Hepatitis B virus and liver transplantation: concepts in antiviral prophylaxis

Summary. Liver transplantation remains problematic in patients with end-stage liver disease secondary to chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Recurrent hepatitis is almost universal in those patients who are HBV DNA-positive prior to transplantation. Prophylactic hepatitis B immune globulin can be given to reduce the rate of hepatitis B recurrence in patients who are HBV DNA-negative prior to transplantation. More recently novel antiviral drugs such as lamivudine or famciclovir have been used specifically to inhibit hepatitis B viral replication. However, the development of drug-resistant viral mutants have been observed. Further studies are needed to investigate these drugs more extensively, particularly to assess whether combination therapy may be a more effective means of controlling viral recurrence in patients transplanted for chronic HBV infection.     

Prevention of lamivudine‐resistant hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation with entecavir plus tenofovir combination therapy and perioperative hepatitis B immunoglobulin only

T. Karlas, J. Hartmann, A. Weimann, M. Maier, M. Bartels, S. Jonas, J. Mössner, T. Berg, H.L. Tillmann, J. Wiegand. Prevention of lamivudine‐resistant hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation with entecavir plus tenofovir combination therapy and perioperative hepatitis B immunoglobulin only.
Transpl Infect Dis 2011: 13: 299–302. All rights reserved Abstract: Combination therapy with antivirals plus hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) has become the standard treatment for prevention of post‐liver transplant hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence. However, HBIg therapy is inconvenient and expensive. Alternative therapeutic approaches with modern nucleos(t)ide analogues are limited so far. The present case report describes prevention of HBV recurrence with entecavir and tenofovir. A 48‐year‐old male patient with hepatitis B‐induced decompensated liver cirrhosis initially improved on lamivudine (LAM) until LAM resistance (rtL180M and rtM204V) emerged followed by renewed decompensation. Therefore, tenofovir was added to LAM leading to undetectable HBV DNA (<200 copies/mL). Six months later, low‐level viremia (479 copies/mL) was detected. Treatment was escalated to tenofovir plus entecavir. HBV DNA became negative again, and the patient underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. HBIg was administered during transplantation (10,000 IU) and on the second and third postoperative days (total dose 26,000 IU). Subsequently, the anti‐hepatitis B surface (HBs) titer rose to 1477 IU/L at day 4 post transplantation. Although HBIg should have been continued, the patient remained on combination therapy with tenofovir plus entecavir only. The anti‐HBs titer decreased and became negative 4 months later. However, under continued combination therapy with oral antivirals, HBV DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen remained negative during the entire follow‐up of 21 months after liver transplantation. Combination therapy with entecavir plus tenofovir may prevent post‐liver transplant hepatitis B recurrence even without HBIg maintenance therapy. This case illustrates that combination oral antiviral therapy might substitute for HBIg as indefinite prophylactic regimen due to profound antiviral efficacy and low risk of viral resistance. Efficacy and safety must be further investigated in randomized controlled trials.     

Chronic viral hepatitis in kidney transplantation

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in potential kidney transplant candidates-once considered absolute contraindications to kidney transplantation-no longer creates overt barriers to transplantation. Advances in the medical management of HBV and HCV infection have created opportunities for a substantial number of patients to be effectively treated with antiviral therapy before transplantation. For HBV infection, a number of new drugs enable clearance of the virus with minimal adverse effects and drug resistance. Pretransplantation antiviral therapy is advisable for patients with HCV infection, but adverse effects are common and viral eradication remains challenging. Regardless of viral clearance, pretransplant patients without bridging fibrosis (as confirmed by liver biopsy) or clinical stigmata of cirrhosis should be considered for kidney transplantation as survival is superior when compared to treatment with dialysis, and progression of liver disease is unlikely. For patients with advanced liver disease, simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation is an important consideration. These treatment advances further increase the burden of organ donor shortage; however, organs from deceased donors with chronic HBV or HCV infection could be efficiently allocated to certain individuals with a viral infection of the same type to increase the pool of available transplant organs.     

