Results of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Thin Melanoma

Background Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been shown to be a highly accurate method of staging nodal basins in melanoma patients. Although this technique is widely accepted in patients with intermediate-thickness tumors, it is unclear what the indications are for thin (≤1 mm) melanoma. Methods From May 1991 to October 2004, 223 patients with thin melanoma underwent SLN biopsy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Most patients with thin melanoma were selected for the procedure because of high-risk clinicopathologic features. Results Nodal metastases were found in eight patients (3.6%) who underwent SLN biopsy. All positive SLNs were found in patients with ≥.75 mm-thick and Clark level IV melanoma (8 of 114; 7%). Age, sex, tumor location, thickness, Clark level, ulceration, regression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, mitotic rate, and number of mapped nodal basins were not predictive of positive SLNs (χ²; P = not significant). With a median follow-up of 25 months, there have been no recurrences or deaths in patients with melanoma <.75 mm. Six patients have had regional and/or systemic recurrences (2.7%), only one of whom had a positive SLN. Three patients have died of melanoma; all had negative SLNs. Conclusions Nodal metastasis in thin melanoma is uncommon, especially in patients with <.75 mm and Clark level II or III melanoma. In our experience, no single clinicopathologic factor was predictive of nodal metastases. The prognostic implications of positive SLNs in thin melanoma remain undefined.     

Lymph Node Tumor Volumes in Patients Undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Cutaneous Melanoma

Background: Regional lymph node tumor volumes in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy (SNB) for treatment of cutaneous melanoma have not been described. The objectives of this study were to describe the lymph node tumor volumes typically seen in this population and to correlate tumor volumes with tumor thickness and positive SN characteristics.Methods: Review of a consecutive series of patients with clinically localized cutaneous melanoma who underwent SNB of nonpalpable regional lymph node basins followed by complete lymphadenectomy (LND) was performed. Multiple lymph node sections from positive SNs and nonsentinel nodes (NSNs) in LND specimens were examined microscopically. Individual tumor deposit diameters were measured using an ocular micrometer. Aggregate tumor volumes were calculated for SN and LND specimens. Tumor volumes and SN and LND positivity rates were correlated with tumor thickness, the number of positive SNs, and the presence of multiple SN tumor deposits.Results: SNB procedures were performed for 149 melanomas in 189 regional nodal basins. The mean tumor depth was 2.48 mm. The mean number of SNs/basin was 2.1. Thirty-two of 149 SNB procedures (21.5%) revealed a total of 34 nodal basins with at least one positive SN. The median tumor volume in positive SNs was 4.7 mm³ (range, 0.1-3618 mm³; mean, 209 mm³). The median aggregate tumor volume in positive LND specimens was 4.9 mm³ (range, 0.1-3618 mm³; mean, 224 mm³). Six basins (17.6%) contained at least one positive NSN. The regional node aggregate tumor volume correlated weakly with tumor thickness (Pearsons correlation coefficient = .302, P = .0934). NSN positivity was not predicted by tumor thickness, American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor stage, number of positive SNs, or number of metastatic deposits within SNs.Conclusions: Most melanoma-positive SNs contain minute tumor volumes. Tumor thickness and patterns of SN metastases may not be predictive of tumor burden or the presence of positive NSNs.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Patients With Cutaneous Desmoplastic Melanoma

Background: Although desmoplastic melanoma (DM) often presents at a locally advanced stage, nodal metastases are rare. We describe our experience with lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with DM to characterize the biological behavior of these tumors.Methods: Twenty-seven patients with cutaneous DM underwent wide excision and attempted SLNB between 1996 and 2001. All pathology was reviewed by a single dermatopathologist (KB). Clinical and histological features were recorded.Results: There were 20 male and 7 female patients. The median age was 64 years (range, 35–83 years). The head and neck was the most commonly involved anatomical region (n = 14). The median Breslow thickness was 2.2 mm. Twenty-four patients underwent successful SLNB. No patient had a positive sentinel node. At a median follow-up of 27 months, five patients recurred (four systemic and one local); all five had undergone successful SLNB. Two of these patients died of disease, two are alive with disease, and one remains alive and disease free. No patient experienced failure in a regional nodal basin.Conclusions:DM is a biologically distinct form of melanoma, with a very low incidence of regional lymph node metastases, either at presentation or in long-term follow-up. This biology should be considered when designing rational treatment strategies for these patients.     

