was not different between the two groups. None of the 13 patients with PDPHs required an epidural blood patch for relief of symptoms. Both the Sprotte needle and the Quincke needles were judged as easy to use and both required the same number of attempts in order to locate cerebrospinal fluid (first attempt successful: 73.9% versus 66%). Neither patient satisfaction nor the acceptability of spinal anaesthesia for a future procedure was adversely affected by the occurrence of a PDPH. The results of this study suggest that the risk of PDPH after spinal anaesthesia in young patients is similar using either the 24 gauge Sprotte or the 27 gauge Quincke spinal needle.     

Decreased incidence of headache after unintentional dural puncture in patients with cesarean delivery administered with postoperative epidural analgesia

Purpose  To investigate how subsequent placement of a catheter into the epidural space after unintentional dural puncture for postoperative analgesia for 36–72 h affected the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Methods  The records of 52 parturients who had had accidental dural puncture in cesarean delivery were reviewed. The parturients were assigned to two groups. Twenty-eight parturients were assigned to the study group, in whom an epidural catheter was inserted and was used for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Twenty-four parturients were assigned to the control group, in whom spinal anesthesia (n = 20) or general anesthesia (n = 4) was applied. For postoperative analgesia in patients with incision pain above visual analog scale (VAS) 3, 3 mg morphine in 15 ml saline was administered through the epidural catheter in the study group, while intramuscular meperidine or tramadol was administered in the control group. Once PDPH was observed, conservative treatment was tried first. If the headache persisted despite conservative treatment, an epidural blood patch was applied through the catheter or a reinserted epidural needle. Results  The study group demonstrated significant reduction of the incidence of PDPH and reduction in the indication for an epidural blood patch compared to the control group (7.1% vs 58% [P = 0.000] and 3.6% vs 37.5% [P = 0.002], respectively). Conclusion  Subsequent catheter placement into the epidural space after unintentional dural puncture in cesarean delivery and leaving the catheter for postoperative analgesia for 36–72 h may reduce the incidence of PDPH.     

Postpunktioneller Kopfschmerz

Headache following dural puncture is a typical complication of neuraxial analgesia and can impair the ability to perform activities of daily living up to incapacitation. The use of thin, atraumatic needles and special puncture techniques (e.g. reinsertion of the stylet) can prevent the majority of post-dural puncture headaches (PDPH). One of the most effective measures to prevent headache after accidental dural puncture is the intrathecal or epidural administration of morphine. When the diagnosis of PDPH is confirmed after excluding relevant differential diagnoses, some of which are potentially life-threatening, caffeine, theophylline and non-opioid analgesics are effective agents to reduce the severity of the symptoms. Traditional measures, such as strict bed rest and hyperhydration can no longer be recommended. If invasive treatment of the headache is warranted an epidural blood patch is still the method of choice with a high rate of success.     

Efficacy of a Prophylactic Epidural Blood Patch in Preventing Post Dural Puncture Headache in Parturients after Inadvertent Dural Puncture

Background: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) occurs in up to 80% of parturients who experience inadvertent dural puncture during epidural catheter placement. The authors performed a randomized double blind study to assess the effect of prophylactic epidural blood patch on the incidence of PDPH and the need for therapeutic epidural blood patch.

Methods: Sixty-four parturients who incurred inadvertent dural puncture were randomized to receive a prophylactic epidural blood patch with 20 ml autologous blood (prophylactic epidural blood patch group) or a sham patch (sham group). Subjects were evaluated daily for development of PDPH for a minimum of 5 days after dural puncture. Those who developed a PDPH were followed daily for a minimum of 3 days after resolution of the headache. Subjects with moderate headaches who reported difficulties performing childcare activities and all those with severe headaches were advised to receive a therapeutic epidural blood patch.

Results: Eighteen of 32 subjects in each group (56%) developed PDPH. Therapeutic blood patch was recommended in similar numbers of patients in each group. The groups had similar onset time of PDPH, median peak pain scores, and number of days spent unable to perform childcare activities as a result of postural headache. The median duration of PDPH, however, was shorter in the prophylactic epidural blood patch group.     

Efficacy of a prophylactic epidural blood patch in preventing post dural puncture headache in parturients after inadvertent dural puncture

BACKGROUND: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) occurs in up to 80% of parturients who experience inadvertent dural puncture during epidural catheter placement. The authors performed a randomized double blind study to assess the effect of prophylactic epidural blood patch on the incidence of PDPH and the need for therapeutic epidural blood patch. METHODS: Sixty-four parturients who incurred inadvertent dural puncture were randomized to receive a prophylactic epidural blood patch with 20 ml autologous blood (prophylactic epidural blood patch group) or a sham patch (sham group). Subjects were evaluated daily for development of PDPH for a minimum of 5 days after dural puncture. Those who developed a PDPH were followed daily for a minimum of 3 days after resolution of the headache. Subjects with moderate headaches who reported difficulties performing childcare activities and all those with severe headaches were advised to receive a therapeutic epidural blood patch. RESULTS: Eighteen of 32 subjects in each group (56%) developed PDPH. Therapeutic blood patch was recommended in similar numbers of patients in each group. The groups had similar onset time of PDPH, median peak pain scores, and number of days spent unable to perform childcare activities as a result of postural headache. The median duration of PDPH, however, was shorter in the prophylactic epidural blood patch group. CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in the incidence of PDPH or the need for criteria-directed therapeutic epidural patch was not detected when a prophylactic epidural blood patch was administered to parturients after inadvertent dural puncture. However, prophylactic epidural blood patch did shorten the duration of PDPH symptoms.     