Hepatitis B and C virus infections in the immune compromised

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review compares and contrasts the natural history and treatment of hepatitis B and C virus infections in three principal populations of immune compromised individuals: (1) patients co-infected with HIV; (2) patients with liver failure secondary to hepatitis B or C virus infection who undergo liver transplantation, and (3) patients with hepatitis B or C virus infection who undergo anticancer chemotherapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Chronic liver disease resulting from hepatitis B or C virus infection progresses more rapidly in patients co-infected with HIV than in HIV negative patients. Treatment protocols for antiviral therapy are, however, similar to those used in immunocompetent individuals and although few long-term results are available, the efficacy of interferon and ribavirin therapy in hepatitis C virus/HIV infection and lamivudine in HIV/hepatitis B virus infection has been proven in the short-term. Perhaps the most important consideration is the timing of administering treatments to co-infected patients. For patients with well preserved CD4 counts and hepatitis C virus/HIV co-infection, the hepatitis infection should be treated as early as possible to avoid drug interactions of hepatitis C virus antivirals with antiretroviral therapy. Also, response to hepatitis C virus treatment appears better when treatment is administered in the context of preserved immune function. Conversely, in hepatitis B virus/HIV co-infection, hepatitis B virus antivirals are best administered with anti-retroviral therapy, thus preventing the selection of HIV viral species which may be resistant to the drugs used for hepatitis B virus. Improved graft and patient survival after liver transplant and with anticancer chemotherapy in hepatitis B virus infected patients has been proven using lamivudine prophylaxis. However, although therapy for hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation would seem rational, limited success with current treatment protocols has been achieved. SUMMARY: Although the prognosis of hepatitis B and C virus infections in the immune compromised may be inferior to that of immunocompetent individuals, such patients should have full evaluation of their viral hepatitis, and antiviral therapy should be considered.     

Recent advances in prevention of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is the only effective treatment for hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related end-stage liver disease.However,without antiviral prophylaxis,the recurrence rate of hepatitis B is as high as 80%-100%,which leads to a 50% mortality rate in the first 2 years after liver transplantation.Combination therapy of hepatitis B immunoglobulin(HBIG) and lamivudine demonstrated a higher efficacy of prophylaxis and further reduced the rate of recurrence to < 10%.The strategy of HBIG combined with lamivudine has been the standard treatment in many centers.However,the high rate of lamivudine resistance and the many disadvantages of HBIG have compelled surgeons to reconsider the longterm efficacy of this strategy for the prevention of HBV reinfection.Recently,new nucleos(t)ide analogues,such as entecavir and tenofovir,have been approved as first-line monotherapies for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection.These antiviral medicines have replaced lamivudine as the first choice in the prevention of HBV recurrence after liver transplantation.Various therapies that are composed of entecavir,tenofovir,and lamivudine plus adefovir,with or without HBIG have been adopted in several liver transplant centers.This article reviews the recent advances in prophylaxis for the recurrence of hepatitis B after liver transplantation.     

Diagnostic and therapeutic progress of multi-drug resistance with anti-HBV nucleos(t)ide analogues

Nucleos(t)ide analogues(NA) are a breakthrough in the treatment and management of chronic hepatitis B.NA could suppress the replication of hepatitis B virus(HBV) and control the progression of the disease.However,drug resistance caused by their long-term use becomes a practical problem,which influences the long-term outcomes in patients.Liver transplantation is the only choice for patients with HBV-related end-stage liver disease.But,the recurrence of HBV after transplantation often caused by the development of drug resistance leads to unfavorable outcomes for the recipients.Recently,the multi-drug resistance(MDR) has become a common issue raised due to the development and clinical application of a variety of NA.This may complicate the antiviral therapy and bring poorly prognostic outcomes.Although clinical evidence has suggested that combination therapy with different NA could effectively reduce the viral load in patients with MDR,the advent of new antiviral agents with high potency and high genetic barrier to resistance brings hope to antiviral therapy.The future of HBV researches relies on how toprevent the MDR occurrence and develop reasonable and effective treatment strategies.This review focuses on the diagnostic and therapeutic progress in MDR caused by the anti-HBV NA and describes some new research progress in this field.     