Impact of False-Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Survival in Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma

Background and Objectives Sentinel lymph node biopsy is widely accepted as standard care in melanoma despite lack of pertinent randomized trials results. A possible pitfall of this procedure is the inaccurate identification of the sentinel lymph node leading to biopsy and analysis of a nonsentinel node. Such a technical failure may yield a different prognosis. The purpose of this study is to analyze the incidence of false negativity and its impact on clinical outcome and to try to understand its causes. Methods The Melanoma Data Base at National Cancer Institute of Naples was analyzed comparing results between false-negative and tumor-positive sentinel node patients focusing on overall survival and prognostic factors influencing the clinical outcome. Results One hundred fifty-one cases were diagnosed to be tumor-positive after sentinel lymph node biopsy and were subjected to complete lymph node dissection. Thirty-four (18.4%)patients with tumor-negative sentinel node subsequently developed lymph node metastases in the basin site of the sentinel procedure. With a median follow-up of 42.8 months the 5-year overall survival was 48.4% and 66.3% for false-negative and tumor-positive group respectively with significant statistical differences (P < .03). Conclusions The sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy was 81.6%, and a regional nodal basin recurrence after negative-sentinel node biopsy means a worse prognosis, compared with patients submitted to complete lymph node dissection after a positive sentinel biopsy. The evidence of higher number of tumor-positive nodes after delayed lymphadenectomy in false-negative group compared with tumor-positive sentinel node cases, confirmed the importance of an early staging of lymph nodal involvement. Further data will better clarify the role of prognostic factors to identify cases with a more aggressive biological behavior of the disease.     

American Joint Committee on Cancer Clinical Stage as a Selection Criterion for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma

Background A significant proportion of newly diagnosed melanomas are thin lesions (≤1.00 mm). Because tumor thickness correlates with the risk for nodal metastases, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in this subset is controversial. Incorporating other prognostic factors (Clark level and ulceration), we evaluated the 6th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical stage as a simple and widely applicable guideline for offering SLN biopsy for thin melanoma. Methods This study was a review of a prospective melanoma SLN database from 1993 to 2003 with emphasis on SLN positivity rates based on the 6th edition AJCC primary tumor thickness intervals and clinical stage. Results Three hundred five patients underwent SLN biopsy, with an overall positivity rate of 17.7%. By the 6th edition AJCC, lesions ≤1.00 mm had an SLN positivity rate of 6.6%. By 6th edition clinical stage, SLN positivity rates were 4.9% for stage IA and 10.4% for stage IB. By using stage IA as the criterion for not offering SLN biopsy, this procedure would have been avoided in 46% (39 of 85) of ≤1.00-mm melanoma patients with a negative SLN. Conclusions Sixth edition AJCC clinical stage IB as a selection criterion for performing SLN biopsy in thin melanoma identifies most patients with a positive SLN while also avoiding a negative SLN biopsy in many patients. Until additional widely accepted and validated selection criteria are available, SLN biopsy for clinical stage IB, but not stage IA, thin melanomas is a reasonable approach.     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的研究进展

目的 报道乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的研究进展。方法 采用文献回顾的方法，对国外乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的历史、概念、活检技术以及临床应用等问题进行综述。结果 乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的操作方法还没有统一的标准，检出率及假阴性率变化范围广。结论 前哨淋巴结活检的临床应用还需要大量前瞻性多中心随机实验结果进一步论证。     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Melanoma: The WHO Melanoma Program Experience

Background: We report the experience of the World Health Organization (WHO) Melanoma Program concerning sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for detecting patients with occult regional nodal metastases to submit to selective regional node dissection.Methods: From February 1994 to August 1998, in 12 centers of the WHO Melanoma Program, 892 SLN biopsies were performed in 829 patients with clinical stage I melanoma (male: 370; female: 459; median age: 50 years old). The location of the primary melanoma was as follows: trunk, 35%; lower limbs, 45%; upper limbs, 18%; and head and neck, 2%. Blue dye injection for SLN identification was performed in all cases; preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was one in 440 patients, and an intra-operative probe for a radio-guided biopsy was used in 141 cases. Overall, the SLN identification rate was 88%. In 68% of the patients, only one SLN was identified, whereas two and three or more SLN were detected in 24% and 8% of the remaining cases, respectively.Results: Overall SLN positivity rate was 18%. Intra-operative frozen section examination was performed in 39% of the cases and was helpful in detecting occult localizations only in 47% of the positive SLNs. Distribution of positive cases by primary thickness was as follows:,1mm: 2%; 1–1.99 mm: 7%; 2–2.99 mm: 13%; and 3 mm: 31%. Positive nonsentinel lymph nodes were found in 22% of cases with positive SLN submitted for selective dissection. No complications due to the procedure were registered. Of 710 patients who were evaluated, 40 (6%) presented a regional nodal relapse after a negative SLN biopsy and underwent a delayed therapeutic dissection. From the 710 enrolled cases, 638 (88.5%) were alive without evidence of disease at the time of this writing. A multivariate analysis showed SLN status as one of the most significant prognostic factors (P 5 .000) along with thickness (P 5 .001) and ulceration (P 5 .015) of primary tumor.Conclusions: These data confirm the feasibility and safety of the SLN technique for selecting patients to submit to a radical node dissection. The data represent the basis for a future trial by the WHO Melanoma Program in this field to evaluate the most appropriate surgical approach for treating patients with occult regional nodal metastases.     