Post-dural puncture headache in the parturient

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most common and debilitating complications of neuraxial blockade in the parturient. The obstetric population is at particular risk with up to 80% of women developing symptoms after inadvertent dural puncture during epidural insertion. PDPH typically develops 24–48 hours post-puncture and is classically described as an occipito-frontal headache with postural features. Diagnosis and assessment should include consideration of other potential causes of post-partum headache. At the time of inadvertent dural puncture (IDP) one may insert an intrathecal catheter, re-site the epidural or use alternative analgesia. Initial treatment of a PDPH includes bed rest, adequate hydration and simple analgesics. Epidural blood patch (EBP) remains the gold standard treatment of PDPH.     

Factors involved in the incidence of post-dural puncture headache with the 25 gauge Whitacre needle for obstetric anesthesia

Parturients have the greatest risk of postdural puncture headache. use of a pencil-point needle, such as the 25 gauge Whitacre, has been associated with a lower incidence of PDPH. This observational study of 1009 obstetrical patients assessed possible factors related to the incidence of PDPH and other complications associated with spinal anesthesia using the 25 gauge Whitacre needle. The independent variables included procedure, maternal position at insertion, ease of insertion, intraoperative i.v. analgesia supplementation, use of intrathecal narcotics, parity and type of local anesthetic. Patients were followed daily during their hospitalization and questioned specifically about the presence of headache, its nature, onset and treatment. Two hundred and twenty-nine patients developed a headache postperatively but only 25 had postdural puncture headaches (overall incidence 2.5%). The PDPH typically presented on day 2 (median), range 1-4). Six patients (0.59%) required epidural blood patch. There were eight (0.8%) failed finals which were converted to general anesthesia. None of the factors evaluated were significant in predicting the occurrence of PDPH.     

Is epidural dexamethasone effective in preventing postdural puncture headache?

BackgroundPostdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the common complications of spinal anesthesia; it is observed in 1–40% of cases involving spinal anesthesia. It can cause considerable morbidity and 40% of cases may require invasive treatments such as epidural blood patch. With the exception of invasive treatments such as an epidural blood patch, current standard treatment modalities have not proved efficacious. There had been some research done that indicated successful prophylaxis and/or treatment of PDPH by administration of intravenous steroids. Based on those findings, we hypothesize that a direct injection of corticosteroids to the anesthesia puncture site could increase the amount of corticosteroid that accumulates in the puncture site, and will be more effective in decreasing dural inflammation and incidence of PDPH than that of parenteral steroids. We formulated our study to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone directly injected into spinal anesthesia puncture sites.MethodsA total of 268 patients undergoing spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups; one group received a prophylactic epidural injection of dexamethasone (2 mL, 8 mg) and the other group received 2 mL of normal saline. The incidence and intensity of PDPH and puncture site backache were each measured at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days after spinal anesthesia. The intensity of the headache was graded according to the meningeal headache index.ResultsThe overall incidence of headache during the 7-day period was 5 patients (3.7%) in the control group and 11 patients (8.2%) in the study group, which is not statistically significant (X² = 2.393 and p = 0.122. The severity of headache also shows no statistical significance (2.2% in cases versus 6% in controls; z = 1.53, p = 0.126). The intensity of headache reported at the 24 hours (z = 0.698; p = 0.485), 72 hours (z = 0.849; p = 0.396), and 7 days (z = 0.008; p = 0.994) was not different. There also was no difference in the incidence of backache in the two groups.ConclusionIn contrast to other studies that showed the efficacy of intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention and treatment of PDPH, our study did not show any significant effect of prophylactic epidural injection of dexamethasone in prevention of PDPH. However regarding the low number of PDPH in routine cases, evaluation of this intervention in groups with a high incidence of PDPH by using of particulate steroids is recommended to confirm these preliminary findings.     

Utility of ultrasound imaging for epidural blood patch in postdural puncture headache patients after caesarean section

Although epidural blood patch (EBP) is an effective treatment for postdural puncture headache (PDPH), the adequate blood volume has not been determined. We reported two cases of EBP for PDPH after caesarean section with spinal anesthesia using ultrasound imaging with a 2-5 MHz convex probe. In case 1, the dura mater was expanded and subarachnoid space was compressed by 8 ml of autologous blood with paresthesia at bilateral L5 area during EBP and blood infusion was finished at 10 ml. In case 2, although the area of the epidural space was unchanged by 17 ml of EBP, contrast of the epidural space was altered in as a mosaic pattern. We conclude that ultrasound imaging is useful to confirm the adequate blood infusion during EBP Therefore, there is a possibility of estimating the optimal blood volume by ultrasound imaging.     