Liver transplantation for viral hepatitis in 2015

Liver transplantation(LT) is a life-saving treatment forpatients with end-stage liver disease and for patients with liver cell cancer related to liver disease. Acute and chronic liver diseases related to hepatitis viruses are between the main indications for liver transplantation. The risk of viral reinfection after transplantation is the main limiting factor in these indications. Before the availability of antiviral prophylaxis, hepatitis B virus(HBV) recurrence was universal in patients who were HBV DNA-positive before transplantation. The natural history of recurrent HBV was accelerated by immunosuppression, and it progressed rapidly to graft failure and death. Introduction of post-transplant prophylaxis with immunoglobulin alone first, and associated to antiviral drugs later, drastically reduced HBV recurrence, resulting in excellent long-term outcomes. On the contrary, recurrence of hepatitis C is the main cause of graft loss in most transplant programs. Overall, patient and graft survival after LT for hepatitis C virus(HCV)-associated cirrhosis is inferior compared with other indications. However, successful pretransplant or post transplant antiviral therapy has been associated with increased graft and overall survival. Until recently, the combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin was the standard of care for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Highly active antiviral compounds have been developed over the past decade, thanks to new in vitro systems to study HCV entry, replication, assembly, and release.     

REVIEW: Hepatitis B and liver transplantation

Liver transplantation in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients is very commonly followed by recurrence of infection in the transplanted liver. Most recipients with HBV recurrence will develop chronic hepatitis that follows a more aggressive course than is seen in non-immuno-compromized subjects and this frequently results in graft failure. The presence of hepatitis B e antigen or significant levels of HBV-DNA in the serum is highly predictive of recurrence and this has led to the view that patients, whose serum is positive for these conventional markers of replication, should be excluded from transplantation. The key to improving the results of transplantation in patients with HBV infection lies in the development of effective strategies to prevent reinfection. High dose anti-HBs immunoglobulin is effective in patients who are coinfected with hepatitis D, those transplanted for fulminant hepatitis and cirrhotic patients who have very low levels of viral replication prior to transplantation. Unfortunately, immunoprophylaxis does not seem to influence the outcome in those patients with higher levels of replication. There are several new orally active nucleoside analogues that are potent inhibitors of hepatitis B replication that may be effective for both the prevention and treatment of recurrent disease. The most promising are lamivudine (2',3', dideoxy, 3', thiacytidine) and famciclovir (a guanosine analogue). Both agents have been extensively evaluated in animal models of HBV and have been shown to rapidly suppress viral replication. The initial experience with these agents in liver transplant recipients has been promising and a number of studies are currently underway to determine whether these drugs, used alone or in combination with immunoprophylaxis, are able to prevent recurrence in those patients at highest risk of post-transplant HBV recurrence.     

Fatal disseminated visceral varicella zoster virus infection in a renal transplant recipient

We report a case of fatal disseminated varicella zoster virus (VZV) with delayed–onset rash in a 66‐year‐old female more than 2 years following uncomplicated deceased donor renal transplantation. Whilst on a stable regimen of maintenance immunosuppression, the patient presented with chest and abdominal pain with concomitant hepatitis and pancreatitis. After pursuing multiple other potential causes of her symptoms, the correct diagnosis of VZV was only suspected after the development of a widespread vesicular rash—11 days after her initial symptoms. Despite antiviral therapy and inotropic support in the intensive care unit, the patient died. Simultaneous VZV hepatitis and pancreatitis in solid organ transplant recipients is uncommon. The new inactivated VZV vaccines have the potential to prevent post‐transplant infections, with promising early clinical data on safety and efficacy in renal transplant recipients. VZV is an important preventable infection that should be considered in immunocompromised patients, even in the absence of rash.     