Axillary Lymph Node Echo-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Enables Breast Cancer Patients to Avoid a Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy. Preliminary Experience and a Review of the Literature

Purpose For many years, the status of the axillary lymph nodes has been determined by an axillary lymphadenectomy. However, a sentinel lymph node biopsy has been shown to effectively replace the need for an axillary lymphadenectomy in order to determine the axillary staging. This study presents the preliminary results regarding the efficacy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) to identify metastatic axillary lymph nodes in the pre-operative phase. Methods One hundred lymph nodes from 100 patients with histologically and cytologically confirmed breast cancer (cT1–2 cN0) underwent echo-guided FNAC. The diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], negative predictive value [NPV]) for the axillary metastases was evaluated based on the histological findings of either a sentinel lymph node biopsy or an axillary lymphadenectomy as a reference standard. Results It was possible to avoid a sentinel lymph node biopsy in 30% of the cases; the sensitivity was 68%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, and NPV 65%. Echo-guided FNAC of the axillary lymph nodes should thus be included among the regular diagnostic procedures of presurgical staging. Conclusion This simple, inexpensive, and minimally invasive technique makes it possible to avoid the additional cost of a sentinel lymph node biopsy while also sparing the patient the stress of undergoing a second surgery.     

Patterns of First-Recurrence and Post-recurrence Survival in Patients with Primary Cutaneous Melanoma After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Background Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become well accepted in management of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. An understanding of the pattern of recurrence after SLNB is helpful in coordinating a rational plan of follow-up in these patients. We sought to determine the site and timing of initial recurrence and post-recurrence survival after SLNB. Methods Stage I/II melanoma patients who underwent SLNB during 1991–2004 were identified from a prospective single-institution database. Site and date of first recurrence after SLNB were recorded. Patterns of recurrence after SLNB and post-recurrence survival were analyzed. Results One thousand and forty-six patients underwent SLNB. The sentinel lymph node (SLN) was positive in 164 patients (16%). Median follow-up was 36 months for survivors. Median and 3-year relapse-free survival for SLN-positive patients were 41 months and 56%, and for SLN-negative patients were not reached and 87%, respectively (P < .0001). Of the SLN-positive patients, 47% experienced recurrence, compared with 14% SLN-negative patients. The pattern of recurrence stratified by SLN status was similar between the two groups (P = NS). After recurrence, the site of recurrence was the only significant prognostic factor influencing survival (P < .0001). Conclusions Although SLN-positive patients experience recurrence far earlier and more frequently than SLN-negative patients, the pattern of recurrence is similar. After recurrence, its site is the primary determinant of survival.     

Incidence of Sentinel Node Metastasis in Patients With Thin Primary Melanoma (#1 mm) With Vertical Growth Phase

Background: Patients with thin primary melanomas (#1 mm) generally have an excellent prognosis. However, the presence of a vertical growth phase (VGP) adversely impacts the survival rate. We report on the rate of occurrence of nodal metastasis in patients with thin primary melanomas with a VGP who are offered sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy.Methods: Among 235 patients with clinically localized cutaneous melanomas who underwent successful SLN biopsy, 71 had lesions 1 mm or smaller with a VGP. The SLN was localized by using blue dye and a radiotracer. If negative for tumor by using hematoxylin and eosin staining, the SLN was further examined by immunohistochemistry.Results: The rate of occurrence of SLN metastasis was 15.2% in patients with melanomas deeper than 1 mm and 5.6% in patients with thin melanomas. Three patients with thin melanomas and a positive SLN had low-risk lesions, based on a highly accurate six-variable multivariate logistic regression model for predicting 8-year survival in stage I/II melanomas. The fourth patient had a low- to intermediate-risk lesion based on this model. At the time of the lymphadenectomy, one patient had two additional nodes with metastasis.Conclusions: VGP in a melanoma 1 mm or smaller seems to be a risk factor for nodal metastasis. The risk of nodal disease may not be accurately predicted by the use of a multivariate logistic regression model that incorporates thickness, mitotic rate, regression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, sex, and anatomical site. Patients with thin lesions having VGP should be evaluated for SLN biopsy and trials of adjuvant therapy when stage III disease is found.Presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Orlando, Florida, March 4–7, 1999.     