A comparative multicentre trial of spinal needles for Caesarean section

We studied 681 patients in a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, parallel group trial designed to assess the incidence of headache following spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section using four different pencil point spinal needles. The needles used were: Whitacre 25G ( n  = 170), Polymedic 25G ( n  = 170), Sprotte 24G ( n  = 173) and Polymedic 24G ( n  = 168). The incidence of all headaches prior to discharge was 11.1%. Only five headaches (0.75%) were severe with features of post dural puncture headache (PDPH) and required an epidural blood patch: Whitacre 25G = 0, Polymedic 25G = 1 (0.6%), Sprotte 24G = 2 (1.2%), Polymedic 24G = 2 (1.2%). There was no statistically significant difference between the four groups for PDPH. We conclude that all four needles studied performed satisfactorily and comparably.     

Comparison of 26- and 27-G needles for spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery patients.

Seven hundred thirty ambulatory surgery patients, randomly assigned to receive spinal anesthesia with a 26- or 27-G needle, were studied for the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), postoperative back pain, and patient acceptance. The incidence of PDPH following the use of 26- and 27-G needles was 9.6% and 1.5%, respectively (P less than 0.05). The incidence of PDPH was 5.7% among men and 13.4% among women following the use of 26-G needles (P less than 0.05), whereas no difference between men and women was noted after the use of 27-G needles. Of the patients who were 40 yr of age or younger, the overall incidence of PDPH was 11.9%, with a 7.5% incidence among men and a 16.4% among women following the use of 26-G needles (P less than 0.05) and a 1.8% incidence of PDPH following the use of 27-G needles, with no statistical difference between genders. Postoperative back pain was experienced in 18.3% of the patients in the 26-G group and 20.2% in the 27-G group (difference not significant). Favorable acceptance of spinal anesthesia was reported in 89.4% of patients in the 26-G group and 98.2% in the 27-G group (P less than 0.01). Results from this study demonstrate that, in patients who received spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery, the use of 27-G needles resulted in a significantly lower incidence of PDPH and greater patient acceptance compared with the use of 26-G needles. The incidence of postoperative back pain was not significantly different between the two groups.     

Intrathecal catheterisation after observed accidental dural puncture in labouring women: update of a meta-analysis and a trial-sequential analysis

BackgroundOur meta-analysis from 2013 showed that inserting a catheter intrathecally after an observed accidental dural puncture can reduce the need for epidural blood patch in labouring women requesting epidural analgesia. We updated our conventional meta-analysis and added a trial-sequential analysis (TSA).MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies that compared inserting the catheter intrathecally with an epidural catheter re-site or with no intervention. The extracted data were pooled and the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) was calculated, using the random effects model. A contour-enhanced funnel plot was constructed. A TSA was performed and the cumulative Z score, monitoring and futility boundaries were constructed.ResultsOur search identified 13 studies, reporting on 1653 patients, with a low risk of bias. The RR for the incidence of PDPH was 0.82 (95%CI 0.71 to 0.95) and the RR for the need for epidural blood patch was 0.62 (95%CI 0.49 to 0.79); heterogeneity of both analyses was high. The TSA showed that the monitoring or futility boundaries were not crossed, indicating insufficient data to exclude a type I error of statistical analysis. Contour-enhanced funnel plots were symmetric, suggesting no publication bias.ConclusionsConventional meta-analyses showed for the first time that intrathecal catheterisation can reduce the incidence of PDPH. However, TSA did not corroborate this finding. Despite increasing use in clinical practice there is no firm evidence on which to base a definite conclusion.     

Management of postdural puncture headache with epidural blood patch in children

BACKGROUND: Until the last decade, it was believed that postdural puncture headache (PDPH) was an uncommon complaint in children, but recent studies indicate that young children may develop PDPH after spinal puncture. When the symptoms are severe and are not relieved within a few days with analgesics, forced hydration and bed rest, then epidural blood patch (EBP) might be performed. METHODS: In this retrospective survey, we analysed EBP performed in Kuopio University Hospital between the years 1995 and 2000. RESULTS: During the 6-year period, seven EBP were performed in children aged 12 years or younger. Four out of the seven children had undergone a diagnostic spinal puncture, two had spinal anaesthesia and one child had spinal puncture for treatment of postoperative hygroma. Five children had a typical PDPH, one child had a cerebrospinal fluid fistula headache and one child had a headache similar to his migraine. EBP was performed 2-19 days after spinal puncture with 0.3 ml.kg-1 (mean) of autologous blood injected into the epidural space. CONCLUSIONS: EBP gave some relief of symptoms in all children. No complications related to EBP were noticed.