Characteristics of randomized controlled trials on liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The randomized controlled trial (RCT) provides the highest quality evidence and plays an important role in establishing evidence-based medicine. Although many RCTs have been performed in the field of liver transplantation (LTx), there has been no analysis of RCTs on LTx. Therefore, this study analyzed the characteristics of RCTs on LTx. METHODOLOGY: A MEDLINE search was performed to identify prospective RCTs on LTx published in the last decade. Eligible RCTs were analyzed using the following items: study theme, publication year, geographical area, sample size, multicenter study, and impact factor. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-four papers were eligible for review. Geographically, most RCTs were carried out in Europe and North America. Studies examining the efficacy of immunosuppressants such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine in liver transplant recipients were most frequently performed. RCTs on hepatoprotective agents against liver injury, prophylactic therapy for cytomegalovirus infection, antiviral therapy against hepatitis B or C viral infection, and surgical procedures follow in numerical order. Recently, the number of RCTs on antiviral therapy against hepatitis B or C viral infection is increasing. The average sample number is nearly 100. The rate of multicenter studies among all RCTs is 27%. Interestingly, the rate of multicenter study in the latter half is significantly higher than that in the former half. CONCLUSIONS: Many RCTs on LTx have been performed all over the world, especially in Europe and North America. RCTs on antiviral therapy against recurrence of hepatitis B or C virus after LTx are increasing in number, since this has recently become a major problem after LTx.     

Current prophylactic strategies against hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation

Prophylactic strategies against hepatitis B virus （HBV） recurrence after liver transplantation （LT） are essential for patients with HBV-related disease. Before LT, lamivudine （LAM） was proposed to be down-graded from first- to second-line therapy. In contrast, adefovir dipivoxil （ADV） has been approved not only as first-line therapy but also as rescue therapy for patients with LAM resistance. Furthermore, combination of ADV and LAM may result in lower risk of ADV resistance than ADV monotherapy. Other new drugs such as entecavir, telbivudine and tenofovir, are probably candidates for the treatment of hepatitis-B-surface-antigen-positive patients awaiting LT. After LT, low-dose intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin （HBIG）, in combination with LAM, has been regarded as the most cost-effective regimen for the prevention of post-transplant HBV recurrence in recipients without pretransplant LAM resistance and rapidly accepted in many transplant centers. With the introduction of new antiviral drugs, new hepatitis B vaccine and its new adjuvants, post-transplant HBIG-free therapeutic regimens with new oral antiviral drug combinations or active HBV vaccination combined with adjuvants will be promising, particularly in those patients with low risk of HBV recurrence.     

Prevention of allograft HCV recurrence with peri‐transplant human monoclonal antibody MBL‐HCV1 combined with a single oral direct‐acting antiviral: A proof‐of‐concept study

Patients with active hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection at transplantation experience rapid allograft infection, increased risk of graft failure and accelerated fibrosis. MBL‐HCV1, a neutralizing human monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the HCV envelope, was combined with a licensed oral direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) to prevent HCV recurrence post‐transplant in an open‐label exploratory efficacy trial. Eight subjects received MBL‐HCV1 beginning on the day of transplant with telaprevir initiated between days 3 and 7 post‐transplantation. Following FDA approval of sofosbuvir, two subjects received MBL‐HCV1 starting on the day of transplant with sofosbuvir initiated on day 3. Combination treatment was administered for 8‐12 weeks or until the stopping rule for viral rebound was met. The primary endpoint was undetectable HCV RNA at day 56 with exploratory endpoints of sustained virologic response (SVR) at 12 and 24 weeks post‐treatment. Both subjects receiving mAb and sofosbuvir achieved SVR24. Four of eight subjects in the mAb and telaprevir group met the primary endpoint; one subject achieved SVR24 and three subjects relapsed 2‐12 weeks post‐treatment. The other four subjects experienced viral breakthrough. There were no serious adverse events related to study treatment. This proof‐of‐concept study demonstrates that peri‐transplant immunoprophylaxis combined with a single oral direct‐acting antiviral in the immediate post‐transplant period can prevent HCV recurrence.     