Factors Predictive of Nonsentinel Lymph Node Involvement and Clinical Outcome in Melanoma Patients With Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Node

BACKGROUND: Identification of melanoma patients who need completion lymphadenectomy and adjuvant treatment after positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy would be a fundamental step forward toward personalized medicine. This study tested the hypothesis that the microscopic features of metastatic SLNs might predict not only nonsentinel lymph node (NSLN) status, but also patients' clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 96 consecutive melanoma patients who underwent completion lymphadenectomy after positive SLN biopsy. Patients' age and sex, primary tumor Breslow thickness, number of positive SLNs, the largest diameter and depth of invasion of metastatic deposits in the SLN, S stage, and pattern of nodal involvement were correlated with the presence of metastatic disease in NSLNs as well as with the likelihood of tumor recurrence and patient death. RESULTS: At pathological examination, 20 patients (20.8%) had metastatic melanoma in the NSLN. Pattern of nodal involvement, depth of invasion of SLN by metastatic disease, and S stage were statistically significantly associated with the presence of metastatic disease in NSLN. Multivariate analysis revealed that only the SLN depth of invasion was an independent predictor of NSLN status (P = .0035). This parameter was also significantly associated with disease-free and overall survival, both by univariate (P < .0001 and P = .0006, respectively) and multivariate (P < .0001 and P = .0013, respectively) survival analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support further investigation of SLN depth of invasion as a predictive factor of potential clinical use to select patients as candidates for completion lymphadenectomy and adjuvant treatment.     

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer

The role of axillary surgery for the treatment of primary breast cancer is in a process of constant change. During the last decade, axillary dissection with removal of at least 10 lymph nodes (ALD) was replaced by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as a staging procedure. Since then, the indication for SLNB rapidly expanded. Today's surgical strategies aim to minimize the rate of patients with a negative axillary status who undergo ALD. For some subgroups of patients, the indication for SLNB (e.g. multicentric disease, large tumors) or its implication for treatment planning (micrometastatic involvement, neoadjuvant chemotherapy) is being discussed. Although the indication for ALD is almost entirely restricted to patients with positive axillary lymph nodes today, the therapeutic effect of completion ALD is more and more questioned. On the other hand, the diagnostic value of ALD in node-positive patients is discussed. This article reflects today's standards in axillary surgery and discusses open issues on the diagnostic and therapeutic role of SLNB and ALD in the treatment of early breast cancer.     

Significance of Multiple Lymphatic Basin Drainage in Truncal Melanoma Patients Undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Background Truncal melanoma involving metastases to multiple lymph node basins has a much worse prognosis than tumor involvement of a single lymph node basin. Recent results also suggest that, independently of the status of lymph node involvement, patients with multiple lymphatic basin drainage (MLBD) on lymphoscintigraphy have an increased risk of lymph node metastasis and a worse prognosis than those with a single lymphatic drainage basin. Because published reports have conflicting results, the authors compared their experience at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center with recently published findings.Methods The authors searched a prospectively maintained melanoma database at the University of Michigan for patients with primary truncal melanoma who underwent lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node biopsy between 1997 and 2004. The association of MLBD with the clinical and pathologic characteristics collected and the presence of regional metastases was tested by using contingency tables and the χ² test statistic and by using the Fisher’s exact test statistic when cell frequencies were small. The product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier was used to estimate disease-free and overall survival probabilities.Results Of 423 patients with primary truncal melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, 123 (29%) had a positive result, and 98 patients (23.2%) had MLBD. Patients with tumors located in the middle of the trunk and tumor ulceration were more likely to have MLBD (P < .0001 and P = .045, respectively). Patients with a single lymphatic drainage basin and MLBD had a similar risk of lymph node metastasis and similar disease-free and overall survival.Conclusions Patients with truncal melanomas tend to have MLBD when the tumor is located in the middle of the trunk or when ulceration is present. In our experience, drainage to multiple lymphatic basins was not an independent risk factor for sentinel lymph node metastasis and has no independent prognostic significance.     

Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology prior to Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Melanoma Patients

Background Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) allows early detection of metastases, thereby enabling early treatment in melanoma patients likely to benefit from adjuvant therapies. This prospective study analyzes the possible benefits of additional ultrasound (US) and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of sentinel nodes (SN) prior to SLNB.Method Over a 2-year period 127 melanoma patients with 151 SN were scheduled for SLNB. All SN were initially identified with lymphoscintigraphy, then identified and evaluated by US and the cells aspirated for cytology (FNAC). US findings and FNAC results were compared to surgical findings.Results Of 127 patients, 114 had one SN each, 12 had two, and one had three. In vivo US achieved a sensitivity of 79% (95% CI: 62–91%) and a specificity of 72% (95% CI: 62–81%). FNAC showed a sensitivity of 59% (95% CI: 41–76%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 95–100%). The combination of these two in vivo methods achieved an overall sensitivity of 82% (95% CI: 65–93%) and an overall specificity of 72% [95% CI: 62–81%].Conclusion Combined US and FNAC provides important information prior to SLNB in that both procedures identify metastases in the lymph nodes (sensitivity > 80%). Patients with positive FNAC may proceed directly to complete lymph node dissection (cLND) instead of having initial SLNB. Thus, combined US and FNAC may prevent unnecessary anesthesia and surgical management as well reduce costs. In our study 16% (19/121) fewer SLNB procedures were carried out, subsequently replaced by cLND. For patients with a negative combination of in vivo US and FNAC, SLNB remains the best diagnostic option.Part of this work was presented in May 2003 at the Melanoma session of the 39^th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology in Chicago, Illinois, and at the Oral Melanoma Poster Discussion session of the 40^th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology in New Orleans, Louisiana.     

Sentinel Node Biopsy Provides More Accurate Staging Than Elective Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma

Background: In most major melanoma treatment centers, sentinel node biopsy (SNB), with complete regional lymph node dissection when a positive sentinel node is found, has now replaced elective lymph node dissection (ELND) for patients with primary cutaneous melanomas who are considered to be at moderate to high risk of nodal recurrence. As for ELND, however, no overall survival benefit for the SNB procedure has yet been demonstrated. The objective of this study was to compare the nodal staging accuracy and duration of survival for SNB and ELND.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II disease treated at a single center between 1983 and 2000 with either SNB (n = 672) or ELND (n = 793). Multivariate analyses were performed using the logistic regression model for nodal staging accuracy and Coxs proportional hazards regression model for survival.Results: Patient factors that influenced nodal positivity included age, Breslow thickness, ulceration, head or neck primary, and operation type (SNB or ELND). SNB was superior to ELND in the detection of micrometastases (odds ratio 1.23, 95% CI, 1.06 – 1.43) but operation type did not influence survival (P = .24).Conclusions: Sentinel node biopsy identified more nodal micrometastases than ELND but did not influence survival, although complete regional node dissection was performed in all patients who were SNB positive. This increase in staging accuracy likely results from the reliable identification of the appropriate lymph node field by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, along with more detailed pathologic examination of the nodes removed by SNB.Presented to the Society of Surgical Oncology, New York, March 2004     

Role of Combined Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Node Sampling in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer

Axillary lymph node status is a prognostic marker in breast cancer management, and axillary surgery plays an important role in staging and local control. This study aims to assess whether a combination of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using patent blue dye and axillary node sampling (ANS) offers equivalent identification rate to dual tracer technique. Furthermore, we aim to investigate whether there are any potential benefits to this combined technique. Retrospective study of 230 clinically node-negative patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery for single T1–T3 tumours between 2006 and 2011. Axillae were staged using a combined blue dye SLNB/ANS technique. SLNs were localized in 226/230 (identification rate 98.3 %). Three of one hundred ninety-two patients with a negative SLN were found to have positive ANS nodes and 1/4 failed SLNB patients had positive ANS nodes. Thirty-four of two hundred twenty-six patients had SLN metastases and 11/34 (32.4 %) also had a positive non-sentinel lymph node on ANS. Twenty-one of twenty-four (87.5 %) node-positive T1 tumours had single node involvement. Nine of thirty-eight node-positive patients progressed to completion axillary clearance (cALND), and the rest were treated with axillary radiotherapy. Axillary recurrence was nil at median 5 year follow-up. Complementing SLNB with axillary node sampling (ANS) decreases the unavoidable false-negative rate associated with SLNB. Appropriate operator experience and technique can result in an SLN localization rate of 98 %, rivalling a dual tracer technique. The additional insight offered by ANS into the status of non-sentinel nodes has potential applications in an era of less frequent cALND.     