Aktueller Stand der Lebertransplantation

End-stage liver disease due to viral hepatitis is a frequent indication for liver transplantation as the ultimate treatment option in Germany and worldwide. Chronic infections with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) lead to liver cirrhosis and progressive organ failure requiring patients to be short-listed for liver transplantation. Treatment options for viral hepatitis before and after liver transplantation have improved considerably in recent years. The effective antiviral treatment of chronic HBV infections with up to date nucleos(t)ide analogues featuring high antiviral potency and low rates of resistance has been followed by a considerable decrease in hepatitis B associated liver transplantations. The effective but expensive combination prophylaxis of human hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ide analogues after transplantation has reduced the number of HBV reinfections to almost negligible numbers. Hepatitis C virus reinfection occurs regularly after liver transplantation. Factors such as donor age and excessive immunosuppression negatively influence the course of HCV reinfection. The practicability and value of modern triple therapy regimens including interferon, ribavirin and protease inhibitors as well as substances still in clinical development before and after liver transplantation still need to be evaluated.     

Eliminating viral hepatitis in children after liver transplants: How to reach the goal by 2030

Viral hepatitis infections are a great burden in children who have received liver transplant.Hepatotropic viruses can cause liver inflammation that can develop into liver graft fibrosis and cirrhosis over the long term.Immunological reactions due to viral hepatitis infections are associated with or can mimic graft rejection,rendering the condition difficult to manage.Prevention strategies using vaccinations are agreeable to patients,safe,cost-effective and practical.Hence,strategies to eliminate viral hepatitis A and B focus mainly on immunization programmes for children who have received a liver transplant.Although a vaccine has been developed to prevent hepatitis C and E viruses,its use is not licensed worldwide.Consequently,eliminating hepatitis C and E viruses mainly involves early detection in children with suspected cases and effective treatment with antiviral therapy.Good hygiene and sanitation are also important to prevent hepatitis A and E infections.Donor blood products and liver grafts should be screened for hepatitis B,C and E in children who are undergoing liver transplantation.Future research on early detection of viral hepatitis infections should include molecular techniques for detecting hepatitis B and E.Moreover,novel antiviral drugs for eradicating viral hepatitis that are highly effective and safe are needed for children who have undergone liver transplantation.     

Retrospective evaluation of the risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation after transplantation

Abstract: Numerous case reports describe patients with previously documented immunity developing active hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after transplantation. However, the risk of reactivation of HBV under long‐term immunosuppression in hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)‐positive, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐negative transplant recipients has not been clearly described. Herein, we present a long‐term follow‐up for 49 HBcAb‐positive, HBsAg‐negative recipients (27 liver, 18 kidney, 4 pancreas) transplanted between June 1996 and April 2001. Among these, 37 recipients (76%) were HBsAb positive at transplantation. Immunosuppression consisted of various antibody induction regimens in 20 (41%) of the recipients with either tacrolimus (33 [67%])‐ or cyclosporine (16 [33%])‐based maintenance immunosuppression. The incidence and duration of HBV prophylaxis was not significant. No patient received hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) before or after transplantation. Additionally, only two patients received lamivudine, which was started post transplant without clinical indication. The mean length of follow‐up was 3.1±1.4 years. At the last follow‐up, overall patient and graft survival were 98% and 96%, respectively. Patient survival was 96% in liver, 100% in kidney, and 100% in pancreas transplant recipients. The graft survival for each organ type was 93% in liver, 100% in kidney, and 75% in pancreas transplant recipients at the end of follow‐up. There was no incidence of HBV reactivation defined as recurrence of HBsAg and/or HBV DNA positivity. These data suggest that the risk of reactivation of HBV in HBcAb‐positive, HBsAg‐negative transplant recipients under immunosuppression is negligible, regardless of immunosuppressive regimen, lamivudine prophylaxis, or HBsAb status. These patients should have access to transplantation as they enjoy excellent patient and graft survival rates.     