The Prognostic Importance of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma

Background Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is prognostically useful in patients with cutaneous melanoma with Breslow thickness >1 mm. The objective of this study was to determine whether sentinel node histology has similar prognostic importance in patients with thin melanomas (≤1 mm). Methods This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent SLNB for clinically localized melanoma at Indiana University Medical Center between 1994 and 2003. SLNB results and traditional melanoma prognostic indicators were studied in univariate log-rank tests. Results One hundred eighty-four patients with melanomas ≤1 mm thick underwent SLNB. SLNB was tumor positive in 12 patients (6.5%). Univariate analysis of SLNB results revealed that Breslow thickness, Clark level of invasion, and mitotic index were associated with SLNB status. Tumor positivity was observed at different rates in tumor thickness subsets: <.75 mm, 2.3%; and .75 to 1.0 mm, 10.2% (P = .0372). Disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly associated with SLNB results in melanomas ≤1 mm (log-rank test: P < .0001 and P = .0125, respectively) at a median follow-up of 26.3 months. Conclusions SLNB histology in melanomas ≤1.0 mm deep is a significant predictor of outcome. SLNB should be considered for selected patients with melanomas .75 to 1.0 mm.     

Early Recurrence After Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients With Primary Extremity Melanoma: A Comparison With Elective Lymph Node Dissection

Introduction: Although sentinel node biopsy with completion lymphadenectomy in node-positive patients (SLND) has been widely adopted in the management of patients with early stage melanoma, reports detailing the outcome of patients after SLND are limited. To address this issue, we analyzed our experience with SLND and provided a comparison to patients treated with elective lymph node dissection (ELND).Methods: All patients who underwent SLND (1991–1998) and ELND (1974–1994) were identified from single institution melanoma databases.Results: A total of 152 and 329 patients with early-stage melanoma of the extremity underwent SLND and ELND, respectively. Nodal metastases were present in 44 of 329 ELND patients (13%) and in 31 of 152 SLND patients (20%). Early relapse-free and disease-specific survivals were similar for the entire population, although in patients at higher risk for recurrence (age >50 years, thickness >3.0 mm), there was an increased rate of relapse in the SLND group (P = .04). Among all sites of early recurrences, locoregional sites were more common in patients undergoing SLND (72%) compared with ELND (39%, P < .01). SLN-negative patients with nodal recurrence had evidence of metastases on retrospective enhanced pathologic analysis in four of seven cases.Conclusions: Although overall relapse-free and disease-specific survivals are similar, there is a higher rate of relapse in a subset of SLND node-negative patients who are at high risk for nodal metastases. ELND and SLNB should not be thought of as equivalent approaches until studies with longer follow-up are available.     

Sentinel Node Biopsy Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Spares Breast Cancer Patients Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients is a valuable method to determine the efficacy of chemotherapy and potentially downsize the primary tumor, which facilitates breast-conserving therapy. In 18 studies published about sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the sentinel node was identified in on average 89%, and the false-negative rate was on average 10%. Because of these mediocre results, no author dares to omit axillary clearance just yet. In our institute, sentinel lymph node biopsy is performed before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience with this approach. Methods Sentinel node biopsy was performed before neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 25 T2N0 patients by using lymphoscintigraphy, a gamma ray detection probe, and patent blue dye. Axillary lymph node dissection was performed after chemotherapy if the sentinel node contained metastases. Results Ten patients had a tumor-positive axillary sentinel node, and one patient had an involved lateral intramammary node. Four patients had additional involved nodes in the completion lymph node dissection specimen. The other 14 patients (56%) had a tumor-negative sentinel node and did not undergo axillary lymph node dissection. No recurrences have been observed after a median follow-up of 18 months. Conclusions Fourteen (56%) of the 25 patients were spared axillary lymph node dissection when the sentinel node was found to be disease free. Performing sentinel node biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems successful and reliable in patients with T2N0 breast cancer.