Evolution of hepatitis B management in kidney transplantation

Chronic hepatitis B virus(HBV)infection adversely influences the clinical outcomes of renal transplant recipients owing to increased hepatic complications.Management of HBV infection in kidney transplant recipients presents a challenge to clinicians,especially in endemic regions.Interferon precipitates renal allograft dysfunction.Treatment with lamivudine,the first oral nucleoside analogue available,resulted in effective viral suppression,reduced liver-related complications,and improved patient survival so that medium-term data showed comparable patient survival rates between hepatitis B surface antigen-positive and HBsAg-negative kidney transplant recipients in the era of effective antiviral therapies.Entecavir has replaced lamivudine as first-line therapy for treatment-na?ve subjects in view of the propensity for drug resistance with the latter.Management of HBV infection in kidney transplant patients needs to take into consideration the nephrotoxicity of nucleoside/tide analogues such as adefovir and tenofovir.Prevention of HBV-related complications in kidney transplant recipients starts much earlier prior to transplantation,with vaccination of patients with chronic kidney disease and donor-recipient matching with regard to HBV status.In addition to anti-viral treatment,patients with chronic HBV infection must have regular surveillance for liver cancer and assessment for the development of cirrhosis.     

A prophylactic approach for bone marrow transplantation from a hepatitis B surface antigen-positive donor

It has been accepted that bone marrow transplantation (BMT)is the only curative therapeutic option for certain hematologic malignancies.The southeast Asia region is an endemic area of hepatitis B virus(HBV)infection;thus,BMT using a hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg)-positive donor is occasionally unavoidable.Organ transplantation using a HBsAg-positive donor can lead to post-transplantation de novo HBV infection and severe HBV-related hepatitis if no effective prophylactic measures are taken prior to and after transplantation.In this report,a four-level approach was designed for a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia,beginning with a booster HBV vaccination before performing BMT with a HBsAg-positive donor.Prior to BMT,the HBV viral load of the donor was reduced to an undetectable level by antiviral therapy.After BMT,hepatitis B immunoglobulin was administered intramuscularly for 1 wk together with a long-term antiviral drug,lamivudine.One year after discontinuation of lamivudine,the patient is still free of HBV infection.     

Significance of viral status on prognosis of hepatitis B‐related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection in East Asia

Tumor recurrence remains one major obstacle for further improving the prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after curative liver resection. It has been widely reported that tumor size, positive surgical margin, macroscopic vascular invasion, tumor–node–metastasis stage and Edmondson's grade were significantly related to HCC recurrence. However, the association between HCC recurrence and important viral factors, including the HBV DNA levels, status of hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B e‐antigen, levels of cccDNA and hepatitis B core‐related antigen, viral genotypes and specific viral sequence mutations remained controversial. Meanwhile, studies on the effect of postoperative adjuvant antiviral therapy on HCC recurrence have been relatively limited and have yielded conflicting results. Identification of certain viral risk factors for HCC recurrence and stratification of patient risk are very important to perform future surveillance programs. As a HBV hyperendemic region, the majority of HBV‐related HCC patients develop in East Asia. In this article, we thus systematically reviewed the risk of important viral factors involved in recurrent carcinogenesis and the role of adjuvant antiviral therapy in preventing tumor recurrence in this area.     

The role of entecavir in preventing hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE: Although hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation has been reduced to 0%–10% since the application of the combination therapy of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and lamivudine, the viral mutation resistance of lamivudine is still an obstacle to the outcome of liver transplantation. Here we evaluate the role of entecavir in preventing hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation.

METHODS:

Patients who received a liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐related end‐stage liver disease in our center from March 2006 to December 2008 were enrolled in this study. All patients received entecavir (0.5 mg orally, daily) or lamivudine (100 mg orally, daily) together with a long‐term low dosage of HBIG to prevent hepatitis B recurrence after transplantation. Serum viral markers (HBsAg, anti‐HBs, HBeAg, anti‐HBc and anti‐HBe) and HBV‐DNA level were determined. RESULTS: Thirty patients receiving entecavir and 90 patients receiving lamivudine were matched with the same age and sex in both groups. No reinfection of hepatitis B was detected in the entecavir group. The hepatitis B surface antigen of patients in the entecavir group became negative within one week and no patient had any adverse effect relating to entecavir. There was no difference in the cumulative survival rate between the entecavir group and the lamivudine group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study shows that entecavir combined with low dosages of HBIG is effective and safe in preventing hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation, but its long‐term effect is still under investigation and a large‐sample study will be carried out in the future.